Tesla will have driver monitoring before level 5 | George Hotz and Lex Fridman
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 окт 2020
- Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • George Hotz: Hacking t...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- Four Sigmatic: foursigmatic.com/lex and use code LexPod to get up to 40% & free shipping
- Decoding Digital: appdirect.com/decoding-digital
- ExpressVPN: expressvpn.com/lexpod and use code LexPod to get 3 months free
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
CONNECT:
- Subscribe to this RUclips channel
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridmanpage
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman 
Наука
![College Football 25 Road To Glory - Transfer Portal & First Team All-American [FRESHMAN YEAR]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U8UYgoKneCo/mqdefault.jpg)
I think driver monitoring makes sense from an FSD perspective. When watching the driving behavior of an individual, knowing what they're doing when a decision is made is paramount to separating deliberate choices from poor habits influencing input. If a vehicle swerves suddenly and the driver is looking down at their phone, you can correlate that the input was not based on a decision the driver made from something on the road, but was actually human error as a result of distraction.
I’m so appreciative for this channel 🙏🏽
Me too!!
Nothing is force fed here. I choose to pay attention here because I connect with it to my core
His comment of excessive alerts reminds me of the airline industry's excessive alerts in prior years that did lead to certain situations of pilots tuning out the warnings.
Driver monitoring works if there is a driver. Driverless Robo Taxis will have occupant monitoring. Customers will accept this if they want to use service.
@@Daniela-pr7rz the owner shouldn't be responsible if someone destroys their car.
Teslas have driver monitoring even if the camera remains off. It knows if the driver is paying attention by monitoring the LACK of interaction with steering and pedals. It could ramp up and lessen the check rate depending on interactions in recognised driving events and get an overall feel for the probability that the human driver is paying attention.
Agreed, as CEO you have to exude confidence that your finite amount engineering effort is spent on the right thing at the right time.
Amazing, thanks so much for your work
Love the series. Finally some youtube with a little intellectual depth
Very informative. Thank you.
the Tesla Model 3 and the Tesla Model Y always had a driver monitoring camera from the biginning.
My experience in our Model 3 FSD behavior is the opposite. In town, in traffic, it's very confident. As long as other cars are around it can go 10 minutes between warnings, but on a open road by itself, it can be every 10 seconds. It sucks on long trips in low traffic areas.
its speed based..so higher speed on the highway it will nag more often. things can go wrong quicker on the highway. I barely find myself using FSD..maybe once the new rewrite goes public ill end up using it a lot more. we have potholes around here and its too hard to disengage it constantly
@@rtsstream I'm not sure about that. In a city with traffic like Vegas, it goes much longer between warnings. Anyway, it's old and irrelevant now. Just waiting for the release of the new 4D SW. It looks very promising.
I think there is a significant chance that FSD Hardware 4 (or maybe a future version) will include a new inside camera array that enables driver monitoring. And it will become mandatory to have access to FSD (Tesla will upgrade for free). Either Tesla reaches level 4 FSD (and therefore takes legal responsibility for the driving) or they will continue to operate at Level 2+, putting the responsibility on the owner, and eventually requiring (by law?) an active driver monitoring system.
Operating systems introduced the concept of over-the-air updates.
Comma 3 is amazing. One of the best purchases I’ve ever made.
If your goal is autonomous self driving, is driver monitoring not a distraction from that goal? I can understand why it might be desirable in the short term, for testing systems that approach an autonomous system. Would those resources not have a greater impact being deployed in pursuit of your primary goal. Surly driver monitoring is a feature of a dev/debug or beta version of a self driving car and not future mass production models? By focusing on driver monitoring in commercial vehicles, are we like some of our early 20th century counter parts, trying to hold on to our horses and not fully committing to the transition to self driving?
I disagree, you could make the same argument about lane keep assist, or cruise control, like ideally you don't need driver monitoring but we don't yet have level 5 autonomous systems therefore before we get there it is prudent and wise from a legal aspect to have driver monitoring, but you also must make it in a way that isn't annoying and doesn't piss people off otherwise it defeats the purpose.
I would rather have my driving-assist car monitor me.
So that, for example, if it is unsure it should brake, and sees I am distracted at that moment, it does the safer thing.
Tesla not doing this is the biggest head-scratcher me. They must have been overconfident they would solve FSD fast.
I’m just curious, what about speed limits and highway speed enforcement nobody drive the speed limit when a policeman pulled you over can you blame the AI system?
Looking at over all of the stores talking about what's the point of having this technology in the beginning I thought it was very cool to have a self-driving car but now the more I think about it is like what do we need it for it just so we can show off to our friends they look I'm not holding this steering wheel that's pretty much the only reason other than that I think it's really stupid idea and I'm 25 years old?
Welp, I guess no more shooting H while driving!
Put tape over the camera lol
Damn I’m pretty bummed out about it to bro!
@@ilikebigbytes4371 exactly what I thought! How else am I supposed to get road head without some pencil neck whacking off to his AI road head models?
@@a1-user yeah, we don't need a camera or mic in our cars....... 🤦♂️
Most underrated channel
How about adding the guest info/bio/intro on the vid description ?
How hard is it to understand we want some privacy in our lives? Do we have to be taped at all times, everywhere?
As long as other people's lives are on the line, and you want want FSD, then absolutely Yes.
If you fully take the responsibility yourself, then no.
01:00 Apparently these guys have never had a deer run out in front of their car on a long isolated highway. I can understand, since many people who do - don't survive the process. I am just one of the lucky ones. You can bet that I am very vigilant, especially popping the top of a hill on chilled nights about 1am. Because you have less than a second to recognize and respond to a bounding 300 pound brick wall.
Driver monitoring is pointless. Makes sense to do it today but down the road it will be pointless. They will need full car monitoring for the taxi service.
Driver monitoring is one of the baby steps toward the societal and legislative acceptance of FSD; aka, you sit in the backseat the car does all the driving.
IF your goal is, the car driving itself, why would you focus on monitoring the driver???
The goal of self driving car, there will not be a driver.
There should be a bridging between humans driving and full self automation, which is driver monitoring
I love these
Yeah they really are great
Is it possible that if and when Tesla achieves level 5 and perfects it, you don't even need a steering wheel or human driver. So, what is the relevance of driver monitoring in that scenario?
None probably. Driver monitoring is needed for the transition towards level 5.
Interesting!
I love crazy geohot
Man u guys talk trippy
I've got a solution. Get rid of cars. Redesign towns so that everything is within walking distance. Have trains connect towns. This is a win-win-win. A win for safety. A win for health (more walking). And a win for community.
@@pflernak We can't allow COVID to dictate all our decisions. Find way to make it safe,
He was right.
I think I relate to Elon musk's pov
The thing is that driver monitoring is taking the easy way out
If a company goes driver monitoring, then they will further improve that, when they should be improving the fundamental performance of the car.
Really reducing the risk
@@Daniela-pr7rz My take is: what Tesla has is enough. Why add more materials, cost, and effort into each vehicle when it will be completely unnecessary when FSD is released, which Tesla is very bullish on. How many times have there been accidents because the steering wheel nag wasn't enough? People that "fall asleep" are not new to Teslas. They're either intentionally tricking the system (which they likely would find a way to do with the camera too), or are just faking it for views. I really don't think there's a problem here. Remember that the reason Tesla's current driver monitoring is how it is is because it does not require any hardware specifically for driver monitoring. The motor that controls the steering column in Autopilot can sense extra resistance through specific software alone. Therefore, when the cars are FSD, nothing is vestigial.
George should really give it a try lending his voice for cartoon characters. His voice would be really great! and no offence behind the suggestion
Due to regulations Driver Monitoring will become mandatory in 2022.
Love me some Geohot
Is lex the new JRE?
Better
Its like Joe rogan without the dmt
Better because he’s actually smart! 😂👅
Naw, Tim Dillon is
Lex saw you Rogen a couple of times. Love the channel and all the topics you talk about! I play guitar to seen you got skills in that to!! Wish we could grab a beer and shoot the shit lol!
I don't want any cams inside my car.
4:24 Thumbnail
Great talk.
If a driver, say a man for arguments sake and ease of pronouns, has both hands on the wheel and his eyes are on the road, open straight road, what would trigger a warning?
If the driver is smiling, would he be more or less likely to get a warning?
Humanity can assess risk? How did 2020 happen?
lol
Lol plenty of humans can they just tend to be intelligent enough not to run for public office
5:40 I think about me as a "human"
yeah right lex, we all believe you
This guy seems off, I am 27% sure he is a bot. Have you seen the hbo tv show raised by wolves.
Driver monitoring is obviously the right way to go if drivers are behind the wheel. But Tesla is aiming for robotaxis where there I no driver behind the wheel. Therefore right from the beginning, he is aiming for robotaxi level perfection.
This guy is a human robot
I like driving... (just saying)
U say us humans alot
All robots do
If this guy is so brilliant how come EVERYONE is beating a path to his door?
Incorrect
Elon is constantly trying to perfect the feedback loop so he can be less wrong. What do you mean he doesn't want to admit publicly when he is wrong?
Tesla will have driver monitoring to get to level 3.
Get a casual dark gray blazer. Black suits are not worn in offices.
Conform!
Worry about yourself buddy
People just want lvl 5 anything else sucks there are millions of people that cant go near a car without lvl 5
@chinese knees people who cant physically drive the blind etc its lvl 5 or nothing
Driver monitoring is focusing on the wrong thing.
focusing? it is so easy, it is already done (in openpilot)
You don't need driver monitoring for a system that is engineered to eventually be a better driver than the human sitting in the front seat.
It's irrelevant
In the last episode with George Hotz, his main point was that Tesla (or anyone else on the table) is currently unable to present a viable solution for weird, underexplored edge cases (not covered well with the existing data) and will not for quite some time.
To address your initial point, driver monitoring is necessary because while AutoPilot will drive better than humans do in most normal cases, the possibility of failing catastrophically is not eliminated.
@@yunho-cho ok but than you can say the system is level 4 or 5. Max level 3
@@yunho-cho I would agree that it is nessecery for a vehicle that is only ever driving when a human is in the car. Tesla has been designing autopilot to not only drive itself with a person in the car, but also completely on its own. Like driving you to work in the morning and then driving itself back to your house. In that situation you cannot depend on the driver. The system needs to be robust enough to drive completely on its own. I believe that is what Tesla is working towards and from their latest beta test videos it look like they are quite close. I think they underestimate Elon Musk.
If I have someone riding with me in a car while having an interesting conversation, I am on autopilot while I'm focused on the conversation. I even get lost when I divert my attention back to where I''m at on the road and don't immediately know where I'm at. No AI system can do that.
Why would you want an AI system that’s able to be distracted from its task? This is counterintuitive, the AI is not human
@@dareobasade2696 You have to think that our MIND ( AI system with a Voice ) is much more sophisticated than the AI's that human hands have built recently but our MIND is in fact, comparable to an AI system that speaks. The MIND of a MAN ( male and female ) is how life is experienced. There is nothing outside the MIND.
Can I join his discord ? Haha
Calculating human risk otherwise known as
She'll be right
Haha are you a fan of the yt channel how to dad
Find a small group of drivers that are, statistically, always paying attention and have them quickly minimize the number of driving regrets; problem solved plus no need to collect unfruitful data from inattentive drivers.
Inside cams are for robotaxi, tesla is skipping L4. Waymo is a dead end
Tesla will never achieve Level 5