Видео

@@IjanMahqina-g4e Yes. System was plugged in a kill a watt to measure power draw.

@@useyour_pc8246 Can you help me show if the min frequency is 700 and max 2700mhz with a voltage of 1100mv, is it undervolt and how much power consumption is reduced? sorry because I don't have measuring tools and I just tested and it is better than stock

Yes, it's gpu bottlenecked. But remember this test was done when the ryzen 5600 first dropped its price and newer gpus were very expensive due to shortage and gpu mining. There were a lot of ryzen 2600 users back then who are using previous gen/older gpus. This test shows if its worth upgrading to a 5600 from a 2600 even when using a weaker gpu. Not all users with low/midrange system specs are capable of pairing it with a 3090 to show the true gap between this cpus.

@@useyour_pc8246 do you think you could add this context in the title or the description? Because I'm sure it could confuse some beginners out there

@@a_d_z_y__ beginners have no use for gpu and cpu benchmarking. This is actually more useful to beginners.

@@CL-jq1xs as the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU, the benchmarks here serve no real purpose of comparison between 2 GPU (which is the whole point of a benchmark), as the result is inherently biased.

@@a_d_z_y__ people don't pair a r5 2600 with a rtx4090 in reality. People also don't make upgrade from a r5 2600 to r5 5600 with a rtx4090 as well. Why would that info be useful to most people who are never going to pair a CPU and GPU with such a difference in price category in the first place? This type of benchmark is more useful for people in general.

I didn't overclocked the vram. What's your hotspot temp? 90c is normal temp if your ambient temp is also high.

@@useyour_pc8246 Is this a normal temp for my rx 6600 xfx gpu? Gpu main temp 58 deg while the hot spot temp is 77-81 deg while playing ff7 remake.

CSGO is relevant tho. It's very heavy on the CPU and does not care much about the GPU.

this is a useful benchmark not a benchmark for unrealistic situations such as the pairing r5 2600 with rtx 4090 which is pointless info to almost every users

@@CL-jq1xs It is not about unrealistic situations, it is about comparing the performance of the two CPUs in question. It is a important information specially for longevity because you can see how much the CPU will be performing as the games get more demanding over time.

​@@CL-jq1xsNo, this test with weak gpu card. Medium card like 3060 (6600) will be enough, and you can see real difference between these two proceccors in games, almost 100% fps) This test is not right, because first processor show all he can do, but another processor cant do it, because videocard can't show more fps

​​​@@Tales541this test is unrealistic situation. First processor do its maximum, but another processor cant show all power because this videocard already dont allow it to arrive this power. And you think the difference is about 50%, when real difference is almost 100% if you ll take medium videocard like 3060

I THINK GTX 1650 CONSUMES MORE THAN RX 6600

@@athenaluna3351 I have both now and have done a lot of comparison, using a wattmeter and what msi afterburner gives. And yeah. I agree. On idle, the GTX 1650 consumes more. Because the RX 6600 turns off its fans on idle and drops its consumption to something like 3w. The GTX 1650's fans will still run (albeit at a slower rate) on idle and the power consumption is somewhere around 5W. But when going full load/pushed, there's no contest. The GTX 1650 can't pull in more than 75W (and doesn't even pull that much most of the time. Whereas the RX 6600 can exceed 100W easy. Although the increased power consumption is more than justified with the amount of performance it can get per watt compared to the GTX 1650. But bear in mind that my GTX 1650 is the DDR5 version that does not require external power connectors, so it's really limited to the max 75W that the PCIE slot can provide. I have no idea what the power consumption is on the GTX 1650 GDDR6 version that requires external power.

did you increase power limit using morepowertools too? or just in adrenaline

No, just in adrenalin.

What's the min freq? 100- below the max or just at default?@@useyour_pc8246

did you change the minimum clock?

No, I left it at default. But I tried changing it to -100 mhz lower than max and saw no change in performance and power consumption on idle.

I'm looking for that answer too but I didn't find anything yet

Yes, that's the point of this comparison. If there is a big gap on games when the system is gpu bound.

The test doesn’t work if the GPU is the bottleneck. You aren’t maximizing either CPU if the GPU is the weak link.

no, 2600 is bottleneck to this gpu not 5600 hahahah did u watch the video, 2600 cant boost gpu to 99%, for 5600 its easy

@@murkinsquish6467 the test work because this is a common pairing of the CPU and GPU. CPU and GPU benchmark such as pairing the r5 2600 with a rtx 4090 is pointless to most people.

2x16gb

Rx 5600 XT

Автор месяц назад ответил под комментарием ниже.

5600 выигрывает не пару кадров. Просто автор тестил видюху, а не процы. Я 2600 на 5500 заменил и в играх которые упирались именно в проц, исчезли статоры и ФПС вырос на 15-20 кадров.

@@beidokФакты. В ютубе есть более правильное сравнение, где видно как 2600 задыхается на фоне 5500.

It is set on default.

Thank you! Cheers!

The 2600 uses the stock cooler, that's why temp is higher.

@@useyour_pc8246 ahhhh thank you

cê por aqui manin kkkkkkk, eu vi um cara nos comentários falando que a versão beta 23.1.2 tá dando mais fps, eu ainda n testei, mas lá pra mais tarde eu vou testar

@@mustx999 kkkk eae

@@mustx999 então consegui aqui instalar com o Gravador junto no software, mas fiz vários testes o dia todo usando DDU... E não obtive ganho algum na minha RX 570, instalei novamente o 22.11.2 q é o último pra ela já que não vão atualizar mais, o 23 nem veio... E com o avermine q rodou bf4 aqui na média de 100 fps o driver normal, 22.11.2 ficou com média de 110 e consumindo menos recursos...

@@mustx999 Achei melhor ficar com o original tudo clean mesmo...

Thanks for the information man

You also have rx 570 ? I tested 22.11 last night and I had 0 FPS boost. I have less FPS ALOT till shader cashe loaded new parts of the map, which never happened in AMD default drivers

@@ogi-wankenobi3638 I also have 570 but using 23.2.1

@@naikz187war4 ​ @Ancient Gameplays Tested a lot more and definitely 22.11 are not working for me but I have been testing beta 23.1.2 and those are much better. No issues, no FPS drops and I have gained small amount. 3.5fps on average in Witcher 3. 52 > 55.5. Small increase but its smoother

I just sold my RX 570, when I got time I will test 23.2.1 on my RX 580

@@useyour_pc8246 isteresting.. I have same rx580 8gb. waiting for your video

Bro !!!! You should consider trying the 23.1.2 version. Its absolutely amazing

@@naikz187war4 it has vRAM leaks no APUs

@@naikz187war4 what makes it amazing?

yep thats polaris so no point, anything before it's worth