this is a useful benchmark not a benchmark for unrealistic situations such as the pairing r5 2600 with rtx 4090 which is pointless info to almost every users
@@CL-jq1xs It is not about unrealistic situations, it is about comparing the performance of the two CPUs in question. It is a important information specially for longevity because you can see how much the CPU will be performing as the games get more demanding over time.
@@CL-jq1xsNo, this test with weak gpu card. Medium card like 3060 (6600) will be enough, and you can see real difference between these two proceccors in games, almost 100% fps) This test is not right, because first processor show all he can do, but another processor cant do it, because videocard can't show more fps
@@Tales541this test is unrealistic situation. First processor do its maximum, but another processor cant show all power because this videocard already dont allow it to arrive this power. And you think the difference is about 50%, when real difference is almost 100% if you ll take medium videocard like 3060
the comparison that i need, im upgrading to a higher processor with rx5600xt, im thinking that maybe the ryzen 5 2600 is enough. then this video came, turns out the 2600 is enough for rz5600xt. i just wished there is red dead redemption 2 in here or genshin and god of war. thank for the vid
Всем привет! Спасибо за сравнение. Вопрос по температурам... 2600 65-72°С, 5600 48-53°С это действительно такая разница? Просто думаю поменять на свой 2600 на 5600 и как то в некоторых играх всего пару кадров выигрывает 5600. Кто нибудь скажите, 5600 реально холоднее чем 2600 как на видео?
5600 выигрывает не пару кадров. Просто автор тестил видюху, а не процы. Я 2600 на 5500 заменил и в играх которые упирались именно в проц, исчезли статоры и ФПС вырос на 15-20 кадров.
@@murkinsquish6467 the test work because this is a common pairing of the CPU and GPU. CPU and GPU benchmark such as pairing the r5 2600 with a rtx 4090 is pointless to most people.
Yes, it's gpu bottlenecked. But remember this test was done when the ryzen 5600 first dropped its price and newer gpus were very expensive due to shortage and gpu mining. There were a lot of ryzen 2600 users back then who are using previous gen/older gpus. This test shows if its worth upgrading to a 5600 from a 2600 even when using a weaker gpu. Not all users with low/midrange system specs are capable of pairing it with a 3090 to show the true gap between this cpus.
@@CL-jq1xs as the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU, the benchmarks here serve no real purpose of comparison between 2 GPU (which is the whole point of a benchmark), as the result is inherently biased.
@@a_d_z_y__ people don't pair a r5 2600 with a rtx4090 in reality. People also don't make upgrade from a r5 2600 to r5 5600 with a rtx4090 as well. Why would that info be useful to most people who are never going to pair a CPU and GPU with such a difference in price category in the first place? This type of benchmark is more useful for people in general.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Even at this time, it's a very worthwhile experiment for gamers looking to buy low- to mid-range parts used.
This is a gpu benchmark bot a cpu, in most of the games gpu was on 99% so it was slowing down the cpu
CSGO is relevant tho. It's very heavy on the CPU and does not care much about the GPU.
this is a useful benchmark not a benchmark for unrealistic situations such as the pairing r5 2600 with rtx 4090 which is pointless info to almost every users
@@CL-jq1xs It is not about unrealistic situations, it is about comparing the performance of the two CPUs in question. It is a important information specially for longevity because you can see how much the CPU will be performing as the games get more demanding over time.
@@CL-jq1xsNo, this test with weak gpu card. Medium card like 3060 (6600) will be enough, and you can see real difference between these two proceccors in games, almost 100% fps)
This test is not right, because first processor show all he can do, but another processor cant do it, because videocard can't show more fps
@@Tales541this test is unrealistic situation. First processor do its maximum, but another processor cant show all power because this videocard already dont allow it to arrive this power. And you think the difference is about 50%, when real difference is almost 100% if you ll take medium videocard like 3060
дружище, у тебя в большинстве игр система упирается в видеокарту.. Как так можно снимать сравнение процессоров??
the comparison that i need, im upgrading to a higher processor with rx5600xt, im thinking that maybe the ryzen 5 2600 is enough. then this video came, turns out the 2600 is enough for rz5600xt. i just wished there is red dead redemption 2 in here or genshin and god of war. thank for the vid
A lot of footage here is GPU bottlenecked, which is not ideal since we are comparing the performance of CPUs.
Всем привет! Спасибо за сравнение. Вопрос по температурам... 2600 65-72°С, 5600 48-53°С это действительно такая разница? Просто думаю поменять на свой 2600 на 5600 и как то в некоторых играх всего пару кадров выигрывает 5600. Кто нибудь скажите, 5600 реально холоднее чем 2600 как на видео?
Автор месяц назад ответил под комментарием ниже.
5600 выигрывает не пару кадров. Просто автор тестил видюху, а не процы. Я 2600 на 5500 заменил и в играх которые упирались именно в проц, исчезли статоры и ФПС вырос на 15-20 кадров.
@@beidokФакты. В ютубе есть более правильное сравнение, где видно как 2600 задыхается на фоне 5500.
how is it possible to get lower temp on higher cpu series? :D iam thinking to change my 2600 to 5600 too
The 2600 uses the stock cooler, that's why temp is higher.
@@useyour_pc8246 ahhhh thank you
Ryzen 5600 is bottleneck with rx 5600 xt. Maybe,it is need rx 6700 xt.
Yes, that's the point of this comparison. If there is a big gap on games when the system is gpu bound.
The test doesn’t work if the GPU is the bottleneck. You aren’t maximizing either CPU if the GPU is the weak link.
no, 2600 is bottleneck to this gpu not 5600 hahahah did u watch the video, 2600 cant boost gpu to 99%, for 5600 its easy
@@murkinsquish6467 the test work because this is a common pairing of the CPU and GPU. CPU and GPU benchmark such as pairing the r5 2600 with a rtx 4090 is pointless to most people.
2x16gb ram or 4x8gb ram?
2x16gb
GPU?
Rx 5600 XT
lol Test 5600XT
You're bottlenecked by your GPU unfortunately, I'm sorry but this test isn't really relevant, except to demonstrate what a bottleneck is.
Yes, it's gpu bottlenecked. But remember this test was done when the ryzen 5600 first dropped its price and newer gpus were very expensive due to shortage and gpu mining. There were a lot of ryzen 2600 users back then who are using previous gen/older gpus.
This test shows if its worth upgrading to a 5600 from a 2600 even when using a weaker gpu. Not all users with low/midrange system specs are capable of pairing it with a 3090 to show the true gap between this cpus.
@@useyour_pc8246 do you think you could add this context in the title or the description? Because I'm sure it could confuse some beginners out there
@@a_d_z_y__ beginners have no use for gpu and cpu benchmarking. This is actually more useful to beginners.
@@CL-jq1xs as the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU, the benchmarks here serve no real purpose of comparison between 2 GPU (which is the whole point of a benchmark), as the result is inherently biased.
@@a_d_z_y__ people don't pair a r5 2600 with a rtx4090 in reality. People also don't make upgrade from a r5 2600 to r5 5600 with a rtx4090 as well. Why would that info be useful to most people who are never going to pair a CPU and GPU with such a difference in price category in the first place? This type of benchmark is more useful for people in general.
amazing comparison!
Great comparison
Научись делать тесты.Тестируешь процессор по названию,а по факту видеокарту.Бред полный.