Top 8 Moments from ‘Rust’ Armorer’s Emotional Sentencing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 апр 2024
- From shocking confessions to deceitful cover-ups, Law&Crime’s newest channel, Interrogations, delivers the most intense police interviews straight from the source. Subscribe now and watch the truth be uncovered on April 23: bit.ly/4aL9jvs
A judge sentenced the armorer from Alec Baldwin’s ‘Rust’ movie set shooting to 18 months behind bars. Hannah Gutierrez Reed was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. Law&Crime’s Elizabeth Millner breaks down the top eight moments from the emotional sentencing.
#RustMovieShooting #AlecBaldwin #LawAndCrime
Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
From shocking confessions to deceitful cover-ups, Law&Crime’s newest channel, Interrogations, delivers the most intense police interviews straight from the source. Subscribe now and watch the truth be uncovered on April 23: bit.ly/4aL9jvs
"The gun is cold, Mr. Baldwin." That's all that matters in the Baldwin case. Period. It is the same thing if you take your car to a brake shop. "All set sir. Enjoy your new brakes." And you drive off and after 20 minutes on the expressway you find that your brakes don't work and you smash into cars after exiting because the mechanic forgot to secure the cap back on the brake fluid reservoir and the brake fluid drained out. You have an ABSOLUTE (not reasonable) expectation to take the instruction of professionals that the gun/car is safe to operate. Period. If you don't believe that, you'd better begin checking over all auto repairs from now on.
this is a jealousy crime. she and the dead one had something secret going on.
The lack of remorse says it all. 18 months seems like an injustice
She was on for involuntary manslaughter, not murder.
And it was the maximum sentence allowed.
@@RB01.10 so what???? It's still an injustice, regardless of what the guidleines of our broken and rigged justice system entail. Why are you defending criminally negligent people???
Zero remorse. She’s more worried about her own life. Shouldn’t have had that job.
🎯
You are so ignorant!
18 months max is a slap in the face to the family.
Absolutely. A few minutes is about all that is, in comparison there’s the death of her victim. It’s ridiculous.
The judge wasn't allowed to give her more prison time. New Mexico involuntary manslaughter sentencing guidelines is 18 months, maximum. The judge gave Hannah the max time.
Not really
It’s not like miss Gutierrez set out to smoke miss hutcheons…. Chill out…😒
It was max sentence by law in NM for the offense, do no slap in face!
At the end of the day, there’s no happy ending. No matter what justice is done, it doesn’t bring Halyna back.
Justice…. I didn’t see any of that.
You're past all that by the time you're in court
@@Bradley.maloo0133 My point exactly
Lucky for her she was in NM. 18 months is pretty light.
For real. Getting a year and a half for being responsible for someone's death does not seem fair. She deserves more time, especially since she still believes that it wasn't her fault.
@@tomnelson341She seems to be a sociopath.
@@tomnelson341She was on for involuntary manslaughter which doesn’t carry the same harsh penalties as murder.
MJ’s doctor for example got the same conviction and sentence as well
Regardless of who hired her, the point is this trial is regarding her responsibility and hold her accountable for what happened and she clearly cared more about her poor future rather than the woman whose life she took because of her carelessness, she honestly deserves more time. And the actual audacity to request to get parole after she did is actually gross
Nobody would disagree with you!
She doesnt have remorse, theres footage after it happened all she kept saying is that her career is over & theres prison phone convo that she was still saying her career is over....a person was shot and k*****.
Yup, she had no clue the judge was personally listening to those calls. Her behavior on those calls and zero remorse sealed her fate.
Sounds like she wasn't qualified for the job. Who is responsible for hiring her?
Correct me if I’m wrong but she basically got the job because her dad was in the gun prop business so she learned from him and rode his curtails through Hollywood. I still don’t know who hired her but I know how she got the job 😂
Alec Baldwin was the film's producer.
That’s not how it works
She still deserves prison time and conviction….not loading a live round into a prop gun should’ve been the barest of minimums….
Definitely think more production should’ve faced charges but to my knowledge they all plead on modified charges. Hannah had that option too but she was too proud to take it, thinking she did absolutely nothing wrong
@@hyacinthmoon6289 nepotism at its finest
Her attitude about this all is what is the MOST insulting to the family! & That's NOT a lot of time at all! Especially not when u factor in that a LIFE was ENDED forever! So freaking sad!
you know why we don't hear about cases like this more often?
because they don't happen - she literally had ONE job
Like how many thousands of rounds have been shot on sets of Walking Dead no ones died from gun shot wounds
@joecable39nc exactly. All those war movies and everyone is fine because the armorers never brought live ammo on set. They followed the law.
Didn't this happen on one other movie set? The movie The Crow?? Or am I wrong?
Actually she had 2, armorer and prop assistant.
@@kaseys2004 Brandon Lee ~ Bruce Lee’s son
Should've taken the plea deal. I do wonder if she got bad legal advice or she just ignored her lawyers.
Do you know what the plea deal was? I’m curious to know what it was compared to what her sentence is.
She is an entitled brat and wanted no deal.
They are BS charges that should have never been laid against her in the first place! Seems to be a common trend in America today!
@@stanleygoering4856 She had one job: Make sure the guns on set were safe: i.e. NOT loaded with real bullets.
@@daveclark8337 it was an accident at at the hands of a faulty mechanism! Plain and simple!
18 Months??? DISGUSTINGLY LOW😢😢😢😢😢
Unfortunately it was the maximum possible given what she was ultimately charged with and found guilty of.
@@marcwilliams9824Correct.
It was also for involuntary manslaughter which doesn’t carry the same penalties as murder.
Hannah wants to deflect blame off herself by mentioning how others were also at fault, but that's flawed logic for two reasons: #1, this is *HER* trial, not theirs, this is about her negligence in this case and #2. If we're going to compare levels of responsibility, she is most responsible out of everyone involved, because it was solely her responsibility to load and check the gun to make sure it was safe, and she failed both of those tasks, other crew members were counting on her word and judgment about the gun being safe, not saying they aren't responsible in their own ways too, but she's the most responsible, from how I see it.
No disagreeing with that! Most responsible yes! She setup Dave by hiding the barrel from him and setup Alex too! Gross negligence has consequences! Espec causing death! When will she ever get it? Her awful father and his foul wrong statement is just as bad!
The sentencing, the victims impact statements were too long. The large woman made it all about her and her achievements. Me, me, me.
The judge was on point. Hannah’s actions took a life. Did you hear or read the phone call Hannah made from jail? She blamed the entire system instead of herself. She is more concerned about modeling (for onkyfans) than fact her actions caused someone to loose her life. She will be out in 9 months.
Its all about biggins its her world we are just living in it
The judges face should have its own court hearing on that horrific plastic surgery.
Hannah's lawyer is so hateable
How many of us would have so many loving friends and champions calling for justice in the event of our own wrongful deaths? That's a powerful reflection of Halyna's character. Seems like she really had an impact on those who knew her.
Well justice was served if the maximum penalty was 18 months.
I was surprised the judge listened to her phone calls, she didn't expect that I believe. they proved she still doesn't take ANY accountability ... 🤦🏼♀️
I do not understand, how is it possible at all, that the real pistol cartridges have been there! For filming isn't it enough to have blank cartridges ??!
There isn’t supposed to have live rounds at all. I can’t imagine if she wasn’t the one who brought them on set that she wouldn’t have tried to implicate who did and not go down alone and for as long. It’s mind boggling.
@@amhf1013
The man who brought the live rounds to the set tesified he was the one who brought them. He brought them from the movie 1883.
Why do people keep asking this obvious question, that's the whole point of the trial ...
At multiple points during the trial, it was stated that the armorer was allowing the guns to be used for target practice, hence the live ammunition. These were real firearms capable of firing real ammunition. It falls entirely on the armorer, who failed to ensure that when the hammer drops, the only thing that leaves the barrel is flash and powder.
1. Why were live rounds introduced on a film set?
2. Why was a firearm capable of discharging live rounds used as a prop?
3. Why was a blank firer not used as a prop?
4. If blank firers were used and one simply contained a live round; why have no concerns been raised surrounding the danger of a live round in a realistic imitation firearm - where the structural composition is not reinforced, or designed to, withstand the energy displaced from a live round; exposing the user to the possibility of a catastrophic failure upon discharge?
**EDIT**
_I haven’t myself followed this case. My questions are more rhetorical; a matter of principle, and making point of the negligent indifference concerning firearm safety that was clearly present on set. I would like to assume that such matters were addressed during the trial._
Baldwin insisted on a real gun. Hannah mistakenly brought the live round to set and also loaded it. Real guns are used on set all the time. Hence the firearm safety training actors and crew must take.
All these questions were addressed ad nauseum during her trial.
The convicted felon will no longer be able to possess any weapons.
@@Kay__Tee Interesting, thanks for that. It certainly appears that she was negligent given her responsibilities on set. Equally, if the production included the use of real firearms (even in the absence of live rounds), they should have been treated as such by ALL on set. Correct procedure even with realistic imitation firearms should be no different.
It’s evident that a certain culture had been established on set which inadvertently contributed to a relaxed approach to health and safety and procedural standards. Responsibility falls not only on her, but on the entire senior production team and management on set; those in managerial roles enabled this toxic culture of indifference to develop and be tolerated.
It’s a tragedy that it must take an accident like this to occur before matters pertaining to health and safety are taken seriously.
People not doing their jobs properly - at all levels. This woman has become the public scapegoat when in truth, there was a much wider problem of negligent indifference; a cultural issue that should never have been allowed to go on.
@@mannybravo237 I appreciate that. I haven’t myself followed this case. My questions are more rhetorical; a matter of principle, and making point of the negligent indifference concerning firearm safety that was clearly present on set.
@@23ESChambers btw if I remember correctly there were 8 or 9 guns on set. Pistols and long guns.
Don't get me wrong i think she deserves more time especially because she didn't even care in the police footage after it happened, but labeling her as a serious violent offender? That doesn't sit right with me because it just isn't true. Incredibly cold, callous, narcissistic sure but as far as we know not violent. Just so self-centered it's a legitimate hazard to people around her.
I mean, this is the second time she's let something like this happen.
@@tonyplaysthemambo My point still stands. Dangerous through sheer incompetence, maybe narcissism. But not a serious violent offender.
Anyone who has this extreme level of narcissism and lack of empathy is a serious danger to society.
Most people like her do not so clearly demonstrate to the world the repercussions of these personality disorders. She'll be a danger to society forever. Given her lack of remorse and defiance, given the same situation on a movie set, she'd do the same thing. There is no successful treatment for a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
@@janemba42 lol....your first day in court?
Bunch of lawyers in the comments lol
I bet Alec Baldwin had to change his Depends underpants when he heard that Hannah got 18 months.
You're next Alec. I hope he gets the same judge at his upcoming trial.
I'm stocking up on popcorn. His trial is going to be fun to watch.
No as he got setup and will be going home! It’s like judge said! Hannah was totally responsibility!
It used to be Depends with an S. Now it's just DEPEND. So he would need to change his depend underpants. Mandela Effect
@@Juke582 Baldwin still pointed what he knew was a functioning firearm at another person and pulled the trigger. That breaks both the universal rules of safe firearm handling, and the film industries rules for safe firearm handling.
@@Juke582You're obviously not a gun owner.
She did not take full responsibility for her crime, instead of referring it as a 'terrible tragedy'.
Way too immature for any job.
Oh, now Guterriez is sad. What a poor excuse for a human being.
Inability to take responsibility for her part in this really does reflect a lack of personal integrity.
The judge is right, she is responsible, however the chain of responsibility goes all the way up to the top and that includes the man who pulled the trigger and has no ability to accept responsibility for what he did. A Western movie should have had a professional, experienced armorer, not a prop assistant with a father who has been a gun coach and armorer for 40 years. The production management should have ensured there was adequate safety and training and not worry about a custom made gun belt for Alec Baldwin. The prop supplier and prop master should have been fully investigated as well.
we all knew this shouldn’t have been a a live round
She needed to get at least 5 years.
Her modelling career is put on hold too ;-)
Model...!? How? Who told her she could be a model. I'm assuming he's really thirsty because at best she's a low four in looks and a -4 in personality that's after she has her makeup done correctly.
As if
She doesn’t show any type of emotion until she mentions the damn film industry.
This is what a DEI hiring policy gets you.
This wasn't DEI this was 100% nepotism.
Damn dude get a new tune, it's been widely reported that she got the job through nepotism as her father is a very well-known armorer. Yet you reach into your lunchbox for the same old sandwich. HAVE AN AUTHENTIC ORIGINAL THOUGHT.
Exactly
That job has to be taken serious
what did alec baldwin get? hes the one who coulda checked too
18 month only...Should've been 15 years minimum
She got the maximum.
The judge looks like one of the fishpeople from Lovecraft's stories.
They were all a bunch of friends hiring each other keeping others who want to work out. No sympathy for no one in this case
"The gun is cold, Mr. Baldwin." That's all that matters in the Baldwin case. Period. It is the same thing if you take your car to a brake shop. "All set sir. Enjoy your new brakes." And you drive off and after 20 minutes on the expressway you find that your brakes don't work and you smash into cars after exiting because the mechanic forgot to secure the cap back on the brake fluid reservoir and the brake fluid drained out. You have an ABSOLUTE (not reasonable) expectation to take the instruction of professionals that the gun/car is safe to operate. Period. If you don't believe that, you'd better begin checking over all auto repairs from now on.
Sure, if Baldwin were just an actor, the driver of your hypothetical car. But in that example, he was also the owner of the mechanic shop.
@@reallyhappenings5597 Ah, yes! He is liable as the producer and if he hired the dip-$hit girl to run Armorer+Propmaster. Then he is liable to lawsuit. But "MURDER?" Please.
SHE DESERVES WAY LONGER IN PRISON!
This is sad all around, someone dead by accident/accidental negligence. And her life is ruined n now she has to go to jail. A real tragedy all around.
Her stupidity killed someone. She deserves punishment. Period. She took a mother, a daughter, a wife, out of the lives of her family and friends. 18 months is an insult to the victim.
I must be imagining things. A number of comments say Hannah Gutierrez Reed showed no emotion, watching this video I have seen Hannah shed tears a number of times. And saw her shed tears especially for Halyna. Has it ever occurred to anyone, maybe Hannah knows she is responsible and has accepted her fate.
Not only was it fault that the woman died, she made someone kill someone else and they must live with that for the rest of their lives. There should have never been any live ammo on set. A year for that crime is nothing at all.
The court should have made an example out of this armorer. Instead the chance was missed to protect the lives of those on movie sets in the future. Shame on you!You’ll have blood on your hands when we hear of the next live round that made it’s way down the barrel of a “safe” prop gun supposedly “secured” by the set’s armorer. Why has the justice system failed us in this matter? Hannah was arrogant and showed no sincere remorse. She is not worthy of this light sentence.
0:14: ⚖️ Armorer's negligence led to fatal shooting on movie set resulting in emotional sentencing.
4:10: 😢 Reflection on the loss of a dear friend and the impact of her absence on the speaker.
8:08: 💔 Tragic loss of life on the set of a film, impacting families and friendships deeply.
11:32: 💔 Mother of Helena Hutchins seeks justice for her daughter's death and shares the impact of the tragedy on her life.
16:40: ⚖️ Armorer's negligence in loading weapon with live rounds led to involuntary manslaughter conviction.
Tammy AI: Get video info faster & better
You a 🤖
Shouldn't that years and not month?
Maybe.. Don't talk on the jail phone!!
They need to go back to actual fake guns with those Red end caps
What they really need to do, is not to hire someone with the same resume of handling weapons as that of a kid with a cork rifle.
Yes, I commented during the trail: only hairbrushes and broom sticks🧹will be allowed on sets😉😉
And the shooter gets nothing wtf
Why??? She set him up!!!!
@@Juke582 you learn the first time you handle a firearm always clear it. Second don't point it at anything you don't want to destroy. Thirdly never rest your finger on the trigger. Don't point it at someone period. You must have never handled a firearm...
@@coletrain3333 He's on trial in July. Try paying attention.
What do you mean "get nothing"? He hasn't been tried yet.
Hannah screwed up. If you know her history she has been irresponsible in the past. However, I still think she is being treated harshly by the MAN. The MAN always has the last word. 😮😮😮. RIP Halyna Hutchins. ☠️❤☠️
Baldwin better get more than 18 months. He definitely pulled the trigger out of frustration that he was being made to redo takes.
If only you had the self awareness to realize how ignorant and incorrect that statement is.
@@larryhader5695 He’s a notorious hothead who explodes on sets and there were witnesses saying he was frustrated with her for how she was directing him that day. He didn’t think it was loaded so pulling the trigger was probably a secret little F-you to her.
@@girlbrains163 It's a negligent manslaughter. 18 months is the maximum for that in NM.
@@larryhader5695What do you mean?
@@reallyhappenings5597 I mean that that’s an ignorant lie that completely shows the lack of research on the case at hand. If she was a celebrity and Said that in an interview she would get sued for defamation
She had nikolas cruz defense lawyer
She told Alec Baldwin it was a safe prop gun? Why should he be facing charges then?
Because he was reckless and there is no such thing as a "fake prop gun"
All of them are real. If it has a barrel
a) he didn't check the gun
b) he's producer, crew members left before the shooting due to safety concerns and he had also a part in hiring her
Cuz he handled the gun recklessly. He cocked it, pointed it at a person and pulled the trigger. SAG guidelines advise actors to treat guns as if they are loaded and use proper safety. Alec didn’t.
@raketensven3127 , EXACTLY. Baldwin, as an experienced actor, was well aware of her incompetence. As producer, he had a responsibility to ensure the set was safe for cast and crew. He was negligent. His negligence is involuntary manslaughter.
First of all - as a producer he was responsible for hiring this dimwit of a "armourer" - and secondly - the protocol states that at no point you point a SAFE gun in the direction of the crew and then PULL the trigger. All the evidence suggests that that madman, your blessed famous actor, not only pointed the gun in the direction of people but also PULLED the bloody trigger. NOTE - THE protocol states you must NOT do that with the SAFE gun - protocol does not say anything about not safe guns as they should not be on the set.
What is her motive? Why did she do it?
If that’s all she gets, why bother taking, Alex to court at all 😢😢😢. Was justice on holidays.
I don't think it was involuntary, may be she had some issues with her. Who knows?
That not how court works. If there's no evidence that it was voluntary, it's involuntary.
By the way, there is no way she would have been able to predict who the gun would have been pointed at.
in the end, it doesn't even matter. She'll get out in 18 months or less and drop right into a modeling career or become a pr0n star. She's gotten through life so far on her looks, so she'll have no issues and she knows it. That's why she has no issues.
Her looks?! What?
whether baldwin wnted a real gun or not. It was HER job to make sure the bullets were blank. She mistakenly bought live rounds? really? It is all her fault.
Gee, her life wasn’t worth very much at the end of the day. 18 months….was the judge on drugs ??
The judge gave her the MAXIMUM possible sentence for involuntary manslaughter in NM. Don't you get that? Are YOU on drugs?
Meanwhile Baldwin is scotch free. He pulled the trigger!
It’s Scot free, and his trial is coming up next few weeks
@@TheMovieLoft Thank you. Some people like to be loud and wrong because they dislike someone
@@TheMovieLoftactually, it's Scott free 😏
Lock up Baldwin in NM!
she LOOKS like she'd do somethin like that lol
@thedopest
WTH? Are you still in Jr. High? What kind of adolescent remark is that? I hope you dont go through life judging everyone based on their looks. GTFOH.
Being designated as a serious violent offender seems odd to me. It's not like she's a gang member?
It is ridiculous.
This is not the first time something like this has happened on one of her sets. She had nearly killed someone else before doing something like this, so there is precedent.
It’s to ensure she has to serve at least 85% of her sentence.
@Kay__Tee completely dishonest on the part of the judge. She let her emotions get in the way. Awful.
@@tonyplaysthemambo but that is just negligence and incompetence at her job. To be classed as a serious violent offender the person is usually a gang member or has a history of assault and/or violent murder. This is just a chick who really sucks at what she does. This is the result of DEI hiring practices and nepotism.
Alec should be charged!
He was indicted in January. Trial is in July
He should NOT be charged!
@@pjhey947 oh he should absolutely be charged
Why? Just curious
@@Kay__Tee Why is that?
Cokehead, stoners shouldn’t have access to guns.
That's nothing
Hannah wanting to be a model….
✋🤚 model… with cuffs… duh.
Hannah: I don’t give a sh*t, I don’t give a sh*t,
I did nothing wrong, I only care about myself!
🙄 x100
It was such a tragic accident
Accident is not the right word. Gross negligence leading to someone's death is the only way to describe this situation.
If it was an accident, she wouldn't have been found guilty. It was negligence. They already testified that crew members were shooting targets on set, while the film was still in production.
Maybe not an accident! I swear Hannah did it on purpose! She hid the barrel from David and took the gun to Alex to set him up!!! She is a monster! 👺
Alec got his patsy
Uh no, they’re both guilty. Have some common sense.
They will both be sentenced. They’re both already found to be guilty.
Oh poor little Hannah. Im so sorry they sent you away for a year. You were manipulated and given TWO jobs which led to responsibilities that you could not handle.
Its really sad that the director and Alec Baldwin walked all over Hanna and killed her confidence in her duties.
If alec doesnt get a year i will be extremely upset. Him and the director are JUST as guilty as Hannah in regards to not following safety procedures.
Oh please! Stop supporting this narcissist! She loaded that gun real on purpose!
@@Juke582 did she though? Was that proven? Did she intentionally bring live ammo on set? Definitely not on the latter.
@@MrHurricaneFloyd you know nothing about the case or English it appears. I had to read ur comment twice to understand.
Hannah was no where near Alec or the "producer" at the time the fire was shot. She was off doing her SECOND job they assigned her. Go learn the case then come back.
She should get an additional 18 months....on a treadmill.
Actually, we still don't know how the live round got into the gun do we. So, she says she doesn't know. I think there are a lot of factors causing this. She didn't introduce the live rounds. I think we know who introduced the live rounds.
Hannah brought the live rounds on set herself. She took photos on her phone of the ammo trays when production started. The live rounds are visible in the photos. The reason they got on set is because she stupidly did not follow any safety checks whatsoever in her past handling of the rounds.
At the end of the day it was an accident and people need to remember that. She didn't kill anyone, she failed to do a job properly. She's not some evil killer, just a human being who made a mistake.
The diversity hire stuffed up. How unusual.
This was a 100% nepotism hire.
Her only crime was not being as wealthy and well connected as Alec Baldwin.
How come David made a great deal then?? He is not rich!
He’s going on trial on July.
@@angelarose9575 no he's not. All charges against him were dropped last year.
@@moroaica3660 You really haven't been paying attention to this case over the last six months have you.
DEI has its virtues.....
100% a nepotism hire.
1st
They are using her as a scape goat to let da Baldwin off the hook.
lol you’re really nuts 🤣 like mentally crazy.
This prosecutor is going to want to win BOTH cases.
Shouldn't Alec get 1st degree murder charges? he shot the gun directly at the girl.
1st degree requires intent and/or malice. He was only reckless.
@@Kay__Tee ye but the gun didn't need to be pointed directly at the girl for the movie, i hope this movie is cancelled all together.
@@badrrharri that does equate to intent to kill or malice. It’s just recklessness
@@badrrharri in addition, you would have to prove he knew there was a live round in the gun at the time. That would be difficult to prove
@@badrrharrithey've already finished the movie. And if he's convicted, he won't get any more time than she did. Same charges
Democrat @ 3:57
And?
I don't think this is a political issue. I think it's a safety regulation issue.
Only Repugnant would inject politics into this tragedy.
She's to pretty for jail
she's beautiful.
She cleans up nice
Alec Baldwin walks completely free
It was an accident! She. Didn’t mean to make the mistake. It’s tragic, but it was a terrible ACCIDENT! ALEC BALDWIN PULLED THE TRIGGER AND THAT WASNT EVEN IN THE SCRIPT. This was just wrong.
lol. An unloaded gun is not dangerous 🤣🤣 if she loaded the gun. With live rounds. It is not dangerous.
Not an accident! It’s her job. She shouldn’t have that job period. She loaded the gun. She’s in trouble now
This was no accident. She showed a pattern of disregard for safety. She was repeatedly careless and reckless. Her irresponsible actions put everyone at risk. She knew the job was to be the one responsible for safety
It was negligence. If you drive drunk and kill a child is that an accident?