1 the throttle & Pratio is 10% in the layer log your comparing to. You know there is so many variables to take into account here. I see what your saying but MBT it not the only limit factor ngc3. Thanks for the videos by the way keep up the great work hello from state of Maine.
Thank for watching, the 04 QC with the 6.1 I did some videos on, also pushed up past the MBT table "limits" more so then I would like....The 04 4x4 RC I mention in the last video of the QC 4x4 w/ the 6.1 was also doing it, same area , between 55K and 70K just as the trans was getting ready to shift in to 3rd...when I pulled the 545 out of that truck(the RC4x4 w/6.1) and replaced it with the 46RH it never repeated the passing of the MBT table. On my o5 Bee(in this video) after I zero'd out the spark efficiency table , it hasn't gone above any of the tables I have set to 24* max timing, and it picked up .15 in the 1/4 on average on the next 10 passes.
The data on the left in your channels doesn't match the data in your graphs. You have a logging delay. Turn your polling speed up on those channels. Pause at 1:34 and see for yourself.
Yes there's logging delay between "left" channels and graphs, it's set to 0, polling there's glitch between the Channels and graphs, chart/time ,gauges but the the IMPORTIANT parts( Graph, Gauge, Chart/time) are all spot on. None of the information in this Video is based on Channels. There's over 70 hours of Logging on this 05, with stock tables, it was constantly exceeding MBT table values when running under 60KPA, in the 1500-2500 RPM range......doesn't matter what Polling interval is used. The 06 Charger I just sold(converted in to a "ute") did the same thing before the new engine went in, I have 10 more vehicle log sets that do the same thing. (04 Ram, 08 C300, 09 SRTChallneger, 14 SRT392 charger., 06 Magnum, 07 2500 Ram, 09 Ram, 14 ram, 05 Ram) and all of them are down on pressure in one or more cylinders.
![LAVROV's interview with Tucker CARLSON 😁 [Parody]](/img/1.gif)
1 the throttle & Pratio is 10% in the layer log your comparing to. You know there is so many variables to take into account here. I see what your saying but MBT it not the only limit factor ngc3. Thanks for the videos by the way keep up the great work hello from state of Maine.
Thank for watching, the 04 QC with the 6.1 I did some videos on, also pushed up past the MBT table "limits" more so then I would like....The 04 4x4 RC I mention in the last video of the QC 4x4 w/ the 6.1 was also doing it, same area , between 55K and 70K just as the trans was getting ready to shift in to 3rd...when I pulled the 545 out of that truck(the RC4x4 w/6.1) and replaced it with the 46RH it never repeated the passing of the MBT table.
On my o5 Bee(in this video) after I zero'd out the spark efficiency table , it hasn't gone above any of the tables I have set to 24* max timing, and it picked up .15 in the 1/4 on average on the next 10 passes.
The data on the left in your channels doesn't match the data in your graphs. You have a logging delay. Turn your polling speed up on those channels. Pause at 1:34 and see for yourself.
Yes there's logging delay between "left" channels and graphs, it's set to 0, polling there's glitch between the Channels and graphs, chart/time ,gauges but the the IMPORTIANT parts( Graph, Gauge, Chart/time) are all spot on.
None of the information in this Video is based on Channels. There's over 70 hours of Logging on this 05, with stock tables, it was constantly exceeding MBT table values when running under 60KPA, in the 1500-2500 RPM range......doesn't matter what Polling interval is used. The 06 Charger I just sold(converted in to a "ute") did the same thing before the new engine went in, I have 10 more vehicle log sets that do the same thing. (04 Ram, 08 C300, 09 SRTChallneger, 14 SRT392 charger., 06 Magnum, 07 2500 Ram, 09 Ram, 14 ram, 05 Ram) and all of them are down on pressure in one or more cylinders.