Видео

Very very good. Thank you

The Bible speaks of everything being destroyed by elemental heat. Where does that fit in, Dr. Vlach?

Puede alguien traducirlo al español

Seems like LGH is, at best, a somewhat misleading term. Literal apparently doesn't mean what we usually think of as literal (Jesus isn't a literal gate). LGH doesn't seem to encompass Intertextuality (verses and passages that connect or correlate in some meaningful way). Historical, as I think is usually understood, doesn't seem to cover audience relevance. All in all, LGH seems like a mess that doesn't convey much useful meaning.

Trying to interpret the New on the base of the Old is a huge mistake. Israel is no longer a biblical concept. It is a fake nation that used Christian zionism as a pretext to exist. It is interesting that it is very likely that in a few years this present fake state calling itself Israel will cease to exist which again follows 'this generation' since the fake state was created in 1948. It is time that dispensationalists get with the game and fully accept Jesus.

As a former dispensationalist I came to reject it because it was 'another gospel' that basically supported Talmudic Judaism. However since I left that doctrine behind me I no observe how much damage this teaching has done to the churches that follow it. They have pretty much lost their witness. The unwavering support of the nation that calls itself Israel is insane and excuses all kinds of evils. It makes the Catholic church of the 1940s seem saintly in comparison to the dispensationalist churches and there acceptance of any evil the nation that calls itself Israel commits. Right now that nation is committing genocide killing many Christians in the process yet here the dispensationalist churches refuse call evil evil since they misguidedly believe that this will hasten the end. Then there is the evil of the belief in the third temple. Jesus Body is the Third Temple and no man made structure will ever take its place. The Sacrifice He made on the Cross will never be supplanted by animal sacrifice made in a 'temple' made of rocks. I call on all true Christians to leave dispensationalism immediately.

Thank you so much for this incredible explanation of the different views of eschatology. As I work out my understanding of what the enzymes look like or will look like, this kind of content is incredibly helpful. You explained it very clearly and I really appreciate the effort you put in. I would be really interested in having a copy of the document that you used during the presentation. Thanks!

Where can we get physical access to this chart? Is this in one of your books?

30:10 the Lord Jesus is presently reigning according to Acts 2:36, “Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” It is even more clear in 1 Cor. 15:25-26 where Paul says, "For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death.” Is this not clear that Jesus, the Lord, is presently reigning?

13:47 Doesn't Jesus redefine the Passover (1 Cor 5:7 ... “Christ our Passover has been sacrificed”) -- yes. Based on your statement, "Disp. hold that the NT does not reinterpret OT passages..." this means that Disp. is in error hermeneutically, right? What am I missing here? How do Disp. explain the bulk of the letter to the Hebrews? I see this as a huge problem that needs to be addressed.

A very accurate depiction. A shame more believers don't share it. The Mystery of the blindness of Israel. Rom. 11:25.

Amen x1000. I've argued this for a long, long time. It's unfathomable to me that covenant theologians have been able to convince anybody otherwise.

Hello Michael, I really enjoy your books and teaching. I understand the mystery revealed of Jew and Gentile in Christ as new man in the Church. Do you teach that the Church and that distinction of one new man ceases to exist in the millennium and eternal state?

This is great! I’m thinking of taking this course

Are you aware of a dispensational critique, review, or interaction with the works of Jason A. Staples? His two books on this topic are: 1. "The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism: A New Theory of People, Exile, and Israelite Identity" (2021) 2. "Paul and the Resurrection of Israel: Jews, Former Gentiles, Israelites" (2023) From my understanding he is not a covenant theologian; he is a biblical scholar who also does not align with the traditional or New Perspective on Paul. It seems he is approaching the Israel/Church distinction from a different perspective than Reformed theology and dispensationalism, so I thought it would be interesting to hear any interaction with his work from the dispensational side. Any resources or your take on it would be very much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi Michael thanks so much for posting this , it has really helped me understand what in an incredible and mind blowing prophesy and passage. I have heard that the Jewish faith claim the servant is referring to the Nation of Israel. But I agree with you and my pastor that clearly it refers to an individual.. of which clearly Jesus Christ is the only saviour. Best wishes from the UK

Is there a way we can access this word document? I’m an OT teacher and this would be very helpful for me.

Greetings from Puerto Rico, and thanks for your work.

Thanks for this clear explanation!

I recently went through your tms theology 4 material online, and loved the format of the bible you use. Can you tell me the edition? Thanks!

Thank you for this message, Mike. I value you your insights! Natural sons of Abraham (and Isaac and Jacob) = Israel Spiritual sons of Abraham, counted righteous by faith = Israel of God (cultivated olive tree) I believe the spiritual sons of Abraham, including all saints in salvation history (Hebrews 11), made perfect together (Hebrews 11:40;12:23), will also receive a fulfillment of the promises to Abraham and to his Seed. ***** Key verse for the fulfillment to the natural descendants: Romans 9:4 "They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises." ***** To the natural descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, a fulfillment of: - People (Jeremiah 23:3,5-6; Ezekiel 11:17; Ezekiel 20:33-38; Zechariah 13:9; Romans 11:26-27) - Land (Leviticus 26:42; Deuteronomy 11:21; Ezekiel 20:42; Ezekiel 36:28; Jeremiah 30:3) - Blessing (Isaiah 59:20-21; Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 11:19-20; Ezekiel 36:26-27; Ezekiel 37:14; Zechariah 12:10) ***** Key verse for the fulfillment to the spiritual descendants of Abraham, counted righteous by faith; the OT & NT saints: Romans 4:13 "For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. ***** To the spiritual descendants of Abraham, counted righteous by faith, a fulfillment of: - People (Daniel 7:18,22; John 10:16; Ephesians 2:15; Hebrews 11:40, 12:23; Revelation 1:5-6; 5:9; 7:9; 14:4; 19:7-8; 20:4) - Land (Daniel 7:27; Romans 4:13; Matthew 5:5) - Blessing (Daniel 12:1-2; Hebrews 11:40, 12:23; Romans 8:29-30; 1 Corinthians 15:42-44; Philippians 3:20-21; Colossians 3:4; 1 John 3:2; Revelation 20:6) ***** To recap, I believe the promises to Abraham and to his Seed (in the Messianic kingdom) are fulfilled to the natural descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to the spiritual descendants, the sons of Abraham counted righteous by faith. People - Repentant Israel/resurrected saints of God Land - Israel (expanded)/the whole earth Blessing - regeneration/glorification And all of this occurs when the Son of Man returns as King (Daniel 7:14; Matthew 25:31; Revelation 11:15). Blessings

I liked most of it

The claim, "the church is not mentioned in the OT," is frequently heard, in dispensational circles. I'm wondering if it matters to distinguish between implicit and explicit references? Paul does put the church into the category of a musteirion, defined as one of “the mystery" (ies) "of Christ, which in other generations was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed...". Would it be correct to say that Paul's use of "made known" doesn't necessarily mean not mentioned at all, to previous "sons of men", it's just that it is not clearly defined in the OT? As I now understand it, the explicit NT scriptures, that give us a complete description of what the church is, is not found in the OT. But, there are implicit OT references to the church, though the church is not plainly defined in these verses. It was helpful that you pointed out those very OT passages.

Very helpful - thank you Michael!

Thank you very clear and helpful!

Thank God for this Dr. Vlach. Truly you're a blessings for us as novices on this particular belief. Just bought your book, Has the Church Replaced Israel last month. God willing, will purchase more of your books especially that He Will Reign Forever.

That Abraham chart is clutch

Dr. Vlach, I'm enjoying watching all your videos. I've learned so much about the Kingdom and the New Creation Model. I have a question about this video. It is clear from Matthew 23:39 that the Lord is pointing to his second coming (because they are pronounced after Palm Sunday), but in Luke 13:35, that looks like a parallel text, these words are pronounced BEFORE Palm Sunday. How to reconcile this? Blessings

thank you very much

BROTHER MICHAEL, HOW COME CHARTS DONT SHOW THE POST RAPTURE/TRIBULATION PERIOD AS A DISPENSATION ?

Bible reference for 7 dispenssation? you only use man understanding

Are there some shared ideas with preterism and post-millenialism.

Highly recommend 'The Old in the New' book by Michael. Thoroughly enjoyed it and packed with wonderful content

Catholicism has been a lie from the very beginning. Beware of Ecumenicalism

Some books in the New Testament are describing what happened in the Old Testament. I'm not a Jew and I'm not under the law.

Never mix law with grace or you will have neither.

Check Webster's dictionary, it will tell you what it is.

We are in the dispensation of grace right now.

Keep up that podcast on Spotify. What a blessing!

The video series on The Kingdom would be great!

Thank you Christ Jesus my Lord and Saviour for freeing me from all kind of ism. You are my life and dying a gain. You are the great I AM. You are the Son of the living God.

youtube.com/@pastorkhalidjavedbiblemessestv?si=nZfeMo_8qR6WwfK8 ❤❤❤ Good Work 👍🌹 God bless you 🌺🙏💞❣️ Amen 💕🙏🙏🙏

Keep running the race.

Finally fully caught up on all your lectures. I want to thank you, your work was a blessing to me. I look forward for the rest of your work.

Hello, Dr. Vlach. Thank you for this lecture. I just wanted to clarify that Spurgeon did not encounter classical dispensationalism. Darby's dispensationalism is starkly different from Scofield's. There are of course elements that are similar, but I would venture to say Darby would agree more with you than with Scofield (I'm Brethren, so I am familiar with these topics). Anyway, I've read some of Spurgeon's criticism and, as is usual when arguing with non-dispensationalists, there were a lot of misunderstandings because of terminology. God bless.

I have a question since you brough up Daniel 12. As Premils and I made the switch with full confidence yesterday, we believe in the resurrection of the Just and Unjust at separate times. Nonetheless, Daniel 12:2 seems to mention both groups being resurrected at the same time. I mean what is going on there is the statement "at that time" being used as a very broad timeframe? Daniel 12:1-2 12 “At that time Michael, the great prince who protects your people, will arise. There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then. But at that time your people-everyone whose name is found written in the book-will be delivered. 2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.

One thing people miss is that Jesus is truly God and truly man. He is a Jewish man, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, and the seed of David. He retained his humanity in glorified form because he has to be the seed of David who will return to reign on the Throne of David. The aspects of Israel still being in covenant with God today are even confirmed in the Jewish humanity of our Messiah.

Great Presentation.

Would you have the Age to come and the New Heaven and the New earth at the beginning of the Millennium or at the end of the Millennium? The question reminds me of the passage where Jesus said that the children of this age marry and are given in marriage but that it won't be so in the age to come. Now I wonder if that is a reference to the Millennial reign after his 2nd coming or not. Other times I wonder if it's after the millennium and the white throne judgement. 2 Peter 3 makes it seem that it is at his 2nd coming but Revelation 21-22 make it seem like its after the white throne judgement.

This one was the best lecture so far. Even as an Amil I could not deny the passages concerning the salvation of National Israel. I went back and forth with my fellow Amil brothers but they tend to hyper spiritualize passages. Lots of weaknesses in the Amil and Postmil view. This passage will go into my collection of passages concerning the salvation of national Israel. I have 36 video lectures left. I have some questions but I will leave them till after the last lecture incase you answer them in the upcoming videos.