iPad Pro Vs. AMD Threadripper 1950 Video Render Speed Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- This video shows a render speed comparison between the iPad Pro (gen3) running LumaFusion and an AMD Threadripper 1950 16 core PC running Adobe premiere Pro CC 2019.
Here is where got my ipad pro 12.9: amzn.to/2ErHmMX
Ipad pro 11 amzn.to/2GYHLYQ
Video edited on LumaFusion apple.co/2SvS5OY
#Paid link
#Commissions earned
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
Great comparison and amazing results! It looks that the Adobe premiere it's not well optimised not just the difference between hardware.
Thats exactly what it is. Kind of the reason im getting a MacBook pro with final cut pro.
Yeah, Adobe is notorious for it's software optimization. But the A12x is no match for the threadripper in raw CPU power.
Multi 100 Watt system vs Multi single Watt system.
The PC platform is doing something hugely wrong!
Not at all, it is just the difference between hardware encoding and software encoding, which can be toggled on PC too, plus the fact that there's like 5 iPads and 5000 different combinations in PCs
You got it all twisted.
Because the SOC desgin has all the parts mm's from each other (CPU,RAM,GPU). But the PC platform has all the parts multiple cm's from each other. This is one of the main reason the PC is using hundreds of watt's.
Transferring data multiple cm's to each part every nano seconds is a huge energy waste.
You will see in the coming future that ram will be moved into the CPU. This will boost the performance massively. Nvidia and AMD already have this model with HBM2 memory for their server GPU's.
And what new is coming to the SOC model is RISC-V (reduced instructions set computer) so less instructions will boost the performance even more.
@@N0N0111 Ohj okay I see you're totally speaking efficiencies and I spoke totally performance wise
But even efficiency wise, I don't think the the unified die makes a big difference, otherwise iGPUs would be the king of the hill and AMDs Vega and RX Cards would be ahead of NVidia.
Architecture matters a lot more and that is where ARM kicks in. That is about the end of it
PCs with x86 are a lot more versatile in terms of a user perspective and also from developer perspective and that freedom does come with inefficiencies
I am very impressed how my 2018 ipad pro provides much faster render time than my pc with i7-7700k + gtx 1080
How much faster would you say? I'm thinking about doing my video editing and photo editing exclusively on iPadOS but need to know if it's worth the jump from Winodows.
jusst bought an ipad pro 2020 12.9 256gb because of this video... Also tested it head to head with my Ryzen 3800x using vegas pro and guess what? iPad pro wins haha
When your freinds 999 metal lithium slab is faster than your multi thousand dollar pc
SUS
Could you just save your files on an external hard drive?
You must not have a decent GPU in your Threadripper system. I encode to h.265 4k24 faster than realtime on my system, and I've only got 6 cores (using both intel quicksync for decompression and nvenc for compression).
There might be something I'm missing but I have a Geforce 1080. The 1080 does add some hardware acceleration.
@@Somecooltech1 Only if you ensure Hardware Acceleration is checked.
The reason I mention it is because the iPad has hardware acceleration baked into it, so comparing it to a general-purpose CPU without that kind of acceleration, even a threadripper, doesn't seem like a fair comparison. H.265 is only possible at those speeds with a dedicated encoding block, so you might want to double-check.
cool that is a new way of review in ipad pro
What ipad are you using in this video 11 or 12.9?
Nice video! Aww yeah
h8 the background music. Been watching you or years. why are you adding background music?
ok, but CPU and GPU accelerated video compression (like what the ipad used) are NOT the same, the quality of the video could differ a lot depending on the settings...
And you can also use your PC´s gpu to compress video, like intel´s quicksync, but the quality is just enough for youtube, not for archival o serious work
Wow!if only it ran Mac OS. I would jump on that