Is The Garrett Vortex Any Better Than The Apex?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2025

Комментарии • 64

  • @TitusTolliver-uf4mo
    @TitusTolliver-uf4mo 19 дней назад +14

    When companies bring to market a product with bugs - it puts a great dent in the reputation of the firm and craters the image.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад

      Couldn't agree more. Hopefully Garrett will get the Vortex fixed.

  • @samsungcrossland2036
    @samsungcrossland2036 19 дней назад +11

    I was a garrett users and ran apex for 3 years and most of time I couldn't run muti it was unstable most of time so always use single frequency plus I always went off sound and tones rather then numbers And now I use minelab equinox and never looked back

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      Did you do the update on the Apex? When I did the update on the Apex it was more stable. Still the Equinox is a much better metal detector.

    • @samsungcrossland2036
      @samsungcrossland2036 12 дней назад

      @RelicsRings hi 👋 I never updated apex I still own machine but moved to nox so not used since

  • @jeffmcclendon3835
    @jeffmcclendon3835 20 дней назад +5

    Thanks for all of your work on the Vortex and Apex Andrew. What you are showing is basically what I am seeing too. The Vortex is just slightly deeper and more stable here than the Apex but I was hoping for much more. I just posted a topic on Detector Prospector about the VX9 Multi frequency notching and weird target IDs and maybe why that is. Look forward to your input.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  20 дней назад +1

      @jeffmcclendon3835 Thanks Jeff, I know you have been doing a lot of testing yourself. Appreciate your write ups.

  • @southernrelicadventures
    @southernrelicadventures 19 дней назад +4

    Good video ! The target IDs although better are to clumped together. Hopefully Garrett will get the issue resolved. The Apex definitely looked more in tune to what the Target IDs should be. Merry Christmas and stay in touch !

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  19 дней назад +1

      @southernrelicadventures Thanks, yea I think I personally like the Apex over the Vortex as it stands right now. Hopefully Garrett will make some changes. Happy Holidays

    • @MrBottlecapBill
      @MrBottlecapBill 19 дней назад +1

      Depends, if you switch modes the numbers change. If you frequency shift, the numbers changes. It's got some issues to work on.

  • @alleyoop5185
    @alleyoop5185 20 дней назад +5

    I’ve owned Garrett since the middle 90s but when I purchased a fisher cz6 a my MD life changed. My friends and I cleaned out the silver in local parks and to this day no matter which machine is used, very few silver signals are left:)

    • @MrBottlecapBill
      @MrBottlecapBill 19 дней назад

      Did you use any newer machines?

    • @alleyoop5185
      @alleyoop5185 19 дней назад

      @ I’ve used several since the cz. I used the white spectra v3i, minelab explorer 2, Garrett at max, and now the xterra pro which I haven’t used in the field yet. It’ll be interesting to see how it does. I’m pleased with so far just playing with it in my yard.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      I used the Fisher CZ 6a in the early 90's myself. Great machine back in the day.

  • @kevinncj22
    @kevinncj22 19 дней назад +6

    These machines seem years behind the other top brands on target ID.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  19 дней назад +4

      @@kevinncj22 i agree

    • @justinandsheba
      @justinandsheba 18 дней назад +1

      My Etrac is 12 years old and still blows these away. I was hoping for something better from Garrett these days, especially with them having White's intellectual property.

  • @ohiofredl
    @ohiofredl 19 дней назад +2

    Thanks for posting all the information and demonstration. Happy Holidays.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  19 дней назад

      @ohiofredl Thanks, Happy Holidays

  • @NHbeachmetaldetecting
    @NHbeachmetaldetecting 20 дней назад +3

    great video! happy holidays to your family and you!

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  20 дней назад

      @NHbeachmetaldetecting thanks and happy holiday to you too.

  • @Thetruthprevails1
    @Thetruthprevails1 19 дней назад +11

    I don't rate either , I'll stick to my Deus 2 . Good video thanks

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      Deus 2 is a great metal detector, have one myself.

  • @donaldphelps536
    @donaldphelps536 19 дней назад +6

    At this point I still see no reason to buy a Garrett, they are very lacking compared to other detectors of similar price range. It would be nice if they would come up with a higher end machine that competes with other really good machines.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  19 дней назад +3

      @donaldphelps536 i was hoping they would release a top tier machine. Maybe next time

  • @ibanezrg470
    @ibanezrg470 19 дней назад +3

    My first Garrett was the 400i,i found a gold ring on the first outing,multiple 18th to 21st century coins,loved it,still have it,i'm using the deus2 right now,but i still love that 400i,believe me Garrett will sort the gremlins,Peace out from Ireland.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад

      Yea hopefully Garrett will get the Vortex issues worked out.

  • @andy-p8s2r
    @andy-p8s2r 16 дней назад +3

    the multi frequency range of the vortex (imo) makes it a toy detector

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      Yes I hope they improve the frequency range with an update.

    • @Chuck-js8dy
      @Chuck-js8dy 10 дней назад +1

      It is a toy compared to the competition

    • @andy-p8s2r
      @andy-p8s2r 10 дней назад

      ​@@Chuck-js8dyyes exactly what i mean

  • @steelydan42
    @steelydan42 19 дней назад +3

    Nice video. Thank you and happy Hunting 👍👍

  • @Buttondigger
    @Buttondigger 19 дней назад +2

    A very big difference between the two. Thanks for that information.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  15 дней назад

      I hope it's helpful for you!

  • @m.a.4391
    @m.a.4391 19 дней назад +2

    Thank you for showing.

  • @internetcash-365
    @internetcash-365 19 дней назад +5

    A Vanquish 340 is better than both IMHO...

  • @misterbrent
    @misterbrent 20 дней назад +2

    No 53 or 54? I wonder how many other ID numbers are missing.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  20 дней назад

      @@misterbrent good question

    • @justinandsheba
      @justinandsheba 18 дней назад +1

      I actually saw a chart someone made. There are a lot of missing numbers and that's unacceptable.

  • @geoWhite
    @geoWhite 19 дней назад +2

    I hunt by the tone. I usually hunt woods or farmers fields. I don't really care if I dig a barber or indian. I dig it all . Do not hunt parks because most have been gone over a dozen times over the years.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад

      I agree in most cases I dig it all myself when on the beach or in the fields. Park hunters are going to need a more stable platform, so hopefully Garrett will get things figured out.

  • @МаксимМаксим-ц1й5м
    @МаксимМаксим-ц1й5м 16 дней назад

    Пожалуй не стоит менять AT MAX на vortex?

  • @pkgoldopalhunting
    @pkgoldopalhunting 19 дней назад +1

    great info vid mate

  • @Chuck-js8dy
    @Chuck-js8dy 19 дней назад +6

    Apex is better and that’s not saying much

  • @TNtreasurehunter
    @TNtreasurehunter 12 дней назад +1

    Apex has to be better because it has more buttons

  • @noepaulolaurentino4569
    @noepaulolaurentino4569 20 дней назад

    Boa noite.
    Podes fazer um resumo entre o vortex eo Apex?

  • @noepaulolaurentino4569
    @noepaulolaurentino4569 20 дней назад

    Qual é o melhor em profundidade?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      They're pretty equal in depth from what I'm seeing

    • @noepaulolaurentino4569
      @noepaulolaurentino4569 11 дней назад

      I undertand, than yor for your attention.

    • @noepaulolaurentino4569
      @noepaulolaurentino4569 11 дней назад

      Vi que tu tens vídeo com um mxesport. Foi o único detector que vi em vídeo no yutub.
      Com profundidade exelente.
      Chapa de 10x10 centímetros.
      A 1metro de profundidade .
      Será que o Apex ou o vortex.
      Conseguem?
      Em valores de compra semelhantes.
      800.dolar.+ou-

  • @jarutek6
    @jarutek6 9 дней назад

    GREAT....APEX VS VORTEX......

  • @Yakena1
    @Yakena1 19 дней назад +5

    Who in their right mind would buy a Vortex? My 20 year old Explorer 2 would out detect the Vortex with the default programs.

    • @alleyoop5185
      @alleyoop5185 19 дней назад +1

      @@Yakena1 I still use my explorer, it just gets heavier each year as I get older😂 but still one of the best detectors out there in my opinion.

    • @Yakena1
      @Yakena1 18 дней назад +3

      @@alleyoop5185 I chuckle to myself when I hear people say the Legend is heavy. The Explorer is over 5 lbs, and my bicep is larger on my swinging hand!

    • @justinandsheba
      @justinandsheba 18 дней назад

      100%. I run an Etrac to this day and it has never let me down in a dozen years. Hard to beat the Minelab FBS detectors.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  12 дней назад +1

      Hopefully Garrett can make some changes and make it more appealing. I had a number of Explorers from the XS to the SE and they were great detectors.

  • @peterleray6084
    @peterleray6084 19 дней назад

    your audio went out a quarter in.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  19 дней назад +1

      @@peterleray6084 weird I watched the video myself and didn't experience that.