Vaccines save lives. I remember when vaccines were newer. My parents were incredibly grateful that their own kids wouldn’t have to suffer the effects of measles, polio, tetanus, etc etc. How sad that ignorance has enabled the politicization of vaccines. The Covid vaccines I had certainly made Covid easier for me to get through, with reduced severity of symptoms. Thanks for speaking out.
The hypocrisy is astounding. The conservatives believe in minimal to no government regulation and control right up until the time that it is they who are in a position to exert regulation and control over those matters they want to regulate and control.
Except that they call it "doing my own research". By which they don't mean educating themselves in virology, immunology, and epidemiology to a degree sufficient for you to be able to read and understand those 800 pages regarding the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and then actually reading those 800 pages.
Thanks for the vid and article. My understanding is that the Heritage Foundation and the other organizations have done policy papers for every conservative administration since Reagan. In the last Bush administration, I’ve read that 60% of policies were enacted. Given the make up of the current House and Senate it would be quite easy to see much of this put into action with a conservative administration.
Yes, it's a pendulum even without the invention of the internet and social media to spread anti-vax bullshite. But this one is going to result in a lot of dead and injured children from those diseases.
Maybe these people should walk through the beautiful, old cemeteries back east like my hometown. Entire families of infants and young children are buried there.
@@christinaduffy6618 Family plots were purchased, taking into account the number of children that were expected to die. Multiple children were given the same traditional family name to ensure that the name survive. In the Scottish islands it was common that all would receive the same first name, often with just an initial for the second name (eg; Donald (Donny) B MacLeod, with brothers A, C and D.
@@drusillawinters212 Hmmm...I once wrote a program for a game that you could play against the computer at various levels of difficulty. At the top level, the computer would always beat me.
In early June, the FDA advised manufacturers of licensed and authorised COVID-19 vaccines that updated COVID-19 vaccines should be monovalent JN.1 vaccines. Based on the further evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and a rise in cases of COVID-19, the agency subsequently determined and advised manufacturers that the preferred JN.1-lineage for the COVID-19 vaccines is the KP.2 strain, if feasible. “Vaccination continues to be the cornerstone of COVID-19 prevention,” said Peter Marks, MD, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland. “These updated vaccines meet the agency’s rigorous, scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality.” REALLY PETER, How many mice were tested? How many adolescents were tested?
How about a law prohibiting employees at these agencies taking money from the companies they are regulating. And maybe a better safety system than Vaers since all I hear about it is that it is mostly useless. The phrase "correlation does not equal causation" comes to mind.
You are clearly uniformed and misinformed. There are already conflict of interest and ethics regs preventing what you assert as federal employees at agencies taking monies from companies whose products they approve. This is total nonsense. The VAERS system functions quite well, despite what you “have heard”. And your least statement makes zero sense.
Certainly here in the U.K. all of our regulatory bodies are required by parliamentary edict to obtain most if not all of their funding from the industries or individuals they regulate, from the Civil Aviation Authority to the professional bodies like the Nursing and Midwifery Council.
I currently understand your opening premise indicating ‘this is Trump’s plan’ is incorrect and misleading. Project 2025 is a manifesto length white paper put into the public for consideration. To the best of my knowledge no candidate has specifically indicated ‘this manifesto will be my plan’.
@@markgivens3225 what timestamp did they say that this is trump's plan? Or when did they say a candidate indicated that this manifesto would be their plan?
@@AznDudeIsOn 1:00 This is my biggest gripe about Vincent. He swallows MSM propaganda hook ,line and sinker. No skepticism of any paper that is "peer reviewed". This may work for detailed technical papers in virology, but for epidemiology, nutrition, climate, ect. there is a massive amount of junk out there. He is way to quick to dismiss people as anti-science if they express disagreement or skepticism. Much to reliant on argument from authority of "The Science".
Agree . It's from the Heritage Foundation, and just about every speaker used Trumps name along with this Project at the DNC convention. Flat out lied to public. disappointed with this video also ..
He didn't personally write the plan - he's barely literate - but he's in close association with those who did. He's their useful idiot and as much as he tries to distance himself from it, the photographic and other evidence contradicts this.
Hadn't read her book, but saw the interview that included her brother. She sounds pretty smart! (Unfortunately, looks like you have a troll over here already. Too much ugliness on this page to ever have a good conversation.)
@@OnevoiceOneviewhav g read some pretty dumb comments from one view I would take this one view with a grain of salt. I have not seen a single post from one view that was not ridiculously dumb .
@@OnevoiceOneviewlike I said having seen ridiculous posts from you I was weary of your recommendation because you sound incredibly ignorant . Well turns out true. Casey means takes mostly correct statistics and than throws in her incredibly dumb and harmful ideas which are contrary to the facts. Eg she exaggerates the prevalence of type 2 diabetes stating it’s 50% ( it’s absolutely not ) and then related it to pharna eg how b vaccine and azithromycun eye drips both of these interventions well Proven to save lives. This book is aimed at nut jobs and those unable to think for themselves. I have completed a course on obesity medicine from Harvard from and a course on diabetes from Harvard as well . I know how much as doctors we stress on obesity and nowadays the focus is in child hood obesity.
I’m shocked. I agree with Paul on recommendations. But we could definitely cut back on which vaccines are mandated thus why they. They recommended the COVID vaccine for school age kids but turns out they weren’t needed and even cause more harm than good, specially for those who had COVID already. But I’m with Paul, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
" we could definitely cut back on which vaccines are mandated thus why they. " Yeah, you need some actual expertise. You're just another useless Idaho libertarian. Stay there. Face the religious fundamentalism turning into fascism.
Sorry that you were mislead and lied to and fell for the lie like a sheep instead of checking. COVID vaccines are useful for any age group . In fact the second group after those 65 + is the children under 5 . Also by the end of 2022 ( till we got state ) there were over 50k hospitalizations from COVID among children . 10 k of these were in ICU . Add ling vivid to it and that is a lot of suffering . There is also decrease in IQ after COVID . Only the most cruel would say. children don’t need covid vaccine . The liars say it was more harmful .
Every statement of medical ethics agrees that a person has the right to bodily integrity, to fully informed consent about any medical intervention. Somehow that's ignored when it comes to vaccination...
Another lying anti-vaxxer. You have a choice. You just don't like the ramifications of that choice. You are also fully informed with the known evidence at the time of vaccination. VIS sheets have plenty of information and the inserts are always available for download at any time. So you're a liar.
So, what do you mean by "fully informed"? Does it mean educating yourself in virology, immunology, and epidemiology to a degree sufficient for you to be able to read and understand those 800 pages regarding the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before deciding whether to accept the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination? If not, describe for us what you regard as being "fully informed". Also, do you understand the term "misinformed refusal" of vaccination as pushed by the network of anti-vaccine influencers on social media.
@@williamverhoef4349RUclips isn't fond of links & much description terminology. Try reading the documents! For vaccines in particular, check out the 1986 Vaccine Act.
@@Binkyboy34 My earlier response to William (above) is now TAKEN DOWN. So, how do you expect me to give you any specifics! UPDATE, good, my comment is back - for a few minutes anyway...
It was the mask mandates outside on the beaches and in our parks that made me rebel. I’m with Dr Birx on just give the people the information and let us decide. We will follow recommendations without being mandated. Vincent, have her on your show.
Have you seen the level of dumbness in this thread by antivaxers ? As you can see being an antivaxer is highly associated with inability to think logically and critically . Infectious diseases do not affect only the person who is infected . When is not vaccinating not a dumb decision ? Why should people not mask and why should they be allowed to purposefully infect others at a time when hospitals were overwhelmed ?
Can anyone even say that covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here? How is anyone in the possibility to count that? Hope this comment get published. Please check dutch study about excess deaths and covid-19 vaccines.
The number of lives saved is estimated by comparing the deaths in two groups that only differ in their vaccination status. Such a study was carried out by the ONS for England, where the relative risk of the unvaccinated dying was 4 times that of the vaccinated. About 80% were vaccinated. There were 235K COVID-19 deaths. So by not being vaccinated there were 30 - 40K additional deaths.
"Can anyone even say that covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here?" Yes: The covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here. Done. "How is anyone in the possibility to count that?" Nope. Something that has been done is no longer a possibility. "Hope this comment get published" You do realise that if it wasn't, no one would see that? Right? "Please check dutch study about excess deaths and covid-19 vaccines" Yes. As soon as you identify the study.
"what of no real importance, no informational content the moderators publish" Sounds like BS to me. Give an example. Which moderators? "The rest I try and try. But I will stop" Good. So far, you have only given evidence that what you have to say is no real importance. "Only the so called consensus science allowed." Consensus statements in science are the conclusions reached by recognised experts in the relevant fields of science after collating and assessing ALL the evidence. Sounds like a good move to me.
What if? What if you grew horns and turned into the devil? On the other hand, people DID die by listening to anti-vaccine propaganda. 250,000 unvaccinated Americans in 2021 died of COVID-19. BTW, it is "you're", not "your"; and the "a" should be "and". You're welcome.
@@williamverhoef4349 _"250,000 unvaccinated Americans in 2021 died of COVID-19"_ That sounds about right (6 times that of the UK), but where did get the figure, just so that I attribute it, when I reference these data.Thanks.
Wrong based on ? That’s would be called irrational or imaginary fear while ignoring the real reason that would harm people - not vaccinating. So they are morally and ethically obligated to provide this advice .
Terminating a pregnancy in fallopian tubes has never been considered an abortion in all of history. And to date I’ve never heard of a doctor refusing to preform the necessary procedure. OBGYN in Idaho, I asked.
Hey Idahoan, how are ectopic pregnancies diagnosed? Do you know? It's through an ultrasound. What's wrong with that? They can often times be misdiagnoses because ultrasounds aren't 100% certain. This recently caused a Texas hospital to reject the operation on a woman who eventually died. Hospitals don't care about the individual, they care about the risk to their profits. And it's WORSE in fundamentalist Christian Idaho.
Medically, and this is a medical topic, ending a pregnancy is always considered an abortion, even if entirely natural. Spontaneous abortion is the medical term for all-natural abortion, or miscarriage. Claiming that an induced abortion of a pregnancy outside the womb is not an abortion, or is not considered an abortion, is entirely wrong. .
Vaccines save lives. I remember when vaccines were newer. My parents were incredibly grateful that their own kids wouldn’t have to suffer the effects of measles, polio, tetanus, etc etc. How sad that ignorance has enabled the politicization of vaccines. The Covid vaccines I had certainly made Covid easier for me to get through, with reduced severity of symptoms. Thanks for speaking out.
Thank you both for bringing this to the public's attention
The conservative view is I don't want government on my back... except when it comes to controlling women's bodies.
The hypocrisy is astounding.
The conservatives believe in minimal to no government regulation and control right up until the time that it is they who are in a position to exert regulation and control over those matters they want to regulate and control.
Exactly what l was thinking!
This is very concerning indeed. Thanks for clarifying.
I interesting that they don’t want advise on immunizations but they want government to take away women’s right to decide about their bodies
Trying to make something rational from a thing that is irrational. Just doesn’t work.
I don't like this - the government should stop telling me what to do.
I like this - the government should make it a law.
The hypocrisy is hard to comprehend.
Vote country over party, because we all want to live in a working democracy and P2025 is ridiculous and terrifying
never underestimate the stupidity of the public.
“well i read on twitter that……. "
Yep you are so spot on!
Except that they call it "doing my own research".
By which they don't mean educating themselves in virology, immunology, and epidemiology to a degree sufficient for you to be able to read and understand those 800 pages regarding the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and then actually reading those 800 pages.
My facebook mom’s page says…
are you getting educated from this video? On u tube?
@@summer-wy8gt The source of information matters.
Thanks for the vid and article. My understanding is that the Heritage Foundation and the other organizations have done policy papers for every conservative administration since Reagan. In the last Bush administration, I’ve read that 60% of policies were enacted. Given the make up of the current House and Senate it would be quite easy to see much of this put into action with a conservative administration.
Thank you for this video!
VOTE!
@susanWilder2175
Presumably for Harris 💙
@@richardh8082
Someone who encourages people to vote is not a Trumper.
Maybe a Taylor Swift fan, but not a Trumpet.
Thank you!
next will be no regulation for football stadium structural safety. yikes. poor America...
Yes, if one falls down, we will just build another one.
People are going stop vaccinating their kids, given the rise of the anti vax movement. We’re going to see a bunch of old childhood illnesses come back
Yes, it's a pendulum even without the invention of the internet and social media to spread anti-vax bullshite. But this one is going to result in a lot of dead and injured children from those diseases.
Maybe these people should walk through the beautiful, old cemeteries back east like my hometown. Entire families of infants and young children are buried there.
@@christinaduffy6618 Family plots were purchased, taking into account the number of children that were expected to die.
Multiple children were given the same traditional family name to ensure that the name survive.
In the Scottish islands it was common that all would receive the same first name, often with just an initial for the second name (eg; Donald (Donny) B MacLeod, with brothers A, C and D.
Goodness. We are so thankless . I only have two children a boy and girl .
omg, where the heck are we going .. thanks p & v
Since we don't seem capable of doing it on our own, maybe Artifical Intelligence can help us solve Artifical Ignorance.
I hope this is sarcasm. AI uses imput from humans to determine output. Garbage in; garbage out, as we used to say in computing.
@@drusillawinters212
Hmmm...I once wrote a program for a game that you could play against the computer at various levels of difficulty. At the top level, the computer would always beat me.
In early June, the FDA advised manufacturers of licensed and authorised COVID-19 vaccines that updated COVID-19 vaccines should be monovalent JN.1 vaccines. Based on the further evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and a rise in cases of COVID-19, the agency subsequently determined and advised manufacturers that the preferred JN.1-lineage for the COVID-19 vaccines is the KP.2 strain, if feasible.
“Vaccination continues to be the cornerstone of COVID-19 prevention,” said Peter Marks, MD, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland. “These updated vaccines meet the agency’s rigorous, scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality.”
REALLY PETER, How many mice were tested? How many adolescents were tested?
Herp derp, they aren't new vaccines, they are successors. They are following the regulations, anti-vaxxer.
Oh MAN, talk about a comment the FRIED the commenter, DAVID, you antivax loon.
How about a law prohibiting employees at these agencies taking money from the companies they are regulating. And maybe a better safety system than Vaers since all I hear about it is that it is mostly useless. The phrase "correlation does not equal causation" comes to mind.
You are clearly uniformed and misinformed.
There are already conflict of interest and ethics regs preventing what you assert as federal employees at agencies taking monies from companies whose products they approve. This is total nonsense.
The VAERS system functions quite well, despite what you “have heard”.
And your least statement makes zero sense.
Certainly here in the U.K. all of our regulatory bodies are required by parliamentary edict to obtain most if not all of their funding from the industries or individuals they regulate, from the Civil Aviation Authority to the professional bodies like the Nursing and Midwifery Council.
@ryanlynch3579
When you say 'all I hear about it', where are you hearing this? The internet? (rolls eyes)
I agree….but this is what happens when you deregulate and underfund public health departments.
@@kerrissedai6857
No. It’s what happens when you have a fact-free, prevaricating felon masquerading as a real President.
I was hoping you'd ask Paul about Novavax approval.
I currently understand your opening premise indicating ‘this is Trump’s plan’ is incorrect and misleading. Project 2025 is a manifesto length white paper put into the public for consideration. To the best of my knowledge no candidate has specifically indicated ‘this manifesto will be my plan’.
@@markgivens3225 what timestamp did they say that this is trump's plan? Or when did they say a candidate indicated that this manifesto would be their plan?
In the snip of Dr. Offit’s article that shows around 0:40 and again in his opening statement between 1:00 and 1:10
@@AznDudeIsOn 1:00 This is my biggest gripe about Vincent. He swallows MSM propaganda hook ,line and sinker. No skepticism of any paper that is "peer reviewed". This may work for detailed technical papers in virology, but for epidemiology, nutrition, climate, ect. there is a massive amount of junk out there. He is way to quick to dismiss people as anti-science if they express disagreement or skepticism. Much to reliant on argument from authority of "The Science".
Agree . It's from the Heritage Foundation, and just about every speaker used Trumps name along with this Project at the DNC convention. Flat out lied to public. disappointed with this video also ..
He didn't personally write the plan - he's barely literate - but he's in close association with those who did. He's their useful idiot and as much as he tries to distance himself from it, the photographic and other evidence contradicts this.
I’d love to hear your take on the book “Good Energy” by Casey Means MD
She's a quack who publishes no peer-reviewed research.
Hadn't read her book, but saw the interview that included her brother. She sounds pretty smart! (Unfortunately, looks like you have a troll over here already. Too much ugliness on this page to ever have a good conversation.)
@@OnevoiceOneviewhav g read some pretty dumb comments from one view I would take this one view with a grain of salt. I have not seen a single post from one view that was not ridiculously dumb .
@@OnevoiceOneviewlike I said having seen ridiculous posts from you I was weary of your recommendation because you sound incredibly ignorant . Well turns out true.
Casey means takes mostly correct statistics and than throws in her incredibly dumb and harmful ideas which are contrary to the facts.
Eg she exaggerates the prevalence of type 2 diabetes stating it’s 50% ( it’s absolutely not ) and then related it to pharna eg how b vaccine and azithromycun eye drips both of these interventions well
Proven to save lives. This book is aimed at nut jobs and those unable to think for themselves.
I have completed a course on obesity medicine from Harvard from and a course on diabetes from Harvard as well . I know how much as doctors we stress on obesity and nowadays the focus is in child hood obesity.
@@Sceince007 You can't seriously believe that anyone would listen to you, the way you present yourself. Trolling must pay extremely well.
I’m shocked. I agree with Paul on recommendations. But we could definitely cut back on which vaccines are mandated thus why they. They recommended the COVID vaccine for school age kids but turns out they weren’t needed and even cause more harm than good, specially for those who had COVID already. But I’m with Paul, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bath water.
" we could definitely cut back on which vaccines are mandated thus why they. "
Yeah, you need some actual expertise. You're just another useless Idaho libertarian. Stay there. Face the religious fundamentalism turning into fascism.
Sorry that you were mislead and lied to and fell for the lie like a sheep instead of checking.
COVID vaccines are useful for any age group . In fact the second group after those 65 + is the children under 5 .
Also by the end of 2022 ( till we got state ) there were over 50k hospitalizations from COVID among children . 10 k of these were in ICU . Add ling vivid to it and that is a lot of suffering . There is also decrease in IQ after COVID .
Only the most cruel would say. children don’t need covid vaccine . The liars say it was more harmful .
❤
Hello Paul "for profit" Offit 👋
Haha you always come with the lies and never miss the opportunity to show how cheap you are
Stupid ad hominem.
And you still don't know what an ad hominem is, Jasper.
@@Binkyboy34 Oh boy 🙄
Typical childish response.
how many did it take
How many of what did it take to do what?
Every statement of medical ethics agrees that a person has the right to bodily integrity, to fully informed consent about any medical intervention. Somehow that's ignored when it comes to vaccination...
Another lying anti-vaxxer.
You have a choice. You just don't like the ramifications of that choice.
You are also fully informed with the known evidence at the time of vaccination. VIS sheets have plenty of information and the inserts are always available for download at any time.
So you're a liar.
So, what do you mean by "fully informed"?
Does it mean educating yourself in virology, immunology, and epidemiology to a degree sufficient for you to be able to read and understand those 800 pages regarding the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before deciding whether to accept the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination?
If not, describe for us what you regard as being "fully informed".
Also, do you understand the term "misinformed refusal" of vaccination as pushed by the network of anti-vaccine influencers on social media.
@@williamverhoef4349RUclips isn't fond of links & much description terminology. Try reading the documents! For vaccines in particular, check out the 1986 Vaccine Act.
@@OnevoiceOneview Check out what, exactly? Be specific. You have yet to actually make any claims based in any sort of evidence.
@@Binkyboy34 My earlier response to William (above) is now TAKEN DOWN. So, how do you expect me to give you any specifics! UPDATE, good, my comment is back - for a few minutes anyway...
It was the mask mandates outside on the beaches and in our parks that made me rebel. I’m with Dr Birx on just give the people the information and let us decide. We will follow recommendations without being mandated.
Vincent, have her on your show.
Have you seen the level of dumbness in this thread by antivaxers ? As you can see being an antivaxer is highly associated with inability to think logically and critically . Infectious diseases do not affect only the person who is infected .
When is not vaccinating not a dumb decision ?
Why should people not mask and why should they be allowed to purposefully infect others at a time when hospitals were overwhelmed ?
Can anyone even say that covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here? How is anyone in the possibility to count that? Hope this comment get published. Please check dutch study about excess deaths and covid-19 vaccines.
The number of lives saved is estimated by comparing the deaths in two groups that only differ in their vaccination status. Such a study was carried out by the ONS for England, where the relative risk of the unvaccinated dying was 4 times that of the vaccinated. About 80% were vaccinated. There were 235K COVID-19 deaths. So by not being vaccinated there were 30 - 40K additional deaths.
You didn't cite a "dutch study" and I don't think you know what you're talking about, anti-vaxxer.
What kind of evidence would YOU accept?
"Can anyone even say that covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here?"
Yes: The covid-19 vaccines saved the amount of lives that is put forward here. Done.
"How is anyone in the possibility to count that?"
Nope. Something that has been done is no longer a possibility.
"Hope this comment get published"
You do realise that if it wasn't, no one would see that? Right?
"Please check dutch study about excess deaths and covid-19 vaccines"
Yes. As soon as you identify the study.
Go fly a kite.
"what of no real importance, no informational content the moderators publish"
Sounds like BS to me. Give an example. Which moderators?
"The rest I try and try. But I will stop"
Good. So far, you have only given evidence that what you have to say is no real importance.
"Only the so called consensus science allowed."
Consensus statements in science are the conclusions reached by recognised experts in the relevant fields of science after collating and assessing ALL the evidence.
Sounds like a good move to me.
But what if your wrong a people die because of your advice ?
Please educate yourself on medical treatments and statistics. It would also help if you studied English.
What if?
What if you grew horns and turned into the devil?
On the other hand, people DID die by listening to anti-vaccine propaganda.
250,000 unvaccinated Americans in 2021 died of COVID-19.
BTW, it is "you're", not "your"; and the "a" should be "and".
You're welcome.
@@williamverhoef4349 _"250,000 unvaccinated Americans in 2021 died of COVID-19"_
That sounds about right (6 times that of the UK), but where did get the figure, just so that I attribute it, when I reference these data.Thanks.
Wrong based on ? That’s would be called irrational or imaginary fear while ignoring the real reason that would harm people - not vaccinating. So they are morally and ethically obligated to provide this advice .
Terminating a pregnancy in fallopian tubes has never been considered an abortion in all of history. And to date I’ve never heard of a doctor refusing to preform the necessary procedure. OBGYN in Idaho, I asked.
Hey Idahoan, how are ectopic pregnancies diagnosed? Do you know?
It's through an ultrasound. What's wrong with that? They can often times be misdiagnoses because ultrasounds aren't 100% certain. This recently caused a Texas hospital to reject the operation on a woman who eventually died.
Hospitals don't care about the individual, they care about the risk to their profits. And it's WORSE in fundamentalist Christian Idaho.
Medically, and this is a medical topic, ending a pregnancy is always considered an abortion, even if entirely natural. Spontaneous abortion is the medical term for all-natural abortion, or miscarriage. Claiming that an induced abortion of a pregnancy outside the womb is not an abortion, or is not considered an abortion, is entirely wrong.
.