The case for Pete Buttigieg
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 фев 2020
- What’s the case for a President Mayor Pete?
Up next: The case for Bernie Sanders: bit.ly/2wdX38E
This video is one of a series in which Vox writers argue the cases for the leading Democratic candidates in the 2020 election. (Vox does not endorse individual candidates.)
The case for Bernie Sanders: • The case for Bernie Sa...
The case for Joe Biden: • The case for Joe Biden
The case for Elizabeth Warren: • The case for Elizabeth...
The case for Pete Buttigieg: • The case for Pete Butt...
And you can read our cases for all the candidates, including Mike Bloomberg and Amy Klobuchar, at vox.com/the-case-for
Update: Pete Buttigieg withdrew his candidacy on March 1, 2020: www.vox.com/2020/3/1/21121523...
If he won the 2020 election, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg would become the youngest US president ever. And at 38 years old, his age puts him in good company with many of the Democrats’ recent successful nominees: Barack Obama, John F. Kennedy, and Bill Clinton.
But as Vox’s Dylan Matthews argues, that’s not Mayor Pete’s only similarity with recent Democratic presidents. Like Obama and Clinton before him, Buttigieg has a way of describing traditionally liberal ideas, like expanded access to health care and higher taxes on the wealthy, in a way that appeals to voters who don’t necessarily identify as liberals.
So: What kind of president would Pete Buttigieg be? What makes him different from the other candidates in the race? And what would his advantage be in a general election against Donald Trump?
Read more about the case for Buttigieg on Vox.com: bit.ly/31qABF3
Subscribe to our channel! goo.gl/0bsAjO
Check out our full video catalog: goo.gl/IZONyE
Or our podcasts: www.vox.com/podcasts
Follow Vox on Twitter: goo.gl/XFrZ5H
Or on Facebook: goo.gl/U2g06o
A lot of voters: yeah this guy should be my president
Pete: I'm dropping out
I got this in my recommendation, on the same day he dropped out.
“my” president. pfffft
This guy is a CIA manufactured candidate. He also has only 4% support in the black community of which the democratic party can't win without so he should never have been taken seriously
👍👍
Homeboy really endorsed Biden smh
My political science professor once told my class that some presidential candidates run in elections, then drop out just to get their name out and known by the public so that for the next presidential election, they are more likely to win because of familiarity and prior supporters
And that if played well could well Make him next Presidential candidate because the experienced one will still be the candidate and people most of the time Prefer a well known or Experienced Senator/Representative than a new candidate.?
“They’re among the youngest presidents ever”
Laughs in Joe Biden
Unfortunately
@@greenmachine5600 no
laughs in djt and joe maybe being the first octogenarian(80 year old) pres candidates ever if they win the primary next year
Just wait until 2024
This aged poorly
This video made some big claims just days before he pulled out. Total miscalculation
Should have been called Case Closed.
@@RiskyNights what are you talking about? This isn't a Pete campaign ad.
@@ashumate Never said it was. A video making a case for Pete Buttigieg can still make big claims about him that were obviously not attuned what was nearly announced immediately thereafter.
Real quick too like 3 days quick
Pete changed his policy positions 3 times just during the course of this video.
The best (or at least the ones who win power) leaders are pragmatic, my friend.
@@JamesBond-rb1ln Go Pete! The guy who doesn't stand for anything except money and power and who will lie to voters to get it!
He likes to steal people's talking points so that's why he is all over the place
@@JamesBond-rb1ln and what good does that do to the voters, if the politician is in it for power's sake?
You need to believe in something, otherwise you are merely a pragmatic ball of amorphous slime
Pete hasn't changed any positions. He proposed Medicare for All Who Want It in February 2019, two months before he announced his candidacy.
“Riding along with Mark Zuckerberg....” I’ve seen all I need to see, Bernie 2020.
Most of his PAC'S money comes from big tech'
He also worked for McKinsey
That's a no-no for me
Bernie 2020
Haha!!!
Your so right. Facebook is a cancer
Do you guys use Facebook?
Breadline Bernie
“A serious contender for the democratic nomination”
*drops out 3 days later*
This video aged terribly.
Yeah it really just goes to show how exciting and unpredictable American primaries are!!! At the time the video was made he really had a good shot at being our president
That probably even hurt biden because nobody cared about politics anymore if there are no debates...
@@Jacobzx 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Ben K I'm sure you'll love the 4 more years of trump it earned you too 😄 pete supporters always seemed like the type of people who would rather have trump than bernie
@@_audacity2722 how did that turn out?
"Riding along with Mark Zuckerberg"
Lol as if that was positive.
😂😂😂😂
We’re all zucked if he wins
@sycam3472 what's your problem with pete
Riding with the reptile king :|
They aren't claiming that that is necessarily a good thing, they just pointing it out as an indicator for the validity of his candidacy. Mark Zuckerberg isn't going to be promoting a candidate that has no chance of winning.
Wish Yang was still in the race so they could’ve done one of these vids for him
Will Mcmeekin one trick pony who attracts elon musk fans and le epic memers
Pizza Rat a one trick pony with over 150 policies 🤔
@@WillWatches woah 150? Almost like he was a candidate or something
Yang supporters were wildly mean.
@@WillWatches still a one trick pony. 150 bernie policies.
0:34 Bernie getting 0 from corrupt billionaires. Nice
That's when you know he's the real deal!
Awab Qureshi he doesn’t want the money
@@bnzzai4882 Plus, he doesn't need it.
10% of all the 500 billionaires in the country have donated to his campaign.
Not all billionaires are corrupt
99% of the comments are “well, this aged well”
originality has never been youtube comments' strong suits
lol whos here after he dropped out
Forrest Estes meee, now that Tom and Pete dropped out, Amy needs to. You might as well when you can’t compete and it’s a waste of money. Clearly it’s Biden VS Bernie right now (Bernie prob gonna win though) I feel like warren is going to fight for her life to get to the top lol
Amy is going to drop out after minosota so she can steal delegates from Bernie. And warren is there to steel support from sanders and if anything happens to bernie in this months, she’ll try to grab the votes.
Bloomburg is there to try to try and get this brokered (or insurance if biden drops) and try to buy superdelegates votes
- ItzMocha - Amy and Tulsi both.
This is a very bad comment considering every single person that comes to this video until the end of time are going to come after he dropped out
People should go to Bernie now!! Don't F this up!
Will be interesting to see how this video series ages...
It will age because they are doing all the candidates, and the case for each candidate is for 2020 only.
@@Wasserkaktus He means in terms of policies and views. The way they describe the people in these videos, 3 years down the line, president or not, will they still be accurate? Or will they have changed their views and personas again to suit what the landscape is like in the future
This is only for the TOP 4 democratic candidates as of now.
And.... Pete just dropped out
...and it's over XD
Vox, it's contradictory when you guys say in Warren's video that she is the only one with a well laid out plan stating her push to take down filibuster and then say here that Buttigieg is the only one campaigning for taking down Filibuster. Please clarify
Crickets!
Nwoke Ideato Vox been real quiet since you posted this 😳
I think you answered your own question dude. Buttigieg doesn't have a well laid out plan to get rid of the fillibuster, while Warren does. Those are not mutually exclusive.
I think you completely missed the point of the videos and the articles if you think Vox is making any unified claim for one candidate or another. It is simply a set of independent arguments made for one candidate or another. There is no unified message, and if you are looking for one, then you missed the point.
Wording in this video was that Pete was "one of the first candidates talking about" it. It's not contradictory, I wouldn't even say it's particularly deceptive.
Vox: Unlike Bernie Pete doesn't name his enemies, so he has a better chance of winning.
Me: **looking at the current President** Yeah, right!
double standards. Democrats are also expected to make sense and be decent human beings...
@@Vinkiebut tHE BIBLE!!!1
Well that case didn't last for very long.
Just goes to show how dynamic and unpredictable the primaries are.
This video is part of a series of videos arguing the best cases for leading Democratic candidates for president. You can read the essays these were based on at vox.com/the-case-for
UPDATE: Pete Buttigieg has dropped out, but you can watch the case for Joe Biden (ruclips.net/video/4c5fuOPCeYw/видео.html) and Bernie Sanders (ruclips.net/video/1PjNlBV-_s8/видео.html) on our channel.
Pete Buttigieg is not it
Hey, @Vox will there be a: Case Not For..... I would like to see some of the detractors for candidates I think good of like Sanders and Warren more than what was in this video, maybe I just put an idea for some more vids in the creators heads :-P
Bernie or bust. Pete is a lying, two face, opportunist.
This is such a fluff piece
@@Chuubii Yeah but it would be an interesting thing to see A case against some candidate since a short video just doesn't go far enough and not everyone listens to the podcast
Eliminating the filibuster may sound good at face value, but keep in mind that if you have a Republican majority in both the House and the Senate like we did up until 2018, the filibuster is the one thing that saves you from a bunch of bad actors.
It would be much better to overturn Citizens United and get money out of politics so that elected officials represent the interests of the people and not the corporations.
Agreed. Wish dems would make campaign finance/lobbying reform issue #1. I think it in someways is the fundamental issue and they could trounce Trump with that priority.
It would be. But, you do understand you need a big majority in the Senate (60 votes) or a democratic Supreme Court to overturn Citizens United?!? So having the ability to overturn this policy (or any other) with 51 senate seats (so no filibuster) for which you need 60 senate votes), it would make it possible for your top priority to be accomplished. :) Please pay attention to the second part of the video; they literally explained all that to you. :)
that would be the reminder to care for politics and care to the congressional election. they are again easier to overturn
@Kent Horvath those rely on suppressing votes are def bad actors
@Kent Horvath good correction.
0:33 Glad to see Bernie has literally not even one billionaire
I love how sanders doesn’t even have a bar for “donations from billionaires “ haha
While Sanders has recieved no direct donations from billionaires he has accepted millions in donations from large corporations. He taken $660K from Google alone, which is more from a single donor than even Chuck Schumer's top donor has given.
Sanders has also taken hundreds of thousands from the likes of Microsoft and Amazon and his second biggest donor the University of California has billions of dollars in Government Contracts that are managed by the Energy and Natural Resources Committee that Sanders sits on.
@@centurion1945 Also, in regards to that source: It states the following.
"The money came from the organizations' PACs; their individual members, employees or owners; and those individuals' immediate families. At the federal level, the organizations themselves did not donate, as they are prohibited by law from doing so. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates." - with other words, unless I'm mistaken, this includes *individual employees of these companies who independently decided to donate*.
Draw your own conclusions from that.
centurion1945 He takes no super PAC money stop lying
Bernie is also a multi-millionaire. Pete's net worth: 100k.
@@cbates4545 Bernie made that money through book sales.
He is very smart indeed. Not sure how authentic he is. And its a little obvious that he doesnt know or doesnt feel what people are going through.
Pete is totally corrupt
Accurate.
Aung Soe his intellect is also becoming somewhat debatable. His grasp on languages has been disproven. And his almost identical repetition of Obama speeches is also becoming more and more apparent.
He's like an American Macron.
겔7 Good
겔7 ...but less genuine.
Exactement! C'est ce-que j'essaye de dire!
Omg there’s two of them. Dear god help us all
Macron is definitely the worst French president. Just a corrupt politician by the very rich, banks and multinationals, that won't hear the anger of its own people...
They are not same.
Pete Buttigieg just dropped out
Buttigieg is a corporatist
DeepSeaSqueezeTree Posted from iPhone
0:31
Sanders , ZERO donations from billionaires
Billionaires have tried to donate to Bernie. He sends the money back. Why? So he can accuse his opponents of "being funded by billionaires". It's clever. Refuse a small amount of money in order to insinuate that others are "bought" for accepting a small amount of money.
@m g When Bernie calls out Pete's billionaire donors, he's referring to 46 $2800 individual donations. That's it. It's a very small amount of money relative to the $100m Pete has raised.
@m g You have no idea how campaign financing works do you?
@@kylechalve Something called Super Pacs might want to read up on it
@@kylechalve Billionaires make much larger donations than 2 800$ through PACs, obviously they won't donate 1 million directly to a campaign since it's basically a bribe and illegal, but the system has ways to bypass such restrictions through lobbying.
I will actually get on a plane and fly to Vox HQ just to iron that shirt
Like really, just put it in the dryer after washing and fold it. Am I right?
As someone who doesn't benefit from the status quo, more of the same is not something I'm interested in.
How is he the status quo? he has a ton of reforms and changes similar to obama's ideas, have you actually looked at his policies? In the video it literally said he wants to lower the fillibuster to allow for more laws to be passed
@@Litro740 Obama changes were status quo, especially economically. Hence why senate flipped republican and led to Trump after.
Dude did you actually watch the video?
R. H.F. Yeah well now you’re voting for Biden. Wouldn’t you rather have it been Pete?
Pete likes to "consider" doing something. Just another talking head.
he wants a carbon tax theres no and ifs or buts about it. you sound like a talking head
Consider yes, then says whatever his doners tell him.
Carbon tax is a scam, wake up 🙄
@@customerservice9710 in what way?
Ross Cardenas Global warming is a scam
This guy sounds like an Obama impersonator
@JJoe yeah? Name one.
Deadass I said the same thing
There is literally a side by side video comparison showing Pete and Obama not only speaking in similar tones..... but actually saying the same lines....
@@SilentlyCEO just google lol
@@viralshark He's been doing that more and more lately..
These four democratic candidates will serve well as president. Once the primaries are done the party really needs to come together at get the front runner in the house.
All roads lead to the same outcome. By doing nothing besides opposing Trump and pushing their party left, Democrats have lit the match for Bernie to Bern the party down. What a show it will be. Some say it’s going to be biblical. Grab some popcorn and watch the fun.
"Pete doesn't name enemies" Because he's taking their money
Koopatroopa 15 did you not see the study that clarifies if you have more aggressive and extreme views you lose elections? If Bernie wasn't so aggressive he would easily win but calling ceo's murderers just gives money to Trump.
StewieT so Bernie should get on his knees and wine and dine billionaires like Pete did?
“If Bernie wasn’t so aggressive he would easily win”
Oh like he is right now?
gustavo lopez he is winning primaries marginally, he won't win the election
@@OffTheGridBand1 1. I wouldn't call Nevada marginal
2. More of his campaign is about bringing the working class
3. More republicans would rather vote Bernie than most of the other candidates
4. It's not good practice to only listen to 1 study, a meta-analysis is a better bet for an accurate picture.
@@OffTheGridBand1
"did you not see the study that clarifies if you have more aggressive and extreme views you lose elections? "
I guess that's why trump lost right?
So the case for pete is basically that less people in general will come out and vote. This does not sound like much of a democracy to me.
*fewer people...but yeah
@@MsZephyra Thanks
We aren’t a democracy. We are a republic.
@@ashikaganta191 A republic is a kind of representative indirect democracy.
Being a moderate Is the idea of considering the opposition's voter base as also part of your electorate as a pose to an adversary to overcome and subdue. That is about as democratic as it can get.
Can you do a case against all the candidates I feel like these are really positive
That's the point of these videos. To give the best case for the different candidate, of course it will be really positive.
@@charnelleleslie4521 true but I still think a case against each one should be released
Quinton Porter with this late date and with Super Tuesday coming wanting a video on candidates who are polling less than five percent worth it? At this point you need to weed out those not getting votes. Gabbard is prime example less than 2%. This series should have been done last year November or December.
This series should focus on the leading candidates and doing one on Warren is already pushing it.
Charnelle Leslie yep. That’s the point of my statement I want to know everything about a candidate. Doing another segment similar to this but giving a different focus on why they are not the best would give a well rounded approach.
Biggest challenge Vox could ever do: The Case for Trump.
A great series, Vox. Making the election more understandable for people outside the US.
Easier for people in the US to understand too LOL.
Still they leave out all the bad things. And mayor Pete has a 0%black vote because of his track record
@@isaiahjessieulloa4994 that's kind of the point though. They're making the case *for* candidates. They haven't talked about the negatives of any of them. 90% of the campaign trail is debate over the bad things of other candidates and how you have the least negatives of any candidate. It's important to remember that even though they all have downsides, there's a lot to like about any of the 4 candidates they've done one of these on. We need to remember that so we don't get blinded by the downsides and forget how significantly better any one of these candidates is than Trump.
@@amberbastianelli6025 I know. I still they they should do a negative and positive side in one video. Then everyone will raise Bernie 2020
@@isaiahjessieulloa4994 nah, Bernie supports Cuba 🤮😷
I'm pretty unimpressed with him. You'd think that someone who's 38 years old from a small Midwestern city with no national name recognition would be running because of reasons like taking on the system, seeing banks foreclosing on the working class, homeless on the street, etc. Instead he's running on being a young, fresh face of Al Gore and John Kerry. He seems like a pure political opportunist.
This didn’t age well...
This will be the fall of the Democratic party. No candidate other than Bernie has the ability to defeat Trump. We need to stop kidding ourselves, and these candidates need to stop being selfish. Drop out, and endorse Bernie. If they truly cared about this country, that's what they would do.
*Now I finally know how to pronounce his name :D*
They actually say it wrong
Boot
Edge
Edge
/'buːtɪdʒɛdʒ/. Quite easily, actually.
BootyLeakage
Buttjudge
ah yes, because running a moderate democratic candidate against a far-right republican candidate worked out so well in 2016
@Kent Horvath that’s what the first person meant... it’s called sarcasm my dude
Did you watch the video? His policies aren't very moderate.
Kent Horvath both Clintons handed the potus to the gop at different times...
It’s called “controlled opposition”.. look it up 🤗
Which part of Trump is far right?
Trump isn't far right. By policy, he isn't even Republican.
Riding around with Mark Zuckerberg should be an immediate turn off
Ashton Compton ikr.
Because he is rich? Why?
@@OffTheGridBand1 I should say this comment I made was mostly a joke. Mark acts strange in a lot of footage and it's funny. He isn't really a turn-off, but I say this comment was only mostly a joke for a reason. Mark is a billionaire, and as a society, we have a weird habit of worshipping billionaires. We think of them as being special, as if they were succesful all on their own and that their immense success makes them more valuable than the rest of us.
We care more about rich people and less about everybody else.
Pete is continuing this habit by doing this, and it shows something about him. If he were a more egalitarian candidate, who really sides with everyday working class people, we would probably see him riding with some complete nobody, hugging some construction workers, and speaking in front of a crowd of diverse people holding up signs that say "Bernie 2020" (yeah, I just did that)
I'll be honest I'm not *thrilled* about Buttigieg... but I don't hate him? I'd vote for him if he was the Democratic candidate, sure, but he's not my first pick. Really I rather hate how people only seem to notice him as a "nice safe centrist UwU" candidate to contrast him with Sanders. Were he standing on his own legs I think people would like him more. But since we have a *scary socialist* running too the panic police are coming out of the woodwork. I actually like his ideas, mostly, I just prefer Sander's ideas more. I'd rather we just elect candidates on what we believe they can do and not what we think other people will panic over.
Honestly, did no one talk about pete's really sensible housing policies? I swear we (as democrats) were talking about the homeless a year ago, I hope we still have a solution to the housing affordability problem
@@hiyashifalcion118 People presented him as this centrist when his policies on everything save Healthcare are *very* left leaning.
Still I liked Bernie just as equally as pete, at the end of the day I'm just looking for altruistic policies that would help my friends, the people in the hometown I grew up with, and the family I left behind. And I feel like a lot of people are trying to do the same
We can only hope for such a quality person to replace our current president. I've already voted for him.
Bootyseepage
@@customerservice9710 What are you, 12? Grow up--or go back to Russia, whichever the case may be.
gdouglas999 BootyLeakage
mayor pete: I want to run everything.
joe: you can have the buses
This aged well.
An interesting question to think about is why the "panic-driven turnout increase" indicated in the Hall study did not come into play for the 2016 Presidential Election.
Good point. That effect definitely worked on me. I spent a couple hours driving to the embassy and paid money for postage and parking just so I could make sure my vote was counted, not because I supported Hillary but because I opposed Trump.
Actually it did. But it came for both sides, because the right *really* hated Hillary. Why do you think Hillary even won the popular vote? She would have had a really low turnout if it weren’t for people scared of Trump.
I think that is pretty obvious, no? A lot of people under-estimated Trump. Polls also had Hilary with a healthy lead (She won the popular vote). There wasn't a lot of 'panic' because people naively thought there wasn't really anything to panic about.
As others have pointed out, it did happen. Hillary dominated the popular vote, which is the effect that the study predicts. It's the electoral college it doesn't affect.
But isn't he corrupt?
Who’s here after he just dropped out of the race?
at least he tried. i’m really pushing for an LGBTQ+ president
You want to know whether pete is progressive or moderate? Pay him and tell him what you want him to be. You will have your answer.
But of course if you want to pay him to lie to you about being progressive/moderate, he can do that too.
Santhoshi Srilaya Routhu Billionaires represent less than 0.2% of his fundraising
Pete hasn't changed his platform once. He has 1 million donors.
Facts. Dude is a robot
Kyle McDonald He was for M4A at the beginning. Now he’s not
He's a rat.
no
Huh, well this aged well
I'm still not convinced he's not a robot built by the DNC
He should be dubbed the Prince of Political Platitudes. How can one person say so many words and have so little substance.
He's a cia operative....
SaMiChi the prince of mayonnaise
I think he was created in a CIA lab? Yes?
Even though he dropped out, I don’t think we’ve seen the last of Pete. He will be president one day. I have so much admiration for this man.
Genna Marsh Another failure
is anyone else watching these to remember all of the other better candidates we may have had?
No shirt Iron's were available for the making of this video.
Well, this didn't age well.
Who's here after he just dropped out?
@Alex W. yup 😁
Look y’all, as someone from the Midwest who also lives extremely close to the city he was mayor of, I can promise you the city is such a mess and it always has been. He made some changes, but really all he focused on was better roads in the downtown area of the city and development in more wealthy areas. There was some focus on the low-income areas, but it wasn’t hard to tell it was being done just so people couldn’t get upset. The crime rate in South Bend is so extremely high for a city that really has nothing special about it. I’m not saying he’s a horrible person or that he doesn’t have a chance as a president in the future, but personally I think his current job as secretary of transportation is a great for for him. Like I said before, I have nothing against him, just thought I should share some information that the video left out.
Vox: If you look at the democrats who have actually gotten elected presidents in the last 60 years, they're amoung the youngest ever.
Joe Biden: Surprise!!
And also Lyndon Johnson.
This video is so, so necessary. Please watch it. You don't need to vote for Pete, but you do need to understand why so many people like him and want to - it is NOT for the reasons that Bernie's camp thinks.
This aged well
Pete dropped out.
When he dropped out, it may not have looked as though Buttigieg came to much, but as of today, he is the only person we know for sure will be in Biden's cabinet.
lets go pete!!!!
Ross Cardenas Failed mayor
@@customerservice9710 hes running on his experience. this dudes not afraid to put his record against any of the other candidates.
Ross Cardenas His record as mayor? He’d get a D, maybe an F for lack of effort
A week after 2020 election night and this video suddenly shows up as recommended
I wish people watched the video first before breaking their keyboards for imaginary stuff about Pete
Thank you - People here don't actually care if pete is a good candidate, they just think the best way to help their own candidate is by tearing down literally everyone else.
2:57 eventually, Vox is going to be so edgy and hip, that the people will be doing interviews with their backs to the camera.
You realize that there are two cameras? That camera you see in the frame is doing a typical over-the-shoulder shot. There is nothing new, edgy, or hip here.
That’s because vox is too cool for school.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
RaymondHng Its a joke.
is this... an attempt at humour??
Honestly I like Bernie Sanders, but his voters/fans are really aggressive on the internet.
Because of the injustice we see and those looking to calm us rather than actualize that justice. Anger at the face of that injustice and discrimination is the right response. I just hope it's not geared at you personally. It should be directed at those responsible for representing us and our will.
@@Bc232klm it's good to see injustice, but being rude is bad for your candidate and the overall climate of discussion. At least that's what I think watching American politics from Germany
I've found this to be, for better or worse, the nature of internet discourse-- it is in no way unique to Sanders supporters. I also find that most of his supporters, including myself, will argue vociferously for the policies they believe in. I hope nothing's been directed towards you personally, of course, but I also hope internet noise doesn't undercut the strength of the policy proposals. We want to improve the lives of millions of people and know the only chance to do that is to stand together and fight for it-- which is what makes mantra 'Not Me, Us' so powerful.
This is such a good series; while I do not agree with Pete Buttigieg and probably wouldn't vote for him in the primaries, you laid out his platform, his strategy and the argument for his electability in a respectful, even-heeled way that is such a fresh air. You show his good qualities convincingly, but not in an overblown way. Thank you guys so much
Excellent video, really helps get a better perspective on the guy. He branded himself moderate, perhaps for political expediency, but was in reality a strong progressive, who was also gracious. Quite an unfamiliar combo in the day and age.
As a Canadian, imma just stay out of this discussion...
Beenadd Sebhat then why did you even comment
If Justin Dildeau were American he’d be the most feminine candidate
Customer Service
There’s nothing wrong with that. I admire many feminine traits. Unless you really harbour bitterness for half the population, I’m guessing you would, too.
@@zain4019 L
If you’re NOT Canadian, then why are you responding?
Mari usque ad Mare!
Riding with Zuckerberg? Ah, there goes my hopes with Buttigieg
He gave Zuckerberg a tour of South Bend when he was Mayor.
5:17 "candidates who are more extreme tend to not be elected". Oh really?
Who was more extreme in 2016? Trump.
Who was more extreme in 2008? Obama or McCain? Obama.
2012? Obama again.
This notion that "extreme" candidates don't win in presidential elections is just incorrect now if you look at the 3 most recent elections.
Tend doesn’t mean always there are more chances to be elected if you are not extreme.Imagine 60% to 40% it doesn’t mean always
Andrew Yang didn’t make an appearance.
Just like the presidential democratic debate.
*BERNIE 2020*
@Sasuke Uchiha 🙄
Breadlines
Imagine thinking "hauling in cash from wealthy donors" is a good thing.
Tells you a lot about Vox partiality.
I don’t see what the issue is explain please?
@@davidgafo Vox never brought it up as a good thing about him.
They used it in a video titled the case for Pete Buttigieg in which they promoted Pete Buttigieg. They also never directly said him being young was good, but it was very much implied.
@@crusher9913 Nothing. They're reading in corruption when it's not there. The combined contributions of billionaires if maxed would comprise less than 0.15 percent of Buttigiegs money. That little corrupts nobody.
well this aged well...
The case for Buttigieg seems to necessitate more comparisons with other candidates, somehow.
Discursion than what he [can] actually do. You’re a Brilliant Saint
@@menawogu220 Umm.
Almost like he has no political identity of his own...and just recycles the ideas of the past...(especially Obama)...
What I have learned about the democratic candidates is that Pete is a liberal trying to paint himself as a moderate, and Bernie is a moderate that paints himself as a revolutionary. And Mike Bloomberg is Donald Trump trying to paint himself as a Democrat.
Love the timing of this one showing up in my recommendeds
Big fan of Mayor Pete! I hope he gets the nomination. The only truly unifying candidate on the board. We don’t need any more polarizing old men as our presidents.
UPDATE: He has left the democratic race.
Interesting shirt to wear during an interview.
Timestamp might help
@@Floedekage Entire video the interviewed guy bith a dark blue shirt. Not even ironed. I mean c'mon.
I think you're like one of the 3 people interested in the Oregon Shakespeare Festival
Oregon Shakespeare Festival, nice
i liked it
I’m so tired of the Bernie Cultists acting like Trump cultists in the comments about Pete. Everything we hate about Trump’s personality; the bigotry, the bullying, the paucity of information, the immaturity, the vitriol, the narcissism...that’s all the ammo the Bernie Bots have got against Pete. If the nominee is Bernie, I’ll back him. But if Pete is the nominee will Bernie Bots vote for him, or do what they did 4 years before and let Trump win because they stayed home or voted for Jill Stein on Election Day? Stop the hate. Be the change you want to see...in all ways.
Aged faster than milk.
I’d like to see him run in 2024.
He may be the most phony candidate ever.
@@jimmylogan1866 He flipped flopped on Medicare for all. He flipped flopped on Super Pacs. He is dishonest about ONLY recieving the max of $2,700 from his 50 billionaire donors. He is only showing interest in issues concerning blacks now that he needs their votes(he just got dismissed by a group of black protesters and had to run away from them). He used blacks that never said they supported him in an ad and had to apologize. He never been vetted about his role in the firing and demotion of his black police chief and black fire chief.
Yea, he's sooo phony. Just because he's good at talking... Lol. PETE 2020
@@YuhNinja He is the Ben Shapiro of the left, talks well but says nothing. He does do a great Obama impression when he plagiarized him over and over again
@@YuhNinja yeah that's right ignore all the glaring evidence of his duplicitous and self serving nature and say we're hating just because he talks well. great logic 🙄
@@masterofmashup1737 He proposed Medicare for All Who Want It in February 2019, two months before he announced his candidacy. He hasn't changed his platform once.
How does this guy have such a wrinkly t-shirt? Did he know he was going to be on camera?
Is that really an issue for you?
Im not from the US. Can someone please explain why "Stronger regulations of financial industry" is considered a liberal idea over there?
You're conflating American left-liberalism with classical liberalism.
Great video! Definitely makes a strong case that someone who is calm, steady and knows how to talk to people across the political spectrum has a better chance of beating Trump than a candidate who just makes everyone angry.
You kidding, right? Pete talked over Sanders on last debate so he couldn't explain the numbers of his policies, which actually Pete asked! That's not talking calm. Also, Sanders has a record (not as good (thogh knee bending) as Biden) in working along republicans.
The fact that most of the video is about "why he can beat Bernie" and not much about his policies or any other candidate kind of tells you everything you need to know.
It goes into his policies too though. Honestly, it went into them more than Bernie's video.
Why half of it Is speculation against Bernie?
I miss Yang. I ain't even American. But he was cool.
Swede here. I think either Yang or Bernie will do some great things for the US. Yang will totally be there in the next election :)
@@amanduswestin9211 my thoughts exactly
Love the “I’m too smart to care about my appearance” look.
Man, that's a really good video.
Kommentator 🐀🐀🐀🐀
If Mayor Pete wins the nomination then he’ll have my vote.
But not before then.
After watching all of the "The case for" videos from Vox, I can confidently conclude that I will "Vote blue no matter who". They all have they're good and bad parts, but they would all make good presidents.
You know our overton window is dramatically further right than the rest of the developed world when pete buttigieg is called liberal
With all due respect...
Squeak squeak
Ah, journalism.