Myth Of The Canadian Assault Rifle - The Truth About Canada's Firearms 'Buyback'
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июн 2024
- A six-minute video exploring what the Canadian 'Buyback' of so-called 'Military-Style Assault Rifles' actually is, and how it works. As of 2024/06/09 the Canadian Federal government has spent $42,000,000 without taking possession of a single firearm.
Хобби
What your government has done to gun sports is depressing.
It's never enough for those in power wanting to disarm you.
This is especially true amongst competitive shooting. 3-gun is gone, most pistol leagues are either gone or in their way out, cowboy action is disappearing. It's pretty hard to compete when all the sporting goods are prohibited or sales are frozen.
We aren’t disarmed. Also this video has misinformation from the get-go.
There’s been plenty of homicides with AR-15 platform rifles in Canada…From the two Islamic Extremists who shot a police officer a few years back, to the Nova Scotia shooter.
It’s tragic what’s happening here but what’s even more tragic is the gun community here that’s willing to embellish and lie, thinking that won’t get more guns taken from us.
Well articulated!
Thank you very much.
Being from the Czech Republic, I'm really offended that the Vz. 58 is the cheapest item on the list.
If it's any consolation I'm a vz58 owner myself.
It's one of the best rifles
Aren't you called Checkia now? Vz58 7.5 in barrel in 7.62x39 with a battle brake that things a flashbang dispenser
@@CMp-bq1bj No. We ARE NOT called Checkia. Short name for our country is Czechia. 😉
@jannespor8178 Me speak Engrish I spell things how they sound my bad.
Well put! This whole scheme is a disgrace to Canadian traditions and cultures. We are law abiding, responsible owners. We have submitted to all types of controls to make sure that the people legally owning these firearms are responsible and not criminal, you don't have to take our word for it.
Thank you very much, I appreciate the feedback.
not really true. In Canada's history, guns have always been a work tool, for ranchers, farmers, hunters and trappers. After a while, some guns were used for hunting purposes for city folks. In the 1930s, the government of the day looked to the criminality happening in USA, did not want what was happening there, and went about constructing much of the gun laws we see today. Basically, guns were meant to be work tools, not pleasure tools.
Nowhere in Canada's history were guns treated as joy pieces, until very recently.
@rb239rtr That's a ridiculous statement.
First of all, a lot of Canadian towns and cities have always been a little rural, especially out west. Could not necessarily count on a quick law enforcement response. For you to claim that town folk did not have a need to own pistols and shotguns and rifles is just false.
Also you're making quite an assumption that no rancher or farmer ever bought, or owned guns in their collection, for pure enjoyment or pleasure/sport use.
But I think the biggest objection I have to your comment is that city folk don't have a long-standing culture of taking hunting trips and using fire arms as tools. And like any tool, if you want to be proficient in use you must practice. Hence, gun clubs and shooting ranges. This culture belongs to every Canadian.
Very good and clear narrative of the situation we have about firearms ownership in Canada,worth of subscribing.
Thank you very much, friend.
The buyback is in reality a swindle.
Swindle is too generous a term since it implies an element of cleverness or skill on the part of the swindler. This is a forced confiscation backed by the threat of violent arrest and seizure.
The trudeau regime is involved, so of course it's a swindle! Could you expect anyting else from these shysters?
Yeah, $1500 plus plus and they’ve appreciated in value! Notice how they want to tax our capital gains more than ever but they don’t want to pay for the same sort of investment returns that we earned on our guns?!
That's because everyone knows 'inflation is a myth'. Emperor Trudeau told us so.
yeah, also dont forget, they want as many guns for the war that no one has declared.. and as much money for the war no one has declared, and also tax the hell out of us to fund said war that no one has declared, a war that started in 2014, 10 years later still no declaration of war, but its here and very present, 200miles off Florida coast present...
@TATVCanada That's his righteous excellency, our lord and saviour Justin Messiah Trudeau, to you uneducated mortal. Get it right, or he'll have a life buyback as well and send you to an Alberta coal mine for $1500CAD
lll+lll Canadian brothers & sisters, do not comply lll+lll
Pretty good video, well supported and argued. That being said there is one key flaw in it. You use the term Assault Rifle, in the context of these recents bans, but all Assault Rifles were banned in the 1970s (I believe 1977).
The illegal and highly unconstitutional May 2020 OIC is targeting so called “assault weapons” or “assault-style” firearms, not the already banned Assault Rifles. Those 2 terms in quotations & not capitalized are written that way because they are invented terms not recognized internationally. However, Assault Rifle is capitalized & lacks quotations because that term is internationally recognized with a very specific definition/criteria, thus is a noun.
The compensation amount they'll pay for the confiscation will also be taxed, so it's not even what they say it is, it's always less.
Maybe if we work really hard and behave really well they'll let us keep a small piece of our money.
@@TATVCanada lol, maybe if we pet their reptilian scales, they'll let us eat bugs with them
PLEASE SHARE THIS AMAZING VIDEO WITH EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY
I paid $4,000 for my AR15 and did not shoot many rounds on it. 4 months later, it was on the banned list with a buy-back value less than $1,400. I can not even ship it out of Canada for my friend.
I feel your pain on that one. My comp gun cost less than that initially but I've spent a lot of time and money upgrading and customizing it. It's infuriating.
Give them the receiver it has the serial on it, nothing more.
@@tonyc223 And do what with the rest of the parts? If you have no lower, the rest is just expensive paper weights.
"You can just install the parts on other guns."- Sure, in some cases. Yet, some parts are firearms specific.
"You can sell the parts."- Usually for a huge loss, but how can you sell the parts inside Canada who can't use them either.
I'm not sure how giving up just the receiver will help anything.
It's the closest you'll ever get to giving them the finger.
THIS VIDEO IS THE GREATEST AND MOST PERFECTLY COMPREHENSIVE SHORT VIDEO-ON THE TRAVESTY OF CANADIAN FIREARMS REGULATIONS......(and wonderfully sarcastic 😊) AMAZING WORK HERE TATV!!!! THANK YOU!!
Thanks very much, I really appreciate the support. Good luck to you in the coming months and here's hoping the 2025 Canadian election brings us all some good news.
And mine are not for sale, btw if the stazi want to torch my gun vault should i tell them that the reloading powder is in there as well. Yepp not a peep.
And don’t forget that thin aluminum coffee can filled to the top with loose primers.
Well said.
Great video, buddy thank you
Glad you enjoyed it
It’s all about public safety they say… yeeeaaahhh…. You will own nothing and be happy!! You cant buy back something that you never owned!
It's weird how every time someone tells me something is for my own safety, it ends up costing me money, property or freedoms.
Anyone who is willing to give up freedom for safety deserve neither
Amen.
*Benjamin Franklin I believe. Those USA forefathers all had the best quotes.
Outstanding content. I'll add: When a burglar takes your TV, and leaves a few coins, it is STILL THEFT!
Amen to that.
Great video and excellent production quality. You earned the like my friend.
Thanks for the visit
Gov can pay for the shipping and taxes. They can’t take them unless you agree
They cannot buy-back something they never owned.
They can certainly take them, but it's still just theft with a prettier name.
They can try.@@TATVCanada
In the Australian 'buyback' stripping the firearm and then take all the pieces in one at the time and triple youre $$.
From what I heard today they are going to insist on the full completed firearm. Previously it sounded like it may just be upper receiver, then it was upper and lower.
@@TATVCanadaI stripped the AR-15 right down to the basic bare aluminum receiver years ago. Then I got the “nulliying” letter.
Keep up the good work!
Thanks, will do!
Hey I plan on doing a video breakdown of the 2020 OIC and the CCFR's legal trial in a few weeks here. May I use your video content in that series? Particularly in the section I'm going to do about "what is an ASF?"
Absolutely; just throw a citation or link in the description and that's just fine.
Of course. I always cite all my sources in the description. Thanks
Well spoken
Thanks!
well said
Thanks a lot, mate.
Great video
Thanks!
Well explained!
Thank you very much.
Great video explaining the gun confiscation.
Thank you very much.
Maybe they should LOOK Up the barrels to make sure their straight !!!
I'm not convinced many of them would never know which end that references.
You didn't touch on the $6200 assessment of SG550...! 🤔 They were $3500 - $4000 a year or two before the OIC.
Someone on the "assessment committee" likely owned, or knew someone who owned a few... 🤨
I don't have any personal experience with that particular firearm, so I can't really comment on that.
All I can say Foxtrot Juliet Tango
Foxtrot Juliette Tango indeed!
He plays magic, bet he rides a motorcycle too. I like him.
Once the good Pierre is elected in 2025, he needs to fully compensate all the gun owners for the full replacement value for their guns, so that they can then replace the guns that were forcefully confiscated and destroyed.
The comical part of this is its exactly what would happen. I would literally buy another semi-automatic, 5-round, magazine-fed, 223 caliber modern rifle with a collapsible stock, muzzle brake, pistol grip and picatinny rail. The only thing that will change is I'll have to spend a bunch of extra money (mind and the taxpayers) for what amounts to a warranty refresh.
@TATVCanada Well the taxpayers should have thought of that before they voted for a gun confiscation.. I have very little sympathy for the taxpayers who are now gonna have to pay more taxes to fully compensate those who, Legally speaking, had their property confiscated at gunpoint.
Hasn't the amnesty been extended beyond the election? All the conservatives have to do, with a majority, is extend it again until they can introduce legislation to scrap it.
As much as every lawful gun owner wants to believe that Mr. Polievre will put an end to this insanity, it will unfortunately come down to numbers. The number of uninformed urban dickheads that want ALL firearms eradicated from Canadian society outweighs the number of gun owners, hunters, sport shooters etc. and there fore they represent a voting block that any politician would be loathe to ignore.
At the end of the day, PierreP is just another politician and I’m far too cynical to think that he and his resultant caucus will do the right thing. 👎🏼😞🇨🇦
@@FinalLugiaGuardian At some point you are going to have to stop seeing the media led female vote as a collective of individual taxpayers with their own thoughts and ideas who knowingly vote for exactly what the outcomes turn out to be
it takes 1 year to get your PAL in Canada
I got mine a long, long time ago, but I think a friend completed his recently in about six months give or take.
Umm no it takes less than 1 yr, how do I know because I signed on the dotted line for a gent I've known 10 yrs and honestly that was a mistake and I'll tell you why, I am a retired gunsmith ( still dabble a bit with CO2 set ups for personal practice and nothing for sale or gifted either !! Reasons to be clarified later ) but this gent got his pal after 6 months, he did a so called gun safety course got his pistol and rifle papers, then he goes to the local princess auto opens up an air pistol package, cocks it loads it then fires the dam thing in the store ! And now he's all on his high horse that he's got these 2 tags, and did safety course he knows everything and wtf he did was wrong ! And now he wants an improvised high powered pistol for his home protection ! Like seriously when he told me wtf he did I flipped out on his ass because regardless of CO2, break action, live ammo you never ever do that shit then harrass for a modified pistol for night time protection ! F🤐🤐🤐 that ! And honestly I will never sign for anybody else again not will I sell or give anybody anything especially with that bad attitude ! I am a pistol and rifle lover and what pisses me off is these people who do not instruct these safety courses properly and what seriously burns my ass off is I can to the end of my block and pick up a sawed 12 guage with tape on handle for $150, will I hell no but these idiots that do sell illegally and do shit illegally should not get club fed vacations of 3 hots and a cot and free schooling to screw with the system and get away with it !! Burns my ass off ! Sorry but between the criminals getting away with this shit and the crooked govt which both are well let's just say enough is enough and time to start getting with the dam program ! Enough !
I got mine in 5 months
Got mine in 2 months. 4 weeks to get my test back. Then it was approved and sent out the day after the 28 day cooldown period. Even my instructor said it’ll take around 4-5 months
Alberta boy (old man 😢) here. Sent my RPAL renewal in 8 weeks before my expiration birthday. Had the card in my hands in 4 weeks. Over the years the quickest was under 4 weeks and the average since the PAL started (did I mention old?) has been about 4 weeks.
aren't you allowed to just strip the rifle and turn it in without any of the attachement ? I'm not familiar with the "buyback".
That's a really good question! There are a few different issues here that make it hard to answer, not the least of which being that Canada has never done anything like this before, so there's not a lot of history or precedent. Ordinarily, Canadian law recognizes the receiver as the actual 'firearm' as it contains the action and usually the serial number. Assuming they proceed accordingly, theoretically you could retain accessories or parts. The reality of the situation is the liberals have been pretty clear that anything related to these guns will also be prohibited, including magazines. One of the challenges for those of us affected by it is that even in the event the government allowed us to retain 'non-firearm' parts, most of them will be useless as you no longer have the gun they fit and/or anyone to sell them to since they're in the same boat. In my case I have several very expensive gun gases with custom cut foam, an ar specific optic, and spare/performance parts that can't be used for anything else. I also have a full set of reloading equipment, bullets and brass for 223-- but my AR's are the only 223 caliber firearms I own. The resale value of anything 223 here has been cut to ribbons due to the massive reduction in demand. It's like having your gasoline powered car seized, but being told you can keep the gasoline and cans when the only cars left on the road are electric. I've got over 20k pieces of brass that I'd be lucky to get anything for at this stage.
I was going to type great metaphor but is it a simile since you used the word like?
I've paid over $100,000 in federal taxes in 7 years. I haven't seen one bloody nickel of that benefit me personally.
You haven’t driven on any roads, walked on any sidewalks, used any water sources, seen police, ambulance or fire, watched TV, used the internet?…
@@yobrodontshoot1130 That's not federal jurisdiction. Your talking about provincial or municipal. Come on think or are you a bot?
@@blingbling574 So you’re saying zero federal taxes are spent at the provincial level AND that no federal taxes are spent on anything for the citizenry?…
And you’re calling me a bot? You seem to have no idea how taxes get distributed from federal, to provincial, to municipal levels.
But alright. Let’s shut down all passport services, no more Canadians can leave Canada. Since the taxes don’t aren’t spent of monitoring who comes in or who comes out. No passport office means no passports, so have fun ever leaving when you require one to travel.
Interprovincial logistics? Forget about it. Who need federally funded highways and support projects?
Let’s disband the military, coast guard, weather services, TV (due to national federal licensing), sovereignty patrols? Who needs em.
Maintaining air space? Why do that…
Global trade? We’ve never relied on that…
People in the territories? Who cares?
Healthcare is also funded federally down to a provincial level…
But hey. You’re right. Federal Taxes just sit in the bank and do nothing, apparently. It’s not like every provincial budget handed over by the federal system comes from the federal system or anything.
@@yobrodontshoot1130 Not a bot, but a troll.
@@blingbling574 All you’ve done is concede that you have no idea how taxes work…
I have to say at least they are offering realistic offers. Here in the United States 🇺🇸 they offer people a 50 dollar gift card to Walmart or Target if your lucky a pre paid gift card. At the end of the day I DONT and won’t even consider participating in this sort of thing. I just wanted to point this out and an say your government isn’t playing around. They want those firearms!!!!! And if your government is going to offer that kind of money. A lot of people are going to do it
I can’t believe your story! That is criminal!
That being said the money our government is “buying” our guns for represents the cheapest model and make of the firearms. It also doesn’t take into account upgrades, dedicated optics, accessories or reloading/ammo equipment and supplies.
@@chrisfournier6144brother believe it your government isn’t messing around. I hope your taking this seriously. What scares me is if this does work in Canada 🇨🇦 I see it most likely happening in the United States 🇺🇸. Money talk BS walks and that kind of money is in most cases fair. Even though I know a good rifle is worth it’s weight in gold in protection of my rights. But not everyone thinks that way most people want the government to take care of them.
I paid $1,500 for mine 10 years ago and that doesn't include any of the upgrades, accessories, case or reloading equipment I bought specifically for it. They can keep their $1,300.
@@Johnny-jr2lq young guys will not be going along with this. everyone over 40 will come up with some "weak man" excuse to die on their knees though iv noticed.
I could almost believe one of the goals of the inflated costs of living in Canada in the past three or so years was to make selling your firearms more attractive to firearms owners. If they are feeling the pinch and not knowing how to pay for groceries and mortgages, selling your $5K Daniel Defense AR15 might seem like a good idea.
SK will be paying more as they established provincial laws.
As I understand it sk won't be cooperating at all.
@@TATVCanadarunkle of the bailey - provinces against the feds
@@bradyelich2745 Ah yes, Ian is a smart guy. I'm glad he's on our side.
SK and AB will be kicking back having Pilsners and watching the other provinces having to host the Brown Shirts. -UNLESS- people start voting in Conservative majorities provincially. 🍻🍺🍺
Just before all,this b.s…before we had to call in this and that ….i sold all my stuff ..I seen buddies pal it was legit ….and it was done …..good luck
I've definitely heard that many times before. I firmly believe they intend(ed) to make things as miserable and cumbersome as possible to try and smother gun ownership while pretending its a "declining level of interest". Everything from the long gun registry and ATT's for restricted class firearms to the absurd waiting times on hold with the CFP and inexcusable processing delays is designed to just grate on you until you give up and say it's not worth it.
I feel bad for Canada in the end of the world happen they’re gonna lose that’s sad. No wonder Canada sucks.
A buyback? With what money? Taxpayer? So they can give me back a little bit of what I already pay? A scam is what this is. 😂
After they give you back a piece of your own money they'll probably still expect you to treat it as income and pay tax on it again.
FJT !
Amen to that.
The government didn't include the cost of flesh and blood of it's agents when they attempt to break in and assault my dwelling.
Somedays I feel like that too, but that's what they want us to do.
@@TATVCanada they most certainly do not want that. it's why enforcement in smaller towns and gangland doesn't happen, because it will cost. our nation is very dependent on the use of media to project a narrative of almost omniscient state power, and any scenario that pops up like say Oka, reveals the true nature of their handle on things, or rather lack of it. obedience is not the way forward
This is an absolutely terrible argument for this.
That said, nothing about the "byback" is, in any way, useful to make people more safe.
Canadian assault rifle is a Liberal having the nerve to knock on my door
Lol
move to a country with gun rights.
Some days I wish I could.
Hopefully all this is gone next election
Vote blue
Last I heard the Liberals are pushing hard to try get *something* started during the election so they can point and say "Look how we're toughening up gun control', knowing full well it's not sustainable or logical. Then when they lose they can just dump it on the Conservatives on their way out the door.
Great vid. Ty. Shared.
Thanks very much, friend.
I have held a unloaded glock once in my life, I do not possess a PAL, I do not seek a fire arm or PAL.
I know this whole thing is a liberal SNAFU.
I stand with legal, responsible, upstanding Canadian gun owners.
Thank for you being a reasonable person able to rise above the rhetoric and scaremongering
Thank you for your support. GY6