TAMRON 70-180mm 2.8 REVIEW vs SONY 70-200mm 2.8 | DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY ON...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- TAMRON 70-180mm 2.8 REVIEW vs SONY 70-200mm 2.8 | DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY ON...
Download Sample RAW files Right here froknowsphoto....
Order the from Allen's Camera bit.ly/2SrNF9Y
Order from Amazon amzn.to/2WfuhhA
I took the Tamron 70-180 2.8 for Sony E Mount and the Sony 70-200 2.8 G Master out for a spin to get some sample images. Due to the current circumstances, I was only able to capture a few running photos with a dog as well as some portraits. Normally I would have probably taken photos of a baseball game or some sort of sport, but this is the best I could do right now.
With that said, I think I got exactly what I needed to get to do a comparison, especially knowing the price difference.
NEW FroPack 2 Lightroom Presets
froknowsphoto.... (40% off)
Download MyGearVault mygearvault.co...
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
___
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW Camera Bag bit.ly/2scQRt7
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts bit.ly/2vG2igB
My Go To Mirrorless Camera as of now
Sony a7R IV amzn.to/2PfcTaA
Sony a9 II amzn.to/2poUpdr
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Nikon Z6 bit.ly/2FcKsWJ
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
Nikon 70-200 2.8 bit.ly/2OBsjmY
Nikon 24-70 2.8 VR bit.ly/2LLHdsQ
Nikon 14-24 2.8 bit.ly/2LK1NtU
Nikon 105 F1.4 bit.ly/2vttwUq
Sony a7 III bit.ly/2n3HaK8
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►RUclips: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #REVIEW
Which would you go with and why????
cheaper
Tammy all day
The tamron. I cant afford the sony.
Didn’t hear the price yet, but I expect that Tamron will be way cheaper, so this will be my choice, because Tamron makes pretty good glass. But I‘m Canon user anyway and I will wait for the canon eos R6!!!
mega fro camera give away ?
The Tamron may in fact be one of the first examples where a Mirrorless camera setup finally sticks to its laurels of being lighter and smaller than equal DSLR setup. The fact that this doesn't require a tripod collar mount may be a first for a 2.8 in this range. Bravo Tamron, and I'm waiting for mine to finally arrive from Amazon.
By the way, I really appreciate that you use both imperial and metric units in your videos! Keep up the good work.
I cant afford either but still good to know!
Wow, another person like me. Hi not rich person! Good to see you!
@@Tigermoto hello friends lmao
Lee Butterworth don't worry, probably soon someone will buy the Tamron and not like it due to unrealistic reasons, and buying it used will be nice! After 2 months of the Nikon Z coming out I saw a 24-70 2.8 already used at my local cam shop. Just wait. But Tamron is killing it!!
Fro giveaway to the rescue
@@coltoncyr2283 I think I'd still have the Sigma 70-20p F2.8 sport.
Tamron image quality honestly looks superb, in my experience with the G-master, it's rather soft at 200mm when you aren't within its sweet spot focus range. Even in these photos, the Tamron looks a bit better to me. Let's hope for a masterclass v2 for the G-master, hopefully of the same quality as the 135 1.8!
I’m a sports shooter. I sold my Sony GM, and have this tamron on preorder. The 70-200 is never my “primary”, and I am usually shooting it one-handed on my second body (primary is on a monopod held with my other hand). It’s light weight will be welcomed. (I use only primes for indoor sports, btw.)
I saw someone else say something similar to this. They sold their 70-200 for a 70-180 to better swallow the cost of the 200-600.
I own both...the GM for the important shootings and the Tamron for travel...both are doing a fantastic job. Keep up your great content, Jared and greetings from Germany 🙋♂️
Glad you addressed the GM being overpriced; there's no reason that lens should still be $2600. Looks like the Tamron is gonna be the one to go with; cant pass up that price/performance ratio.
Same image quality ! More savings! Less heavy! I never take out my Sony70-200 out because of the weight! It’s just too much unless you use it on a tripod. So tamron all the way for sure!
For me it's easy, Tamron!, for a little more than the Sony lens, I was able to purchase a brand new Sony a7III and a brand new Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens, I'm really into sharpness, and the extra features that the Sony lenses offer, produce insignificant results in what I like about photography. Love! Tamron, been using them since my Pentax k1000 chrome film days, working on the trinity!
I’d rather spend 1,200 and get basically the same quality images
It seems like everyone compares the 2.8 Sony vs the 2.8 Tamron because they're both 2.8 lenses. Personally, I find the comparison between the Sony f4 and the Tamron 2.8 more interesting, because that's actually in the same scope of money.
Is the 2.8 better than the f4? And the tamron keeps pace with the GM so the stop less well probably put the Tammy far ahead.... And the Tammy cost less than the f4 still......
JustinDoesTriathlon it’s competing as a tool primarily with the 2.8, comparing off price is silly.
@@JustinDoesTriathlon are you sometyp of stupid !?! 2.8 is 2.8 Sony Does all the time price things .....samyang and Tamron is can do it better and cheaper lens why not sony!?
I just bought the Tamron and was thinking to sell my GM 70-200 . All these comparisions are sooo misleading ..The Tamron has definetly worse IQ in real life , trust me ! I gave a try at least but hell no and the lack of image stabilisation does come out below 1/100 ( can say goodbye to its sharpness ! )!!!
After watching your video, if I ignore the obvious differences, two things stick out. One, is confidence in your gear to get the image you want. A back focusing lens does not inspire confidence even if it occurs “occasionally.” The second thing is a lens is only of use if you carry it with you. If it’s too heavy or large to be with you, then it’s not much use. So with those two things in mind, the Tamron is the better choice for me.
Going with the Tamron since I am trying to find away to afford the Sony mirrorless system on a tight budget. Thanks for deciding it for me. Excellent presentation. Comprehensive but not a chore to watch. Appreciate the information.
I haven't noticed any focusing issues with my GM...in fact, I love using that lens on the rare occasion that it's appropriate for what I shoot. Its a really sharp lens.
it's inconsistent straight out of the factory for a $2600 US lens.You might get a good one or you can get a lemon.. The fluctuation are insane. Check lensrental on their 70-200 comparison reviews. They probably have several hundred 70-200 GMs
my guess is that they´re accidentally moving the focus ring with the hand that holds the lens, the focus ring is on even in autofocus modes
I think the Tamron looked slightly sharper.
And the winner is...
Pentax
I could have predicted that lol
Sure as hell ain't Bernie! lol
The winner is Sony 70-200 f4.0
@@AlexD12345 why the f4?
Very nice review! I would go with the Tamron for the much lighter weight and huge cost savings. Your sample photos clearly show the optical quality is totally on par in the real world with the Sony.
If you already have a high megapixel camera and dont want the GM put your camera in crop mode. You’ll basically have 180x1.5=270mm
True that. I’ve got the a7rii so crop is at 24mp still no complaints
Here is Tamron once again saving Sony's ass
By kicking Sony's ass
German Bueso Sony owns a chunk of tamron. They get money anyways
Was Sony in trouble?
I don't think they save any ass. Sony lenses are just the best on the market. Their price offend people and they hate them because they can't afford it.
No most people just don’t think it’s worth the extra money when they can buy excellent third party lenses for a fraction of the cost . In the end no will look at the photo and see if it was a Sony gm lens or third party ...and no one will care . But for some it’s worth it for different reason like weathersealing etc
“I prefer longer” hate when they tell that.
hahahaha
just tell them its all about the experience...
Longer in millimeters or a longer session? Sometimes it's easier to go longer when you're not carrying so much weight.
Wait do I understand this right?
I often heard it so big.
I'm definitely leaning towards the Tamron on this one. Thanks, this video has helped me think outside the box in terms of lens purchases.
From the technical point of view the AF system of a mirror less camera is a 'closed loop' system and the AF sensor is 'part' of the camera sensor. That means the the light path for measuring the the sharpness (quite complex camera related algorithms) and the light path for capturing the image is identical. In DSLRs the measurement of the sharpness has been done using phase detection arrays and the mirror was part of this light path … so in this case we do have two different light paths. And if these haven't been calibrated properly you ended up with back/front focus issues. Some adapters (e.g. LA-EA2) have build in phase detection arrays and as a consequence the AF system is 'using' a different light path again with the possibility of back/front focus issues. This is the reason why some cameras are offering build in calibration systems for lenses that need the phase detection arrays of the adapter.
With native e-mount lenses it is simply not possible to end up with a classic back/front focus issue. But of course the AF system can still fail to work as expected. But these failures are not related to the lens. Obviously the speed of the AF system in the lens is influencing the AF regulation loop error when shooting moving objects but on most modern lenses the speed of the AF system is not really the limiting factor (shutter speed is far more critical in most cases). The rest of problems are related to the algorithms that are used within the camera. Quantifying the sharpness is quite complex (in terms of the algorithms) and a higher f-stops the system/algorithms has to rely on the contrast only which is normally going hand in hand with a higher failure rate. Furthermore all algorithms that are quantifying the sharpness (and the resulting value is used to control the lens AF motors in a closed loop regulation system) need a specific minimum area (or minimum number of pixels) in order to end up with a quantifier for the sharpness of this area. If this area contains sever differences in depth you end up with a high probability of a missed focus because many algorithms are using a kind of 'optimizing the average sharpness within the area' approach. Modern algorithms are trying to specify the AF calculation area more 'precisely' by using pattern recognition algorithms (e.g. eye auto-focus) with the hope the AF control loop is using the eye only to calculate the control values for the AF motors. But e.g. wide open the eyelashes are definitely on a different focus level compared to the eye itself (we all know that). So if the area that is used by the camera to calculate the sharpness quantifier contains the eye AND the eyelashes it depends very much the area ratios, contrast, viewing angles, reflections in the eye, …. if the result is reflecting your expectations (and if your expectations are matching the 'priorities' of the algorithms … e.g. sometimes it's looking better if the focus is on the eyelashes).
In other words the AF system of an A7R4 is highly complex and mail fail from time to time. But for sure no native e-mount lens can show any systemic front/back focus issue. This is simply not possible (as in any other mirror less camera with native lenses). But the complex software algorithms that are the main part of all modern AF systems can fail … and believe me that there is still a lot of room for improvement (processor speed and related algorithms) …. and before you are asking … I am an electronic engineer in the medical business … so I am NOT developing cameras ;-) … but I know more than I want about sensor based regulation loops , pattern recognition … ;-) … so I am quite sure that a Sony developer would sign my 'theories' :-) ….
and before I forget … I LOVE the world of photography … and Jared is a hero of this world ;-)
For me, Tamron hits it out of the park with this one, but we need to wait for what Sigma brings out.
I highly doubt they’ll do anything aside from slap a Mc-11 into their 70-200 🤷🏻♂️
Yah I hope sigma comes out with their variant. Hurry up Sigma!!!
I have the sony GM, and have not had any issues with focusing. It is a very heavy lens though and you do feel it, so the lighter lens would be very much welcomed. However, I do appreciate the weather sealing on the GM and the ability to mount a mono-pod on the tripod collar. So my take away is, if you are the type who needs the superior build, you know who you are. If not go for the tamron as the image quality looks just as good.
I am still holding out for the sigma to release their Sigma 70-200 2.8 for e-mount. IDK HOW MUCH LONGER I CAN WAIT
I'm also waiting/hoping it comes out soon 😫😫😫
Any news yet? lol
Ive pulled the trigger yesterday and got an awesome deal :) €2200 brand new and a €200gift card + discount on accesoires.
@@kawasakimouse oh congrats. That's certainly a good price.
Just announced a release in December of this year.
I actually really like the lighting in the portraits 🤔 little bit unusual but really compliments her friendly approachable look
To get from 180mm to 200mm, you'd need to crop from 24mp to 19.4mp, so I'd say that's not too big of a loss considering the size and price.
Niklas Koskinen and if you are using the a7RIV...
no mention on how the camera bodies IBIS work with this lens. Thats the one thing I am interested in, can i shoot at 1/60 hand held, like I can with a 200mm lens with built in IS
Your neighbor has beautiful eyes...wow... Like always, great review... Amateur here with A7iii, should I grab that Tamron 70-180 or wait and see what Sigma comes with, then compare and make decision. I am in no hurry. Maybe that Tamron is just so good, anything else won't matter.
You could just rent it for awhile and wait for Sigma 70-200 to come out and make a verdict.
Nothing wrong with tamron. I only wish they send me a loaner to test one out lol thanks again Jared
The imaging was just as good. Get the Tamron or I'd wait for the Sigma Art version. I'd probably like it more than the Sony.
IMO the tamron is great travel lens. Size, weight is a must a d the fact the lens is sharp and f2.8 is just bloody amazing. I would buy the tamron over the sony as I am not a pro and do not have to worry about going to extreme locations.
How can a mirrorless camera lens back focus, I thought that was only a problem for DSLR's.
It missed, it focused behind the subject where I wanted. Don't know why, but it did.
@@froknowsphoto could it be a camera problem then? or just the focus point at the wrong location?
One recent example is Canon's RF 70-200mm. So the lens could be at fault too.
The problem was common in DSLR because the mechanism is more prone to misalignment.
Some mirrorless lenses do front or back focus. The Sony 70-200 GM is one of them. Manny Ortiz had the same findings with the Sony too.
the camera measures the scene and tells the lens where to go to be in focus
the lens then interprets this and moves the elements - if the intepretation or the elements are off then yes you can get missed focus.
What Mirrorless takes out of the equation is the camera step - where a DSLR AF system can also be "off" with its measurements
Great review Jared! Next time I'd like to see also the both comparison about chromatic aberrations and vignetting
The Tamron's autofocus is really bad in my experience. I don't know how that's not a deal breaker if you're in photojournalism, sports, wedding. Anything outside travel photography or portraits really.
did you get a fail product or all the lens are the same?
20:18 the distance to the left eye on GM site was bigger that why the focus point was on the right eye. On tamron site both eyes was at the same distance. Diferent angle thats all.
70200GM is the best lens sony ive ever tested (with A9)
Super video as usual, you mentioned a couple of times the future A7IV, any details on this camera?
I love Sony's AF but what I like even more is the range of amazing and affordable third party lenses you can get for the E mount for half the price of OEM of even less yet you are getting almost same performance. I bought the Sigma 24-70mm 2.8 and in the future will get the Tamron 70-180mm 2.8 mainly due to the size and weight, I am not so worried about loosing 20mm. If you want to get equivalent lenses for Nikon or Canon you have to buy OEM and pay so much more so big advantage to Sony (till Sigma and Tamron will get their lenses to work on the Z mount and RF mount).
I own the gmaster. Love the build quality, love the different stabilization models, customizable buttons etc. With that said, I rarely use it. Would I sell it to get the tamron? No. Would def trade it in if they came out with a V2 and would consider a sigma alternative. Also noticed the colors on the tamron are a bit warmer
They are warmer, same with tamron
20 mm 2.8 Vs Sony new 20 mm 1.8 mm
Been waiting anxiously for this comparison 😬
Can I ask you how can the Sony "back focusing" considering that we are talking about mirrorless?
its a piece of sh*t thats why
I assume it is while using AF-C with moving subjects.
It's tracking faces, if Bernie is standing with his back to the camera and there are 100 people behind him facing you then the camera will snap on one of those faces. He was probably using wide focus area too instead of clicking on Bernie. He didn't even switch face detection to animals when he shot his neighbor and dog, that's why some of the images were out of focus, the camera will then just snap to the closest point or largest moving point, be it the nose of the dog or it's body. You can have all of this equipment, but it doesn't make you a good photographer ;)
Why would you go by what some internet reviewer says ? Rent it and see for yourself. That’s what I did. Then I bought it.
Thank you for this review Jared. I downloaded the samples, saw you review in 4k , to my eyes, the Tamron has better image quality overall, and this review helped me make up my mind on this, I cant justify de cost difference just for the extra 20mm reach, and the extra money for the GM, plus the better look of the shots with the Tamron overall, so Tamron it is...
I am hoping to see a review of the Tamron 70-180 against the Sony 70-200 f4 lens. I think that a lot of people who own the f4 are wondering if it is worth it to buy the Tamron , the trade off being the lack of OSS and no tripod collar or custom switches for getting f2.8 . Unfortunately the size of the two lenses seem to be almost the same and the price point is not so far off from each other so now definite win there for the Tamron.
I would never buy the GM lens as it is more weight than I want to carry.
9:50 the vertical compression (head elongation) difference between the two is night and day, I didn’t think that was affected so significantly between 180mm and 200mm (that’s the kind of difference I’d expect between 40mm and 60mm). What’s the deal?!
Sony 70-200 f4 vs. Tamron 75-180? OSS and better build quality vs cheaper and an extra stop... I’m still undecided for portraits. If I’m upping the shutter speed to counteract the lack of OSS, is it worth it?
👋 Hi Jared! Are we see accurate exif data on the upper left corner of each side-by-side image? If so, why do both show Tamron 70-180?
I was caught by this too but it's the naming of the file not what lens was used. Check the 3rd row and you'll see what lens was used for the side by side.
Yup, I was wondering the same thing. I even screen shot it and blew it up to make sure thats what I saw.
3:20 “ it was back focusing" what is back focusing. Thank you for being do generous with your knowledge and skills
From the technical point of view the AF system of a mirror less camera is a 'closed loop' system and the AF sensor is 'part' of the camera sensor. That means the the light path for measuring the the sharpness (quite complex camera related algorithms) and the light path for capturing the image is identical. In DSLRs the measurement of the sharpness has been done using phase detection arrays and the mirror was part of this light path … so in this case we do have two different light paths. And if these haven't been calibrated properly you ended up with back/front focus issues. Some adapters (e.g. LA-EA2) have build in phase detection arrays and as a consequence the AF system is 'using' a different light path again with the possibility of back/front focus issues. This is the reason why some cameras are offering build in calibration systems for lenses that need the phase detection arrays of the adapter.
With native e-mount lenses it is simply not possible to end up with a classic back/front focus issue. But of course the AF system can still fail to work as expected. But these failures are not related to the lens. Obviously the speed of the AF system in the lens is influencing the AF regulation loop error when shooting moving objects but on most modern lenses the speed of the AF system is not really the limiting factor (shutter speed is far more critical in most cases). The rest of problems are related to the algorithms that are used within the camera. Quantifying the sharpness is quite complex (in terms of the algorithms) and a higher f-stops the system/algorithms has to rely on the contrast only which is normally going hand in hand with a higher failure rate. Furthermore all algorithms that are quantifying the sharpness (and the resulting value is used to control the lens AF motors in a closed loop regulation system) need a specific minimum area (or minimum number of pixels) in order to end up with a quantifier for the sharpness of this area. If this area contains sever differences in depth you end up with a high probability of a missed focus because many algorithms are using a kind of 'optimizing the average sharpness within the area' approach. Modern algorithms are trying to specify the AF calculation area more 'precisely' by using pattern recognition algorithms (e.g. eye auto-focus) with the hope the AF control loop is using the eye only to calculate the control values for the AF motors. But e.g. wide open the eyelashes are definitely on a different focus level compared to the eye itself (we all know that). So if the area that is used by the camera to calculate the sharpness quantifier contains the eye AND the eyelashes it depends very much the area ratios, contrast, viewing angles, reflections in the eye, …. if the result is reflecting your expectations (and if your expectations are matching the 'priorities' of the algorithms … e.g. sometimes it's looking better if the focus is on the eyelashes).
In other words the AF system of an A7R4 is highly complex and mail fail from time to time. But for sure no native e-mount lens can show any systemic front/back focus issue. This is simply not possible (as in any other mirror less camera with native lenses). But the complex software algorithms that are the main part of all modern AF systems can fail … and believe me that there is still a lot of room for improvement (processor speed and related algorithms) …. and before you are asking … I am an electronic engineer in the medical business … so I am NOT developing cameras ;-) … but I know more than I want about sensor based regulation loops , pattern recognition … ;-) … so I am quite sure that a Sony developer would sign my 'theories' :-) ….
and before I forget … I LOVE the world of photography … and Jared is a hero of this world ;-)
Missed focus and focused behind the subject. Sometimes happens to some lenses in mirror less cameras. If you need to nail focus every time, it’s a flaw.
4:04 Bro turned into Patrick from SpongeBob. 😂
Should have been a comparison between Tamron and Sony 70-200 f4.0 which for $200 more is the way better value. At about the same weight and size, it has image stabilization, internal zooming, customizable buttons, weather sealing, collar, and excellent image quality. And for this kind of a zoom f4 is just fine.
I already decided I’m just going with Tamron because of a few reasons. They are a better value, I can get 18 months 0% financing at my store with them, and they have a 6 year warranty which doesn’t normally mean much but SIX years is a long time for a warranty. Oh and broke college kid because I spend my money on camera gear
I have used the Canon 70-200 ii, f/2.8 on the a7iii with no problems and yes it is heavy but does that make it a reason to switch to the tamrom
Will you please do a follow up video going over the 70-180 with sports ?
If the Tamron had stabilization, game over. I mostly shoot video so sadly I’ll keep my f/4 only because of the stabilization. Wish I could afford the 2.8 but it’s massive on my fs7.
wasn't there an issue with the Sony 70-200 GM f/2.8 splitting in half? or was that the Sony 70-200 f/4?
What do you mean by "splitting in half"?
Sakari Jokinen. Someone during a video dropped the camera and lens off the tripod down a slope onto some rocks and the neck of the lens snapped. The lens mount stayed fixed in the camera so the camera wasn’t damaged. Hard to say if it should have survived the drop or not but the leverage on the lens neck would have been significant with a fairly long heavy lens.
I use an a6600 or a6400 to do my videos. What do you think of the Tamron for this kind of work? or is it too much lens? Thank you
Reasons I’ve pre-ordered the tamron and wouldn’t ever get the GM:
1. Price
2. I own the other two tamrons and love them, so was really keen to get the third.
3. Weight.
4. Size
With the majority of those reasons, I’m far far more likely to take the tamron out with me, whereas the size and weight of that GM would simply be too off-putting. The lack of 20mm at the long end really doesn’t bother me as it’s not significant and if I need extra reach, I’m most likely shooting football (soccer!) in which case I’ll probably use my a6600 for extra reach.
Just FYI at 12:18 don't think it was a lens issue. Left eye was probably out of focus on the Sony image because her face is turned at an angle. Would have required a higher Depth of Field. Her face is more straight on when you shot with the Tamron.
congrats on getting chistina applegate as a model
I wold love to see yours thoughts about Sony 70-200 F4 and the Tamrom 70-180 F2.8 for travelers?
Leonardo Prado same!
Dan Watson has all 3 on his review
Man, Tamron plays it beautifully! They release a "preatty much there as a 70-200" lens, but much smaller and cheaper. So now you have the option of buying the Tamron for tele versatility and a Prime lens for Portrait brilliance. Or you can get the Sony 70-200 and not switch lenses. You have the privilege of needing to be a well informed photographer for the best results. Thank you, Jared for this review. I'm not a Sony shooter, but still appreciated this review.
I’m really curious on the difference in reach in a sports setting like basketball or sideline football. Really wish the 120-300 from sigma would come out on e mount
I've heard a few people complain about GM's back focusing issue. Yikes.
Yeah. Kinda bummed.
And its expensive for that type of issue!
How is it even a thing? I thought mirrorless cameras don't have problems with FF/BF...
lens is also inconsistent coming out of the factory.
The Tamron’s make an excellent light weight set, the weight all 3 Tamron’s is only 214g more that the 2 shortest GM’S and this helps mirrorless keep the promise of lighter and smaller systems.I have 28 - 70 it’s brilliant even on A7R4. How great is it to have the choice.
On the subject of extra reach SONY WHERE IS YOUR 300 F/2.8 or 200 F/2 with a 1.4x converter. The 400 and 600 primes are gorgeous but 200 - 400 is massive step with no fast glass.
Hey Jared drop a manscaped discount code. I need help to tame the fro below!
I like the price of the lens, and as someone trying to crack into hockey photography, it has appeal, but looking forward to hearing your take on it when we're allowed into rinks again. Thanks for the video!
Love my 70-200 GM😉
Btw I’m a wildlife photographer so I find my 70-200 GM not too heavy compared to big guns like my 300mmf2.8 or my 150-600mm😉
Excellent review. What do you think about the lack of VC in the Tamron? Is that a cause for concern?
Jared can we get a comparison between the Sigma and Tamron 70-200 lenses for us Canon users?
Interesting review. Would’ve like a comment about how the Tamron stacks up against the 70-200 f/4 option, which is similar in price. It’s a slower lens but has OSS which makes up for a stop I think.
J M I agree!
Jared I need your help please should I buy this Tamron or the G2 version. Thank you!!!
I’m going to purchase the Tam 17-28 f2.8, the sigma 28-70 art 2.8 and I have been waiting for this 70-180 Tam most Bang for my buck. Also my family wants to thank you for the free covid download video I should send you a couple of the pictures my kids have done after watching your lessons. ( huge improvement) God Bless you and your unusually large hair.
Many Thanks
Walter aka The HairlessBigfoot
Hi Jared,
I noticed that the lens seems to be making a noise when it is not being used by the camera. From a vertical position, I rotated it 180 degrees (up is down, down is up). It feels like there are components inside that are loose. When the camera is on, this is not the case. Is this normal?
Cracking hair, and great knowledgem thank you. Just about to order the a7 iv after s5 for eye focus, This looks a good 'stop gap' after the kit lens for now. Quality looks awesome and most results are done in post, not pre.
Where are the giveaway winners
Would this lens be compatible with the 2x converter from Sony?
Been 11 months since you posted this... not sure if you are still watching the comments and replying. I have an opportunity to purchase the Sony 70-200. If you were to remove cost from the equation... would you take the Sony or Tamron with you to shoot sports / nature? How about for the occasional portrait shoot inside a building say for a wedding or maybe out at the beach during golden hour?
Also, from what I’ve read... no version II for the 70-200 is planned... have you heard different?
Regardless if you reply or not... thanks for all the work you put into providing the videos.
I'd go with the Tammy. The Sony GM gets very heavy after a while and the back focusing annoys me especially during an important event like a wedding. You also save a ton of money which is crucial during these times.
Great video. I have an RIV and my longest lens is the Sigma 100-400 FE mount. I also have the Sony 135GM, Sony 90mm macro, Sony 55mm ZA, Sony 24-105 and 16-35GM. I intend doing some travel in Alaska and wanted a longer than 400mm reach, for wildlife shots, and am thinking of getting the 200-600 Sony, which then puts into question the 100-400 Sigma, so was thinking a better fit might be the 70-180 Tamron and either hanging onto the 135, or maybe selling it if the Tamron is going to do a similar job, albeit zoon/vs prime, 2.8/vs 1.8. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this.
what about the tamron vs the sony 70-200 f4? is 20mm worth it? and the stabilizer?
Hey, have you checked the ‘first 2.8 lenses’ that Nikon Z has put out? How does the 24 70 S compare with your Sonys?
Hi ... thank you for that great Video ... I'm more into Aviation Photography, Sport Photography , Bird Photography and Astrophotography / Low Light Architecture Photography mainly , and from time to time a bit of Real Estate and Widlife Photography so saying that which of those 2 Lenses would you recommend for my Sony A9 and A7S ? Please
A good review, thanks. I don't think you should have spent more than 30 secs on the difference between 180 and 200mm. I'm shocked you didn't then compare 180 with 180mm so you can really compare lenses? Why no 70mm examples, bizarre?
Hello Jared, the most difficult situation for this type of lens is indoor sport photography ( as you know) so why instead of expectations don't you try this two lenses on field ? I noticed you take action pictures with lens stab "on" are you sure it is the way to go ?
Pre ordered my 70-180 from Allen’s camera the day it became available. My first purchase from Allen’s, hopefully they get it to me soon after it’s released 🤞🏼
I mean with the riv has the crop so you will get the extra reach
To add, GM has image stabilization and a hefty tripod collar/foot. Not debating whether it is worth the extra cost but that first point, the Image Stab., is definitely important.
Don't forget the customizable buttons
Another valid comparison regarding price and weight might be a comparison between the Tamron 70-180mm and the Sony 70-200mm f/4 G OSS... I have opted to keep my copy of the Sony because: 1. I already have it and it would cost me an extra couple hundred bucks to make the switch and 2. the Canon lens has OSS which is nice with a long focal length lens. A one stop gain would not be worth the switch for me. However, if Tamron had brought out a teleconverter for the 70-180mm, I would make the switch.
Note: I have not noticed any corner softness problems with the Canon f/4 G OSS lens...
I wish that Sony would come out with a 300mm f/4.0 lens to equal the Canon 300mm f/4L IS in price, weight and quality...
Really liked the video. One this I keep reading is that the GM would be better for video. It would be an interesting test to see the difference
GIVEAWAY RESULTS WHEN TO BE ANNOUNCED PLEASE MAKE DEDICATED VIDEO ON IT ?
@Igor Centner llease give the link to this post
@Igor Centner is it on his page or o profile please give a link
@Igor Centner bro please reply ....i cannot find any post related to the winner ... please give a link or something...(AND PLEASE DONT JOKE )
@Igor Centner bro ??? Are you indian ??? Please give the link ?? This is all out of overexcitement
@Igor Centner Bro please reply to my questions and please just dont joke ...provide a lknk where you saw my name
I got my tamron 70-180 to pair with the A7R4 this weekend, I can't wait to use it on wedding shoot coming soon.
Hows the lens after a year of use?
@@iceboxbob it’s been amazing ! I’ve done so many weddings with it , it’s a beautiful lens.
@@ThanhNguyen-sk6uc thanks for replying! Would you mind sharing any of your work Or if you have an instagram where you post?
I'm very tempted, but as soon as I go for it, Sigma will release their new wonder.... also could I just sacrifice speed and go with the 70-200 F4 Sony.. curious on image quality
Jared, can you do a list of lenses you recommend for socially distanced shots? :)
You are getting better as time goes by... Just like good wine
Thank you sir. Im so happy I found this channel
I 100% agree that if you're starting out, it's an excellent choice. For those that want "more", you should already know what you want. I still think it's an awesome deal that you can get ALL 3 of the Tamrons for the price of ONE Sony lens. If you're creating an image, the Tamron lenses are perfectly fine. If you wanna clout, the Sony lens is the way to go lol
I would get the sony if i had the money. The tamron with the external zoom action is just asking for dust and water to get in and ruin the lens.
"I'd rather have longer than wider"... that's what she said.
photo only I think the tamron is a better deal but if you shoot video also the GM is much better because it's parfocal and it has really good stabilization.
I was very wary when I got the Tamron 28-75, I needn't have worried, great lens (and not just for the price, in it's own right). I think Tamron need commending, lots of people want quality glass and output but don't feel comfortable splashing out on the GM lenses. In all honesty there's hardly any difference in the overall images. Like you Jared, I do think Tamron should have gone longer at let the wider end drift to 90/100. I think a 100-200 woulda been great.
Awesome Video as always👍... Keep uploading Jared brother😀
Your dog voice is amazing