Yeah well obviously that’s not an argument against a God but it in an argument against the God of the (inerrant) Bible. To be honest I don’t find contradictions as a reason that convincing, but yeah
@@azophi Debunking catholicism I'm more blessed than mary Proof = Luke 11:27-28 27 And it happened, as He spoke these things, that a certain woman from the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts which nursed You!” 28 But He said, “More than that, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it!” In Luke 11:27 that random woman LITERALLY said Jesus your mother is Blessed, but are Lord Jesus LITERALLY said Believers are more Blessed than mary. Amen and Amen _________________________ CHRIST alone John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. ACTS 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” There is only One Mediator between God and men, LORD Jesus Christ= 1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus. Hebrew 9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. Hebrew 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel. Hebrew 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises. Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by One Spirit to the Father John 15:5 5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. _________________________ Work of God = John 6:28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” 29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.” _________________________ 1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach Paul allows bishops to get marry, but catholic church goes against paul. Now these catholic will give a Verses from 1 Corinthians7 to say that paul gave the advice to stay unmarried. But they will not tell you that the same chapter they quote says 1 Corinthians 7:28 "even if you do marry, you have not SINNED". The passage literally says "young women, young men" and a bishop is supposed to be a Church ELDER. Mic drop _________________________ Jesus said Matthew 23:9 9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. And also said Holy Father to Heavenly Father= John 17:11 11 Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are. Jesus said call no one Father but still catholics call *pope holy father. Sad _________________________ Whenever a catholic argue about mary being the mother of God Use this to defeat the argument. Luke 8:21 But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.” Matthew 12:46-50 46 While He was still talking to the multitudes, behold, His mother and brothers stood outside, seeking to speak with Him. 47 Then one said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak with You.” 48 But He answered and said to the one who told Him, “Who is My mother and who are My brothers?” 49 And He stretched out His hand toward His disciples and said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! 50 For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.”. Mark 3:35 For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother.” John 19:26-27 26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home. ( Jesus basically said John is the son of mary, and mary is the mother of John from that time onwards). By the way sarah is the mother of all proof=Galatians 4:21-26. _________________________ We should not pray to apostles Romans 1:25 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Acts 10:25-26 25 As Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter lifted him up, saying, “Stand up; I myself am also a man.” Acts 14:15 15 and saying, “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them, Revelation 19:10 10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, “See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Revelation 22:8-9 8 Now I, John, saw and heard these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel who showed me these things. 9 Then he said to me, “See that you do not do that. For I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren the prophets, and of those who keep the words of this book. Worship God." Colossians 2:18 18 Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, You cannot go to Father through saints nor mary, you can only go to the Father through Lord Jesus Christ= John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father. Holy Spirit intercedes for us=Romans 8:26 26 Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. And CHRIST as well=Romans 8:34 34 Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. Hebrews 7:25 25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. It's Christ and Holy Spirit who intercedes for us not apostles _________________________ Apostles are allowed to marry, 1 Corinthians 9:1-5 1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? 2 If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you. For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord. 3 My defense to those who examine me is this: 4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas? If Peter (peter is cephas read John 1:42) the so called "first pope" was married, why does the catholic church doesn't allow "pope" to marry? _________________________ The so called vicar of christ/ pope/holy father Peter called himself a fellow elder in 1 Peter 5:1, and as per the qualifications of elder in Titus 1:5-9 the elder is allowed to get married; then why does the "pope" is required to be celibate and catholic? ( when Peter was neither celibate nor catholic). 1)Peter was not perfect human nor was he a perfect disciple 2)He sank down while walking on water 3)Our Lord said to peter get behind me satan 4)Peter reject our Lord 3 times 5)Our Lord rebuked Peter for calling fire from heaven 6)Our Lord rebuked Peter when he cut of the soilders ear 7)Paul rebuked Peter for being hypocrite because he was acting different in front of Jews and different in front of gentiles. 8) Moses messed up, and he was a important part of Bible ( that's why he never entered the promised land), 9)David messed up ( and he has the Holy Spirit), 10)King Soloman messed up, 11) Saul messed up and God regretted the decision (1 Samuel 15:10-11). Hatrick (Saul then David then Soloman back to back messed up) 12)The apostles run away a day before Lord Jesus got locked up. 13)The early church messed up Rev 2:18-20, 1 Corinthians, Galatians. 14) Apostle John when receiving Revelation worshiped an angel and the angel said "see you do not do that. Worship GOD" Revelation 22:8-9 If these great people could mess up, why do you think the catholic church wouldn't mess up. _ Galatians 4:21-26 21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar- 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children- 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. Sarah is mother of all, Not mary Also the Church has many name like Christians, Evangelists, Children of God, Believers, servents of God, bride of Christ, but not once the Church is called catholics Changed the 10 commandments by deleting 2nd commandment, and dividing the 10th into 2 commandments. Also changing the real Saturday Sabbath to fake sunday sabbath.
@@thomasrobinson8789 Exactly? Should the entire system of morality bend to the will of Richard Dawkins? 😂 A silly, yet unfortunately common argument made by atheists.
@@mr.mayonnaise2095 Debunking catholicism I'm more blessed than mary Proof = Luke 11:27-28 27 And it happened, as He spoke these things, that a certain woman from the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts which nursed You!” 28 But He said, “More than that, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it!” In Luke 11:27 that random woman LITERALLY said Jesus your mother is Blessed, but are Lord Jesus LITERALLY said Believers are more Blessed than mary. Amen and Amen _________________________ CHRIST alone John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. ACTS 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” There is only One Mediator between God and men, LORD Jesus Christ= 1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus. Hebrew 9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. Hebrew 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel. Hebrew 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises. Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by One Spirit to the Father John 15:5 5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. _________________________ Work of God = John 6:28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” 29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.” _________________________ 1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach Paul allows bishops to get marry, but catholic church goes against paul. Now these catholic will give a Verses from 1 Corinthians7 to say that paul gave the advice to stay unmarried. But they will not tell you that the same chapter they quote says 1 Corinthians 7:28 "even if you do marry, you have not SINNED". The passage literally says "young women, young men" and a bishop is supposed to be a Church ELDER. Mic drop _________________________ Jesus said Matthew 23:9 9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. And also said Holy Father to Heavenly Father= John 17:11 11 Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are. Jesus said call no one Father but still catholics call *pope holy father. Sad _________________________ Whenever a catholic argue about mary being the mother of God Use this to defeat the argument. Luke 8:21 But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.” Matthew 12:46-50 46 While He was still talking to the multitudes, behold, His mother and brothers stood outside, seeking to speak with Him. 47 Then one said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak with You.” 48 But He answered and said to the one who told Him, “Who is My mother and who are My brothers?” 49 And He stretched out His hand toward His disciples and said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! 50 For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.”. Mark 3:35 For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother.” John 19:26-27 26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home. ( Jesus basically said John is the son of mary, and mary is the mother of John from that time onwards). By the way sarah is the mother of all proof=Galatians 4:21-26. _________________________ We should not pray to apostles Romans 1:25 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Acts 10:25-26 25 As Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter lifted him up, saying, “Stand up; I myself am also a man.” Acts 14:15 15 and saying, “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them, Revelation 19:10 10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, “See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Revelation 22:8-9 8 Now I, John, saw and heard these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel who showed me these things. 9 Then he said to me, “See that you do not do that. For I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren the prophets, and of those who keep the words of this book. Worship God." Colossians 2:18 18 Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, You cannot go to Father through saints nor mary, you can only go to the Father through Lord Jesus Christ= John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father. Holy Spirit intercedes for us=Romans 8:26 26 Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. And CHRIST as well=Romans 8:34 34 Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. Hebrews 7:25 25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. It's Christ and Holy Spirit who intercedes for us not apostles _________________________ Apostles are allowed to marry, 1 Corinthians 9:1-5 1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? 2 If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you. For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord. 3 My defense to those who examine me is this: 4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas? If Peter (peter is cephas read John 1:42) the so called "first pope" was married, why does the catholic church doesn't allow "pope" to marry? _________________________ The so called vicar of christ/ pope/holy father Peter called himself a fellow elder in 1 Peter 5:1, and as per the qualifications of elder in Titus 1:5-9 the elder is allowed to get married; then why does the "pope" is required to be celibate and catholic? ( when Peter was neither celibate nor catholic). 1)Peter was not perfect human nor was he a perfect disciple 2)He sank down while walking on water 3)Our Lord said to peter get behind me satan 4)Peter reject our Lord 3 times 5)Our Lord rebuked Peter for calling fire from heaven 6)Our Lord rebuked Peter when he cut of the soilders ear 7)Paul rebuked Peter for being hypocrite because he was acting different in front of Jews and different in front of gentiles. 8) Moses messed up, and he was a important part of Bible ( that's why he never entered the promised land), 9)David messed up ( and he has the Holy Spirit), 10)King Soloman messed up, 11) Saul messed up and God regretted the decision (1 Samuel 15:10-11). Hatrick (Saul then David then Soloman back to back messed up) 12)The apostles run away a day before Lord Jesus got locked up. 13)The early church messed up Rev 2:18-20, 1 Corinthians, Galatians. 14) Apostle John when receiving Revelation worshiped an angel and the angel said "see you do not do that. Worship GOD" Revelation 22:8-9 If these great people could mess up, why do you think the catholic church wouldn't mess up. _ Galatians 4:21-26 21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar- 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children- 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. Sarah is mother of all, Not mary Also the Church has many name like Christians, Evangelists, Children of God, Believers, servents of God, bride of Christ, but not once the Church is called catholics Changed the 10 commandments by deleting 2nd commandment, and dividing the 10th into 2 commandments. Also changing the real Saturday Sabbath to fake sunday sabbath.
This video reminds me of an old Chesterton agreement for miracles: Why don't you believe in miracles? Because they're reported by peasants! Why don't you believe peasants? Because they report miracles!
@@jackyzhu9761 why are you watching a video talking about God and scrolling through the comments of said video if you don't believe in God. Why do you people even argue with us our religion dosen't affect you if you won't even listen
ipso246 01 Oh, I don't know. If he can't admit that Christian teaching is right, does he really like Jesus's moral teachings? "Take up your cross and follow me..."
+ChesterKhan It's more not realistic enough because Dawkins never makes this argument and it's a complete and blatant strawman, but hey, what do I really expect from yah?
Lutherans, this weird mix of Catholic and Protestant that allows them to make humor that can be enjoyed (with some exceptions) by all. Kind of like Episcopalians with a spine.
Materialism, imperialism created the idea that humanity is an entity that can be controlled by material power, whereas human beings exist with spiritual emotions, belief in God, family ties, cooperation, love, patience, gratitude, etc., with emotions, they are exalted, atheism, denial of God, fashion, etc. It was supported by movies and books, but there is a God, most people believe in the existence of God. we believe, we pray, we prostrate, we worship and we find peace. It is not easy to earn eternal life. Heaven is the place where people who believe will receive endless blessings. The last religion is Islam. People are turning to Islam.
@@brightroarttttbbbb Islam is a hateful nonsense religion that, much like the Mormons, is just bad Christian fan fiction. We love your love of the Lord but will greatly pray for your souls as your salvation will always be unsure if you cannot confess that Christ is Lord. I pray that you will feel the infinite mercy of our Lord.
Materialism, imperialism created the idea that humanity is an entity that can be controlled by material power, whereas human beings exist with spiritual emotions, belief in God, family ties, cooperation, love, patience, gratitude, etc., with emotions, they are exalted, atheism, denial of God, fashion, etc. It was supported by movies and books, but there is a God, most people believe in the existence of God. we believe, we pray, we prostrate, we worship and we find peace. It is not easy to earn eternal life. Heaven is the place where people who believe will receive endless blessings. The last religion is Islam. People are turning to Islam.
Personally I would love to see more Donaal and Conall videos. It's like you hit on this great idea and then dropped it. Elizabeth is right. Do one where Donall and Conall meet Joel Osteen. Or Donall and Conall meet Kris Vallotton, or Todd White.
My goodness, I absolute love these clips. So hilarious! Attending a Lutheran Missouri Synod university is annoying at times, but these videos give me an appreciation for the denomination. Rock it, man!
also, atheists dismiss the 'we don't understand everything god does, but the things we do understand give us enough to go on' argument but replace god with science and they see it as a perfectly valid argument
Science doesn't know everything and doesn't claim to know everything. The Big Bang is an example of this. It's not the universe didn't come from nothing it's that science doesn't really know that far back. What science does know about the Big Bang is that it wasn't an explosion like people who don't understand its claim. The Big Bang is an expansion of the universe that is still going on today and can be observed. Also another thing this video says evolution can't be seen and it's something science accepts which is false. Evolution can be observed I have an evolutionary trait on my arm for one so I can personally observe it. Also, humans have Neanderthal DNA especially like 3% related to Neanderthals on average if you are caucasian.
@@t13596 Science doesn't know anything. Scientists reach conclusions based on experiments or they theorize. They say man has very close DNA to a primate but neglect to mention it is the same percentage to rodents. Evolution is taught in schools as scientific fact even though it is not fact. Without an experiment and a conclusion it is just theory. As far as observing adaptation and jumping all the way to all life comes from a puddle, I would argue that irreducible complexity can not be ignored. The human body may exist without a limb like your arm, but it needs all hormones, cell function, temperature stabilization, individual organs with functions and so on, to work as one, for a human to survive. To believe that these things either came about one by one or all at once is a leap of a theory, not a fact.
@@elliottberkley You haven't really done much research, have you. Newton's theory of gravity is also a scientific theory but look up the word scientific theory. Also, it's not a bad thing to teach evolution in schools and it is observable and we do have fossils look into the evolution of horses and you will find there is actual fossil evidence. Also, this whole idea that everything has to be observable by science lookup universe expansion. Science doesn't know how the Big Bang happen and that's really the best answer rather than having religion tell you God did it. And the Big Bang really isn't the correct either it was more like an expansion. But really look up these things like the evolution of horses and universe expansion.
@@elliottberkley Also it does turn out that humans do have a common ancestor in mice. Doesn't put a flaw in evolution it just kind of proves it even more.
@@t13596 Im not trying to prove God. Just that science will never answer all questions because that would require the scientific method to be used on all questions. My point is those who preach scientific dogma ignore massive holes in fossil records and cant distinguish fact from theory. Hubris.
Robert Livingston You seem to be an "angry atheist". I agree with your point of view and am also an atheist but the way you are pushing it is just pushing christians away from evolution.
Forgive me if I come off as angry to you, but I assure you I am not. And I care little for what effect my comments have on christians as it was never my intention to convince them that evolution is valid via youtube comments.
@@tjblues01 When they use evolution they're talking about the unknown process by which one species can transform into another one (Macroevolution). When most creationists use that term, they're simply talking about a reasonable change within a gene pool. I.e. antibiotic resistance (microevolution)
@@christopherjones7023 I'm sorry but that does not seem to be the case tho. api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion
" I defy you to give me one example of something I believe in despite no other scientist ever observing it." "Evolution" "Dangit" I'm dying. Holy hell.
You can observe evolution by artificial selection under laboratory conditions in bacteria, viruses, insects and if you have a few years to spare and a lot of resources even some mammals (ex. that one experiment to domesticate foxes). Scientists have also observed many examples of evolution in the wild ranging from tree moths in England changing color during the industrial revolution (after the trees got sooty, in just a few years black moths replaced bark colored ones) to flu viruses adapting to vaccines, which is why we need a new vaccine every year.
@@withlessAsbestos Imagine denying evolution after >150 years of an unfathomable large body of accumulated evidence and accusing people who disagree with you of denying evidence... because in 2000 years of Christian history priests and theologians have never done that even once. Google isn't working for me at the moment so I can't fact check that but from first principles I'd expect, in the absence of natural selection, the average chromosome should lose useful information from one generation to the next as a result of random mutation, although I don't know if it would get shorter. Evolution by natural selection isn't a teleological process but rather a constant push against entropy and has an upper bound- that's why humans have vastly fewer useful genes than say corn, we're not "more advanced" than corn but simply stumbled on a really interesting way to use those limited genes. Evolutionary biologists have known all this since something like the 1930s and the key parts (that evolution isn't teleological at least) are covered in high school biology at least where I went to school.
@@AlexanderRM1000 I personally won't believe in evolution no matter how much data you try to throw at me. Darwin's third chapter of the Descent of Man is the most racist, degrading, disgusting, scientifically inaccurate piece of literature in all of science. That alone puts atheism into question because it ultimately denies love, divine or human, as the force that gives everything meaning and substance and instead treats it as a chemical reaction in the brain. Certainly there is genetic drift. That has created a wide variety of life within their kinds of life. But I am not an evolved monkey and a dog doesn't come from a fish or bird from a dinosaur (also known as a dragon by the way). To say that humanity came from apes is the most insulting and demeaning thing that has ever been said about humanity. To say that robs us of our divinely given dignity, changing our existence from who to what, from being to thing, from people to animals, from imagebears, co-creators, and stewards of Creation to meaningless biological soup. When a person is dehumanized in any way, all evils become morally acceptable. You can treat them however you wish. You can murder them, abuse them, and violate them for any reason. You can label them, degrade them, and insult them, after all, they're not important and intrinsically valuable. What then of justice for those who have been wronged? What then of compassion for the hurting and mercy for the weak? The state you believe in leads to barbarism, nothing more and nothing less. God is mean? Evolution is far worse because it comes from nothing.
@@withlessAsbestos Your ignorance speaks volumes, Science haunts progress and stays in the past, if you genuinely believe that then you really have no understanding of what science is, and the points youre making go both ways, religions once considered diseases to be divine intervention and a lot of children have died/are dying because faith healing is still considered to be real today
No, it's more like proving who is the overall best out of two people, so it would be more accurate to say it's like asking two men to prove themselves without fighting, one being a strong, intelligent and successful man vs a man on steroids with not much else to show. Christianity of course being the man on steroids, since they only have one thing to rely on.
John Moore and why do you say that? You actually think the evolutionists have something to go on? Because all of the ones I've talked to seem to think evidence for their side is unnecessary
I could say I have eye-witness accounts of a man eating his own head, write a book about it, and thousands of years later it would have the same credibility as the bible. "Eye-witness accounts" which have been translated and retold millions of times don't automatically make something valid.
This is absoloutely spot-on! Great job, Lutherans! While I find it hard to resist jumping into the comment-debate, I advise against it. I have yet to see anyone chane their mind as the result of a RUclips comment war! Remember, Christians: "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no god.'" All I can say is, that if you want to believe in science and logic, then design demands a designer. Happy Easter. He is risen!
I'm sorry, but if I were to get involved in a debate like this, all you would do is plug your ears and shout over me. Praying for you though! Goodbye :)
Seems like you've confused the words "you" and "I". Best not to project, or the very least not make baseless assumptions. Go on and keep telling yourself that dogma is part of an open mind.
No. I'm actually not. I'm perfectly capable of changing my mind when presented with a well reasoned, evidenced argument. All religions I've come across have merely failed to do so. Not sure why you are making such baseless assumptions about anonymous people on the internet.
The point is the atheist I using circular reasoning. Saying the Bible is unreliable because it contains impossible things like miracles, and we know miracles are impossible because we only find them in unreliable books like the bible.
Except not really. They entirely misrepresent the position of atheists like Dawkins. They do not claim "the Bible isn't true because it says people rose from the dead, people can't rise from the dead because the Bible isn't true." Rather, they claim "it is more likely that the Bible is false than that G-d exists and rose from tbe dead and brought a bunch of people back in the ancient near east. The null hypothesis, that the stories in the Bible are not true, conforms more closely with our observations of reality and as such the hypothesis that the stories of the Bible are true should not be accepted." This is a debatable position, but it is not the silly nonsense position in the video.
"Miracles don't exist because everything has a natural explanation because miracles don't exist!" -An irreducibly complex "intellegent" conscious being enjoying the benefits of existience via a finely tuned universe from the only planet with life.
ShouVertica Mostly not actually, I'm not a fan of "firebrand atheism", the kind of atheist Dawkins is, though the cartoon does vastly simplify Dawkins actual argument as a whole, and ignores important factors.
+Corruptedmilk well yeah, because the argument presented was never said by dawkins. >"if jesus could rise from the dead then others could". Or him not responding to the "if you can't see it". Sorry, i had thought you possessed qualities you didn't. My bad.
I felt it when they said we know it's not possible for people to raise from the dead, that's why it was awesome that he did. Because that's kinda the point, if people didn't already know that it's not possible then we would have never even heard of Jesus.
"I'm going to need a moment to recover from that." It's never a good idea to make a decision solely on emotions (like "I think God is mean") instead of by plain reason. I really have a hard time reasoning with someone who says "I can't believe that because...insert illogical reason like "I don't like it."
If we follow the logic of the people who made this cartoon then we should believe anything and everything that has ever been written down, no matter how much contradictory evidence there is.
The gospel is proclaimed, not argued. The point of the video is that Dawkins’ own vaunted reasonings-which are in fact arguments- are loaded with logical fallacies. The video in itself is not even intended to “prove” anything, but rather to expose Dawkins’ arguments as spurious in terms of his claim that he can /disprove/ the Resurrection or anything else. He claims to be on superior footing, but in terms of his ideology he’s every bit a man of faith as a Christian, because it’s belief, not reason, that puts him where he is.
As of October 2021, this video has three times more views than the channel has subscribers. All other factors aside, that speaks strongly to how re-watchable this is.
Also, if you'd like some evidence for the resurrecrion of Christ, check out "The Case for Christ." It was written by a guy that set off trying to disprove the resurrection and consequently finding mounds of evidence supporting it, ultimately converting because his of his Christian wife's faithful love to him even as he tried to disprove her faith. (He thought he was saving her from a sudden delusion, so no, it wasn't him being a jerk to her. Just being deceived himself.)
A little bird flew in my window and told me that he knew for a fact that Jesus did not rise from the dead. In fact, his body was thrown into a mass grave and was never recovered because no one cared to retrieve it. I asked him how he knew this. He said that he was there, that he is a type of bird with a very long lifespan, and that the resurrection is a hoax. There you have it folks, all the evidence that you need that the resurrection of Jesus never happened.
TheUnknown According to the little bird, there are more than 500 witnesses to his story. The mass grave that Jesus was put in was covered over with dirt and then grass seed was planted. Other birds just like little bird witnessed what he saw. They made that grassy area their home, and they never saw a human emerge from the mass grave. This is an eyewitness account. You can't argue with evidence. Why do you not accept the little bird's evidence?
TheUnknown You would have to ask the little bird if he would recant if threatened with death. I don't know if he is still alive. Its been 4 decades since little bird flew in my window and told me what he saw. After so many decades, this is the first time I have told anyone what the little bird told me. Maybe my memory is foggy.
It's not really a strawmen when over half of Dawkins arguments against god is that he's an evil entity who is unworthy of worship. Try reading the God Delusion for yourself if you don't believe me.
"Evolution" "But people have witnessed evolution!" "When?" "In the fossil record!" "In a record huh?" "Totally different from your book!" "I think you just found a bunch of animals that look similar an extrapolated that conclusion with your confirmation bias. Not fun when someone does that shit to you is it?"
***** I wasn't born in a follower of Christ family... That logic is stupid because their are many Chinese being converted to being followers of Christ _
Most of this is great. The evolution quip probably needs clarification, though. The term 'evolution' can refer to either microevolution, macroevolution, or universal common descent. Universal common descent is the one that can't be seen by anyone in a laboratory, and needs to be inferred by looking at historical evidence...the same way people validate the authenticity of the Gospels. The part at the end with Dawkins saying God doesn't exist because he's mean might be a bit of a strawman. I've only heard Dawkins use God's 'meanness' to say that the Bible shouldn't be the source of our morality, which is a different subject. But one could still argue that God doesn't exist because he's claimed to be omnibenevolent but there are reports of him being evil, the same way you would reject the accuracy of conflicting witness testimonies. The real issue would be Dawkins not understanding divine justice, which you only mentioned in an offhand sentence.
catholicontrast Check out evolution vs God by ray comfort on you tube, you won't regret it. Adaptation (natural selection) is totally separate from the altogether different theoretical process of Darwinian evolution.
Perhaps the evolution quip needs clarification, but since nobody denies microevolution, and since the entire engine of the theory of macroevolution, random genetic change leading to more advanced organisms, is the opposite of everything observed, it wasn't worth muddying up the joke to make that point:-) As for your second point, Dawkins spends the majority of "The God Delusion" depicting the Triune God as a murderous bully not worthy of our faith, so it's far from a straw man.
catholicontrast He thinks God would have to be infinitely complex, and so is less likely to exist. Bad logic, but even sadder when you consider the doctrine of divine simplicity.
pursuing222 There's no credible evidence for any god. If there was, you wouldn't need FAITH and there would only be one religion in the world instead of thousands. The fact that the earth is billions of years old and the undeniable fact that man gradually evolved over millions of years is proof that none of the creation stories are true. They are all primitive superstitions from ignorant people who were so barbaric that they would kill their own children brutally for minor offenses in the name of a psychotic monster god that we can all be thankful doesn't actually exist.
Yep, that’s the issue with arguing from the Bible. Nevertheless, the Resurrection account was written by people who by their own words did not believe in it at first. We tend to forget ancient people were just like us. They might not hae known exactly how a brain shuts down (for that matter, we hardly do), but they did know that when a guy is dead-he dead. The ancients weren’t some unexplainedly gullible goofs: they were reasonable guys who saw something impossible. That’s the point.
Can you prove that reason is reasonable without using reason? because if you cannot then it is a logical fallacy (circular argument) and thus cannot be the foundation of ANY logical argument
TheLutheranSatire The Bible is not a legitimate source of information. Why? Because it makes claims that are either unable to be tested or claims that are scientifically inaccurate. So, there's your justification.
Kami Sure. There is the miracle of the sun, many occurrences of the bleeding Eucharist, and St. Januaris' 1700 year old blood just liquified a couple weeks ago. I could also cite my own witness of a miracle back in 2004 if you want. Here is a link to the story if you want www.christianforums.com/t5446474/ So when you say you are looking for evidence, are you really looking for evidence? Or if I show you a picture of God, are you going to say it was photoshopped? If I call God up on the phone are you going to say "That's not God, it's Charlton Heston."? Are you going to look at it objectively and say that these miracles are strong evidence of the existence of the Divine one? Or are you going to take these real historical instances and deny and/or change them in order to fit your own preconceived notion of a lack of a higher power?
Do you have any perspective or insight in to Dawkins' musings on 1 Corinthians 13:11? I remember him talking about this several years ago. I had a much weaker faith , I was intimidated by his inference that faith was childish. Now, I can't help but see his musings as amusing. Every time I read Corinthians 13, and especially verse 11, I'm reminded I could read the chapter/verse and have as hard of heart. It is by grace alone and faith alone that I can (dimly) appreciate the truth in love. With all the other recommendations, I would like to add, you've done a lot already. Thank you.
"we cant beleive the bible because its just one source". I hear this one all the time. what people dont get is that the bible isnt just one source, its many many sources all throughout history that we have compiled into one easily accessible work. imagine if you said you couldnt cite an encyclopedia because its just one book, regardless of where its knowledge comes from?
"Did you really just argue that God can't exist because he is mean?" I lost it at that point. Well done, Lutheran Satirist.
Yeah well obviously that’s not an argument against a God but it in an argument against the God of the (inerrant) Bible.
To be honest I don’t find contradictions as a reason that convincing, but yeah
@@azophi Debunking catholicism
I'm more blessed than mary
Proof = Luke 11:27-28
27 And it happened, as He spoke these things, that a certain woman from the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts which nursed You!”
28 But He said, “More than that, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it!”
In Luke 11:27 that random woman LITERALLY said Jesus your mother is Blessed, but are Lord Jesus LITERALLY said Believers are more Blessed than mary. Amen and Amen
_________________________
CHRIST alone
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
ACTS 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
There is only One Mediator between God and men, LORD Jesus Christ= 1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.
Hebrew 9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.
Hebrew 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.
Hebrew 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by One Spirit to the Father
John 15:5
5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.
_________________________
Work of God =
John 6:28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
_________________________
1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach
Paul allows bishops to get marry, but catholic church goes against paul.
Now these catholic will give a Verses from 1 Corinthians7 to say that paul gave the advice to stay unmarried. But they will not tell you that the same chapter they quote says 1 Corinthians 7:28 "even if you do marry, you have not SINNED". The passage literally says "young women, young men" and a bishop is supposed to be a Church ELDER. Mic drop
_________________________
Jesus said Matthew 23:9
9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.
And also said Holy Father to Heavenly Father= John 17:11
11 Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are.
Jesus said call no one Father but still catholics call *pope holy father.
Sad
_________________________
Whenever a catholic argue about mary being the mother of God
Use this to defeat the argument.
Luke 8:21 But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.”
Matthew 12:46-50
46 While He was still talking to the multitudes, behold, His mother and brothers stood outside, seeking to speak with Him. 47 Then one said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak with You.”
48 But He answered and said to the one who told Him, “Who is My mother and who are My brothers?” 49 And He stretched out His hand toward His disciples and said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! 50 For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.”.
Mark 3:35 For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother.”
John 19:26-27
26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home. ( Jesus basically said John is the son of mary, and mary is the mother of John from that time onwards).
By the way sarah is the mother of all proof=Galatians 4:21-26.
_________________________
We should not pray to apostles
Romans 1:25
25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
Acts 10:25-26
25 As Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter lifted him up, saying, “Stand up; I myself am also a man.”
Acts 14:15
15 and saying, “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them,
Revelation 19:10
10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, “See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”
Revelation 22:8-9
8 Now I, John, saw and heard these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel who showed me these things.
9 Then he said to me, “See that you do not do that. For I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren the prophets, and of those who keep the words of this book. Worship God."
Colossians 2:18
18 Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,
You cannot go to Father through saints nor mary, you can only go to the Father through Lord Jesus Christ= John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father.
Holy Spirit intercedes for us=Romans 8:26
26 Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
And CHRIST as well=Romans 8:34
34 Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us.
Hebrews 7:25
25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.
It's Christ and Holy Spirit who intercedes for us not apostles
_________________________
Apostles are allowed to marry,
1 Corinthians 9:1-5
1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? 2 If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you. For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.
3 My defense to those who examine me is this: 4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas?
If Peter (peter is cephas read John 1:42) the so called "first pope" was married, why does the catholic church doesn't allow "pope" to marry?
_________________________
The so called vicar of christ/ pope/holy father Peter called himself a fellow elder in 1 Peter 5:1, and as per the qualifications of elder in Titus 1:5-9 the elder is allowed to get married; then why does the "pope" is required to be celibate and catholic? ( when Peter was neither celibate nor catholic).
1)Peter was not perfect human nor was he a perfect disciple
2)He sank down while walking on water
3)Our Lord said to peter get behind me satan
4)Peter reject our Lord 3 times
5)Our Lord rebuked Peter for calling fire from heaven
6)Our Lord rebuked Peter when he cut of the soilders ear
7)Paul rebuked Peter for being hypocrite because he was acting different in front of Jews and different in front of gentiles.
8) Moses messed up, and he was a important part of Bible ( that's why he never entered the promised land),
9)David messed up ( and he has the Holy Spirit),
10)King Soloman messed up,
11) Saul messed up and God regretted the decision (1 Samuel 15:10-11).
Hatrick (Saul then David then Soloman back to back messed up)
12)The apostles run away a day before Lord Jesus got locked up.
13)The early church messed up Rev 2:18-20, 1 Corinthians, Galatians.
14) Apostle John when receiving Revelation worshiped an angel and the angel said "see you do not do that. Worship GOD" Revelation 22:8-9
If these great people could mess up, why do you think the catholic church wouldn't mess up.
_
Galatians 4:21-26
21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar- 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children- 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Sarah is mother of all, Not mary
Also the Church has many name like Christians, Evangelists, Children of God, Believers, servents of God, bride of Christ, but not once the Church is called catholics
Changed the 10 commandments by deleting 2nd commandment, and dividing the 10th into 2 commandments. Also changing the real Saturday Sabbath to fake sunday sabbath.
@@mynameis......23 Wasn’t Mary a believer, making her blessed?
A better question is, where do you get this idea of meanness? And what validates the idea of mean?
@@thomasrobinson8789 Exactly? Should the entire system of morality bend to the will of Richard Dawkins? 😂 A silly, yet unfortunately common argument made by atheists.
You should do Donall and Conall meet Joel Osteen.
Elizabeth Marquardt that would be stupid Patrick
Elizabeth Marquardt But we would have to stab Patrick in the face! :D
Elizabeth Marquardt I already know who would win here, Patrick... !!! (Still awesome though! TheLutheranSatire )
yes!!!
+2
I love how everyone is "Patrick" 😆
This is patrick
Except Donall and Conall.
@@Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis Is this the Krusty Krab?
Ty Freeman no, this is patrick.
I'm not Patrick. I'm Patrick. And that is Patrick. This is Patrick. Do you now know the difference? Not everyone is Patrick.
Whoever did the voice of Dawkins got him exactly right. Happy Easter
Yeah it was pretty good
😀
Maybe Dick was happy to oblige?
@@mr.mayonnaise2095 Debunking catholicism
I'm more blessed than mary
Proof = Luke 11:27-28
27 And it happened, as He spoke these things, that a certain woman from the crowd raised her voice and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts which nursed You!”
28 But He said, “More than that, blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it!”
In Luke 11:27 that random woman LITERALLY said Jesus your mother is Blessed, but are Lord Jesus LITERALLY said Believers are more Blessed than mary. Amen and Amen
_________________________
CHRIST alone
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
ACTS 4:12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
There is only One Mediator between God and men, LORD Jesus Christ= 1 Timothy 2:5
For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.
Hebrew 9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.
Hebrew 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.
Hebrew 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by One Spirit to the Father
John 15:5
5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.
_________________________
Work of God =
John 6:28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
_________________________
1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach
Paul allows bishops to get marry, but catholic church goes against paul.
Now these catholic will give a Verses from 1 Corinthians7 to say that paul gave the advice to stay unmarried. But they will not tell you that the same chapter they quote says 1 Corinthians 7:28 "even if you do marry, you have not SINNED". The passage literally says "young women, young men" and a bishop is supposed to be a Church ELDER. Mic drop
_________________________
Jesus said Matthew 23:9
9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.
And also said Holy Father to Heavenly Father= John 17:11
11 Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are.
Jesus said call no one Father but still catholics call *pope holy father.
Sad
_________________________
Whenever a catholic argue about mary being the mother of God
Use this to defeat the argument.
Luke 8:21 But He answered and said to them, “My mother and My brothers are these who hear the word of God and do it.”
Matthew 12:46-50
46 While He was still talking to the multitudes, behold, His mother and brothers stood outside, seeking to speak with Him. 47 Then one said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak with You.”
48 But He answered and said to the one who told Him, “Who is My mother and who are My brothers?” 49 And He stretched out His hand toward His disciples and said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! 50 For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.”.
Mark 3:35 For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother.”
John 19:26-27
26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home. ( Jesus basically said John is the son of mary, and mary is the mother of John from that time onwards).
By the way sarah is the mother of all proof=Galatians 4:21-26.
_________________________
We should not pray to apostles
Romans 1:25
25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
Acts 10:25-26
25 As Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and worshiped him. 26 But Peter lifted him up, saying, “Stand up; I myself am also a man.”
Acts 14:15
15 and saying, “Men, why are you doing these things? We also are men with the same nature as you, and preach to you that you should turn from these useless things to the living God, who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all things that are in them,
Revelation 19:10
10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. But he said to me, “See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”
Revelation 22:8-9
8 Now I, John, saw and heard these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel who showed me these things.
9 Then he said to me, “See that you do not do that. For I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren the prophets, and of those who keep the words of this book. Worship God."
Colossians 2:18
18 Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,
You cannot go to Father through saints nor mary, you can only go to the Father through Lord Jesus Christ= John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
Ephesians 2:18 For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father.
Holy Spirit intercedes for us=Romans 8:26
26 Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
And CHRIST as well=Romans 8:34
34 Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us.
Hebrews 7:25
25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.
It's Christ and Holy Spirit who intercedes for us not apostles
_________________________
Apostles are allowed to marry,
1 Corinthians 9:1-5
1 Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? 2 If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you. For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.
3 My defense to those who examine me is this: 4 Do we have no right to eat and drink? 5 Do we have no right to take along a believing wife, as do also the other apostles, the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas?
If Peter (peter is cephas read John 1:42) the so called "first pope" was married, why does the catholic church doesn't allow "pope" to marry?
_________________________
The so called vicar of christ/ pope/holy father Peter called himself a fellow elder in 1 Peter 5:1, and as per the qualifications of elder in Titus 1:5-9 the elder is allowed to get married; then why does the "pope" is required to be celibate and catholic? ( when Peter was neither celibate nor catholic).
1)Peter was not perfect human nor was he a perfect disciple
2)He sank down while walking on water
3)Our Lord said to peter get behind me satan
4)Peter reject our Lord 3 times
5)Our Lord rebuked Peter for calling fire from heaven
6)Our Lord rebuked Peter when he cut of the soilders ear
7)Paul rebuked Peter for being hypocrite because he was acting different in front of Jews and different in front of gentiles.
8) Moses messed up, and he was a important part of Bible ( that's why he never entered the promised land),
9)David messed up ( and he has the Holy Spirit),
10)King Soloman messed up,
11) Saul messed up and God regretted the decision (1 Samuel 15:10-11).
Hatrick (Saul then David then Soloman back to back messed up)
12)The apostles run away a day before Lord Jesus got locked up.
13)The early church messed up Rev 2:18-20, 1 Corinthians, Galatians.
14) Apostle John when receiving Revelation worshiped an angel and the angel said "see you do not do that. Worship GOD" Revelation 22:8-9
If these great people could mess up, why do you think the catholic church wouldn't mess up.
_
Galatians 4:21-26
21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar- 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children- 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Sarah is mother of all, Not mary
Also the Church has many name like Christians, Evangelists, Children of God, Believers, servents of God, bride of Christ, but not once the Church is called catholics
Changed the 10 commandments by deleting 2nd commandment, and dividing the 10th into 2 commandments. Also changing the real Saturday Sabbath to fake sunday sabbath.
@@mynameis......23 go away
“You sneaky little secularist” haha
That part was so hilarious!
"Stop in the name of logic, before you break my brain."
I gotta remember that one...
That'd be handy for 2020 - 2021....
This is the nicest Richard Dawkins have ever been.
Christopher Johnson He couldn’t exist if he was mean
This is incredible 😂
Richard Dawkins is actually fairly nice hitchen is your rude one but you can’t really be rude to him
This video reminds me of an old Chesterton agreement for miracles:
Why don't you believe in miracles? Because they're reported by peasants! Why don't you believe peasants? Because they report miracles!
Heh. I like that one.
What if the king reported miracles?
Donall and Conall need to meet Bill Nye =-p
JPrivacy id love to see that
Theme song intensifies
Slanting Dawkins’ mouth was genius.
Thunder cannot be God yelling at leprechauns. It doesn't happen nearly enough for that to be the right answer.
Funny! Love the snark.
HAHAHAHA! Well done, sunberries.
And God is not real. For the sake of goat, God is not real.
@@jackyzhu9761 why are you watching a video talking about God and scrolling through the comments of said video if you don't believe in God. Why do you people even argue with us our religion dosen't affect you if you won't even listen
Persephone Queen of the Underworld Oh, believe me, it does.
Not realistic enough. Dawkins would never admit he's wrong. :P
ChesterKhan Hats off to Dawkins though. At least he doesn't hate Jesus like Hitchens and actually acknowledges his moral teachings.
ipso246 01
Oh, I don't know. If he can't admit that Christian teaching is right, does he really like Jesus's moral teachings? "Take up your cross and follow me..."
True. :))
+ChesterKhan It's more not realistic enough because Dawkins never makes this argument and it's a complete and blatant strawman, but hey, what do I really expect from yah?
ShouVertica
What's the part he never argued? What's the part new atheists never argue?
I'm a southern baptist and I got to say I love what you guys are doing on this
Lutherans, this weird mix of Catholic and Protestant that allows them to make humor that can be enjoyed (with some exceptions) by all. Kind of like Episcopalians with a spine.
Materialism, imperialism created the idea that humanity is an entity that can be controlled by material power, whereas human beings exist with spiritual emotions, belief in God, family ties, cooperation, love, patience, gratitude, etc., with emotions, they are exalted, atheism, denial of God, fashion, etc. It was supported by movies and books, but there is a God, most people believe in the existence of God. we believe, we pray, we prostrate, we worship and we find peace. It is not easy to earn eternal life. Heaven is the place where people who believe will receive endless blessings. The last religion is Islam. People are turning to Islam.
@@brightroarttttbbbb Islam is a hateful nonsense religion that, much like the Mormons, is just bad Christian fan fiction. We love your love of the Lord but will greatly pray for your souls as your salvation will always be unsure if you cannot confess that Christ is Lord. I pray that you will feel the infinite mercy of our Lord.
God doesn't Exist *BECAUSE HE'S MEAN!* Priceless brother! Thanks for the great video!
Materialism, imperialism created the idea that humanity is an entity that can be controlled by material power, whereas human beings exist with spiritual emotions, belief in God, family ties, cooperation, love, patience, gratitude, etc., with emotions, they are exalted, atheism, denial of God, fashion, etc. It was supported by movies and books, but there is a God, most people believe in the existence of God. we believe, we pray, we prostrate, we worship and we find peace. It is not easy to earn eternal life. Heaven is the place where people who believe will receive endless blessings. The last religion is Islam. People are turning to Islam.
"Stop in the name of logic, before you break my brain" is an adorable celtic twist on a classic idiom.
Who else here comes back to this video every once and a while because it's just so funny?
👋🏼
I still come back to watch this video, even years after. Pure genius. It never gets old.
The Lord bless you. Laughter doth like good medicine.
Personally I would love to see more Donaal and Conall videos. It's like you hit on this great idea and then dropped it. Elizabeth is right. Do one where Donall and Conall meet Joel Osteen. Or Donall and Conall meet Kris Vallotton, or Todd White.
Donaal and Conall vs West Burrough baptists/calvinists.
I've just watched episodes of this today and I can't believe how informative these videos are and funny at the same time
This is really funny, I loved the part where he said "Did you really just argue that doesn't exist because he is mean"
I'm using this video as a lesson point while preaching to the youth as my church.
My goodness, I absolute love these clips. So hilarious! Attending a Lutheran Missouri Synod university is annoying at times, but these videos give me an appreciation for the denomination. Rock it, man!
May the Lord soften Dawkin's heart.
4:24 "stop in the name of logic before you break my brain!" that's going to be my new catchphrase!
lol. Ye leprechauns rock!
also, atheists dismiss the 'we don't understand everything god does, but the things we do understand give us enough to go on' argument but replace god with science and they see it as a perfectly valid argument
Science doesn't know everything and doesn't claim to know everything. The Big Bang is an example of this. It's not the universe didn't come from nothing it's that science doesn't really know that far back. What science does know about the Big Bang is that it wasn't an explosion like people who don't understand its claim. The Big Bang is an expansion of the universe that is still going on today and can be observed. Also another thing this video says evolution can't be seen and it's something science accepts which is false. Evolution can be observed I have an evolutionary trait on my arm for one so I can personally observe it. Also, humans have Neanderthal DNA especially like 3% related to Neanderthals on average if you are caucasian.
@@t13596 Science doesn't know anything. Scientists reach conclusions based on experiments or they theorize. They say man has very close DNA to a primate but neglect to mention it is the same percentage to rodents. Evolution is taught in schools as scientific fact even though it is not fact. Without an experiment and a conclusion it is just theory. As far as observing adaptation and jumping all the way to all life comes from a puddle, I would argue that irreducible complexity can not be ignored. The human body may exist without a limb like your arm, but it needs all hormones, cell function, temperature stabilization, individual organs with functions and so on, to work as one, for a human to survive. To believe that these things either came about one by one or all at once is a leap of a theory, not a fact.
@@elliottberkley You haven't really done much research, have you. Newton's theory of gravity is also a scientific theory but look up the word scientific theory. Also, it's not a bad thing to teach evolution in schools and it is observable and we do have fossils look into the evolution of horses and you will find there is actual fossil evidence. Also, this whole idea that everything has to be observable by science lookup universe expansion. Science doesn't know how the Big Bang happen and that's really the best answer rather than having religion tell you God did it. And the Big Bang really isn't the correct either it was more like an expansion. But really look up these things like the evolution of horses and universe expansion.
@@elliottberkley Also it does turn out that humans do have a common ancestor in mice. Doesn't put a flaw in evolution it just kind of proves it even more.
@@t13596 Im not trying to prove God. Just that science will never answer all questions because that would require the scientific method to be used on all questions. My point is those who preach scientific dogma ignore massive holes in fossil records and cant distinguish fact from theory. Hubris.
I live how it just goes blank at the end. That gave me time to recover my oxygen level.
I was already laughing by "Okay Patrick" 😂
There was also that dude in 2 Kings that fell on the bones of Elisha and came back to life
That was an impressive shift of the burden of proof there.
Especially when you start with the conclusion and reverse engineer it.
It's literally called satire lol
Dai Xiu Satire is comedy with a point which I doubt is what you thought it was.
Kind of like what atheists do, as depicted in the above video.
@@yalewaller5721
Starting with the conclusion.
I have actually heard of lawyers trying to use loopholes to throw out evidence and sometimes it happens- not that such is justice but it does happen 😢
The reference to stabbing in the face LOL
...Evolution.
Dang, it.
***** Clearly you don't understand evolution if you enjoyed that ill-informed quip.
Robert Livingston
quips are funny
Robert Livingston You seem to be an "angry atheist". I agree with your point of view and am also an atheist but the way you are pushing it is just pushing christians away from evolution.
Forgive me if I come off as angry to you, but I assure you I am not. And I care little for what effect my comments have on christians as it was never my intention to convince them that evolution is valid via youtube comments.
Robert Livingston evolution...
Dang it!
Lmao
One of the best you've done. Excellent job from a Reformed Baptist brother!
This just made my day ❤️
Hillarious and true! Well done. Keep em coming
3:50 "I defy you to give me one example of something I believe in despite no scientist having seen it happen" "Evolution" "DANG IT!"
Of course beside of that, the science has mountains of evidences for the evolution.... Funny video though :-)
@@tjblues01 and they have plenty of arguments against evolution. Funny comment tho
@@annalenaguptara7130 Like what? None of those arguments, as I've seen so far, were anywhere close to be scientific. Can you give me an example?
@@tjblues01 When they use evolution they're talking about the unknown process by which one species can transform into another one (Macroevolution).
When most creationists use that term, they're simply talking about a reasonable change within a gene pool. I.e. antibiotic resistance (microevolution)
@@tjblues01 speaking of science can you say something scientific in evolution? Thank you.
So...I'm not the only one to have these types of conversations in the shower?
Keep up the wonderful work "Patrick."
That burn on "I defy you to give me an example of something I believe in, despite no scientist having seen it happen."
I simply love when the ginger twins call anyone or anything 'Patrick'
Oh, Donall and Conall we need you now more than ever
Prepare for butthurt atheists and Dawkins.
If you make an argument, people have the right to refute it, don't cry cuz you don't get the only voice on the topic.
You can try to refute it, but you'll just fail miserably.
@@christopherjones7023 I'm sorry but that does not seem to be the case tho.
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion
Well i just find it funny and I am an atheist.
Nah. I use enough lube. Besides, this is pretty funny.
Donal and Conal meet Joyce Meyer would be epic!
I love these videos. Thank you for making them :)
It always puts such a smile on my face.
"yeah that was *awesome*" might be my favorite quote from this series
Hans, would love to hear Con & Don talk about the unicorn, both rhinos and the mythical ones. Love your stuff.
" I defy you to give me one example of something I believe in despite no other scientist ever observing it."
"Evolution"
"Dangit"
I'm dying. Holy hell.
You can observe evolution by artificial selection under laboratory conditions in bacteria, viruses, insects and if you have a few years to spare and a lot of resources even some mammals (ex. that one experiment to domesticate foxes). Scientists have also observed many examples of evolution in the wild ranging from tree moths in England changing color during the industrial revolution (after the trees got sooty, in just a few years black moths replaced bark colored ones) to flu viruses adapting to vaccines, which is why we need a new vaccine every year.
@@withlessAsbestos Imagine denying evolution after >150 years of an unfathomable large body of accumulated evidence and accusing people who disagree with you of denying evidence... because in 2000 years of Christian history priests and theologians have never done that even once.
Google isn't working for me at the moment so I can't fact check that but from first principles I'd expect, in the absence of natural selection, the average chromosome should lose useful information from one generation to the next as a result of random mutation, although I don't know if it would get shorter. Evolution by natural selection isn't a teleological process but rather a constant push against entropy and has an upper bound- that's why humans have vastly fewer useful genes than say corn, we're not "more advanced" than corn but simply stumbled on a really interesting way to use those limited genes.
Evolutionary biologists have known all this since something like the 1930s and the key parts (that evolution isn't teleological at least) are covered in high school biology at least where I went to school.
@@AlexanderRM1000 I personally won't believe in evolution no matter how much data you try to throw at me. Darwin's third chapter of the Descent of Man is the most racist, degrading, disgusting, scientifically inaccurate piece of literature in all of science. That alone puts atheism into question because it ultimately denies love, divine or human, as the force that gives everything meaning and substance and instead treats it as a chemical reaction in the brain.
Certainly there is genetic drift. That has created a wide variety of life within their kinds of life. But I am not an evolved monkey and a dog doesn't come from a fish or bird from a dinosaur (also known as a dragon by the way). To say that humanity came from apes is the most insulting and demeaning thing that has ever been said about humanity. To say that robs us of our divinely given dignity, changing our existence from who to what, from being to thing, from people to animals, from imagebears, co-creators, and stewards of Creation to meaningless biological soup. When a person is dehumanized in any way, all evils become morally acceptable. You can treat them however you wish. You can murder them, abuse them, and violate them for any reason. You can label them, degrade them, and insult them, after all, they're not important and intrinsically valuable. What then of justice for those who have been wronged? What then of compassion for the hurting and mercy for the weak? The state you believe in leads to barbarism, nothing more and nothing less. God is mean? Evolution is far worse because it comes from nothing.
Wow, creationists still exist?
@@withlessAsbestos Your ignorance speaks volumes, Science haunts progress and stays in the past, if you genuinely believe that then you really have no understanding of what science is, and the points youre making go both ways, religions once considered diseases to be divine intervention and a lot of children have died/are dying because faith healing is still considered to be real today
To ask Christians to prove Christianity without using the Bible is like asking a champion to prove he's the strongest without using his strength.
No, it's more like proving who is the overall best out of two people, so it would be more accurate to say it's like asking two men to prove themselves without fighting, one being a strong, intelligent and successful man vs a man on steroids with not much else to show.
Christianity of course being the man on steroids, since they only have one thing to rely on.
John Moore and why do you say that? You actually think the evolutionists have something to go on? Because all of the ones I've talked to seem to think evidence for their side is unnecessary
Our evidence is all those fossils and earth being dug up and link together to show how the earth *evolved*. What about your book?
Eye-witness evidence of what happened. Beat that
I could say I have eye-witness accounts of a man eating his own head, write a book about it, and thousands of years later it would have the same credibility as the bible. "Eye-witness accounts" which have been translated and retold millions of times don't automatically make something valid.
This is absoloutely spot-on! Great job, Lutherans!
While I find it hard to resist jumping into the comment-debate, I advise against it. I have yet to see anyone chane their mind as the result of a RUclips comment war! Remember, Christians: "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no god.'"
All I can say is, that if you want to believe in science and logic, then design demands a designer.
Happy Easter. He is risen!
StephenTheNerfGuy And claims of design demand evidence. I don't see any design in the world, least of all from a tri-omni being.
I'm sorry, but if I were to get involved in a debate like this, all you would do is plug your ears and shout over me. Praying for you though! Goodbye :)
Seems like you've confused the words "you" and "I". Best not to project, or the very least not make baseless assumptions. Go on and keep telling yourself that dogma is part of an open mind.
Sorry dude! I can't change your mind; you are as dead-set on not changing it as I am. Fare thee well.
No. I'm actually not. I'm perfectly capable of changing my mind when presented with a well reasoned, evidenced argument. All religions I've come across have merely failed to do so. Not sure why you are making such baseless assumptions about anonymous people on the internet.
Someone give this guy a medal!
I'm a Christian, but this is spurious..... and wonderfully hilarious. ^_^
The point is the atheist I using circular reasoning. Saying the Bible is unreliable because it contains impossible things like miracles, and we know miracles are impossible because we only find them in unreliable books like the bible.
@@christophersnedeker no, I get that. But it is still wonderfully hilarious. 😆
Bring back Donnall and Conall please!! They still need to meet Jesse Duplantis, Cleflo Dollar and Bill Johnson.
This tickles my theology major funny bone. I laughed all the way through it. I didn't come here to argue, I came here to laugh.
You guys do a really good job explaining things, keep it up!
Except not really. They entirely misrepresent the position of atheists like Dawkins. They do not claim "the Bible isn't true because it says people rose from the dead, people can't rise from the dead because the Bible isn't true." Rather, they claim "it is more likely that the Bible is false than that G-d exists and rose from tbe dead and brought a bunch of people back in the ancient near east. The null hypothesis, that the stories in the Bible are not true, conforms more closely with our observations of reality and as such the hypothesis that the stories of the Bible are true should not be accepted." This is a debatable position, but it is not the silly nonsense position in the video.
This is probably the best thing on the Internet. Really enjoying this thanks guys.
I am here because of Wretched.
Me too!
love wretched!!!!!!!!
Wretched is great!!
same
Which video does he talk about this?
"Miracles don't exist because everything has a natural explanation because miracles don't exist!"
-An irreducibly complex "intellegent" conscious being enjoying the benefits of existience via a finely tuned universe from the only planet with life.
Atheist, and I find this hilarious
+Corruptedmilk Albeit for different reasons I bet ( ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)
ShouVertica Mostly not actually, I'm not a fan of "firebrand atheism", the kind of atheist Dawkins is, though the cartoon does vastly simplify Dawkins actual argument as a whole, and ignores important factors.
+Corruptedmilk well yeah, because the argument presented was never said by dawkins.
>"if jesus could rise from the dead then others could".
Or him not responding to the "if you can't see it".
Sorry, i had thought you possessed qualities you didn't. My bad.
+Corruptedmilk good to hear a guy who can't take things personal in regards to beliefs :)
+Corruptedmilk HOLY CRAP ACTUALLY?! Legit the first time I've met an atheists say something nice on a religious video.
I felt it when they said we know it's not possible for people to raise from the dead, that's why it was awesome that he did. Because that's kinda the point, if people didn't already know that it's not possible then we would have never even heard of Jesus.
This is so stinking hilarious! (I just wish it really were that easy to win a debate against Richard Dawkins!) It's great though, I love it!
Nobody can win a debate with that man. Because he doesn’t debate he grabs on to one thing and doesn’t let go.
This is a great video. One of the few I've watching twice end on end.
"I'm going to need a moment to recover from that." It's never a good idea to make a decision solely on emotions (like "I think God is mean") instead of by plain reason. I really have a hard time reasoning with someone who says "I can't believe that because...insert illogical reason like "I don't like it."
Still here in 2024
If we follow the logic of the people who made this cartoon then we should believe anything and everything that has ever been written down, no matter how much contradictory evidence there is.
The gospel is proclaimed, not argued. The point of the video is that Dawkins’ own vaunted reasonings-which are in fact arguments- are loaded with logical fallacies. The video in itself is not even intended to “prove” anything, but rather to expose Dawkins’ arguments as spurious in terms of his claim that he can /disprove/ the Resurrection or anything else. He claims to be on superior footing, but in terms of his ideology he’s every bit a man of faith as a Christian, because it’s belief, not reason, that puts him where he is.
As of October 2021, this video has three times more views than the channel has subscribers. All other factors aside, that speaks strongly to how re-watchable this is.
Thanks for this. Donall and Conall always make my day.
Also, if you'd like some evidence for the resurrecrion of Christ, check out "The Case for Christ." It was written by a guy that set off trying to disprove the resurrection and consequently finding mounds of evidence supporting it, ultimately converting because his of his Christian wife's faithful love to him even as he tried to disprove her faith. (He thought he was saving her from a sudden delusion, so no, it wasn't him being a jerk to her. Just being deceived himself.)
I really love the charming speed that last line closed the curtain with.
sounded like Richard Dawkins! haha good job : )
Solomon Jiahui
It was a pretty good impression
A little bird flew in my window and told me that he knew for a fact that Jesus did not rise from the dead. In fact, his body was thrown into a mass grave and was never recovered because no one cared to retrieve it. I asked him how he knew this. He said that he was there, that he is a type of bird with a very long lifespan, and that the resurrection is a hoax. There you have it folks, all the evidence that you need that the resurrection of Jesus never happened.
Precious Love The only thing you are missing is 500 witnesses.
TheUnknown According to the little bird, there are more than 500 witnesses to his story. The mass grave that Jesus was put in was covered over with dirt and then grass seed was planted. Other birds just like little bird witnessed what he saw. They made that grassy area their home, and they never saw a human emerge from the mass grave. This is an eyewitness account. You can't argue with evidence. Why do you not accept the little bird's evidence?
Precious Love Did the bird beg you to confirm his observation with the remaining 500 witnesses still alive?
Precious Love And if someone threaten to put you to death would you recant?
TheUnknown You would have to ask the little bird if he would recant if threatened with death. I don't know if he is still alive. Its been 4 decades since little bird flew in my window and told me what he saw. After so many decades, this is the first time I have told anyone what the little bird told me. Maybe my memory is foggy.
"I defy you to produce one thing I believe in without evidence."
"Evolution."
"Dang it!"
😍😍😍
There is far, far more evidence for evolution than that Jesus got resurrected
Happy Resurrection Day!
I can't get enough of these 2 guys!!!
Forgot to add in dejavu, synchronicity, and serendipity as arguments to why there is more to this universe than science.
A witty and entertaining takedown of some very well-dressed strawmen.
It's not really a strawmen when over half of Dawkins arguments against god is that he's an evil entity who is unworthy of worship.
Try reading the God Delusion for yourself if you don't believe me.
since ive found this channel, ive been told to stop saying" Oh Patrick" when addressing my friends..
I loved the video especially the last two lines. Thanks
His impression is perfect. lol.
"Evolution"
"But people have witnessed evolution!"
"When?"
"In the fossil record!"
"In a record huh?"
"Totally different from your book!"
"I think you just found a bunch of animals that look similar an extrapolated that conclusion with your confirmation bias. Not fun when someone does that shit to you is it?"
Just watched the new one and had to come back and hear this one again. Love Donall and Conall.
God is the God of humor as well.... People seem to forget that....... smile and he will light up your world😄
Lol glad you like dude the christian community needs a giggle sometimes
Beautiful,... Beaten at his own game!
***** I pray you learn about the truth of ahayah the one and only the most high! I have no time for your nonsense goodbye
***** I'm not religious I don't follow mainstream religion when you don't know me I follow Christ I dont follow the typical mainstream ways _
***** I wasn't born in a follower of Christ family... That logic is stupid because their are many Chinese being converted to being followers of Christ _
Sad I can't like that twice.
Excellent. And very funny!!!
That guy is too polite to be Dawkins...
So well done. The smugness of Dawkins' arrogance is accurately portrayed.
Still fantastic after 5 years! 🥇 IMHO
Fabulous in the insanity of 2020-2021!
literally laughed out loud at the end.🤣 Well done! Love these videos.
Donall and Conall meet Bill Nye!!!!!
Now I want to see what would happen if Donall and Conall met Ken Ham.
Most of this is great. The evolution quip probably needs clarification, though. The term 'evolution' can refer to either microevolution, macroevolution, or universal common descent. Universal common descent is the one that can't be seen by anyone in a laboratory, and needs to be inferred by looking at historical evidence...the same way people validate the authenticity of the Gospels.
The part at the end with Dawkins saying God doesn't exist because he's mean might be a bit of a strawman. I've only heard Dawkins use God's 'meanness' to say that the Bible shouldn't be the source of our morality, which is a different subject. But one could still argue that God doesn't exist because he's claimed to be omnibenevolent but there are reports of him being evil, the same way you would reject the accuracy of conflicting witness testimonies. The real issue would be Dawkins not understanding divine justice, which you only mentioned in an offhand sentence.
catholicontrast Check out evolution vs God by ray comfort on you tube, you won't regret it. Adaptation (natural selection) is totally separate from the altogether different theoretical process of Darwinian evolution.
Perhaps the evolution quip needs clarification, but since nobody denies microevolution, and since the entire engine of the theory of macroevolution, random genetic change leading to more advanced organisms, is the opposite of everything observed, it wasn't worth muddying up the joke to make that point:-) As for your second point, Dawkins spends the majority of "The God Delusion" depicting the Triune God as a murderous bully not worthy of our faith, so it's far from a straw man.
catholicontrast Dawkins has had a bus campaign saying God probably doesn't exist.
catholicontrast He thinks God would have to be infinitely complex, and so is less likely to exist. Bad logic, but even sadder when you consider the doctrine of divine simplicity.
James don't get your science from Ray comfort
where's the mic drop?
If you think this was a convincing argument, I feel sorry for you. This is incredibly ignorant.
so what's your mic drop argument for atheism? what's your greatest best argument? aaaaaand GO!
pursuing222 There's no credible evidence for any god. If there was, you wouldn't need FAITH and there would only be one religion in the world instead of thousands. The fact that the earth is billions of years old and the undeniable fact that man gradually evolved over millions of years is proof that none of the creation stories are true. They are all primitive superstitions from ignorant people who were so barbaric that they would kill their own children brutally for minor offenses in the name of a psychotic monster god that we can all be thankful doesn't actually exist.
wow well I guess I wasn't expecting anything intelligent...
what you said was nothing to do with there not being a God. typical angry hatetheist
MAKE VIDEOS AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE DO NOT STOP
Praise be to God, that we get to laugh all our doubts away XD
Atheism drops to 0%
If Batman isn't real, who's light is shining in the sky over Gotham City? Checkmate, Atheists!
Can't tell if you're a Christian or not.
I sure can
Yep, that’s the issue with arguing from the Bible.
Nevertheless, the Resurrection account was written by people who by their own words did not believe in it at first. We tend to forget ancient people were just like us. They might not hae known exactly how a brain shuts down (for that matter, we hardly do), but they did know that when a guy is dead-he dead. The ancients weren’t some unexplainedly gullible goofs: they were reasonable guys who saw something impossible. That’s the point.
Something very traumatic must have happened to that man... I feel so very sorry for him!
Can you produce any evidence outside of the Bible that miracles occur?
Can you justify automatically discounting the miracles in the Bible simply because they're in the Bible? :-)
Can you prove that reason is reasonable without using reason?
because if you cannot then it is a logical fallacy (circular argument) and thus cannot be the foundation of ANY logical argument
TheLutheranSatire The Bible is not a legitimate source of information. Why? Because it makes claims that are either unable to be tested or claims that are scientifically inaccurate. So, there's your justification.
drthmik If you believe that it is circular to use a pen to figure out if it works, then I'll admit its circular.
Kami Sure. There is the miracle of the sun, many occurrences of the bleeding Eucharist, and St. Januaris' 1700 year old blood just liquified a couple weeks ago. I could also cite my own witness of a miracle back in 2004 if you want. Here is a link to the story if you want
www.christianforums.com/t5446474/
So when you say you are looking for evidence, are you really looking for evidence? Or if I show you a picture of God, are you going to say it was photoshopped? If I call God up on the phone are you going to say "That's not God, it's Charlton Heston."? Are you going to look at it objectively and say that these miracles are strong evidence of the existence of the Divine one? Or are you going to take these real historical instances and deny and/or change them in order to fit your own preconceived notion of a lack of a higher power?
This Dawkins impression is eerily good.
Do you have any perspective or insight in to Dawkins' musings on 1 Corinthians 13:11? I remember him talking about this several years ago. I had a much weaker faith , I was intimidated by his inference that faith was childish. Now, I can't help but see his musings as amusing. Every time I read Corinthians 13, and especially verse 11, I'm reminded I could read the chapter/verse and have as hard of heart. It is by grace alone and faith alone that I can (dimly) appreciate the truth in love. With all the other recommendations, I would like to add, you've done a lot already. Thank you.
The ending 😂😂
"we cant beleive the bible because its just one source". I hear this one all the time. what people dont get is that the bible isnt just one source, its many many sources all throughout history that we have compiled into one easily accessible work. imagine if you said you couldnt cite an encyclopedia because its just one book, regardless of where its knowledge comes from?