Dear, sir, good comparison however for a fair result both cameras need to have exactly the very SAME LENS to bring true justice in pixel peeping thorough examination. A big THANK you for your good YT YT-video! Please keep up your good work! Stay blessed every new day! Best regards from Sweden!
It isn’t a shutter shock issue. The image with the mountain in the background was taken at 1/60s, and the one of the woods at 1/50s. Not exactly the same shutter speed, but close enough. Shutter shock is shutter speed dependent and not lighting dependent. From what OP has shown my guess is simply light. He needs to try and put on a lens hood on there. For a simple test, just roll a black sheet of paper and tape it on the lens as a cheap lens hood. See if that fixes the washed out hazy look. Alternatively in doors different locations of the light (entering the lens) would also help to test and see if this is the problem or not.
I love the Capetown area👍. Thanks for the review. The problem with the Canon m series is, that Canon does not have good enough m mount lenses to resolved the 32mp sensor.🤨
IMO Fuji has much more mature lens lineup than EF-M. Of course we can adapt DLSR lenses to Canon but the whole idea behind EF-M cameras for me is its small size. You don’t buy small camera to adapt big lenses
@@todanrg3 I was using original EOS M for two years as a travel camera with EF M 18-55 and EF M 55-200. In 2019 I upgraded to xt20 mainly because I hated winter photography with Eos M (lack of dials) and wanted better AF. I have to say that xt20 AF is not very fast but I was very surprised by the difference in image quality - images from xt20 with xf18-55 and xc50-230 were much more detailed than from Eos M, I didn't expect such a difference. xc50-230 is a very lightweight lens and for me is an EF m 55-200 equivalent. Canon system does not have dedicated longer lenses. Fuji has xf55-200, xf70-300, xf200, xf100-400 - the last two being professional big lenses for sport and wildlife. Of course you can adapt DLSR lenses to M bodies but they were designed for DLSRs. And if you adapt lens everything becomes longer because of adapter. I own XF70-300 and it fits into my winter jacket pocket, two weeks ago I spent 4 days hiking in the mountains with xf70-300 in one pocket, samyang 12 mm in the other and xt20 with xf18-55 on the strap
Excellent observations!I have a canon m50 and have lenses 15-45mm,22mm,50mm 1.8 and 18-200mm.The 15-45mm lens is really weak and is more suitable for shooting video, the detail on it is lame.Among these lenses, the best is 22 mm for the eos-m system, it is very sharp, has a wide aperture of 2.0, suitable for landscape and not very close plans.I had an xt-30 camera for two days of use with a kit lens and sometimes it amazed me with the detail of small objects on close-up plans, but I didn't like the Fuji color, and I sold it without sorting it out.Based on your video and my experience of owning a Canon m50, I can to say that Canon has a problem with the background light, and in this case the picture loses detail.Maybe I'm wrong, I'll wait for your tests with other lenses!
Looks like you have picked up the Shutter Shock issue with the M6ii on IS lenses. You find find it at 15mm but from 30 to 45 you see it. Turning off IS should sharpen the Canon which defeats its purpose. The Canon has the best colours. but does not shine on this zoom lense or any other for that fact with a plastic body. The adaptor is buffering the shock form the shutter. Shoot the same test with the Canon with silent shutter/E-shutter. You will see a difference. Great channel by they way and looking forward to see it grow. Man i miss Cape Town.
Dear, sir, good comparison however for a fair result both cameras need to have exactly the very SAME LENS to bring true justice in pixel peeping thorough examination. A big THANK you for your good YT YT-video! Please keep up your good work! Stay blessed every new day!
Best regards from Sweden!
It isn’t a shutter shock issue. The image with the mountain in the background was taken at 1/60s, and the one of the woods at 1/50s. Not exactly the same shutter speed, but close enough. Shutter shock is shutter speed dependent and not lighting dependent. From what OP has shown my guess is simply light. He needs to try and put on a lens hood on there. For a simple test, just roll a black sheet of paper and tape it on the lens as a cheap lens hood. See if that fixes the washed out hazy look.
Alternatively in doors different locations of the light (entering the lens) would also help to test and see if this is the problem or not.
it is not the camera you are reviewing, it is the lens.
Not when it comes to dynamic range
I love the Capetown area👍. Thanks for the review. The problem with the Canon m series is, that Canon does not have good enough m mount lenses to resolved the 32mp sensor.🤨
Thanks for this comparison, very useful.
IMO Fuji has much more mature lens lineup than EF-M. Of course we can adapt DLSR lenses to Canon but the whole idea behind EF-M cameras for me is its small size. You don’t buy small camera to adapt big lenses
So tell me, how much bigger is a Canon EF 70-300 or 70-200 F4 versus a Fuji 70-300. Not a huge difference in size...
@@todanrg3 I was using original EOS M for two years as a travel camera with EF M 18-55 and EF M 55-200. In 2019 I upgraded to xt20 mainly because I hated winter photography with Eos M (lack of dials) and wanted better AF. I have to say that xt20 AF is not very fast but I was very surprised by the difference in image quality - images from xt20 with xf18-55 and xc50-230 were much more detailed than from Eos M, I didn't expect such a difference. xc50-230 is a very lightweight lens and for me is an EF m 55-200 equivalent. Canon system does not have dedicated longer lenses. Fuji has xf55-200, xf70-300, xf200, xf100-400 - the last two being professional big lenses for sport and wildlife. Of course you can adapt DLSR lenses to M bodies but they were designed for DLSRs. And if you adapt lens everything becomes longer because of adapter. I own XF70-300 and it fits into my winter jacket pocket, two weeks ago I spent 4 days hiking in the mountains with xf70-300 in one pocket, samyang 12 mm in the other and xt20 with xf18-55 on the strap
Excellent observations!I have a canon m50 and have lenses 15-45mm,22mm,50mm 1.8 and 18-200mm.The 15-45mm lens is really weak and is more suitable for shooting video, the detail on it is lame.Among these lenses, the best is 22 mm for the eos-m system, it is very sharp, has a wide aperture of 2.0, suitable for landscape and not very close plans.I had an xt-30 camera for two days of use with a kit lens and sometimes it amazed me with the detail of small objects on close-up plans, but I didn't like the Fuji color, and I sold it without sorting it out.Based on your video and my experience of owning a Canon m50, I can to say that Canon has a problem with the background light, and in this case the picture loses detail.Maybe I'm wrong, I'll wait for your tests with other lenses!
Thanks for your feedback, Really appreciate it. Follow up video coming soon.
@Hjjknng Exggjlnnjj ,The best recipe is raw processing in Capture one, in which case I get a lot more color details that are missing in jpeg.
maybe the longer barrel of the converter reflected light so it lost contrast.
the same thing happened when shooting without lens hood
The problem with the canon kit, is that the kit lens really isn't sharp enough for the 33mpx. I got some better lenses and it's night and day.
Looks like you have picked up the Shutter Shock issue with the M6ii on IS lenses. You find find it at 15mm but from 30 to 45 you see it. Turning off IS should sharpen the Canon which defeats its purpose. The Canon has the best colours. but does not shine on this zoom lense or any other for that fact with a plastic body. The adaptor is buffering the shock form the shutter. Shoot the same test with the Canon with silent shutter/E-shutter. You will see a difference. Great channel by they way and looking forward to see it grow. Man i miss Cape Town.
Nice comparison...
Are you using raw pictures on both? Because there's a known problem of fujifilm and some raw softwares, like lightroom
Yes. Images are shot in RAW and processed in Capture One Pro.
F11 in brigh environments seems like the canon lense have more refraction effect
The sigma 56mm eos-m is great with the Canon
Yes, the Canon performs much better with other lenses
but kit lens 15-45 efm so bad quality than fuji lenses. upgrade kit canon for more better image
Very informative video and nice revealing comparison. Saved me from buying Canon m6 ii
Great to hear!
Fuji camera don’t have native ISO100
The lowest ISO is 160
Maybe you do it wrong
You can go to the settings on the Fuji X-T30 and expand/boost the ISO from 80 to 51200 allowing you to shoot on 100 ISO.
wow i thought fuji will win in landscape
canon = dont use above F4, F4 is sharpest. i checke lots of Videos.
Fuji tha name is enough
Fujifilm way better.