Another frightening aspect of Project 2025. I've been compiling resources across disciplines for the purpose of educating voters. The Heritage Foundation is the real villain behind the curtain.
Most People got vaxxed, most people do respect researchers. I know I am thankful, you guys keep up the fight! Now full disclosure, I was a lab technician during my time at the University of California. So maybe I am biased because I saw a lot of peeps putting in a LOT of time for not a lot of notoriety or pay. TBH 99.9% of the people are good and honest, the system may need some tweaks from time to time, the publish or perish is a thing, good outcomes are more published than bad but it's the " consensus " of these good, smart,knowledgeable people that are the drivers of good science which benefits all humanity! In short, thanks for sharing the discussion!
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." ~John Kenneth Galbraith
Honestly, scientists are some of the most underpaid people in the world, who work very long hours, and often receive very little recognition or gratitude. No one goes into this field for prestige and for financial riches. The work is too long, too hard and frankly, punishing, at times.
Some people are in Incentivized by a sincere wish to solve difficult problems, improve patients lives and don’t give a care about the publishing burden or process. But we still need to be paid and big Pharma and government should not take all of the work product, ideas, designs, and not compensate me and others. They shouldn’t cheat and steal. They shouldn’t harass. The work needs to get done because it is necessary for public health and safety. The paperwork and administrative process and bureaucracy cost time and lives. Me doing work which is expedient and necessary does not mean financial compensation is not owed. I am still due fair compensation for work performed.
Some people want to put vaccines in a broader context. If the goal is just to get in a cycle of publishing and getting grant money to do more research, that omits what some people think are more important goals of curtailing the spread of infectious diseases and mitigation measures, and therapeutic options when people get sick. COVID was the pandemic that brought indoor air quality and air purifiers to the forefront. We still have too many nosocomial infections. And we should improve air quality in concert with vaccines which are safe and effective. We shouldn’t deny medical care to the unvaccinated nor should we vilify parents or people who are afraid of getting adverse events. Tony Fauci and others were very highly paid. I am being made to be impoverished via seemingly coordinated undermining and denial of services on platforms necessary to obtain funding. There is a marked unfairness and inequity. My current assets are under threat in retaliation for a number of points of view which were at time in opposition to NIH, CDC and other official leaders and advisers.
But super hero Dr Fauci was extremely underpaid . 400k which Dr of that fame makes this little these these days ? He could open a clinic and millions each year . His efforts over the year saved millions of lives .
Maybe must relearn technique of strict intramuscular injection ? Maybe historicaly ,by using one siringue with many doses,changing only needles after each inoculation, risk of contamination of siringue with blood,modified standard technique of strict intramuscular injection by vaccinologs ? Maybe mRNA must not blood spread and transfect only cells at injected site ?
My funding has been obstructed, blocked my valuables stolen, I am uncredited, disavowed, isolated. The funding process has monkey wrenches thrown in the work and processes of people NIH doesn’t like. It is not fair land is highly discriminatory including sex discrimination and corporate favoritism. There seems no recourse for stolen intellectual property.
@@LisaMartinez-ri6ve I’m in San Diego California and my communications are so spoofed and rerouted, I can’t even get an attorney for anything from intellectual property to anything else without it being obstructed or a denial of service along the way which obstructs communications.
Project 2025 is really dystopian stuff. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience, Gentlemen.
Another frightening aspect of Project 2025. I've been compiling resources across disciplines for the purpose of educating voters. The Heritage Foundation is the real villain behind the curtain.
Most People got vaxxed, most people do respect researchers. I know I am thankful, you guys keep up the fight! Now full disclosure, I was a lab technician during my time at the University of California. So maybe I am biased because I saw a lot of peeps putting in a LOT of time for not a lot of notoriety or pay. TBH 99.9% of the people are good and honest, the system may need some tweaks from time to time, the publish or perish is a thing, good outcomes are more published than bad but it's the " consensus " of these good, smart,knowledgeable people that are the drivers of good science which benefits all humanity! In short, thanks for sharing the discussion!
Great talk. Thank you. 😎👍🩺⚕️🦠💉
Thank you gentleman for explaining so clearly . Keep up the good work 🇬🇧🇬🇧
Thank you all for sharing your expertise , so important 😊
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."
~John Kenneth Galbraith
Honestly, scientists are some of the most underpaid people in the world, who work very long hours, and often receive very little recognition or gratitude. No one goes into this field for prestige and for financial riches. The work is too long, too hard and frankly, punishing, at times.
great ep!
Always welcome!!!
Some people are in Incentivized by a sincere wish to solve difficult problems, improve patients lives and don’t give a care about the publishing burden or process. But we still need to be paid and big Pharma and government should not take all of the work product, ideas, designs, and not compensate me and others. They shouldn’t cheat and steal. They shouldn’t harass. The work needs to get done because it is necessary for public health and safety. The paperwork and administrative process and bureaucracy cost time and lives. Me doing work which is expedient and necessary does not mean financial compensation is not owed. I am still due fair compensation for work performed.
The sheer ignorance just makes me want to cry.
Thank you so much . These are among my heroes
Some people want to put vaccines in a broader context. If the goal is just to get in a cycle of publishing and getting grant money to do more research, that omits what some people think are more important goals of curtailing the spread of infectious diseases and mitigation measures, and therapeutic options when people get sick. COVID was the pandemic that brought indoor air quality and air purifiers to the forefront. We still have too many nosocomial infections. And we should improve air quality in concert with vaccines which are safe and effective. We shouldn’t deny medical care to the unvaccinated nor should we vilify parents or people who are afraid of getting adverse events. Tony Fauci and others were very highly paid. I am being made to be impoverished via seemingly coordinated undermining and denial of services on platforms necessary to obtain funding. There is a marked unfairness and inequity. My current assets are under threat in retaliation for a number of points of view which were at time in opposition to NIH, CDC and other official leaders and advisers.
But super hero Dr Fauci was extremely underpaid . 400k which Dr of that fame makes this little these these days ?
He could open a clinic and millions each year .
His efforts over the year saved millions of lives .
Moderna's MRNA vax is routed in research done at NIH. Is this parallel research the Biontech has done for the Pfizer MRNA vax?
Yes.
Both use the Kariko-Weissman mRNA research funded by the NIH
@@lesfaby8997 Thank you Les
And those vaccines were surprisingly successful. Tens of millions of lives were saved. The recorded facts proves that reality.
So it will go something like "paid for external committees too?"
The main 'production' company has had to release thousands of pages of THIER own data. Class actions are using this now.
?
From what we already know there is no crime in any of the process. So this is a waste of time.
Yeah the information misused by antivaxers to deceive their du mb audiences.
Maybe must relearn technique of strict intramuscular injection ?
Maybe historicaly ,by using one siringue with many doses,changing only needles after each inoculation, risk of contamination of siringue with blood,modified standard technique of strict intramuscular injection by vaccinologs ?
Maybe mRNA must not blood spread and transfect only cells at injected site ?
Vaccines are now supplied in prefilled single dose AD (Auto-Disable/Auto-Detach) syringes. These cannot be used for aspiration prior to vaccination.
@@christopherrobinson7541 and risk of intravesel inject ...
@@christopherrobinson7541 WHO care If mRNA liposomes blood spread ?
'MURICA
My funding has been obstructed, blocked my valuables stolen, I am uncredited, disavowed, isolated. The funding process has monkey wrenches thrown in the work and processes of people NIH doesn’t like. It is not fair land is highly discriminatory including sex discrimination and corporate favoritism. There seems no recourse
for stolen intellectual property.
Yes there is a recourse for stolen intellectual property ,at least in the US.
@@LisaMartinez-ri6ve I’m in San Diego California and my communications are so spoofed and rerouted, I can’t even get an attorney for anything from intellectual property to anything else without it being obstructed or a denial of service along the way which obstructs communications.
Thankyou guys