@@splintergp Nope, by exemple the rx7 13b act a little like a 1.3 liter inline 6. The 4 rotor of this car and the 787b, him, act like an inline 12 of 2.6 liter (2.6 for the 787b at least, but i think it could be the same for this car cause it seems to be the optimal 4 rotor size).
The rotor rotates at one third of the speed of the eccentric shaft meaning for every 360° of eccentric shaft rotation, only 1 combustion event occurs per rotor. This is 2 combustion events every 720° of crank/eccentric shaft rotation. A normal 4 stroke engine has one combustion event every 720° of crankshaft rotation per piston. This means that rotaries double the combustion events and double the displacement compared to piston engines. Meaning the 13B functions as a 2616cc I4, the 20B as a 3924cc V6 and the 26B a 5232cc V8. Many racing series around the globe consider rotaries as double displacement.
@@hugoku8755 but due to the fact that 1300 cc of air is being combusted once every 360° of engine rotation, 720° would mean that that 1300cc is being combusted twice per rotor.
@@anoop_brar _stares at the Group B RX-7, Group C RX-7, IMSA FB RX-7, IMSA FC RX-7, the Le Man's FC3S RX-7, the RX-7 GT3 that won the 2010 SCCA National Championship runoffs, and all the 787b predecessors, including the 787_ Yeah we only got the 787b as a rotary race car
0:35 Because they gave it to Top Gear... Where it lit on fire... They still don't know how it happened... and it was a 1 of 1 concept (kinda like the rimac hammond crashed)
The Mazda 787B had a 2616cc Naturally Aspirated 4 Rotor engine making 900 hp at 10,500 rpm in Max Trim and 700 hp at 9000 rpm in Race Trim. A good piston engine counter part would be a 10000 rpm 5.2L V8.
YO! amazing build, the car seems like a perfect competitor for 767b, but i noticed that the download for the car gives you a different one, specifically the big powerful luxury sedan you made.
In the off-chance you actually read this one, heres a challenge idea: Say the designers and engineers got their plans mixed up and the resulting car is a bit wonky. Drivetrain is front engine transverse AWD with a 3.6L 60° naturally aspirated V6, and the car was intended to be a mid-size sport sedan(IRL equivalent would be an Acura TLX). The designers however, were told they were designing a full-size panel van (IRL equivalent would be a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter). The deadline to have a plan for the car was too close to go back to the drawing board, so they had to hope for the best that their new sports van would actually work. Body should be designed with being as large a panel van as possible, engine should be between 350 and 400hp, suspension tuned for handling, transmission tuned for quick acceleration, brakes should be beefy as well.
A more equivalent engine would've been a 4 liter. The reason the 26b (787b/imsa rx7 engines) was so dominant is that they exploited the displacement rule. Displacement measurements for a piston engine is how much air it moves through 720 degrees of the crankshaft, well Mazda used the same formula for the rotary engine. The exploit comes into play when you acknowledge that for a typical 2 rotor (13b, the actual motor platform from the first gen gsl-se all the way through the third gen rx7) only 4 of the 6 chambers have entered the exhaust "stroke". Meaning that through a full cycle of all 6 rotor faces the 13b is actually like just shy of 2 liters of displacement. Math may be slightly off for the 26b because of how the rotors are aligned, but the equivalent displacement would be well over 3 liters nonetheless.
with displacment when the piston is at its lowest point it is the full area in liters that if you were to fill it with water would occupy then multiplied by the amount of pistons with a rotory it is a much lower displacement from that witch is the normal measurement of displacement and is why its measured in liters
Incorrect. The displacement of an engine is based on total swept volume (Or rather how much air can be moved at one time). A rotary's displacement was calculated on it's swept volume for the chamber that's undergoing combustion only, which would be only a single face of the rotor. It's where the some 650 cc per rotor displacement comes from. Mazda (and others) argued that since only a single rotor face undergoes combustion at any one time, only a single face should count, since the engine itself is only able to consume a singe face worth of air at any given time. This means in the two rotor 13b, the displacement is 1.3L. Each rotor can only combust 650 cc of air at once, giving a displacement of 1.3L. The discrepancy comes from the fact we consider a single rotor to be one chamber, and not three separate chambers. A standard piston engine typically goes through it's entire combustion volume in 720 degrees, whilst a rotary engine is able to do the same in only 360 degrees. Given this, racing regulations changed to state that an NA Rotary (Turbos add another multiplier on displacement for all engines) should have it's displacement multiplied by 2 to give a rough equivalent to a piston engine. The 13b is still a 1.3L engine by classification, however it is equivalent to a 2.6L since in the same time a standard engine consumes all it's volume, a rotary can do it twice over. The 26b is equivalent to a 5.2 litre engine, not a 4 litre. Furthermore, no the 787b was not dominant. In fact it was significantly slower. It only won Le Mans in 1992 because it was significantly more fuel efficient, and reliable. The displacement of the engine largely did not matter. Rotary race cars were largely middle of the pack in all race series in performance categories, aside from a few exceptions that performed remarkably well despite largely punching above it's weight, against cars with significant more torque, and in turn power. The IMSA Rx7 was never the most powerful car on the grid, nor was it ever the best in any specific performance category, it was just so well rounded and by quote from the drivers "unkillable" and "It would just keep running" that made it perform remarkably well.
Why is everyone going with 95 octane gasoline? Why not better, for example 100 octane, when it is a high powered car and you can buy 100 octane gas on any pump
@@CynixalYT_WRLD in Europe, we have 100 octane gasoline almost at every pump, our standard gasoline is 95 octane..the 100 is about 10 % more expensive than the 95
@@marekmecir5822 ah well that’s also Europe. I’m in the U.S. however Ik in the U.S. we do have varying octanes but near me typically lowest octane is 89 and highest is 97
Just : as the 787b was capable of around 800 horsepower with his 2.6 N/A 4 rotor, and that it seems to be the perfect 4 rotor size so this one must have the same size : it is the successor, so it is better. So this engine must have around 1000 horse powers N/A (cause the wankel, as a new technology, goes better fast). So, you gived this car the desavantage of a "low power" and a turbo lag that it dont should have in reality.
In the fixture tab, there is an advanced editing thingy, it is a gear icon near the bottom right, big button, you can edit TONS of things that really make your car better or goofier
there is really no reason for wankels to still be developed bc they are just an inferior design... BUT on the emotional side for many people (sound, feel etc) it is a superior engine. unfortunately many companies are super soulless corporate bodies deleting any emotions from the car manufacturing. currently i am worried for the car scene future looking at corporate monsters like VAG and such.
Rotary are pretty good at racing though, also there are other model of rotary based on wankel that still continue to be developed and have less issues, it can be a nice engine especially if you consider a more sport market since the concerns matter less for those.
Rotary's are better race/sport/hyper/super car engines. It was stopped because it was banned of the endurance races, and the endurances races are the better way to devellop an engine. Then, with the pollution reglementation, it became almost impossible to make one. But still, thats an excellent engine configuration, just not for an economic car.
@@lucaskook9440 Ok, so lets stop youtube, social medias, all supercars importation of exotic fruits and any hollyday journey. It pollute a lot more than all the 90 cars together.
Great job bro...however for next time please talk less and reduce voice volume (while racing) since at the end it would've been better had we just had the cockpit view and the engine sound going through the track...
C'mon, do some rear engine RWD stuff that isn't a 911 or Beetle expy, shooting for a 40/60 F/R weight distribution. *EDIT:* Wow, was not expecting this car to be rear... It definitely looked like a mid engine body... Well, I still stand by what I said because this isn't really anything close to a normal car, which is what I want to see more of. Rear engine sedans, wagons, shooting brakes, SUVs; Shit with 4 REAL adult fitting seats, 3 seats with a center driver (offset just barely forward of the edge of the rear seats), FIVE seats with a center driver(same offset idea), and so on.
My uncle owns a rx7, bought off the showroom when it was brand new. Dudes a office worker and doesn't know any shit about engine. But he decided rebuild and tune the rotary engine. Unc now know the neat and greedy of that spinning boy
When you changed it to white it totally looks like the porsche 911 GT1 Straßenversion (i had to look up the name cause there was no way id be able to remember the spelling of it 🤣) But also the start/finish line isnt on the long straight, just so you know for the future lol
Does anyone know if there's a way to export the car files from BeamNG or Automation to a CAD program? Been thinking about 3D printing a few cars I have on 1:24 scale
it should end with .dae and have a random mush of letters and depending on what version of automation you have the model could be located in many different places
dude how many hours did this take? I tried making a radiator and hoses on a 40s car I did and it was a huge pain to do and didn't look near as good as that engine
If you were to translate the name of this car to English it'd be ''The Are (French) SV (Possibly Super Fast if you assume it stands for SuperVeloce (Italian) as in Lamborghini Murcielago SV) Touring (Italian) Grand Touring''
Bro, you turned it down and i couldn't hear it. Great video, but i couldn't hear the engine at all, even with headphones. Your voice was louder then everything else by miles.
@@TwinTurBros i made some cars and i learned alot from you including others like trize i wish i could show u my cars but if i gave link the comment would get deleted
Nice car but next time can you make sure to include a bit of time driving the car without a voice over? I'd like to hear the car better without any speaking making it hard to hear
I started saying some bad things in my head when u turned down the volume of the engine (main subject of this video's existence) and all i could hear was ur ear gutting voice, nice job tho.👍
@12:54 Literally can't hear the engine at all after you turned the volume down and I'm even wearing headphones, nice headphones at that. You turned the volume down way too much. I can still hear it if I crank the volume up but then your voice is way too loud. You can hear the engine somewhat when you get to the actual driving, but you need to find a better balance because you have your voice way way louder than everything else.
Press F to pay respects to traditional web browsers. Download Opera GX for FREE: mtchm.de/bwdjf
Had opera gx for so long i forgot about half the features it actually has. Thanks for reminding me
allready have it :) Really nice browser i must say.
Is the CLK GTR body an automation mod? Or is it just in the game
Dude, this browser is china spyware. look it up.
Chinese Spyware go brrrrrr
The only thing i would change is that you made it with an I3. One rotor has 3 burning chambers, so for a racecar you would wanna use a V12 as a base.
yeah, technically speaking you could call the 1.3L a 3.6L or something
@@splintergp Nope, by exemple the rx7 13b act a little like a 1.3 liter inline 6. The 4 rotor of this car and the 787b, him, act like an inline 12 of 2.6 liter (2.6 for the 787b at least, but i think it could be the same for this car cause it seems to be the optimal 4 rotor size).
The rotor rotates at one third of the speed of the eccentric shaft meaning for every 360° of eccentric shaft rotation, only 1 combustion event occurs per rotor. This is 2 combustion events every 720° of crank/eccentric shaft rotation. A normal 4 stroke engine has one combustion event every 720° of crankshaft rotation per piston. This means that rotaries double the combustion events and double the displacement compared to piston engines. Meaning the 13B functions as a 2616cc I4, the 20B as a 3924cc V6 and the 26B a 5232cc V8. Many racing series around the globe consider rotaries as double displacement.
@@inzanex36a89 Thats more for comparaison than in reality. The displacement is the size of combustion rooms, here 1.3 liter.
@@hugoku8755 but due to the fact that 1300 cc of air is being combusted once every 360° of engine rotation, 720° would mean that that 1300cc is being combusted twice per rotor.
I wish rotary racing was bigger irl
My dude
i like the enviorment
one has to die so the pther can live
@@frawzch.048 I choose the environment can die
ya the only we got with the rotary is with the mazda 787b
@@anoop_brar _stares at the Group B RX-7, Group C RX-7, IMSA FB RX-7, IMSA FC RX-7, the Le Man's FC3S RX-7, the RX-7 GT3 that won the 2010 SCCA National Championship runoffs, and all the 787b predecessors, including the 787_
Yeah we only got the 787b as a rotary race car
@@SkylineLofe lol my bad
0:35 Because they gave it to Top Gear... Where it lit on fire... They still don't know how it happened... and it was a 1 of 1 concept (kinda like the rimac hammond crashed)
There was I think 8 of the rimacs hammond drove
I think it was because the exhaust became so hot it burned the body
This is a very pretty car. Well done!
pretty lol?
Pretty ugly
@ParryHotter Yeah, I like most of that car, but those headlights...
Looks like a mix between the porsche gt1, the clk gtr and the lotus elise gt1
I like the headlights they look fresh
The Mazda 787B had a 2616cc Naturally Aspirated 4 Rotor engine making 900 hp at 10,500 rpm in Max Trim and 700 hp at 9000 rpm in Race Trim. A good piston engine counter part would be a 10000 rpm 5.2L V8.
it had potential of 900hp, didnt have 900
@@rotary.revolution Whoopsies then.
And after the Le Mans race it was entered it was discovered that particular engine could've done another 24 hours with minimal power loss
Technically there was a succesor to the 787b: the mxr-01, although it had a v10 instead of a rotary
Oooh rotary?? Interesting how you managed to make the engine, nice work
Thanks for using my GT mod =) hope you liked it
Thanks for making it my guy
YO! amazing build, the car seems like a perfect competitor for 767b, but i noticed that the download for the car gives you a different one, specifically the big powerful luxury sedan you made.
A car this fast in the 90’s for $40k?
This would’ve been CRACKED as f*ck & made bigger brands look like a bunch of amateurs.
The engine sound in the cinematics is heavenly. Might give the LFA's V10 a run for it's money.
I want to see more Leçon made cars. one of your best fictional car companies.
Thank you so much for returning the Timelapse
In the off-chance you actually read this one, heres a challenge idea:
Say the designers and engineers got their plans mixed up and the resulting car is a bit wonky. Drivetrain is front engine transverse AWD with a 3.6L 60° naturally aspirated V6, and the car was intended to be a mid-size sport sedan(IRL equivalent would be an Acura TLX). The designers however, were told they were designing a full-size panel van (IRL equivalent would be a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter). The deadline to have a plan for the car was too close to go back to the drawing board, so they had to hope for the best that their new sports van would actually work.
Body should be designed with being as large a panel van as possible, engine should be between 350 and 400hp, suspension tuned for handling, transmission tuned for quick acceleration, brakes should be beefy as well.
I love rotary, and with this channel i know that the video is gonna be a banger.
A more equivalent engine would've been a 4 liter.
The reason the 26b (787b/imsa rx7 engines) was so dominant is that they exploited the displacement rule. Displacement measurements for a piston engine is how much air it moves through 720 degrees of the crankshaft, well Mazda used the same formula for the rotary engine.
The exploit comes into play when you acknowledge that for a typical 2 rotor (13b, the actual motor platform from the first gen gsl-se all the way through the third gen rx7) only 4 of the 6 chambers have entered the exhaust "stroke". Meaning that through a full cycle of all 6 rotor faces the 13b is actually like just shy of 2 liters of displacement.
Math may be slightly off for the 26b because of how the rotors are aligned, but the equivalent displacement would be well over 3 liters nonetheless.
with displacment when the piston is at its lowest point it is the full area in liters that if you were to fill it with water would occupy then multiplied by the amount of pistons with a rotory it is a much lower displacement from that witch is the normal measurement of displacement and is why its measured in liters
Incorrect. The displacement of an engine is based on total swept volume (Or rather how much air can be moved at one time). A rotary's displacement was calculated on it's swept volume for the chamber that's undergoing combustion only, which would be only a single face of the rotor. It's where the some 650 cc per rotor displacement comes from. Mazda (and others) argued that since only a single rotor face undergoes combustion at any one time, only a single face should count, since the engine itself is only able to consume a singe face worth of air at any given time. This means in the two rotor 13b, the displacement is 1.3L. Each rotor can only combust 650 cc of air at once, giving a displacement of 1.3L. The discrepancy comes from the fact we consider a single rotor to be one chamber, and not three separate chambers.
A standard piston engine typically goes through it's entire combustion volume in 720 degrees, whilst a rotary engine is able to do the same in only 360 degrees. Given this, racing regulations changed to state that an NA Rotary (Turbos add another multiplier on displacement for all engines) should have it's displacement multiplied by 2 to give a rough equivalent to a piston engine. The 13b is still a 1.3L engine by classification, however it is equivalent to a 2.6L since in the same time a standard engine consumes all it's volume, a rotary can do it twice over.
The 26b is equivalent to a 5.2 litre engine, not a 4 litre.
Furthermore, no the 787b was not dominant. In fact it was significantly slower. It only won Le Mans in 1992 because it was significantly more fuel efficient, and reliable. The displacement of the engine largely did not matter. Rotary race cars were largely middle of the pack in all race series in performance categories, aside from a few exceptions that performed remarkably well despite largely punching above it's weight, against cars with significant more torque, and in turn power. The IMSA Rx7 was never the most powerful car on the grid, nor was it ever the best in any specific performance category, it was just so well rounded and by quote from the drivers "unkillable" and "It would just keep running" that made it perform remarkably well.
This
I haven't seen such artful sculpting in automation!
Why is everyone going with 95 octane gasoline? Why not better, for example 100 octane, when it is a high powered car and you can buy 100 octane gas on any pump
Haven’t seen 100 octane at any pump near me🤷🏼♂️😭
@@CynixalYT_WRLD in Europe, we have 100 octane gasoline almost at every pump, our standard gasoline is 95 octane..the 100 is about 10 % more expensive than the 95
@@marekmecir5822 havent seen 100 octane in like 15 years, we get 95 and 98
@@marekmecir5822 ah well that’s also Europe. I’m in the U.S. however Ik in the U.S. we do have varying octanes but near me typically lowest octane is 89 and highest is 97
Measurement System for octane is different from Europe (RON only) to The US (RON+MON:2). So US basically Shows 93 when Europe says 98.
Just : as the 787b was capable of around 800 horsepower with his 2.6 N/A 4 rotor, and that it seems to be the perfect 4 rotor size so this one must have the same size : it is the successor, so it is better. So this engine must have around 1000 horse powers N/A (cause the wankel, as a new technology, goes better fast). So, you gived this car the desavantage of a "low power" and a turbo lag that it dont should have in reality.
Video starts at 2:34
Goat
I got excited because I thought automation added rotaries lol.
You should try to build a Geo Tracker competitor type thing, a small off-road focused SUV, could be fun.
18:40 Thank god it didn't flew
the 4 headlights are gonna create soooo much drag
Exactly. We want that right?!!!!
@@TwinTurBros drag is so bad for top speed :CC
@@TwinTurBros we hate to be absurd, but we’re french
Probably your best video yet, really nice!
The 787B had a 2.6 liter 4 rotor
0:29 Wasn't the mazda RX-792-P the potential successor to the 787-B?
Sir, I challenge you in the art of Automation car creation!
Let's duel on Nordschleife and Automation track with our new or existing creations
Hopefully they add rotaries and maybe other crazy engine types like a W piston configured engines, maybe diesel fuel types too
How did you fixed the ride height? I looked very high from the ground and the you started the design time lapse and it magically became perfect
In the fixture tab, there is an advanced editing thingy, it is a gear icon near the bottom right, big button, you can edit TONS of things that really make your car better or goofier
Perfect upload my friend, have just smashed that like button ✌
there is really no reason for wankels to still be developed bc they are just an inferior design... BUT on the emotional side for many people (sound, feel etc) it is a superior engine. unfortunately many companies are super soulless corporate bodies deleting any emotions from the car manufacturing. currently i am worried for the car scene future looking at corporate monsters like VAG and such.
Rotary are pretty good at racing though, also there are other model of rotary based on wankel that still continue to be developed and have less issues, it can be a nice engine especially if you consider a more sport market since the concerns matter less for those.
@@splintergp yes :)
Rotary's are better race/sport/hyper/super car engines. It was stopped because it was banned of the endurance races, and the endurances races are the better way to devellop an engine. Then, with the pollution reglementation, it became almost impossible to make one.
But still, thats an excellent engine configuration, just not for an economic car.
@@hugoku8755 it is important to build more efficient enviromental friendly engines but it still makes me sad
@@lucaskook9440 Ok, so lets stop youtube, social medias, all supercars importation of exotic fruits and any hollyday journey. It pollute a lot more than all the 90 cars together.
it looks like a mix of some 90's Le Mans cars like the CLK GTR and the 911 GT1
Great job bro...however for next time please talk less and reduce voice volume (while racing) since at the end it would've been better had we just had the cockpit view and the engine sound going through the track...
Dude... I was happy to find a car like the one you showcased!! but the car in the download link is nothing like the one you showcase!!! Many thanks!!!
It may be a bit immature, but I can't help but laugh at the term wankel
I may or may not have done multiple takes saying it
C'mon, do some rear engine RWD stuff that isn't a 911 or Beetle expy, shooting for a 40/60 F/R weight distribution. *EDIT:* Wow, was not expecting this car to be rear... It definitely looked like a mid engine body... Well, I still stand by what I said because this isn't really anything close to a normal car, which is what I want to see more of. Rear engine sedans, wagons, shooting brakes, SUVs; Shit with 4 REAL adult fitting seats, 3 seats with a center driver (offset just barely forward of the edge of the rear seats), FIVE seats with a center driver(same offset idea), and so on.
I would absolutely love a car with a rotary engine
My uncle owns a rx7, bought off the showroom when it was brand new. Dudes a office worker and doesn't know any shit about engine. But he decided rebuild and tune the rotary engine. Unc now know the neat and greedy of that spinning boy
When you changed it to white it totally looks like the porsche 911 GT1 Straßenversion (i had to look up the name cause there was no way id be able to remember the spelling of it 🤣)
But also the start/finish line isnt on the long straight, just so you know for the future lol
Does anyone know if there's a way to export the car files from BeamNG or Automation to a CAD program? Been thinking about 3D printing a few cars I have on 1:24 scale
Good question, hopefully someone has the answer for you
I’m sure the mesh is somewhere in the files
it should end with .dae and have a random mush of letters and depending on what version of automation you have the model could be located in many different places
dude how many hours did this take? I tried making a radiator and hoses on a 40s car I did and it was a huge pain to do and didn't look near as good as that engine
it was a mod from hw parts pack
They need to add Diesel engines to that game
Hey man, for ur steering wheel i recommend you to try a 180° angle in total. I tend to use thst if i wanna play sims as more "Arcady"
Let's check how this engine sounds...
but I will keep talking non stop so you will hear nothing.
If you were to translate the name of this car to English it'd be ''The Are (French) SV (Possibly Super Fast if you assume it stands for SuperVeloce (Italian) as in Lamborghini Murcielago SV) Touring (Italian) Grand Touring''
this is basically the assoluto fatalita on steroids
I wish this guy would turn the engine volume up
Do you publish the cars you make somwhere? i really like the cars you make bc they allways look good.
nvm i looked at the description xD
7:49 that front end looks so much like a Porsche
Bro, you turned it down and i couldn't hear it.
Great video, but i couldn't hear the engine at all, even with headphones. Your voice was louder then everything else by miles.
But I like my voice :(
@@TwinTurBros boo hoo and where r ur uploads?
Somewhere at some point ☝️
@@TwinTurBros i made some cars and i learned alot from you including others like trize i wish i could show u my cars but if i gave link the comment would get deleted
I wish I could hear the engines more, idk how loud it is in the game but here its half of your voice, and I have no idea how it actually sounds like.
I noticed you have VLC installed. You can use it to easily convert mp3 to wav.
What you made there is a Mazda 767/767b the 3 rotor predecessor to the 787B!
The car in the thumbnail looks like a CLK GTR with TVR headlights
The Mazda 787B won more on circumstances than anything else
6:30 No luxury
Choses premium satnav
That car lookin like Stinkfly from Ben 10
Opera GX, my personal favorite. The best browser I've used in my life.
only if this browser didn't turn white every time it updated... that sidebar was amazing.
Never experienced that lol@@swilleh_
I don't know whether I love or hate your channel name lol
Why hate :(
I made this channel originally with my twin brother LOL
@@TwinTurBros that makes sense. The pun is quite clever honestly!
Nice car but next time can you make sure to include a bit of time driving the car without a voice over? I'd like to hear the car better without any speaking making it hard to hear
it looks like the Mercedes-Benz AMG CLK GTR
I have a request / idea for a video. A V16 max stroke min bore turbo supercar.😅
looks like the weirdest mercedes clk gtr
In the nürburgring you have to start where u at in 18.07 for setting a lap
now we sould make a modernized GTR r34, mabe a rb 30, maybe swap it with a c32/c40xe from opel omega, or maybe a ford barra swap it and max out
I started saying some bad things in my head when u turned down the volume of the engine (main subject of this video's existence) and all i could hear was ur ear gutting voice, nice job tho.👍
Make the Delorean dmc-24 concept in automation
You can get a much better version if the nordschleife track in beamng
Does the gaming browser have gaming cookies?
Must've forgot you have a muffler and a cat
so not a rotary
I need that windows theme
This is Literally an Mazda 787 Street Version
17:38 Why don't you use laserscanned fersion from Kunos Sim (Assetto Corsa)? o_O
Paggini owners be like rpm 10k rpm man I’m dead
make longer video’s. you will get far more views. for the rest nice videos 😅
Literally a race car? As opposed to figuratively a race car?
Exactly
The power curve of the inline 3 is similar to what a rotary engine would have right?
IM USING OPERA GX RN
Mazda 787B engine powered Mercy CLK GTR?🤔
I dont undestand anything but i like car
same
I'm not first but I'm here
the 4 rotor is the 26b
Yeah then maybe we would actually have a rotary in automation
Me watching youtube on opera gx:
Crvazy man
VLC has a file converter built in...why not just use that?
reminds me of the gumpert apollo
@12:54 Literally can't hear the engine at all after you turned the volume down and I'm even wearing headphones, nice headphones at that. You turned the volume down way too much. I can still hear it if I crank the volume up but then your voice is way too loud. You can hear the engine somewhat when you get to the actual driving, but you need to find a better balance because you have your voice way way louder than everything else.
Mazda needs to make a new rx7
looks kind of like mercedes
its the new porsche, porsche 4eye
rip Mazda Furai
Its pronounced "wave". Like, catching a wave.
WE THE BEST MUSIC
why would one want a GAMING Browser??? Also Opera uses the Chromium Engine doesnt it? Chromium is a HUGE RAM-Hog.
hey the download link in the desc is wrong i think
It kinda looks like a mercedes project one
Never trusting a fart ever again ong