Which 3 Countries Are Objectively The Worst?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 дек 2020
- *Technically you can argue there's no better or worse, just differences but I would argue North Korea is objectively worse to live in than New Zealand, even if it's hard to work out why
/ toycat - Subreddit community! For discussions on all the things you see on this channel
Check out my main channel at / ibxtoycat
Also on twitter @ibxtoycat
When you took up a random street view in Norway and said "I bet some tragic stuff happens here" you were just two blocks away from the terrorist bomb attack in Oslo 2011.
I for one agree with myself that terrorism is tragic
@@ibx2cat which in your opinion really is the worst country?
england is the worst because they have luton and manchester
@@Shrek_Has_Covid19 Here's a man who's never heard of Belgium.
@@Nabium bruh have you seen birkenhead show any signs of weakness and a kid will shank you in the neck a five year old could buy cocaine there
"Let's focus on djibouti"- toycat
Mmmmm Djibouti
I love a d ji bouti
Who’s bouti?
i wanna slap ur djabooty
Djibouti has lotsa naval bases, IYKWIM.
Being small isn't necessarily a problem for security. San Marino is arguably the most consistently stable and peaceful nation that's ever existed.
Wasnt San Marino a country when the east roman empire (i dont know how to spell “byzantine”) was still a thing?
@@ericktellez7632 yes
It's of 0 use
@Konstantin M I don't think they're too lazy to incorporate it, I believe San Marino was guaranteed independence from Italy due to their role in assisting Giuseppe Garibaldi and the Italian nationalist movement during unification.
@Konstantin M San Marino people don't want to be italian, they prefer to be indipendent. Even though they're basically Italian, they prefer to be their own country
Feels unfair. Population and land area are nowhere near as important as wealth and life expectancy.
@Adolf Hitler I'd be still living in a megapolis just as well if like half the country suddenly disappeared, so not really
Although I think population density is a lot more important than population. Like population really doesn’t effect how life is but if you’re living in a place with high population density then you’re gonna own less space, if you combine a high population density with poverty you’re going to have a bad quality of life. I don’t think land really effects it but population density which is a combination of the two probably is a bit more important than the two combined. I also disagree about the way he did population, yes having a smaller population means you’re less of an economic powerhouse, but surely most people would rather live in Canada (arround 5 million ppl) than China or India.
edit: I just read this a year later and dont know tf I was on about. I dont know how on earth I thought any of this wasnt complete bullshit. ignore this comment, I nolonger agree with what I wrote, and it is only still up so that the comments correcting me have context for random people reading through.
@@ibetillforgetthis there are some really dense places with high quality of life like Western Europe. And then you have just as nice places like Canada.
It can be a good or a bad factor, depending on context
@@ibetillforgetthis Population density isn't a great metric either though, since you could make arguments being pro-population density and anti-population density. Also, Canada's population is ~38 million, not 5 million
@@archdukefranzferdinand567 oh sorry I got mixed up with Norway.
Comoros main island looks like gta 5 map
i think living there is also like gta 5
The land area really limits the scope of this video. Djibouti,eSwatini, and Comoros aren’t great, but there are legitimately so much worse countries. If I were to do a ranking it would be 1. South Sudan
2. Central African Republic
3. Yemen
Yemen made my list at #2. I put North Korea ahead of it, and Somalia at #3. CAR or South Sudan may deserve to be number 2. They can't beat NK because at least you can flee South Sudan and CAR. I know CAR has had war for years and much of it is in anarchy like Somalia. South Sudan was at war with Sudan, but I think they're at peace. I believe they have a famine now. Toycat can make another video comparing these 4 countries.
@@AndyZach I agree. There are many candidates for the worst as well, and I didn’t take abject authoritarianism into full account when I ranked the top three.
I'm a South Sudanese 🇸🇸 and i agree with u
@@monojakennedy_3758 I feel for you guys. Hope you guys find peace and stability in the coming years 🇸🇸
@@nathanielthrush5581 Thanks a lot.
Hopefully we will enjoy lasting peace like the rest of the world
Nobody:
Toycat at Christmas:
"What is the worst Country in the World ?"
The best gift anyone could ask for.
666 likes...
@@foxtail286 😱
haha ha! im so funi becuz i added nobody!!!1!1!!1!1!1!1!!
I'm from Belize and its sad to see my country so many times there the only thing I have to say is that it is nice to have your neighbors far away but yeah our GDP is low mainly because of corruption. btw we do speak English here in central America.
Instead of GDP, it would have been better to use GDP per capita.
Djibouti, for instance, is one of the richest countries in Africa.
GDP per capita isn’t a useful index. Equatorial Guinea has the highest GDP per capita in Africa, but due to extreme corruption and other issues it is still one of the poorest countries in the world, and GDP per capita also DOES NOT mean a wage or salary or net worth, it is literally just GDP divided by total population. Not a very helpful measurement if you ask me
@@xSRGman
Of course it's not. I actually meant something more similar to national wealth per capita because it's way way more accurate than national wealth.
Obviously it's way better to live in Monaco than India, despite the national wealth of India is ridiculously higher than Monaco's
@@xSRGman Still more useful than GDP alone. Plus it tells you pretty much all the basics on wealth and wealth distribution if you combine it with a measure of inequality.
A better index would be average wage of lowest 20% or 10%. A country is good if its poorest people are treated well.
Palestine.
I think the area rating isn’t helpful
agreed. Singapore, Qatar, Bahrain, Vatican, Luxembourg, Monaco, San Marino, Andorra, Malta, etc are all great countries to live in
@@somethung8188 Being poor on its own and small area on its own don’t have to be that bad. But if you combined those two together it’s worse then just those separated categories. Because if you are rich, you have options to move out and travel the world, so your small area for you doesn’t matter. But if you are poor, your options to travel are limited. Even by fact, that other countries don’t want you. So you might get denied access.
So if you are poor, would you rather be in big country where you can move around (going on walk in nature is free), than living in some ghetto full of people. If Singapore looked like Gaza strip, you would also wanted it bigger to get out of ghetto for a while.
@@stafer3 Although I agree to an extent, I don't think size weighs that heavily simply because some bigger countries are absolutely AWFUL to live in. Take South Sudan, Yemen and Somalia for example. To me these are the absolute worst countries ( to live in ) and all are pretty big. In these scenarios, the situations are so fucked up that the size of the country doesn't even matter. Also, India is a huge country and yes it's popular and is very politically strong but is not a good place to live in at all despite its very rich and diverse culture and history
@@somethung8188 I think size may be a better measure of potential than anything else. Small countries really have to play their cards perfectly (like Singapore) to do well. Otherwise they’re basically hanging onto the coattails of their neighbors and hoping for the best (most European microstates).
Nor is the population rating
If Slough was independent it would be in first place
@@robertcrawshaw9978 close second
@@robertcrawshaw9978 i live near Scunthorpe. It is not that bad. You only see 5 stabbings, 3 teenage pregnancies and a rape every hour
@@lifetruthseeking5808 Ah see, not so bad
@@lifetruthseeking5808 still better than Detroit
As a Londoner I wish Slough was independent... just get that place out of my country at all costs.
"Mogadishu is perfectly safe" I'm sorry what
he wants to go there, because the advise for tourists is : don't go there, you will die, stay at your hotel, and pay private armed bodyguard.
(but he will probably not go there)
@@tommarch.4493 Oh I'm fully aware, but he made a video about it, asking "should i go there? I'll let you decide in the comments" and the comments were a unanimous "no" so I'm confused
@@tommarch.4493 he did go there
@Greater Somalia what?
@Greater Somalia I just said "he did go there"
I have friends who live in the Camoros. It's not that bad. But they are French, so maybe it's Mayotte. I think size is a bad indicator. The largest countries tend to have the worse hellholes.
what large countries are the worst hellholes? Russia, The U.S.A, Brazil, China, I have some problems with them, but I wouldn't call any of them a hellhole especially the U.S and Russia.
@@noahmiller4780 I imagine he meant countries like the DRC, and some of the other larger African nations that ranked low on the other lists. To be fair though, China does have "re-education" camps, so it can be a real hellhole depending on who you are.
@@noahmiller4780 I didn't say that the larger countries are hellholes, but I am saying they often contain hellholes. There are quite a few places in America that are quite rough now and getting rougher by the year. Cities and counties that would make anything on this little list seem quite friendly by comparison. Likewise Russia, China, Brazil, Nigeria, India etc. It takes the press of numbers to really get the nightmares flowing. I've lived in both New York City and Alaska. Guess which one had the most troubling conditions?
@@noahmiller4780 those countries have pockets of hellholes but to dismiss them entirely as hellholes is unfair. It’s the cities you’re going to, not the entire country.
Some
"The stereotype that Africa is poor is kind of outdated"
proceeds to show that the poorest countries by life expectancy 90% of the time come from Africa.
There's no smoke without fire
Every stereotype has some truth in it
@@scintillatingmass8860 Its not that hard to grow from nothing. many places in Africa are still living like they have been for hundreds of years. With them popping kids out everywhere of course the general economy is going to increase, that doesn't meant the GDP per capita is.
All of Africa, that is 54 countries has a combined GDP lesser than France.
Yeah, overall the continent is poor, but people act like all of Africa is this muddy shithole, when in reality, the big cities have booming economies and strong political influence. Addis Ababa, Nairobi, Pretoria, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Tunis, Rabat, and Algiers are all very wealthy cities that are safe to travel to. Obviously there’s gonna be slums, with the amount of people packed into a continent with such a harsh landscape, it was never going to end well. That’s why so many people migrated away from it in the early ages, because they knew it would not be able to support their nations or cultures.
@@supmaidoods8753 true in this case but untrue in almost every other
i dont think you shoud do area as then we will just get small countryes,
Or population
well a bad country is one with no population and no area. small population means small work force, small area means small leverage and resources.
@@tunzinia8160 Perhaps do population per sq. Km. Then you could have included some of the countries with large area, but very low population, such as those that are mostly desert, mountains, or jungle.
I'd think deciding based on the following might be better:
Population per sq. Km
Income per capita/GPA
Life expectancy
Government/Civil stability
@@yoyoman_blue6485 well, then india, russia and chaina shoud be one of the best countryes in the world right?
@New New Milo i am trying, english is my 4th language
Syria might be the worst. Not only is there a war going on but you can’t make withdrawals from banks.
sure, but exactly how bad ddepends on where you are. deir ez zour is a significantly worse place to live than the rest of the country because it was under seige for years and bombed to shit, while many areas never really saw intense fighting. ant the war is nearly over now. meanwhile, there are places like yemen where their entire country is blockaded from the est of the world and being attacked by a significantly stronger country with no end to the war in sight.
@@cageybee7221 Yup, in some places it’s really bad, but in most places in Syria is very safe. In fact, I would argue that it’s safer than some places in the United States because there is not much non-war-related violence. In fact, I think a lot of Syrians are happy because of the one thing Syria has that the West doesn’t: strong family connections. In the West, the family has broken down. Western society is all about work, sex, and short-term pleasure, leaving no room for family and leaving people empty inside. In Syria, your family is your support and that support is stronger than any social net in the richest welfare state.
@@michaelibrahim9275 Oh shut up. Syria is an active warzone and it's better because they love their families more, apparently? It couldn't be that extreme situations would naturally drive families closer together because they offer support freely. That in places where there isn't a war raging familial bonds are a little bit looser because people naturally seek freedom from the expectations and responsibilities of family when they feel secure because they don't have an ACTIVE WAR HAPPENING IN THEIR COUNTRY.
@@Toastybees What I’m saying is about the parts of Syria that AREN’T an active war zone which is the vast majority of the country. The parts that are currently still at war are a small sparsely populated pocket in south eastern Syria, and Northern Syria. 90% of Syrians currently live in an area where the war has passed already. My heart goes out to all those people in the war torn areas and the people in Aleppo, for whom the war is over but the long reconstruction has just begun. Those people are indeed suffering, but notice how I said SOME Syrians. I am not downplaying the suffering of the people caught in the war, but I’m just saying that I feel like when you don’t consider the war, the Syrian people and culture lead to a less depressing lifestyle
@@michaelibrahim9275 Lmao no nothing about arranged marriages and three generations of families living in the same house is less depressing.
The area of a country does not tell us anything about how “good” a country is. Singapore, San Marino, Luxembourg, , Lichtenstein, Andorra, Monaco are all wealthy, stable, safe and secure countries....among the best in the world by almost all quality of life measures.
I think this video is about 3 weakest nations in the world
If you want how good a country is then criterias should be Happiness index,GDP per capita, Infrastructure,Life expectancy, literacy,how stable country is ,crime rates etc
@@priyanshgautam9971 the title say the three “worst”, not the weakest.
@@itsjustme4848 Yeah that's what I say title is misleading actually it should be *Three most weakest nations in the world*
Smaller means it's much easier to manage , control , evacuated the people in said nation. And Singapore is inside "the typhoon shield" meaning countries like indo and Philippines are taking the hit..and it is also the reason why ph is hard to manage since every October to December is like a reset button and its size doesn't help
All useless and irrelevant.
Did you mix up Botswana and Zimbabwe on the map of the poorest countries? I was under the impression Botswana was relatively rich and well run.
Yeah
Botswana has such a small population that the country's economy / wealth becomes very small.
But according to statistics, Botswana is on the same level as poorer EU countries. Which makes it one of the absolute best countries in Africa. One problem, however, is that the assets are very unevenly distributed.
They are relatively well run.
it is !
by gdp
North Korea: *I can’t be worst if I don’t report*
North Korea the country everyone has an opinion about not knowing that all “info” they get comes from their enemies.
@@bokhans and people who have escaped the country and almost killing themselves by doing it... I believe their story more than North Koreas enemies or allies.
"The smallest countries in the world are not in Europe" -toycat
Vatican City: Am I a joke to you?
Also, Monaco, Liectenstein, Andorra, Malta, San Marino...
@@neyte7313 Luxembourg:..........
Im surprised Vatican City hasn't been raided by now
Like the airport takes up like 1/3 of the entire country
@@lairoslairoslairos the entire country is 1/45 of the size of JFK airport
Even the main airport in my 3rd world country is almost 20x the size of Vatican city
Someone's going to comment their opinion without watching the video and start a massive flame war, I guarantee it
This is a terrible argument, but yeah
You can't fix dumb.
Your name just matches what you just said
"Yur DoMb AmERIca is ThE WoRt CoRNtrY EvER"
@@ilikemyowncommentsyoushoul6101 , no
Statistically speaking there wouldn't be a deadly scooter accident in norway on the day you recorded this - norway has about 110 traffic deaths per year (+-10), or about two per week, or once every 3.5 days... (yeah, the nordic countries has seriously low traffic deaths per year - sweden is at about 250 per year (so statistically a traffic accident will happen on a given day, but not on three consecutive days)).
(Another map-things if you run out of things? Lowest number of traffic deaths per year per capita?)
Wow, in the US we have around 100 traffic deaths _per day._ One of the downsides of being a car dependent nation.
@@PongoXBongo well, the US also has a way bigger population. If you take that into account the US only has 5 times more traffic deaths per capita
Since you were ranking countries in terms of being "powerful" rather than good places to live in, you should have included some measurement of military size or power-projection.
BTW, I live in Trondheim, Norway, and scooters are everywhere, especially in the city centre. They are especially bad for the blind, and old people obviously like to complain about them. But it seems like it's here to stay. It's weird how much Norway has changed from being ban-happy on these things. In the '80s, skateboards were banned, and segways were illegal for several years.
The wealth index is a good proxy for military might. You can safely assume the poorest nations are the least powerful militarily.
@@AndyZach *north korean laughs*
@@thorthewolf8801 Yeah, I thought of them. They use most of their wealth for their military. They also don't feed their soldiers--they're expected to scavenge.
@@AndyZach there's still a wide range. The Israeli military is probably better than the current German military despite Germany having ten times the gdp.
Btw Djibouti is the one with the crazy national anthem. Not Eswatini, for those of you going to look it up
A slight tangent but I find it a bit funny that it would be even possible to get copyright claimed for playing a national anthem 😄 I just can't for the life of me figure out a reason why
15:46
"They don't have many natural resources, I'll take that away from them"
Why you gotta do this, toycat?
I wonder how he'll work it out. Presumably France is all 3 of the 3 worst countries.
In my dreams I can make that video and get away with it
the french are terrible at governance.
Nah it’s 2/3 because Belgium is the final one
Having travelled through some the villages of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh by car, it's fascinating to see how objectively "cash poor" areas can thrive and work. Passing through one village that was effectively a bunch of longhouses with a water butt at the top of the hill, I was amazed at how little suffering I saw. Only a passing observation, but people were just going about living as a community without the trappings we see in many other places. I saw much worse things in big cities where you'd catch the familiar MacDonalds and Subways had sprung up. Not sure I can draw any safe conclusions from this but I found it interesting how communities can seemingly thrive off the grid of globalization.
agree that people can find happines and live peaceful lives without the new luxuries and facilities which globalization has brought forth, though unfortunately bad traditions are still followed more in those parts such as untouchability, infanticide based on sex, caste system, and exploitation and social exclusion of the poorer and the lower castes(such as Shudras).
Unstated is the grinding labor of daily fetching water and lack of toilet facilities and attendant diseases.
@@ipadair7345 I agree, I'm sure their lives aren't perfect or easy, however, in preparing myself for extreme poverty, having seen some in cities, I was taken aback by how functional it all seemed. Of course, I didn't live a day in their shoes, maybe that would have given me more perspective. As a brit, I have some vague understanding that we probably made the problems with the caste system worse. Which is why I was quite surprised at how little antipathy was shown at that, rather we were greeted warmly, with some curiosity, but not asked for anything aside from pictures together. It was an interesting road trip, for sure.
@@sohatyi because people there are on there own. they have no welfare state to lean on while unemployed. whether or not they eat that day depends on their own labor or the goodwill of neighbors or relatives.
@@AndyZach Toilet access is no longer as pressing an issue in rural areas seeing as 99% of the population has access to toilets
Another terrific video!
North Korea without a doubt and than most African nations aren't very desirable places
Papua New Guinea isn’t a desirable place either.
Turkmenistan also
North korea actually isn't as bad as many think, it is very bad but not THAT bad
North Korea is a country few if any has visited but everyone has an opinion about not knowing that everything they think they know about the country comes from North Korea’s enemies. Yes I have been in the country 12 days and to NK territory another 25 times.
@@waltervondervogelweide4638 it’s not bad if you’re rich and light skinned. If you’re poor, religious, gay, dark skinned, outspoken, or literally anything else that their leader considers undesirable, you’re fucked.
6:28 The way the editor perfectly lined up the 2 maps pleases me.
I really don't agree with this analysis. Area and population should absolutely not be factors, and the status of whether the country is in a war or has had a war recently should be replaced. Comoros failing is in many ways it's own fault. Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius are all in the similar situations to Comoros. They are all small, located in the Indian Ocean, have colonial histories, have small populations, have few natural resources, and are made up of many islands. However, Mauritius, the Maldives, and the Seychelles were able to make themselves tourist hotspots, which is a major source of income in all three of the countries.
You live in the UK, can take a train/drive there, and have only been to Paris once? That's surprising.
It is about 2.5 hours from my house to Paris, but I can't say the city is of interest to me always
Paris is one of the shittist famous cities in the world its so disappointing to Go there.
I don't think toycat is interested in getting mugged.
I disagree, more people doesn't mean more success, I think people would be much happier at population densities about 20X lower than what is considered normal now and that happiness would equate to success
Right... especially in African nations
I see what your saying but when we are talking about Africa, population growth is actually a very important factor
More people means more thinkers and more workers. Both are needed to support a modern post-industrial nation.
What about Guinea-Bissau? I saw them on all 4 lists as well, and they’re even worse off because they’ve actually seen a lot of conflict compared to the 3 on this list
I'd say that North Korea should be highlighted on the lowest national wealth countries map but it'd be hard to find the data.
north korea is only 200 on the worlds economic rankings
@@frankyboy8513 In North Korea a doctor earns a dollar a month equivalent so out of the 195 officially recognized nations I wouldn't say North Korea is near to the rich side. Maybe they could only collect data on the elites or something.
@@golden_gloo 200 is pretty bad though out of 210 measured countries/territories being 200 is not good. Yeah sure doctor earns a dollar a month but you can find countries where doctors own 10.$ a month. "Poor" doesn't mean "poorest"
North Korea doesn't really send data . And they're is no way of proving the data they did send were true , tho the North Koreans population is actually more stable then the south which is shocking
@@arichan7599 I'd say the most reliable sauce of data from North Korea would come from defectors as when people would do anything to flea your country that's a sign that things aren't exactly comfortable.
The only thing wrong with Djibouti is that the country’s first language is french despite the fact that most people speak somali, afar or Arabic in there. People aren’t doing good in schools, education and everything else in the government as it’s difficult to learn a foreign language when everyone else speaks your native languages!
Is low population objectively a bad thing though? I think you could make a case for it being beneficial in certain places
For developing country yes
@@saintkun2708 Does the metric mentioned in the video adjust for area? Is it density or absolute population?
my exact thoughts, this video definitely isn’t objective lol
it's great because people suck
Low population might mean that the country has a lower birth rate which is a good thing for poor countries
I think the HDI would’ve been useful for this, and other composite indexes perhaps
Obviously this video is just for fun... but just my two cents!
I don't think so countries like South Africa and Algeria has high HDI but their 50% is living below poverty
And one of the highest unemployment rate
Guyana and Gabon are more examples
Did he say "blaming every world problem on colonization is not valid", how dare he!!! But seriously, no doubt colonization was awful and has caused many unforgivable blunders but you can't just blame colonization and look the other way, while the ones responsible launder billions out of the country, unfortunately this is the case in most of these poor african nations.
Blaming colonialism is a useless truth. I would argue that the vast majority of the issues in African nations were caused, either directly or indirectly, by colonialism, but that doesn't solve anything. Blaming colonialism is about as useful as blaming aliens in terms of actually solving the issues.
Look at Zimbabwe
i should probably say why. Zimbabwe was one of the last colonial possessions that was given independence. Almost immediately after gaining independence, it started "decolonisation" and replaced all of the white farmers with Zimbabwean people. However, most people didn't know how to farm or wanted to farm, thus leading to the country only making 10% of what it used to. This also lead to hyperinflation
It's called Austerity now
That’s not true at all. It’s not colonization that was the issue. It was crap countries like Spain and France colonizing them. British former colonies for the most part are very good countries, but most of what the other countries left behind are terrible countries. It has to do with the colonizer
California has a larger economy than Africa by half a trillion dollars but about 3% of the population, the vast majority of Africa is still really poor even if their are some relatively decent areas now.
the Netherlands has over 1/3 of the gdp of Africa despite being 1/733 the size. the wealth gap is truly insane.
Who will you blame?
The colonizers?
@@cp12298 You can only blame the past for so long. At some point, you need to look to yourself to explain lack of success.
*In reality, Somalia, Haiti, and Venezuela are probably the worst.*
I'd swap either Venezuela or Haiti with North Korea
@@AtlasTheGarbage Both are pretty bad.
Haiti seems out of place. It's not a good place to live, but it's surely better than Syria, North Korea, etc.
Nah. Yemen, Somalia, and South Sudan. or along those lines. I disagree with NK being bottom 3 because the major problem is freedom of speech but that aside it's not bottom 3 bad. Its life expectancy shows this, which is actually average.
@@somethung8188 It's not just freedom of speech, it's other fundamental rights like freedom of information. They miss the majority of the articles on the UN declaration of rights and freedoms. North Korea is basically the closest humanity has gotten to Ingsoc
A country that lost their culture, history knowledge and identity, for me, is the worst, even it is rich and big
Agree
Papua New Guinea?
@@thetrickster9885 it's not that big.
@@caim3465 What bout Canada?
@@caim3465 China? India?
The list should be remade based on, per capita income, life expectancy, happiness index, crime rate, and infrastructure.
always the right amount of comedy in these videos, very nice
I love watching how ecstatic he can talk about anything geographical and how knowledgable he is of so many topics. It's always great fun watching these videos
I'm sorry to hear that Swaziland is no more. It will be missed.
Swaziland remains the same country but it has a new name, eSwatini.
@@SlapstickGenius23 I've always thought that all of this rebranding with an 'e' in front of brand to make it seem you're modern and connected is a mistake. Do people really need to call books 'ebooks' just because they aren't on paper?
@@3506Dodge He just made a typo chill out
@@hooliganfanatic7241 nah the country is literally renamed eSwatini although it’s usually rendered Eswatini and many countries don’t recognize the change
@@3506Dodge in the native language of Eswatini the country is just eSwatini (with the second letter capitalized), but in English it's just Eswatini
i did not expect a video from eswatini talking about eswatini
Wait this is a second channel? How do I find the first channel?
Inspired by your video, I looked at the worst 20 countries (excluding territories) on GDP (ppp) per capita, Democracy Index, Homicide rate and Fragile Country Index and the only country to appear in all 4 was Central African Republic.
this channel is like that one person that you thought you never had so much in common
this channel is like that annoying friend who thinks he knows everything about geography
Lol, I 100% expected you'd zoom into Comoros and there'd be at least something nice since it is a point of interest, probably a nice skyscraper or something like you might see in Nairobi but nope, it looks terrible, trash everywhere, everything falling down.
How do I get this map
How did you get to know all this? I’m very curious
This is the second or third time of you saying how you could die.
My initial guesses were North Korea, Dr Congo and Somalia. I think I'm still right.
i’m loving all these videos
do you have adhs?
If this doesn't list the Philippines, this list is wrong.
Philippi is my last name :(
This list isn't about human trafficking, sry maybe next time.
@@lilfreezie6302 And police brutality
Opinion before watching: Somalia, Central African Republic, Afghanistan
Mine was: Somalia, Chad and Afghanistan
@@t_nicki why chad in particular?
@@maddies_he4rt he stole my gf🙁
@@maddies_he4rt the country is very dangerous
@@t_nicki certainly not more dangerous than somalia or afghanistan, and there’s plenty of active war zones or generally unsafe countries that rank way higher than chad there. chad’s pretty much just your run of the mill poor autocracy
"Lets see, watch shall I watch this Christmas morning while I get dressed. Ooo, toy cat uploaded 'Which 3 Countries Are Objectively The Worst?' for Christmas, 'cos of course he did..." xD
can you pretty please mr lord toycat do a video on brics and canzuk and stuff on those lines
the intro is amazing. i never realized how good it is. its like right out of an educational public broadcast network
Hey
I just met you
And this is crazy
but here’s my number
So call me maybe
It's hard to look right at you baby
Can you do a simmilar video for which countries are objectively the best
People will assume I'm playing favourites in some way no matter how I try I think lol
@@ibx2cat I think you could use just the most specific examples to metric a developed good country as HDI, GDP Per Capita PPP for inflation and cost of living in every country parity, stability index, life expectancy, happiness index, Gini Coefficient for view how unequal the income is and some infrastructure metric and that's it
Funny he went to street view in Comoros attempting to make the point that it's probably a normal place and you see this hotel that looks like it's been burned out and trash everywhere on the street
TIL Belize is pronounced "Guyana".
from what I understand, you are pronounced Comoros correctly
looks like we need Biffa t0 do a traffic fix on Djibouti
Big shout out to the 'Whaaaat is this, a crossover episode?" line, one of the best from Bojack Horseman.
i think my country would on the bottom sadly 🇸🇴
Congrats! Assuming that's the Somalian flag then u didn't make bottom 3!
@@haruhifujioka5952 well 60% of Djibouti's population is Somali so I've still taken a massive L
Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan
except Pakistan isn't bad?
When he zoomed in on that ‘VIP Club’ and said it’s not that bad lol can’t tell if he’s joking. The place looks like it has no windows and it’s called a ‘VIP Club’
So what does the thumbnail mean? Does it show the countries that are in war? Because my country is red on that map😳
Definitely not us. Like one of our songs says:
*My country is the best*
Mazel tov, Dear Leader!!!
Stockholm County has about 2.3 million people while Iceland has like 360 thousand people so Stockholm County had like 6-7 times the population of whole of Iceland which I find interesting
3:05 yeah but have you checked per capita GDP?
Djibouti also has a good national anthem
Antarctica is the worst it just keeps on melting
Yeah I hate that country
I feel like wealth of the citizenry is a better indication of “worst” country than national wealth because of mismanagement and corruption of the government...Venezuelan people never see any of the money their country gets (and even that is low now)
average income is an awful tell. For instance according to statistics of average income Iceland should be the least poor country. yet looking at poverty statistics iceland is only 20th in terms of lowest so no thats not good
@@frankyboy8513 I didn’t say we should be looking at average income
“Wealth of the citizenry” refers to a lot of different metrics that includes per capita income but also takes into account debts, purchasing power of their currency, home market, etc
@@KiwiKrazyable GDP per capita PPP to take in count the inflation and price disparity and Gini coefficient for metric the inequality rate
Dude you should play GeoGuesser and make videos playing it!!
It's extremely noteworthy that Mayotte has the exact same drawbacks as Comoros, and yet, Mayotte is successful and Comoros is not.
You can't say price fluctuations are to blame and just saying that 'coups don't help.'
Had the Comoros remained under France, it would be far wealthier.
england
britain
united kingdom
i dont think it works that way
I can't believe the 2 replies above me can't understand the joke
anyone else hate how new Zealand is always covered up by toy cat in the bottom right corner
New what? Can you bring up a real country.
Stop mentioning lord of the rings expanded universe kingdoms. They’re not real places 🥱
Not really, I'm hiding.
I was worried about Western bias in this list and basically expecting Africa, China, North Korea, and Russia as the worst countries.
“Someone is going to die on a scooter today. I wish it could be me?!”
I'm from Serbia and I can say this place is pretty much hell on Earth.
Ma cili balkan je pakao
More like purgatory, an absurd and tragicomic purgatory. You can leave, but you always leave something behind.
Living in western china is like living in a Orwell novel
there's probably billions of videos made, but youtube cannot decide what videos to pump out to recommend me on this video
At this point i watch IBXtoycats geography videos more than his gaming videos
"having alot of people in a country can make the country successful"
Estonia with 1.3m people: doubt
india with 1.1 bilion people xdoubt
@@malvahalva9610 India is an economic powerhouse with a domestic space program. I'd say they're doing OK.
The earliest I've been on a toycat video lol
Djibouti: "so we have control of trade because of location. good."
neighbor: "I am the captain now"
6:36 I knew I'm not the only one who calls it "Doctor Congo"
Toycat is uploading videos like a factory
Keep it up
Nothing some more colonization can't fix
Funny how well it worked the first time. Maybe if the Europeans didn’t steal all their resources and deny them any self governance for decades, they’d have functional countries.
@@rangarolls6018 the whole map is a mess. They’d be way more countries on the African continent if that really did happen. Instead you have nations with terrible borders with equally terrible problems of ethnic and religious conflict
true south Africa was better during apartheid when the colonisers were in control
Why would you use population and area to see what countries are the worst? It doesn't make any sense. The arguments you use for that are simply not important.
By the way, national wealth per capita is a better metric than national wealth. And, of course, not to mention gross national happiness.
How does land area make a country "good" or "bad"?
I know the three BEST
Sealand, Ulm, and Tannu Tuva
Stop stalking me
long live sealand
I thought eswatini was lesotho for a second
How about Indonesia? I'm about to work there as english teacher
Using the same methodology to find the best countries in the world (i.e. take the _highest_ 50 on each of the same rankings, and finding which countries make all four lists), we end up with four countries: Canada, China, France, and the U.S.