I'm from Kashmir and Most of the facts are fairly right in a broad sense but what you've not mentioned is the HATRED that Muslims have for non Muslims ( Christians, Jews , Hindus mainly ) be it Kashmir, Bangladesh, xinjuang, Europe . The Hindus were systematically slaughtered or driven out , those who stayed had to convert , this is the story anywhere Muslims form a majority The Indian army is only doing what a sovereign govt would of with separatists backed by Pakistan . Hope you understand this sitting in a far corner , don't just go by media and statistics
All the Kashmiris who want to join Pakistan should be allowed to leave Indian territory and go to Pakistan. India will not give away of any of its land. Just like the millions of Hindu Sindhis who were asked to leave Sindh empty handed in 1947 inspite of being in the majority in 4 of Sindh's districts and totally dominating the economy of Sindh and its capital - Karachi. India did not even get a square inch of Sindh. Giving up any more territory is out of question.
Blinding unarmed protesters with pellets is the situation there. If you want a jingoistic anti-Pakistan narrative then maybe better stick to Arnab's vitriol. Shirvan is an Azerbaijani and he really would have no problem criticizing Pakistan if Pakistan was to be blamed for the unrest in Kashmir.
frozendilemma LMAO @ peaceful unarmed protestors. These are people hurling rocks to the heads of the security personnel there. Even I'm against the use of pellet guns. REAL weapons must be used against violent protestors instead. Have you seen the photos of the Burhan Wani and the rest of the militant pigs holding AK 47s there? Where do you think they got those guns from? Who do you think trained them to fight against soldiers? Naah, it can't be peace loving Pakistan, right?
ofcourse not...cant be Pakistan. so wat if they sold nuclear secrets to North Korea, so wat if they gave shelter to Osama Bin Laden, Mullah Omar, Mullah Mansour and dozens of other global terrorists. so wat if they used American funding to create Taliban? So what if they butchered 3 million Bangladeshis and raped thousands of their women in 1971? Pak wud never give ammunition and training to terrorists in Kashmir.
Muslims from outside India invaded and captured Kashmir. Hindus were killed,, forced to convert etc over hundreds of years. Now,, after both sheikh Abdullah and Maharaja Ranjit Singh opted to join India,, where is the question of azadi fir Muslims in Kashmir? Those who consider themselves not native to India,, can leave n go wherever they like. Those who consider themselves Indian,, can live happily like millions of Muslims in other parts of India. What's special about kashmiri Muslims as compared to others in rest of India. ? There's no question of giving even an inch of Kashmir. In fact, India should settle other Indians in Kashmir, like China is doing in Tibet,, to make Kashmir like rest of the county. That's what has been lacking all these years.
Difference is they can greet with salams and eat Halal and worship in the same Mosques and slaughter cows. I dont see any Indian temples in those countries. Your comment was about Pakistanis moving to non Muslim countries but indians have to move to Muslim countries. lol
In reply to "Fair Human"'s comment; why would you assume that all or most Indians moving to Muslim nations; are not themselves Muslims, and thus have no need for a Hindu Temple. India is home to the World's 3rd largest Muslim Population!
A proud Indian till my last breath! If china questions our sovereignty, me and the people of Arunachal Pradesh will act as the first line of defence!! Jai Hind! From Tawang , Arunachal Pradesh
I'm not even indian. Anyways if people complain about the treatment of muslims in india they should also look at how hindus are treated in Pakistan. And while muslims apparently aren't fleeing from india there are almost no hindus left in Pakistan. Which says a lot.
***** I don't know about them beeing the fastest growing. But since partition the percentage of Hindus in Pakistan has certainly been decreasing a lot more than muslims in India. Anyways i feel like there should have been a bit of focus on the situation in pakistani controlled kashmir.
113Robinho Actually, it's been increasing. The fertility rate in Pakistan for Hindus was 3.1, far higher than the Muslim average in Pakistan, and even the hindu average in India. www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/hindus/ The only decrease occur during the partition, but the same thing could be applied to Muslims in India. As for focus on Azad Kashmir, go right ahead. Azad Kashmir is fairly autonomous, and not heavily militarized.
You did a good research on thhis issue...Although I am a Nationalist Indian & I didn''t find this video offensive or biased... But India need to use force now.....We have seen 60 yrs without much force from our Army, but things never changed...We have to use force now to take things under control, this might be the best solution.
Asserting control will never bring peace to a region it will be a matter of time until the local revolts. There are infinite amounnt of examples in history that you can look at. And Under control? No mate Violence at its peak from Kashmirs side religious extremism at rise and from India's side I dont need to mention the human rights violation. How long will India use brute force to keep things under control? The kids that are growing up seeing their father being taken away for a conspirisy you think that kid in his early adulthood 20 years from now wont start another revolt? Military in Kashmir is an excuse for saperatist to gain recruits I hope you know that.
Right thats the short term solution whats your long term solution? You are not saying Indian military will be stationed there forever are you? The moment the army leaves they will remind themselves of the wounds the Army caused them over the decades. Remember the military isnt saint either they are committing atrocities as well and these events will stay in public mind for a while they will just hold themselves until the Army leaves. A long term solution is to make the Kashmir people feel less of a Pakistani and more of an Indian but that wont happen because of the sour relation India created with Kashmir so just think about it before taking an action
@10:40 "Islamabad has certainly played a crucial role in promoting insurgency, in the 1990s, in truth however - the current crisis is indigenous to India". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks 2008.
Of note here though, is that when the Pakistan Foreign Minister - who should have been headed to New Delhi 'to support Peace' (or, more likely smile at the fact that Pakistanis had committed one of the greatest act of World Terrorism on an Indian city), She instead derailed the entire by; meeting with Kashmiri separatists firsts. If I were a cynical man, that would like like a "Congratulations"... thelinkpaper.ca/?p=18161
"For the United States, economist William T. Dickens found that full-employment unemployment rate varied a lot over time but equaled about 5.5 percent of the civilian labor force during the 2000s. Recently, economists have emphasized the idea that full employment represents a "range" of possible unemployment rates. For example, in 1999, in the United States, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gives an estimate of the "full-employment unemployment rate" of 4 to 6.4%. This is the estimated unemployment rate at full employment, plus & minus the standard error of the estimate." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_employment?wprov=sfla1
In Europe is quite common to see unemployement rate even up to the 20%. In southern italy among the younger workers the unemployement rate in 2013-2014 was mor than 40% A 5% is an incredibly good performance. I can't believe anyone blaming any governament for such a number
Please do through research before you attempt such sensitive topic. Apart from few thousand people no one is causing trouble. There are no problem Kashmiri Muslims to seek work in any part of country.
The poor "unarmed protestors" often mistaken hand grenades for potato while throwing them at the armed security forces. This is what happens when you cross border just to buy weekly groceries.
Anand P Durai sure plz do so these ugly idiots can see mirror and what the fuck your raw agents do here if u isn't involved in anything here why the fuck your most senior raw agent cought kalbhoshan yadev vomiting the truth and real face on ugly india online didn't you watch his interview??
The fact that India is not using the most popular tool in empire buildng..."Propaganda" on the subjects , itself implies that your accusations of supposed "empire-building" attempts is just a figment of your demented imagination. If we had used propaganda and such kinds of dirty tricks, to spread our influence, you bet your ass even Pakistan, Tibet , Bangladesh Myanmar all the way upto Thailand would've been a part of greater India by now. You should be grateful that we are not driven by barbaric instincts like your British masters.
Do your homework @CaspianReport before making sensitive videos like these.There's no mention of the Kargil War here & moreover you show that human rights were violated by the Indian Army..You don't know a single thing about India..I think you should stop making videos and pack up your channel if you are not able to show the truth.
@theman123pwn, you need not be a student of history to know whose fault it is. If you can do some more research instead of just watching this video and finding faults ,you'll come to know the real truth.
Ah god damn fucken Indian. Once you had divided Pakistan into two, now fueling the Baluchistan for separation. Listen you imbecile many of your states want separation and some are fighting war with your Army for decades. What if China decides to separate those nations from India? Ever think of that?
Nemo sunk my Nautilus China is incapable of the and it is true that India is doing that in war torn Pakistan when they have a crumbling economy hut support Hizbul. The protestor were waving ISIS flags for fuck sakes. I'm not saying India is complete right either as they need to stop the militarization and fight terrorist covertly and minimize issues with the public by public demilitarization and give the Kashmiri people more voice as well as stop trying to control economics of the region unlike they do in other parts of the area. I'm not authoritarian, I'm libertarian but this Pakistani support is undeniable as there were no issues until Pakistan redirected the Mujahideen from Afghanistan to India after 89
TheRealDesi Jantha The invasion was done by the British. nearly half of it is occupied by Pakistan. That being said do you want a video only on the Pakistani part? or all of Baluchistan that is being oppressed right now? will India help the Iranian occupied part? or at least the Afghan?
You should clearly mention that India never wanted a division, but religious state of pakistan was created due to assertion by Muslim League i.e. Jinnah. India is a Secular state.
Kashmir problem is not as big as you think.... If government allow force to take any action in Kashmir then Kashmir problem will be ended in few week's only....
I still maintain that the root cause of Kashmir conflict is the gradual change in its demography during the Afghan rule. 1 - For example the root cause of Homophobic laws in Uganda is arrival of Christianity. If they were still pagans, chances are they wouldn't have cared about anyone's orientation. There would be no LRA. 2 - Root cause of subjugation of women in Afghanistan is the extinction of Buddhism from there and arrival of Islam. 3 - Root cause of why native American or Australian languages are undergoing extinction is the arrival of White Europeans. 4 - Root cause of Kashmir problem is the arrival of Afghan rule which led to Islamization of the valley. 5 - If the Indian army vacates, Jihadist groups will sieze power and turn the valley into another Syria. 6 - Job creation in Kashmir necessitates regular flow of tourists - for this stability is needed as the Kashmir valley is only an area of dimensions 100 km and 150 km. It has limited resources but a large population. 7 - Kashmir is also prone to floods and earthquakes - setting up an industry is neither easy nor safe. 8 - The biodiversity in Kashmir is depleting, the glaciers are melting, the archaeological sites are being neglected - India has to retain control.
Google Bamiyan Buddhas. Also Google Gandhar. Afghani regions was once ruled by the great Kushana Kingdom. In fact the 4th Buddhist council was held in Kashmir. In thé last 500 years Native American population has decreased from 100% to less than 2%, Native Australian population has decreased from 100% to less than 1%. Similarly Kashmiri non-Muslim population has decreased from 100% to around 3%. The biggest mass exodus after independence of India was the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus by Islamists. Government had no choice but to crackdown on the Islamists.
Hari Singh joined India after Pakistan-backed lashkars invaded J&K in 1947 in violation of a Standstill agreement between J&K and Pakistan, to force J&K to join Pakistan. This has been very neatly ignored. Lahore Declaration is mentioned but Kargil backstab is ignored. Kashmiri Pandits did not flee because of 'escalating violence'- they were brutally killed and their women were raped. Operation Gibraltar, Operation Grand Slam nothing finds a mention. A simple comparison between PoK and Indian Kashmir could have been there to make it more subjective but alas no media is allowed in PoK, Gilgit or Balochistan to know what's happening there. More people are 'missing' in Balochistan than people 'detained' in Kashmir and mind you the Balochi population is much lesser than the Kashmiri population.
88th viewer. Keep up the fantastic work Shirvan! Your videos are very informative and greatly appreciated. By the way, if you have the time can you do more videos regarding geopolitics in the Horn of Africa. Cheers!
I am Pakistani and I LOVE my Indian brothers. Yes, I feel for Kashmiri human rights, but lets not let that create conflict between us. MAY ALLAH BLESS INDIA!!!
Good video. This will certainly help people outside the sub-continent to better understand the issue. Just a small correction- Balochistan is pronounced Balu chi- stan. The chi as in chicken.
US and EU labeled them as terrorists and u stated it like it wasn't true (saying later that locals think of them as a heroes), but then just 1 min later u show them waving ISIS flag... wtf=?
Kashmir should just be an independent state, complete with all its territories from India, Pakistan and China, imo. A shame it won't happen any time soon but, well, hopefully some day, for the sake of the people of Kashmir.
India is not a hindu country as this video claimed. India is a secular democratic republic. India has had muslim and sikh presidents. the previous prime minister of india was a sikh, who held office for 10 years.
@@hinaahmed382 do some research brother. India have legal claim over kashmir. Also, you think if india walks out , you will be happy and free forever? Pakistan will occupy it within a week and read about pakistani military' response when you ask for "freedom" or maybe just simply ask the bengalis.
+CaspianReport your report about Kashmir is biased. Unfortunately you have gave in to religious,ethnic affiliations. As part of Social media and journalism you are suppose to be neutral and secular. Audio- Visual media affects people's mind more drastically then any other. Your video report has following severe flaws/biases. (1)You have solely focused on Situations Indian Administered Kashmir and completely ,purposely Omitted mentioning situation in Pakistan occupied Kashmir . (2) Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir and other Princely states were ruled by "Kings/Prince" NOT by "Nobleman". They were sympathetic to colonial rule. (3) In your Video at 3:10 stated that New Delhi divided kashmir in to 3 regions. A very Wrong statement because new delhi didn't divided state as it simply dont have constitutional rights to do because of Article 370. On otherhand Pakistan divided Its occupied Kashmir or Azad kashmir into different regions of Muzaffrabad ,Gilgit ,baltistan. Also give significant portion of Kashmir Shaksgam valley to China. What kind of nation give away territory of alley ? (4) In Video at 5:05 joint Lahor declaration failure is sole responsibility of state of Pakistan because of kargil war in 1999. Which they themselves started. You failed mentioned (purposely) that. (5) In your Video at 5:25 India took advantage of September 11 attacks , please specify . (6) In your Video at about 5:44 Human rights violations by Indian army you stated , again failed to clearly mention situation in P.O.K. and vicious heinous cycle of violence by Radicals. plight of Non Muslims in valley (purposely). (7) In Video at about 8:52 u/s 144 of criminal procedure act assembly is banned. Please do research again and specify whether it is Cr.P.C. or RANBIR PENAL CODE or INDIAN PENAL CODE. (8) B.J.P. or Indian people's party as you mentioned at 10:07 , seeking to "construct Housing colony for soldiers family " please give CITATIONS. Art 370 of Indian constitution prohibits any citizen from Other Indian states to move in Kashmir. Instead Pakistan HAVE NO SUCH PROVISIONS many Panjabis and pathans not belonging to Kashmir moved into P.O.K. (9) at about 12:40 Iranian concerns are overstated. (10) at about 13:40 Indus river treaty fears unnecessary and Highlighted purposely. (11) At about 14:53 India is CONFEDERATION which is absolutely false statement. INDIA is QUASI-FEDERAL REPUBLIC . According to Indian constitution India is "Union" this unique term coined for QUASI-FEDERALISM inspired from CANADIAN and AUSTRALIAN constitutions. Lastly you need amend your mistakes as they seriously damaging to reputation of responsible Nation which is only democracy in chaotic Asia still strong while others crumbles in middle east.
Modi did not threat Balochista nor are we Interested in pak , we just want pak to stop aiding separatist groups aka stop interfering with internal affairs of India if and when pak stops it's support to separatist groups situation will normalise ....we want peace as much as anyone else
how can India justify declaring war on state of hyderabad and junadagh and then annexing it just because it had a hindu majority, but then deny pakistan's annexation of kashmir, a muslims majority region with a hindu ruler. do indians admit that they are hypocrites?? can some one from india please answer my question as it would very much help to shed light into these allegations of hypocrisy. and also how can indians can talk about the death toll due to pakistan sponsorship of insurgents when indian forces killed an estimate 50 - 80,000 civilians during operation polo, and then hiding the mass killings by the indian forces for over 60 years, and then finally de-classifying those documents in mid 2000??
The kashmir valley you mean there are no problems in jammu or ladakh and as far as southern part of valley is concerned you call it an open prison ? well it is as open as pakistan occupied kashmir or baluchistan for that matter
Our sources may be different ....but I don't believe whatever our media shows and I encourage everyone to do the same ....we haven't handled this issue well but that's our internal matter Pak has nothing to do with it PS - someone in US congress introduced Pak terror state bill , don't think it will be passed this time but it's a good start.
***** No india wont go to the UN or NATO or any other organisation in hope to get back POK cause if it does then kashmir will turn into syria , this has to be resolved bilaterally and by bilaterally i mean india and the ppl of kashmir including hindus and buddhist. As far as POK is concerned yes it is indias land but we are ok with it as long as pak does not interfere with the other part, it is only an issue if there is interference.
+AltamishTahir well bro,the difference between Junagadh-Hyderabad and Kashmir is this,in the first case when the people revolted,the Nizam cracked down on his subjects,so vallabhai patel gave them an ultimatum that they must stop killing people or else we would intervene,thats exactly what happened and the locals were delirious with excitement. Now Kashmir,when Hari Singh was dilly-dallying over the decision,Pakistan decided to invade kashmir and annex it like we did with Hyderabad. The difference here was,the local Kashmiris saw the soldiers and alerted the indian authorities,because of which hari singh had to accede to india to get access to our army and defend kashmir. Now this was either because they had witnessed the pakistani invaders burning villages and targeting minority sect muslims and non muslims ,which goes against their ages of peaceful co-existence. As far as the rest of your post is concerned im sorry to say that the reason you think we are hypocrites is because the pakistani establihment feeds their public lies. Before you say our media is doing something similar,our medias reports are backed by the US,Russia,EU ,UK basically anyone fighting against terrorism in the world.So the next time you see a news report,check out the same report on BBC or CNN and make up your mind then.
thanks for the so called your "Truth". It does not even set well on the timeline of events. for e.g. Kashmir invasion by Pakistan predates to that of acquisition of Hyderabad! You have a nice and subtle way of pushing "political Islam". once you figure out which sect and flavour of Islam you want to soft peddle, your work will be easier
Dear Shirvan, firstly thanks for choosing the topic. Now, I appreciate your study work on the issue. But after all, being a resident of India, I can assure you that you missed many points... The India-Pakistan division was too complex to simplify it in such way. Another pint is you really don't get the 'Jihadism' perspective of the Kashmir Unrest. India has suffered one division based on religion. It can't and will not afford anymore... Pakistan funds militants and supports Jihadi Terrorism. The recent Uri Attack is enough evident. Pakistani Weapons and other proofs are there, which are enough evident. Please have a deeper study of India-Pakistan history to understand this point more clearly.Best Wishes..
I will respect you, as you seen someone who is knowledge and doesn't speak out of their asses as some of the people here do. I think Indians always have played the Pakistan supports terror card, and this needs to stop. It is the Pakistani army engaging in action against these groups. The army is cleaning the messes of the byproducts of other nations foreign policies in the Pak-afghan region. Sadly, our men are paying the price too. The Indians always forget that our army men and our people die fighting, again I repeat fighting these groups. Not mention, has not occurred to you, that your groups are attempting to destabilize Pakistan as well? How you are supporting a few Idiot radicals in bolochistan and attempting to give them "safe" haven. So please, educate yourself better. Open your mind this should go to all Indians. Pakistan and India are both at fault for many things, don't let the generation of our fathers influence The younger generations. We must come together.
I like your Narratives, but your Muslim focused narration not only makes me rethink the info i got from you on other conflicts, it makes me question your intellectual integrity.
Rajkiran Panuganti I agree. There have been Human Rights violations in the valley like any conflict zone, but he seems uninformed of the other side of things. I was in Kashmir in May 2016, and there are mosques with loudspeakers in Ramadan asking for death of infidels in Kupwara, and that is not covered.
completely disagree. Caspian report is one of the least biased reporting channels u have come across. Just because he gives the muslim point of view, we can not cal him biased. Also, for an area with a major Muslim presence, any good report must show the Muslim point of view.
We Kashmiris all hate india as we are not Indians and want their occupation forces out. PaKistan is better than India for us. We have nothing in common with indians as there is no such thing as an Indian. Winston Churchill said India is no more a country than Africa. WE share nothing in common with Tamils, Gujus, Bihairs, Maratis and other Indians. 95% of Indians are nothing like us. Regarding Pakistan probably about 70% of Pakistanis are similar to us and that is why we prefer Pakistan over India.
I used to watch Shivam's report thinking he gave a honest unbiased analysis, but seeing this, i am not so sure anymore. What Shivam said was not factual at all, he says 'ideologically Kashmir should be a part of Pakistan' this is a childish statement. India is a secular country, no region , irrespective of who is in majority, is an integral part of India. Very disappointing analysis by Shavam this time. It looks like he wants to portray the terrorists in Kashmir as 'freedom fighters' when the whole world has designed that group as terrorists. Sadly Shivam is supporting the Terrorist cause by this report. SHAME!
I am from Kashmir and I want to thank you for this vedio...I am just 19 years old but I have already faced human right abuses 2 times I was just 14 yrs old playing in a nearby field just 300 meters away from my home the brave Indian military came and asked us to show identity cards but y would a 14 year boy carry identity card in his own village, we were beaten up so hard that I couldn't walk for two days and I have still 1 scar on my leg.... And then forced us to chant "bharat mataa ki jai"....
@@aerongment9089 in Jammu here I never saw it but I heard this a lot of Times army uses civilans to get there anger out good thing you did nothing Bhai kare kya protest hogi tu na septatist pitge na government dono milke humpe hi gusa utaragy jab jab kashmir me tension badti hai tab tab tak military violence bhi increase hota hai mostly this is the pattern i have seen so far
@@aerongment9089 septatists get money from our neighbours government get's votes and reputation best way to solve this issue is simple hold protest to end AFSPA once it's gone military violence atleast will be some what reduced and if we stop supporting septatists they will eventually stop
Hello Shirwan..... This report is a bit inaccurate, and incomplete. Please listen to Cristine Fair. She has done a lot work in matters concerning Pakistan and its ideological desire for Kashmir, which is what keeps Kashmir on the boil. Also please research more on why the Hindus were uprooted from their homes. There are some missing links.
Shirwan, your analysis and retelling of the story is completely false and propagandist. I have totally lost faith in your objectivity and professionalism. You are telling the story from a Pakistani point of view, literally depending on false information provided by Pakistan. Your commentary was complete propaganda. Jinnah was not motivated by Junagadh or Hyderabad - the conflict over Hyderabad only broke out after after the Kashmir conflict did, and was resolved after the Kashmir ceasefire. Furthermore, the "Muslim nobleman" ruling Hyderabad had already started massacring many Hindus using his Razakar army. The Kashmir issue is driven by the Durand Line (so-called Afghan-Pak "border"). During the period of British rule, they had conquered part of the Pashtun lands through imperial war, and these conquered areas were constantly rebelling against British control. After independence and partition, the new state of Pakistan inherited those Pashtun lands and their ethnic nationalist unrest. When Kashmir decided to go the route of becoming an independent state, Pakistan leader Jinnah was terrified that the Pashtuns would quickly follow suit and pursue independence for themselves, and so he decided to kill 2 birds with one stone by despatching the Pashtun tribal militias to attack Kashmir, on the pretext that "Islam was in danger". It's important to understand that the decision by Kashmir to go the route of being an independent state was undertaken by mutual agreement between "Hindu nobleman" Maharaja Hari Singh and Muslim political leader Sheikh Abdullah. After Pakistan invaded Kashmir using the Pashtun militias (forerunners of today's Taliban), both the "Hindu nobleman" Hari Singh and Sheikh Abdullah signed the Instrument of Accession to India - both of them, not one of them. India has held numerous elections in Kashmir over the decades, without incident or problems. It's only once the US began backing Pakistan closely during the Afghan War against the Soviets, while turning a blind eye as Pakistan nuclearized itself, that Pakistan became bold enough to pursue an intense insurgency strategy against India. Pakistan backed insurgency not only inside Kashmir but also in other parts of India, including the Indian state of Punjab which it destabilized first before doing the same in Kashmir. Once again, to repeat - the root of all of Pakistan's conflicts with neighbors lies in the Durand Line (so-called Afghan-Pak "border") and its unsustainability. Pakistan equally pursues a policy of destabilization and insurgency in Afghanistan, just as it does in India. Both of these insurgency wars in Afghanistan and Indian Kashmir are the legacy of US support to Pakistan during the 1980s for the purpose of bleeding and defeating the Soviet Union.
seriously these are the best videos on RUclips, cinematic quality and more objective than others. if you're not donating you better thumbs up and share
ideologically Pakistan should be a part of ISIS. Shirvan...I am an old subscriber but this report was based on opinions not facts. "Ideologically muslim majority area is part of pakistan " this logic died in 1971 when Bangladesh got independence from pakistan( Not to mention Pakistan did Genocide in erstwhile East pakistan which is now bangladesh). True India has Hindu Majority but is a Secular country.So your opinion " Ideologically Kashmir should be part of pakistan" stands null and void. Paksitan is the first Islamic State(ISIS) in this world. Pakistan is notorious for killing their citizens.(like Punjabistan did in bangladesh ,now killing in Balochistan,Gilgit-baltistan)
Correct. Kashmir seems an ideological issue. created by the support of ideological Muslims to remind the world that muslims cannot live with others. They are not like another human, they are 'superior'. Kashmir unrest doesn't have well beings of Kashmiris in the heart. It is a war to show the 'proof of concept'. A proof of concept which, as you pointed out, lost its ground with the independence of Bangladesh, With Shia-Sunni conflict etc., etc. Kashmir, like Syria and Iraq, like Afghanistan, like Pakistan and like similar such places in the world, is just a playing field for Oil rich, ideologically extremist, orthodox Wahabis to say the humanity F**k you -- we won't let you live.
The only difference between ISIS and Pakistan, if you see history from the eye of geopolitics, is that when Pakistan was created, US of A supported it. (and they supported it just because of the fear that India with its socialist inclined political class will be an another communist country).
@ shirvan one more fact worth mentioning is that , after the partition(between India & pakistan) , the first decision taken by pakistan was to attack the princely state of Jammu & kashmir and 33% territory was captured by pakistan before a ceasfire was announced. During the course of the war, the princely state of kashmir acceded with India, thus becoming a formal part of india Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947
Very informative video and a good assessment of both parties. Well done. Please also do a report on how UN and US are basically ignoring this crisis for decades. Also, the comment war down here is poisonous. Don't go down too deep :)
majority of Kashmir want independence and they don't want to be a part of India but India is not giving them the right of self determination and as a result of it Kashmiris have no other choice but picking up guns and start a war against the Indian occupation that's why Kashmiris like freedom fighters and they support the freedom movement
Regardless of who is right or wrong, for whatever reasons, Kashmir has more strategic value than the inhabitants for the Indians. The entire Himalayas chain, most of it uninhabitable, is the birthplace and headwaters of the great rivers of Asia. The Mekong, Yellow, Ganges, Brahmaputra and the 5 rivers that water Pakistani Punjab. The Indians will hold onto Kashmir as will the Chinese to Tibet, not for altruistic or nationalistic reasons but strategic ones. On the same note, would the US give up the entire Southern and large portions of the Rockies that it stole from Mexico? The Colorado River is a trickle by the time it exits to the sea in Tijuana. Not likely. This is not about nationalism and religion, it is survival. You can't drink your iPhone when you are parched or your fields need water and the Indians will fight for every inch for the Kashmiri soil.
This is a relatively balanced report on the Kashmir issue, unlike what a lot of Indians are claiming here. But Kashmir has long been a thorn in this region's geopolitics. The only sensible solution to the Kashmir issue is an internationally monitored plebiscite that gives Kashmiris a right to choose their own destiny (independence, Pakistan or India). But neither side wants this as India suspects that it'll open up doors for secessionists in the North-east and they might end up losing the Kashmir Valley and Pakistan thinks that it won't get the whole of Kashmir (Jammu and Ladakh) if such a plebiscite occurs. But this is the only solution. Because of Kashmir, both countries have been at each other's throats and have wasted copious amount of resources on fighting each other. And given the other social problems that plague both of these countries, they cannot afford to continue this for much longer. I really hope a compromise could be reached on this issue and Pakistan and India can resolve their differences like France and Germany did.
Those Kashmiris who ask for Aazadi (Independence), take a moment or two to introspect, or at least go through a history lecture. To look at the situation, look back in the history a thousand years, not some 70-80 years. Just because the barbaric Islamic population can desecrate the Vedic Temples, and make the Hindus flee, does not mean that they represent Kashmir. Rather understand, that a piece of land is a mirror of it's cultural heritage, a legacy of its ancestors. Hence, as integral a part of the secular India, Kashmir is now, it will be such forever. India will not panic and fall prey to radical Islam. We the people of India will fight it fearlessly.
Wow, I want to know about one question here...... If they were all well educated & free thinking youths like you proclaimed instead of people who weren't exploited by others in their Geo politics than to gain their rights - is the 'Armed Conflict and Violence' was the only option available ?! In our world everyone of us is mixed up in someone else Geo politics either willingly or in ignorance :!
***** Yes I am a Baluch. When I look at the Kurds I remember my people. Kurdistan is split into 4 countries that are oppressing them. And They are trying to reunify their lands and gain independence. So in this regard they are very similar to us. Before ISIS and the growing Kurdish control in Iraq and Syria I used to think that the co-operation between them and us is a realistic possibility as we both need independence from Iran to create our nations. But know that most of the world is supporting the Kurds it is becoming less likely they would make use of our help. I did know the Kurds existed before the war in Syria and Iraq. But only became interested in them as a people after it. And I started researching about their history and culture, and I learned a lot (like Saladin was actually a Kurd :D). Their culture differ from ours but I really like it, however I notice that our musics are a little bet similar. So overall I have a lot of respect for them. And I know the Kurds speak a northwestern Iranian language like us. I heard some spoken Kurdish once and almost couldn't understand anything. But another time I heard I could catch some words whens I was focusing and understand what they were talking about in general. But still not enough to communicate. I guess I heard different Kurdish dialects/languages the first and second time. *Now regarding the Medes*. I know the Kurds consider themselves the descendants of the medes. But I notice most of them treating this like a fact. I don't see it as a fact or a myth but simply a possibility. That is because the only reason they say this is because their language is descendant from the Median language. But language isn't always a good way to determine ancestry. For example 80 million Egyptians speak Arabic but that doesn't mean they are all Arabs, A lot of them are Arabised and we know the history behind it. However sometimes we don't know the history. but that doesn't mean we should jump into conclusions and treat them as facts. For example I am a Baluch and we speak a northwestern Iranian language but we are the only northwestern speakers who live in the southeast of Iran. There was no historical documentation of how the language got there or when. But there is multiple theories that try to explain that and I do consider the best of them as possible concrete explanation but not as facts. Also I'd like to quote Garnik Asatrian: "the relationship between Kurdish and Median are not closer than the affinities between the latter and other North Western dialects-Baluchi, Talishi, South Caspian, Zaza, Gurani, etc."
Dude you missed the massacre of Hindus in Kashmir by Muslims. And you are talking about Human Rights of people who don't recognize any such rights. If Muslims want another state they can bloody fucking go somewhere else.
Unsubscribed just now. This video is sub par. You are being biased, maybe because you are muslim im not sure. For the majority of video you place all the blame on india, and basically you are saying the poor muslims are being oppressed therefore violence. Ill sumorize this video for you: We muslims dinfff do noffnn
Abdul Basit So you want other people to follow your footsteps ? Incest is purely Islamic tradition. Don't impose it on others. Your evil desires will boomerang against yourself.
Mr. You are biased toward USA which played most important role in Kashmir insurgency in 1990s. USA actually under doctrine of Contenment of communism created a buffer line between USSR controlled central Asia and India in form of Taliban which gave birth to many insurgent groups in kashmir post 1988s. You are also biased on front of Indian control of Kashmir and only critising the Indian government for the problem like Pakistan have not been a problem in kashmir conflict. You are also ignoring the role of China in kashmir which has been intensified in recent years.
1:42 Instead of saying “ as circumstances escalated “.....you should specify that Pakistan deployed militants to create unrest so as to force Hari Singh to join Pakistan, but instead he asked for India’s help in exchange for Indian control to some extent in his region
+Todd Bollinger.......I respect that u acknowledge you don't know about Kashmir....But better late than sorry... Learn now...youth are getting blinded more than 85 Kashmiris have been killed by Indians... Only if Kashmir had oil, world would have taken notice of Indian brutality in Kashmir....
I'm from India and I gotta say this is pretty unbiased and realistic. Although I don't understand why the Kashmiris believe unemployment would be less if they join Pakistan or become a new state ( which would orbit Pakistan culturally and economically anyway ) . I mean it's obvious that unemployment would be worse if kashmir joins pakistan......or perhaps not , not with Chinese investment. Hmmm perhaps but it would still open it to the fundamentalist groups from Afghanistan and North Pakistan too. And China's suppression of Uighur muslims won't sit well with then either . Not when they themselves are fighting against what they sometimes rightfully percieve as Indian suppression of themselves. Yeah kashmir is in an loss -loss situation.
Nice work with research but you really ignored Hindu genocide of pandits, what about baluchistan? How can you say it's under control? Just because their freedom movement is curb and snubbed by brute force it's under control? Please do some more research as you said kashmir is legally belongs to India and it will be shortly in near future. Why you missed many terror attacks on Indian armed forces when thousands of Indian soldiers die?
Borders should be drawn based on public vote, not decisions from people on the top rung of society. Denmark and Germany did it. So should the rest of the world. It might clear up many religious and ethnic tensions, where groups have been arbitrarily separated or forced together.
So if you have a Muslim majority neighborhood in Aarhus or Copenhagen they could secede and form their own Islamic Republic by popular vote and just appropriate all property in the area? Maybe I can just secede and declare my properties a separate state, so I can do what I want and avoid property tax?
P HWE You dont understand how the vote went if you think a single individual should just become their own nation because they are cheapskates. Places where clear ethnic groups and religious tensions are, new nations should probably be made, and how those borders should go, should be based on the vote of the people there. "Do you want to be part of nation X or Y?" That way, borders might look silly, but the largest amount of people will be getting exactly what they want, clearing out a lot of tension. Its not just "If city B or individual N wants to succeed".
***** You do know that many radical hindu sects have been lynching muslims for eating cow right? Religious tensions are far from over within India. If there is clear tension, that has resulted in almost martial law, with daily riots and protests, do you really think the way to solve it is to do nothing?
jalioswilinghart I think it's strange to acknowledge a group's right for independence (given how many ways one can define a group i.e. religious, lingual, ethnic etc.) without giving the individual the same right. Of course it is ideal to have states in which one has a common law, and liberal constitution that grants civil liberties, like in the case of Switzerland a multi-lingual, yet relatively successful country with very little tensions between groups. I have been playing with the idea of redrawing the post-colonial into ethnic or religious "nations" much like what was done in Europe in the post-imperial times. I just don't see how this can be voted on, given other factors such as economic investments, infrastructiure etc. I think it's very hard in practice, hence why it isn't done.
P HWE Denmark and Germany did it. Germany had in the past conquered part of Denmark, thus a lot of Danish speaking Germans lived in the now north of Germany. Later a vote decided how the border should go, based on the vote of the people living there. Those who wished to remain part of Germany, did so. Those who wished to become part of Denmark again, became part of it again. I think its a much better solution than all out war, giving approval for sometimes radical separatist movements, leading to all out civil war.
The U.S and Russia are not neighbors with irrational religious differences. However, your right, it is still scary. The U.S is the only country to use them.
those people in kashmir raise flags of ISIS and they had killed many soldiers and still they are the victim of human right abuse? nice covering CaspianReport
@10:40 "Islamabad has certainly played a crucial role in promoting insurgency, in the 1990s, in truth however - the current crisis is indigenous to India". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagai-I 1998.
By the way, Modi's popularity not only stems from his Hindu base, but also from his goal to *make India a developed and industrialized economy.* Mostly the later. Thanks :)
100 times better explanation than most of the indian media. But you forgot one most important thing that maharaja hari singh didnt fully merge kashmir with india but only on some fronts. That is why there is article 370 35A and that is why there are resolutions in the United Nations for a referendum which is to be held which would decide the fate of kashmir finally and guess what only residents of former COUNTRY of jammu and kashmir have the right to vote.
Yeah, but, certainly speak to a few of the people affect before jumping in. This should have been academically stoic - with a journalistic integrity that would overcome the bias. This Production shows one of three things; 1). He did not do enough research into the historical background (prior to 1990), or foolishly ignored it. 2). He then places an incorrect (based in improper research) or negligent (knowingly false) conjecture onto the issue. 3). It culminates into an either truncated/hurried (which does the material/issue much more disservice to begin with as it does not properly add truth, or fails to accurately report a few key points) or biased (and "inadvertently" heavily in favor of Pakistan) report that does serious damage to the integrity of his other pieces. Admittedly every researcher has biases. Sure. However if he can be as biased (and as incorrect) on this - how and where has he been wrong on others before? What is the root of his bias here? How much of a value does his bias play on him? Does the proximity to his home, affect his own bias? Based on the hasty way in which he approached this topic (becuase even the cursory Google searches will lead anyone to pertienet documentation that reinforces well documented and long standing issues regarding Pakistan, the Pakistani involvement to terrorism, or Pakistani involvement in Kashmir - post 1990), is it only becuase he had biased sources (which makes him a poor researcher), or just becuase he actually has a bias? Can we trust his reporting on Azerbaijan? As he is one of the most prominent Azerbaijani voices on RUclips, is he misrepresenting them via bias? Before he tackles another topic, he needs to bounce the ideas off of key researchers/audiances first. The report presents massive logical and some informational fallacies. For his future progression, and the integrity of his brand - I hope there is no repeat of this magnitude.
Heck if kashmir had went to Pakistan maybe they would has a conflict with China over aksai chin , followed by Pakistani support of Uighur seperatists souring thier relationship . Hmmm
dude don't compare Kashmir with other states ..it is geopolitically located,thats why a disputed area .others areas except few in north eastern region don't aspire to separate from Indian union.... . I like your reports but just requesting you to correct some if your statistics..
Few corrections: 1. The partition was not on religious lines for India. Only Pakistan was formed as Islamic state, while India is a secular country. This is evident by the fact that Muslims constitute 96% of PAkistan while every 5th person in India belongs to a minority such as Islam, Sikhism, Buddhism etc.
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm from Kashmir and Most of the facts are fairly right in a broad sense but what you've not mentioned is the HATRED that Muslims have for non Muslims ( Christians, Jews , Hindus mainly ) be it Kashmir, Bangladesh, xinjuang, Europe . The Hindus were systematically slaughtered or driven out , those who stayed had to convert , this is the story anywhere Muslims form a majority
The Indian army is only doing what a sovereign govt would of with separatists backed by Pakistan . Hope you understand this sitting in a far corner , don't just go by media and statistics
and the kashmiris are doing what any dignified people would do to achieve freedom
Harsha Jade and a fool indian pretending to be kashmiri says shit again
i am kashmiri indian and proud of that
@@umerjavednisar also being killed by Indian army and getting what a dignified terrorist get
All the Kashmiris who want to join Pakistan should be allowed to leave Indian territory and go to Pakistan. India will not give away of any of its land.
Just like the millions of Hindu Sindhis who were asked to leave Sindh empty handed in 1947 inspite of being in the majority in 4 of Sindh's districts and totally dominating the economy of Sindh and its capital - Karachi. India did not even get a square inch of Sindh. Giving up any more territory is out of question.
Blinding unarmed protesters with pellets is the situation there. If you want a jingoistic anti-Pakistan narrative then maybe better stick to Arnab's vitriol. Shirvan is an Azerbaijani and he really would have no problem criticizing Pakistan if Pakistan was to be blamed for the unrest in Kashmir.
frozendilemma LMAO @ peaceful unarmed protestors. These are people hurling rocks to the heads of the security personnel there. Even I'm against the use of pellet guns. REAL weapons must be used against violent protestors instead.
Have you seen the photos of the Burhan Wani and the rest of the militant pigs holding AK 47s there? Where do you think they got those guns from? Who do you think trained them to fight against soldiers? Naah, it can't be peace loving Pakistan, right?
ofcourse not...cant be Pakistan. so wat if they sold nuclear secrets to North Korea, so wat if they gave shelter to Osama Bin Laden, Mullah Omar, Mullah Mansour and dozens of other global terrorists. so wat if they used American funding to create Taliban? So what if they butchered 3 million Bangladeshis and raped thousands of their women in 1971? Pak wud never give ammunition and training to terrorists in Kashmir.
Donny G,
Sure it is - just because Pakistan doesn't recognize it, doesn't make it otherwise
then Delhi should also be given to Pakistan as all Muslims left and nothing was given to Pakistan
Muslims from outside India invaded and captured Kashmir. Hindus were killed,, forced to convert etc over hundreds of years. Now,, after both sheikh Abdullah and Maharaja Ranjit Singh opted to join India,, where is the question of azadi fir Muslims in Kashmir? Those who consider themselves not native to India,, can leave n go wherever they like. Those who consider themselves Indian,, can live happily like millions of Muslims in other parts of India. What's special about kashmiri Muslims as compared to others in rest of India. ? There's no question of giving even an inch of Kashmir. In fact, India should settle other Indians in Kashmir, like China is doing in Tibet,, to make Kashmir like rest of the county. That's what has been lacking all these years.
Pakistanis built a Muslim nation, yet still they move to non-muslim countries?
Are you saying if you're born somewhere you aren't allowed to move?
Fair Human
Like many Pakistanis as well? i have been to arab countries especially gulf states Indians arent treated different from pakistanis.
Difference is they can greet with salams and eat Halal and worship in the same Mosques and slaughter cows. I dont see any Indian temples in those countries. Your comment was about Pakistanis moving to non Muslim countries but indians have to move to Muslim countries. lol
In reply to "Fair Human"'s comment; why would you assume that all or most Indians moving to Muslim nations; are not themselves Muslims, and thus have no need for a Hindu Temple. India is home to the World's 3rd largest Muslim Population!
The point was the hindus bulit a hindu country but they still move to Muslim countries
I am a Muslim Pakistani and I love my Indian brothers! WE ARE NOT ENEMIES!
A proud Indian till my last breath! If china questions our sovereignty, me and the people of Arunachal Pradesh will act as the first line of defence!! Jai Hind!
From Tawang , Arunachal Pradesh
@@syedali9198remember 1971
@@vals4207 Dude i said that 4 years ago. I am sorry for that.
Hhhh
@@joydevsarkar4474 Ah yes the only indian victory
@@arhumzia6360 Thier are 4, pakistan lost all
Video would have been better if you had talked about the situation of hindus in Pakistani controlled Kashmir as well (if there are any left. )
I'm not even indian. Anyways if people complain about the treatment of muslims in india they should also look at how hindus are treated in Pakistan. And while muslims apparently aren't fleeing from india there are almost no hindus left in Pakistan. Which says a lot.
Hindus in Pakistan number in the millions, and are the fastest growing demographic in Pakistan. Try again.
*****
I don't know about them beeing the fastest growing. But since partition the percentage of Hindus in Pakistan has certainly been decreasing a lot more than muslims in India.
Anyways i feel like there should have been a bit of focus on the situation in pakistani controlled kashmir.
113Robinho Actually, it's been increasing. The fertility rate in Pakistan for Hindus was 3.1, far higher than the Muslim average in Pakistan, and even the hindu average in India.
www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/hindus/
The only decrease occur during the partition, but the same thing could be applied to Muslims in India.
As for focus on Azad Kashmir, go right ahead. Azad Kashmir is fairly autonomous, and not heavily militarized.
*****
Thanks for the source. I'll look into it.
I don't know why u just ignore to see ISIS flags by Kashmiris in your own video .....
You did a good research on thhis issue...Although I am a Nationalist Indian & I didn''t find this video offensive or biased...
But India need to use force now.....We have seen 60 yrs without much force from our Army, but things never changed...We have to use force now to take things under control, this might be the best solution.
KASHMIR BELONGS TO INDIA AND NO ONE ELSE!
Asserting control will never bring peace to a region it will be a matter of time until the local revolts. There are infinite amounnt of examples in history that you can look at. And Under control? No mate Violence at its peak from Kashmirs side religious extremism at rise and from India's side I dont need to mention the human rights violation. How long will India use brute force to keep things under control? The kids that are growing up seeing their father being taken away for a conspirisy you think that kid in his early adulthood 20 years from now wont start another revolt? Military in Kashmir is an excuse for saperatist to gain recruits I hope you know that.
Humans can not be forced .
The insurgency will increase .
We already shut Khalistan Movement down through force,..same will happen to Kashmir Movement too. I am very optimistic about that.
Right thats the short term solution whats your long term solution? You are not saying Indian military will be stationed there forever are you? The moment the army leaves they will remind themselves of the wounds the Army caused them over the decades. Remember the military isnt saint either they are committing atrocities as well and these events will stay in public mind for a while they will just hold themselves until the Army leaves. A long term solution is to make the Kashmir people feel less of a Pakistani and more of an Indian but that wont happen because of the sour relation India created with Kashmir so just think about it before taking an action
@10:40 "Islamabad has certainly played a crucial role in promoting insurgency, in the 1990s, in truth however - the current crisis is indigenous to India".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks
2008.
Of note here though, is that when the Pakistan Foreign Minister - who should have been headed to New Delhi 'to support Peace' (or, more likely smile at the fact that Pakistanis had committed one of the greatest act of World Terrorism on an Indian city), She instead derailed the entire by; meeting with Kashmiri separatists firsts. If I were a cynical man, that would like like a "Congratulations"...
thelinkpaper.ca/?p=18161
unemployement at 5% is a problem?
C'moooon
5% is a lowest rate , even US has 5% rate they r not chanting anti US slogans , they hate Hindus & secularism , wants Sharia !
exactly prashant
"For the United States, economist William T. Dickens found that full-employment unemployment rate varied a lot over time but equaled about 5.5 percent of the civilian labor force during the 2000s. Recently, economists have emphasized the idea that full employment represents a "range" of possible unemployment rates. For example, in 1999, in the United States, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gives an estimate of the "full-employment unemployment rate" of 4 to 6.4%. This is the estimated unemployment rate at full employment, plus & minus the standard error of the estimate."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_employment?wprov=sfla1
In Europe is quite common to see unemployement rate even up to the 20%.
In southern italy among the younger workers the unemployement rate in 2013-2014 was mor than 40%
A 5% is an incredibly good performance.
I can't believe anyone blaming any governament for such a number
***** they can blame they are Muslims
Sadly missed out lot of actual facts and relied more on opinions
Please do through research before you attempt such sensitive topic. Apart from few thousand people no one is causing trouble. There are no problem Kashmiri Muslims to seek work in any part of country.
Freedom But you already are free
Abdul Basit
Abe chutiye kya bol rha hai?
Angrezi nhi aati to Hindi me bol
stop your fucking lies.
Wow,this shows your ignorance,do you even know the population of kashmir valley and have you ever talked to them..
@@AbdulRehman-qg3rt
Jammu Kashmir is not limited to moron jihadists
The poor "unarmed protestors" often mistaken hand grenades for potato while throwing them at the armed security forces. This is what happens when you cross border just to buy weekly groceries.
Caspian Report Kindly make a video on the human rights violations in Balochistan and Sindhudesh
You Indians always play this card don't you? how about a video about the rape of your women on a daily, and the Hindu supported killing of Muslims.
Oh really...??? What about your honour killing in our country...
5 honour killing on a daily basis..
Anand P Durai sure plz do so these ugly idiots can see mirror and what the fuck your raw agents do here if u isn't involved in anything here why the fuck your most senior raw agent cought kalbhoshan yadev vomiting the truth and real face on ugly india online didn't you watch his interview??
10:20 Wow, Such Peaceful Freedom Fighters !!! Waving ISIS Flags..
The name Kashmir has originated from Hindu saint Hrishi 'Kashyap'
India is making an amateur mistake in empire-building. Force alone is not enough and the cost is prohibitory.
And if that is what India was doing, your advice would be succinct. This, though, is crucially different.
Your knowledge is only based on this video it appears ,please read history of south Asia.
Down with isis
The fact that India is not using the most popular tool in empire buildng..."Propaganda" on the subjects , itself implies that your accusations of supposed "empire-building" attempts is just a figment of your demented imagination.
If we had used propaganda and such kinds of dirty tricks, to spread our influence, you bet your ass even Pakistan, Tibet , Bangladesh Myanmar all the way upto Thailand would've been a part of greater India by now.
You should be grateful that we are not driven by barbaric instincts like your British masters.
Who supply AK47 and granades to those militants are the real question here.
Do your homework @CaspianReport before making sensitive videos like these.There's no mention of the Kargil War here & moreover you show that human rights were violated by the Indian Army..You don't know a single thing about India..I think you should stop making videos and pack up your channel if you are not able to show the truth.
Swallow the truth, both sides are at fault. Your country like Pakistan is no saint of a nation. Stop pretending it is.
@theman123pwn, you need not be a student of history to know whose fault it is. If you can do some more research instead of just watching this video and finding faults ,you'll come to know the real truth.
The expression "real truth" always gives away that your definition of truth "my opinion".
shanker jojar yes,u are beyond 1000% gright.,he has not fully truth shown,dipper studies require, thanks but no thanks for mr.vedio maker.
Talk about Balouchistan invasion by Pakistan
Ah god damn fucken Indian. Once you had divided Pakistan into two, now fueling the Baluchistan for separation. Listen you imbecile many of your states want separation and some are fighting war with your Army for decades. What if China decides to separate those nations from India? Ever think of that?
Nemo sunk my Nautilus China is incapable of the and it is true that India is doing that in war torn Pakistan when they have a crumbling economy hut support Hizbul. The protestor were waving ISIS flags for fuck sakes. I'm not saying India is complete right either as they need to stop the militarization and fight terrorist covertly and minimize issues with the public by public demilitarization and give the Kashmiri people more voice as well as stop trying to control economics of the region unlike they do in other parts of the area. I'm not authoritarian, I'm libertarian but this Pakistani support is undeniable as there were no issues until Pakistan redirected the Mujahideen from Afghanistan to India after 89
Baluchistan is not in Pakistan
yo yo it is most of it
TheRealDesi Jantha
The invasion was done by the British. nearly half of it is occupied by Pakistan. That being said do you want a video only on the Pakistani part? or all of Baluchistan that is being oppressed right now?
will India help the Iranian occupied part?
or at least the Afghan?
Well there's your problem ...religion.
+الحاجب المنصور Oppression and conversion of non Muslim to islam*
+Permafrost
*bullshit
pride and ego*
You should clearly mention that India never wanted a division, but religious state of pakistan was created due to assertion by Muslim League i.e. Jinnah. India is a Secular state.
Nope, ghandi and Ali Jinnah both wanted a partition.
Luckily they divided, otherwise all those Muslims would have ruined India. Even now they are a problem.
India isn't a secular state. Officially it may be, but de facto, it's a Hindu state.
+Sayeed Mohammed Please explain why you think it's not secular.
Sayeed Mohammed By that same logic Turkey is not a secular country. What matters is the law, not some people acting against it.
Kashmir problem is not as big as you think.... If government allow force to take any action in Kashmir then Kashmir problem will be ended in few week's only....
I still maintain that the root cause of Kashmir conflict is the gradual change in its demography during the Afghan rule.
1 - For example the root cause of Homophobic laws in Uganda is arrival of Christianity. If they were still pagans, chances are they wouldn't have cared about anyone's orientation. There would be no LRA.
2 - Root cause of subjugation of women in Afghanistan is the extinction of Buddhism from there and arrival of Islam.
3 - Root cause of why native American or Australian languages are undergoing extinction is the arrival of White Europeans.
4 - Root cause of Kashmir problem is the arrival of Afghan rule which led to Islamization of the valley.
5 - If the Indian army vacates, Jihadist groups will sieze power and turn the valley into another Syria.
6 - Job creation in Kashmir necessitates regular flow of tourists - for this stability is needed as the Kashmir valley is only an area of dimensions 100 km and 150 km. It has limited resources but a large population.
7 - Kashmir is also prone to floods and earthquakes - setting up an industry is neither easy nor safe.
8 - The biodiversity in Kashmir is depleting, the glaciers are melting, the archaeological sites are being neglected - India has to retain control.
I am not sure how Buddhist Afghanistan was. I always thought they had their own religion, Zunism.
Google Bamiyan Buddhas. Also Google Gandhar. Afghani regions was once ruled by the great Kushana Kingdom.
In fact the 4th Buddhist council was held in Kashmir.
In thé last 500 years Native American population has decreased from 100% to less than 2%, Native Australian population has decreased from 100% to less than 1%. Similarly Kashmiri non-Muslim population has decreased from 100% to around 3%.
The biggest mass exodus after independence of India was the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Hindus by Islamists.
Government had no choice but to crackdown on the Islamists.
Rohit Jha I am assuming you are Indian?
+1HUSEINKAPETAN1
question his facts if you disagree not the nationality...
Rohit is a common Indian Name.
Baluchistan is not pronounced like that
It's pronounced Ba-Lokh-e-staan
isnt it Balochistan?
Why the fuck u butthurt
Tupac Shakur hey youre not dead !
00Billy better belive it living in cuba
Hari Singh joined India after Pakistan-backed lashkars invaded J&K in 1947 in violation of a Standstill agreement between J&K and Pakistan, to force J&K to join Pakistan. This has been very neatly ignored. Lahore Declaration is mentioned but Kargil backstab is ignored. Kashmiri Pandits did not flee because of 'escalating violence'- they were brutally killed and their women were raped. Operation Gibraltar, Operation Grand Slam nothing finds a mention. A simple comparison between PoK and Indian Kashmir could have been there to make it more subjective but alas no media is allowed in PoK, Gilgit or Balochistan to know what's happening there. More people are 'missing' in Balochistan than people 'detained' in Kashmir and mind you the Balochi population is much lesser than the Kashmiri population.
Correction: India was not divided between Muslims & Hindus but between Muslims & non-Muslims.
88th viewer. Keep up the fantastic work Shirvan! Your videos are very informative and greatly appreciated.
By the way, if you have the time can you do more videos regarding geopolitics in the Horn of Africa.
Cheers!
I am Pakistani and I LOVE my Indian brothers.
Yes, I feel for Kashmiri human rights, but lets not let that create conflict between us.
MAY ALLAH BLESS INDIA!!!
Good video. This will certainly help people outside the sub-continent to better understand the issue. Just a small correction- Balochistan is pronounced Balu chi- stan. The chi as in chicken.
thank you
Probably you are not aware of the full context. Those outside the sub continent will only end up getting biased information.
Maybe i am not aware fully, having lived in India for only 25 years.
Prasanth Valsan No I am a pakistani and i have many baloch friends, the way to pronounce chi in balochistan is like the che in chess
Ovais Saand Oh. Thank you for this. :)
US and EU labeled them as terrorists and u stated it like it wasn't true (saying later that locals think of them as a heroes), but then just 1 min later u show them waving ISIS flag... wtf=?
Kashmir should just be an independent state, complete with all its territories from India, Pakistan and China, imo. A shame it won't happen any time soon but, well, hopefully some day, for the sake of the people of Kashmir.
That can be said for every ethnic group that wants to be independent, sadly empires aren't going to let that happen.
Even if it were, it would still be prone to meddling from all three regional powers and the situation would likely not be different.
Ruthieal
What about Baluchistan?
Did you ever read the condition of the referendum? If not go and read it first then blabber.
Lol , you should ask the Buddhists in Ladakh , the Hindus in Jammu and the Pandits of the valley if they want to be independent .
India is not a hindu country as this video claimed. India is a secular democratic republic. India has had muslim and sikh presidents. the previous prime minister of india was a sikh, who held office for 10 years.
The entire Jammu Kashmir rightfully belongs to INDIA
Brother Kashmir belongs to neither India nor Pakistan. It has its own identity and should be free.
@@hinaahmed382 do some research brother. India have legal claim over kashmir. Also, you think if india walks out , you will be happy and free forever? Pakistan will occupy it within a week and read about pakistani military' response when you ask for "freedom" or maybe just simply ask the bengalis.
Go eat your(cow's) shit
Soham Shinde why should Muslim areas belong in India? They have no rights
@@alvirarahman2690 because its indias land not muslims
+CaspianReport your report about Kashmir is biased. Unfortunately you have gave in to religious,ethnic affiliations. As part of Social media and journalism you are suppose to be neutral and secular. Audio- Visual media affects people's mind more drastically then any other. Your video report has following severe flaws/biases.
(1)You have solely focused on Situations Indian Administered Kashmir and completely ,purposely Omitted mentioning situation in Pakistan occupied Kashmir .
(2) Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir and other Princely states were ruled by "Kings/Prince" NOT by "Nobleman". They were sympathetic to colonial rule.
(3) In your Video at 3:10 stated that New Delhi divided kashmir in to 3 regions. A very Wrong statement because new delhi didn't divided state as it simply dont have constitutional rights to do because of Article 370.
On otherhand Pakistan divided Its occupied Kashmir or Azad kashmir into different regions of Muzaffrabad ,Gilgit ,baltistan.
Also give significant portion of Kashmir Shaksgam valley to China. What kind of nation give away territory of alley ?
(4) In Video at 5:05 joint Lahor declaration failure is sole responsibility of state of Pakistan because of kargil war in 1999. Which they themselves started. You failed mentioned (purposely) that.
(5) In your Video at 5:25 India took advantage of September 11 attacks , please specify .
(6) In your Video at about 5:44 Human rights violations by Indian army you stated , again failed to clearly mention situation in P.O.K. and vicious heinous cycle of violence by Radicals. plight of Non Muslims in valley (purposely).
(7) In Video at about 8:52 u/s 144 of criminal procedure act assembly is banned. Please do research again and specify whether it is Cr.P.C. or RANBIR PENAL CODE or INDIAN PENAL CODE.
(8) B.J.P. or Indian people's party as you mentioned at 10:07 , seeking to "construct Housing colony for soldiers family " please give CITATIONS. Art 370 of Indian constitution prohibits any citizen from Other Indian states to move in Kashmir.
Instead Pakistan HAVE NO SUCH PROVISIONS many Panjabis and pathans not belonging to Kashmir moved into P.O.K.
(9) at about 12:40 Iranian concerns are overstated.
(10) at about 13:40 Indus river treaty fears unnecessary and Highlighted purposely.
(11) At about 14:53 India is CONFEDERATION which is absolutely false statement.
INDIA is QUASI-FEDERAL REPUBLIC .
According to Indian constitution India is "Union" this unique term coined for QUASI-FEDERALISM inspired from CANADIAN and AUSTRALIAN constitutions.
Lastly you need amend your mistakes as they seriously damaging to reputation of responsible Nation which is only democracy in chaotic Asia still strong while others crumbles in middle east.
Modi did not threat Balochista nor are we Interested in pak , we just want pak to stop aiding separatist groups aka stop interfering with internal affairs of India if and when pak stops it's support to separatist groups situation will normalise ....we want peace as much as anyone else
how can India justify declaring war on state of hyderabad and junadagh and then annexing it just because it had a hindu majority, but then deny pakistan's annexation of kashmir, a muslims majority region with a hindu ruler. do indians admit that they are hypocrites?? can some one from india please answer my question as it would very much help to shed light into these allegations of hypocrisy.
and also how can indians can talk about the death toll due to pakistan sponsorship of insurgents when indian forces killed an estimate 50 - 80,000 civilians during operation polo, and then hiding the mass killings by the indian forces for over 60 years, and then finally de-classifying those documents in mid 2000??
The kashmir valley you mean there are no problems in jammu or ladakh and as far as southern part of valley is concerned you call it an open prison ? well it is as open as pakistan occupied kashmir or baluchistan for that matter
Our sources may be different ....but I don't believe whatever our media shows and I encourage everyone to do the same ....we haven't handled this issue well but that's our internal matter Pak has nothing to do with it
PS - someone in US congress introduced Pak terror state bill , don't think it will be passed this time but it's a good start.
*****
No india wont go to the UN or NATO or any other organisation in hope to get back POK cause if it does then kashmir will turn into syria , this has to be resolved bilaterally and by bilaterally i mean india and the ppl of kashmir including hindus and buddhist. As far as POK is concerned yes it is indias land but we are ok with it as long as pak does not interfere with the other part, it is only an issue if there is interference.
+AltamishTahir well bro,the difference between Junagadh-Hyderabad and Kashmir is this,in the first case when the people revolted,the Nizam cracked down on his subjects,so vallabhai patel gave them an ultimatum that they must stop killing people or else we would intervene,thats exactly what happened and the locals were delirious with excitement. Now Kashmir,when Hari Singh was dilly-dallying over the decision,Pakistan decided to invade kashmir and annex it like we did with Hyderabad. The difference here was,the local Kashmiris saw the soldiers and alerted the indian authorities,because of which hari singh had to accede to india to get access to our army and defend kashmir.
Now this was either because they had witnessed the pakistani invaders burning villages and targeting minority sect muslims and non muslims ,which goes against their ages of peaceful co-existence.
As far as the rest of your post is concerned im sorry to say that the reason you think we are hypocrites is because the pakistani establihment feeds their public lies. Before you say our media is doing something similar,our medias reports are backed by the US,Russia,EU ,UK basically anyone fighting against terrorism in the world.So the next time you see a news report,check out the same report on BBC or CNN and make up your mind then.
thanks for the so called your "Truth". It does not even set well on the timeline of events. for e.g. Kashmir invasion by Pakistan predates to that of acquisition of Hyderabad! You have a nice and subtle way of pushing "political Islam". once you figure out which sect and flavour of Islam you want to soft peddle, your work will be easier
Dear Shirvan, firstly thanks for choosing the topic. Now, I appreciate your study work on the issue. But after all, being a resident of India, I can assure you that you missed many points... The India-Pakistan division was too complex to simplify it in such way. Another pint is you really don't get the 'Jihadism' perspective of the Kashmir Unrest. India has suffered one division based on religion. It can't and will not afford anymore... Pakistan funds militants and supports Jihadi Terrorism. The recent Uri Attack is enough evident. Pakistani Weapons and other proofs are there, which are enough evident. Please have a deeper study of India-Pakistan history to understand this point more clearly.Best Wishes..
I will respect you, as you seen someone who is knowledge and doesn't speak out of their asses as some of the people here do. I think Indians always have played the Pakistan supports terror card, and this needs to stop. It is the Pakistani army engaging in action against these groups. The army is cleaning the messes of the byproducts of other nations foreign policies in the Pak-afghan region. Sadly, our men are paying the price too. The Indians always forget that our army men and our people die fighting, again I repeat fighting these groups. Not mention, has not occurred to you, that your groups are attempting to destabilize Pakistan as well? How you are supporting a few Idiot radicals in bolochistan and attempting to give them "safe" haven. So please, educate yourself better. Open your mind this should go to all Indians. Pakistan and India are both at fault for many things, don't let the generation of our fathers influence The younger generations. We must come together.
Makarand Desai ,yes dear well said I agree with your comments.
You missed important points like United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, adopted on April 21, 1948, and Indian violation of International Law..
do you know it is pakistan which should vacate the land of kashmir first.
U forgot Shimla agreement
I like your Narratives, but your Muslim focused narration not only makes me rethink the info i got from you on other conflicts, it makes me question your intellectual integrity.
Rajkiran Panuganti
I agree. There have been Human Rights violations in the valley like any conflict zone, but he seems uninformed of the other side of things. I was in Kashmir in May 2016, and there are mosques with loudspeakers in Ramadan asking for death of infidels in Kupwara, and that is not covered.
completely disagree. Caspian report is one of the least biased reporting channels u have come across. Just because he gives the muslim point of view, we can not cal him biased. Also, for an area with a major Muslim presence, any good report must show the Muslim point of view.
I agree that he should have taken the perspective of the Rastafari citizens of Kashmir.
then I expect we wont read any more comments from ya? un subbed?
run along little one.
he does it for the shekels man. whatever people pay him to make he'll do it
people of Kashmir who are choosing to go with Pakistan are like US CITIZEN giving up their citizenship for the Mexican one :p just saying
Makes one think, why would they do that
We Kashmiris all hate india as we are not Indians and want their occupation forces out. PaKistan is better than India for us. We have nothing in common with indians as there is no such thing as an Indian. Winston Churchill said India is no more a country than Africa. WE share nothing in common with Tamils, Gujus, Bihairs, Maratis and other Indians. 95% of Indians are nothing like us. Regarding Pakistan probably about 70% of Pakistanis are similar to us and that is why we prefer Pakistan over India.
KOKE Pakistan=Canada* :)
YouGotMyEngineRolling yeah both countries are a neighbour of superpower ! 😛😂
Umer Javed umm because they are dickhead and they've fault in their religion ?
Some Indians in the comments are pissed for some reason
cuz they all are a bunch cry babies.
cuz they all are a bunch cry babies.
We have every right to be.
I used to watch Shivam's report thinking he gave a honest unbiased analysis, but seeing this, i am not so sure anymore.
What Shivam said was not factual at all, he says 'ideologically Kashmir should be a part of Pakistan' this is a childish statement.
India is a secular country, no region , irrespective of who is in majority, is an integral part of India.
Very disappointing analysis by Shavam this time.
It looks like he wants to portray the terrorists in Kashmir as 'freedom fighters' when the whole world has designed that group as terrorists.
Sadly Shivam is supporting the Terrorist cause by this report.
SHAME!
Parikshit Bhujbal I thought he gave both sides of the argument
Short version: muslims gonna muslim.
Just give Kashmir to Pakistan
Am Kashmiri
Juat give Pakistan to India.
Am Indian.
Black Pagan Keep dreaming
I thing you should change title to unrest in Indian Kashmir as you did not talk about Situation in Pakistan held Kashmir.
I am from Kashmir and I want to thank you for this vedio...I am just 19 years old but I have already faced human right abuses 2 times I was just 14 yrs old playing in a nearby field just 300 meters away from my home the brave Indian military came and asked us to show identity cards but y would a 14 year boy carry identity card in his own village, we were beaten up so hard that I couldn't walk for two days and I have still 1 scar on my leg.... And then forced us to chant "bharat mataa ki jai"....
Kuch ulta sulta tu tune nahi kiya na ?
@@indiaandisrael662 kya ulta sulta karta bro...
@@aerongment9089 in Jammu here I never saw it but I heard this a lot of Times army uses civilans to get there anger out good thing you did nothing Bhai kare kya protest hogi tu na septatist pitge na government dono milke humpe hi gusa utaragy jab jab kashmir me tension badti hai tab tab tak military violence bhi increase hota hai mostly this is the pattern i have seen so far
@@indiaandisrael662 u said it right na goverment na separist they are just doing business and politics...
@@aerongment9089 septatists get money from our neighbours government get's votes and reputation best way to solve this issue is simple hold protest to end AFSPA once it's gone military violence atleast will be some what reduced and if we stop supporting septatists they will eventually stop
Hello Shirwan.....
This report is a bit inaccurate, and incomplete.
Please listen to Cristine Fair. She has done a lot work in matters concerning Pakistan and its ideological desire for Kashmir, which is what keeps Kashmir on the boil. Also please research more on why the Hindus were uprooted from their homes. There are some missing links.
Shirwan, your analysis and retelling of the story is completely false and propagandist. I have totally lost faith in your objectivity and professionalism. You are telling the story from a Pakistani point of view, literally depending on false information provided by Pakistan. Your commentary was complete propaganda.
Jinnah was not motivated by Junagadh or Hyderabad - the conflict over Hyderabad only broke out after after the Kashmir conflict did, and was resolved after the Kashmir ceasefire. Furthermore, the "Muslim nobleman" ruling Hyderabad had already started massacring many Hindus using his Razakar army.
The Kashmir issue is driven by the Durand Line (so-called Afghan-Pak "border"). During the period of British rule, they had conquered part of the Pashtun lands through imperial war, and these conquered areas were constantly rebelling against British control. After independence and partition, the new state of Pakistan inherited those Pashtun lands and their ethnic nationalist unrest. When Kashmir decided to go the route of becoming an independent state, Pakistan leader Jinnah was terrified that the Pashtuns would quickly follow suit and pursue independence for themselves, and so he decided to kill 2 birds with one stone by despatching the Pashtun tribal militias to attack Kashmir, on the pretext that "Islam was in danger".
It's important to understand that the decision by Kashmir to go the route of being an independent state was undertaken by mutual agreement between "Hindu nobleman" Maharaja Hari Singh and Muslim political leader Sheikh Abdullah. After Pakistan invaded Kashmir using the Pashtun militias (forerunners of today's Taliban), both the "Hindu nobleman" Hari Singh and Sheikh Abdullah signed the Instrument of Accession to India - both of them, not one of them.
India has held numerous elections in Kashmir over the decades, without incident or problems. It's only once the US began backing Pakistan closely during the Afghan War against the Soviets, while turning a blind eye as Pakistan nuclearized itself, that Pakistan became bold enough to pursue an intense insurgency strategy against India. Pakistan backed insurgency not only inside Kashmir but also in other parts of India, including the Indian state of Punjab which it destabilized first before doing the same in Kashmir.
Once again, to repeat - the root of all of Pakistan's conflicts with neighbors lies in the Durand Line (so-called Afghan-Pak "border") and its unsustainability. Pakistan equally pursues a policy of destabilization and insurgency in Afghanistan, just as it does in India. Both of these insurgency wars in Afghanistan and Indian Kashmir are the legacy of US support to Pakistan during the 1980s for the purpose of bleeding and defeating the Soviet Union.
I'm really interested in answer of Shirwan to this.
He won't answer.
his islamic bias is showing, he better zip it up. ;)
India is simply responding to Pakistan's relentless provocation - as anyone will, when goaded enough. Pakistan suffers from irredentism.
manofsan and a fool who know nothing but watch indian news results?! an absolute idiot brainwashed
seriously these are the best videos on RUclips, cinematic quality and more objective than others. if you're not donating you better thumbs up and share
ideologically Pakistan should be a part of ISIS.
Shirvan...I am an old subscriber but this report was based on opinions not facts.
"Ideologically muslim majority area is part of pakistan " this logic died in 1971 when Bangladesh got independence from pakistan( Not to mention Pakistan did Genocide in erstwhile East pakistan which is now bangladesh).
True India has Hindu Majority but is a Secular country.So your opinion " Ideologically Kashmir should be part of pakistan" stands null and void.
Paksitan is the first Islamic State(ISIS) in this world. Pakistan is notorious for killing their citizens.(like Punjabistan did in bangladesh ,now killing in Balochistan,Gilgit-baltistan)
Correct. Kashmir seems an ideological issue. created by the support of ideological Muslims to remind the world that muslims cannot live with others. They are not like another human, they are 'superior'. Kashmir unrest doesn't have well beings of Kashmiris in the heart. It is a war to show the 'proof of concept'.
A proof of concept which, as you pointed out, lost its ground with the independence of Bangladesh, With Shia-Sunni conflict etc., etc.
Kashmir, like Syria and Iraq, like Afghanistan, like Pakistan and like similar such places in the world, is just a playing field for Oil rich, ideologically extremist, orthodox Wahabis to say the humanity F**k you -- we won't let you live.
Says Pakistan should be part of ISIS, goes on to say this report is based on opinions instead of facts.
The only difference between ISIS and Pakistan, if you see history from the eye of geopolitics, is that when Pakistan was created, US of A supported it. (and they supported it just because of the fear that India with its socialist inclined political class will be an another communist country).
@Maarten : I intensionly satirically said "ideologically pakistan should be part of isis" to prove my point.
Shrikant Dubey
Cause dumb statements will proof anyone's point.
@ shirvan one more fact worth mentioning is that , after the
partition(between India & pakistan) , the first decision taken by
pakistan was to attack the princely state of Jammu & kashmir and 33%
territory was captured by pakistan before a ceasfire was announced.
During the course of the war, the princely state of kashmir acceded with
India, thus becoming a formal part of india
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947
Very informative video and a good assessment of both parties. Well done. Please also do a report on how UN and US are basically ignoring this crisis for decades.
Also, the comment war down here is poisonous. Don't go down too deep :)
The Kashmiri Pandits suffered from a genocide,get your facts right.
majority of Kashmir want independence and they don't want to be a part of India but India is not giving them the right of self determination and as a result of it Kashmiris have no other choice but picking up guns and start a war against the Indian occupation that's why Kashmiris like freedom fighters and they support the freedom movement
Regardless of who is right or wrong, for whatever reasons, Kashmir has more strategic value than the inhabitants for the Indians. The entire Himalayas chain, most of it uninhabitable, is the birthplace and headwaters of the great rivers of Asia. The Mekong, Yellow, Ganges, Brahmaputra and the 5 rivers that water Pakistani Punjab. The Indians will hold onto Kashmir as will the Chinese to Tibet, not for altruistic or nationalistic reasons but strategic ones. On the same note, would the US give up the entire Southern and large portions of the Rockies that it stole from Mexico? The Colorado River is a trickle by the time it exits to the sea in Tijuana. Not likely. This is not about nationalism and religion, it is survival. You can't drink your iPhone when you are parched or your fields need water and the Indians will fight for every inch for the Kashmiri soil.
What freedom? The British left in 1947. Kashmir is already free
Prashant Nair you is an idiot and i can't even go further cause an idiot can't even understand that
Kashmir has been part of India for 5000 yrs
Islamist extremists can move if they want
And we won't even if we have to vanish entire kashmiri ethnicity now cry more
This is a relatively balanced report on the Kashmir issue, unlike what a lot of Indians are claiming here.
But Kashmir has long been a thorn in this region's geopolitics. The only sensible solution to the Kashmir issue is an internationally monitored plebiscite that gives Kashmiris a right to choose their own destiny (independence, Pakistan or India). But neither side wants this as India suspects that it'll open up doors for secessionists in the North-east and they might end up losing the Kashmir Valley and Pakistan thinks that it won't get the whole of Kashmir (Jammu and Ladakh) if such a plebiscite occurs.
But this is the only solution. Because of Kashmir, both countries have been at each other's throats and have wasted copious amount of resources on fighting each other. And given the other social problems that plague both of these countries, they cannot afford to continue this for much longer. I really hope a compromise could be reached on this issue and Pakistan and India can resolve their differences like France and Germany did.
Those Kashmiris who ask for Aazadi (Independence), take a moment or two to introspect, or at least go through a history lecture. To look at the situation, look back in the history a thousand years, not some 70-80 years. Just because the barbaric Islamic population can desecrate the Vedic Temples, and make the Hindus flee, does not mean that they represent Kashmir. Rather understand, that a piece of land is a mirror of it's cultural heritage, a legacy of its ancestors. Hence, as integral a part of the secular India, Kashmir is now, it will be such forever. India will not panic and fall prey to radical Islam. We the people of India will fight it fearlessly.
Wow, I want to know about one question here......
If they were all well educated & free thinking youths like you proclaimed instead of people who weren't exploited by others in their Geo politics than to gain their rights - is the 'Armed Conflict and Violence' was the only option available ?!
In our world everyone of us is mixed up in someone else Geo politics either willingly or in ignorance :!
OMG he talked about Baluchistan! YES!
Balochistan.
00Billy
both are pronounced the same and refer to the same thing
Ur balochi? what's your views on kurds and median empire?
*****
Yes I am a Baluch. When I look at the Kurds I remember my people. Kurdistan is split into 4 countries that are oppressing them. And They are trying to reunify their lands and gain independence. So in this regard they are very similar to us. Before ISIS and the growing Kurdish control in Iraq and Syria I used to think that the co-operation between them and us is a realistic possibility as we both need independence from Iran to create our nations. But know that most of the world is supporting the Kurds it is becoming less likely they would make use of our help.
I did know the Kurds existed before the war in Syria and Iraq. But only became interested in them as a people after it. And I started researching about their history and culture, and I learned a lot (like Saladin was actually a Kurd :D). Their culture differ from ours but I really like it, however I notice that our musics are a little bet similar.
So overall I have a lot of respect for them.
And I know the Kurds speak a northwestern Iranian language like us. I heard some spoken Kurdish once and almost couldn't understand anything. But another time I heard I could catch some words whens I was focusing and understand what they were talking about in general. But still not enough to communicate. I guess I heard different Kurdish dialects/languages the first and second time.
*Now regarding the Medes*. I know the Kurds consider themselves the descendants of the medes. But I notice most of them treating this like a fact. I don't see it as a fact or a myth but simply a possibility. That is because the only reason they say this is because their language is descendant from the Median language. But language isn't always a good way to determine ancestry. For example 80 million Egyptians speak Arabic but that doesn't mean they are all Arabs, A lot of them are Arabised and we know the history behind it. However sometimes we don't know the history. but that doesn't mean we should jump into conclusions and treat them as facts. For example I am a Baluch and we speak a northwestern Iranian language but we are the only northwestern speakers who live in the southeast of Iran. There was no historical documentation of how the language got there or when. But there is multiple theories that try to explain that and I do consider the best of them as possible concrete explanation but not as facts. Also I'd like to quote Garnik Asatrian: "the relationship between Kurdish and Median are not closer than the affinities between the latter and other North Western dialects-Baluchi, Talishi, South Caspian, Zaza, Gurani, etc."
Ruthieal
What is that?
Could you cite your sources? I want to find some good sources to understand this situation in depth
Dude you missed the massacre of Hindus in Kashmir by Muslims. And you are talking about Human Rights of people who don't recognize any such rights. If Muslims want another state they can bloody fucking go somewhere else.
That is the best unbiased report, I have (ever X 5) seen on any given platform. Respect and Salute from Pakistan..............
Unsubscribed just now. This video is sub par. You are being biased, maybe because you are muslim im not sure. For the majority of video you place all the blame on india, and basically you are saying the poor muslims are being oppressed therefore violence. Ill sumorize this video for you: We muslims dinfff do noffnn
triggered
So because there is a muslim majority uprising they are per definition the ones to blame?
I completely agree with you.
Abdul Basit
So you want other people to follow your footsteps ?
Incest is purely Islamic tradition.
Don't impose it on others.
Your evil desires will boomerang against yourself.
Zgembo121 you indians will never accept your fault so go and unsubscribe but the world knows about india's violation of human rights
Mr. You are biased toward USA which played most important role in Kashmir insurgency in 1990s. USA actually under doctrine of Contenment of communism created a buffer line between USSR controlled central Asia and India in form of Taliban which gave birth to many insurgent groups in kashmir post 1988s.
You are also biased on front of Indian control of Kashmir and only critising the Indian government for the problem like Pakistan have not been a problem in kashmir conflict.
You are also ignoring the role of China in kashmir which has been intensified in recent years.
India and Israel really are a lot alike xD
Soon Europe and America will join them !
I love both!
Only terrorists support Palestine
wipe ur hairy ass with ur stinky turban lol
Good countries are allies to Israel like US , Russia , China and Western Europe .
Only Islamists support Kashmir / Palestine .
Man, this is such an unbiased report on Kashmir. We don't get to see it that often. Kudos.
who told u dis is a indigenous problem and pakistan hs nothing 2 do with it? do ur research more thoroughly...
learned more about Kashmir conflict from this vid than any of the Indian news channels or newspapers. Thanks a lot.
"it's all the Hindu nationalist's fault!"
-Regards, Muslim CaspianReport
1:42 Instead of saying “ as circumstances escalated “.....you should specify that Pakistan deployed militants to create unrest so as to force Hari Singh to join Pakistan, but instead he asked for India’s help in exchange for Indian control to some extent in his region
I'm mightily impressed at all the objective, balanced, level-headed, totally not sectarian bickering in this comment-section
Just kidding.
Do you have any background knowledge about these issues Westerner? No? Then shut your meddling trap.
^^ Like I said.
Todd Bollinger Yeah you think being glib and snarky makes you look smart dont you?
Yes, yes I do.
+Todd Bollinger.......I respect that u acknowledge you don't know about Kashmir....But better late than sorry...
Learn now...youth are getting blinded more than 85 Kashmiris have been killed by Indians...
Only if Kashmir had oil, world would have taken notice of Indian brutality in Kashmir....
I'm from India and I gotta say this is pretty unbiased and realistic. Although I don't understand why the Kashmiris believe unemployment would be less if they join Pakistan or become a new state ( which would orbit Pakistan culturally and economically anyway ) . I mean it's obvious that unemployment would be worse if kashmir joins pakistan......or perhaps not , not with Chinese investment. Hmmm perhaps but it would still open it to the fundamentalist groups from Afghanistan and North Pakistan too. And China's suppression of Uighur muslims won't sit well with then either . Not when they themselves are fighting against what they sometimes rightfully percieve as Indian suppression of themselves. Yeah kashmir is in an loss -loss situation.
Contrary to indian media and indian public belief... indian army are not good at behaving with locals.rape etc. thats a very big factor
At 6.34, says 35%, but text reads 25%
Nice work with research but you really ignored Hindu genocide of pandits, what about baluchistan? How can you say it's under control? Just because their freedom movement is curb and snubbed by brute force it's under control? Please do some more research as you said kashmir is legally belongs to India and it will be shortly in near future. Why you missed many terror attacks on Indian armed forces when thousands of Indian soldiers die?
Borders should be drawn based on public vote, not decisions from people on the top rung of society. Denmark and Germany did it. So should the rest of the world. It might clear up many religious and ethnic tensions, where groups have been arbitrarily separated or forced together.
So if you have a Muslim majority neighborhood in Aarhus or Copenhagen they could secede and form their own Islamic Republic by popular vote and just appropriate all property in the area? Maybe I can just secede and declare my properties a separate state, so I can do what I want and avoid property tax?
P HWE You dont understand how the vote went if you think a single individual should just become their own nation because they are cheapskates. Places where clear ethnic groups and religious tensions are, new nations should probably be made, and how those borders should go, should be based on the vote of the people there. "Do you want to be part of nation X or Y?" That way, borders might look silly, but the largest amount of people will be getting exactly what they want, clearing out a lot of tension. Its not just "If city B or individual N wants to succeed".
***** You do know that many radical hindu sects have been lynching muslims for eating cow right? Religious tensions are far from over within India. If there is clear tension, that has resulted in almost martial law, with daily riots and protests, do you really think the way to solve it is to do nothing?
jalioswilinghart I think it's strange to acknowledge a group's right for independence (given how many ways one can define a group i.e. religious, lingual, ethnic etc.) without giving the individual the same right. Of course it is ideal to have states in which one has a common law, and liberal constitution that grants civil liberties, like in the case of Switzerland a multi-lingual, yet relatively successful country with very little tensions between groups. I have been playing with the idea of redrawing the post-colonial into ethnic or religious "nations" much like what was done in Europe in the post-imperial times. I just don't see how this can be voted on, given other factors such as economic investments, infrastructiure etc. I think it's very hard in practice, hence why it isn't done.
P HWE Denmark and Germany did it. Germany had in the past conquered part of Denmark, thus a lot of Danish speaking Germans lived in the now north of Germany. Later a vote decided how the border should go, based on the vote of the people living there. Those who wished to remain part of Germany, did so. Those who wished to become part of Denmark again, became part of it again. I think its a much better solution than all out war, giving approval for sometimes radical separatist movements, leading to all out civil war.
These 2 countries have nukes. Scary.
USA and Russia have a lot more nukes, and they are fighting a cold war in Syria. Even more scary. But hey, we are used to that, right?
The U.S and Russia are not neighbors with irrational religious differences. However, your right, it is still scary. The U.S is the only country to use them.
video needs more research.
Meanwhile, in the US, Indian and Pakistani immigrants come and open/operate commercial business... together.
Man that is half-truth
those people in kashmir raise flags of ISIS and they had killed many soldiers and still they are the victim of human right abuse? nice covering CaspianReport
An excellent, well researched and unbiased peace of work by you. Bravo
@10:40 "Islamabad has certainly played a crucial role in promoting insurgency, in the 1990s, in truth however - the current crisis is indigenous to India".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagai-I
1998.
By the way, Modi's popularity not only stems from his Hindu base, but also from his goal to *make India a developed and industrialized economy.* Mostly the later.
Thanks :)
Who's funding this channel? AL-Jazeera?
Thankyou and how much did you get paid from the Muricans for this?
Kashmir is India
I would say its pretty nice and unbiased
100 times better explanation than most of the indian media. But you forgot one most important thing that maharaja hari singh didnt fully merge kashmir with india but only on some fronts. That is why there is article 370 35A and that is why there are resolutions in the United Nations for a referendum which is to be held which would decide the fate of kashmir finally and guess what only residents of former COUNTRY of jammu and kashmir have the right to vote.
Hey caspian dude, Ireland would be a goldmine for one of your geopolitical/mindset videos, just saying.
Yeah, but, certainly speak to a few of the people affect before jumping in. This should have been academically stoic - with a journalistic integrity that would overcome the bias. This Production shows one of three things;
1). He did not do enough research into the historical background (prior to 1990), or foolishly ignored it.
2). He then places an incorrect (based in improper research) or negligent (knowingly false) conjecture onto the issue.
3). It culminates into an either truncated/hurried (which does the material/issue much more disservice to begin with as it does not properly add truth, or fails to accurately
report a few key points) or biased (and "inadvertently" heavily in favor of Pakistan) report that does serious damage to the integrity of his other pieces.
Admittedly every researcher has biases. Sure. However if he can be as biased (and as incorrect) on this - how and where has he been wrong on others before? What is the root of his bias here? How much of a value does his bias play on him? Does the proximity to his home, affect his own bias? Based on the hasty way in which he approached this topic (becuase even the cursory Google searches will lead anyone to pertienet documentation that reinforces well documented and long standing issues regarding Pakistan, the Pakistani involvement to terrorism, or Pakistani involvement in Kashmir - post 1990), is it only becuase he had biased sources (which makes him a poor researcher), or just becuase he actually has a bias? Can we trust his reporting on Azerbaijan? As he is one of the most prominent Azerbaijani voices on RUclips, is he misrepresenting them via bias?
Before he tackles another topic, he needs to bounce the ideas off of key researchers/audiances first. The report presents massive logical and some informational fallacies. For his future progression, and the integrity of his brand - I hope there is no repeat of this magnitude.
Enlighten us where and how his report is bias with your sources please.
Today, Ireland is totally irrelevant.
obvious troll is obvious
Superb report.....both Indians and Pakistanis need to watch this report. Completely non-biased and detailed report. Good job man👍
it seems like if india had went about it the right way there would be less much less conflict
Might be yeah. Or atleast ceded the Muslim majority valley to them while keeping jammu and ladakh
Heck if kashmir had went to Pakistan maybe they would has a conflict with China over aksai chin , followed by Pakistani support of Uighur seperatists souring thier relationship . Hmmm
dude..you should do more research on the ethenic cleansing in jammu and kashmir..this video seems biased...
It is. Look at the list of sponsors.
You want Kashmiri freedom yet this will create terrorism think for a second the people who fight are terrorist yet you support them?
dude don't compare Kashmir with other states ..it is geopolitically located,thats why a disputed area .others areas except few in north eastern region don't aspire to separate from Indian union.... . I like your reports but just requesting you to correct some if your statistics..
#uriattack we want absolute revenge
Shut up...Kashmir will be free soon...Indian tyranny will end....
***** Every occupational force says this but history of mankind says something else...
@@beesboy10 I am reading this in 2020 and laughing. You didn't see Amit Shah coming did you?
Few corrections:
1. The partition was not on religious lines for India. Only Pakistan was formed as Islamic state, while India is a secular country.
This is evident by the fact that Muslims constitute 96% of PAkistan while every 5th person in India belongs to a minority such as Islam, Sikhism, Buddhism etc.
Great job Shirvan, you are one of the best RUclipsrs ever.
Caspian report, you should've talked fairly about ethnic cleansing of hindus from the valley.
A very well researched video. Great job
thank you for this video! this situation is happening in my country and i wanted to hear your insights into this. so thanks for making this!