I suspect that they did indeed have the room bugged. They must have thought that they were talking purely in code, or just saying weird stuff to mess with them. "Ahh, they say apophis. Could that be code for democracy?"
@@KnightRaymundit was based around character. O'Neill has a hatred of them that's portrayed like they make his skin crawl & so the way he says it is tinged with racism. Sam, Daniel & Hammond have a less extreme version that's kinda like the real, Teal'c & Tok'ra always pronounce them correctly
Being knowledgeable in foreign languages automatic response in the language you are being addressed in is for most automatic. When engaged in dialogue with two people using different languages which you are fluent in you develop the ability on a subconscious level to be able switch back and forth between them. This is why translators of certain languages are in high demand. French was once the main language of diplomats even though other languages where in far greater use. As once Greek and Latin were. In many languages there are different dialects such as Chinese being able to master all of them is a real feat. Even in English Americanese is different from British English as is Australian English. Words or slangs very greatly in meaning and use.
@@PerfectAlibi1 That's a waste of perfectly valid reverse psichology explanation. However, I am not sure the cowboys are aware of the very existance of reverse psichology...
except we now know that time is a one way river, any change you make in the past does not alter our present, rather it creates a multiversal timeline from the point of origin, the flow of time cannot be interrupted, only diverted.
the problem with time travel is that if it is within the same timeline, there never was a grandfather paradox, you didn't kill your own grandfather in the past so you can't go back in time to do it, as it never happened.
Yeah, the paradox is moot, because if you do travel back into the past, said past becomes your present, because you are there. Therefore killing your grandfather would have zero effect on you, because you already exist as you in that timeframe. If you do not kill your parents and stay there, you will end up witnessing the birth of a person you would consider being you, but it is just another person.
@@Phrew there are several different ideas on how affecting your own past might work, in regards to time travel. the difference between them is basically in your own actual timeline or you create a new splinter timeline that is now different from your own, as you were never in your own past when you experienced it the first time around.
@@johng.1703 Only in Tv shows and movies. If there was ever a real situation involving time travel, experts would treat it like how @Andeas Kist describes it.
"Time is an arrow", "Time is a river", "Time is a snowball", pick your narrative metaphor. Because (as far as we know) time travel to the past is impossible so temporal paradoxes are just theory without application. The Grandfather Paradox is (as far as we know) a thought experiment more in the realm of logic and philosophy than of science and physics.
You first have to define Time Travel.. As you can theoretically view the past...You just can't interact with it...Einstein Theory shows that is possible... But for someone to travel back in time. Opens up Pandora box.. As how can you travel back in time. If you changed time...And never existed? And if you never existed. How can you travel back in time... And who is to say it has not already happened...
0:42 wasn't history changed millions of years ago when a team on Atlantis went back in time which in their timeline they all have died. Then a new timeline was created when a antlantian scientist knew of their coming provided some ZPMs to prevent them from dying like on the original timeline.
Also there's a boot strap paradox going on in the timeline as sg1 learn on abydos that there was a rebellion on earth 5,000 years ago, and when they went back in time to steal the zpm from ra, because they knew the rebellion already happened in their past, they ended up causing the rebellion to happen in their future
In the stargate movie they learn there was a rebellion on earth 5,000 years ago, and in the season 8 2 part finale they go back in time to steal a zpm off ra, and because they know that the rebellion happen they end up causing the rebellion 5,000 years ago, it's season 8 moebius part 1 and 2
The interview took place when SG1 traveled back to 1969. Star Trek had been on television from September, 1966 to June, 1969. There was good reason that the interviewer was aware of Captain James T. Kirk. A Blooper????
I love how Carter is have this conversation inside the cell like security inside the base aren't listening to everything that's being said, they are probably video recording it as well. Hell, Carter and company already know that they were being video recorded inside the missle silo, yet she has this tell all conversation anyway.
Plus the facility wasn't really built with holding and interrogating prisoners in mind, mostly IF someone made it that far into the base (and they had no idea how the SG team made it that far into their base) they'd just stuff them into a convenient room until they could be transported to the real interrogators
You have to make some concessions in order to have a television show. Yes the guard outside the door would probably have heard something and yes they could have bugged the cell, but it would be a bad scene to have everyone sit there and say nothing.
You know she's accepting just one *theoretical* consequence of time travel as if its a fact. Last time I checked when it comes to time travel there are at least half a dozen possible side effects of it occurring. Like the Multiverse theory where by time traveling your creating a entirely different universe or its possible that this is a single timeline theory like we see in Harry Potter.
@@MybeautifulandamazingPrincess Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@Ragitsu I agree, he should be familiar with the topic since he's supposedly got a doctorate, this is also a physics topic though, so Carter would be familiar with it too
The math for time travel works, but only if you never "cross your tail." That is, no particle which time travels can ever occupy its own space-time frame twice. This means nothing you do in one space-time frame affects any other space-time frame. Each frame is its own reality, essentially, and you can only revisit it once.
Bug in 1969? Even there were silicon based partial conductors back in these days, it was still an early stage and such transmitter would be quite large and pretty noisy, giving out that it is actually listening (unless that they hid it somewhere else and ran wires to microphone hidden behind a wall). FM transmission wasn't invented yet and AM trasmission would be extremely power consuming for just listening to a conversation. They might have it wired, just a microphone from behind a wall running through wires directly into output, but transmission microphones were quite large back then and they would need to cut some holes to the wall where the microphone is placed in order to capture a clean conversation, therefore giving out the location of the mike, which isn't particularily convenient. The room would need to be dark and the mike would need to be hidden in even darker area. Sure, some bugs (wired) did exist back then, but the fact that the facility was primarily testing missiles and it wasn't designed for holding prisoners for interrogating, clearly discards this idea. But I see your point here.
@@VideoAmateurLuxembourg Still, that facility wasn't used to hold prisoners for interrogating, it was used for testing missiles. What point would have a bug in a facility where no tresspasser could ever cross their feet?
Shouldn't they have come out of the Stargate in the storehouse where it was stored at the time, before Catherine Langford reactivated the program? I assume they changed this whole "stargate was there and then vanished" for later episodes and movies.
They also probably had modern guns, which while we don't think about as being advanced, would still have been 30 years ahead of anything available. If not overly more advanced, then at least seeming to be from an unknown(/secret?) manufacturer and deserving of further investigation
There's nothing wrong with just observing history as long as one obeys the temporal accords. Oh, wait that's Star Trek ENT. LOL! Small joke. A man named Daniels(no pun intended) gave himself a Starfleet enlisted rank and served on a twenty-second century Starfleet vessel under Jon Archer's command. The time traveling operative was from the 30th or 31st century.
0:49 thats not even the problem, given we're just assuming thats how time works for some reason. the problem is if we change the past, we're no longer *us*
@@CD-Freedom Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@Ragitsu Daniel has always been more interested in the exploration and adventure aspects of time travel. While Sam has been more fearful of disrupting the timeline.
What if you become your own grandfather? Or better in Carter's case, your own grandmother! (meaning she'd needed to stay in that time for 9 months and give birth!) XD
@@PerfectAlibi1 Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
Nice chipmunk voices lol. When she said First Prime of Apophis Teal'c sort of seemed to reconsider it in his mind as "Hmm maybe it was not such a bad gig afterall". BTW Apophis might wave on by in 2068
They talk about the grandfather paradox in a universe where the multiverse is confirmed to exist. Any attempt to change their past would just create an alternate timeline.
That's what happened in the Stargate SG1 Apocalypse trilogy: SG1 gets thrown about a hundred years into the future during season 3. As a result since this was right before O'Neill's mission to expose the rogue NID off-world operation, Earth gets removed from the Protected Planets Treaty and falls to the Goa'uld. A Wraith faction arrives about 40 years later due to discovering Atlantis after it rose to the surface when it ran out of power and used a worshipper with the gene to fly it to Earth. During the books, SG1 teams up with both a smaller Wraith faction that wants to return to Pegasus and the Goa'uld System Lord Hecate who is using Janet Fraiser as her host in order to free the planet. They also have to deal with a plot to create Goa'uld-Wraith Hybrids. During the last book, O'Neill and Carter find the Time Jumper on Atlantis and use it to go back in time and prevent their past selves from ever getting trapped in the future in the first place. While they succeed, its basically an Avengers Endgame type scenario: changing the past doesn't alter their own future and instead creates a split-off alternate timeline. So they return to the future having learned that Hecate was actually behind them getting trapped there in the first place. They help the friendlier Wraith faction take control of Atlantis and defeat Hecate. A year later, Earth is rebuilding and O'Neill uses Atlantis to return the Wraith to Pegasus.
@@WarGrowlmon18 Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
How can such smart people, think about changing the past to get rid of bad things, and not consider that changing the past, involves changing the future they are a part of.... I mean come on. What. They didn’t have back to the future in this universe?
Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
"Grandfather paradox" is only valid if the grandfather *has not already had children!* I and my brother are are an example of this. Our grandfather died before our parents were even married. However, obviously my grandfather had a son before he died which is why I'm on RUclips writing comments today (instead of doing other things that need to be done.) ::smile::
Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@WillCamx That's exactly my point. Coincidentally, I was reading an article the other night entitled "Time Travel for Beginners" by Dr. John Gribbin in the Stargate anthology "Stepping Through the Stargate: Science, Archeology and the Military in Stargate SG-1" (excellent anthology, especially for science nerds like me) where Dr. Gribbin actually explains how time travel may actually work using wormholes and, to a certain extent, the mechanism that Kip Thorne and others used to come up with a theoretical way of actually doing it. As my ex pointed out, however, we may have had the equations for time travel back in the 18th Century, but we still don't have the *technology* to do it. Anyhow... I digress.
@@kalinystazvoruna8702 These are the possible ways I see time travel playing out 1 Any thing you do in the past has already happened since you were there in the past. or 2 Anything you do in the past creates a new time line and an alternate reality which you are now living in instead of you original reality.
@@WillCamx Yes. That's exactly what Seth (from the new age Seth books "channeled" by Jane Roberts) back in the 1970s said. Apparently, every time you make a choice you shift into a an alternate probability (an alternate Reality would have the fundamental laws of physics being changed; e.g. the spin, electric charge, etc. of fundamental particles would be slightly different). I've actually experienced this back in the 1980s, and was rather shocked about the whole thing! Now if I can only shift probabilities so I win at the lottery for more than $40!😸
So Carter and they all happily chat loudly in a top secret facility that likely is bugged up the wazoo with cameras even maybe behind mirrors or walls etc. I thought this was absolutely stupid on Carters part.
Odd. Jack seems to get the paradox issue and Jackson seemed to know nothing about it. Maybe they already changed history and jackson got dumb. Heheheh.
Let's say you time travel to prevent ww2. Then you end up ww2 later but with nuclear weapons. Which should make you realize that ww2 happening when it did is actually a good thing.
It is. They kinda overdoing "soft" sounds. However, it is still one of the best language spellings that I remember from any TV-serial that is not Russian.
Seriousely, Carter, I thought you were smart. If you were to go back in time and try to kill your grandfather, there's two possibilities: either timetravel works on multiverse theory, or it doesn't. If it does, then you kill your grandfather and create a branching timeline in which your grandfather was killed, but your present remains unaffected. If it does not, then due to the fact that you must exist to travel back in time and kill your grandfather, established events dictate that you will not succeed in killing your grandfather and may even be the reason he was alive to conceive your father in the first place. The situation where you erase yourself like in Back To The Future, or come back to a changed present simply cannot manifest, and simply by being in the past, or rather, having been in the past, which equates to the same thing (being having been in the past, I believe, if you want to be having been will getting all technical with verb tenses when time travel is involved), you will have already been part of the history you came from, and as such, you cannot change anything, because anything you do/did already contributed to the present you came from. Either that, or you create a branching timeline and the present is still unaffected. Though I want to note that I think this latter option is less likely because it requires for there to have been a "time" (for lack of a better term) when you did not yet travel to that point in history, meaning that time must exist in some sort of lateral dimension as well, a time outside of time, if you will, in which the timeline of timetravel is stored. Ockham's razor prefers my former explanation. Time travel. No continuity risks involved.
Its funny actually that I read while ago about what time travel in Terminator franchise means....and the most popular theory definitely seems to be branching/alternative timeline, where each movie is actually set on its own seperate timeline, cause each time the history is changed, atleast somewhat. So even in the original movie, its not the "original" timeline cause in the original timeline ofc no-one was sent back in time and Jugdement Day happened in in 1997 and its even said that Terminator 2 and 3 are all on seperate timelines as well. Either way its quite suprising actually that from what I've read from actual scientific articles time-travel back in time mightactually be possible in theory, but ONLY to the point where this time-travel machine was started the first time and you stepped into it, thus it would also eliminate the possibility what is many times played in time-travel stories where two versions of you, the past and the present could exist at the same time, let alone the grandfather theory.
Balnazzardi Interesting, since as I recall, in the first movie Reese specifies to Sarah that he's from "one possible future" before mentioning how he doesn't know the technical complexities, and the message from John is all about how the future isn't set in stone.
"Are you soviet spies?"
-Niet.
The best joke in the whole god damn series.
Perfectly shows how Daniel is book-smart, while Jack is street-smart
I especially love the fact that Jack is also fluent in russia but he would never fall for it xD
Testament to its power that, even after seeing it multiple times over the years, I STILL instantly reacted with a facepalm and "Oh, JESUS, Daniel!"
This is like "Are you gods?"
The Vulcan Science Council has determined that time travel isn’t possible.
Gary 7: "oopsie"
I always thought that was the dumbest recurring thing in that show,
Was that before or after Spock whipped up the calculations for a solar slingshot maneuver using a Klingon ships computer?
@@scifiswordsman before. It was in Enterprise
@@scifiswordsman how many times did they time travel ... I lost track of that in star trek LOL
Happy Teal’c: Indeed
Sad Teal’c: I see
Do you mean their holding cell isn't BUGGED? That's damn poor planning.
I guess that they were provisorely held in sleeping cell, not generally used for holding prisoners.
It's a missile silo/construction facility. They likely didn't HAVE holding cells in it.
it is 1969 in the clip so the bugging tech available is limited
I suspect that they did indeed have the room bugged. They must have thought that they were talking purely in code, or just saying weird stuff to mess with them. "Ahh, they say apophis. Could that be code for democracy?"
Hiding their badges in their pockets, too.
I love Daniel :D Niet :D
That's what parents mean when they say you are too clever for your own good. :]
@JRPGFan20000 Ah, SG-1, where the aliens all speak English but the Russians speak Russian.
@JRPGFan20000 ironic for someone who travels to other worlds and visits different cultures regularly.
I always wondered if the "Garage Door Opener" was an in-universe term or fan-based. Carter says "our GDOs" at 1:25 so that settles it
Pretty sure Jack coined that term on screen at one point.
Gate door opener
I love how this is so early in the series that they are still all pronouncing "Goa'uld" differently
That remained true for pretty much the entire series. I think Hammond always called them "goulds".
goold, gua oold, ga oold, goa uld
Yeah they never did get everybody saying it the same way
@@KnightRaymundit was based around character. O'Neill has a hatred of them that's portrayed like they make his skin crawl & so the way he says it is tinged with racism. Sam, Daniel & Hammond have a less extreme version that's kinda like the real, Teal'c & Tok'ra always pronounce them correctly
Hammond is all over the fucking place trying to pronouce shit.
One of the quirks that really makes this show so great.
You a Soviet spy?
Nyet! What makes you say that, comrade?
A real Soviet spy wouldn't answer in Russian... XD
Dah commerade.....wait i mean nyet. Nyet!!!! Ohhhohohho *cries into arms*
Being knowledgeable in foreign languages automatic response in the language you are being addressed in is for most automatic. When engaged in dialogue with two people using different languages which you are fluent in you develop the ability on a subconscious level to be able switch back and forth between them. This is why translators of certain languages are in high demand. French was once the main language of diplomats even though other languages where in far greater use. As once Greek and Latin were. In many languages there are different dialects such as Chinese being able to master all of them is a real feat. Even in English Americanese is different from British English as is Australian English. Words or slangs very greatly in meaning and use.
@@PerfectAlibi1 That's a waste of perfectly valid reverse psichology explanation. However, I am not sure the cowboys are aware of the very existance of reverse psichology...
@@gordonwiessner6327 I speak Russian. I’d be surprised as hell that this American soldier randomly spoke to me in Russia.
Grandfather Paradox plus Butterfly Effect. That's a headache in any language!
except we now know that time is a one way river, any change you make in the past does not alter our present, rather it creates a multiversal timeline from the point of origin, the flow of time cannot be interrupted, only diverted.
@@chloekaftan You're basing this of that marvel movie, aren't you?
Nope BTTF part. 2
In a reality where the multiverse exists, any attempt to change the past would create a new timeline.
Somewhere, some time, Captain Janeway's getting a migraine.
i miss soo much this serie !!!
Good video but it cuts off just before the best part as Jack walks out & says "no" in Russian IMO. LOL
Are you a Russian Spy? Нет Товарищ
the problem with time travel is that if it is within the same timeline, there never was a grandfather paradox, you didn't kill your own grandfather in the past so you can't go back in time to do it, as it never happened.
Yeah, the paradox is moot, because if you do travel back into the past, said past becomes your present, because you are there. Therefore killing your grandfather would have zero effect on you, because you already exist as you in that timeframe. If you do not kill your parents and stay there, you will end up witnessing the birth of a person you would consider being you, but it is just another person.
@@Phrew there are several different ideas on how affecting your own past might work, in regards to time travel. the difference between them is basically in your own actual timeline or you create a new splinter timeline that is now different from your own, as you were never in your own past when you experienced it the first time around.
@@johng.1703 Only in Tv shows and movies. If there was ever a real situation involving time travel, experts would treat it like how @Andeas Kist describes it.
"Time is an arrow", "Time is a river", "Time is a snowball", pick your narrative metaphor. Because (as far as we know) time travel to the past is impossible so temporal paradoxes are just theory without application. The Grandfather Paradox is (as far as we know) a thought experiment more in the realm of logic and philosophy than of science and physics.
You first have to define Time Travel.. As you can theoretically view the past...You just can't interact with it...Einstein Theory shows that is possible... But for someone to travel back in time. Opens up Pandora box.. As how can you travel back in time. If you changed time...And never existed? And if you never existed. How can you travel back in time...
And who is to say it has not already happened...
0:42 wasn't history changed millions of years ago when a team on Atlantis went back in time which in their timeline they all have died. Then a new timeline was created when a antlantian scientist knew of their coming provided some ZPMs to prevent them from dying like on the original timeline.
Also there's a boot strap paradox going on in the timeline as sg1 learn on abydos that there was a rebellion on earth 5,000 years ago, and when they went back in time to steal the zpm from ra, because they knew the rebellion already happened in their past, they ended up causing the rebellion to happen in their future
Wait, where is this storyline? Comic, movie, book?
In the stargate movie they learn there was a rebellion on earth 5,000 years ago, and in the season 8 2 part finale they go back in time to steal a zpm off ra, and because they know that the rebellion happen they end up causing the rebellion 5,000 years ago, it's season 8 moebius part 1 and 2
IIRC they used a different method of time travel, so it stands to reason that the rules could be different.
Janus, yeah. He's the one who created the Time Jumper seen in both Atlantis and SG1 and which features prominently in several of the SG1 books.
-Vi sovietskie shpioni?
Yes real smart to answer him in russian.
Anyway which episode?
Episode 1969, real smart to ask a question that's been answered by the name of the video.
S02E21 smartass (y)
It's from the made-for-tv movie Stargate: Continuum
martijn van weele Nope, its from the episode '1969'
I thought the very same thing. He asked, "Are you soviet spies?". The correct answer would be "No, we aren't." To say, "Nyet." just raises suspicion.
Kelly Rayburn actualy that would have the same effect, the correct answer is I don't understand what your saying
The interview took place when SG1 traveled back to 1969.
Star Trek had been on television from September, 1966 to June, 1969. There was good reason that the interviewer was aware of Captain James T. Kirk.
A Blooper????
Maybe he wasn't a Trekker.
1:14 Casual as.
If someone asks you if you're a Soviet spy, you don't say NIET! 😂
1969 *is* the name if the episode. It's from Season 2.
Sam: You'll back to being Apophis' first prime.
Teal'c: Nah fuck that shit.
I love how Carter is have this conversation inside the cell like security inside the base aren't listening to everything that's being said, they are probably video recording it as well. Hell, Carter and company already know that they were being video recorded inside the missle silo, yet she has this tell all conversation anyway.
back then there were no tiny cameras or microphones like today
Plus the facility wasn't really built with holding and interrogating prisoners in mind, mostly IF someone made it that far into the base (and they had no idea how the SG team made it that far into their base) they'd just stuff them into a convenient room until they could be transported to the real interrogators
You have to make some concessions in order to have a television show. Yes the guard outside the door would probably have heard something and yes they could have bugged the cell, but it would be a bad scene to have everyone sit there and say nothing.
Apparently, there was more helium in the atmosphere in 1969.
Everyone had high pitched voices just like I did at the the time this aired. 😂🤣
They speed up the show so they have more room for commercials.
"well he's asking if we're Russian spies, I'm just answering him" IN RUSSIAN
You know she's accepting just one *theoretical* consequence of time travel as if its a fact. Last time I checked when it comes to time travel there are at least half a dozen possible side effects of it occurring. Like the Multiverse theory where by time traveling your creating a entirely different universe or its possible that this is a single timeline theory like we see in Harry Potter.
Whether the time travel theory she explained is real or not is not the point, but to not risk it being real
@@MybeautifulandamazingPrincess Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@Ragitsu I agree, he should be familiar with the topic since he's supposedly got a doctorate, this is also a physics topic though, so Carter would be familiar with it too
The math for time travel works, but only if you never "cross your tail." That is, no particle which time travels can ever occupy its own space-time frame twice. This means nothing you do in one space-time frame affects any other space-time frame. Each frame is its own reality, essentially, and you can only revisit it once.
Places like where they are, are usually bugged. What if that conversation was recorded?
Bug in 1969? Even there were silicon based partial conductors back in these days, it was still an early stage and such transmitter would be quite large and pretty noisy, giving out that it is actually listening (unless that they hid it somewhere else and ran wires to microphone hidden behind a wall). FM transmission wasn't invented yet and AM trasmission would be extremely power consuming for just listening to a conversation. They might have it wired, just a microphone from behind a wall running through wires directly into output, but transmission microphones were quite large back then and they would need to cut some holes to the wall where the microphone is placed in order to capture a clean conversation, therefore giving out the location of the mike, which isn't particularily convenient. The room would need to be dark and the mike would need to be hidden in even darker area. Sure, some bugs (wired) did exist back then, but the fact that the facility was primarily testing missiles and it wasn't designed for holding prisoners for interrogating, clearly discards this idea. But I see your point here.
@@CZghost Wrong. FM technology was invented in 1933 by American engineer Edwin Armstrong.
@@VideoAmateurLuxembourg Still, that facility wasn't used to hold prisoners for interrogating, it was used for testing missiles. What point would have a bug in a facility where no tresspasser could ever cross their feet?
It's more likely that it's crew quarters
Always cracks me up.
How did the guards miss that huge patch in her pocket?
Shouldn't they have come out of the Stargate in the storehouse where it was stored at the time, before Catherine Langford reactivated the program?
I assume they changed this whole "stargate was there and then vanished" for later episodes and movies.
Daniel.
1:01 Teal'c: idgaf
Someone forgot about multiverse theory. :D
This was their first time travel experience so they were freaking out at the repercussions. I know I would.
GOD DAMNIT DANIEL
Seems going ftl too close to a gravity well always throws you back in time. Superman, Star Trek IV, SG1...
Pretty sure that O'Neill's father would be older than 50 at the point he goes back from. But the point is true.
Yep. In fact, Richard Dean Anderson was 49 years old when this episode was shot, and his father, Stuart Jay Anderson, was 75.
Well. I am just thinking how did Teal'c's interrogation went.
My tenses are messed up
Teal'c probably interrogated the interrogator by giving him that terrifying look he previously used to get confessions
What advanced weapons is she talking about?
They had Zats, and I'm sure this early in the series Teal'c was still using his staff weapon.
@@Capt_Dango
Thanks, I forgot they've been using that on their missions.
They also probably had modern guns, which while we don't think about as being advanced, would still have been 30 years ahead of anything available. If not overly more advanced, then at least seeming to be from an unknown(/secret?) manufacturer and deserving of further investigation
The zats mainly. And their own guns are more advanced than what would be available in that time period.
P90's, which are 20 years ahead of production...and 30 years ahead of civillian version
I just moved it to my house ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤,,💯👽🕳️
Whis tried to tell bulma about time travel
There's nothing wrong with just observing history as long as one obeys the temporal accords. Oh, wait that's Star Trek ENT. LOL! Small joke. A man named Daniels(no pun intended) gave himself a Starfleet enlisted rank and served on a twenty-second century Starfleet vessel under Jon Archer's command. The time traveling operative was from the 30th or 31st century.
don't bring up that piece of shit series
@@firstname4337 fuck you
Both are good shows to be fair.
Jonathan Archer= Jonathan 'Jack' O'Neill?
I forget. From which episode is this?
It's in the title. The episode is "1969".
Department of Temporal Investigations will be showing up
Dang but Carter was pretty.
☮
0:42
8 seasons and a movie later they would cheat even that.
0:49 thats not even the problem, given we're just assuming thats how time works for some reason. the problem is if we change the past, we're no longer *us*
In the last season, Carter suggest they go back in time to get a ZPM
Bill c that was Daniel.
@@CD-Freedom Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@Ragitsu Daniel has always been more interested in the exploration and adventure aspects of time travel. While Sam has been more fearful of disrupting the timeline.
Or they will create multiple parallel realities. Which is fine. And nothing happens to them specifically. 🤔
What if you become your own grandfather?
Or better in Carter's case, your own grandmother! (meaning she'd needed to stay in that time for 9 months and give birth!) XD
... You are fan of Futurama, aren't you? XD
@@saranemcova5448
What gave it away? ^^
@@PerfectAlibi1 Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
Nice chipmunk voices lol. When she said First Prime of Apophis Teal'c sort of seemed to reconsider it in his mind as "Hmm maybe it was not such a bad gig afterall". BTW Apophis might wave on by in 2068
As though they wouldn’t have had someone listening in the whole time.
$539.50 .... with interest lol
They talk about the grandfather paradox in a universe where the multiverse is confirmed to exist. Any attempt to change their past would just create an alternate timeline.
That's what happened in the Stargate SG1 Apocalypse trilogy: SG1 gets thrown about a hundred years into the future during season 3. As a result since this was right before O'Neill's mission to expose the rogue NID off-world operation, Earth gets removed from the Protected Planets Treaty and falls to the Goa'uld. A Wraith faction arrives about 40 years later due to discovering Atlantis after it rose to the surface when it ran out of power and used a worshipper with the gene to fly it to Earth. During the books, SG1 teams up with both a smaller Wraith faction that wants to return to Pegasus and the Goa'uld System Lord Hecate who is using Janet Fraiser as her host in order to free the planet. They also have to deal with a plot to create Goa'uld-Wraith Hybrids. During the last book, O'Neill and Carter find the Time Jumper on Atlantis and use it to go back in time and prevent their past selves from ever getting trapped in the future in the first place. While they succeed, its basically an Avengers Endgame type scenario: changing the past doesn't alter their own future and instead creates a split-off alternate timeline. So they return to the future having learned that Hecate was actually behind them getting trapped there in the first place. They help the friendlier Wraith faction take control of Atlantis and defeat Hecate. A year later, Earth is rebuilding and O'Neill uses Atlantis to return the Wraith to Pegasus.
@Axl Dave Yeah I just consider it a goof
@@WarGrowlmon18 Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
@@Ragitsu Why would he understand that beyond what he might've seen in movies like Back to the Future??? Carter would know better.
@@WarGrowlmon18 If you're well versed in history, you *know* how even small events can shape history. Daniel ought to be aware of this.
How can such smart people, think about changing the past to get rid of bad things, and not consider that changing the past, involves changing the future they are a part of.... I mean come on. What. They didn’t have back to the future in this universe?
Daniel *should* know better. Remember that characters are sometimes made to say things for the audience's benefit.
I see
Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
"Grandfather paradox" is only valid if the grandfather *has not already had children!* I and my brother are are an example of this. Our grandfather died before our parents were even married. However, obviously my grandfather had a son before he died which is why I'm on RUclips writing comments today (instead of doing other things that need to be done.) ::smile::
Shouldn't Daniel Jackson - Doctor of Archaeology *and* student of history - be the one explaining about the Grandfather Paradox and the dangers of altering history?
O'Neill is around 40 years old. If he went back 50 years and killed his Grandfather, his father would already have been born.
@@WillCamx That's exactly my point.
Coincidentally, I was reading an article the other night entitled "Time Travel for Beginners" by Dr. John Gribbin in the Stargate anthology "Stepping Through the Stargate: Science, Archeology and the Military in Stargate SG-1" (excellent anthology, especially for science nerds like me) where Dr. Gribbin actually explains how time travel may actually work using wormholes and, to a certain extent, the mechanism that Kip Thorne and others used to come up with a theoretical way of actually doing it. As my ex pointed out, however, we may have had the equations for time travel back in the 18th Century, but we still don't have the *technology* to do it. Anyhow... I digress.
@@kalinystazvoruna8702 These are the possible ways I see time travel playing out
1 Any thing you do in the past has already happened since you were there in the past.
or
2 Anything you do in the past creates a new time line and an alternate reality which you are now living in instead of you original reality.
@@WillCamx Yes. That's exactly what Seth (from the new age Seth books "channeled" by Jane Roberts) back in the 1970s said. Apparently, every time you make a choice you shift into a an alternate probability (an alternate Reality would have the fundamental laws of physics being changed; e.g. the spin, electric charge, etc. of fundamental particles would be slightly different). I've actually experienced this back in the 1980s, and was rather shocked about the whole thing! Now if I can only shift probabilities so I win at the lottery for more than $40!😸
LOL " Het"
Carter sounds different.
So Carter and they all happily chat loudly in a top secret facility that likely is bugged up the wazoo with cameras even maybe behind mirrors or walls etc. I thought this was absolutely stupid on Carters part.
Good luck...
Odd. Jack seems to get the paradox issue and Jackson seemed to know nothing about it. Maybe they already changed history and jackson got dumb. Heheheh.
But what if bootstrap paradox is real, you could kill your own grandfather and still remain existing :P
Let's say you time travel to prevent ww2.
Then you end up ww2 later but with nuclear weapons.
Which should make you realize that ww2 happening when it did is actually a good thing.
And then you wonder if WW1 was caused by some other time traveller to fix your blunder that caused WW2 to happen with nukes...
Kind of screwy.....but it makes sense,LOL!!
It's Lisa Simpson!
its sound some little wrong
-Ві советьскіе шпіоні,
-ньєт
It is. They kinda overdoing "soft" sounds.
However, it is still one of the best language spellings that I remember from any TV-serial that is not Russian.
Вы советские шпионы?
Нет
Дэниэл?
Seriousely, Carter, I thought you were smart.
If you were to go back in time and try to kill your grandfather, there's two possibilities: either timetravel works on multiverse theory, or it doesn't. If it does, then you kill your grandfather and create a branching timeline in which your grandfather was killed, but your present remains unaffected. If it does not, then due to the fact that you must exist to travel back in time and kill your grandfather, established events dictate that you will not succeed in killing your grandfather and may even be the reason he was alive to conceive your father in the first place. The situation where you erase yourself like in Back To The Future, or come back to a changed present simply cannot manifest, and simply by being in the past, or rather, having been in the past, which equates to the same thing (being having been in the past, I believe, if you want to be having been will getting all technical with verb tenses when time travel is involved), you will have already been part of the history you came from, and as such, you cannot change anything, because anything you do/did already contributed to the present you came from. Either that, or you create a branching timeline and the present is still unaffected. Though I want to note that I think this latter option is less likely because it requires for there to have been a "time" (for lack of a better term) when you did not yet travel to that point in history, meaning that time must exist in some sort of lateral dimension as well, a time outside of time, if you will, in which the timeline of timetravel is stored. Ockham's razor prefers my former explanation.
Time travel. No continuity risks involved.
Except in Stargate, continuity do gets affected when things are change in the past...
Its funny actually that I read while ago about what time travel in Terminator franchise means....and the most popular theory definitely seems to be branching/alternative timeline, where each movie is actually set on its own seperate timeline, cause each time the history is changed, atleast somewhat.
So even in the original movie, its not the "original" timeline cause in the original timeline ofc no-one was sent back in time and Jugdement Day happened in in 1997 and its even said that Terminator 2 and 3 are all on seperate timelines as well.
Either way its quite suprising actually that from what I've read from actual scientific articles time-travel back in time mightactually be possible in theory, but ONLY to the point where this time-travel machine was started the first time and you stepped into it, thus it would also eliminate the possibility what is many times played in time-travel stories where two versions of you, the past and the present could exist at the same time, let alone the grandfather theory.
Not necessarily. Remember, that’s only theory, not fact.
Martihn van weele, I always love to see that others understand the finer points of theoretical time travel.
Balnazzardi
Interesting, since as I recall, in the first movie Reese specifies to Sarah that he's from "one possible future" before mentioning how he doesn't know the technical complexities, and the message from John is all about how the future isn't set in stone.
If they went back in time Trump may never have never been elected President.
We ARE in the fucked up timeline. Isn't that obvious?
Even better they might have prevented Clinton or Obama from being elected. That would have been a real benefit to humanity.
the democrats would just open the doors for the goa'uld lol
Why would you talk freely in a secret facility's lock up ? Didn't they think the room was bugged ?
Nyet ! Daniel wtf