I love giant beans :-) . Seriously their is clear evidence around the world that our ancestors (?) used to find it easy to work with stone at the megalithic scale and proportion in a way that if we tried today would be ruinously expensive and resource intensive. This at a time when population was supposed to be much less. Even with plentiful food supplies this does not make sense. There is a missing piece in our understanding.
You're exactly right, there was a time when it didn't matter what size you were or how strong you were, the only thing that did matter was how much Physics you understood to get the job done...
@@AlaskaPirates people these days think they know everything 95% percent of people have never even heard of this stuff personally Iam Completely obsessed with this megalithic stuff from history we know nothing about yet was obviously pretty advanced more than we work out anyway.
@@87mrreynolds right! I travel to ruins too, it’s my favorite part of travel honestly, I am also a builder, so it it of particular interest to me. You can’t tell me that the history we are taught is anywhere close to correct. There is no explanation for the things that I have seen and touched. It truly is an interesting world we live in.
@@AlaskaPirates I’ve been interested in this for so long I’ve tired showing pictures to my friend who’s a builder thinking maybe he be interested and my ex partner who’s still my good friend I talked to her about it at length but you can’t make someone become interested in This stuff and I hate talking to someone about it who you can see are not actually interested
@@TheDAT9 Agreed - the ancient builders were using advanced technology and methods - we have no idea what else they had advanced. I'm sure medicene, physical, mental, spiritual health would be equally advanced. They may have figured out how to motivate the world without a buck too!
The builders or engineers of megalithic structures are here, today. They existed on Earth, before we did. One of the names we call them is Reptilian, sometimes, Aliens. The cult of Christ references them as Fallen Angels.
@@JohnBusakowski This is stupid ! Didnt they remove 30 feet of sand from the Sphinx? back in the days only the head was visible. And then EasterIsland...the figures were buried to their neck...they dug it free and see..wow...its not only a head its a full body..TAKE THIS SCIENCE !! :D
@@HighterTV Yep - Basic reasoning for all of this is the disbelief that there was a recent global cataclysm 11,600-12,800 years ago that essentially reshaped HUMAN POPULATION as we know it. Not only do we need to dig on land, but we need to actually organize dive teams in near coast ocean depths of up to 300'; the level of oceans pre meltwater pulse 1a and 1b.
air pockets look like conc work today when u dont 'rod' the conc when poured. those columns look like they were poured using forms. rounded tops? fred and barney didnt crawl out of a cave and suddenly become civil eng's. and talented const techs here or anywhere else, worldwide. past theories about all this type const and methods used are ludicrous. they had advanced eng and tech help from somewhere, and i think i know where. the truth that cannot say its name. if anywhere proof exists it is surely right here, and in other mega-sites all over.
Megaliths in Mexico...I noticed a few in the structures at Coba and Chichen Itza when I visited a few months ago...however nowhere near as large as the lintels here in Oaxaca, a place I heard many great things about on my trip. It’s really uncanny; the lintels seemed to be shaped by the same builders as the foundation blocks in the structure. It follows that other builders came along and built rough walls upon the foundation wall. What’s strange is that the level of ingenuity needed to place those lintels so perfectly doesn’t match the skill level in the middle of the wall however that middle wall was obviously built by the same people who installed the lintels. If not, now we’re talking 3 different stages of building and that becomes an even more unlikely scenario. These lintels are most likely leftover pieces from the original builders after some cataclysm...but that raises yet another question: If there was a cataclysm where are the rest of the stones of the original structure? Perhaps the original building(s) fell due to cataclysm...then those pieces were used to build the foundation of a much larger structure...that those perfectly fit foundation stones only seen in the first/second course may exhaust the total amount of stones from the original structure leaving only the lintels left. This theory also somewhat precariously assumes that these second builders had enough skill to lay these pieces of ashlar perfectly just like their predecessors. Every theory seems to hinge on a number or unlikely assumptions. Hmmmmmm..... As a mason. I don’t usually buy into theories about people removing stones from ancient sites and transporting them to build elsewhere for a number of reasons. These sites you show here in southern Mexico, like most sites around the world, really leave you wondering what happened...to erect and place those lintels and then construction halts? Like Sasqawaman in Peru, the grand yet incomplete nature of these sites is simply baffling. Thanks again for your work...
Funny you claim to be a Mason, but you never heard the term used brick. Highly sought out back in the 70's for building walls, pilasters and pavers. I always thought it was a common practice...
@@steve-o6413 i mentioned stone and ancient sites and somehow you conflate that with ‘bricks’ in the ‘70’s’ ? Your comment hardly warrants a response brother
The superior stonework could have been the result of a multigenerational mason family who perfected their art and protected their secrets. The last family had only one son and he wanted to be a dentist, all was lost.
Iam a 38 year old man who’s obsessed with this kind of stuff yet never met anyone who cares or knows anything about it but Iam promise my self to go on one of these tours as soon as This lockdown madness is over Iam guessing other people won’t mind me chatting with them I hope I must go it’s my life’s goal and my main hobby and interest
What does your geologist say about the weathering of those basalt columns? If that is truly hard basalt, then they look to be aged by the tens of thousands of years.
How far below grade do the walls extend to their true foundations? It's possible that we're seeing the tops of walls and the beams were simply raised and the crude walls built to fill the gaps. I've seen nothing to show the actual foundation stones of any of the world's megalithic sites.
hahaha, i was thinking the same, worst, the king probably said off with your head if you can't do it, amazing to think 1000s years ago had tech to do this...
It is interesting to think about what would have been plastered. You could have nice stonework on bottom and top with crude in the middle if you were going to plaster the middle anyway. I think this makes for an aesthetically pleasing design.
It’s almost like the original builders came back after these tribes left and put all the megalithic stones on the top of everything. My brother thinks that the original builders might have been quite a bit larger in size and strength and were able to work with such large pieces.
A answer for these rough to smooth door and base facings is simple, South America has and always has been considered the father of Stucco. The deal is that stucco will not stick to smooth surfaces and why the doorways and bases are left smooth to allow a feather-edge to match the stucco applications to blend with a finished surface. In your video you can see this stucco mortar still in place in spots and pieces that rain had not touched all this time.
It was said that on one of those pilars was written in hyroglives that there was once a man who came from Kush who joined the Egyptian mystery school and who became a priest within the Egyptian mystery school and who was given the titel ..... Ab Rah Ham....(which suposed to mean "the human son of the God Rah...") and that this guy was the guy up on which the Abraham of the Bible was based up on (all tho the real Ab..Rah..Ham.. was nothing at all like the fictional Biblical Abraham). PS I can't read ancient hyroglives so take my words with a grain of salt.
@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 Well if you would actually do that then you would see that it doesn't make any sense, for the Biblical Abraham would be a great sinner and still he is considered a saint and a prophet.
@@rosewhite--- Adam and Eve?....really?? And I am the one drinking the kool aid?? Really?!.....Cheers! PS: let's say that Adam and Eve myth is true, aren't we all Grand childeren of Adam and Eve or only the Biblical Abraham??
I bet in a few thousand years time, all the cheaper smaller and crude workings will go or collapse leaving the magnificent stone work, along will come a new civilisation who will see it as A place for the gods, they will worship and try and rebuild it and the cycle continues, Great stuff Brien.
I'm 78, and have done stone work since my College days, 51 yrs ago, so I know some things about masonry.😉 These are dry stone walls & other works, which are the best choice in earthquake prone areas: wet masonry walls will collapse far in advance of dry, which allows for the movement needed to release wave energy. What REALLY bothers me is that we're told that these people had no metal other than gold and copper. Now I've never seen a copper stone chisel and I doubt I'll see one before I leave for the Beyond. Perhaps an archaeologist who is knowledgeable in this can do me a HUGE favour and let me know ASAP.
Great video Brien! Almost impossible to figure what's going on in some of these constructions like at 6:15. There's at least four different types of building materials employed but it looks as though it was all constructed, or reconstructed better to say, at the same time. It's nonsensical. Beautiful and impressive, but nonsensical.
If you went to a modern day quarry you would find the powder you'd need it's a miniscule amount compared to the Millions of Tons produced there, but that powder could be used. Perhaps as a sealer or filler if you had the right Technology for it...
The difference in cutting the stone as opposed to moulding a geopolymer should be easy to spot. If the stone contains quartz crystals for example , the crystals seen on the outer side will be milled flat instead of still being left whole if the stone was poured into a mould imo.
I agree that the Crystal is key, but the outer surface could've been subject to a unknown process there for a chipped off or even a broken block would be even better evidence...
I have been in construction most of my life ! The thought just occurred to me what if the people building these things suddenly lost their power source, the project would need to be finished because they were on a schedule and did not want to waste their progress, their life work would have been for nothing ! They continued their work with crude tools and manufacturing methods to get the job done !!
First of all then you very much for your commitment to share your videos about Ancient Mexico and the great cultures they were before the the spanish conquest. One important comment you did not do,Mitla was a mixed city about population since around 1000 a.d. because the Mixtecs and the Zapotecs were living together. Is very common that the archeologist when they make a restoration the finish is poor just to show to the public that it is not original, and specially in Mitla a lot of original stones went to build the church.Regards from NZ
It is amazing how many places have megalithic or ancient (really ancient) perfect stone work and nobody has pointed this out before now, it is so obviously different time periods and thank you Brien for your continued hard work, hopefully main stream archeology will catch up at some point, like the paleontologists did with the birds and dinosaurs, only took them over 100 years (I used to get so cross at museums telling everyone they were all reptiles!).
In order for leverage to have been used the object that you’re using as a lever must be as hard ,or harder preferably, as the object you’re trying to leverage. Also, the ground underneath would have to be as hard as the stone or it would go nowhere as your lever digs into the ground. Where we see the lentils supported by crude work, we believe it’s a facade with the original core intact...
One thing l noticed, the lintels that are on walls of mortar and stone have required shoring up as they are weak. While the lintels on finely cut large stone are not. Does look like a attempt to reproduce the original work.
Considering the earth is a few millions years old a lot of ancient civilizations have populated this planet, then they rediscovered plastic, 👹 end of that era!☺️ Judging by the basalt columns natural weathering they appear to be part of a much larger structure and many thousands of years old! Thank's for the video.
The evidence of cataclysmic damage to the megalithic blocks is shocking. And it seems obvious that the same culture that built the pyramids also did this construction in Mexico.
Before the “flood” (which is still happening by the way!) gravity and the atmosphere where very different we’ve been building on top of what once was for 10,000.... wtfu
Seems like the finely shaped stone is only ever on the first two layers in what look like were huge buildings. I wonder if the other layers were destroyed in earthquakes or taken apart and reused in smaller buildings?
It's laughable ,to me, that people just happens across these sites and clam to have been the people who have created them, finely shaped stone on the bottom, "rubble above!"
Yes it's fairly obvious and it's strange that Brian didn't mention it. those large beams many of them have three smooth perfect faces and then the bottom interface is obviously poured over the rough Stone underneath it and then solidified. no one is going to be carving contours in basalt in order to match the contours of rubble underneath it makes zero sense they're obviously cast
Doesn't one wonder what the 'Mother Culture' was that gave us megalithic building. Pyramids in mesoamerica with water features (cenotes) under them along with radiating tunnels. Then we have Egypt with the same or similar design.
Its possible more then one culture developed megalithic capability in the past, just like the modern world has nuclear technology spread (despite attempts at controlling it).
i am curious about your opinion on the conclusions of the documentation : the great pyramid K 2019.....you think it is possible they casted the megalithic stones etc? i would love to see a review/debunk video on all the claimed details.
I don't think that column is basalt, looks more like volcanic ash 'scoria' like and andesite or diorite... where Basalt is nearly solid black/green/purple aluminosilicates and is the heaviest and most dense rock on the planet... no air vesicles or air-pockets.... by strict definition it could be basaltic by mineral composition, yet, igneous rock is not porous, but volcanic such as pyroclastic ejecta from volcanoes usually does have these airpockets as a result of sudden depressurization by volcanic eruption.
@@brienfoerster That's good to know. I am looking at the mini, it is not the most expensive by no means but they are newer. I am a little worried I'll crash the thing right away. I see how well you fly it over the sites and it is amazing. I am still reading into them and a metal detector too ;) I am assuming you can use a smartphone to control them, I do not have one so does the controller work as good? What other items would I need other than spare parts and where in Ontario could I go, are there sites to visit here? I'd be happy to do it and upload it. Thanks for all your help Brien.
Thanks for continuing to upload these clips while you are in lockdown. Keep your head up, this will pass.
Sending love and thanks from MN - USA
Brien, your videos are wonderful, so refreshing to watch a well narrated video without music, thank you so much.
Awesome Brien. Thank you.
You have a wonderful mind, and a curious one. I love your work!
Research diy roman concrete in your search engine. You will be surprised how easy it is, and how strong and longlasting. Love your video tours!
Thanks for your videos, they allow us to explore right here in our homes.
Out of place artifacts are often overlooked...
Love this, amazing we can see the difference in work. Thank you
I love giant beans :-) . Seriously their is clear evidence around the world that our ancestors (?) used to find it easy to work with stone at the megalithic scale and proportion in a way that if we tried today would be ruinously expensive and resource intensive. This at a time when population was supposed to be much less. Even with plentiful food supplies this does not make sense. There is a missing piece in our understanding.
You're exactly right, there was a time when it didn't matter what size you were or how strong you were, the only thing that did matter was how much Physics you understood to get the job done...
they used dinosaurs, ever watch fred flintstone ?
I agree John North. There are missing pieces.
You can always tell the cuckoos...
@@rosewhite--- but didn't god do the same thing and have jesus ???
Much respect....
tHEY LOVED THE ANCESTORS AND BUILT TO PRESERVE THESE SIGHT FOR A FUTURE CULTURE THAT COULD UNDERSTAND THEM.
Thanks buddy awesome didn’t know there was so much megalithic stuff in Mexico And my wife is Mexican
It was a global civilization, blows my mind
@@AlaskaPirates people these days think they know everything 95% percent of people have never even heard of this stuff personally Iam Completely obsessed with this megalithic stuff from history we know nothing about yet was obviously pretty advanced more than we work out anyway.
@@87mrreynolds right! I travel to ruins too, it’s my favorite part of travel honestly, I am also a builder, so it it of particular interest to me. You can’t tell me that the history we are taught is anywhere close to correct. There is no explanation for the things that I have seen and touched. It truly is an interesting world we live in.
@@AlaskaPirates I’ve been interested in this for so long I’ve tired showing pictures to my friend who’s a builder thinking maybe he be interested and my ex partner who’s still my good friend I talked to her about it at length but you can’t make someone become interested in This stuff and I hate talking to someone about it who you can see are not actually interested
If Megalith builders were around now, they would be making BILLIONS of dollars, if not TRILLIONS.
True. These megalithic works all over the world represent an enormous investment of time and labor.
@@jamespayne8781 check Coral Castle on wiki^^
You are thinking in your terms, not theres Nothing moves in the USA unless a buck is turned. They probably had a different system.
@@TheDAT9 Agreed - the ancient builders were using advanced technology and methods - we have no idea what else they had advanced. I'm sure medicene, physical, mental, spiritual health would be equally advanced. They may have figured out how to motivate the world without a buck too!
The builders or engineers of megalithic structures are here, today.
They existed on Earth, before we did.
One of the names we call them is Reptilian, sometimes, Aliens.
The cult of Christ references them as Fallen Angels.
where there are megalithical construction, you need to look underneath. seems like subterranean infrastructure is the norm, rather than the exception.
yeah. im pretty sure..there are whole cities underneath. Just dig 30-90 feet...and you ll find a lot of answers. They arent digging deep enough
@@HighterTV Because they assume 30-90 feet is millions of years old, and there couldn't possibly be advanced stonework. Its complete dogma.
@@JohnBusakowski This is stupid ! Didnt they remove 30 feet of sand from the Sphinx? back in the days only the head was visible. And then EasterIsland...the figures were buried to their neck...they dug it free and see..wow...its not only a head its a full body..TAKE THIS SCIENCE !! :D
@@HighterTV Yep - Basic reasoning for all of this is the disbelief that there was a recent global cataclysm 11,600-12,800 years ago that essentially reshaped HUMAN POPULATION as we know it. Not only do we need to dig on land, but we need to actually organize dive teams in near coast ocean depths of up to 300'; the level of oceans pre meltwater pulse 1a and 1b.
@@rosewhite--- I've read that rats were accidentally introduced which rampaged the soft wood on the island
Excellent observations as always.
Thanks for this interesting tour Brien. I am amazed at ancient history and architecture.
That looks like volcanic tuff, which is much softer than basalt. Notice all the holes from the gas pockets when it solidified.
Basalt too.
Basalt that Forms close to the surface or near water...
@@steve-o6413 The quarry is at the surface
air pockets look like conc work today when u dont 'rod' the conc when poured. those columns look like they were poured using forms. rounded tops? fred and barney didnt crawl out of a cave and suddenly become civil eng's. and talented const techs here or anywhere else, worldwide. past theories about all this type const and methods used are ludicrous. they had advanced eng and tech help from somewhere, and i think i know where. the truth that cannot say its name. if anywhere proof exists it is surely right here, and in other mega-sites all over.
@@brienfoerster how long has the Site been quarried..?
Megaliths in Mexico...I noticed a few in the structures at Coba and Chichen Itza when I visited a few months ago...however nowhere near as large as the lintels here in Oaxaca, a place I heard many great things about on my trip.
It’s really uncanny; the lintels seemed to be shaped by the same builders as the foundation blocks in the structure. It follows that other builders came along and built rough walls upon the foundation wall. What’s strange is that the level of ingenuity needed to place those lintels so perfectly doesn’t match the skill level in the middle of the wall however that middle wall was obviously built by the same people who installed the lintels. If not, now we’re talking 3 different stages of building and that becomes an even more unlikely scenario.
These lintels are most likely leftover pieces from the original builders after some cataclysm...but that raises yet another question: If there was a cataclysm where are the rest of the stones of the original structure?
Perhaps the original building(s) fell due to cataclysm...then those pieces were used to build the foundation of a much larger structure...that those perfectly fit foundation stones only seen in the first/second course may exhaust the total amount of stones from the original structure leaving only the lintels left. This theory also somewhat precariously assumes that these second builders had enough skill to lay these pieces of ashlar perfectly just like their predecessors.
Every theory seems to hinge on a number or unlikely assumptions.
Hmmmmmm.....
As a mason. I don’t usually buy into theories about people removing stones from ancient sites and transporting them to build elsewhere for a number of reasons.
These sites you show here in southern Mexico, like most sites around the world, really leave you wondering what happened...to erect and place those lintels and then construction halts? Like Sasqawaman in Peru, the grand yet incomplete nature of these sites is simply baffling.
Thanks again for your work...
Funny you claim to be a Mason, but you never heard the term used brick. Highly sought out back in the 70's for building walls, pilasters and pavers. I always thought it was a common practice...
@@steve-o6413 i mentioned stone and ancient sites and somehow you conflate that with ‘bricks’ in the ‘70’s’ ? Your comment hardly warrants a response brother
It’s amazing how much weathering difference when your under the lintels....
The superior stonework could have been the result of a multigenerational mason family who perfected their art and protected their secrets.
The last family had only one son and he wanted to be a dentist, all was lost.
As if...
Most native cultures were meticulous record takers. if we hadn't burned all the books we would have answers.
Would love to take that tour with you some day. Price is very reasonable.
Iam a 38 year old man who’s obsessed with this kind of stuff yet never met anyone who cares or knows anything about it but Iam promise my self to go on one of these tours as soon as This lockdown madness is over Iam guessing other people won’t mind me chatting with them I hope I must go it’s my life’s goal and my main hobby and interest
Those pillars of basalt at the beginning of the video, look like lingams.
But are not
Exactly
Yes they do.
What does your geologist say about the weathering of those basalt columns? If that is truly hard basalt, then they look to be aged by the tens of thousands of years.
Heat I imagine
Its called cribbing, and levering up with further cribbing under the lifted stone edges.
3:36, i'm so glad someone remembered to bring his devil sticks to the megalithic temple
It's interesting how the Lintels aren't centred perfectly. What's up with that?
The steps at, 06:45 seem to be a bit too high for a staircase. Unless you are a lot taller.
@Frosty31 ... I always look at the stairs for clues.
How far below grade do the walls extend to their true foundations? It's possible that we're seeing the tops of walls and the beams were simply raised and the crude walls built to fill the gaps. I've seen nothing to show the actual foundation stones of any of the world's megalithic sites.
look again the ones in this video are on top of rubble
Absolutely Correct. Three Previous Civilizations upon the Earth and this current world, the Fourth, aka: the kingdom of iron.
1:10. That design at the top of the wall look exactly like the nikola tesla valve patent.
It does have a resemblance to the oneway valve...
It also looks like a Kelvin- Helmholtz cloud formation
Looks like megalithic concrete.
Looks like but is not.
@@brienfoerster Maybe it's very old concrete not the same we have today. When there are no machining marks.
@@McDaniel77 unlikely
9:11 Look at the inward notch in the middle of the beam, so they can puzzle together more tightly. Reminds me of the beams in the Osirion of Abydos.
Much appreciated ! Blessings
Tks yr vids r great and narration vr clear‼️👏✌️💐
If we don’t know, imagine the guys who where doing the ‘rough work’ wondering how on Earth they can’t do the same block work...!
hahaha, i was thinking the same, worst, the king probably said off with your head if you can't do it, amazing to think 1000s years ago had tech to do this...
Stone technology. A pounder chisel rock is harder than the basalt.
A pound of feathers is lighter than a pound of stone.
@@brucepedersen4032 such an ignorant comment
It is interesting to think about what would have been plastered. You could have nice stonework on bottom and top with crude in the middle if you were going to plaster the middle anyway. I think this makes for an aesthetically pleasing design.
Hi Brien, this place is amazing, can you record a video from the graves inside Mitla? All the original ancient megalithic structure is underfloor.
It’s almost like the original builders came back after these tribes left and put all the megalithic stones on the top of everything. My brother thinks that the original builders might have been quite a bit larger in size and strength and were able to work with such large pieces.
A answer for these rough to smooth door and base facings is simple, South America has and always has been considered the father of Stucco. The deal is that stucco will not stick to smooth surfaces and why the doorways and bases are left smooth to allow a feather-edge to match the stucco applications to blend with a finished surface. In your video you can see this stucco mortar still in place in spots and pieces that rain had not touched all this time.
Like erosion; the rocks weathering has got to be in 10's of thousands of years or more to be that rough
Those columns remind me of Egyptian temples that had courtyards of columns in line...😉
It was said that on one of those pilars was written in hyroglives that there was once a man who came from Kush who joined the Egyptian mystery school and who became a priest within the Egyptian mystery school and who was given the titel ..... Ab Rah Ham....(which suposed to mean "the human son of the God Rah...") and that this guy was the guy up on which the Abraham of the Bible was based up on (all tho the real Ab..Rah..Ham.. was nothing at all like the fictional Biblical Abraham).
PS I can't read ancient hyroglives so take my words with a grain of salt.
@@dekatvanlilith6494 , and you apparently cant read the Word of Yehovah. Go ahead and read it thru.
@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 Well if you would actually do that then you would see that it doesn't make any sense, for the Biblical Abraham would be a great sinner and still he is considered a saint and a prophet.
@@rosewhite--- Adam and Eve?....really?? And I am the one drinking the kool aid?? Really?!.....Cheers!
PS: let's say that Adam and Eve myth is true, aren't we all Grand childeren of Adam and Eve or only the Biblical Abraham??
@@rosewhite--- , seriously.
I bet in a few thousand years time, all the cheaper smaller and crude workings will go or collapse leaving the magnificent stone work, along will come a new civilisation who will see it as A place for the gods, they will worship and try and rebuild it and the cycle continues, Great stuff Brien.
no one believes so they do nothing and soon there wil be nothng they can do
@@rosewhite--- what about the annunaki ?
@@rosewhite--- do you believe in santa claus ?
@@rosewhite--- deities=gods...
I'm 78, and have done stone work since my College days, 51 yrs ago, so I know some things about masonry.😉
These are dry stone walls & other works, which are the best choice in earthquake prone areas: wet masonry walls will collapse far in advance of dry, which allows for the movement needed to release wave energy.
What REALLY bothers me is that we're told that these people had no metal other than gold and copper. Now I've never seen a copper stone chisel and I doubt I'll see one before I leave for the Beyond.
Perhaps an archaeologist who is knowledgeable in this can do me a HUGE favour and let me know ASAP.
these are often times found below surface
Yes foundations or corner stones...
Great video Brien! Almost impossible to figure what's going on in some of these constructions like at 6:15. There's at least four different types of building materials employed but it looks as though it was all constructed, or reconstructed better to say, at the same time. It's nonsensical. Beautiful and impressive, but nonsensical.
Thanks for the new views, Brien!
At 10:44 the ground is giant blocks? Or is it just plaster that looks blocky?
how did they govern their mag driven sound suspension lathe and did they have a wireless crane brien?
@@rosewhite--- Fail 🤣🤦
Right on the money! The bottom where much much older structures my teacher said probably 2 thousand years but no body believes ,
Brien I know you always hear everyone say they love your work etc, we do. But what we could really use is some good arguments against geopolymers.
You have to be able to grind the stone to a consistency of flower; not easy.
If you went to a modern day quarry you would find the powder you'd need it's a miniscule amount compared to the Millions of Tons produced there, but that powder could be used.
Perhaps as a sealer or filler if you had the right Technology for it...
The difference in cutting the stone as opposed to moulding a geopolymer should be easy to spot. If the stone contains quartz crystals for example , the crystals seen on the outer side will be milled flat instead of still being left whole if the stone was poured into a mould imo.
I agree that the Crystal is key, but the outer surface could've been subject to a unknown process there for a chipped off or even a broken block would be even better evidence...
I have been in construction most of my life ! The thought just occurred to me what if the people building these things suddenly lost their power source, the project would need to be finished because they were on a schedule and did not want to waste their progress, their life work would have been for nothing ! They continued their work with crude tools and manufacturing methods to get the job done !!
First of all then you very much for your commitment to share your videos about Ancient Mexico and the great cultures they were before the the spanish conquest. One important comment you did not do,Mitla was a mixed city about population since around 1000 a.d. because the Mixtecs and the Zapotecs were living together. Is very common that the archeologist when they make a restoration the finish is poor just to show to the public that it is not original, and specially in Mitla a lot of original stones went to build the church.Regards from NZ
thanks
There are some cruciform underground "tombs" in Tlacolula Oaxaca. Look them up, they are closely related to Mitla.
It is amazing how many places have megalithic or ancient (really ancient) perfect stone work and nobody has pointed this out before now, it is so obviously different time periods and thank you Brien for your continued hard work, hopefully main stream archeology will catch up at some point, like the paleontologists did with the birds and dinosaurs, only took them over 100 years (I used to get so cross at museums telling everyone they were all reptiles!).
In order for leverage to have been used the object that you’re using as a lever must be as hard ,or harder preferably, as the object you’re trying to leverage. Also, the ground underneath would have to be as hard as the stone or it would go nowhere as your lever digs into the ground. Where we see the lentils supported by crude work, we believe it’s a facade with the original core intact...
Brien, that large beam that was either placed or fell. If it fell wouldn’t there be some signs of trauma?
Good video! 😎👍
One thing l noticed, the lintels that are on walls of mortar and stone have required shoring up as they are weak. While the lintels on finely cut large stone are not. Does look like a attempt to reproduce the original work.
Maybe want to see a architect. They can splain you on building techniques.
Hehhehe...
an*
Considering the earth is a few millions years old a lot of ancient civilizations have populated this planet, then they rediscovered plastic, 👹 end of that era!☺️ Judging by the basalt columns natural weathering they appear to be part of a much larger structure and many thousands of years old! Thank's for the video.
Ben and Brien are the kings of ancient megaliths.
The evidence of cataclysmic damage to the megalithic blocks is shocking.
And it seems obvious that the same culture that built the pyramids also did this construction in Mexico.
Before the “flood” (which is still happening by the way!) gravity and the atmosphere where very different we’ve been building on top of what once was for 10,000.... wtfu
Seems like the finely shaped stone is only ever on the first two layers in what look like were huge buildings. I wonder if the other layers were destroyed in earthquakes or taken apart and reused in smaller buildings?
How can I contact you sir? I have some interesting finds near by those places!
It's laughable ,to me, that people just happens across these sites and clam to have been the people who have created them, finely shaped stone on the bottom, "rubble above!"
Absolutely we are the Reset civilization
Geopolymer technology on the large stones.
Yes it's fairly obvious and it's strange that Brian didn't mention it. those large beams many of them have three smooth perfect faces and then the bottom interface is obviously poured over the rough Stone underneath it and then solidified. no one is going to be carving contours in basalt in order to match the contours of rubble underneath it makes zero sense they're obviously cast
Any evidence of heat damage? That term “rubble “ seems ominous.
Great job...
In México the idea of challenging the oficial history is forbidden.
6:02 They were skateparks!
If I had $3, I would make faces at the bank. LOL!
yes reused the lintel if that was they was use for.. they are the wrong way up...
Can anyone explain why these mega stones have this porous look to them all the time? Are these concrete style created originally?
fine work at the bottom..... setting on rough stones !!!
I was wondering why I haven't seen u go live😒 turns out RUclips turned off all notifications 🤔 I just changed it back🤷
I think it is obvious that the older stones are the most well honed. What do you all think>? My guess.. 20 thousand years? Maybe 100.
did a cataclysm burn the glass, wood and metal
Those rounded top columns look a lot like Hindu Lingams!
Amazing. Ta.
Does the foundation/floor represent a 4th civilization where the technology is inferior?
6:00 Is that a ball court?
Doesn't one wonder what the 'Mother Culture' was that gave us megalithic building. Pyramids in mesoamerica with water features (cenotes) under them along with radiating tunnels. Then we have Egypt with the same or similar design.
Its possible more then one culture developed megalithic capability in the past, just like the modern world has nuclear technology spread (despite attempts at controlling it).
i am curious about your opinion on the conclusions of the documentation : the great pyramid K 2019.....you think it is possible they casted the megalithic stones etc? i would love to see a review/debunk video on all the claimed details.
Junk I think
That Cartoon : ) ha,ha,ha lol...
Even at a mile away that was quite a feat getting them there.
everytime i watch Briens videos...there is one point i always disagree...the estimated weight of the stones. Im pretty sure its less in most cases
Working with small stone is more advanced....easier to move.
I don't think that column is basalt, looks more like volcanic ash 'scoria' like and andesite or diorite... where Basalt is nearly solid black/green/purple aluminosilicates and is the heaviest and most dense rock on the planet... no air vesicles or air-pockets.... by strict definition it could be basaltic by mineral composition, yet, igneous rock is not porous, but volcanic such as pyroclastic ejecta from volcanoes usually does have these airpockets as a result of sudden depressurization by volcanic eruption.
2 giant lingums , made of basalt, wow
Hi Brien. Can you tell me how long it took to learn how to fly your copter Pachacutec, Horus and Paracas? Is it a tough learning curve?
The newest ones are the easiest
@@brienfoerster That's good to know. I am looking at the mini, it is not the most expensive by no means but they are newer. I am a little worried I'll crash the thing right away. I see how well you fly it over the sites and it is amazing. I am still reading into them and a metal detector too ;) I am assuming you can use a smartphone to control them, I do not have one so does the controller work as good? What other items would I need other than spare parts and where in Ontario could I go, are there sites to visit here? I'd be happy to do it and upload it. Thanks for all your help Brien.
@@chaosXshaman just read all the documentation and make sure to fly in an open area with no wind the first few times
@@captainTubes thanks, I will try and avoid roads. I am excited about it
geopolymer beams and columns
Alienigens work side to side with the humans to build that city, share many things before they die or live..
At first glance the only word I saw was Malta
Even though it is pocked like limestone?
at the beginning those decorations on the stone look like the tesla valve. wierd. someone should examine them mathematically.
I-can handle listening to this Kiwi sometimes, I'd 'REALLY' like to hear his whole world view, unedited...
*facepalm* dude... the reason for rough walls was they were covered with plaster similar to riman frescoes. not seperate build dates -.-
iF THEY CAN CARVE IT MOVE ALL THE WAY TO THE SIGHT I'M SURE IT WAS NO PROBLEM MOVING IT 8 FEET UP.
What got me about Mitla , was that the church was clearly made from stones , that came from another structure . The nerve of the christians .
Pre inca and inca history în stone.
It looks like concrete rather than cut stones