📷 WANT 📌 SHARP PHOTOS? Change Your SHUTTER SPEED | Landscape Photography Tips
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- 📩 FREE COURSES & CAMERA TECHNIQUE PDFS: www.davemorrow...
📷 PHOTO WORKSHOPS: www.davemorrow...
In today's video, you'll learn how to choose the perfect shutter speed for sharp photos in landscape photography. This video covers, ISO settings, shutter speed, & sharp focus.
🔥LATEST PHOTOS: photos.davemor...
🎤 PODCAST: podcast.davemo...
🏔️ LEARN PHOTOGRAPHY: www.davemorrow...
⛺HIKING EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST: www.davemorrow...
📩 FREE COURSES & CAMERA TECHNIQUE PDFS: www.davemorrow...
#ShutterSpeed #LandscapePhotography #SharpPhotos
Leave a comment with any questions or ideas you have. I love to hear from you all!
Hi Dave,
I really enjoy your RUclips courses, I’ve learned a lot just by following you and watching your workshops. Right now I have a question about your camera. I recall from one of your shows that you’ve switched to the Z7. I’m not sure if you have the first gen body or the Mark II. I’m currently shooting with a Z6II. I picked this body up a few months ago when I wanted to purchase the Z7II but couldn’t find one due to low stocks. Anyway, I’m now once again considering a Z7 II, but wanted to ask if you notice any issues with high noise?
Most of my shooting has been landscapes, cityscapes, travel, and some Astro photography. I’ve also tried a bit of wildlife photography.
I would appreciate your thoughts about this.
Cheers,
Bob
Good lesson there for everyone Dave and seeing the short processing piece is a good reminder for anyone who hasn't seen them is to watch your video where you put your camera through its paces to determine how far you can push your camera's ISO and also your tutorial on colour theory along with the guide. Definitely recommended viewing for anyone wanting to develop their photography skills
never though of cloud blending. It looks like wave blending to get the best feel of the ocean, NEAT
Dave once again good lesson video of technique. Thanks Rich
Are you shooting in Manual ?
Does focus stacking make sense with landscape photography?
Yes, it can. You can get blobs in the foreground that just frustrate. I have struggled with foreground blobs for a long time.
Where is this? The cascades?
Hi Dave, Could not find anywhere else to leave this message. I am having trouble signing in to your school. The password reset is not sending me a link. Hope you can help.
Hey Sherryl, You can just email me Support@DaveMorrowPhotography.com Happy to help you out:)
@@DaveMorrow Thanks Dave.
Your 10 min production is focused on technique and the images.
Contrast that to the majority of producers who, rather narcissistically, have 20 min vids of them walking around, ‘look at me’ with not much else.
It’s so frustrating how unable people are to focus on the essential, preferring to imitate that crap because that’s what everyone else is doing.
Thank you Dave, for sharing all of your photography knowledge! Your videos are very inspiring, down to earth and really educational. I learn something every time I look at any of your videos! Keep up the great work and stay safe out there in the wilderness!
Thanks Larry. Love to hear it. That's my goal so thanks for letting me know. Will do. Take care buddy.
Another tip: if you *have* to use slower shutter speeds then turn on electornic shutter (or silent shooting as Nikon calls it) because that eliminates the shutter slap which causes vibrations
I once was at the Yosemite fireball, had my tripod on snow, and that shutter slap very subtly moved the camera just enough to be visible in the images. It’s super subtle, doesn’t ruin them, but it does potentially limit large enlargements.
“That shoot actually went really well… think I got at least one shot I liked, maybe 2.” I laughed at this, since I have the tendency to expect lots of good shots each time and am always disappointed. 😊 Thanks for the video of your thought process!
I used to think this way, and ended up catching myself being more annoyed at having missed a shot than I would be if I had stayed at home. Now I appreciate the stuff I see, and if I miss the shot then at least I got to witness it with my eyes.
Solid mindset!
Thanks Dave. excellent info as usual. Maybe you could share the benefits of using mirrorless vs dslr. i know you had changed over at one point. thanks!
Nice sharing 😊
Try using a shutter cable release so your hand/body isn't creating micro-shakes in the camera exposure.
no need. 2 or 5 second delay works just as well. Less gear:)
Excellent video Dave cheers mate..
Thanks for another great video Dave.
Great vlog Dave. Thnx
Great tips Dave. Thanks.
More great info! Thanks!
Great tips. Also on the post processing of images. I look forward to all your releases.
Thanks Glenn! Really appreciate that buddy. Have a great weekend.
Thanks again Dave. You really surprised me shooting at f/8. With a composition like this, I would have probably gone to f/13 without thinking below f/11 !
I didn’t notice that when first watching. Dave, can you explain your choice of f/8 here? I also would have thought to pick something higher given the distance of what you were shooting (but my photo skills are not good!)
Here's the decision process for every shot: www.davemorrowphotography.com/aperture-priority-mode
very good photos I love the colors congratulations
Thanks Ariel!
I notice that you have a green string strap and I am thinking it is because it causes less camera shake? Think your videos are right up there, thank you.
Lighter and less shake. Thanks!
Dave but when you walk is comfortable for the neck?
Thanks
From one Morrow to another....great video!
Thanks Gary! Good to hear from you.
To be clear, the noise mentioned here is a function of the faster shutter speed, not the higher ISO. "Shot noise" vs. "read noise." It's easy to conflate these ideas or not even realize that there are different sources of noise. Moreover, when using a setting where the shutter speed adjusts automatically when you change ISO, it can seem ambiguous as to which of those changes is really causing the noise. But it's not an unsolved mystery. When the shutter speed is too fast to collect enough light to wash out the always present shot noise that is in every digital image, you get a noisy image. The other kind of noise that is introduced by the gain adjustment of a high ISO setting, called read noise, is typically less noticeable and it is always advisable to turn up ISO if you cannot slow down your shutter speed or open your aperture to get more light. It is better to dial up the ISO in that case than to take a picture with the histogram too far to the left.
I don't agree. ISO 800 definitely decreases the Signal to Noise ratio enough to see a decent amount of ISO noise. Exposing to the right increases the electron count in each pixel well, reaching full well capacity for the brightest pixels, so the image is optimized in this case. Here is my technical article on the topic. See what you think: www.davemorrowphotography.com/iso-photography
here is my camera technique workflow, designed to optimize around shutter speed & maximized SNR. www.davemorrowphotography.com/aperture-priority-mode
@@DaveMorrow In your article you describe a shot from the Li River in China. Ultimately, you correctly raised the ISO because you had already maxed your aperture and your shutter speed. The final result is better with the higher ISO. At a lower ISO you would not cover up enough of the shot noise that is present in every digital image which would be more noticeable if you boosted exposure in post. What you did was correct. You raised the ISO, increasing the gain and overwhelming the shot noise with more signal. Yes, gain introduces some read noise but the shot noise you got rid of was very much worth the increase in read noise from the higher gain amplification. The mistake that some people make in this situation is to NOT increase ISO, thinking that it will hurt the image by introducing noise. Ironically, this results in a noisier image. It is better to increase ISO in this case, which you did. By doing that you actually decreased the total noise (more accurately, the signal to noise ratio) in the image, despite the fact that you increased the read noise slightly.
@@petertrahan9785 That's why it's important to make every decision from a physics & first principles perspective. Overall the goal is to decrease entropy and collect the most amount of order or energy within a closed system, in this case the image file. Energy information stored as bits. The more photons that strike the sensor, the more electrons are collected within each pixel well, thus a decrease in entropy & an increase in information ( Claude Shannon entropy), thus less noise. Noise or lack of light energy is disorder. Light energy is order or information. Maximize light energy = reduced noise & better image quality. Thermodynamics & information theory in action:)
@@DaveMorrow Agree. The reason I draw this point out is that I had made the mistake of thinking that since ISO increased noise, I should never increase my ISO. But as it turns out, I was getting (Milky Way) images that were much noisier due to NOT turning up the ISO. I discovered this when I accidentally took some shots at a very high ISO (16,000) and they were the best Milky Way shots I ever took. So I started to research and discovered that there is this other source of noise called shot noise and under certain circumstances (low light) you can actually REDUCE the noise in your images by INCREASING ISO. This is something that almost every photographer I have ever met tells me is not the case. Not a lot of people know this. I was one of them and my images suffered from it for a while. I am a big fan of what you do, btw.
@@petertrahan9785 in a past life I was an aerospace engineer. Thermodynamics & entropy are baked into my brain, so got lucky when applying it to photography;) It's super fun to learn about all that stuff. Glad to hear that you're interested in it too! Thanks so much. I really appreciate it. Always fun to have convos like this:) You may enjoy this article as well, goes into bits & information theory for photography: www.davemorrowphotography.com/camera-sensor-size-guide
Excellent info Dave
Thanks Jerry!
What if using bkt 3 pic then combine to keep hight light ? And using remote ? And focus shift. I thought pro photo use it all the time land scape @_@
Too complex. Only need 1 exposure for 95% of shots.