There's an older form of Lithuanian called 'Old Lithuanian', but it's not much different from the modern standard form in terms of pronounciation and grammar. Perhaps, Proto-Balto-Slavic or Proto-Baltic would be much more interesting of a comparison!
Its pretty sad that through history Lithuanian had only loses,like Assimilation of Prussians by Germans,language change of aristocrats and finally Russification in Ussr.
Al menos el crearse un imperio en la edad media los hizo sobrevivir aunque tengan la una cantidad de personas similar a los aymara (un pueblo amerindio de 2.5 - 3 millones )
@matthewsiregar Indeed,plus they are the most archaic(The closest ones to Proto-Indoeuropean),so by understanding Baltic languages we could sort of understand how spoke and thought our ancestors.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē´pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu. Sanskrit Saolaítear na daoine uile saor agus comhionann ina ndínit agus ina gcearta. Tá bua an réasúin agus an choinsiasa acu agus dlíd iad féin d'iompar de mheon bráithreachais i leith a chéile. Irish gaelic
Instead of the prayer, you should've put a collection of core vocabulary words and simple phrases together, that would've illustrated the extreme degree of similarity between the two better.
Pretty sounds. Latvian and Latgalian has words more similar to vedic for example: Debesiis is word similar to Dieva, Deus, which probably in latin and slavic transformed to neb(ula)(latin), nebesiis(slavic) mean clouds, Sky. This transformation is the opposite of the transformation of "n" to "d" in the numeral "nine" between Indo-European and Slavic, or precisely Latvian. It results from the phonetic proximity between n and d, between which there is only a change of the objects of contraction from the lips to the tongue and teeth. Both are articulated in front. Many people claim that the Lithuanian language is the most archaic, which some mistakenly associate with similarity to Sanskrit, as if it were somehow ennobling. This is a false assumption, because archaicity in no way indicates the betterment of the language. The Lithuanian language, or Latvian, is beautiful regardless of its alleged archaicity. And archaicity is not the same as similarity to Vedic, because some languages, whether Germanic, Latin, Slavic, Celtic, or any other, have certain features more archaic than the Vedas or Avesta. I say "allegedly" because in some respects the Baltic language is archaic, in other respects Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, etc. The Polish forms "gwizdać" - whistle "gwiazda" - star are different than in the rest of Slavic and have avoided palatalization, and in Sanskrit (shishkar - whistle), or in Latvian (svilpe- whistle zvaigzne-star) we already have a form with palatalization (Lithuanian "žvaigždė švilpukas"). In this respect, Polish turns out to be more archaic than Baltic or Indo-Iranian. But, for example, in the case of the word for "King" or "to carry", it is not. The vision of the existence of Balto-Slavic as an intermediate stage is, in my opinion, doubtful. it is worth considering the disintegration of *PIE into many different dialects, into many more than it has survived, some of which only have a history like a tree, while others died out, entered leagues, already at the stage of mutually understandable dialects. Isoglosses such as satemism or kentumism, based on palatalizations probably existed earlier as alternations, sometimes appearing, sometimes disappearing, which is illustrated by the difference in this aspect between the numeral four in Latvian and Lithuanian. Latvian has a form of the first sound here similar to Slavic or Indo-Iranian languages, while the rest of the arrangement is more archaic than Slavic, and it is difficult to assume that only this first sound was borrowed from Slavic, and not the entire word order. This borrowing would have to have occurred in the Proto-Slavic era. Lithuanian, on the other hand, has a form "4" that is more archaic than Indo-Aryan, because it is free from palatalization of the first sound.
It's not about it. The video doesn't show it, but there is an incredible number of lexical and morphological similarities between Lithuanian and Vedic Sanskrit. Lithuanian is incredibly archaic for a modern Indo European language, and this connection shows it the best.
The literal meaning of the Lithuanian word "dangus" is "that which covers", this word comes from the Lithuanian verb "deng-ti" (to cover). In addition, "dangus" has other meanings.
Fascinating. Really proves the Indo European connection.
Could we do some older form of Lithuanian AND Vedic Sanskrit ?
There's an older form of Lithuanian called 'Old Lithuanian', but it's not much different from the modern standard form in terms of pronounciation and grammar. Perhaps, Proto-Balto-Slavic or Proto-Baltic would be much more interesting of a comparison!
Please Lithuanian vs Proto Indoeuropean please 🙏🏻
Great video duo thanks for sharing.
Lithuanian and Ancient Greek please!
True! Protest for Ancient Greek with Lithuanian!!!
Just go to northern Greece and compare 5h3 local Slavic to the official Greek, you’ll find so many similarities 😊
Its pretty sad that through history Lithuanian had only loses,like Assimilation of Prussians by Germans,language change of aristocrats and finally Russification in Ussr.
Al menos el crearse un imperio en la edad media los hizo sobrevivir aunque tengan la una cantidad de personas similar a los aymara (un pueblo amerindio de 2.5 - 3 millones )
@@CabradeMontaña69 I don't know Spanish...
the baltic branch is seriously underrated ngl, they sound beautiful and unique
@matthewsiregar Indeed,plus they are the most archaic(The closest ones to Proto-Indoeuropean),so by understanding Baltic languages we could sort of understand how spoke and thought our ancestors.
You know the other sad part? The population is decreasing
Did anyone else see that it’s entirely different when you go beyond counting?
Yes. There are bunch of same-root/similar words, but the same words are available in Russian or Polish etc.
Excuse me, does the Lithuanian Alphabet use à? 😂
@@Motogpboy-n2o Used in accentuation, like à, ã, ñ, etc.
Sarvē mānavāḥ svatantrāḥ samutpannāḥ vartantē api ca, gauravadr̥śā adhikāradr̥śā ca samānāḥ ēva vartantē. Ētē sarvē cētanā-tarka-śaktibhyāṁ susampannāḥ santi. Api ca, sarvē´pi bandhutva-bhāvanayā parasparaṁ vyavaharantu. Sanskrit
Saolaítear na daoine uile saor agus comhionann ina ndínit agus ina gcearta. Tá bua an réasúin agus an choinsiasa acu agus dlíd iad féin d'iompar de mheon bráithreachais i leith a chéile. Irish gaelic
Wicked
Drochscéalta Irish gaelic
Drwg Welsh
Dusht Hindi
Duṣṭa Gujarati
@@Hyperion-5744cognate with druj in Avestan ?
नाइस❤❤❤
You could have chosen a different text or word list to show the similarities.
❤❤❤Nice comparison but Venetic, would there be a similarity?
Vedic Sanskrit vs Proto-Dravidian, please 🙏
I wonder how a Rig Vedic recitation but in Lithuanian next to Vedic Sanskrit look like
Instead of the prayer, you should've put a collection of core vocabulary words and simple phrases together, that would've illustrated the extreme degree of similarity between the two better.
Pretty sounds. Latvian and Latgalian has words more similar to vedic for example: Debesiis is word similar to Dieva, Deus, which probably in latin and slavic transformed to neb(ula)(latin), nebesiis(slavic) mean clouds, Sky.
This transformation is the opposite of the transformation of "n" to "d" in the numeral "nine" between Indo-European and Slavic, or precisely Latvian. It results from the phonetic proximity between n and d, between which there is only a change of the objects of contraction from the lips to the tongue and teeth. Both are articulated in front.
Many people claim that the Lithuanian language is the most archaic, which some mistakenly associate with similarity to Sanskrit, as if it were somehow ennobling. This is a false assumption, because archaicity in no way indicates the betterment of the language.
The Lithuanian language, or Latvian, is beautiful regardless of its alleged archaicity.
And archaicity is not the same as similarity to Vedic, because some languages, whether Germanic, Latin, Slavic, Celtic, or any other, have certain features more archaic than the Vedas or Avesta.
I say "allegedly" because in some respects the Baltic language is archaic, in other respects Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, etc.
The Polish forms "gwizdać" - whistle "gwiazda" - star are different than in the rest of Slavic and have avoided palatalization, and in Sanskrit (shishkar - whistle), or in Latvian (svilpe- whistle zvaigzne-star)
we already have a form with palatalization (Lithuanian "žvaigždė
švilpukas"). In this respect, Polish turns out to be more archaic than Baltic or Indo-Iranian.
But, for example, in the case of the word for "King" or "to carry", it is not.
The vision of the existence of Balto-Slavic as an intermediate stage is, in my opinion, doubtful. it is worth considering the disintegration of *PIE into many different dialects, into many more than it has survived, some of which only have a history like a tree, while others died out, entered leagues, already at the stage of mutually understandable dialects. Isoglosses such as satemism or kentumism, based on palatalizations probably existed earlier as alternations, sometimes appearing, sometimes disappearing, which is illustrated by the difference in this aspect between the numeral four in Latvian and Lithuanian. Latvian has a form of the first sound here similar to Slavic or Indo-Iranian languages, while the rest of the arrangement is more archaic than Slavic, and it is difficult to assume that only this first sound was borrowed from Slavic, and not the entire word order. This borrowing would have to have occurred in the Proto-Slavic era. Lithuanian, on the other hand, has a form "4" that is more archaic than Indo-Aryan, because it is free from palatalization of the first sound.
Bariya!
The numbers are similar but that's about it. They are also similar to Romanian.
It's not about it. The video doesn't show it, but there is an incredible number of lexical and morphological similarities between Lithuanian and Vedic Sanskrit. Lithuanian is incredibly archaic for a modern Indo European language, and this connection shows it the best.
Lithuaninan name for sky is dangus. Is it connected with Turk word tengri or Chinese tien, both with similar meaning?
it appears it comes from Proto-Indoeuropean *dʰéngʰ-t, meaning 'to cover.' (as in, the sky covers everything)
The literal meaning of the Lithuanian word "dangus" is "that which covers", this word comes from the Lithuanian verb "deng-ti" (to cover). In addition, "dangus" has other meanings.
that are only coicidences
Choosing a prayer is not a good idea. In all languages it is in an archaic version
Make Vedic Sanskrit, Classical Sanskrit, Old Persian & Avestan Languages...!!!
This is like the 2md time
Lithuanian don't have letter à are you joking Andy?
Plssssss..... Make ananother separeted video of proto indo European and proto indo iranian languages plssssssss......... 😢😢😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Only a couple words are similar tho
Doesnt even sound alike, other than the numbers.
Those sentence sees no connection only number are same
I didn't know Baltic languages are connected to Indo Iranian even tho they Come from different origin or something
They have common origin, Proto Indo European.