Dragon's Dogma 2 PC - It's Got Issues... Even When Patched
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 апр 2024
- ► Watch the original video here: • Dragon's Dogma 2 - PS5...
► Watch the patch update video here: • Dragon's Dogma 2: Does...
► Support us on Patreon! bit.ly/3jEGjvx
► Digital Foundry RUclips: / digitalfoundry
► Digital Foundry Merch: store.digitalfoundry.net
► Digital Foundry at Eurogamer: eurogamer.net/digitalfoundry
► Follow on Twitter: / digitalfoundry
this game is the definition of an immersive gameplay. Medusa's stare into the camera results in a total PC freeze up and crash. 10/10 masterpiece.
And if you have Gygabite psu it just goes kaboom ! 😂 Truly 4D experience
That must suck it runs flawlessly on PS5. 90+ hours and no problems.
Yea better optimized for console Japan don't care for pc
I'm waiting for Dragon's Catma.
Dragon's Dog, Man
@@Threewlz DogMan's Dragon
Dog's Dragonma ass
Yo dragon mamma
Catma balls
Elden Ring, Jedi Survivor. None of these games ever get properly patched.
One of the few games that actually got "fixed" was Gotham Knights.................
Gotham Knights.............
Elden ring runs a steady 60fps on all consoles no?
@@TylerRolloGuitarNope.
@@TylerRolloGuitar close enough to 60 that you don't notice it if it isn't.
There are some places on Elden Ring that are crazy limited on the cpu
@gothpunkboy89 that's just straight up Wrong, tho. The game pretty much NEVER hits 60fps on series x and ps5. Even on pc, with a 3080 ti and 5800X3D, I can't maintain anywhere close to a locked 120fps at 1080p when roaming the open world, and the stuttering is ridiculously bad. Particle effects are highly unoptomized as well, tanking my framerate and GPU usage when poison mist, fire, or anything else with heavy Particle effects (perfumers, poison plants, magic plants, dragon breath attacks, etc...) it's awful and still hasn't been fixed, and most likely never will, even when the DLC drops
The amount of close up pop-in is something i hoped to be a thing of the past the last couple of years… yet here we are, worse then ever….
Yea it’s insane they thought it acceptable to release a game in that state. Looks like a ps2 era title
Funny how critics didnt mention anything about performance issues in their review
This is what infuriates me. No mention of micro transactions or of these extreme performance issues. They all did this even reviewers I trust like ACG; wtf man. Did the review copy release in a different state or is this a case of incentives making reviewers omit issues
@@iamgates7679 oh true! I forgot about MTX
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I think the mtx were added at launch, which is incredibly slimy on Capcom's part. That practice has to die. Absolute scumfuckery.
@@Jakster840 true. Like they did with RE4 Remake?
Same as Elden Ring, and Elden Ring still has performance issues, yet its praised as a masterpiece 😂😂😂
Thanks for this, Alex. My rule of waiting for 12 months after release solidifies more and more as time passes.
If they patch again and don't fix it, don't expect a significant change. I'd like to think they will fix it, but I've got major doubts
Dude, your expectations are unrealistic. Major problems will take a lot more time to fix. Come back in 6 months. Forget about the game for now.
@@Tyfuzzle
Right..... just wait like with Dead Space Remake or many other releases nowdays. Unfinished producs doesn't deserve your money, period. Just forget it.
Changing the config file line ParallelBuildProcessorCount from 8 to 16 on my 13700k made a huge improvement for me. I was dropping into 40's even in the open world now I'm about double that with much better frametimes and more consistent performance in major cities. Would be curious to see some in depth testing on this. Never looked at thread usage but I'd imagine it's better utilizing my cores.
Yeah! I did a similar thing during the first week when I was just messing around with the config (can only turn off film grain through the config...) and noticed it, even though I'm on a 5800X3D, changing it from 8 to 12 made a difference, I'll try changing it to 16 :) also changing CPU priority in Task Manager to High defo helps
I have 5800x3d also. I’ll have to try this
Did you guys test the checkpint rest town with rt? It was fine for me on day one but now drops from 60 to even 10 fps with 10% cpu usage
Honestly this game only struggles in one major city on my aging 2080 ti at 1440p , most other places I'm at 60-70 fps . It could be better in the city , the graphics could be better but the game itself is amazing , I don't get all the hate ...it's more than playable though ( I repeat) they need to sort the city out x :)
I gave up on dd2 and started playing dd dark arisen on pc, haven’t played it since it released on ps4 so it feels alot better running at 4k 120fps locked vs the yoyo that dd2 is currently
I'm sure this will be said about DD2 in about a decade lol
Yea I just want it locked I don’t care if it’s 30 or 60 tbh. I just want it functional it’s not much to ask for these days
It doesn't even look much worse. DD2's graphics are bland, it almost looks like someone just threw RTGI on a PS4 era game.
@@jsVfPe3 That's not true. The game looks phenomenal at max settings on the pc. It's the closest that I've ever seen to a Final Fantasy CGI done in real time. The lighting in particular really stands out. However, due to the incredible size of the game, not all areas were created equal and so there are some spots that may appear as you say, bland.
@@kimlee6643 No because better hardware wont solve the games issues
As far as framegen goes, the mod really helps the game feel better and i suggest it to anyone with a 4000 series gpu.
I did, but apparently it crashes if you play in 4k.. crashed every time
@slickrickwillyjames im in 3440x1440p for me it doesn't crash at least at that res. But i had heard that it used to crash before the patch, i never tried it before the patch.
Pc issue. Never had a issue on a ps5 with any of these games 😂 can’t run a 360 game if y’all tried
@homelander2243 what?
I currently have an i9 12950HX RTX 3080 Ti laptop. How will the game run on this CPU ? The average CPU power consumption is 50W. Is this enough to play in full details and 60fps?
There's minutes pauses once you get into the moored world cinematic. i9 14900k and 4090
Pretty sure they said they didn't put out a big patch for PC. The performance patch is coming later.
For people with 4090 or 4080: Try the Quality Raytracing mod. Improves ray tracing to full resolution (vanilla it is factor 0.4). It helps the "image stability" and image quality significantly, most of the flickering and smearing is gone. Together with the Better Water mod, most of my criticisms from the beginning have now been resolved or at least noticeably improved. The game now looks really good. Another advantage: Since the GPU load is now often at 100 percent even in the cities (always well over 90), this also helps the frame time enormously, it is now a fairly smooth line and feels noticeably better than even after the patch. Disadvantage: Of course, it costs a lot of performance, which is probably why I suggest the mod for RTX 4080 and above. With the 4090 I now have at 4K, TAA with Frame Generation (a must) in the cities around 70 fps and outside 90-95 (without FG cities 50 outside 60). I do not use DLSS here because it is blurry. But the performance hit is more than worth it. Try it out.
By the way, with the ray tracing mod, VRAM consumption increases to up to 16GB (previously around 13).
To be fair... They did state in the patch notes that this wasnt to address the performance issues dorectly. 🤔
I mean, it’s still important for prospective buyers to know the state of the performance of this game two weeks out or whatever it is.
I get it you have an emotional attachment to this game, but don’t let that squander any care you have for corporations to put out fully working products.
If we’re going to hold some studios accountable then I think we need to be consistent and hold ALL studios accountable, no matter how fun or awesome the game is. It’s still sold at 70 bucks, whether it’s fully functioning or not .
I agree with what you are saying. To make it bearable for me, I have to cap my fps to 30. I can get 60 fps in most places. But it's a bit volatile. 🥲
What reason do any of us have to be fair? This is a 70 dollar purchase this corporation decided to launch it in this state. Them mentioning this in the patch notes it’s just to placate people into thinking “fixes are coming” so now.. don’t be fair to these fucking companies or these developers.
Amount of screen freeze and crash during my 80 hr gameplay was terrible. I finally got it somewhat stable by capping the frames at 60.
is it worth it to wait until they patched or update the game ?
I cant even play on high or ultra settings because my game keeps crashing then. On a 3070. I think its the tree and grass quality and/or shadows causing it (getting a "fatal D3D error" crash log). Since the crashes happened in the forested areas of Vermund most of the time and as good as never in Battahl. When I lowered those settings, the crashes became much more rare. Gotta test if they are completely gone tho.
I'll buy it when it's $10 for Xmas..LMFAO
Fuk that I’ll download it when it’s cracked.
At this point when a game releases from AAA companies. It's better to wait till the following year when the game is cheaper and fixed.
Yup, I’m always a few years behind and it’s way better. Get the game on sale and in it’s best condition.
@timothykirby4406 It's sad it has to be like that, it is what it is. At least we get to save some money.
It is sad but these companies are forcing people to do that.
I'm glad this is here I was hoping it wasn't just my PC the frame pacing is god awful. It's obvious this engine isn't made for open world games like this.
It needs a bunch of stuff, upgrading to a newer version of dlss, helps the vegetation a lot
Frame times graphs during cities remind me of earthquake graps lol.
Frame generation is in the game it's just hidden. There is a mod on nexus that unlocks it.
But it's crap, the UI flicker.
@@TeeRkee probably why they disabled it
4k don't work. It crashes
I’m still loving it, even though it baffles me that they don’t offer a lower res option. It’s such a fun game though, the combat is really satisfying in my opinion, and there’s just so much action around every corner. I killed my first Dragon yesterday, still super pumped about it 24 hours later.
But i have bad performance even outside the city when looking at that direction 😢😢 even far away 😅
Did you hear that people were killing npcs to improve performance? 😂😂
I’m getting ff7 instead. I can wait for this to get sorted hopefully
Much superior game imho. Enjoy!
Lol it runs at 30 fps. If you want 60 it's 720p
@@iHaveTheDocumentsAt least it’s a stable 30 with even frametimes.
yeah.. looking on Horizon's performance on same PC of mine, especially.
U comparing this game to the game that came out two years ago??? Come on mate, use ur brain dude, give this game 10 years to fix
Yep see you in two years if it's fixed.
Wish more games had demos; or at least a standalone benchmarks; on PC so I can see how this ran prior to dropping money on it. The character creator was fun; but not really representative. I'm in the wait for patches camp even if I swore I was going to be playing this day one.
When are you gonna talk about REVIEWERS GIVING PERFECT SCORES TO TECHNICALLY IMPERFECT GAMES?
Until most reviewers refuse to hand out perfect scores to unpolished games, we will continue to see this sort of thing over and over again.
Forspoken levels of quality control.
It's not just PC, there are major performance issues on PS5. I've had my PS5 for almost two years, and Dragon's Dogma 2 is the first game that has ever actually crashed the console. I'm not talking about a screen freeze or blue screen error message, it hard crashes the PS5 to the point where the power suddenly cuts off and I have to reboot the console. Searching online this is a very common problem players are having with this game and ONLY this game. And yes, I've completely and thoroughly cleaned out any dust from my PS5, but the hard-crashing starts after I play DD2 for any extended period of more than a couple hours. Once it starts, it will not stop unless I cease playing DD2 for many hours. In the meantime, all other games I've tried on my PS5 work perfectly as normal. At this point I'm legitimately worried that continued play of DD2 is could potentially damage my PS5, if it hasn't already. What a pile of hot garbage from Crapcom.
Is this a reupload?
I really wanna buy it on steam but until capcom fixes the performacen issues I'll be waiting
Brute force memory management system, just like everything else.
Whats more interesting, truly, is how the DLSS3 mod\DLSS3 erases those stutters, and I mean erase.
The game is so good that I just ignore the performance issues. I would normally stop playing any game with issues but it's not game breaking and damn addictive. I await a performance patch from Capcom while I'm having a great time. Don't worry about it.
Honestly, I have known you guys are way more sensitive to frame-times than I tend to be and this release has made that really clear, because the most egregious thing about this game for me personally, by far, is the poor DLSS implementation with no properly functioning frame-gen(FG causes freezing for my rig unless I cap it to 60fps, which is not a good experience with AI frames), and the weird 'jitter'/'noise' that kind of happens in foliage(I think because of TAA). The foliage looks great, but it just starts having crazy conniption fits. I asked my buddy who has a 3080 & he experiences the same thing(I'm using a 4070).
The DLSS quality has a pretty poor resolve compared to what you see in most games these days. It just looks fuzzy. The last year or so I've been using DLSS where it is available in most games and have no issue with the crispness of the resolve, but this is just... It kind of makes 1440p look
I literally won't play a game which stutters. Traversal stutters in 2024 are pathetic. Maybe in 2008, it was mildly accepted in SOME games, but by 2014 - A DECADE AGO, I'd stopped playing ANY GAME which stuttered. And 2024? TWENTY TWENTY FOUR? No.
Tell devs to ask AI how to remove stutters, if they're unable to accept the date is 2024 and solve it themselves. Hardware is not the issue. Despite being shit for the date as aswell.
I remember when Doom 2016 came out, it ran so beautifully I actually enjoyed it on Seriers X AND PC - The Outer Worlds, I have yet to play, and I have tried.
This game needs a beefy CPU also. The AI scripts is heavily taxing on the CPU. When the CPU is heavily taxed the GPU can't preform optimally.
PS: If you're cool with 30 FPS lock this game runs smoothly. I have no problem after patch #1 on the PS5.
@DF Clips amd got frametime spike issues try an intel cpu much better just saying.
I’ve not seen any of these issues in this game. Using a 4070. I was surprised when a friend said he heard it had big issues. I was like haha mines fine. Only some slight problems in Vermund that I don’t really notice much.
Same but I have a delidded CPU and a 4090 on a water block lol
Why my performace has just gotten worse from day 1 even Outside city sometimes below 40fps.... running i9 10900k, boosted 5.3ghz 4080, 32G ram
(3600mhz)
4k .... also game installed on 990pro ssd
Yeah that’s a hardware issue bro. 14700k with RX 6700 XT and 32 GB of DDR4. Running at 1440p I don’t go below 55- 60 fps, even in the central city.
@@willbyrn5920 what part u suggest would be the issue?
@@Tonyholmsify your cpu is the bottleneck
@@willbyrn5920 probably amd gpu driver overhead is helping you out too
@@AlmondPOP i find it kind weird since in 4k resolution my cpu should not be problem in wilderness? 10900k should be bad at any means? Or am i missing something do i really get 10fps more if i upgrade to 14900k?
At this point I just wait at least 6 months after release and pick a game up on sale. No point buying at launch anymore. That goes for all games. It’s sad.
Performance is so messed up. I can be out in the wilderness with 60fps and then boom my frame rate is halved for no obvious reason 😮
this is spoiler , If you are in unmoored world which is the endgame area fps is kinda smooth there notedly there is no water in that area.
Biggest issue with the game is you out level the difficulty during ng+ and it becomes a pointless walking simulator. All they need to do is up the difficulty and improve exploration rewards.
I've pretty much stopped playing. I tried to get a steam refund, but of course I spent more than 2 hours trying different settings to try to get it to run well. 🤷♂
But the patch wasn’t supposed to fix performance. They just added a few minor options.They said in the patch notes that performance fixes are coming in a later patch. This smells like rage bait to me. There has just been so much of it around this game, with many outlets publishing grossly incorrect information to further the narrative . Apparently, rage bait sells.
It surely does..... not like unfinished games for the full price.
02:10 Nah, you're wrong. I prefer this over accidentally clicking/changing a setting and having to figure out what you changed. There are things to complain about with this game, and this is not it.
They should sell the Anti-Stutter Patch as a DLC/MTS :) Money money.
DLSS 3.6 mod and Frame generation mode hides those deeps pretty well in my opinion. 100fps in city 175 out in the open fighting. Fighting a dragon in the city at 125fps lol. Not a cure but make quality of life a little better.
Remember frame gen are just fake frames that’s just a lil smoother in motion. It’s not real performance
@@tjl1007 it’s works kinda like motion interpretation on your tv accept Breyer, It’s a lot smoother at a fake 100fps than at 65 lol.
@@tjl1007 if your base speed is nice Framegens works awesomely.
@@tjl1007 it’s like DLSS that’s fake too it’s not even the native Resolution you follow me.
@@tjl1007 Those who say "it's not real performance" want to argue that real performance means lower input latency as well as an fps jump, but when you turn on both Nvidia Reflex and Frame Generation you double your framerate, and your input latency is a lot lower than what originally had, so what the hell happened there then?
It's a bad argument. Like what is a "fake frame"? Every frame is fake. The game makes those. The only difference is Frame Generation uses AI.
AI generated frames look pretty much the same as the real ones, sometimes better because you may not be getting an artifact in a "fake" one, you but may be getting one in a "real" one, either because of TAA, motion blur or ray tracing. It happens, but to pretend that Frame Generation is something different to higher performance just because the technology itself doesn't lower your input latency is a bit too much. Like, at the end of the day, the game runs much better with the mod. It's day and night.
Great Game. But not for current gen hardware. Will pick it up in 5 years or so
im getting with my 3080ti 12700k 45fps in city! i cant play like that!!!!
I don’t get why digital foundry test games using the best hardware. Why don’t they do it with hardware that’s more in line with what the average consumer is going to have?
This is to show how bad it runs even on the best hardware. I still dont get the hype of this game, its extremely mid with 4-5 enemy types.
They do it sometimes, they used to have several builds for testing in past episodes, but it takes twice or thrice as long to test and release, but it would be a good thing.
@@Pandemonium088DD2 is far from a perfect game (it has many flaws), but at the same time you won't find any other game quit like it, it is a unique experience which no other company wants or even dares to produce.
My issue is the pathetic AI in this game. Not only the pawns, but the fact that they next to no adjustments for the enemies attacking you while you’re in a big fight. It can ruin the experience.
ive stopped playing until they fix ti
*"pretty good CPU utilization spread there..."*
??? BUT... the same software thread of code can jump between cores otherwise you'd see a single core at 100% showing where your CPU bottleneck is. It can actually be PREFERABLE to see a single core be fully utilized and have consistent access to the same CACHE etc... so I honestly don't quite understand why people think the load being "spread across the CPU's cores" is necessarily a good thing. You are seeing an AVERAGE here as well as in Task Manager. You could have a completely SINGLE-THREADED program jump between a 4c/4t CPU and show 25% CPU utilization of each core rather than 100% of a single core. That doesn't mean it's ideal.
I’ve been playing video games for over 20 years now and 1 thing I can definitely tell you from experience, I ABSOLUTELY HATE CAPCOM systems. I can’t even begin to tell you how much I hate the menus, unskippable cutscenes, and choices they make for their games. Every. Single. Game. I have played that was capcom came with it’s highs and headaches.
I have to literally mentally prepare myself before starting a capcom game. Even Resident Evil games!
If they specifically said " this patch will not improve performance" why are you guys making such a fuss?
I know right this was Qol patch
Because a patch that does improve performance should have been released before the game even left the testing stage
This game visually is nothing special, this is wildly demanding compared to other Capcom titles that look significantly better.
Because this is the only game that keeps track of literally every single NPC. Hell there's even a logbook for them. Also, I'm curious to know which other Capcom game has lighting at this level.
So developers killed this generation with buggy and bad performing games but we blame the consoles
Wow, did anyone think it's issues were actually going to be fixed by a patch 3 weeks after it's release?
If and its a big IF it get's fixed, it's will be many months down the line.
they released it without finishing.
Got to hit the financial year deadline by releasing a broken product.
That’s a very EA thing to do. Shame on them
This video confuses me and makes me questions digital foundry lol. Literally in the patch notes they said this patch wouldn’t do anything for performance, next one would. Like what lol.
The patch does mention minor performance, DLSS and framegen updates
So the outlook looks good for the main performance patch
It's confusing becuase this is all footage from their original video on March 22, I don't believe this is the most current patch. Go watch the original video about dragons dogma 2 and this is a rehash of the pc part of that video.
You always see AMD cpus in these. In my real world testing, Intel chips run better in these types of games that are CPU intensive. Better consistency and less frame time issues on Intel with Nvidia GPUs
Frame stuttering is annoying AF.
Fortunately this was not a performance patch
The way the game runs on a 4090 and 7800x3D LOOKS like how it should run on the PS5. This game looks so mediocre, how it can't get a stable 60fps is beyond me.
This game good but it’s long as hell. I’m sure most won’t finish it! 🤦🏾♂️
*ME in 2019* "This R9-3900x, 12-core CPU should age well when games get more THREADED and rely more on the number of cores rather than single-core performance!"
*ME in 2024* "When is the R7-9800X3D getting released so I can build a completely new PC to get 60FPS in modern games?"
*ME 30 seconds after above thoughts* "...meh, just won't buy any new games that don't perform well on my R9-3900x + RTX4070. Problem solved."
superiority complex
My PC runs it in smooth 4k 60fps even without DLSS no matter the number of NPCs. No traversal stutter. Shader compilation occurred in less than a minute.
The menu seems optimised for the D-pad on controller.
Even I’m talking about the launch version.
Do you think MSI-Ab and RTSS are helping stabilise the frame times?
7950x3D (on CLD1) and RTX 4090.
I have a PS5, and I'm trying to decide whether to buy a gaming rig or Series X
*Gaming PC*
Pros:
more high res 60fps gaming options.
Access to Playstation (delayed), Xbox, and third-party titles, as well as roms
Longer relevance (don't need to upgrade as frequently as console)
Cons:
Very expensive.
Regular poorly optimized PC ports.
Setup and install takes some effort
Likely to have install setup issues at some point
*Series X*
Pros:
Relatively cheaper than PC
Very convenient. No setup issues
Cons:
Lower res lower performance.
Pay to play online except free to play games.
Need to buy a console every generation.
No playstation bangers, obviously.
I just moved back to PC. Got tired of controller and low fps.
6:38 wasn't that the conclusion you gave for console performance in the original video? I thought that was the case. For those who don't know: he took that clip from another video. I know it can apply to PC, but I wouldn't say I would stop playing because "oops! a drop to the 50s for a second there! I can't belive this". Like, you said that after showing the drops Xbox had to the 20s. That ran better than PS5 btw.
This is the full context of the clip. Alex said: "If you run the same sequence on the Xbox Series X, it also runs very poorly with bad frametimes. The avarage performance was 10% worst than that which I found on the Ryzen 5 3600. The Xbox is not going to be running max settings here, of course, but I'm just showing this Xbox footage to you here to prove that you can get quite better results on PC, as long as you have a more modern Ryzen or Intel chip, so city performance here is going to be very controversial, and I think many people might just stop playing the game as soon as they get to this area, as it's kind of...", and you can hear the rest in this video.
So yeah, I thought you were talking about Xbox or very low-end CPUs. Not even the Ryzen 3600, which is low-end, is having the drops you're getting on Xbox or PS5. Those were in the low 20s.
What, no "worst PC port of the year so far" moniker?? 😅
Gee, it’s almost like the same company that thought it was a good idea to load their 15+ year old back catalog with sketchy Russian malware thought it was fine to release a game like this 🤔
This has to be the worst generation by far. Anyone wanting to play current gen-only AAA PC games is essentially fcked.
Nobody gives a shit about optimizing their mess for PC and we pretty much have to wait for next generation's hardware to be able to brute-force their crappy performance.
I haven't had a single performance problem on ps5 with over 90 hours.
This is objectively untrue. You may not notice them as much as other people but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there. It drops into the low 20s on PS5.
I've had constant hard-crashing on PS5, as have lots of other players.
Runs fine on my gtx 760 . I get 90+ everywhere , even in cites.
Not acceptable at all gonna stay away until they learn how to optimise a pretty basic old looking game.
ive got an old pc and im not mad about the performance people online are all insane
Just wait for them to re-release the game with Dark Arisen 2 or whatever bs edition they put out.
Check it again when Denuvo is removed.
Level 50 and no complaints or issues. I think the problems other people are having are due to monitoring (e.g., FPS) which is distracting them from enjoying this unique and exciting game. I'm loving the Pawn antics and random encounters.
Lazy af devs...
Game looks and plays fine y'all just love crying unless it's 120fps
Looks fine, yes, but when you have an i9 14900k and 4090 you shouldn't be dropping into the 50's
@@slickrickwillyjames if unhappy return/refund
Is the game running at 119fps? No its not it is barely hitting 30fps and cant hit 60fps even on pc
It's just bad optimization. Most games nowadays..
No one tell Alex this game has jiggle physics.
He would clutch his pearls and scream if he found out. He hates the female body, but if you saw those pics of him u would realize he enjoys men not women.
Is it just me, or are Japanese studios just utter crap at making PC versions of games?
Yakuza/like a dragon runs phenomenal on pc but I think it's because pc gaming isn't popular in Japan ( most Japanese are on ps or switch) that's probably why devs either don't care about pc or they don't know how to optimize for pc and I think it's the latter because like I said the yakuza games runs phenomenal on pc but it's not like western devs are any better especially in recent years
Really? Nah? The game has major problems and it hasnt been fixed in 2 weeks? I'm absotoodelydootly shocked. Come on guys. Yes, the game shouldn't have released this way in the first place, but nothing broken gets fixed immediately. The fact that most of you seem to think this should be fixed already means you have unrealised expectations and have no clue how software development works and how much effort it is. Wait 6 months or a year and then check in. You won't be losing anything by delaying playing a single player game for later.
Really? Your take is "wait 6 months or a year and then check in"? How about the giant development companies like Crapcom actually release a game that is not BROKEN in the first place? Nah? We live in Clown World 2024 where a basic customer expectation of a functional product is now labeled as "entitlement".
Apparently PC master race is king, or is it a myth? Yeah it's an old myth, get a console 🤣🤣
Haters gonna hate
No issues at all on PS5, if it is any, i haven't paid attention 'cause you are busy playing a damn great game!! Sorry for you on PC have so much "problems"😂 people are so spoiled these days.
"No issues at all on my PS5".
The game has a poor NPC draw distance caused by the CPU bottleneck and the game's bad optimization, a lot of drops to 20 FPS on cities and won't go past 40 FPS at any moment, so you'll get Screen-Tearing even with VRR because consoles only support when the game runs at 48 FPS or higher. Yeah, "no problems". You're either blind or you have been playing very bad performing games like Star Wars: Jedi Survivor or Gotham Knights. You can enjoy the game but it's full of issues on all platforms. Even DF said that the game doesn't feel great to play on the console version on their analisis at all because all of those issues.
Lmao it better not for trash 30fps. Are u seriously trying it right now? And most say it's like 26 fps, not that a pony would know what fps means. The game is good, but console simps have no room to judge anything about pc.
Two weeks already since the launch of the game, not second patch yet, and the first one didn't address crashes and performance issues, Capcom support post-launch is being even more dissapointing.
They said the first patch wouldn't address performance tbf.
@@NotCharAznable I know, but were still waiting for the second update and for them to address this issues, there's people who couldn't even play the game because it crashes for them you know¿?
Tbf, that's no excuse, there are smaller dev teams working faster in supporting their own games, for example Helldivers 2 devs, or Baldur's Gate 3 devs (very fast and reliable also with the support post launch) and here you have Capcom who hasn't fixed almost anything two weeks later post launch, just releasing one patch until the moment, what can I say they are slow as a turtle xD