The AMD Fury - A Fantastic Failure!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2024
- Hello and Welcome to another Budget Builds video, where today we're taking a look at a much awaited video. My very own AMD Fury, a card that has a reputation; one both good, and also pretty damn bad. Still join me today as we take a look at both sides of the argument, and see some suprising performance in a range of titles.
Intro - 0:00
The Specs? - 0:18
What was the AMD Fury? - 1:50
The Negatives - 3:00
The Positives - 5:00
Gaming Benchmarks - 6:58
3D Mark Performance - 12:10
AMD VCE Performance - 13:37
Handbrake and Thermals - 14:29
The Final Verdict - 15:27
Music
Sims 1 - Building 1
TTD - OST
Simcity 3000 - Building
Why not become a Patreon you get to:
-Support the Channel in an Amazing Way
-Get Previews to New Videos
-Exclusive/Unfinished Content
Patreon: / budgetbuilds
Twitter: / budget_builds_
Twitch: / budgetbuildsoff. .
Second Channel: ruclips.net/channel/UCocy...
Specs:
CPU: Ryzen R7 3700X
GPU: My AMD R9 Fury
RAM: 32GB DDR4 RAM
OS: Windows 10 
Наука
There seems to be a degree of concern regarding the HBM and Thermal Paste. Please do not worry as it was fully covered by Thermal Paste, and I can confirm temps are nice and low.
Already available in 4k 60 fps right now :P.
The one man who makes a video as an excuse to clean his graphics card 🤣
This man went on a passion rant about power usage.
I had a fury myself. I used it for a while and it sucked in gta V. I bought a 980 Ti with the money I got from selling the Fury. I had the same model fury that boosted to 1050mhz and could barely OC it to 1100mhz. It was a very warm card as well I should mention but its a good card in general. Indeed the vram is a limitation tho.
Have you checked if it can unlock to a fury X? I used to have a fury and I had heaps of fun tinkering with it!
I never actually heard the phrase "multi-billion pound company" been uttered before even though it is entirely logical. I'm not American either so it's kinda weird.
And uttered with such anger and frustration.
i read this b4 watching the video and i was thinking "how is a company heavy" lmao
@@dhanajon5528 in Chinese we say mega corp as: big asshead company.
That doesn't translate well
When the graphics card started moving I thought it was falling into the water had a mini heart attack there 🤣
good it wasnt just me
Oh my god same jesus lol
same! I own this card, and it's so big it always looks like it's going to fall out of the PCIE slot.
more cooling!
Same I immediately came to.the comments to see if I was insane
Budget builds complaining about the Fury’s 275W of TDP
Me with my Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse with 280W: *sweats nervously
The RTX 3090 has a TDP of up to 500 watts (EVGA FTW3 Ultra) and no one is complaining :-D If 280W is to high for your liking you should try undervolting+overclocking, my Vega 64 Nitro+ never goes above 220W and reaches higher clocks than stock.
You undervolted it yet?
Me with Gigabyte Vega 56
*sympathetic sweating intensifies
Me on the Fury's OC (300w) bios with power limit cranked:
Me: Looks at my pc
Radeon VII: Hey
you took the card out, and when outside its still steaming mad! :P
This is the Real Reason BBO is still using it, how many other GPUs have this feature??? None 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Vega is exactly the same. A bit of undervolting and it does really well, plus you can find them dirt cheap because of their bad rep.
Nope they are 2-3x more expensive here!
I sold my GTX 1070 a couple of months ago and got a used Vega 64 Nitro+ for nearly the same price. In some titles it outperforms the 1070 by a long shot with UV+OC, but many newer games run unexpectedly bad. The raw performance is there but it does not translate to higher fps somehow, maybe due to bad drivers.
@@neutrida5091 I've seen them as low as £190 in the UK, with prices usually hovering around £230 on sites like eBay (V56). You get the most out of them by slapping a V64 bios on and undervolting the core, then overclocking the HBM.
With "here" I mean Austria, Vega 64 are 300€ and 56 200€. I bought a R9 Fury ROG Strix for 100€ I am currently waiting for it.
@@neutrida5091 Servus aus Niederbayern, ist der Markt bei euch in Österreich echt so schlecht aufgestellt? Eine Vega 64 bekommst du hier ohne Probleme für 250 € oder weniger mit ein wenig Verhandeln auf Kleinanzeigen und das schon seit längerer Zeit.
Budget-Builds: “Don’t buy this, despite it being so good.”
Me with an HD5830: *laughs in low performance and outdated drivers*
Terascale moment.
I have a 5870 ik that pain
5830 was my first actually decent GPU... That I got in 2014 on eBay for $30. Honestly it was great, but driver support... Yeahh even then it wasn't good
Me with a GTX 650 :/
I had a HD 5450, I knew that pain.
But now I have a GTX 1080.
I use a fury nano in my gf’s gaming rig and when I was testing it I was ASTONISHED at the performance you got out of it. Very similar to my old 980 Ti. It’s interesting to see how the technology progressed with Vega, since I daily drive a Vega 64, which is another shockingly performing card in 2020 with a few tweaks.
How bizzare, I have a Vega 64 in my rig but a full phat Fury rather than a nano in my gf's gaming rig :')
I will admit, I was shocked at how good the Fury is too, especially considering the fact that when I bought it it was roughly the price of a (then still current) 1050 Ti
@@ProfessorArcticPine I was looking for a fury X but couldn't find one for what I'd consider reasonable money, but found a screaming deal ($120 shipped) on the nano. I was more shocked by my vega if anything bc I got my Strix for $220 and with an uv at stock clocks and 1100hbm it performs identically to my colleagues' 2060 Super in the games we play together.
Amd cards seem to age a lot better for some reason. You'll likely keep seeing tiny performance increases as new drivers roll out.
Jude Price Eh idk about that. A gpu is only as good as the support it gets and AMD is not the best for that. One thing that Nvidia does well is drivers and legacy card support. I was on the Nvidia site the other day and was blown away how there were modern driver updates to super old gpu’s. Last I had checked AMD did not treat it’s older cards kindly. Just kinda abandoned them.
@@Yomom12388 yeha but when the rx 570 came out it was barely faster than the 1050ti and now it beats the gtx 1060 3gb definitely and nearly gets in reach of the 6gb model
As a proud owner of an R9 Nano, I appreciate that this honest review of the Fury lineup exists.
6:09 oh my gosh the raytracing
Remembered when RNien Fury X got released? That thing comes with 120mm AiO by default lol.
Cries in current GPU Fury X.
@@schweepy_g REEEWRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEHHEEEEEEEEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE STRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
AMD fanboy: yea but the fan is quiet
@@LocoMe4u LOL truer words never spoken. But seriously first one had bad coil whine had to RMA or was gonna be committed to a room with padded walls. Second one is really quiet but I did change the fan too.
that coolermaster AIO is pretty good tho, quiet and effective especially if you replace the fan. i've also used a fury x for a long time, it stays at around 50 celsius under load
I've been running one since roughly December 2015 and now the bearings in the pump are going bad :( it still works but it makes a faint grinding noise intermittently. Sucks but it's served me well the past 5 years.
Pentium 4 + 8400GS = Epic Video
You owned a Fury?! A man of my own heart❤️
HBM is really neat even if it doesn't make the GPU objectively better than the competition.
It looks cool atleast. Which is certainly something.
I kinda wish AMD would release a BigNavi with HBM2E. The small size it could be built into, would be insane!
(Two vega64 here! )
Agreed, HBM always seemed like a glimpse into the future, even if it (thus far) hasn't proven to be. I purchased an R9 Nano just to own what I felt is a piece of history. Hopefully we haven't seen the last of the technology.
@@Boborjan1986 If I remember correctly, CDNA2 does have HBM2 rather than RDNA2 GDDR6. But maybe RDNA3 might goes back the HBM2.
@@Boborjan1986 RDNA2 doesn't really need fast VRAM for gaming purposes. AMD learned from its mistakes with GCN which was much more compute focused. RDNA2 can make due with slower memory than Ampère for gaming purposes.
I'm not surprised that the thermal paste still looked pretty good when you disassembled the card, Sapphire make the best AMD based cards hands down.
Me too I was like wtf😂😂😂
Well, they are the closest AMD partners, they are to AMD what EVGA is to nVIDIA(not saying PNY, though)
Aren't XFX good too?
@@PaperReaper XFX has a big, BIG Achilles’ heel they haven’t been able to sort out: their fans suck ass. They break and fail sooner than on other cards.
That and they design some poor custom models, like the FatBoy, the RS RX480 and the THICC RX5700XTs.
I’ve yet to see a badly-designed Sapphire model for years. Ever since the 400 series they’ve upped their quality game.
@@JackBandicootsBunker ah, got it. What are the most reliable vendors besides sapphire for AMD?
The nano was an absolute beast, particularly for ITX builds.
Since it was my main GPU from 2013 to this year and it served me well I'd love the see a video on the 7970. It was also the last time AMD was on top when it came to GPUs.
7970 is ok low-med 1080p gaming card for today games. But it is outdated with support for DX12 so newer games will not work with that card.
@@IgorBozoki1989 it has dx12 support
@@yournemesis192 Only up to feature level 11.0. It's total BS I know but titles like Death Stranding won't work on it.
@@livingthedream915 weird considering it runs on PS4 with a cut down 7870 chip
@@yournemesis192 There were different versions of all of those chips man, the 7870 was reborn as the r7 270x (just a rebrand that was still dx12 11.0) and finally with the r7 370x it was moved up to feature level dx12 12.0. Yes it's stupid, AMD should have moved all their lower spec cards up to that but they were being cheap as hell. First 3 sentences should have the info you're looking for www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-hd-7950.c307
The card is smoking in the outside shots. Is it so hot? :D
Nah that was my tea being used to prop it up for the B-Roll.
@@BudgetBuildsOfficial The most British of props
Budget-Builds Official THATS SO BRITISH AND I LOVE IT
I’m also British and I do the exact same thing sometimes lmao
Love your channel btw, your videos are so educational and entertaining that I love watching them.
Yes definitely, rant video would be a bloody brilliant change from your usual calm delivery.
I remember buying these a year or two for around $80-90 a pop on eBay. Sadly...people caught on about the price to performance these offered.
The Nano was the real jewel in the crown from that generation. Same core configuration as the Fury X but at a TBP of 175 W and in an ITX suitable form factor. It runs about 10% lower clocks to get there, but the top 10% of clocks on these cards are the ones that give you the least performance. I was using one as my main until recently, and it performs somewhere in the middle between an RX 580 and a GTX 1660 Super/ti. As you say, it's just about picking the right settings. Despite the tiny heat sink and single fan it never got above 74c. Probably my sentimental favourite of all the cards I've owned.
I made the jump from a Fury Nitro OC to a Vega 56 Pulse in 2018 and I was very happy with it. I loved my Fury, such a beautiful, quiet card. But the 8GB Vega 56 is one I loved even more. In some games it was 60% faster (due to VRAM honestly) and I love maxxing out textures. Plus its much MUCH better tessellation performance helped.
Me too. Fury Nitro to Pulse V56 to Pulse RX 5700XT (all really amazing cards).
Nobody seems to want to buy the Fury or V56 off me, so they are both stuck in a cupboard for now.
Shame!!!
Great video again. I'm sort of in the same boat as you with my GTX 1060 6GB. It plays all the games I want it to and I don't need to lower settings on games any lower than the high pre-set. So I'm the same as there's no compelling reason for me to upgrade from this yet as it still does what I need it to and nothing else on the market is enough of a jump, like you say in the video.
I feel the same with an rx580 8gb
That's the right way to go about it imo. No need for upgrading if you don't need to, if you do it's mindless consumerism.
I feel bad for the people using 3GB versions of the 1060, it's like having a DDR4 GT 1030 compared to the GDDR5 one
@@QuackCola I'm on the same boat, I have a 1070 but want a little more since I want to do more high framerate gaming without lowering settings, and occasionally play at 4K 60hz on my TV.
0:27 the water right under the PCIe pins is giving me anxiety.
Since it is not powered, you can pretty much wash it together with the dishes, as long as you dry it out properly afterwards.
yea i sat here refreshing my sub feed what are u gonna do about it
people be out there watching F1 while i'm here watching F5
@@NuclearTopSpot GOD that was good lmfao
I don't usually keep notifications on but for this channel i am happy to do...love your content man...
So I have this horrible banding like at 8:10 sometimes too ingame or Netflix, is there a way to fix this, or is this purely compression by the media source in the dark levels of colors? It's really annoying to me!
Ah, the Vega. Got mine for 250€ around a year ago, it performs at the level of of GTX 1080 (with undervolting and overclocking), I think it was a great deal!
Hey all, been into console's up till recent. Inspired by these vids to get into PC gaming.. I have a ASUS -K52J, I picked up on sale in 2011. Says it has a GE Force 310M. Would it be worth fixing and trying to run older games on today? Was it ok even then? Only really know about current gear and spec and that is limited. Looking for some advice? Thanks.
My 2nd backup card :) My main one is GTX 1080 Ti. But soon i will replace it with RX 6800XT. Fury is solid 1080p card for today games.
18:18 *My heart skipped alot of beats once I realised that the GPU was so close to that water.*
Just discovered the channel and wow what a brilliant video!! I like how you mentioned that high end/up to date hardware is not always necessary, I mean lately a lot of people are going crazy and spending a LOT of money on their RTX 3090 setups when in reality, you can still play comfortably enough with much cheaper hardware.. I'm still rocking with my RX 580 and I don't have plans to replace it any time soon..
I have a Fury X, and this video resonates with me. Great video as always!
Hey there Brother!
Can you also review AMD Radeon R9 290? I have an HIS stock model. Wondering what you think of it.
love your content , keep up the good work it makes my day to see one of your videos
Hi, could it work with windows 8 and 14.4 drivers?
Will you sometime do a video about the ATI Radeon 9250?
What spray did you use to clean the card?
I wanted one of these so bad but as you said the cost rarely made sense. Still holds a soft spot in my heart!
yeah me too, the performance was top notch if you knew how to stay within the VRAM limit (easy) but omg the prices were insane
What's the name of the program used to tune the GPU specifications? Thanks!!!
Do you mean the one which he used to undervolt it?
Eh. even though the cards still expensive for it's age and value, I myself might probably try getting one for collectors purposes at some point. Also cause it'd fit my secondary PC's purpose quite well. Still gonna wait for a drop while I think about it. Always wanted one these cards since i was 17. Also glad to finally see you do a vid on your card finally. I was probably one of the lads in the discord askin every other week or month for the past 3 years haha.
What are your undervolt settings?
what solution do you use to clean thermal paste off?
What program or settings did you use to undervolt your R9 Fury? I got the exact same model and I'm really considering undervolting it, since the power draw is insanely high for no reason at all.
You can do it in Radeon software. Just right click in windows, go into Radeon software, go to the “tuning” tab, check GPU tuning and manually lower voltages at the stock clocks, while testing for stability in unigine heaven or an intensive game you like to play
@@lonniemurray4742 much thanks for the quick guide!
Nice dude, i am still using the same fury i got some years ago, got damaged by a voltage spike and had to fix it, but it stills works good, with a decent undervolt even better
If the fury had 8gb or even 6gb of vram it would be an insane card. It reminds me a lot of the Radeon VII.
It would also cost twice as much atm
@@airshaped Yeah, but you can't design a graphics' card around 'what will the implications be during a massive supply crunch?' If you do that you end up with the 6500xt
wondering what you spray on the die to clean it ?? As its you i imagine its a very cheap efficient way to clean the die
What had you sprayed while cleaning off the thermal compound? It looked terrifying to me as I'm always worried pushing compound into places where it's not supposed to be! 😛
Did you test this card on linux? I'm wondering if the experience would be better or worse.
Volvo 480 - Most fun car I've ever owned.
Just need to ask. Did you just take the card outside after you've used it? Or from where is all that steam in the background of the card, how cold is it outside and what did you do with the card before taking it out? 0:44-0:51 This is where I saw the steam.
It's my cup of tea behind the GPU...
13:10 whats with the Volvo 480?
I remember drooling over this card when it came out. But my 960 served me well!
How is the performance with latest drivers? I got my hands on a Fury and it doesn't seem to perform as well as it should.
You can find these on Ebay sometimes for dirt cheap. They aren't bad at all for the price I paid $75.
So do you plan on picking up a 6800 or 6800XT?
Jeez, I have this same card. I had tons of WHEA uncorrectables this year, you think it was caused by the drivers? By the way, I don't know if you faced this, but mine still (as in for a few years now) keeps the fans off even on video encoding. I have to set a profile for every new game I play, otherwise it goes to 70-75c and stays there with the fans off(!). I really have no idea why, it's been this way since I think 19.2 (at least since then, I had afterburner with a custom profile before then so it might have handled the fans itself).
That's a feature of the card. It should idle with the fans off. Upto a temperature of around 55°C where fans kick in.
It shouldn't get anywhere near that hot. That's what mine runs at under full load in Furmark. It could be bad thermal paste. But I doubt it.
Might be worth a DDU and Reinstall?
@@BudgetBuildsOfficial It "survived" this behavior after a few OS reinstalls this year, I really can't tell what would cause it. I know the temps on this card are good, up to around 2017 it never even broke 65 on anything (and kept pretty quiet doing so). It could be that the thermal pads are dry now, but that's really no explanation as to why the fans "refuse" to spin unless I force them to. I think I'll start digging in the settings this weekend.
Can you make a video about undervolting-overclocking the Rx580/480?
I got a fury nano for not a whole lot of money. I absolutely love it.
I’ve seen one on the local market for a decent price, wonder if I should buy it?
Was this recorded before the Big Navi launch?
My R9 Fury just makes me excited for the RX 6800. Would you believe they have the same amount of memory bandwidth?
Love the way you stabilized the card for the first few shots, a hot cup of tea--
IIRC, this architecture was the last to support analogue DVI, which means a 390x is the best card you can get that supports VGA and thus CRT monitors.
Are you sure it's native VGA inside the GPU and not just via a dedicatd chip on the graphics card? If the latter is the case you'd get the exact same result by using external DVI-, HDMI- or DP-to-VGA adapters.
@@armorgeddon I don't really know about that, I just know at least one of the DVI ports is VGA compatible.
So the RX 6800 XT came out. Will you be getting one?
Had to come back again for this video. Now that i have a newer card that runs better, I have to say that AMD was definitely onto something with the fury cards. If they wouldve worked on tessalation, the HBM memory and the overvolting that they tend to do, they could've made a second version of the fury to completely destroy Nvidia in a ton of aspects.
I see that the HBCC support that came to vega 56/64 never came to the fury and fury xd... Sad ... And why did not your fury come with the Hitachi graphite thermal pad ? It will eliminate the problems of thermals more than a high end viscous thermal paste ... What kind of thermal paste and pads you are using on your card btw ?
Will this card run on a 2013 core i5? With 16gb of ddr3 ram or will it be a bottle neck?
It's newer and was high end at the time I don't think it will bottleneck that
@@seanonraet8327 thank you
Haven't finished the video and It's already amazing 😎
my temperature is 71 ° is normal with new thermal paste?
Wow! you have the exact same specs as me! I just got a 3700x, and am planning to upgrade my build to the 3070 or 6800 when they become available.
still can't get a damn 3070
What's the NVIDIA equivalent of the r9 Fury ? something like the GTX 96/7/80 or the GTX 105/6/7/80? Seems like the R9 is a nice card.
980 for r9 fury
980ti for r9 fury x
last competitive card? Sorry I don't get that one (I am not so acquainted with PCs)... Isn't the RX 570 / 580 / 590 (a later card family I think) legendary, in terms they work well even today?
Isn't the current line of cards rather competitive?
The RX470,480 were great cards when they were released but they were midrange options only.
The RX500 series performed 1/2fps better but generally just served to be rebranded power hogs. Even the RX590 was just an RX480 on 12nm.
Vega 56 and 64 were okay but against Nvidia they didn’t do much for AMDs high end.
The fury was the last real time AMD could compete with high end Nvidia with no issues.
Was that a video editor software? What was it?
Serif Movie Plus X6.... It's quite old now. But can still do what I need it to do.
@@BudgetBuildsOfficial I never got the reply notification. I am re watching many of your older videos and saw this reply. Thank you, even though it's been 2 years now. I was going to say I doubt you are still using it, then I remember I am still using Vegas 16 and 17.
Am I just imagining or was there smoke coming out from the graphic card at 0:30 - 0:50 ?
What is the current state of R9 fury drivers? Got lucky on an ebay deal, got it for £122 but wanna know if I should avoid getting the most recent driver? (Posted during GPU shortage for any of you internet historians)
Current drivers which are WHQL Certified are working beautifully, great deal there especially right now.
Typing this from my main rig, still running an R9 Nano on Linux, and i can say from experience that I have no issues running anything at 3440x1440. Love this card !
My RX480(Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB) despite being still one of "potential black screen" cards still does me fine!(although i still need to upgrade to AM4 platform from Socket 1155, and Windows 10 is sometimes an arse..) I'm still thinking about undervolting it but so far i didn't notice any issues with standard/auto tuning AMD's Adrenalin software is giving(nor any driver related issue . I might upgrade to something like RX 5500 XT or Vega 64(because weirdly enough 64 is cheaper than 56 here but there is still GTX 1070 Ti to consider in the whole mix).
Anyway it was interesting vid!
wait, you have a 4k monitor and play games past 60fps? do you have one of those super expensive 4k monitors that go above 60htz? if not, you're locked into 60fps no matter the resolution and no matter what fps the game says its running on. i did not know this either when i got my 4k monitor. if i had, i probably would have settled for 144p 1ms >100htz monitor instead.
My main monitor is 1440p 160Hz. There are also advantages to playing beyond the refresh rate of your monitor. Associated mostly with latency.
@@BudgetBuildsOfficial i didn't know just how important monitors are and that it's not something to cheap out on when i got my low-cost 4k monitor. being locked in to 60fps is fine for a lot of games- but i've heard others say that very high fps and fast response times is much more pleasing than 4k,60fps,4ms response time of most lower-cost 4k monitors.
Iirc amd actually never called the fury/fury x/nano the "overclocking dream", they were talking about the water cooler on the fury x
G'day BBO,
Loved the video, Although Not putting out an image I still have my Sapphire R9 270XToxic, it was my second GPU, I still have my first too, it is a Gigabyte GTX260OC (it is still working in my XP PC),
I know it is a reasonable performance comparison between GPUs as it is an ongoing consideration after purchase but except for my RX550 I've never bothered to check power consumption for any of my GPUs I have bought for gaming,
The only reason I did check the RX550 is I was seeing how little power usage was running with my Athlon200GE,
I built this as a silly experiment to see what was the 'Cheapest New Gaming PC' I could build with a Real GPU
, I was so impressed with the Athlon it is now my HTPC,
I can't remember the GPU OC but I had the 200GE to 4GHz@1.41v (it's daily setting is now 3.8GHz@1.3v), with the OC Running CB20 & Furmark together I almost got to 150W for whole PC
4:00 difficult to say if this was due to the hw, driver or engine, but in any case: Do not install a new driver the month it gets released. As a side note, you similarly need to wait for a month or so to get an idea of how better or worse it is. Did you install that driver the day after it was released?
There was a solid 4-5 Months of Driver instability on ALOT of AMD Cards during the early 2020 releases.
Been thinking about getting a third one, might do it after this
4:07 dude just casually soaking the card gave me anxiety!!
Staggering. You actually mentioned the going rate price of a bit of computer kit. Don't want to jinx it but have a thumbs up.
Still using my Fury as well, I actually have two but crossfire is dead so I just use one. Testing this card with settings appropriate for it was a really good idea, people think it's slower than it actually can be, just because there are a few settings that make more of a difference on it than on other cards.
You're right about these cards going up in price tho, it's really odd. In 2019 I snagged one for for just 95$ and not as a one off but there were a bunch of other cards for around that price, now they are more like 150$ locally. Drivers were also definitely a problem before the whole bad drivers for Navi situation blew up around Feburary, since then I haven't had a single problem with drivers and it seems that whatever they did fixed some of the issues on Fiji as well.
4Gb also hasn't been a problem for me, for whatever thats worth given that i dont really play that many modern games. But ye all and all im happy with my card too, it's not gonna be worth to upgrade from it until the around 200$ cards finally get refreshed, it's been the same performance tier there for a while.
Well, that's something I need to try now with my RX 580. I never even thought about undervolting it until now.
Radeon VII supposed to be successor of every past Radeon line ups
Wondering how this GPU would do on Modded drivers.
Love your videos. My kind of hardware. I always buy a generation behind. Just picked up a new 5700xt for £278. Upgraded my RX590. Paired it with my trusted Ryzen 2700x. Killing it for 1440p. Its enough for me :-)
I liked my R9 Fury. Was a nice card and served me well for ~4 years.
Only got moved back to its box when I needed more VRAM.
I got mine on sale in 2017 from Newegg for $200.
It has done me very well still use it to this day.
It's still an absolute beast and I see no reason to upgrade it so far.
Still plays literally everything I throw at it at High to Ultra Settings at 1080p with good FPS.
the only thing making me kinda wanna upgrade is how low the price of the 1080TI has become.
1080TI is still a badass Card but I like my R9 Fury. It's been with me since 2017.
It also looks really pretty.
Sapphire easily make the best AMD Cards.
Good Video mate.
I'd love a guide on how to undervolt an RX590 from Budget Builds Official.
I know I could search somewhere else, but it would give me a new video from BBO. :)
I just bought that same card for 175 off ebay. Very excited to test her out.
I think the reason why the Fury family got such a muted reception is because AMD (and ATI, pre-merger) has this reputation of taking bold technological leaps that completely blow their far larger competitors out of the water, and people had gotten it into their heads that HBM was going to deliver the same kind of quantum leap in performance that the Radeon 9700's 256-bit memory bus did back in the day. Instead, what we got was a perfectly competent series of cards, but one that wasn't really overwhelmingly better than the likes of the R9 290 or the GTX980.
How about including the 2020 variant of the Crysis "benchmark", Microsoft Flight Simulator?
I'll most likely grab them on a good sale sometime 👍 but I don't currently own either of them.
Have you considered crysis remastered? It can crush any card/cpu it seems
Cheeky Vega episode coming up too? (:
I've noticed it for some time now in your videos, but a tooth brush works better when you're trying to remove thermal compound off clustered areas of small SMDs.
it's been so long since budget builds has made a review and it's finaly here (fnaf it's been so long parody meme)
I could feel the heat from the pentium 4 box and the R9 GPU sat on that table from my screen