Видео

A sponsered audiophile video with a creator under 1000 subs. Ima help you and make it 1/1000 more! (personally I would add some good eq with a little bit more bass to the mic and its perfect, another thing is it is a bit punchy.) (The usb sounds better to me but it does not sound as clear, compared to the direct plug in) | not giving any ideas but would be intresting to do a temu microphone review.

I moved from Nikon FF to micro 4/3rds nine months ago. No regrets at all and now have the full range of lenses including the Olympus big white.

Awesome how can I mount it on non metallic surface like a wall

I don’t know if my son has these. But he is getting them again lol great ideas

There are other factors too, when charging you loose power in terms of heat, how good was the cable you were using to change that also affect the efficiency, these are the factor i know of. Though it was nice to see you calculated usable mAh of the case.

MFT lenses are generally much better than "general public" 24x36 lenses. This is in my opinion the first argument in favor of MFT : superior optics quality Unless you use overpriced Leica lenses, 24x36 lenses are well below MFT (especially the Olympus "pro" lenses with an aperture of ƒ/1.2 which are really superior quality). The so-called "superior quality" of 24x36 is largely over-exaggerated and pushed to the limit by the brands. As a daily user of MF with a very large sensor (Hasselblad H5d-60 with a 4.5x6 sensor), I know what the high quality standards are in photography and especially in terms of optical quality And if I want very high definition and top quality, I will certainly not use 24x36 (very small sensor, heavy, expensive and very disappointing optics, except for Leica, some Zeiss and the Lumix 50mm S PRO ƒ1.4). I use the MF which is certainly heavy, but whose quality is REALLY superlative. It's a completely different world... And otherwise, I use the MFT for the qualities that we know. And especially those of its optics. I do not use 24x36 for the reasons mentioned above. Make no mistake: if you want the best camera in the world right now, it's not a 24x36, but the Hasssleblad X2D and its XCD "V series" lenses which are exceptional. And by far the best in terms of value for money: Lumix G9II or Lumix GX7 + Olympus pro lenses and/or Leica Lumix lenses The 24x36 is certainly the best-selling. That doesn't make it the best. That makes it the best marketed.

Be careful, a Micro Four Thirds lens at ƒ/2.5 is the exact equivalent of a 24x36 lens opening at ƒ/2.5. There is strictly no difference in terms of aperture and therefore brightness The depth of field (and only the depth of field), is EQUIVALENT to a lens closed at ƒ/5 So it is not "ƒ/5 full frame equivalent", but "ƒ/5 depth of field 24x36 equivalent"

have you tried the Surui sq75 with the vhs 10 head?

"As I get older..." It's funny to hear that from someone who's far from being old. Just imagine what you'll be thinking when you're ACTUALLY old. 😉

Fantastic review mate, I believe that the backlash isnt from the head but it's the whole construction of the carbon fiber legs. I've seen some carbon legs gets slightly twisted whenever you pan, upon release, the legs straighten up again causing the backlash effects (hence why it doesnt happen on tilt). But I've only ever seen it happens on photography legs with no mid spreader, I wonder if it's the same issue here.

In reality who prints 30” x 40”? MFT covers 95% of my photography

Shoutout to Teo Crawford. I stumbled over his Channel while researching the GX80 and his Videos are so chill. Love his perspectives!

I think the fact that the PYXSIS is getting so much attention - rightly deserved, actually ensures that third party manufacturers will cash in on its popularity . The range of all kind of accessories and work arounds for cinema cameras generally means that the recent past indicates the future. Plus you’ve already had an option presented to you. Also it would be apparent that people do not think it’s a risk. All you’ve done is made a video in order to get some suggestions really.

The fact that my photographer person already has all of these😭

The real challenge from full frame cameras is that they are not only getting cheaper and cheaper by the year, their bodies and lenses are getting smaller and lighter as well. That will be the final blow to the M4/3 system. when the full frame gear gets really light and compact system wide, the only remaining M4/3 users will be those who need deeper depth of field.

Very useful video and good to see the cases properly too. The friction/resistance inconsistency is a bit of a concern for me, but then again these aren't T or B+W prices... All the best and thank you

Finally a video that shows the details of the legs... This is not for me. Seems too cheap

Awesome video! Thanks for not being a fanboy and providing an honest review.

I thought the same, but the Mofage Poco system makes this a non-issue for me!

Great video and fantastic attention to details! I tried the M8 a few years ago but didn’t really like the feel of it so I sold it, same with the Fuji X100F. Then I got an RD1 late last year and it gives me the film camera feel I was always looking for, but with the convenience of digital. The “film” advance lever is so unique for a digital camera, it makes it so special! Thanks for sharing your thoughts on it!

The more I hear M43=Dead the more I laugh, I see on RUclips and in my circle of shutterbug friends, more and more of them ditching their full frame for M43 , and it's so energizing and inspiring , small size, weight, insane great IBIS, leaving tripods at home, putting together a nice Olympus or Panasonic kit.. I personally have never needed more than 16MP , M43 . Good points.

The very first four thirds format camera, Olympus' E1 slr, was declared dead on arrival in 2003. In 2008 the mirrorless micro 4/3 system was introduced. More predictions of impending doom. This format has been "dying" for over 20 years. It may eventually go away, but until then I'll keep using it alongside a medium format kit. I didn't find increased quality of "full frame" to be worth the weight and size increase. The Olympus E1iii and three lenses weigh almost as much as my primary Fuji GFX lens. I'll keep it.

Agreed with a lot of your points. One thing though, f2.5 in MFT is not f5.0 in FF equivalent. The DoF might be f5.0 FF equivalent but the amount of light hitting the sensor is still f2.5, no crop factor there.

I enjoy mft since 2010.Currently withe thr G9ii.Great hybrid camera, excellent results.So nice to travel with.Pair with the excellent Leica lenses.Wonderful lenses selection all together

Love my OM1. Last night I did a milky way shot using Hand Held High Res for 15 second each for a 12 shot stack of 3 min. I then used Live Composite to light paint the foreground. In post I blended the shots to produce a spectacular result. I use one of the computational modes on 80 percent of my shots. AF has improved tremendously in past few years and is nipping at the heels of the big boys. DXO PureRaw4 eliminates noise issues. Camera Blur in post resolves DOF limitations. I could go on but what a great camera!!!

As a longtime m43 user, with a decade of Nikon DX before that, my opinion is that m43 is not dead. But it's a format that makes the most sense for more advanced and skilled photographers. It is a compromised system from an IQ perspective and it's less forgiving of exposure and cropping mistakes, and has a more narrow shooting envelope than other systems. If you're able to work within its limitations, it can be fun and rewarding to use. But it's not for everyone. I barely recommend it to anyone, in fact! But I have a great lens collection and am mainly an on the go handheld hobbyist user-for my travel, nature, and occasional sports and portrait shooting it suits me just fine!

I recently bought an Rd1s. It's my first rangefinder. I was tossing up between a Leica and the Epson but decided on the Epson as it's such a different design to any other digital camera. I love it.

Nicely done. I've had an R-D1 for a few years, one of my favorite cameras ever

As someone that has used both when they were both released I liked the M8 way more but Im biasd since I used the m6ttl since the late 90s

That M8 is about twice as thick as a stanard M was.

off topic but i was not expecting to be greeted by shaq on the epson website!

Mini HDMI, not USB :) Great video, thank you for sharing

Olympus pro lenses will be the best investment.

for me, i have owned both and i am sticking with the tilta. I like the small rig cause it has a 95 opening for bigger cine lenses, but i just purchased a 5 cine lens set and small rig doesn't sell their screw on filters individually and tilta does for like $7 each, and for a 5 lens set not unscrewing things is a huge time saver. I don't use clip on filters to the front so those mechanics aren't much of an issue to me.

Thanks for this, really enjoyed your opinion!

Would be nice to do a re-review after a year of usage?

i love MFT❤ best system for me!😊

King. 👏🔥

There is no better system for macro, wildlife and travel. Period.

Hernandez Jessica Taylor Joseph Lewis Robert

What's your Ideal body design?

Upgrading from R5. I like the body too, but thanks for sharing your thoughts; interesting.

Congratulations on the video, I like to see young people valuing the advantages of the M43, outside of Japan it is rare to see young people with M43 and it is a very attractive format for older people, I don't know if because they don't want to carry more weight or because they really , so that almost the entire M43 runs very well. In my case, I replaced my Pentax Q with an OM5 and several prime and zoom lenses. I use it while cycling and I carry it in a bag Think Tank Digital Holster 5 hanging on the chest to have it on hand while I ride the bike. The image quality was so good that many times, in the end I left my full frames for the portability of the M43.

I like the body style of it. Because when you in certain situations you ain’t got to worry about someone asking you about permits and saying “oh you guys filming?!” 🤦🏾‍♂️ plus less headache when traveling. Everything can fit in a carry on.

I believe it’s designed primarily for run and gunners, hence why it’s not the shape of the C400, which is production oriented.

I think micro 4/3 system is a good way for the people who travel and like photography. For me the biggest davantage of micro 4/3 is the Wright of camera and lens. As you have told in you video there are some tiny lens with wide aperture and it is very interesting for landscape and street photography. So I am a strong fan of this system. So I hope this system will survive on the future years.👍

I fill my camera backpack like I’m on some military deployment and hauling a 50lbs bag 😂. I’m going to break my back soon 💀.

I have an Olympus EM1 mk2 and it’s still kicking. I have moved on to other cameras but sometimes I like to use it.

I bought my GX80 with 12-32 lens new, for £350. That was a big drop from launch price, and I assume Panasonic had their finger's burnt on compact, rangefinder style cameras. There is certainly a gap in the market judging by the price of a used, 8 year old, 16mp camera. Whether that gap is big enough for fans to pay (1k+?) for a new "budget" equivalent, is another question.

Niche topic 🤔