Видео

Don’t really understand why this was so poorly supported by Sony. I shot Sony years ago but it seemed to me that Sony rarely issued firmware updates unlike some other manufacturers.

I b itch about canon a lot but I want to say why I bought it. I sold all my Sony equipment with an A7iii because I wanted “something else” Sony’s consistent shutter failures which has continued to this day told me Sony was a toy camera and I hated the feeling of their cameras in my hands. It was when the A7RIV was released and it said “improved weathersealing” and as a trucker I had a lot of time to think about that statement. It told me Sony dangles the carrot. 🥕 Keeping you slightly away from a quality product with each release. I initially planned to get a Nikon Z6ii but then I realised an R6 was probably my jam… but the R5 was only one weeks pay more. On Black Friday 2020 Canon did amazing deals with these cameras I picked up an R5 and 24-70 RF for less money than the Nikon Z6ii and 24-70 was. I truly believe that we photographers should use whatever brand gives us a buzz but we should all have a canon or Nikon camera because they are the tools for the craftsman. They are dependable. Sony’s shutter issue is like buying a really nice Kia. Sure it can keep up with the big boys like Toyota and Honda but you just know one day that engine will pop.

I cannot recommend anyone buy canon. Whilst I use the R5 happily there is an unhappiness that I’m using lenses which are too heavy or not exactly what I want. Call me fussy but I hate the white hoods on the 70-200. Canon never gave us a professional lightweight 50mm lens in the EF and it was still so successful. How is that possible?

Amarjeet, The people probably have the same issues with these 45- RF lenses as me and you. There is the RF 24 F1.8/ RF 24 Hybrid and it still holds you back because you don't want to struggle between: Gold-ring/Red-ring quality/ focus by wire/ internal-external focus expanding / EF adapters etc. I bought the RF 28 shortly after I got the R7. But I already had two EF 28's. I still pick the EF 28mm F1.8 Goldring above the RF 28mm pancake for APS-C. ''Preferences like those can happen to me with every new RF release.'' Like why do I need 3 of those 28mm Primes??? I do regret selling the EF-m M50 + EF-m 32mm to some degree. At the same time I do not need any new gear, nor want to get rid of the stuff I already own. I have not made my mind up set wether I might snag any of the latest RF-s Sigma 33/56mm primes. Ps: In 2024 I bought 1 RF-s lens + 1 EF lens. Sold 2 of mine EF lenses. That was a steady year -'gear wise'.

You are exactly correct. The first canon camera I bought when I got back from the Viet Nam war . I’m old 76 and have a number of canon cameras and lens that I have sold because I thought I needed them. I still have lenses many

The one, and only reason I am staying with Sony is the great Tamron lenses I can get at great prices.

It’s the price… people would like a F2.8 lens for around 1000 bucks. It’s not the lack of focal length options.

Amar, good video. In my view, the only thing that mirrorless has brought to the table over DSLRs is AF and video. I do not think IQ is any better, if anything it may be worse. Last year I compared images I took with the 6D and 5D4 with images I took with the R6 and R5 and concluded that the IQ from the DSLRs was just as good, if not better, particularly with the 6D. In fact, I believe the IQ from the R5 was inferior. To me, the IQ from the R5 was missing something particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The tonal gradations were just not as pleasing as on the 6D in particular. Whether it’s the RF lenses or the cameras, I am not sure. One thing I am certain of is that the EF 16MM-35MM F4 L smokes the RF 14MM-35MM F4 L, which sucks IMO. I also think the original 24MM-105MM F4 renders better than the RF version. So, I sold the R5 and some film cameras and replaced them with the 6D and 5D classic and repurchased a few EF lenses to go with the 50MM 1.2 and 70MM - 200MM f2.8 which I retained. I also bought a Nikon D700 and D750 to used old Nikkor MF lenses from the film days along with a few Nikkor AF lenses. I am much happier now and taking many more pictures once again. I kept the R6 for situations in which I want the better AF.

Your face looks sharp and pleasing.

I would argue no one really likes adapting glass. I think most non-pros want access to less expensive native mount glass that performs very close to OEM glass. Pros will usually buy the best OEM glass even if 90% of the time no one can tell the difference. The difference is usually there but third party manufacturers have upped their game and can come very close, and even occasionally besting, first party glass at far lower prices. That’s what I would say most serious enthusiasts, and those making a living from photography, would buy who don’t have the budget for the OEM glass and want those options.

Lighting is fantastic.

I still enjoy shooting with Neo-vintage DSLR cameras from Canon and Nikon e.g. Nikon D850 DSLR as it reminds me of film cameras but with far better autofocus. I'm really impressed with the cinematic rendering of Nikon F-mount and Canon EF lenses. They are my first choice for travel and portrait photography.

Canon will be just fine.

I'm enjoying the cheaper EF Market. Just picked up a used 70-200 f2.8 II from Japan for 1k (mint) for my AF needs. I can't MF on a moving person for anything lol. There are cheaper versions out there, but they were a bit beat up.

I greatly simplified my lens kit when I moved from DSLR to Mirrorless (which involved a brand change to Canon). I have 3 RF L lenses (100-500, 100mm macro, 24-105 F4). 1 STM lens (16mm F2.8) and one RF-S lens (10-18). My wife and I share a 18-150 on occasion. I had over a dozen lenses with the other brand DSLR. In reviewing my library, close to 90% of my shots can be covered with just 3 of the lenses. Add in the 16 and the 10-18 and over 99% of my photography needs are covered. If I need something different for a special project, I can rent. Long away around to say I really have little interest in 3rd party lenses. I understand why people might and that's fine but not something that is important for my photo work.

Here's the deal: Can Canon survive 2025 without a third-party full frame? Yes. Beyond that, it becomes questionable. Nikon went down the same path as Canon with ZF system by not allowing third-party support, and Nikon turned it around. Nikon has actually produced more new glass than Sony and Canon. Overall, people don't want to adapt ef lenses to Rf bodies. They want native glass with a new camera. Canon's prices are high, and we can not skate over that fact, but so is new Nikon glass and new Sony glass. The difference is that Nikon is welcoming third-party support, and Sony has always had it. Sony has a huge amount of native third-party glass along with tons of their own used glass in the secondary market. Canon has no secondary market to speak of RF glass. The number 1 status changes from period to period. It was Sony, and now it's Canon. I personally care more about lighting than I do cameras. They have ef, and they also have native Stm glass, but people want the regular RF and a solid secondary used market, if we are being honest. Canon is a great camera company. If you keep telling your market no, they will eventually tell you no. Canon is bending because they are starting with APSC lenses. I love Nikon, but at the time I switched, the smart business decision was Sony. This was before the RF mount and before the Nikon z6ii. I started with Canon for film and with their first digital camera, and the only reason I don't have an R3 in my hands right now is the lens situation. For Sony, I have GM glass, Sigma, Dzofilm, and Tamron. That's what I want for Canon. I have shot the R3, and I would be lying if I said that I didn't love it. But I wouldn't change my business model over to Canon, Canon would be just for me personally. Nikon, Sony, and Fuji want Canon to keep this up, especially Nikon, so they can get some of their sales. Sony as an overall company, not their camera division has more money at its disposal than Fuji, Canon and Nikon combined, and they could easily buy either of these companies. If you aren't hybrid as a business, you are behind and if AI is not a part of your preparation of your business model for the future and plan for it. You will stay behind. You make excellent points here and Nikon and Canon have largely caught up, but being honest neither company has an answer for the A9III and when they do, Sony will hit them again. 😊You are so right about the old Dslr bodies, I have done a shoot with a Nikon D700 and Nikon d3s that no one would ask if it was a 12mp camera.

Amar, thanks for the interesting analysis of Canon's marketing strategy as it relates to market share, focal lengths and lens selection. I shoot Canon for its color palette, ergonomics, technical innovation and lenses. With 45 RF lenses and numerous EF lenses I don't really require 3rd party support as with Sony lenses e.g. Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 VXD G2 E-mount lens.

How is the image quality and character using an R5 with non L-line Canon RF glass vs L glass? And is it better to purchase L-line EF glass with an adapter?

I've had a Nikon ZF since January 2024, so I've been using it for a year now. I absolutely agree with your opinion. Regards from Poland, Jarek

Are there additional parts to this video series? I watched all four and would like to know if the customization and "advanced" items that you mentioned are included in another video?

I always find auto ISO pics a too high ISO. So I shoot everything on manual since I can go from 1/60 to 1/2000 and f1.2 to 11 etc. Sometimes I set the ISO 3200 a whole evening and play with the other settings.

Staying for the R6III !

Sultra , the main thing I don't like aout this body ( I handeled one at Sammy's camera ) , is the mode button should be on the top left side of the top part of body just like the previous 1D series cameras . Where the mode button is on the right side with that dial that's the same as the R3I can't stand it it's not like A 1D series camera get rid of that location . The grippy part that you mentioned that's a very valid point there's nothing there to grab on to .

good lenses? Nikon 135mm f/2 DC, what a lens. I personally love the Sigma 1.4mm ART (first one, if there are new ones out) but that would be a newer lens Edit: if you like wider ones I also have a Sigma 14mm 2.8, by far no perfect lens but super pretty in it's way

The four videos in this playlist provided a great in-depth coverage of the Canon R5 Mark II menus. I have recently purchased this camera, and your videos were a great help to me with what initially appeared to be a very complex menu system. In fact, to help with my learning of the menus (and the location of the various options) that you covered (i.e., on the red, pink, blue, and yellow menu tabs), I went through the playlist 3x resetting my camera each time. I was checking your channel regarding the next video(s) in this series that would cover the light green and orange menu systems, but did not locate any. Any predictions on when the video(s) regarding these (last) two menu items might be released?

I shoot Fujifilm X-T3, X-T4.. Now with the ZF my favorite part is the classic look and the adapter I use for my Sony/ Sigma e mount lens . Had for 6 months now I love it. Sold my X-T4. Best lens on the ZF is the sigma 50m f/2 DN Com lens and the Sony 35mm f/1.4 GM.

Thanks for the review. Since you asked, I use the Artisan & Artist Acam 306 silk camera strap. Doesn't come off the camera, but it's strong, smooth and looks great with the camera.

Among the Nikon AI, AIS lenses that have become legends, i can think of three: the 105mm f2.5, which has won an incredible number of Pulitzer Prizes, the 85mm f1.4, which for some has never been surpassed, and the micro nikkor 55mm f2.8 for its sharpness. We can add the 28mm f2.0 and 35mm f1.4, maybe not legends but which were used every day by press photographers.

I showed this video to my cat 10 times straight. She and I both enjoyed it together. Great work

I have to warn you my friend that acquiring Neo-vintage and vintage Nikkor lenses can become habit forming. Good luck in your quest to find these very special vintage Nikkor lenses. Shooting Nikon is about the lenses and overall photographic experience.

In the uk and in Europe we can barely find a R5m2 or a R1. Still the US is drinking the bulk of the volume it seems. If people are leaving, they are leaving, thinking it over, and coming back 2 minutes later. The reality in the shops do not support your message at all.

Thank you 👍🏻

These days with very high performing cameras it's the least important aspect of the exposure triangle so let the computer decide.

thank you

TLDR;; canon is cooked! or not?🤷‍♂️🤷

Well said Amar. Do I need another camera? No, but the Zf is a nice camera!

Yup, you’re so right. I just don’t know why Nikon won’t put some kind of lightly spring loaded battery door on their cameras. I’ve been wishing they would listen to users as it’s been a request by many people. Couldn’t be easier to do and the cost is absolutely negligible. I don’t understand why they won’t do it. 🥺😞

Absolutely agree! Since owning the ZF I’ve said all along the image quality is very special. I cannot put my finger on it…they just look different, and beautiful…almost how the D700 grabbed my back in the day.

I don't know why but my alfa 300 takes better pictures than xt30ii

Not really Ai-s, but I have heard that 105 and 135 f2 dc are great Nikon lenses that you should give a try.

I purchased the Nikon Z f as a "fun" camera a few months ago. I'm deep in Canon but I wanted to try something completely different. I've absolutely loved this camera as my daily driver. I don't think I could ever change from Canon for my photo work, but the Z f has been an absolute banger of a camera for everything that is not work. I have it paired with the 28mm F2.8 SE, 40mm F2.0 SE, and the TT Artisans 75mm F2.0 AF. Insanely capable setup. I'm excited to see how Canon eventually responds. Can you imagine a Canon P or F1 as a digital camera...holy moly, I can't wait.

Awesome as always Amar. I have yet to get a full frame Nikon mirrorless as I’ve enjoyed my transition from Nikon DSLr (D3, D700) to z50 and Fuji Xpro3. These past few pandemic years has allowed me to concentrate primarily on street and wildlife. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my APSC experience and will hope a pro APSC from Nikon is released but I’ve fallen in total ❤with this camera. We will see what the next few months will bring.

I get it Amar, Nikon camera and adapted Zeiss Batis lens is a magical combination. Thanks so much for the Sony E to Nikon Z Fotodiox adapter info.