Mazda 3 e-SkyActiv-G 150 acceleration | 0-100, 1/4 mile & more | 2023 | sedan | FWD | GPS results
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- Please consider subscribing: / @acceleratingcars
2023 Mazda 3 e-SkyActiv-G 150
2L 4-cyl N/A petrol engine + MHEV
150 hp & 213 Nm
6-speed automatic
FWD
17-inch wheels on winter tires
weight: ~1.370 kg
claimed 0-100: 9.5 sec
- best tested 0-100: 8.91 sec
- best tested 1/4 mile: 16.64 sec @ 136.94 km/h
00:01 pass/fly by's
00:25 engine start & revs
00:42 launch & car stats
01:04 60-100 km/h
01:26 80-120 km/h
01:49 100-150 km/h
02:23 0-100 km/h (x2)
03:06 1/4 mile run
03:40 speedo vs GPS
03:49 results sheet
Nice results. The car is realtively light according to the nowdays standards. That is why the acceleration on the speeds below 130 km/h are better than I expected. It could be even better if the gearbox was shorter: it almost gets 100 km/h on the second gear and for 1/4 mile only 3 gears of 6 were used.
Agreed with pretty much everything. It also grips pretty well from standstill, wheelspin is not much of a problem. But then again, the power level isn't that big and with FWD cars i always perform 0-100 and 1/4 mile at the end so that the tires are a bit warmer.
Is there a big difference compared with 2.5 Skyactiv X?
@@dragospahontu i haven't tested a 2.5 Skyactiv X, but Skyactiv G (in the Mazda 6 sedan). I have tested 2 Skyactiv X models of Maxda CX30, but that was a 2L engine with 150 and 186hp. For these 2 versions, the 186hp variant was somewhat faster, but not impressive. I personally would never go for the 150hp.
Cum ti se pare ca viteza masina? O consideri suficienta pentru niste depasiri okay pentru romania?
Am inteles ca g122 e lenesa rau
Salut! Mersi pentru comentariu. Despre performanta masinii ce sa zic... Este ok/buna, atata timp cat nu ai pretentii de sportivitate (ca viteza/acceleratie, deoarece ca manevrabilitate este destul de agila). Intrucat consider varianta asta de 150 cp doar ok/satisfacatoare, cred ca cea de 122 cp ar fi, totusi, cam prea slaba.
@@AcceleratingCarsmultumesc frumos pentru raspuns!
@Bizyze i have mazda 3 hatch with 150ps, believe me, its as fast as Audi A4 150ps, maybe even faster. You won't need more power and speed for all normal driving situations, and at times a bit of fun.
Daca e sa ne uitam la timpi relevanti, 80 - 120, cam aici faci depasirile pe DN-uri si 100-150 autostrada, nu sta chiar atat de rau, poti merge pe Skyactiv X, este un pic mai fasneata.
Pacat ca nu e varianta E-skyactiv-X de 186 cai, chiar sunt curios ce performante ar scoate aceea.
Salut! La firma de rent de unde mai iau masini e anuntat un SkyActiv-X, cred ca pe un CX30. Daca si cand apare o sa-l testez 😉
@@AcceleratingCars Si eu sunt curios de un SkyActiv - X, chiar si pe un CX-30.
@@pauldaniel100 era anuntata in portofoliul firmei de rent, dar nu am mai auzit nimic de ea. Cum apare la ei, o sa apara si aici 😉
@@AcceleratingCars acum vad ca scot motoare de 2.5l e-skyactiv g de 140 cai si x de 186. teoretic ar trebui sa aibe putin mai mult cuplu
How much RPM at 110 and 130 kmh at 6. gear ?
Honestly i did not test for this. What is clear from rewatching the video is that the car is in 4th gear @ 4.5k rpm at 140 km/h and what i think is 5th gear @ 2k rpm doing 100 km/h. I'm sure that if you search for the gear ratios online you might be able to work out the values for 6th gear.
my 3 G122 manual is at 2.300 rpm at 110, 2.700 rpm at 130.
automatic should have slightly shorter gears, so probably a little bit higher rpms
My manual does 0-100 in 8.5s
It may be. Your car is probably a bit lighter than this one and maybe you were on summer tires?
@AcceleratingCars Hatch amd Sedan both have identical weight. I tested it on all season tyres, but it isn't any slower than on summer tyres. Actually, hatch is around 30kg heavier.
@@ampm9771 Why would a hatch be heavier than a sedan? And i was thinking that your model could be lighter than the one i tested because cars with automatics are usually 30-50 kg heavier than the same model but with manual.
@AcceleratingCars It is heavier, because the chassis at the rear is much larger and stiffer. Just look how much more metal is used in c-pillar also the hatch is much heavier than Sedan's boot. You can also check the data sheet from Mazda. It says it is 30-40kg heavier.
But you are right, AT box is approx. 30kg heavier. But like for like, hatch is heavier.
@@AcceleratingCarsauto gearbox powrr loos is much bigher then manjal. Its over 20%
17-inch wheels ? I think it's 18.
You are right! These are 18-inch. My bad!