Ilford Delta 3200 - Night Exposure Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 41

  • @gtcrvs
    @gtcrvs 2 дня назад

    Great shots, adding this to my list of films to try!

  • @ThatXpanEnthusiast
    @ThatXpanEnthusiast Год назад +1

    great shots! love the detailed comparison between the different iso settings, cant wait to get my xpan shots shot at box speed in a museum back!

  • @knibestolfoto
    @knibestolfoto 11 месяцев назад

    Great shots! I like the ISO 1600 shots!

  • @gpholmes3779
    @gpholmes3779 Год назад +2

    Nice work. My favorite was 1000. Good info.

  • @acecreates
    @acecreates Год назад

    Great portraits! Id never thought of using this film for portraits.
    Thanks for sharing!

    • @DCaldwellPhotography
      @DCaldwellPhotography  Год назад

      It's one of my personal favorites for portraits. Thank you for watching!

  • @dianeyoung8042
    @dianeyoung8042 2 года назад

    These are beautiful Dakota!

  • @TheRealPenguinator
    @TheRealPenguinator 10 месяцев назад

    Honestly the more grain the more old it looks, I love it!

  • @GreenlifeFin
    @GreenlifeFin Год назад +2

    Nice comparison. So did you get these all developed normally as 3200? And just changed the ISO at the camera?

    • @DerGeileEisbaer
      @DerGeileEisbaer Год назад +3

      Although Delta3200 is called 3200 it actually has a base ISO of 1000. If you want to shoot it at 1600 or 3200 you have to push the film in development. Different film stocks react differently to being pushed but Delta3200 handles this process quite well - hence the name. So usually you choose an ISO for your roll of film and then develop accordingly. To answer your question: The gentleman in the video did most likely not do that as he commented "Had it developed normally. Just rated it at 1600 on my Mamiya." somewhere below.
      So as far as I understand most of these pictures are underexposed by a stop or two but the film stock is still awesome enough to provide usable negatives ;)

    • @GreenlifeFin
      @GreenlifeFin Год назад

      @@DerGeileEisbaer Yeah, thanks. If I push or pull, the price doubles in the lab I use. So I think I will do the same as the guy in the video.

    • @DerGeileEisbaer
      @DerGeileEisbaer Год назад +1

      @@GreenlifeFin Ouch... then maybe try developing yourself. It's cheaper and the omnipresent danger of accidentally ruining every single photo on a roll makes the whole experience quite exciting ;)

  • @gantz1782
    @gantz1782 11 месяцев назад

    Wait, so rated 1000 ISO and pushed 2 stops means you exposed it at 3200 or did you develop it at 3200 ?

  • @patcliffordfootballcoach
    @patcliffordfootballcoach Год назад

    brilliant thank you

  • @KristNorsworthy
    @KristNorsworthy Год назад

    I'm shooting with a olympus 35rc with a 42mm 2.8 lens. What would you recommend shooting for moderately low light inside photos?

    • @DCaldwellPhotography
      @DCaldwellPhotography  Год назад

      Depends on the look you're good for. Under tungsten lighting indoors, 800T is going to shine. Lomo and Portra 800 are also good. Thanks for watching!

  • @SKraus-pb1ii
    @SKraus-pb1ii Год назад

    Thanks, very good info

  • @sfenwick
    @sfenwick 2 года назад

    Nice work. Appreciate the video. Very informative. I recently experimented with rating Delta 3200 at 1600, no pull in development. Can't yet decide if I like TMax 3200 better. Cheers man.

    • @DCaldwellPhotography
      @DCaldwellPhotography  2 года назад

      Ever since using Tmax 3200 I have also been debating on which iso 3200 film I enjoy more. I wish Tmax was on medium format. Thank you for watching!

    • @scagz4518
      @scagz4518 7 месяцев назад

      How did the roll of 3200 turn out? I just finished one at 1600 and am on the fence about developing with or without a pull.

  • @retter2critical
    @retter2critical 10 месяцев назад

    Some of those were strong.

  • @film.fiasco
    @film.fiasco Год назад

    5:20 epic shot man!

  • @willowrabbit
    @willowrabbit 2 года назад

    What was your processing times?

  • @MichaelHall-kq3fo
    @MichaelHall-kq3fo 2 года назад

    dope

  • @ed8311
    @ed8311 2 года назад

    The one shot at 1600 did you push it or pull it in development?

    • @DCaldwellPhotography
      @DCaldwellPhotography  2 года назад

      Neither. Had it developed normally. Just rated it at 1600 on my Mamiya. Thank you for watching.

  • @bigshooter461
    @bigshooter461 Год назад +1

    At close to the 5 minute mark you say you are shooting this film at 1000, then say you push it 2 stops, Do you mean you are under exposing then over developing for 1000 speed or are you using the word "push" but the text on the screen says 1000 iso + 2 stops, that would be shooting at 4000iso, are you developing this roll at 4000 speed? I hear lots of people talk about pushing and pulling film, but if you aren't processing to compensate you are only under or over exposing. I ASSUME you know this, that is why I am asking because if you are shooting at 1000 you are technically already pulling almost 2 stops if you are actually shooting and developing for 1000 speed, pushing 2 stops would mean shooting back under box speed, you can't push a couple frames on the roll, adding or subtracting exp comp, is not the same as pushing or pulling, maybe I'm missing something in the story here, images look fantastic, I am sure I am missing some part of this story, how ever you say it you are making good use of the chemistry and light. 👍 Nice Work!

  • @mybinis6664
    @mybinis6664 Год назад +3

    Like for Cake.

  • @blainemarcano
    @blainemarcano Год назад

    I’d say I liked the inky blacks of the 1000.

  • @youevil9846
    @youevil9846 3 месяца назад

    Based on my own experience this film stock works better at its native ISO of 3200.