Видео

Thank you.

Hey! No, it will not fit. The ef-s lenses have an extra little tab that keeps them from fitting on full frame.

@@iamToddNorris Ah I see, thanks for the quick reply, it's much appreciated!

@@TMxtt you are very welcome!

Hey 👋 betohs2121! It depends on what you're going to do with this lens. I use it mostly for video now without any issues.

Hey Maverick 👋! You could be on to something. Although I've never had this issue with other lenses. At this point I've just moved on to other lenses for photography and I only use this one for video, which it excels at, without issue.

Hey Hector 👋! I mostly use this lens for video now, which uses live view. I haven't used it for photography in a long time. I never could pin down the problem because it's random.

@@iamToddNorris yes, i guess it's mostly random than a consistent problem. Im gonna try to test it only with the live view and see what happens, Thnx!

Hey 👋. This is an EF mount lens so you'd need an adapter to use it on an EOS R camera and while I've never used this lens on an mirrorless camera, I would think it would deliver the same, if not better results because of the newer sensor and improved autofocus capabilities of the EOS R cameras. The only negatives I can think of have to deal with the adapter you'd have to use... It adds weight, size and cost. Canon offers a 100-400mm RF lens that would fit your camera and while it's not as bright as this lens, it's zoom range is longer at 400mm. I think you can pick it up for around $600 usd. If that's out of your budget and you already have an adapter then I'd go with this lens. It's a great lens. Hope that answers your questions.

@@iamToddNorris I really appreciate you so much

Hey Hal 👋. So true!

Thanks Charles! 👍

Exactly! 👍

Hey TÜVRheinland 👋! Thank you.

Hey Azee world 👋! Congratulations on the new lens and thank you!

Hey François 👋! Thank you.

Thank you.

Hey suarairham 👋. I only used the 55-250mm. I would zoom in and get as close as I could to meet the minimum focusing distance and lock focus. No filters, no other lenses, no attachments, no macro tubes, just my 80d and the 55-250mm lens.

@@iamToddNorris seriously? but that was awesome!! 😭😭 lemme know if you have tutorial video about this 🙏😅

@@suarairham I don't have one but I'll try to make one.

@@iamToddNorris okay please sir! 🙌😎

@@suarairham not sure how long it will be cause I'm a couple of videos behind as it is. So let me give you the steps you can try right now. 1. Get 6 feet ( 2 meters) from your subject. 2. Zoom in to 250mm. 3. While looking through the viewfinder, start moving slowly towards your subject. With each step, halfway press the shutter button. You should hear a beep letting you know the camera has locked focus. Eventually you'll get too close and the camera will not beep on the half press. That means you've gone past the minimum focusing distance. Back a little away from your subject until you hear the beep again on half press. 4. Frame your shot and take the picture. I used a single point focusing type and I shot these in Av mode (aperture priority) with the aperture wide open. Also make sure you have good light. This lens needs a lot of light for clean images. Hope this helps. 👍

Thanks Roc. Miss U 2. ❤️

Hey Cosmin Danes 👋! I think these were jpgs. I used little to no processing on these photos. If the photo looked a little washed out, I'd add some contrast using the color curves adjustment to match the other photos in the collection. There's no color adjustments or sharpness or anything else added. I also have a custom color profile in camera I use. It's the standard canon color profile but I back the contrast off 2 clicks. Hope this answers your question.

@@iamToddNorris you're amazing dude!

Thank you.

Hey Kishan 👋! Yes but you'll need the ef to ef-m adapter.

Hey Nicolas👋! Sorry to hear that. There are a couple of things. You could try to close down the aperture to get a deeper depth of field or you could manually focus. The m50 has a setting to turn on called "focus peeking" which will highlight what's in focus when you turn off autofocus and turn the focus ring on the lens. It defaults to a red color but I changed mine to blue because it was easier for me too see. Personally, I've only had focusing issues with this lens in photography. It's always done a pretty good job in video. In your video's are you tracking a moving object like a face or body? Is the camera on a tripod or are both you and the subject moving?

@@iamToddNorris thanks Todd, I normally don't use any zoom but will check the aperture. Everything is on a tripod and I do video of myself about 4m away from the camera and full body so I need to work with AF. I run video in FHD 25fps in neutral picture mode. The sharpness is really bad and blurred especially when I pause the video. I will try to get some help from someone to see how manual focus improve the image. Thanks

@@nauckland OK. Hope you get it sorted out.

@@nauckland Hey Nicolas, just curious, you said the video is really bad when you pause the video... When you scrub the video are any of the frames in focus or are they all out of focus? The reason I ask is because that's what video compression does. When there's movement in a video it takes the frame before it and the current frame and blends them together. This will make a frame look blurry if you pause on it. That's how IPB mp4 compression keeps the file size small. There is an ALL-i compression that doesn't blend frames but it's only on high-end cameras. Another way to get around this is to use a faster frame rate. You can shoot FHD 60 fps if you're in USA or 50 fps if your in UK. You'll still get some blending but it'll be less noticeable when the video is playing. Of course this all depends on if your issue is compression or the lens autofocus. Anyway, hope this helps.

@@iamToddNorris Hi Todd, the all image is out of focus and videos are done in 1080p as the 4K function on the M50 doesn't have AF. I do video myself on a tripod so nobody is being the camera but I tried today taking a video of someone and same results. I tried in 50fps but no improvement. As a need to be about 4m from the camera would a solution be to upgrade to the R50 in order to shoot in 4K with AF? Thanks a lot for your help, really appreciate it

Hey Hazemos 👋. That's a good deal! And yes, the 18-135 will be much better for video! 👍

I use the STM version of this lens on my Canon C100 mk2. Bought used from MPB for £172.00 and I've never regretted buying it. The autofocus and stabilization are great and with the C100 the aperture change whilst zooming is automatically compensated for. Yes you got a good deal.

Hey Ale Salum 👋! Sorry to hear that.

😁

Hey archel 👋! Mine is too on this lens. I wouldn't say it's difficult to turn but stiff, like you said.

@@iamToddNorris I just saw other user there sigma focus is so smooth while mine is not, thank you

Hey Senzor 👋! Thanks man. Most of these images were shot at 250mm at the widest aperture and at the minimal focusing distance. The image stabilization was turned on. All shots were hand held and there was no wind so no movement. My copy of this lens is very sharp. Hope this answers your questions.

@@iamToddNorris thanks man! Indeed helped! dont u sell it? 😅😂 i got one but my copy isn't that sharp. I was thinking to get another, try my luck

@@jOjOwArR 😂😂 IKR! I got mine refurbished from Canon's website at a good price. www.usa.canon.com/shop/p/refurbished-ef-s-55-250mm-f-4-5-6-is-stm

@@iamToddNorris thanks man! Enjoy your day!

Hey YICM! 👋 I've never used the Tamron so I can't recommend or compare but here's a comparison for you to look at: versus.com/en/canon-ef-70-300-f4-5-6-is-ii-usm-vs-tamron-100-400mm-f-4-5-6-3-di-vc-usd

Thank you! I think it will be Canon🤭

Hey Cosmin! 👋 It doesn't have distortion with curved lines but it has the typical wide lens distortion where everything that comes closer to the lens is stretched on the edges. So if you're standing in the center of the frame and put your hand out to touch the lens, your fingers will look 5 feet long. 😂 As you zoom in it becomes less and less. My biggest problem with this lens is it's aperture. It's very dark. In full sunlight it's not an issue but you won't be shooting a moving subject at sunset.

@@iamToddNorris so like u said in the video, is good for landscape :) you find it sharp to the edges or just sharp? Btw mate i really appreciate your devotion. Have you ever thought to coach 1:1 ? 😂😅 i ll be your first student

@@cosmindanes9435 Thanks man, I appreciate you. But my life's so crazy busy right now I'm behind on my videos. Eventually I'll do some coaching / teaching and yes, the 10-18 is sharp and good for landscapes. 👍

@@iamToddNorris and in landscape is the distortion noticed? Btw, thanks a lot again and i wish you all the best! You so nice ;)

@@cosmindanes9435 with any wide angle lens you're going to have to pay attention to the edge of the frame. If something is closer it's going to get stretched. The further away your subject is, the less dramatic the effect. But you'll definitely notice it when your framing your shot. Just be ware and make the appropriate changes to your composition.

Hey Cosmin! 👋 The 55-250 is a better walk around lens but the 700-300 is better for wildlife. The 50mm more reach is awesome. When I'm shooting moving birds from the boat (boats rocking and birds moving) I have to keep my shutter speed super fast, thus I have to shoot with the aperture wide open to get more light. When I stop the aperture down a little the 70-300 gets sharper. On a tripod the 70-300 resolves more detail than the 55-250 because I can zoom in closer. When both lenses are zoomed out they have a foot or more of minimum focusing distance. The 55-250 would do better in a macro situation because it's smaller and easier to handle but nether of these lenses are good for macro. Your ef-s 24mm would be better.

@@iamToddNorris so you mean with the aperture stopped down the 70-300 will be sharper than the 55-250 ? That's interesting.. anyway your photos with the 55-250 shocked me , really blew my mind. Honestly i told you i never seen something like that before (and i ve seen so so many lenses reviews / lenses comparison). So really good job mate. Yeah the 24mm is good enough to me.. i thoght 55-250 will do better for some macro because of the zoom range

@@cosmindanes9435 Thanks Cosmin! For what it's worth, almost every shot in that 55-250 video is at the minimum focusing distance and at the end or close to the end of the zoom range. That's why there's a lot of bokeh in those shots. It was also shot in the afternoon so, good light, close up and zoomed in! 😂

Hey Cosmin Danes 👋! The 18-55 is just a tad sharper if you pixel peep... but the 18-135 gives you more reach and little better stabilization. If I was shooting video I'd get the 18-135. For photography I'd choose another lens... Probably the ef 70-300mm. It really depends on what your shooting.

@@iamToddNorris thanks mate, but how can be 18-55mm sharper than the 18-135mm? I heard the opposite, like you said "a tad sharper" but in favour of the 18-135mm. I mostly do landscape where i got my 55-250mm and for portraits i got my 50mm f1.8.. i was thinking at the 18-135mm more as an walk around lens. (For the moment i got my 24mm pancake to do the job)

@@cosmindanes9435 there can be variances in each copy of the lens due to the precision of optical manufacturing, but generally speaking, it has been my experience that lenses with bigger focal ranges have to make sacrifices some where and usually that's in the optical performance. It's just physics. In most cases prime lenses are sharper than zooms. With that said, the difference between these two lenses in regards to sharpness is minimal, especially on the wide end. The 18-135 gets softer and looses some contrast after the 120mm mark but it's minimal. That's been my experience anyway.

@@iamToddNorris thanks for your time and kindness, mate! I really appreciate. I found it very usefull. May i still ask you one last thing?

@@cosmindanes9435 No problem and absolutely. What's up?

Hey Iko Knyphausen 👋! Thank you and yes, you are correct. Also, the last firmware update sigma released for this lens was about its capability with the eos r (mirrorless) .

Hey Ajaz Ahmed 👋. Nice!!

@@iamToddNorris Thanks

Hey kipling1957 👋. SLR.

Not sure I understand what you're saying. Could you elaborate?

Hey edgard cafe 👋! And thank you. The crop factor is determined by your camera, not the lens. Since the 90d is a crop sensor camera, any lens you put on it will be x 1.6. So the 100-400mm will be a 160-640mm and the 70-300mm will be a 112-480mm equivalent. The 100-400mm L lens is going to be sharper and have a lot better build quality (weather sealing, lens coatings, metal - not plastic etc...) . It's a pro lens with a pro price. The 70-300mm is a pro-sumer lens. It has more plastic and no weather sealing but the optics are very good and it's lighter and easier to handle. Since you're just starting out I would definitely recommend the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM. It will match your 90d perfectly. If later down the road you decide to go with a full frame camera or you win the lottery, that's when I'd look into 100-400mm L. :) Hope this answers your questions.

@@iamToddNorris wow ! You are amazing! Thank you so much ! You clarify my doubts! Have a wonderful day ! 👍happy Easter 🐣

@@edycafe No, YOU are amazing! 😆 Thank you and I hope you have a great Easter!

Hey Mike 👋! It depends on how much room you have and how many people you want to get into the frame. To shoot myself, waist up, I have to place the camera almost 5 feet away from me. If you have the room, you should be fine.

@@iamToddNorris thanks todd. i think im gonna give this lens a try.

@@mikediazong 👍

Hey Capture Your Moments 👋! Yes, it is. Especially outdoors or larger venues.

@@iamToddNorris thanks

Hey Sammy 👋! Congratulations!

Hey Starej Fotr 👋. I promise, the focal length of the ef-s 24mm is the same as a 38.4mm on a full frame camera. You still have to account for the crop factor. It's the same with micro four third's or medium format lenses too. All lenses focal length designation is based off full frame (35mm) measurements. If you want a true 24mm focal length on a Canon apsc, you'll need to use a 15mm lens. It doesn't matter if it's an ef-s or ef lens. If you search for this lens on bhphoto.com and look at the overview tab, it will list the focal length equivalent. 38.4mm. Hope this helps and thanks for the comment.

Hey Charles 👋. This is an EF-S lens. It will not fit your 6d. You need EF lenses.

Hey 665Thunder 👋. Yes it is!

Hey Alejandro 👋! Thank you. Yes, in order to use a lens without any contacts you'll need to go into the menu, I think it's under "custom settings" and look for the item that says "shutter release without a lens attached". This will allow you to use the lens. Hope this helps!

@@iamToddNorris Thank you my friend, I appreciate it!

@@alejandrocarranza3309 you're welcome 👍.

Hey New World 👋. Yes you can but you'll need an EF to RF adapter. I think the Canon one runs around $99. It's called the "Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R".

Thanks Kellmark! 👍

😂

Honey - that weird guy next door is laying on the ground again...

@@johnchastain4351 😂

Hey Shawn 👋! I've noticed my copy is softer at 35mm. But I don't think it's a focusing issue, just my copy I guess. BTW, what camera are you using with the speedbooster? I've been thinking about getting one for my M50.

@@iamToddNorris I use it on my Panasonic G9

@@shawnLisi OK, thanks.

Hey Crayshaun 👋! It's "Frost on Window Pane" by Fey Foxx.

Hey JBM 👋! That's awesome and thank you.

Hey Basileos 👋. Yes. I haven't had any issues with any ef-s lenses on my M50. Just make sure you get the right ef-m adapter for ef-s lenses.

Hey 👋! Yes, you could fill the frame with smaller birds using this lens. I've even used the ef-s 55-250 when shooting smaller birds in my back yard. It's all about how close you can get to your subject without disturbing them. Some birds are more skittish than others. Are you using a crop sensor camera or full frame? On a crop sensor this lens is 105-450mm. It allows you to be a good distance away. At 300mm and 25 feet away from the subject, the frame is 1 foot 10 inches wide and 1 foot 3 inches tall. At 50 feet it's 3' 9" x 2' 6". At 10 feet, it's 6 inches x 9 inches. The Photo Pills app I use has a FOV (field of view) calculator. It comes in handy for birding. It's available for both android and iPhone. Hope this helps.

@@iamToddNorris thank you so much for your Quick answer! I'm using an apsc, crop camera (EOS 250D). Im about to buy the Canon EF 70-300mm is usm ii, thats why i asked😉

@@naronlost1048 👍

I really enjoy listening to your voice, you’re so calm and honest.

@@lucyberger7625 aww, thank you.