Видео

American and African civs would be amazing to see.

These are better if the galleys are being microed, and it gives them an advantage in fire vs fire. They’re only weaker in a scenario that galleys aren’t being microed. It’s sort of like Arambai how sometimes attacking from their max range makes them weaker than if they attack up close. (Against archers)

Japanese champions defeat samurai. That’s funny

Sogdian Cataphract looks too much like a Steppe Lancer

Advanced Genie Editor shows fire shis have a 0.45 attack dispersion: yes, they have a spread cone of fire so more range means less bulletts hitting

Elephants are super annoying when your friends insist on playing 500 pop michi games and never even consider playing pre-imperial age

Is this one of those trash AI channels? Who wrote this script, and the delivery is so flat

i think the spanish are really good hand canoneer + canons

Please put a pitch on Joan of Arc and make a knight unit Riskin armed with full plate armour. Also, please give the Flemish militia a pike, not a weird stick, to complete it with a prosthetic like an Inca special unit. It's absolutely necessary.

You forgot to do the mameluke

love ur accent man

69 comments nice

How can you make Teutonic knight riders?

What are those towers in the intro? They seem hella buffed

Herbal Medicine?

Faltó el paladín Lituano con 4 reliquias 😢

your hellas accent is heavier than boyar melee armor love u stavros <3

hey stavros

I started watching the video hoping to find copper (reskin proposlas) and actually found gold (Basil II campaign)

Can you do a control of regular champions to do a comparison? Equal resources the berserk outnumbers so you will have lots of times when 4 berserk sates bearing down 1 paladin, and they finish it off a snowball effect happens.

You need to put both units onto no attack stance and manually have them attack each other in order to prevent the unit that has a slower attack animation from glitching out when it gets hit initially. In these tests the imperial camel gets an unfair advantage due to the AI units glitching

I would love to see how they perform against range/siege/monks/buildings (withoit micro)

Hindustani bonus is only for Scout line and camels though

So when it says infantry gets a bonus against cav, does that mean ALL infantry? Does the sword line get a bonus? If you have condo's from an Italy ally, do they get bonus vs cav?

It makes sense that you then need to micro the fire ships since the usability of the tech would be getting more fire ships involved without the need for more to go around or do a flank move to get more surface on the opposing galleon. But their inaccuracy, being negligible at their usual range, actually missed badly on +1 range, also adding noticiable extra overkill since they have the fastest rate of fire of non-cheat units adds to a disastrous design. I would never think of this on my own. Good spot! About blast radius, since bombard towers are meant to cover areas to deter army movement on those and make the land unusable to the opponents, and are also lategame oriented where low hp units are common and sometimes the opponent is forced to throw units in as they stall, it can become even if underwhelming, a net positive, since they are inaccurate even with ballistics due to single proyectiles with low firerate and our old friend, the pathing.

What do Persians do vs byzantines? Byzantine camels kill savar, you can’t make your own camel because byz is better. Kamandaran doesn’t help when there’s byz skirmishers. I think anything Persians make get countered by the byz trash bonus

And yet mangudai would still wipe the floor with them with hit and run.

Now do fast fire ships vs fast fire ships.

I remember when the Georgians first came out, how broken Monaspa was before the nerfs. You just had to mass them to kill almost anything, even castles fell really quickly.

The viking UT berserkegang give more hp regen to berserks and infantey gets +5 against all cav, not +1 archer attack

guessing before reveal Mayan eagle warrior or Roman's centaur

Brother, I would like to contact you for some questions I have.

Fortified wall

well, to begin with if we are comparing a unit "even if it is for fun", there should be criteria and you've not specified any. for example, we can make a list of what are our priorities with siege onagers / onagers. 1- if the priority is to counter archers/skirms then ethiopians is BY far number 1, then you can say celts and koreas and mongols are fine because one is tanky, one is fast and one has the range which is all good to battle it out wiht archers. 2- if our priority is to counter enemy siege onagers/onagers then i'd argue it's koreas and ethiopians "if you try it out it's actually impossible to micro vs ethiopians with their tech" they are far more superior again. but celts and mongols would be decent too. 3- if we are killing some tanky targets 'maybe hussite wagons is an example?" then saracens can be number 1 if it can make the difference between 1 shot and no one shot. other wise saracens would be number one in many situations in team games where you are trying to kill anything in your way "including elephants/ paladins" 4- if we are not talking strictly about post imp then discounts are VERY important for defense specifically because it gives window to boom while fighting off pressre as well as a window to breath if you lose1 or 2 more mangonels than the enemy throughout a prolonged fight. 5- again if we are not talking about post imp "and even in post imp" then now we are also considering which mangonel is faster in killing TCs in which case that would be celts easily. based on all of the above we can then make a list of which criteria is the most important. and even then number one would change based on the situation. but if we are to rate them based on which role is the most important then....> and i'd argue the most important role for siege onagers is killing TCs in castle age and killing archers over all as well as responding to enemy onagers. so in post imp we would have ethiopians easily number 1 and in castle age celts will easily take number 1.

If I could create the Byzantines to be as interesting and as fun to play as possible , This is how I would create DE2 Medieval/Chronicles. (Or if we get a proper Medieval AoE V) Knights of Christendom DLC: docs.google.com/document/d/162BQ0Kx00CCovyNGZxyaAfNo-Bm7sO9q6xG9_ue_7KQ/edit?usp=sharing

Come on Devs! We need this as standard! Is it possible to infuse this data with the data of the ''AoE Civ builder'' mod? My Byzantines there are set up to be so epic, but I currently only use the ME Architecture for them. If this data can be added to that mod that allocates these buildings to the Byzantines, I will be so happy. ruclips.net/video/80fNdNPT8tY/видео.html

We need Jurchens! I said what I said

I think Greek Fire should make Fire Ships attack faster or had a bigger blast radius effect

With a correct micro tuetons wluld have done it.

Negelected? Apart from gambison, these are the ones I prioritize. Arson is one I often miss. Heated Shot is misused. Herecy may be one of the more overlooked. Herbal Medicine and the one making monks move faster are the monk techs I use. The rest is just forgotten about. I hardly even care about remembering them.

The ballista elephant did not do as well as I expected. Interesting

What version is this ??? The graphics are insane

This is very good honestly as infantry (aside from halbs and some unique units) really aren't otherwise very good against almost anything.

Wrong coat of arms for Wallachia. That's Moldavia

Hindustanis didnot get fair play, u got only 1 round of em against strongest units.

Kamayuks might have been worth testing. They'd be the exact opposite to Teuts. Less individual damage, but get the surround much quicker than other civs. Gbeto for the same reason - ranged melee is still melee, right?

this is proof that the longsword is better than the katana, as when the Japanese swap the swords, they win.

Last horse bender

Goths vs catafracts

spies is one of the most useful techs in the game. the problem is that it's too expensive to afford