Видео

@@theknwmad4653 awe, thanks dude!!

@@maksimvoropaev979 thanks man!

@@MidlifeSynthesist daaaayyuuuuum! 🙂‍↔️ 🙏🏼I’m speechless🙏🏼

@@xairvideo thanks man, we’re by downtown. We’ve been seeing it, but fortunately from a distance. Yeah, the factory thing… I thought about that. I have to be careful or it won’t be about the jams anymore because there won’t be any.

🙏🏼

🙂‍↔️. Thank you for watching!

Yo, what’s up dude! If you’re looking for one, I added a notify me button to the shop so you know when the next batch gets released. Thanks for watching!

@@NovakTheEnjoyerty!! Have needed this desperately 🙏

@ I know how you feel

Yo, thanks for watching! I added a notify me button to the shop if you want to get on the list for the next release ✌🏻

Hey! I’m working on another batch, but I’ve added a notify me button to the shop if you want to know when the next batch gets released. Thanks for watching!

Not that I can tell.

🤩

Thanks a lot! I'm still using mine regularly along with my OP1F. Yeah, I'm surprised something like this has been so hard to come by. Not anymore, I guess, lol. Thanks for hangin out!

Thanks so much for watching! I've definitely thought about the XY a lot. @midlifesynthesist and @sonwu have me drooling over them and I absolutely need more sequencing alternatives. If I do, it will definitely challenge my video making skills as I think that one would need the special sauce it deserves. Looking forward to trying one at some point.

@@SONWU it’s a keeper. I need the XY, lol! Yin & Yang 👊🏼

@@NovakTheEnjoyer 😂 ☯

😂

This is the duo I didn’t know I wanted but always needed ☯️

@@fromcodex yes! I think you’ll love it. 😊

@@Giovanni1a I love this! Thanks for contributing!! This process is the part of the op1 that frustrates people the most. The instrument seems to be designed for more of an instinctive approach. Once you go beyond that, it gets pretty difficult to achieve things that you could do so easily on other machines. Because you have to jump through so many hoops with the risk of damaging or losing the original audio, gives it a certain character that no other process could give it. I think that’s where the magic is.

@@NovakTheEnjoyer Great video btw. To cope with the lack of undo, I always setup my "baseline" of a song in one tape (no overdubbing) and after clone this tape to get to work. Once I've made something I really need/like to keep. I lift it from the tape and drop it in my initial (backup) tape. This means that if I make a mistake I can always revert back to the original without the lack of having to startover again.

@ this is something I’ve never done. I’ve transferred stuff from tape to tape, but it never dawned on me to back things up this way. Excellent!

@@mimodelorean the only thing happening outside of the op1f is whatever I recorded into it, but yeah…. Nothing else.

@@shaabaaz3083 damn, thanks man! I appreciate that very much 👊🏼

@@TheDayZEnthusiasts do you mean the song/breakdown in the video? Or the op1 workflow?

I love the microcosm. Between that and the Chroma Console, I don’t really use any other effects except for what is already in the OP1F. I hope they add more.

@@AutismMusician it does not, unfortunately ☹️

@@NovakTheEnjoyer NOOOooooooooooo !!!!!!!!!! What the heck did they do then? lol They Had but 1 JOB !!!!!

Could someone do this for a painting 😄?

Futuristic art distribution.

Cool intersection of mediums! That’s what’s so cool about RUclips..

Whoa! I remember the experience of buying a record or cassette as a kid and spending hours pouring over the lyrics and art. Reading through who wrote and produced what. What a beautiful experience. Maybe we’re onto something here 🧐

Hey dude! The TP-7 and the OP-1 Field are the same price on Reverb, around $1500 each. This makes no sense to me. The TP-7 is a dictaphone, while the OP1F is a full fledged studio. I think the TP-7 is a shiny toy that doesn’t really do much. At least not for me, and not for that price. It beautiful! Just not functional. The TX-6…. If you’re not playing or recording more than one instrument at a time, I don’t understand why you would buy it. It does beat taking a big audio interface around with you if you’re a laptop musician, and it’s a beautiful object, but there are cheaper options out there. If the looper was actually functional, I’d say maybe. Currently, you can only play one loop at a time. I don’t understand why they didn’t make it capable to play a loop per track so that you could actually build out a song on it. I was hopeful for an update, but I don’t think TE is in the business of actively updating the software of its products, so I don’t even think about it. Just a paper weight at this point TBH. Neither of these pieces expand the capabilities of the OP1F in any meaningful way for me 🤷🏻‍♂️.

@@muhammad-rt9fr you can watch the tagged video if you’d like to see some footage I got from this setup. Thanks for commenting! 🙂

I appreciate that, dude! Crazy that you mention that because I often think of RUclips being a living memorial for people. Crazy thought! Thanks for watching!! ⚡️

@@ixamer7 awe dude, that’s awesome! The nice thing is that you don’t have to throw your DAW out. You can always use it if you need it, but disconnecting is such a beautiful thing 👌🏼 Thanks for watching!

@11:15 if you were unsure.

Thanks for the time code, and thanks for watching! I never copy/paste parts for splitting. I always perform the second take. When you copy/paste a part for stereo, it has a terrible phasing quality to it that just doesn't give you a nice stereo effect. In this situation I use a guitar as an example. 1. Record guitar part to one side (Tape Screen - SHIFT + Turn Red Knob before recording to pan Left or Right) and then record the part. 2. Lift (Copy) guitar part to have it in the buffer incase you screw up the second take. 3. Drop the drop that take back down so you have it on the tape. 4. Tape Screen - (SHIFT + Turn Red Knob to pan the opposite side) 5. Record (overdub) same part again to the other side creating a thick and creamy goodness If that second take doesn't go well and messes the whole thing up, you can always just re-drop the first take (because it's sitting in your buffer) and retry the second take. Otherwise, if you scrap everything you'll need to keep recording the first take over again too, and at that point I'm ready to blow my brains out. I hope that clears it up a bit for you! Otherwise you can just use a DAW and save yourself all the hassle and headaches, lol. Thanks again for hanging out!

Yeeaaah!!! ✌🏼

Hey, thanks for watching! When it comes to using the microphone, I never record straight to tape. Instead, I use the vocoder which gives you an effect that is separate from the master effects. In the vocoder settings, when you turn the mix (red) knob all the way up until you see the red dot, you'll hear the full dry signal of the microphone. As long as you're not pressing any keys you won't hear the vocoder. It's a nice little cheat code for getting an extra layer of effects just for the mic.

I'm glad you mentioned this. At the time of recording this I don't believe that update happened yet, but I find myself using SHIFT + DROP now to lift the volume of a good take if it's too quiet in the mix. Otherwise, it always makes me nervous to use this just to consolidate tracks with no undo. One way the OP1F has changed my recording style is that it has simplified my writing. The fear of screwing everything up and the awareness of only getting 4 tracks and whatever you overdub (risky) keeps things refreshingly simple as opposed to the unlimited choices of a DAW where things can quickly and unnecessarily get convoluted and messy.

@NovakTheEnjoyer I always try to keep an "unmerged version" at the back of the track somewhere

@ yes! This is the way 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

@@djcuvcuv 🙌🏼

@@bboyeducator 🙌🏼 I appreciate that man, thank you! Congrats on getting the OP1F! It’s a fun machine and still surprises me all the time. Have fun!

@@BrandonEvansArt sweet! It’s kinda specific with the 2 lenses, but if you have them it’s worth a try.

Thanks for watching!!