"I think, therefore I am". So many people have misunderstood this sentence, but so many had it right... Thank you Master, I would've loved to live in your time and ask you questions...
A thinker is simply a person and is more than a thought itself. A person who's sleeping is not thinking at all but a person still exists. A person uses mind to think is one primary function of our mind/brain.
It is quite the other way round when I identify myself with the anger, I get angry. But when I realise that I am only a witness of the anger, the anger looses its grip on me, I witness the rise and fall of the anger. Both the anger and the entity which I call as myself are thoughts in the field of consciousness. Consciousness is the only reality, consciousness is the real witness.
Those little boys are totally mental, guided by Aristotle and followers: he and his alumni could not find the truth, so they decided to debate infinitely about it. Consequence - when debates never finish- the best theoretical idea is unanimously accepted - a new religion is born, and we have this blind society at present. Thanks for the video.
It's so simple, just really ask yourself why do you talk to yourself? Who is agreeing and who is disagreeing? And why? Don't argue it, don't rationalize it ...just admit it's mental to have conversations with yourself. Now why are you doing that, where did it come from? See for yourself you were taught to think. You went to school and learned how to think. Why? See it for yourself don't be told what to think. Realize you don't think for yourself. Why?
Yes, a difficult question. It isn’t apparently obvious to most that the thinker is thought. Most of us live on an autopilot mode as it pertains to the functioning of thought. I would have to say that fear is the cause for the continuous wearing of the brain as to reflect so much. To be present in the face of fear. That one won’t sink, they will swim. That is the challenge.
Because we each believe we are wholly separate from everyone (and everything) else and since we become conditioned during childhood to believe that the pain and suffering others cause us is their doing and, thus, their fault, many of us are unable (and unwilling) to see how the reality we perceive is the reality we alone have manifested. In JK's example of violence: "I am violent because others did this or that to me (in the past) and I am still angry/resentful about it." In other words, I have absolved myself from any and all responsibility in becoming violent. The same could be said about our thoughts: "the thoughts I think are not my thoughts (are not "me") but, rather, simply reflective of all my conditioning, experiences, and relationships with others."
Isn't that we don't accept de fact of ourselves, of our anger, etc. because we don't want to be responsable for ourselves and so we blame others or the enviroment for our condition and innward conflict?
It may be that the mind can not exist without duality. If we eliminate thought, then million year of old thinking pattern is broken. We are out of the stream. It may be a situation that only the brain emerges, eliminating duality. It may be the status of Buddha mind.
The last audience member has a point. Why is there duality? Because that's necessary for reason to function. We use words and words live in duality. A concept is this and not that. There is duality because we're here to talk about it. It's the same pattern as in the question "why does the universe have the exact perfect cosmological constants for our apparition ? - Because we appeared in it, so it couldn't be otherwise. If we stop thinking and talking, if we keep quiet, we have a chance to directly experience non duality. But not if we continue these debates. A speaking JK is always frustrated. A silent JK must be very blissful. But he's never filmed this way. JK in a debate is like a reminder of the frustration we want to hide too quickly in order to accept complacent conclusions and be done with it. He is a constant reminder of the pointlessness of his own debates. Why does he engage wholeheartedly? Because that's how to reach us. What he says is truthful. But he'll not end the debate himself. The conclusion is not in the text but in the meta text, i.e. in our experience. The video ends abrutptly and leaves us waiting for the answer. But I suspect the following is just more frustration. He's not going to tell us "keep quiet". He's going to tell us: "you want to debate? Ok let's debate, but let's be rigorous", until we're fed up trying, so we turn the switch without him telling us. It must come from us.
In the End -- Fact is i am voilent Why has the mind created the non fact -- which is non violent Is it because it seeks security. Or Is it because fear of the unknown He was about to make us enquire but the vedio got ended. Please when can we find the full vedio
a step by step description can describe anything with great art. yet the description 🖼️ has nothing new to reveal for the description and the describe is not that which is revealed when it stops describing. what is revealed is the fact that theres no description to describe that which has no space for descriptions other than truth of that it remains assuming’ to know’ or be aware’ of. assumption and facts, are not the same = yet, both are equally 🟰 important to get to the truth of those assumptions based on facts fact is descriptions and assumptions are anchor ⚓️ to some and life support 🛟 to others. however, both not in’ fact with order. fact is when both assumption and descriptions completely end there is an order. ( again the description is not that’ however if one may put it into words and emotions,… its sorta like that Tetris game if the pieces aren’t in order the game is chaotic/stressful. however, when the pieces start to be sorted out and put into the right place the 🖼️ of game becomes easier to look at. therefore when the things are put in their proper place, the game becomes easier. And then that feeling that changes that feeling of stress anxiety of the pieces stacking up changes to a more simple, less stress and less chaotic. the game then transforms to that beautiful feeling of placing those long l - shape pieces and watching the whole screen cleared and disappearing that’ is beautiful hehehe anyway… Why is the description there? and why does the description who understands the describe is simply now an assumption that cannot be there if it remains describing that which is now, was and will remains?
Why has the mind created the non-fact? Because it was educated like this: comparison, ideals etc. It must stopp talking like labeling things. Thought must stopp, so that the brain becomes quiet and has space and energy to observe ONLY.
The brain creates the non-fact because it wants security and and it aims to remain with the life that it knows already. When the mind sees the fact and doesn't like it, then it puts a frame around the fact in order to deliver a feeling of security or at least of a known situation, which feels safe again. Apart from the desire for security, the brain needs less energy when it works in a field that it already knows. Living from moment to moment with real facts requires enormous energy.
"I think, therefore I am". So many people have misunderstood this sentence, but so many had it right...
Thank you Master, I would've loved to live in your time and ask you questions...
If you don’t think, are you?
@@dpakholly believe the thinker always thinks so when a/the thought is needed it can be had, no?
A thinker is simply a person and is more than a thought itself. A person who's sleeping is not thinking at all but a person still exists. A person uses mind to think is one primary function of our mind/brain.
It is quite the other way round when I identify myself with the anger, I get angry. But when I realise that I am only a witness of the anger, the anger looses its grip on me, I witness the rise and fall of the anger.
Both the anger and the entity which I call as myself are thoughts in the field of consciousness. Consciousness is the only reality, consciousness is the real witness.
J understands & speaks french also!!
I didnt know that
He also knew two or three other European languages
Keep Uploading!!
Thank you for your support
Those little boys are totally mental, guided by Aristotle and followers: he and his alumni could not find the truth, so they decided to debate infinitely about it. Consequence - when debates never finish- the best theoretical idea is unanimously accepted - a new religion is born, and we have this blind society at present. Thanks for the video.
Thank you ❤❤
It's so simple, just really ask yourself why do you talk to yourself? Who is agreeing and who is disagreeing? And why? Don't argue it, don't rationalize it ...just admit it's mental to have conversations with yourself. Now why are you doing that, where did it come from? See for yourself you were taught to think. You went to school and learned how to think. Why? See it for yourself don't be told what to think. Realize you don't think for yourself. Why?
I do talk to myself but don't know why thankyou made me realise take care
Thanks
Thank you for your generosity
Thinker is the thought 🙏🙏❤️
There is duality because we have to conform to that society.
Yes, a difficult question. It isn’t apparently obvious to most that the thinker is thought. Most of us live on an autopilot mode as it pertains to the functioning of thought.
I would have to say that fear is the cause for the continuous wearing of the brain as to reflect so much.
To be present in the face of fear. That one won’t sink, they will swim. That is the challenge.
because the happening is not in space and time,and human have two mind , emotional and rational mind
Because we each believe we are wholly separate from everyone (and everything) else and since we become conditioned during childhood to believe that the pain and suffering others cause us is their doing and, thus, their fault, many of us are unable (and unwilling) to see how the reality we perceive is the reality we alone have manifested. In JK's example of violence: "I am violent because others did this or that to me (in the past) and I am still angry/resentful about it." In other words, I have absolved myself from any and all responsibility in becoming violent. The same could be said about our thoughts: "the thoughts I think are not my thoughts (are not "me") but, rather, simply reflective of all my conditioning, experiences, and relationships with others."
❤❤❤
Isn't that we don't accept de fact of ourselves, of our anger, etc. because we don't want to be responsable for ourselves and so we blame others or the enviroment for our condition and innward conflict?
🧡🌻
1:45 the trained is the trainer …
Please upload the Full video or link
Pls upload the full video
ruclips.net/video/qmV4f95ggL4/видео.html
Why can't you upload complete video? Guys?
Then who will tell me the answer 'Why'?
Edit- (Where can I find the full video?) Such a beautiful video.
The full video plz?
plz upload the full video
Link is in the description of the video !
Description check kro full video ka link diya hua hai 👀
Full link talk is in the description
It is in the discription of this video my friend, go check it out it has a lot of wisdom.
It's in the description
It may be that the mind can not exist without duality. If we eliminate thought, then million year of old thinking pattern is broken. We are out of the stream. It may be a situation that only the brain emerges, eliminating duality. It may be the status of Buddha mind.
Full lecture
Check video description
atleast give the link of the full video in description , when we start understanding the topic , video ends , not good plzz give link to full video
Why is there no conclusion at the end of the video. All the preparations are there to say it
Only half 😢
The last audience member has a point. Why is there duality? Because that's necessary for reason to function. We use words and words live in duality. A concept is this and not that.
There is duality because we're here to talk about it. It's the same pattern as in the question "why does the universe have the exact perfect cosmological constants for our apparition ? - Because we appeared in it, so it couldn't be otherwise.
If we stop thinking and talking, if we keep quiet, we have a chance to directly experience non duality. But not if we continue these debates. A speaking JK is always frustrated. A silent JK must be very blissful. But he's never filmed this way. JK in a debate is like a reminder of the frustration we want to hide too quickly in order to accept complacent conclusions and be done with it. He is a constant reminder of the pointlessness of his own debates. Why does he engage wholeheartedly? Because that's how to reach us. What he says is truthful. But he'll not end the debate himself. The conclusion is not in the text but in the meta text, i.e. in our experience.
The video ends abrutptly and leaves us waiting for the answer. But I suspect the following is just more frustration. He's not going to tell us "keep quiet". He's going to tell us: "you want to debate? Ok let's debate, but let's be rigorous", until we're fed up trying, so we turn the switch without him telling us. It must come from us.
In the End -- Fact is i am voilent Why has the mind created the non fact -- which is non violent
Is it because it seeks security.
Or
Is it because fear of the unknown
He was about to make us enquire but the vedio got ended. Please when can we find the full vedio
this differs from what ramana maharshi says about thoughts.. he says you are just the obsrever of your thoughts i guess
a step by step description can describe anything with great art.
yet the description 🖼️
has nothing new to reveal
for the description and the describe is not that which is revealed when it stops describing.
what is revealed is the fact
that theres no description to describe that which has no space for descriptions other than truth of that
it remains assuming’ to know’ or be aware’ of.
assumption and facts,
are not the same =
yet,
both are equally 🟰 important
to get to the truth of those
assumptions based on facts
fact is descriptions and assumptions are anchor ⚓️ to some
and life support 🛟 to others.
however, both not in’ fact with order.
fact is when both assumption and descriptions completely end
there is an order.
( again the description is not that’
however if one may put it into words and emotions,…
its sorta like that Tetris game
if the pieces aren’t in order the game is chaotic/stressful.
however,
when the pieces start to be sorted out and put into the right place
the 🖼️ of game becomes easier to look at.
therefore when the things are put in their proper place,
the game becomes easier.
And then that feeling that changes
that feeling of stress anxiety of the pieces stacking up changes
to a more simple, less stress and less chaotic.
the game then transforms to that beautiful feeling of placing those long l - shape pieces and
watching the whole screen cleared
and disappearing that’ is beautiful
hehehe anyway…
Why is the description there?
and why does the description
who understands the describe is simply now an assumption
that cannot be there if it remains describing that which is now, was and will remains?
Why has the mind created the non-fact?
Because it was educated like this: comparison, ideals etc. It must stopp talking like labeling things. Thought must stopp, so that the brain becomes quiet and has space and energy to observe ONLY.
The brain creates the non-fact because it wants security and and it aims to remain with the life that it knows already.
When the mind sees the fact and doesn't like it, then it puts a frame around the fact in order to deliver a feeling of security or at least of a known situation, which feels safe again.
Apart from the desire for security, the brain needs less energy when it works in a field that it already knows. Living from moment to moment with real facts requires enormous energy.
Damn Jiddhu I didn't know you were on youtube. Wait you are alive??