One thing not mentioned was what happens when LNG evaporates. It's non-toxic to us as it does so. But it's methane, which is a HIGHLY destructive greenhouse gas. It lasts a very long time in the atmosphere as it contributes to global climate change.
The ideal these folks are trying to explain is that you burn the methane and don't release it to the atmosphere plus just because a bunch of scientist where paid a big grant to come to your conclusion about global climate change doesn't mean that methane is a HIGHLY destructive greenhouse gas.
I know im asking randomly but does anyone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account..? I was stupid forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
Thank you for your knowledge. I came to watch your clip when my country is having high electricity bills right now. Because Thai government agencies do not manage well. Causing LNG to be imported during the price range of up to $ 50, which is 5 times more expensive than the normal price. This caused the Thai people to pay nearly twice as much for electricity.
Nope. Gas has lower CO2 emissions than black coal when burned for electricity, but LNG developments also leak methane, which is a relatively short-lived gas that lasts in the atmosphere about 12 years but still has a warming power about 28 times greater than the same amount of CO2 when calculated over a century.
Considering Natural Gas is a hydrocarbon which CAN form Carbon Monoxide (CO), I wouldn't say it's the cleanest burning fuel, but it is clean nonetheless. Hydrogen is probably the cleanest burning.
What is the greenhouse effect that LNG would have on the atmosphere in the event of a large spill? Just because something doesn't poison the ground, doesn't mean it isn't bad for the environment in large quantities
methane is a potent greenhouse gas for whatever that's worth, but I really wouldn't worry about the tiny amounts (seen from the big picture) that a spill results in. instead worry about all the fossil fuels that are burned on purpose every day!
@@identifiesas65.wheresmyche95 Many cruise ships use LNG, and the engines leak methane a terrifying amount. Overall cruise ships' share in traveling emissions is huge.
@@mattisuoraniemi yeah if they always leak that may be the case, my point was just that the as a percentage of the whole the accidental releases are very small
Natural Gas is only useful if you have a Natural Gas source near you LNG has several drawbacks compared to alternative sources such as other crude oils and LPG. The extraction process for LNG is a threat to underground freshwater sources and it also compromises soil integrity. Additionally, the liquefaction of LNG demands an extensive amount of energy, contributing to increased environmental strain. Furthermore, the processing of LNG releases substantial amounts of methane In terms of distribution, LNG relies on either pipelines or ships, both of which incur higher costs compared to conventional fuel transportation methods. Moreover, despite these drawbacks, LNG fails to deliver a substantial amount of energy, making it a less efficient choice overall
Hi I have a project lesson. For cryogenic applications, I need to compare the thermodynamic analysis of pre-cooled linde homson, simple linde homson, capitza and claud cycles using the ees program. Can you guide me on this?
I am CONFUSED of LNG than that of LPG,what I understood of LPG,it is a gas coming from PETROLEUM PRODUCT,but how about this LNG,what kind of gas /gases comprising this LNG?thanks for responce if there is. Pls. give example of this natural gases.
Good question. I can answer one of those questions for you. To turn LNG back in its gas form, simply let it warm up to room temperature. I wouldn't want to heat up its container, knowing the increase in pressure levels can exceed the container's maximum psi and the results can be lethal. I'd like to know what equipment is used to freeze natural gas.
So, if you were to hypothetically procure LNG, it would need to be refrigerated at all times, or else it will warm up and burst the container. Correct?
Guns Cars and Digits, correct. Unless you were to use the same container used to turn the gas into liquid for transportation. In that case, the said container will have enough room for the expanded gas. But that beats the purpose of turning NG into LNG for transportation reasons.
Had to clarify that to make it incontrovertible. When I got out of engineering school and saw LNG, I thought, "Oh, did they chemically treat it?" and then I heard the phrase, "Cooled" and thought "Ah great, we're making a bomb." Now that I think about it though, if an LNG tank bursts and it's full to the brim, it shouldn't be a violent blast like a CNG tank. The liquid occupies space, so the tank bursts and a smaller adiabatic volume is the initial burst volume, right? Then the rest of the fluid gasifies. I don't like tanks over 250 psi. When they burst, it's dangerous and guaranteed hearing damage. I like fuels such as DME, Methanol, or Xylene. Are you interested in that type of stuff?
Guns Cars and Digits "...it shouldn't be a violent blast like a CNG tank" i think the damage can be quite the same since we're dealing with pressure levels. As temperature increases from -260F (-160C), the LNG starts to evaporate and begins to fill whatever space is available. If said gas has nowhere to go, you can expect a bomb-like explosion occurrence. Another factor to consider is the pressure levels the "container" can handle. As for DME, Methenol or other natural gas resources, of course i'm interested. I plan to use this "technology" to provide electricity to the masses in rural Africa and Asia.
as the freezing temp. of LNG is -182.6 C (@1atm) why we cant cool it upto -175C than keeping at its boiling temp. which is abt -162C, which can Prevent us from forming BOIL OFF gas for certain longer time.??
At first I was like "iF iT iS so sAfe wHy are yoU wEarIng sAfEty GlaSsEs?", then they ate the cracker, drank the water, ate the marshmallow, my thoughts changed to "WTF?!"
What, you've been sleeping on chemistry classes, haven't you? LNG stands for "liquified NATURAL gas", and that NATURAL (!) gas is methane - that thing that decaying organic matter releases; which goes up from marshes, bogs, rice paddies (do you plan on stopping eating rice anytime soon?), and it constitutes a significant part of the gas cows release from their... other ends (any plans for massive culling of cows? no...? Oh, pity...) Methane rises slowly through atmosphere, as it is sligtly ligter than air. When methane molecule gets hit with UV light (the higher, the more UV light, remember?) it basically decomposes/ oxydises into water vapour and carbon dioxide. But WHY anyone with access to internet (-> Wikipedia) can still ask such a dumb question is beyond my comprehension. Beam me up, Scotty...
Thanks for the Liquid Natural Gas demo. The demonstrations are useful, but I wish you would talk more about some of the issues with LNG. Only showing the positive makes people distrustful of the negatives. Should LNG have an odorant added like Natural Gas does to make sure people know when there is a leak? LNG is still considered a greenhouse gas and a contributor to global warming when you let it boil off into the atmosphere. Can anyone explain how the LNG candle worked? If you have to get it super hot to ignite how are you making a candle from it?
The candle was not made from LNG, it was a normal paraffin candle I assume. They lighted it to demonstrate how much less residues the Natural gas' exhaust gases have compared to that paraffin candle.
I'd imagine all consumer gases would have an added odorant added and the candle could have been gas form with some kind of regulator. As for greenhouse gas, let's be real, its a huge oil company that has and will keep disputing global warming.
LNG Candle will work if you have more than 1000 °F ignition source plus the 5% to 15% oxygen ratio in the area. If you use a air butane torches where the flame temperatures up to approximately 1,430 °C (2,610 °F) surely will fire up, as they explain in the video that LNG vapors will only ignite in more than 1000 °F ignition source.
methane gas is liquefied at minus 162, ethane - 103, propane - 40,,,, they all come from wood fibre twrminally degraded in hydrocarbon moliculic structure. What is Shell composed of?
If directly in the atmosphere, methane is a strong greenhouse gas (which happens with cow farts for example) but in this case the gas is consumed and when the combustion occurs, it transform methane into carbon dioxyde, heat and water. Therefore, for equivalent energy production LNG combustion creates less greenhouse gases than oil. One very important aspect of natural gas is also the fact that it releases less thin particles than other fuels.
What else would we use? You say they, like only certain people are using and taking advantage of oil and gas. We will always need fossil fuels. There’s is no substance on this planet that can come close to oil. Millions of products are made from oil. The only way we will advance energy sources like wind, solar, and battery technology is through investment which leads to greater research and development. But that takes money. The world’s economy is based on fossil fuels. This relentless demonization and over regulation of fossil fuels will only hurt that. Whether you like it or not civilization as we know it would cease to exist without oil and gas. Whatever crisis you think this planet is in due to fossil fuels will pale in comparison to a world without them. Facts. Look at what’s happening right now because of the extreme policies that have been implemented over the past year in regards to fossil fuels. It’s absolutely crazy and naïve to think we can go without fossil fuels. Everything comes from, or is a result of oil and gas. Everything. Without them, we’d be living in the 16th century and that’s not going to happen.
@@a-a-ron4679 I say "they" in reference to the custodians of Western Civilization/Modernization who make all these discoveries and decisions to popularize what they seem to think is right, consequences to the health of the planet is often at least decades after-thought. "We will always need fossil fuels". That's because it was decided for you long ago that that's the way to go. You're not a part of the cartel that commercialized the discovery of oil and if you weren't born to see things done this way, you'd have a different opinion. "The world's economy is based on fossil fuel", again, that decision was not made by the world. It's the European hegemony and their monolithic impositons that decide for the rest of the world. For example, there are tribes on this earth that would never accept any values that are contrary to the balance of nature nor conceive the idea to commercialize and therefore overly exploit any type of natural resources in exchange for overly-valued (as determined by the west) pieces of paper known as fiat currency. Of course those tribes had to be attacked, conquered, enslaved and colonized by the Europeans for having too much concern for the preservation of nature over capitalist greed. You have apparently been indoctrinated to see those pro-nature ethnic tribes as nothing but primitive. However, they had the wisdom to live in harmony with nature rather than against it. They had the knowledge to keep things cold all summer long without electricity. They cured diseases without synthetic chemicals that create more problems than they solve, etc. And nothing they did was to the expense of the health of this planet. Today, here we are talking about solving the fossil fuel problem by introducing another problem. It never ends
What's wrong with fracking? Oh besides powering your laptop to make dumb comments like this :D lol. Yay for fracking and unleashing trapped solar fossil energy from deep in the planet. Maybe it'll help us get into the solar system... you never know ;) (see spaceX).
There's no way of easily getting LNG in a vat like that lol, unless they are near a terminal lol - and I doubt all their equipment is intrinsically safe. 100% they probably used liquid nitrogen
LNG, a way to ship natural gas, it is energy very costly, liquefaction and regasification, it produces about 4.1 kg of CO2 emissions per 1 kg of gas from well to whills (end funnel)...it will eventually need to be phased out of everyday use...Go for ne hydrogen economy, it has a future...
well its a good thing then that CO2 is extremely beneficial to life on Planet Earth! So this is a total win/win. Also I would highly recommend going back to coal and regular oil. I mean thanks to human brain power, capitalism and fossil fuels we were able to INVENT new coal scrubbing technologies which reduce any harmful emissions from coal plants by over 99%. Also oil again produces a lot of CO2 which is great for the planet. Even the plankton love it and then feeds the entire food chain. Total win for humanity for unlocking all that trapped solar power trapped by photosynthesis from over 300 million years ago!
@@raffiliberty5722 You know there is a balance in the world. some CO2 goes int o the atmosphere, some sinks. but the problem is that we are putting a lot of carbon in the air that the world cannot sink at the same speed. More carbon means that more energy coming from the sun will be absorbed in the atmosphere, which in turn will lead to more inbalance- then biodivesity lost, extreme temperatures, increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events, floods, droughts, sea level rise, loss of agricultural land... And I recommend you to read about the consequences of extreme plankton population on the ocean (more carbon means more plankton)
@@basakturkmen9236 Here, the only website you should be checking out. They update it with ALL studies that constantly de-myth every claim made by these climate religion worshipers. You can question the sources all you want but you can't question the studies they cite. Here's one on how increasing CO2 by humans is NOT linear increase into atmosphere absorption. This completely debunks what you are worried about. Plants not don't have to work so hard and lose so much water just to get a molecule of CO2. Plants are THRIVING, you should be ecstatic! skepticalscience.com/co2-levels-airborne-fraction-increasing.htm
I'm having LNG for dessert tonight.
hahahaha
Lol 😂
bro what
Me too
Lmao
One thing not mentioned was what happens when LNG evaporates. It's non-toxic to us as it does so. But it's methane, which is a HIGHLY destructive greenhouse gas. It lasts a very long time in the atmosphere as it contributes to global climate change.
That's a good reason to recover it from the oceans, landfills & sewage treatment plants for use before it escapes.
@@atari7001 There is a process to convert Municipal Sewage to Fuel.
It has been done.
Asswipes like Shell and Chevron do not want it to happen.
The ideal these folks are trying to explain is that you burn the methane and don't release it to the atmosphere plus just because a bunch of scientist where paid a big grant to come to your conclusion about global climate change doesn't mean that methane is a HIGHLY destructive greenhouse gas.
No, it doesn't last long in the atmosphere as it is broken down by UV light.
These things should be taught in every school and college!
Theoretical learning is useless without practical knowledge
It looks like these two have gotten a lot of A's in school
if I had a chemistry lesson like this I would get A. But we could only read books and imagine
And they are getting big $$$ salary also.
I have three certified wedgies on both of them.
I know im asking randomly but does anyone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account..?
I was stupid forgot the account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me
@Yousef Jeremiah Instablaster ;)
Very nice demonstration of LNG's properties. Thanks for sharing and educating!
Thank you ❤️😃
Fans from Sri Lanka ❤️🇱🇰
LNG is doing great ,cuz of smart people like you, keep it up
Well, mama says not to drink LNG ..
Great video, wonderful. Thank you!
and then they both got slight headaches after the making of this demonstration.
really cool video, ticks all the right boxes for easy understanding. LNG process for dummies
How much pressure would it take to keep methane liquid at ambient temperature?
great lobbying
Excellent video, many thanks!
Wow Pretty cool properties, and presentation.
Cool Presentation...Interesting & informative.
I start a new job tomorrow building out LNG refuelling stations, this was very informative 👌
Interesting. Thanks for sharing!!!
Thank you very much. It is really COOL...
It is used for rocket engine right?
i hope be one of many people that can taking care our planet with new renewable energy
Thank you for your knowledge. I came to watch your clip when my country is having high electricity bills right now. Because Thai government agencies do not manage well. Causing LNG to be imported during the price range of up to $ 50, which is 5 times more expensive than the normal price. This caused the Thai people to pay nearly twice as much for electricity.
Great tutorial!
Nope. Gas has lower CO2 emissions than black coal when burned for electricity, but LNG developments also leak methane, which is a relatively short-lived gas that lasts in the atmosphere about 12 years but still has a warming power about 28 times greater than the same amount of CO2 when calculated over a century.
Very informative! Thank you for the video.
Considering Natural Gas is a hydrocarbon which CAN form Carbon Monoxide (CO), I wouldn't say it's the cleanest burning fuel, but it is clean nonetheless. Hydrogen is probably the cleanest burning.
Do we know how to get it out of the ground without causing earthquakes and setting the tap water on fire?
man.... what if they added odour like lavender or flower smell when using at fire place or cooking...
Spa
What is the greenhouse effect that LNG would have on the atmosphere in the event of a large spill? Just because something doesn't poison the ground, doesn't mean it isn't bad for the environment in large quantities
methane is a potent greenhouse gas for whatever that's worth, but I really wouldn't worry about the tiny amounts (seen from the big picture) that a spill results in. instead worry about all the fossil fuels that are burned on purpose every day!
@@identifiesas65.wheresmyche95 Many cruise ships use LNG, and the engines leak methane a terrifying amount. Overall cruise ships' share in traveling emissions is huge.
@@mattisuoraniemi yeah if they always leak that may be the case, my point was just that the as a percentage of the whole the accidental releases are very small
@Shell - can we use the video for our training? To whom I can ask permission for the use of the video?
Let me know too!!
The same with liquid nitrogen?
Informative..thanks shell
Mariah seemed to enjoy crushing the flower. Maybe a little more than necessary.
Woah cool science
Great video! at 5:19 I think you meant to write "FROM A GAS INTO A LIQUID" not the other way around. Thanks for this simple demonstration.
My thoughts exactly!!
True, these "engineers" seem suspicious
Same here.
Natural Gas is only useful if you have a Natural Gas source near you
LNG has several drawbacks compared to alternative sources such as other crude oils and LPG.
The extraction process for LNG is a threat to underground freshwater sources and it also compromises soil integrity. Additionally, the liquefaction of LNG demands an extensive amount of energy, contributing to increased environmental strain. Furthermore, the processing of LNG releases substantial amounts of methane
In terms of distribution, LNG relies on either pipelines or ships, both of which incur higher costs compared to conventional fuel transportation methods. Moreover, despite these drawbacks, LNG fails to deliver a substantial amount of energy, making it a less efficient choice overall
Great video I learned a lot from this 👍🏻
Hi I have a project lesson. For cryogenic applications, I need to compare the thermodynamic analysis of pre-cooled linde homson, simple linde homson, capitza and claud cycles using the ees program. Can you guide me on this?
i like your funny words magic man
Nicee... I can use LNG to frozen my foods
LNG is the future
Its a pain... especially when theres moisture in the air... trailer freezes so cold, it freezes the damp air.. cant see an inch in front of me
Soo well presented. Loved it.
Is cooking gas LNG?
Thank you very much for the knowledge. It was a pleasure watching and learning.
- Nirmal Hettiarachchi | CMA CGM Group, 07.05.2018
I feel like I am in a safety meeting on the first day of employment
Aren’t they realizing methane to the atmosphere? ( they are)
They arent realizing anything.
I like it💥💫
I am CONFUSED of LNG than that of LPG,what I understood of LPG,it is a gas coming from PETROLEUM PRODUCT,but how about this LNG,what kind of gas /gases comprising this LNG?thanks for responce if there is. Pls. give example of this natural gases.
When LNG evaporates, does it contribute to global warming?
yeah natural gas is methane
What is different Starbucks nitrogen?
Does this LNG is the same as liquid nitrogen that used in molecular gastronomy?
I think liquid natural gas is different than liquid nitrogen, they're composed differently. An apple isn't an orange although they're both fruits.
No. One contains hydrocarbon compounds of Ethane and Methane, the other contains only the element, Nitrogen.
"the marshmallow is now frozen"
me : okay now let it go
the lengths we go to for a pay cheque
Later on they both became very sick, the two are still baffled why but did say the sickness had nothing to do with drinking LNG.
Go Well. Go Shell 😉
very good :)
Liquid methane. Yeah well you have fun with THAT.
not exactly. Natural gas is 70-90% methane mixed in with a little bit of ethane and/or propane
From now on, I'll exclusively eat LNG-dipped strawberries. YAMMI!!
Which is coolest between LNG, N2, O2 ?
N2 is the coldest, -321 F
I like the title
Thank you for interesting information.
Why density reduces ?
How much energy does it take to make LNG? (And to turn it back into Natural gas)
Good question. I can answer one of those questions for you. To turn LNG back in its gas form, simply let it warm up to room temperature. I wouldn't want to heat up its container, knowing the increase in pressure levels can exceed the container's maximum psi and the results can be lethal.
I'd like to know what equipment is used to freeze natural gas.
So, if you were to hypothetically procure LNG, it would need to be refrigerated at all times, or else it will warm up and burst the container. Correct?
Guns Cars and Digits, correct. Unless you were to use the same container used to turn the gas into liquid for transportation. In that case, the said container will have enough room for the expanded gas. But that beats the purpose of turning NG into LNG for transportation reasons.
Had to clarify that to make it incontrovertible. When I got out of engineering school and saw LNG, I thought, "Oh, did they chemically treat it?" and then I heard the phrase, "Cooled" and thought "Ah great, we're making a bomb."
Now that I think about it though, if an LNG tank bursts and it's full to the brim, it shouldn't be a violent blast like a CNG tank. The liquid occupies space, so the tank bursts and a smaller adiabatic volume is the initial burst volume, right? Then the rest of the fluid gasifies.
I don't like tanks over 250 psi. When they burst, it's dangerous and guaranteed hearing damage.
I like fuels such as DME, Methanol, or Xylene. Are you interested in that type of stuff?
Guns Cars and Digits "...it shouldn't be a violent blast like a CNG tank" i think the damage can be quite the same since we're dealing with pressure levels. As temperature increases from -260F (-160C), the LNG starts to evaporate and begins to fill whatever space is available. If said gas has nowhere to go, you can expect a bomb-like explosion occurrence. Another factor to consider is the pressure levels the "container" can handle. As for DME, Methenol or other natural gas resources, of course i'm interested. I plan to use this "technology" to provide electricity to the masses in rural Africa and Asia.
as the freezing temp. of LNG is -182.6 C (@1atm) why we cant cool it upto -175C than keeping at its boiling temp. which is abt -162C, which can Prevent us from forming BOIL OFF gas for certain longer time.??
it is waste of energy to lower temp.
At first I was like "iF iT iS so sAfe wHy are yoU wEarIng sAfEty GlaSsEs?", then they ate the cracker, drank the water, ate the marshmallow, my thoughts changed to "WTF?!"
How does a LNG spill destroy ozone layer.. any ideas, Shell?
What, you've been sleeping on chemistry classes, haven't you? LNG stands for "liquified NATURAL gas", and that NATURAL (!) gas is methane - that thing that decaying organic matter releases; which goes up from marshes, bogs, rice paddies (do you plan on stopping eating rice anytime soon?), and it constitutes a significant part of the gas cows release from their... other ends (any plans for massive culling of cows? no...? Oh, pity...)
Methane rises slowly through atmosphere, as it is sligtly ligter than air. When methane molecule gets hit with UV light (the higher, the more UV light, remember?) it basically decomposes/ oxydises into water vapour and carbon dioxide.
But WHY anyone with access to internet (-> Wikipedia) can still ask such a dumb question is beyond my comprehension. Beam me up, Scotty...
Nice
Cool video! Congrats!
I m working on IOLPL in Chennai Indian oil LNG- Pvt Ltd
o m g., why on earth i have no idea about how oil and gas produce😱😱😱
i’m so stupid😂😂😂
thanks so much for this information. really huge help!
you are a SWEETY! Finally a normal fun comment! Glad oil and natural gas is here to give you such an amazing life! Enjoy!
Ok. So dry ice which you use is also a gas(CO2), & it's pressurised to form solid. This process is called deposition.
How we start LNG plant ???
Hoy cool down the gas and converged in líquid with compressors and refrigeración procederes?
Sorry how cool down the natural gas to convert in liquid, with refrigeration compressors or others procedures
Thanks for the Liquid Natural Gas demo. The demonstrations are useful, but I wish you would talk more about some of the issues with LNG. Only showing the positive makes people distrustful of the negatives. Should LNG have an odorant added like Natural Gas does to make sure people know when there is a leak? LNG is still considered a greenhouse gas and a contributor to global warming when you let it boil off into the atmosphere.
Can anyone explain how the LNG candle worked? If you have to get it super hot to ignite how are you making a candle from it?
The candle was not made from LNG, it was a normal paraffin candle I assume. They lighted it to demonstrate how much less residues the Natural gas' exhaust gases have compared to that paraffin candle.
despi kandi They said one candle was a natural gas candle.
I'd imagine all consumer gases would have an added odorant added and the candle could have been gas form with some kind of regulator. As for greenhouse gas, let's be real, its a huge oil company that has and will keep disputing global warming.
LNG Candle will work if you have more than 1000 °F ignition source plus the 5% to 15% oxygen ratio in the area. If you use a air butane torches where the flame temperatures up to approximately 1,430 °C (2,610 °F) surely will fire up, as they explain in the video that LNG vapors will only ignite in more than 1000 °F ignition source.
Why do you want the bad side. Everything has a negative side and you’ve to deal with it.
Fuel corporations trying to sell another unsustainable fuel... Good job ;) While all we have sustainable open-source fuel available - alcohol...
methane gas is liquefied at minus 162, ethane - 103, propane - 40,,,, they all come from wood fibre twrminally degraded in hydrocarbon moliculic structure.
What is Shell composed of?
that was so coll
Then why do LNG ships have NO SMOKING signs all over it hmmm?
LNG a strong greenhouse gas; true?
Yes, LNG is methane. And methane is a very strong ghg.
If directly in the atmosphere, methane is a strong greenhouse gas (which happens with cow farts for example) but in this case the gas is consumed and when the combustion occurs, it transform methane into carbon dioxyde, heat and water. Therefore, for equivalent energy production LNG combustion creates less greenhouse gases than oil. One very important aspect of natural gas is also the fact that it releases less thin particles than other fuels.
We use LNG fueled trucks at work. They're in the shop 50% of the time lol
I still think I'll chose to drink water over natural gas.
Reminds me of when they made the case to replace coal with petroleum.
100 years later, "Oops!"
What else would we use? You say they, like only certain people are using and taking advantage of oil and gas. We will always need fossil fuels. There’s is no substance on this planet that can come close to oil. Millions of products are made from oil. The only way we will advance energy sources like wind, solar, and battery technology is through investment which leads to greater research and development. But that takes money. The world’s economy is based on fossil fuels. This relentless demonization and over regulation of fossil fuels will only hurt that. Whether you like it or not civilization as we know it would cease to exist without oil and gas. Whatever crisis you think this planet is in due to fossil fuels will pale in comparison to a world without them. Facts. Look at what’s happening right now because of the extreme policies that have been implemented over the past year in regards to fossil fuels. It’s absolutely crazy and naïve to think we can go without fossil fuels. Everything comes from, or is a result of oil and gas. Everything. Without them, we’d be living in the 16th century and that’s not going to happen.
@@a-a-ron4679 I say "they" in reference to the custodians of Western Civilization/Modernization who make all these discoveries and decisions to popularize what they seem to think is right, consequences to the health of the planet is often at least decades after-thought. "We will always need fossil fuels". That's because it was decided for you long ago that that's the way to go. You're not a part of the cartel that commercialized the discovery of oil and if you weren't born to see things done this way, you'd have a different opinion. "The world's economy is based on fossil fuel", again, that decision was not made by the world. It's the European hegemony and their monolithic impositons that decide for the rest of the world.
For example, there are tribes on this earth that would never accept any values that are contrary to the balance of nature nor conceive the idea to commercialize and therefore overly exploit any type of natural resources in exchange for overly-valued (as determined by the west) pieces of paper known as fiat currency. Of course those tribes had to be attacked, conquered, enslaved and colonized by the Europeans for having too much concern for the preservation of nature over capitalist greed. You have apparently been indoctrinated to see those pro-nature ethnic tribes as nothing but primitive. However, they had the wisdom to live in harmony with nature rather than against it. They had the knowledge to keep things cold all summer long without electricity. They cured diseases without synthetic chemicals that create more problems than they solve, etc. And nothing they did was to the expense of the health of this planet.
Today, here we are talking about solving the fossil fuel problem by introducing another problem. It never ends
what about the fracking that is a huge part of this retrieval? So much they are not speaking about as usual
What's wrong with fracking? Oh besides powering your laptop to make dumb comments like this :D lol. Yay for fracking and unleashing trapped solar fossil energy from deep in the planet. Maybe it'll help us get into the solar system... you never know ;) (see spaceX).
You must like Lithium strip mining better.
hello im on my mom´s youtube account! is LNG in its liquid form drinkable
Technically speaking, yes - but that would be probably the last drink you'd have in your life. So, DO NOT drink it.
Now that's a clean burnin' fuel I tell ya h'wat.
“LNG has an impressive safety record” what’s impressive is that they would even want to obfuscate the obvious dangers of mishandled natural gas
shell is gonna shell
Propane butane is also flammable and combustible but most villages in the world use it for cooking without a second thought
Crushing a beautiful flower is a very fitting metaphor for the fossil fuel industry's effect on the environment.
Is that you Sheldon & Amy?
Holy ANDRONOGY !!
Commerce student here 🙂🙂
Is that Caitlyn Jenner?! Or Bruce Jenner
FREEDOM GAS!!!!
I'm not convinced that was LNG for all the demonstrations. Seems kinda dangerous. My guess is they used LN2 for the ones that didn't involve fire.
There's no way of easily getting LNG in a vat like that lol, unless they are near a terminal lol - and I doubt all their equipment is intrinsically safe. 100% they probably used liquid nitrogen
@@edhardy7210 i mean, they work for shell tho
It's LNG similar to CNG
what's...coal about lng
I was looking a video to cook meth, but instead I found this. Now I Will change muy goals.
Diversify your Portfolio and do both! 💰 💨
Oh dear....we forgot to say it explodes 🎉
she spit the marshmallow out of cam. lol
What’s cool about LNG? I see what u did there 😎
LNG, a way to ship natural gas, it is energy very costly, liquefaction and regasification, it produces about 4.1 kg of CO2 emissions per 1 kg of gas from well to whills (end funnel)...it will eventually need to be phased out of everyday use...Go for ne hydrogen economy, it has a future...
well its a good thing then that CO2 is extremely beneficial to life on Planet Earth! So this is a total win/win. Also I would highly recommend going back to coal and regular oil. I mean thanks to human brain power, capitalism and fossil fuels we were able to INVENT new coal scrubbing technologies which reduce any harmful emissions from coal plants by over 99%.
Also oil again produces a lot of CO2 which is great for the planet. Even the plankton love it and then feeds the entire food chain. Total win for humanity for unlocking all that trapped solar power trapped by photosynthesis from over 300 million years ago!
@@raffiliberty5722 You know there is a balance in the world. some CO2 goes int o the atmosphere, some sinks. but the problem is that we are putting a lot of carbon in the air that the world cannot sink at the same speed. More carbon means that more energy coming from the sun will be absorbed in the atmosphere, which in turn will lead to more inbalance- then biodivesity lost, extreme temperatures, increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events, floods, droughts, sea level rise, loss of agricultural land... And I recommend you to read about the consequences of extreme plankton population on the ocean (more carbon means more plankton)
@@basakturkmen9236 Here, the only website you should be checking out. They update it with ALL studies that constantly de-myth every claim made by these climate religion worshipers. You can question the sources all you want but you can't question the studies they cite.
Here's one on how increasing CO2 by humans is NOT linear increase into atmosphere absorption. This completely debunks what you are worried about. Plants not don't have to work so hard and lose so much water just to get a molecule of CO2. Plants are THRIVING, you should be ecstatic!
skepticalscience.com/co2-levels-airborne-fraction-increasing.htm
Cigarette heats up when smoked.. when someone is drawing air trough it.. try that and you have flames..
Are you sure LNG in this video is not.
Liquid Nitrogen Gas