10. The Preterist Approach to Revelation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
  • Thoughout the history of the church, there have always been those who maintained that the colorful and powerful images of Revelation refer largely to events that took place in the first century, and are related generally to the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple, and the definitive end of the Old Covenant era. While this view has not often been the majority outlook, it has persisted, and continues to offer a compelling perspective for the thoughtful reader of the Apocalypse. This lecture offers a summary of the major aspects of the view usually called 'preterist.' For more free resources, please visit www.brucegore.com

Комментарии • 955

  • @ayliniemi
    @ayliniemi 5 лет назад +130

    Im a trucker on the oilfield. I don't have a lot of time to search through books. Thanks for doing it for me and putting it on RUclips so that guys like me can listen as we drive.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +28

      Thanks for taking me along! I appreciate the lift!

    • @archangel_metatron
      @archangel_metatron 2 года назад +2

      Jesus will return after Jerusalem gets nuked by the abomination which causes desolation mentioned in Matthew 24.
      4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They[a] had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.7 When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison 8 and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth-Gog and Magog-and to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore. 9 They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God’s people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them. 10 And the devil, who deceived them, was thrown into the lake of burning sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet had been thrown. They will be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
      31“When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the [c]holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; 36I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’
      37“Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? 38When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’
      41“Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’
      44“Then they also will answer [d]Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”
      Jesus is the only created being of God. Through Jesus ALL things were made.
      5For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as there are many gods and many lords), 6yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live.
      ♾️ Infinity is closed loop because the beginning is the end and the end is the beginning. God is the singularity responsible for the big bang and according to the many laws of conservation that singularity had to be equal to or greater than all of the mass, energy, and information/intelligence in the universe, past, present, and future combined. And since things are neither created of destroyed, only transferred or transformed, this means God became the universe. God is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent. God is everything everywhere.
      Jesus must reign until he has defeated all of his enemies.
      ALL Power, Dominion, and Authority...
      Then the last enemy to be defeated is DEATH itself. Then he will return the kingdom to the Father, so that God may be ALL in ALL
      The Lord says to my lord:[a]
      “Sit at my right hand
      until I make your enemies
      a footstool for your feet.”
      24Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. 25For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. 26The last enemy that will be destroyed is death. 27For “He has put all things under His feet.” But when He says “all things are put under Him,” it is evident that He who put all things under Him is excepted. 28Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
      The Earth is HELL in the future. It gets hit by an asteroid and pushed toward the sun.
      Isaiah 13:12-13, Revelation 9, 2 Peter 3
      10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be [d]burned up. 11 Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, 12 looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 13 Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.
      The New Jerusalem will take the best of humanity and the glory of the nations to a New Earth.

    • @juenmmonterrey7767
      @juenmmonterrey7767 2 года назад

      dont believe everything you hear in yt..actually , if you had time to study, you would see NONE , ZERO of apostoles, church fathers, bishops, early christians bellieve revelations happened in 70 ad..in actuallity, they all say rev was written after 90 ad!

    • @juenmmonterrey7767
      @juenmmonterrey7767 2 года назад

      plus, just a bonus..saying jesus doesnt return in bodily form and doesnt restore creation is unchristian..meaning f preterist are not christian and actually shun down as heresy and something to mark and avoid.

    • @archangel_metatron
      @archangel_metatron 2 года назад +4

      @@juenmmonterrey7767 Anyone who believes revelation is over never read 2 Peter 3.

  • @logicaldude3611
    @logicaldude3611 2 года назад +77

    As soon as I began my studies in college and a professor pointed out that you have to read each book of the Bible with the goal of finding the author's original intent, that was so revolutionary to me. I don't know why something so simple gets overlooked by so many people (I was one of them), but as soon as you read these books in that fashion I feel that they become so much more alive. It all makes so much more sense.

    • @jamesstumpff7774
      @jamesstumpff7774 Год назад

      Read each book
      Focus on……authors intent
      Wow
      Satan never said anything more convoluted than that
      Ok so your godless prof had a technique for you
      Did you know Jesus had a very DIFFERENT technique?
      Read it like a child!
      Way before you get brain fukkkkkkkkd in kolledge
      Oh by the way
      Just in case your thinking you’ve got some academic seniority here
      My first degree is BS in Chemistry
      Guessing you went to preacher school…

    • @markschneider8103
      @markschneider8103 Год назад +4

      Amen Logical Dude

    • @carlaaarikagatus8823
      @carlaaarikagatus8823 Год назад +2

      So truueee brother

    • @roundhouserenovations3072
      @roundhouserenovations3072 Год назад +9

      I could not agree more most of the books in the New testament were letters to individuals and churches and I know that when I read somebody's letter I don't go down to the third chapter and read two sentences and then try to determine that this is what he meant when he wrote this letter to me so what you're saying has immense value and I hope many people see your comment.

    • @ShawHortonMusic
      @ShawHortonMusic 5 месяцев назад +1

      I’m currently enrolled in a seminar on the Gospel of Matthew; very much viewing it from that literary standpoint and assessing what might have been the author’s original intent. I agree with you, that method of reading the text opens it up in a brand new way.

  • @markschneider8103
    @markschneider8103 Год назад +41

    It is so refreshing to to hear Revelation taught in its proper first century context. Thank you Dr. Gore !

  • @jasondexter4530
    @jasondexter4530 Год назад +33

    There is a LOT of preterist content out there, but I'm very thankful that your timetable was truncated forcing you to fit all of Revelation into one session less than an hour long. Finding a concise teaching about the preterist view of Revelation to introduce to my children has been HARD, but this is just right! Thanks, brother!

    • @chasethecat3839
      @chasethecat3839 3 месяца назад +1

      I am like a child with this so your comment helped ME as a newer child (at 61 yrs old) to know where to start). TY. U never know when gods gonna use your comments to help others, right? ❤

    • @pauldexter7557
      @pauldexter7557 3 месяца назад

      Praise the Lord! I started with Gary DeMar's book: Last Days Madness when I was wrestling with eschatology at Bible college.@@chasethecat3839

    • @cycribbs
      @cycribbs 2 месяца назад

      The founder of preterism was a Jesuit named Luis de Alcazar. The whole intent was to avert the Protestants who believed that the pope was the Antichrist and to avert it somewhere else. Preterists believe that Nero was the Antichrist. But Jesus said there will be many antichrists or many that will come in my name saying I am the Christ. Nero never said that

    • @cycribbs
      @cycribbs 2 месяца назад

      The Jesuits also concocted the Zionist dispensational doctrines, so now you have two false belief systems at war with each other over doctrinal differences when they're both wrong.

  • @LuvBorderCollies
    @LuvBorderCollies 8 лет назад +153

    I've watched this presentation about 5 times now, trying to get my head wrapped around this way of viewing Revelation. It is so different than what I'd been told by many sources over the years.
    But I'm glad I found it. Bruce makes Revelation so understandable I highly recommend others watch it. The viewpoint he presents is so logical it's like opening the blinds and letting sunlight on a mysterious book. Thanks for this presentation, its really helped me.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +39

      +LuvBorderCollies It took me quite a while to rethink Revelation as well. On the whole, I have found this a vastly more satisfying and helpful way to view this great book of the Bible! Thanks for your kind remarks.

    • @charlescapps3339
      @charlescapps3339 6 лет назад +27

      LuvBorderCollies : I had no idea. I was saved 5 years ago. All I heard was the futurist approach. I began to read the Bible myself and found I was told a bunch of lies. I thought I was alone in what I thought. But I found people such as Bruce as well

    • @annchovey2089
      @annchovey2089 6 лет назад +32

      I always knew the futurist approach was wrong but I didn't know what to believe and living in the Midwest where people worship at the altar of Hal Lindsay and Tim LaHaye, I was worried I would never figure out the mystery of Revelation. Thank God for the internet. Everyone thought I was a heretic because I didn't believe in the rapture. So glad to see that theory losing ground. What a shame that those who hold to the futurist approach fail to see all the fantastic foreshadowing in Ezekiel, Daniel, etc. Holding the futurist approach also fails to give God the credit for fulfilling prophecy exactly as was presented to John in Revelation which lends even more credibility to the Bible. Discovered partial preterism 20 years ago and I now can enjoy reading the Bible.

    • @admiralmurat2777
      @admiralmurat2777 5 лет назад +7

      @@annchovey2089 check out brother William Bell All Things Fulfilled on RUclips.

    • @lavieenrose5954
      @lavieenrose5954 5 лет назад +16

      Ann Chovey
      Praise God for having the discernment to leave dispensationalism - , they completely forget about audience relevance and context and insert a rapture or second coming into nearly every book. To put today’s world into Hebrew symbolic, poetic, language with all its different idioms is ridiculous and it takes away from the beauty of the story......
      It’s tragic they turn Revelation, the unveiling of the beauty of Christ’s victory, into a scary vision of how they’ll be living if they get ‘left behind’.
      Good for you 🙏🏽❣️

  • @riverjao
    @riverjao 8 лет назад +78

    I'm a pastor, and preterist, myself, and I would say that was one GREAT overview of the preterist view of The Apocalypse!!!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +9

      +Jordan Orick Thank you my friend!

    • @riverjao
      @riverjao 6 лет назад +3

      I'm in Michigan. Sorry, somehow I didn't see this comment until now :(

    • @samanthareed5803
      @samanthareed5803 6 лет назад +2

      Will you please direct me to someone very knowledgeable in revelation, perhaps a minister/pastor I can talk to about end times matters? I really need help with it!

    • @riverjao
      @riverjao 6 лет назад +2

      samantha reed Hi Samantha. Would you be interested in some good books or resources to help you out?

    • @samanthareed5803
      @samanthareed5803 6 лет назад +3

      @@riverjao Ok that would be good. Especially about the beast/mark of the beast and the AntiChrist.

  • @mvt28
    @mvt28 8 лет назад +101

    A knowledge of history and not being afraid to welcome different ideas, with a sincerity to know the word of God, leads to a proper understanding of this book. Great job. Thank you.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +4

      +An Ngo Thank you!

    • @marcellusquickley2633
      @marcellusquickley2633 6 лет назад +2

      Praise King Jesus awesome teaching on the subjected 70ad is the final end of Old Covenant Israel. Elder Marcellus Quickley 4105887664

    • @Scribeintheink
      @Scribeintheink Год назад +2

      Sure..except he is teaching revisionist history

    • @jsfbay1
      @jsfbay1 Год назад +2

      @@Scribeintheink Please share your criticisms.

    • @billhesford6098
      @billhesford6098 Год назад +3

      @@Scribeintheink Whether he is right is the question. There is surely no problem with looking at history and not agreeing with everything, like a regurgitating primary school child might do.

  • @josephsummers1148
    @josephsummers1148 Год назад +8

    I am so glad that the Lord led me to this series! Brother Gore is awesome.

  • @peterjansen8262
    @peterjansen8262 4 года назад +15

    I'm currently re-reading Chilton's Days of Vengeance. It's the best commentary on Revelation ever written and this series is the best on Revelation I've ever heard. God bless you Mr Bruce Gore.

    • @loidareyespuga
      @loidareyespuga Год назад

      Por favor tendrán para recomendar un libro en español sobre el tema ? Dios los bendiga

  • @dianawilliams6700
    @dianawilliams6700 7 лет назад +38

    Thank you for this teaching. After almost 28 years of being a Christian and not being able to receive other explanations that I've had to reject, this teaching is a blessing!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад +6

      Diana Williams Thank you!

    • @michaelcockroft2756
      @michaelcockroft2756 5 лет назад +2

      Bruce Gore I second Diana’s comment and am wondering if you could suggest further reading? Also, please consider doing a lecture series that covers everything in this last video in more detail. It’s just such a bummer that you had to rush through the culminating lecture! Thanks and blessings!

    • @keithelrod777
      @keithelrod777 5 лет назад

      Bruce Gore, thank you!!!

    • @davidwoods6015
      @davidwoods6015 4 года назад

      I'm very happy for you, our paths have similar landmarks and I know where you have been. Thank you.

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html nice. try this for more truth

  • @jessiebland7644
    @jessiebland7644 3 года назад +18

    Bruce I continue to be blessed by your teaching. I’ve only been listening for two days now, but you do an amazing job. Thank you brother, and I praise God for the opportunity to grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  3 года назад +5

      I am absolutely delighted to hear from you. Thank you!

  • @hjdoom3485
    @hjdoom3485 2 года назад +11

    I've been listening to these lectures while playing video games. It's fascinating stuff and I very much enjoy your style of teaching.

  • @WoundedEgo
    @WoundedEgo 2 года назад +14

    I eschew labels, but one I've been very happy to wear in the last few years is "preterist." This perspective not only unlocks Revelation but the whole of the Bible. Excellent exposition, Mr. Gore. Many thanks for posting.

    • @Scribeintheink
      @Scribeintheink Год назад +1

      That unfortunate since it is objectively proven to be false

    • @oracleoftroy
      @oracleoftroy Год назад +6

      @@Scribeintheink I love people who posture but show no ability to back up their claims.

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад +1

      @@Scribeintheink
      Yeah it's proven false whereas all the futurist nonsense has been proven right , especially when it does not hesitate to throw into a remote future historical details like the women grinding at the mill (Matthew 24 ) , the slaves in the Roman Empire ( chapter 13) , the sound of the mill which will not be heard again in fallen Babylon (Revelation 18).
      When we dive into the prophetic texts , we see very easily that they relate to very old things .
      Futurists have not only taken us for fools but they have also turned Jesus into a liar since they refuse to believe what he said in his Olivet Discourse.

    • @billhesford6098
      @billhesford6098 Год назад +2

      @@Scribeintheink Where is it wrong in your opinion?

  • @marthabautze6650
    @marthabautze6650 4 года назад +13

    Thank you for this sensible teaching, Bruce Gore. It is the balm of Gilead after decades of frenetic, sensational, rapture dispensational teaching. It washes over me like the water of the Word.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  4 года назад +2

      I appreciate that. Thank you!

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад +1

      Gore is COMPLETELY REFUTED IN ONE HOUR HERE: ruclips.net/video/ijquvtO2E04/видео.html

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад

      @@GoreBruce
      You deserve that because you don't lead us astray contrary to the futurist lunacy that SELLS and fulfill our cravings for sensationalism.

  • @davewyant7968
    @davewyant7968 9 месяцев назад +3

    I have been digging in this sandbox for 6 months and had written a 50 page 15,000 words and 415 scriptures regarding this topic.I had not heard of the Preterest movement so I did not search before I began my Biblical search. After I had finished my work I sat down in the Living Room and said to my wife "John's word has to be mis dated". that was the missing link for me.
    This presentation has been very helpful. It also answers the "raised up with Him" that Paul spoke of from 62 ad and beyond.
    Great work!!

  • @nigelhunter4230
    @nigelhunter4230 4 года назад +9

    Thank you Mr Gore for a brilliant biblical presentation of Revelation. I hope you can preach it throughout the churches in your land. Great message. Great hope in Christ.

  • @sparky4581
    @sparky4581 2 года назад +7

    I went through the first 10 sections in two days. I want to say thank you for the thorough details with just being factual on what i can see is the honest postions.

  • @larryeslick9397
    @larryeslick9397 2 года назад +3

    "Bible Prophecy was given to increase our Faith as the events foretold came to pass. The predictions of Futurism never come to pass. This false interpretation can never increase faith."
    "When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth,
    he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest!"
    These quotes describe my journey out of the lie, and into the truth about the egregious doctrinal error of Dispensational Theology, which I learned from Independent Baptists and their blinded allegiance to Cyrus Scofield and his reference bible.
    My inner self, through guidance from the Holy Spirit, found it much more rewarding to be honest enough about my mistaken beliefs and then reject them, and to embrace the Truth, rather than choosing to continue in the errors of my misguided persuasions.
    Your RUclips Channels have helped tremendously.

  • @annagaiser5186
    @annagaiser5186 5 лет назад +10

    I've watched this series several times now, and I am always blown away by your brilliant, concise summary of the book. I have a feeling that it is even better than it would have been if you had had the three weeks you thought you were going to have! Looking forward to your series in the Fall...just don't forget the most marvelous creature in Revelation, the elephant! :)

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +2

      Hmmm....the elephant? That must be hiding somewhere in the Greek!

  • @happydays310
    @happydays310 2 года назад +5

    Thank you for your presentation. I am currently reading Revelation and needed your video to help me understand what the book is about. Many thanks for your help.

  • @MrBqualls100
    @MrBqualls100 4 года назад +3

    Excellent! I so appreciate Mr Gore’s teaching, and especially his humble attitude!

  • @debbieward9732
    @debbieward9732 Год назад +4

    Gosh! What you said at the 9:27 minute caused me to cry. It touched my soul.

  • @Revolver1701
    @Revolver1701 Месяц назад

    I was only taught dispensational interpretation for most of my life and then I started searching out other ways of reading the prophetic literature in the Bible. Brother Gore does a fine job of this.

  • @lanardm9836
    @lanardm9836 2 года назад +6

    Thank you for continuing to do the Lords work as a faithful teacher. I wish Church’s would share all perspectives of eschatology instead of 1 which is an unfortunate deception as one who was once a dispensationalist.

  • @rickintexas1584
    @rickintexas1584 5 лет назад +3

    Thank you so much for this lecture series Mr. Gore. I now have a better understanding and better appreciation for this confusing book.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +1

      I hope you can join me in the fall of 2019, when I intend to start a two year series on this book!

  • @ThabaniPhoto
    @ThabaniPhoto 8 лет назад +8

    May God Richly bless you. Thank you for a truly engaging lecture series.
    As a former Seventh-Day-Adventist (I left the SDA church in July of this year) I had a completely distorted view of the book of Revelation. You have whet my appetite to finally allow the Jesus to speak through this magnificent book

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +2

      +Thabani Maphosa Thanks so much for such a kind and encouraging post!

    • @genesiskeglar6372
      @genesiskeglar6372 7 лет назад

      Thabani Maphosa Good for you!

    • @julieomusebe5996
      @julieomusebe5996 6 лет назад +3

      Interesting...the historical, continuous approach as taught by the SDA Church would seem to explain Daniel/Revelation better, there are gaps no doubt, but history is on their side....their view of the papacy as the anti christ also makes great sense

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html amen. try this

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад

      @@julieomusebe5996
      I'm sorry but it does not. They say that the Great Whore of Babylon is the Catholic church which makes no sense at all since Babylon in Revelation is a CITY where the sound of the mill will never be heard again and where the blood of the PROPHETS has been found.
      Did the RCC kill the Old covenant prophets ? Who killed the prophets but Jerusalem ?
      Jerusalem in Rev is called Sodom , Egypt and Babylon. And she rides the beast (Rome) because the Jewish elites had no king but Caesar as they said to Jesus . The Jewish elites were very close to the Roman empire.
      They Reformers read their hatred of RCC (they were right to expose all her wicked deeds) in the book , which is certainly not the way we should try to understand what is written .

  • @Jane-ve6eg
    @Jane-ve6eg 4 года назад +2

    I have only ever heard a slight description of this view from my historianist father (a teacher) who came from a long family line of the same. I always wondered about it. It makes a lot of sense. I can see through your teachings some good that has come out of each view as well as some folly. Your view I find comforting in the sense that it frees up the tension of an eminent "end time" and all it entails. It also stops blaming other schools of thought as if they become a salvation issue. The ultimate goal after all is accepting Jesus' forgiveness and believing in Him. To me all the other jargon are what separates us into different "tribes", but we are all of one faith. If we Christians can remember that and don't let them be our stumbling blocks we benefit all the more. Thanks for your wonderful and comprehensive history on the origins of each interpretation of Revelations. Thanks also for making it available on RUclips for homebodies like myself.

  • @donnat2793
    @donnat2793 7 месяцев назад +1

    WOW! This was the absolute BEST explanation of the book of Revelation that I have ever heard. Thank you so much. I can't wait to share this with my family & friends! God bless you.

    • @cerickson5256
      @cerickson5256 7 месяцев назад +1

      Check out his entire series where he goes through Revelation verse by verse - it's amazing and so worth the time!

  • @derickharman9820
    @derickharman9820 4 года назад +13

    this is all starting to make sense to me. Thx for putting this online.😁

  • @thejulesfather
    @thejulesfather 2 года назад +3

    Thank you so much Bruce. I can't thank you enough. Bless you brother.

  • @earthisnotaball
    @earthisnotaball 7 лет назад +12

    Thank you Bruce for your reply. I tend to agree with the preterist view of 70AD.

  • @irishhomedeemob677
    @irishhomedeemob677 5 лет назад +2

    Fantastic!
    Best series of videos on Revelation that incorporates church history on the topic to present.
    I was a Dispensationalist, then pre-mil, then post and more recently A-mil partial preterist.
    (Also studied Adventism, SDA, JW and Hal Lindsey 1988 *ALL* failed end time eschatologies aka 7 times cults)
    Thanks again for sharing God's light on this confusing topic and its history.
    Matinata 👍🙏

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +4

      Thank you! I hope you will be able to follow along with the series I'm launching this fall (2019) which will be a verse by verse study of Revelation.

    • @LuvBorderCollies
      @LuvBorderCollies 5 лет назад +1

      @@GoreBruce Looking forward to it. How did you like the Josephus Essentials book?

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +1

      I like it very much. I would make a great textbook for the right academic setting!

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html. more here for u

  • @aktrapper6126
    @aktrapper6126 5 лет назад +3

    Thank you Bruce, and thank you Lord for raising up teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the edifying of the body of Christ, well done and in only 48 minutes.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +1

      Thanks for your kind feedback. You may be interested in knowing that I am planning a much more comprehensive treatment of Revelation starting in the fall of 2019.

    • @aktrapper6126
      @aktrapper6126 5 лет назад +1

      Yes I am interested, I was raised with dispensation and have been making my journey out of it for the last 15 years. That theological system is like a leaven, once it gets in you its difficult to get it all out. Lord willing I'll get totally free from it and teachings such as this have really been helpful. I will subscribe to your channel so I don't miss your more comprehensive teaching next fall. Thanks again.

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html more teaching

  • @jwharris625
    @jwharris625 5 лет назад +3

    Thank you for the logical, lucid, and conversational words. They really helped make this very complex book much more accessible. I look forward to watching your other series.

  • @tolar9
    @tolar9 7 лет назад +2

    Bruce Gore: This is an incredible presentation. Thank you so much for it! God bless you, brother.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад +1

      ...and many thanks to you as well!

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html more truth here

  • @patriciahines7127
    @patriciahines7127 4 года назад +5

    Never 👂 revelation explained so well that makes sense . It amazing . Thanks 😊.

  • @sinfulpirate
    @sinfulpirate 4 года назад +9

    As popular as dispensational view is more and more ppl walk away from its inconsistent theme.. great teaching Mr Gore.

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад +2

      Preterism is way more inconsistent and is a fake narrative imposed all over the book!

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html this may help

    • @jermoosekek1101
      @jermoosekek1101 3 месяца назад

      @@smashmouth1001how is it inconsistent?

  • @FlatOutFE
    @FlatOutFE 8 лет назад +6

    Great series. Thank you.

  • @WJCharliee
    @WJCharliee 8 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks for sharing. Your lecture is very intriguing, and this comes from the mouth of a premillennialist. Thanks for explaining your position succinctly.❤✝️🙏😇

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 месяцев назад +1

      As a former premillennialist myself, I appreciate your feedback very much!

    • @WJCharliee
      @WJCharliee 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@GoreBruce Yes I have watched over 15 of your videos. A Nice contrast to John MacArthur... I got the full meal deal of all the experts on RUclips
      😃😁 ruclips.net/video/WKo3vn7OllI/видео.html

  • @mickeyanderson2540
    @mickeyanderson2540 9 месяцев назад +1

    Magnificent presentation , you are a gifted teacher ! God Bless !

  • @jaylonbachman
    @jaylonbachman 2 года назад +6

    I was dispensational/futurist for 12 years. After guys like Bruce Gore, Ken Gentry, Jeff Durbin, Doug Wilson, and others I have completely shifted my position to postmill/partial preterist.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  2 года назад +6

      Welcome to the 'not-dark' side, my friend. Blessings from our gracious Lord.

    • @davidjohnson1536
      @davidjohnson1536 Год назад

      Does that mean that you now believe in replacement theology?

    • @jaylonbachman
      @jaylonbachman Год назад +1

      @@davidjohnson1536 there’s no such thing…. Replacement theology implies the church has replaced Israel. Covenant theology believes, as scripture teaches, that the Israel of God includes all those of faith….. Jew and gentile.
      Ephesians 2:11-19, Romans 11, Galatians 3:16&29, Philippians 3:3, etc.
      This was all prophesied in the OT. Go back and read Genesis 35:10-11 and Genesis 48:11-20. Israel would be a nation of Jews and Gentiles.

    • @larrymcclain8874
      @larrymcclain8874 6 месяцев назад

      Yes, Romans 9:6 and Ephesians 3:1-7 come to mind also. Compare this to Revelation 10:7 and Revelation 11:15.

  • @billiamnotbob
    @billiamnotbob 2 месяца назад +1

    I remember when I was a new Born Again. It was a Charismatic Assemblies of God church that was steeped in the, for lack of a better term, 'Left Behind' view. I bought into it too for a number of years. Then, I progressed to not being concerned about it, (Eschatology) as everything was "just around the corner'. I think gary called it Newspaper Exegiesis. There was always another 'sign'. It wore me out. Then I started coming across Postmillenialism and their arguments. I also came across Gary DeMar, and I think I heard of Dr. Gore through him. I'm still more of a pan-millenial than anything else, but I'm in the partial pretersit camp. Dr Gore, thanks for being clear and straightforward. I appreciate your teachings as they are sober and common-sense. I sincerely wish I'd have come across you sooner.

    • @qwerty-so6ml
      @qwerty-so6ml 2 месяца назад

      TO ALL PRETERISTS:
      Revelation 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
      PRETERISTS take away from the words of the book of prophecy.
      REPENT, while you can

  • @andregodsey4557
    @andregodsey4557 9 месяцев назад +1

    Professor Gore did an amazing job with a difficult text. Congratulations.

  • @KattackalTomsan
    @KattackalTomsan 7 лет назад +6

    You have all the makings of a good teacher.

  • @jaredscotbrandon2593
    @jaredscotbrandon2593 2 года назад +3

    I’m really going against the grain in my church believing this view but it makes so much more sense. Thank you

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  2 года назад +2

      Be patient and pray.

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад

      @ Jared Scot Brandon
      We are not supposed to be dumb churchians who swallow all the lies we are told in pulpits (and not just concerning eschatology) but Christians who follow Christ and the Word.
      That pastors can teach such futurist lunacy is beyond me. Moreover , they are all incapable of teaching what Revelation is about . Just throwing the same eternal platitudes as the "antichrist" , the so-called rapture , the "great tribulation" .
      I'm sick of all that.

  • @annmariecampbell60
    @annmariecampbell60 2 года назад +2

    Excellent work! May God continues to bless you!

  • @75marklee
    @75marklee 9 месяцев назад +2

    The best and correct interpretation of Revelation Period

  • @sythpopwives5140
    @sythpopwives5140 6 лет назад +11

    Revelation is understandable if not stretched out 2000+ years. PERIOD and PERIOD!! Amen and Amen!!

    • @frikandelthaisaus
      @frikandelthaisaus 4 года назад +2

      True, but at least the last part (chapter 20-22) seem to be talking about our times (the millennial time) and the future (final judgment and New Heavens and a New Earth). I think mr. Gore agrees with that, right? I'm not sure if he's a partial, full or extreme/hyper preterist?

    • @frikandelthaisaus
      @frikandelthaisaus Год назад

      @@waynealan3067 Hi Wayne, in the meantime I have become a full preterist. So I have left the inconsistent partial preterist doctrine.

  • @ronnepomuceno7252
    @ronnepomuceno7252 8 лет назад +3

    Thank you for this clear overview of the Book of Revelation which many have ignored. Great presentation!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад

      +Ronald Nepomuceno Thank you very much!

    • @josephho3099
      @josephho3099 8 лет назад

      The Preterist interpretation of the bible is completely wrong. Paul already addressed their views some 2000 years ago in his epistle to the Thessalonians. 2 Thessalonians 2New International Version (NIV)The Man of Lawlessness2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, 2 not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by the teaching allegedly from us-whether by a prophecy or by word of mouth or by letter-asserting that the day of the Lord has already come. 3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.They were claiming that Jesus second coming was over, and Paul rebuke them. This Paul has already debunked the Preterist view. Its in the bible and the Bible being the Word of God cannot lie. This Preterist teaching Error was already addressed by Paul, so now we do not need to listen to such wrong teachings. Beware of people who support their own special interpretation and contradicts the bible, which is the Ultimate Word of Truth.Joseph Ho2 seconds agoThe Preterist interpretation of the bible is completely wrong. Paul already addressed their views some 2000 years ago in his epistle to the Thessalonians. 2 Thessalonians 2New International Version (NIV)The Man of Lawlessness2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, 2 not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by the teaching allegedly from us-whether by a prophecy or by word of mouth or by letter-asserting that the day of the Lord has already come. 3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.They were claiming that Jesus second coming was over, and Paul rebuke them. This Paul has already debunked the Preterist view. Its in the bible and the Bible being the Word of God cannot lie. This Preterist teaching Error was already addressed by Paul, so now we do not need to listen to such wrong teachings. Beware of people who support their own special interpretation and contradicts the bible, which is the Ultimate Word of Truth.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад

      Thanks for the helpful feedback!

  • @russelldavis4938
    @russelldavis4938 2 года назад

    Very nice and quite plausible. It can be used as a representative explanation of Revelation.

  • @maranatha5982
    @maranatha5982 Год назад +1

    Bravo👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼!!! Thank you soooooo much for this blessing 💡🕊📖❤️🍞🍷. God bless and give you more and more of his wonderful light 💡 !

  • @Holyfield3008
    @Holyfield3008 3 года назад +5

    Excellent and well done!

  • @trewmuzik
    @trewmuzik 6 лет назад +5

    Bruce, thank you very much for doing this lecture and for the massive amount of content within. It took me about 4 hours total to get through 48 minutes of material and I'm so thankful for it.
    I have one question. I've watched several of your videos and am just wondering which approach (to Revelation, prophecy) do you cling to the most? Thanks again sir!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  6 лет назад +6

      I 'cling' to the principle that every text of the Bible must be understood first, and primarily, in terms of its most probable meaning to those who were its original and intended audience. With respect to Revelation, I am planning a comprehensive treatment of the book beginning in the fall of 2019. Thanks for your interest!

    • @darinclinton8992
      @darinclinton8992 4 года назад +2

      Bruce Gore hey Bruce, I appreciate your in depth look at revelation. I do have a question about what you think the “new heavens and new earth” represents. That is the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around. Your study was very insightful, but most of the push back I get from this idea comes from 2 Peter 3:7-13 and Revelation 21 verse 1 and 4. Could you help shed light on how you resolve these with your understanding?

  • @stevedohoney7565
    @stevedohoney7565 Год назад +1

    For the past three years, the Lord has impressed upon me the idea of "God's original intent" and understanding the language and culture of the text involved.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  Год назад +2

      That, my friend, is the only proper starting point for legitimate biblical interpretation! Thanks for reminding us.

    • @stevedohoney7565
      @stevedohoney7565 Год назад

      @@GoreBruce I have shared these same principles and views for the past twenty-two years. Thank you for your clear and precise teaching.

  • @raydawgrules
    @raydawgrules 8 лет назад +28

    who is this teacher? he is awesome! love it! God bless him. Extremely informative, and on point. Excellent.

  • @Dave_Parrott
    @Dave_Parrott 7 лет назад +20

    i wish you had been able to give the full 3-part version of this lecture. there's just so much packed in to too little time

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад +14

      I agree it was a little rushed. I hope to return to this for a follow up at some point. Thanks for the feedback!

    • @B6LSchilke
      @B6LSchilke 6 лет назад +3

      Has there been a follow up? if so where can I find it.

    • @anthonykangethe3040
      @anthonykangethe3040 6 лет назад +3

      The follow up, is it out yet?

    • @moonchilddave
      @moonchilddave 5 лет назад +2

      Yes, would love to see the fuller presentation!

    • @lavieenrose5954
      @lavieenrose5954 5 лет назад +1

      Bruce Gore
      Ditto for more please.......thank you..

  • @byhisgrace302
    @byhisgrace302 7 лет назад +10

    Hello Mr. Gore! I was wondering if I may remix this video on my channel? I, of course will give all credit and link back to your channel! Thank you so much for your teaching! God bless you!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад +23

      Thanks so much for your interest. Giving credit to me is optional - giving glory to Jesus is, however, mandatory. Thanks again!

    • @ByHisGraceChannel
      @ByHisGraceChannel 7 лет назад +5

      God bless you!

    • @dafflad1
      @dafflad1 2 года назад

      @@ByHisGraceChannel
      Yes he does, be blessed from our beloved

  • @JRRodriguez-nu7po
    @JRRodriguez-nu7po 8 месяцев назад

    I wish to thank Dr Gore for a brilliant presentation. The fewer Christians, and Dr Gore is a True Christian, believe in the premillennial view the more likely His return us imminent. He will come when least expected, which is why I am a mid tribulation rapture believer who was CERTAINbHe wouldn't comebin 1988 or any other predicted date.
    Let the great apostasy come, as predicted.

  • @jeremiah5319
    @jeremiah5319 8 лет назад +3

    Thank you, Bruce Gore. Excellent presentation, like your others. I just finished your APOCALYPSE IN SPACE AND TIME series, which I found essential in providing a solid overview.
    I am most thankful that God has brought me out of the false premillennial view I had formerly accepted as eschatological truth, which I now recognize as error. I had been believing the doctrines of men without taking it upon myself to study the KJV and research the history. Once I was willing to prostrate myself before God and acknowledge that I knew nothing, the Holy Spirit could begin to reveal what God's word is really saying.
    It does seem that much history has been hidden from us or pushed away by deception and distraction. My research of the Jesuit Order has convinced me of their expertise in deception in their influence in the church and higher education, none of it for the better.
    Looking forward to hearing more of your presentations. Thanks again.

  • @KattackalTomsan
    @KattackalTomsan 7 лет назад +3

    Wonderful!

  • @shellyblanchard5788
    @shellyblanchard5788 5 лет назад +2

    I am glad someone knows how to break this down. A lot of preachers would think the guy on the white horse with a bow is the antiChrist.
    The sun turn dark when Christ died so that is part of what great day of the lord is, I believe.

  • @SavedbyGraceAlone1962
    @SavedbyGraceAlone1962 9 месяцев назад

    Bruce is spot on in his interpretation of Revelation.

  • @bobbyadkins6983
    @bobbyadkins6983 3 года назад +3

    I believe prophecy in the Bible often has a near and distant future application.

    • @Th3BigBoy
      @Th3BigBoy 2 года назад +1

      No prophecy is for private interpretation.

  • @RGrantJones
    @RGrantJones 4 года назад +11

    This is an excellent presentation! But one difficulty I have with preterist view of Revelation is that, although it relies heavily on the expression "the things which must soon take place" in chapter one verse one, this view doesn't actually hold that *all* of the things the angel communicated to John would, in fact, take place soon. The end of the millennium did not take place soon after the time of writing because the millennium only terminates after a extended period of time. The judgement at the great white throne and the descent of the new Jerusalem would not appear to have occurred in the first century. To me, the fact that only some of the events described in the book take place "soon" from John's perspective opens the door to historicist and futurist interpretations.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  4 года назад +10

      I certainly agree that there is some of Revelation awaiting fulfillment.

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад +2

      Gore is COMPLETELY REFUTED IN ONE HOUR HERE: ruclips.net/video/ijquvtO2E04/видео.html

    • @RGrantJones
      @RGrantJones 4 года назад

      @@smashmouth1001 - thanks for the recommendation! That was an enlightening video.

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад +1

      @@RGrantJones You're welcome./ He has lots of videos on eschatology.

    • @chazsmith6333
      @chazsmith6333 4 года назад +2

      My personal view is that it is complete and the things you mentioned have already taken place. The millennium was a short time. 1000 (or thousand thousands) was symbolic of the completeness at the end of the age. And that would be the Mosaic age. When Jesus gave the apostles the ability to bind and loose it was then that He took authority away from the Jewish leadership. This started the 1000 reign of the Saints. Though they had not suffered martyrdom yet, they soon would be. The judgement of the great white throne had to have taken place because the temple was destroyed. There is no Mosaic law today to judge by. The great white throne judgement was for those that were under the Torah. Jews today cannot begin to fulfill the Torah. Once the temple was destroyed then we know that God completed this passage. The New Jerusalem is the church and there is no more sea. This represents that gentiles are now part of the sonship of God. There was no temple. God the Father and God the Son is the temple. Are we not in that temple now? So, it is fulfilled. There is no sun or moon. Meaning that under the old heaven and earth you had rulers, those in authority lording the word of God over the people. Now, God lights up everything. We learn from Him We listen to Him. We have direct contact with Him. We are kings and priests before God. This is accomplished already. Revelation is fulfilled. Thanks be to God for His kingdom and that He tabernacles with us now.

  • @fluentreasoningchannel5778
    @fluentreasoningchannel5778 5 лет назад

    Well done Bruce! My favorite historian, inter Alia.

  • @thesheep6248
    @thesheep6248 9 месяцев назад +1

    I love your videos! Learning so much!

  • @jeffreyguse3379
    @jeffreyguse3379 4 года назад +9

    The preterist views, I think, make the most sense. Thanks for this straight forward series of explanations to a rather complex book. However, is there a literal second coming of Christ? The angels, after Jesus ascended into heaven, made it clear that Jesus would be coming back in the same way he ascended.

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html i agree. more here

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад

      Gore is COMPLETELY REFUTED IN ONE HOUR HERE: ruclips.net/video/ijquvtO2E04/видео.html

    • @bookface5566
      @bookface5566 3 года назад +2

      Off course, there is a litteral coming of Christ, all the church fathers, the Creed's and the apostles believed and affirm Christ's physical return, although Bruce is right that most of the Olivet Discourse already happened in 70AD, the 2nd coming is still FUTURE. The safest but still orthodox book I could recommend is the "the Paroussia" by Stuart Russel. Full preterism is a fairly new concept, promoted by Max King in the 70's and then continued by Bell and Don Preston.

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад

      @@bookface5566
      Is there a third coming prophesied in the Bible ?

  • @julieomusebe5996
    @julieomusebe5996 6 лет назад +3

    That you spent hours on Dispensalism and rushed through Preterism leaves one more informed on the former and less of the latter...still looking to understand Revelation with Daniel in mind: the wound of the beast from the land, the beast from the sea and its two horns, the 666, given that Israel is clearly the woman in chapter 12, the two witnesses

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  6 лет назад +2

      Yeah, some schedule problems forced that unfortunate timing. I plan to spend a full year (or more) on Revelation beginning the fall of 2019, so stay tuned.

  • @Frampa
    @Frampa 5 лет назад

    You did something amazing here, the entire study helps a lot, to untangle misinterpretations, some are really old.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад

      Thank you! I hope you can join us for the verse by verse series on the book of Revelation that I will be launching in the fall of 2019!

    • @lavieenrose5954
      @lavieenrose5954 5 лет назад

      Bruce Gore
      You betcha!

  • @robvest7321
    @robvest7321 Год назад +2

    So excellent 👏 👌 🙌 Love it!

  • @julieomusebe5996
    @julieomusebe5996 6 лет назад +3

    Is it true that Preterism has papal origins via Jesuits, Alcazar to counter the historical protestant view; References. The prophetic faith our fathers Vol. 2 Leroy Froom and G.S.Hitchcock, Alongside Futurism advanced by another Jesuit Ribera

  • @timothywang2564
    @timothywang2564 3 года назад +3

    Thanks Bruce. Question please. Jesus said in Chap 21, God will wipe away all their tears; there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, no pain, all former things are passed away. Are you saying this verse is fulfilled already?

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  3 года назад +3

      The New Testament takes a view that might be called one of 'mocking' death, because it has lost its sting, as the grave has forfeited its victory (1 Corinthians 15:50ff). The author of Hebrews says that Christ destroyed the one who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and liberated those who through fear of death were all their lifetimes subject to bondage (Hebrews 2). When death is coupled with 'sorrow, crying, pain' it is safe to say that 'there is no more death.' For us death is merely the glorious move from a place of joy here to a place of unspeakably greater joy there.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  3 года назад +2

      @Tony Rowan The promise of 'no more death' is only for those who belong to Christ. There is indeed eternal wrath for the unrepentant. This is what the book of Revelation calls 'the second death.'

  • @pinoychristianpilgrim
    @pinoychristianpilgrim 11 месяцев назад

    So simple and clear and literal...

  • @flamelily2086
    @flamelily2086 5 лет назад +1

    I have only come across this presentation recently. I am enjoying it. I have read the account Josephus wrote about the atrocities being committed in Jerusalem during the siege. It is sickening and the Jewish people in Jerusalem actually did a good job of destroying Jerusalem themselves before the Romans got in and finished the job. Some very lucky people managed to sneak out of Jerusalem and they told Josephus what was happening in the city.

  • @Dreblueskies
    @Dreblueskies Год назад +4

    Is this why the world has gone to crap? We are living in the enemy’s short time? This is depressing.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  Год назад +5

      There has never been a time in history when people have not seriously asked the same thing.

  • @Jesus_is_Lord_316
    @Jesus_is_Lord_316 Год назад +4

    I simply cannot dismiss Bible prophecy and write it off as being completed in the first century. There is so much one has to change and crowbar to make the preterist view fit.
    I could never be a preterist as it doesn’t line up with the Bible and doesn’t make logical sense once you study biblical eschatology.

    • @robcrobert
      @robcrobert Год назад +2

      Amen. They call God a liar

  • @savannajones196
    @savannajones196 7 лет назад +1

    Great series.

  • @thomasarthurmaj
    @thomasarthurmaj Год назад +2

    I’m open to it but I’m curious what your end-times theology is if Revelation only applies to the 1st century.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  Год назад +1

      My end times theology follows the classical creeds of the church. Jesus is at the right hand of God the Father, from whence he will come to judge the quick and the dead. Thanks for your interest!

  • @Devin40444
    @Devin40444 7 лет назад +3

    so what does this mean for how we as "preterists" should live our lives going forward?

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад +5

      Thanks for the question.
      First it is important to distinguish a 'preterist' approach to Revelation from 'preterism.' The latter affirms that all eschatological events took place in the first century, and that history simply continues thereafter with no terminus. The church has historically (and rightly) rejected that theory. A preterist approach to Revelation affirms that the book is chiefly concerned with events that took place in the first century, generally connected to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 a.m. That is the view I take.
      In this view, Jesus established his kingdom in the first century, declaring to his disciples 'all authority is given unto me.' The kingdom has been gradually but relentlessly growing since that time (as a mustard seed, cf. Dan. 2). We are called to 'seek first the kingdom of God,' that is, devote ourselves entirely to the growth by grace of the kingdom of Jesus. Jesus 'will reign until he has put every enemy under his feet, the last of which is death' (1 Cor. 15). At that point, history reaches its culmination, and Jesus delivers the kingdom to his Father, a finished work, to the eternal glory of God, and the blessing of his people.

    • @Sunsetdriver85
      @Sunsetdriver85 6 лет назад

      Vina D. Vine I agree with Gore on this. However, I am a full preterist which is what he described as my approach to Revelation and Eschatology. But contrary to many beliefs about Preterism, I believe that God isnt done with us and is still with us even after the events of Revelation have occured. I do believe the Kingdom of God has been established and now in this New Heavens and Earth, we are to be people who produce fruits (as described in Revelation 22:1-5) to be the healing of nations. In other words, we are to bring people into God's Kingdom. Most people do thing the kingdom of God or New Jerusalem will be a physical kingdom but thats contrary to Scripture: Luke 17:21. The Kingdom of God (New Jerusalem) is not going to be seen I believe. Why? Because the New Covenant brings so much more Spiritual things than the old covenant and many things in the New Testament seem to hint at a spiritual Jerusalem. Galatiom 4:26 says "The Jerusalem above is free..." Which seems to talk about a Jerusalem in Heaven. Jerusalem in the old covenant was the center of the Religion and where God dwelt. But in the New Covenant, God dwells in us (1 Cor. 3:16, John 14:23, and many more) and the center of Christianity is Christ...not even the Church itself but Christ. The New Testament also Calls our bodies a temple of God and where was the Old Covenant Temple? Jerusalem. Other places in the New Testament, We are considered a New Creation (New Heavens and Earth?) Such as 2 Cor. 5:17. This all connects to perhaps the New Jerusalem is us and the Christian community since God dwells in us because we are his temple now (Just like He did in Old Jerusalem in the Temple) and the New Heavens and Earth are us as new creations as well as Heaven being opened to Believers and Earth/ Humanity has a connection to heaven because of Jesus. Not the best explanation but all these things connect and I hope you can see it.
      Even though I believe All events happened in 1st Century, I know God isnt done with us and that everything just ended. I hope this helps everyone who reads this. Im writing this to help, not to start arguments or negatively criticize Bruce Gore's view. God Bless and keep studying God's Word.

    • @Sunsetdriver85
      @Sunsetdriver85 6 лет назад

      Vina D. Vine forgot to mention, since I dont believe God's finished, we should still follow the Commandments to our best ability and continue to preach to the lost.

    • @cloudwalker9036
      @cloudwalker9036 5 лет назад

      @@GoreBruce and there is only ONE resurrection, right? The "first resurrection" in Revelation 20:4 is spiritual, correct?
      I need this confirmation because I cannot find 2 resurrections of the righteous dead separated by 1,000 years and a future tribulation corroborated in scripture.
      Please confirm.

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад +1

      I follow the classic view worked out by Augustin, and followed by many others, that the 'first resurrection' refers to regeneration (cf. Rom. 6, for example), and the 'second resurrection is the resurrection of all people at the end of human history, in which some are raised to life and some to eternal death.

  • @FAITHandLOGIC
    @FAITHandLOGIC 7 лет назад +14

    Preterism is truth

    • @alanbacalso885
      @alanbacalso885 5 лет назад

      1. Where are they NOW(!)???
      2. ARE THEY STILL insisting ON THEIR DOCTRINES?
      3.Can you reach them w/
      umpg.blogspot.com/2013/09/t002-grade-i-repentance-kun-pagbinag-o.html
      4. include reach those you find needing more truths, and who is not ... We ALL therefore need TO BE REACHED ... preach & be preached with REPENTANCE as comprehensibly as PREACHED HERE!

  • @kovalanpachu
    @kovalanpachu 4 года назад +2

    A must watch for the body of Christ

  • @profvnsibiya5387
    @profvnsibiya5387 3 года назад +1

    We’re grateful Sir

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  3 года назад +1

      Prof VN Sibiya I am grateful to hear from you! Thank you.

  • @judypeterson3476
    @judypeterson3476 8 лет назад +4

    Bairdsley, I used to believe as you do until I realized, through biblical study, that such an approach comes from an attempt to make the Bible fit one's preconceived ideas. There is no interruption taught in the Scriptures. It is created by dispensationalists to accommodate their false presuppositions.

  • @willempasterkamp862
    @willempasterkamp862 8 лет назад +5

    Telling half of the story is telling half of the truth. seven seals, seven trumphets, seven vials, that's all OK. But when it becomes more difficult? What about the seven heads = hills = kings. Five of them already fallen, as John notes.Already in his time, just before he begins to write! Notice that ! Who are they? Who is number six and seven then? Who is number eight called the beast. It's simply history for us, isn't it?? Why can't they say it? IT IS THE KEY QUESTION ! AND THEY FAIL SO FAR. SOMEBODY ANY IDEA?

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +2

      Yes, good question. You might find the quite competent analysis by Dr. Ken Gentry helpful, "The Beast of Revelation." www.amazon.com/Beast-Revelation-Kenneth-L-Gentry/dp/0930464214/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1471611472&sr=8-2-fkmr1&keywords=ken+gentry+beast+of+revelationThanks for your interest!

    • @willempasterkamp862
      @willempasterkamp862 8 лет назад +2

      +Bruce Gore, Dr. Ken Gentry Says Nero is sixth. And he fails to tell who is seventh or eight ! That means he can not count to ten. I feel no need to buy a dvd from such a person or congressation. The debate is open HERE......

    • @willempasterkamp862
      @willempasterkamp862 8 лет назад +1

      Galba is third, eight is the beast itself not an head indeed.

    • @charlescapps3339
      @charlescapps3339 6 лет назад

      Willem Pasterkamp : Has more Truth than the all future lies. But I understand we are not the Head. Jesus is the Head.

    • @ancientastronauttheoristss9345
      @ancientastronauttheoristss9345 6 лет назад +2

      jhon describes a beast which looks like a leopard mouth like a lion and feet like a bear now where preterists lose me is when they say Nero is the beast becouse he behaved like leopard which is not in line with what the bible says the beast is a composite kingdom of Greece Babylon and Persia this according to the way I understand is the eighth king/kingdom which ascends from the bottomless pit which will cover the geographical areas where the three kingdoms covered

  • @fadihajjhassan9018
    @fadihajjhassan9018 3 года назад +1

    Thank you Sir.

  • @P.H.888
    @P.H.888 4 года назад +1

    Enjoyed your presentation, I see in your writing that you say throughout history there have always been Preteristism, I’d been appreciate what you have for 70 ad onwards

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  4 года назад +2

      You will find a decent and even-handed summary of the history of interpretative approaches to Revelation in Mysterious Apocalypse (Wainwright):www.amazon.com/Mysterious-Apocalypse-Interpreting-Book-Revelation/dp/1579106242/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=arthur+m+wainwright&qid=1590937548&sr=8-1

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад

      Preterism was made up RECENTLY. The only view that existed for the first 200 years of the church was premillenial futurism. Postmil is a recent delusion as well

    • @P.H.888
      @P.H.888 2 года назад +3

      @@smashmouth1001 not true.

  • @chrisnelles
    @chrisnelles 5 лет назад +4

    Of course the problem with this historical approach is that it creates exactly the same problem for every believer outside of the first century that it purports to relieve for those the book addresses. How come god gave comfort for those in the first century and left everyone else without guidance for whatever age they find themselves in? So that's problematic. You suggest the mercy of god forces us to adopt the historical approach and end by suggesting god is preferential.

  • @ZondyYT
    @ZondyYT 4 года назад +3

    Never heard such a weird stuff:
    If the most of the things in the book of revelation happend already, where acutually are we living right now? In the millenium? No, that cannot be, because it was only for 1000 years and we have 2020 already.
    We must be in the new earth, right?
    Oh man.... what a strange teaching!

    • @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua
      @BiblicalFlatEarthJoshua 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/PvP_Hg87luI/видео.html this may help

    • @smashmouth1001
      @smashmouth1001 4 года назад

      Gore is COMPLETELY REFUTED IN ONE HOUR HERE: ruclips.net/video/ijquvtO2E04/видео.html

    • @mchristr
      @mchristr 2 года назад +1

      @@smashmouth1001 At the outset Bruce Gore offered hermeneutical principles for interpreting literature, biblical texts included. Do you agree with his methodology?

    • @jrconway3
      @jrconway3 2 года назад

      Its pretty simply, and is the easiest explanation:
      The 1000 years is not literal. There's many usage of "1000" to just refer to a large amount throughout the Bible. The 1000 years year would just mean: "a very long period of time as the Gospel spreads out across the world"

  • @adeodata6364
    @adeodata6364 7 лет назад

    Hi Dr. Bruce, this series is truly a masterful work of art... intelligent, clear, respectful and inspiring. Every christian should be required to listen to it, most of all to be warned against the pitfalls of biased readings and interpretations of the bible, but not only. I always thought knowing history was an essential element for a balanced (faith-ful) life. You really made the case. Your students and congregation are very lucky! Congratulations and thank you SO much for sharing! By the way, are there one or two really good books you would suggest on the history of dispensationalism? I am more and more interested in its influence on messianic jews + evangelicals and their support for modern Israel. I may even write a book on the subject (in french), so they would have to be reliable and well documented books. Before spending hours doing research, I might as well ask a specialist :-)) Thanks again and God bless you!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  7 лет назад

      Thanks for your kind feedback. I suggest the following as a fair assessment of the history and teaching of dispensationalism:
      www.amazon.com/House-Divided-Break-Dispensational-Theology/dp/0930464273/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1488379179&sr=8-1&keywords=dispensationalism+house+divided

    • @adeodata6364
      @adeodata6364 7 лет назад

      Thank you very much for your advice. I've done some research but hadn't seen this one. It's nice to have someone answer on a Ytbe channel... it's seldom the case, and I notice you do it regularly. It's very kind of you! I'll be listening to most of your material, here and on your website. Great teachings, very captivating. Bless you!

  • @lancegaynor8378
    @lancegaynor8378 4 года назад +1

    I have a question here. At 12:42 of presentation you said that the 24 Elders are 12 from the Old Testament and 12 from the New Testament. How did you arrive at this conclusion?

    • @brucegore4373
      @brucegore4373 4 года назад +2

      I'm sorry this presentation had to be made in such a hurried fashion, due to the constraints of time. I treat the subject of your question in some greater detail here: ruclips.net/video/Vf_pHF5JooM/видео.htmlThanks for your interest!

  • @Antesdelfinadmin
    @Antesdelfinadmin 2 года назад +4

    Here's what happened.
    Like Jesus promised, he came back soon after his crucifixion and resurrection. He reigned for 1000 years starting around year 70 AD. The Bible promised he would reign for 1000 years and after that... (Quote): Rev. 20:2-3
    "And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
    2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
    3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season. "
    So, most people who lived in that millennium with Christ as king left with him and a few that didn't like it, were left behind.
    Then, God gave the kingdom to the devil for" a little season " to tempt the nations again. Rev. 20
    As of that great disappearance, or reset, we are living the days of the" little season ".
    In order to re populate the world, either there was a great resurrection of people who in the past died without knowing about Jesus or Satan mass produced children in an unspecified manner (Rev 20:1-5).
    But here's the best part:
    And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
    8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
    9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
    10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
    Preterists needed what we have found with this erased history, mudflood and Tartary phenomenon in order to make sense of their correct yet incomplete interpretation. Jesus ruled and reigned for 1000 literal years and Rev 20 had a literal fulfillment. We are now living in the little season of Rev. 20. Get your act together Preterists. People need your side of the story to make sense of all this information coming out!!

  • @marksteele45
    @marksteele45 2 года назад +2

    Revelation 1:19 Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter;

  • @VinithaSundaran
    @VinithaSundaran 6 лет назад +2

    So much information to contain in a 48 min video.. I hope there would be a more elaborate version on this topic.
    I find perterist version to be more meaningful than the futurism. I approached preterism with a lot of scepticism, but the way it changed the whole meaning of the Bible is truly amazing. As the Lord said, you will know the truth and the truth will set you free. I feel the freedom to its fullest now.
    When i believed in futurism, there was always a constant fear of the day of the Lord and always took measures to be pure and clean in case His day came upon suddenly. But when the evidence was laid that the day passed about 2000 years earlier and that we are currently living in the age of Christ and His peace, I was very relieved to know this and loved Him even more for all the riches in my life, that is Christ himself! Where there is love, there is no place for sins or griefs or other things that would bother your loved one, my beloved Lord.. I find it no longer necessary to take those measures to please Him, because His kingdom is already here, already in me!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  6 лет назад +1

      Thanks for the feedback. I am hopeful to do a more extensive treatment of Revelation within the next few months so stay tuned please!

  • @justinzeigler3001
    @justinzeigler3001 8 лет назад +1

    Can anyone explain the mark of the beast from a preterist point of view. I can see this meaning roman currency, but what of the mark on the wrist or forehead?

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад +3

      +Justin Zeigler Best to interpret symbols from Revelation in light of Old Testament parallels. The forehead suggests the intellect and the wrist (or hand), labor (Deut. 6:6ff). Revelation ties the mark of the beast to emperor worship (e.g., Rev. 14:11). Those who refused to embrace unconditional loyalty to Rome in their thinking and actions were frozen out of the market place (Rev. 13:16ff). For a thorough and scholarly treatment of the topic, see Ken Gentry, The Beast of Revelation (ICE, 1989).

    • @TheMaverickChristian
      @TheMaverickChristian 8 лет назад

      +Justin Zeigler Go to the original greek and hebrew writings and you see that the mark isn't symbolism. Head isn't thought and hand isn't labor.
      Mark in greek is xáragma - properly, an engraving (etching); (figuratively) a mark providing undeniable identification, like a symbol giving irrefutable connection between parties.
      Here it is referring to a badge of servitude or in context satanic slavery and damnation.
      Now the right and in geek is dexios: the right hand or side. Not exclusively a hand. Kind of like the arm bands muslims and nazis wear.

  • @dcrunicycles
    @dcrunicycles 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you again

  • @KevinAlawine
    @KevinAlawine 8 лет назад +2

    I'm really enjoying your wonderful teachings! Thank you very much!

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  8 лет назад

      +Kevin Alawine Thanks! Great to hear from you!

  • @echoblu5103
    @echoblu5103 Год назад +1

    Thank you for this view. I’ve reviewed the Historicist view, the Futurist view but I’ve never heard the Prederist view regarding the Book of Revelation. As a passionate believer who loves to dive into the Bible for knowledge and nuggets of truth I’ve learned to keep an open mind and not hold onto one view of the truth, for the truth is ever expanding and unfolding. Also, the obvious parallel of the past whereby it’s the scholars and men of higher leaning who had misled the Jewish nation into missing the truth about the prophecies with regards the the first coming of their Messiah, makes me a little reserved to putting my faith in one view. With that being said, the prederist stands that the book of Revelation has already been fulfilled because of the opening remarks in the first chapter, whereby it states, “to show his servants things that will shortly come to pass.” This statement is the hallmark of why all of Revelation has already happened. This remark did puzzle me and left me a bit depressed to think that we in the present day have no prophecy or hope for our coming Messiah. It’s like we are to just dangle in suspense unawares of the signs for the return of our Messiah. Then I read Rev 3:11 “behold I come quickly hold fast to which thou hast.” And in many places Jesus say this phrase that he comes quickly. Yet more than 2k years later he has not yet come. Maybe thinking that the words “shortly” and “quickly” are viewed by Christ as imminent to our time is incorrect. For a thousand years for us is but a day for the Lord. So yes those things in Revelation will shortly come to past and the Lord is true to his word when he repeatedly states he comes quickly because time for him is not the same for us.
    For those Christians who just want to believe there is no endurance for the church to be purified and tried and tested and to be made white as snow like the Christians who were persecuted for his name sake and followed their savior by picking up the cross and following him. It means you don’t deserve him. For those who want to save their lives will lose it and those who lose their lives will save it. Conforming to the idea that the prophecies are done and we are in a Utopia and all is well is a dangerous way to live as a Christian because “he who endures until the end shall be saved”. There is a trial to befall the church, the bride of Christ because look at the church. It’s a 40k denominational mess and the Lord needs to separate the wheat from the tears.
    We must continue to study all views and combine the truths together by prayer and fasting and constant wrestling with the Lord.

    • @bell5309
      @bell5309 Год назад

      In the “40k denominational mess” are 4.2 million churches and in those churches there have been billions of true Christians, both alive now and who have passed on.
      This is a pretty amazing feat considering at the time of Revelation, there were 7 letters to 7 churches!
      Jesus told us in the world we will have tribulation but He has overcome the world and as Christians we are in the world but not of the world. When we are saved, we are taken from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of heaven and our God, a kingdom that is not of this world. We are born again of spirit and we look for the life to come.

    • @framboise595
      @framboise595 Год назад

      @ Echo Blu
      "unawares of the signs for the return of our Messiah "
      Is there a third coming prophesied in the Bible ?

  • @RKarmaKill
    @RKarmaKill 5 лет назад

    Religous topics are such a bore. I know nothing about the bible book or mr. jesus. But I love listening to Bruce Gore explain it ! Thanks brohanski

  • @samsonm.m.5949
    @samsonm.m.5949 5 лет назад

    Mr. Bruce, as usual your naration and explanation is a song to the ear and a delight to the soul. God bless you for that.
    I have a question. I can see how important it is to have a grasp about how to study the bible. I wanna have a good understanding about the law of hermuenetics. Which book do your recommond? Espacial a book with plently exampls in its explanation. Thank you

    • @GoreBruce
      @GoreBruce  5 лет назад

      A good place to start for an introduction to biblical interpretation is the book by R.C. Sproul (with additions by J.I. Packer): www.amazon.com/Knowing-Scripture-R-C-Sproul/dp/0830844686/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1539108134&sr=8-1&keywords=rc+sproul+knowing+scripture
      A somewhat more advanced volume is the widely respected book by Bernard Ramm: www.amazon.com/Protestant-Biblical-Interpretation-Textbook-Hermeneutics/dp/0801020832/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1539108258&sr=8-1&keywords=bernard+ramm+protestant+biblical+interpretation
      Hope that helps. Thanks for your interest!

  • @zachpatterson434
    @zachpatterson434 Год назад

    The main issue I see here is that the view is contingent on a very early days for the book.
    Though it's admittedly a nice interpretive fit.