Ilford Delta 3200 - Night Exposure Test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 янв 2023
- Happy New Years all! In today's video, we conduct a portrait shoot at night using Ilford Delta 3200! Make sure you SMASH that like button! Greatly appreciate you all and enjoy the first video of the new year!
My Social Media Links :
MODEL: / taypatty
VIDEOGRAPHER: / lady.keya
INSTAGRAM: / dcaldwellphotography
Film Lab - / legacyphotolab
Great shots! I like the ISO 1600 shots!
Honestly the more grain the more old it looks, I love it!
great shots! love the detailed comparison between the different iso settings, cant wait to get my xpan shots shot at box speed in a museum back!
Thank you for watching!
Great portraits! Id never thought of using this film for portraits.
Thanks for sharing!
It's one of my personal favorites for portraits. Thank you for watching!
These are beautiful Dakota!
Thank you! & Thank you for watching! 👌🏾 👌🏾
All these shots are gorgeous. I think the 1000 set have the tightest contrast for me but they all look great. Definitely going to pick up a couple of rolls of 3200 to play with now
Thanks so much! Enjoy your rolls of 3200! Hope they arrive soon!
Nice work. My favorite was 1000. Good info.
Appreciate that! I loved the 1000 as well!
brilliant thank you
Thanks for watching!
Thanks, very good info
Thank you for watching!
dope
Thanks for watching!
Like for Cake.
5:20 epic shot man!
Thank you! && thanks for watching!
Some of those were strong.
Nice work. Appreciate the video. Very informative. I recently experimented with rating Delta 3200 at 1600, no pull in development. Can't yet decide if I like TMax 3200 better. Cheers man.
Ever since using Tmax 3200 I have also been debating on which iso 3200 film I enjoy more. I wish Tmax was on medium format. Thank you for watching!
How did the roll of 3200 turn out? I just finished one at 1600 and am on the fence about developing with or without a pull.
I'm shooting with a olympus 35rc with a 42mm 2.8 lens. What would you recommend shooting for moderately low light inside photos?
Depends on the look you're good for. Under tungsten lighting indoors, 800T is going to shine. Lomo and Portra 800 are also good. Thanks for watching!
Nice comparison. So did you get these all developed normally as 3200? And just changed the ISO at the camera?
Although Delta3200 is called 3200 it actually has a base ISO of 1000. If you want to shoot it at 1600 or 3200 you have to push the film in development. Different film stocks react differently to being pushed but Delta3200 handles this process quite well - hence the name. So usually you choose an ISO for your roll of film and then develop accordingly. To answer your question: The gentleman in the video did most likely not do that as he commented "Had it developed normally. Just rated it at 1600 on my Mamiya." somewhere below.
So as far as I understand most of these pictures are underexposed by a stop or two but the film stock is still awesome enough to provide usable negatives ;)
@@DerGeileEisbaer Yeah, thanks. If I push or pull, the price doubles in the lab I use. So I think I will do the same as the guy in the video.
@@GreenlifeFin Ouch... then maybe try developing yourself. It's cheaper and the omnipresent danger of accidentally ruining every single photo on a roll makes the whole experience quite exciting ;)
What was your processing times?
Wait, so rated 1000 ISO and pushed 2 stops means you exposed it at 3200 or did you develop it at 3200 ?
The one shot at 1600 did you push it or pull it in development?
Neither. Had it developed normally. Just rated it at 1600 on my Mamiya. Thank you for watching.
I’d say I liked the inky blacks of the 1000.
I also was a fan of those as well. Thank you for watching!
At close to the 5 minute mark you say you are shooting this film at 1000, then say you push it 2 stops, Do you mean you are under exposing then over developing for 1000 speed or are you using the word "push" but the text on the screen says 1000 iso + 2 stops, that would be shooting at 4000iso, are you developing this roll at 4000 speed? I hear lots of people talk about pushing and pulling film, but if you aren't processing to compensate you are only under or over exposing. I ASSUME you know this, that is why I am asking because if you are shooting at 1000 you are technically already pulling almost 2 stops if you are actually shooting and developing for 1000 speed, pushing 2 stops would mean shooting back under box speed, you can't push a couple frames on the roll, adding or subtracting exp comp, is not the same as pushing or pulling, maybe I'm missing something in the story here, images look fantastic, I am sure I am missing some part of this story, how ever you say it you are making good use of the chemistry and light. 👍 Nice Work!