The Process to Becoming a Bishop: How Successors of the Apostles are Chosen in the Catholic Church

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • While Bishop Brennan's installation is fast approaching, his journey here to Brooklyn was not something that happened overnight. The entire process of naming a new bishop can take months, even years. It all starts right in the local diocese and ends with a decision at the Vatican.

Комментарии • 9

  • @gabrieldel3505
    @gabrieldel3505 Год назад +1

    I want to know how the lay faithful are involved in the process? I thought it is more of the leadership of the local church and the Apostolic Nuncio. BLESSED BE GOD FOREVER

  • @petercastellino6997
    @petercastellino6997 4 месяца назад

    FROM MR PETER CASTELLINO , BOMBAY , 2-6-2024.
    TO GET THE VERY BEST CANDIDATE AS A BISHOP BESIDES NOMINATING HIM ELECT TO ENSURE MERIT.

  • @kiwihans100
    @kiwihans100 Год назад

    Spanish Jesuit Bernardino Llorca explained "First rhere was no distinction between 'bishops' ( overseeers) & 'presbyters' ( elders) they were synonemous. ( See Acts 20:17) but gradually the 'bishops' became more important and assumed supreme spiritual authority " ( 'History of the Catholic church'). Then from a group of such 'bishops' in each congregation with equal power, they became a 'monoepiscopate' ( One bishop per cong) then under the influence of the Roman empire they even replaced the secular district rulers of the 'diocese' throughout Italy & europe'. Thus Christioanity in its purer from was replaced by a politically based, harsh, pagan empire! (Just as Paul went on to predict in verse 30 of Acts 20!)

  • @dariusclovis1374
    @dariusclovis1374 2 года назад

    Is the Reformed Rite of Episcopal Consecration of Paul VI valid?

    • @StavrosKing
      @StavrosKing 2 года назад

      apparently, SSPX think it as valid

  • @kiwihans100
    @kiwihans100 Год назад

    Peter, claimed as being one of the very first 'bishops', counselled other 'bishops' " Do not LORD it over the flock" ( 1 Peter 5:3). How is it then that these 'bishops, have a degree in theology ( Peter was an "man unlettered & ordinary" ( Acts 4:13). They live in 'palaces'. Have regal robes, sit on 'thrones' & receive great reverence while wielding authority not only over a congregation ( as in the first century) but over a 'diocease' ( a Roman secular province)? There is no comparison with early Christianity and the catholic & also the protestant church. ( In the UK 'bishops' even sit in the 'house of LORDS'!!) What would Peter think?