SUZUKI S-Cross Review | Is it BETTER than the Vitara?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 янв 2025

Комментарии • 35

  • @Naveed4Speed
    @Naveed4Speed  8 месяцев назад +1

    Suzuki S-Cross or Suzuki Vitara?

    • @AmurTiger-vm5dy
      @AmurTiger-vm5dy 5 месяцев назад +1

      Vitara win easy 😂

    • @vme23
      @vme23 5 месяцев назад +4

      S-Cross 1.4T Mild-Hybrid all the way!

    • @AmurTiger-vm5dy
      @AmurTiger-vm5dy 5 месяцев назад

      @@vme23 😅😅🤣🤣🤣👎👎👎

  • @sbizaoui
    @sbizaoui 2 месяца назад +1

    I saw your review. It was well done and beneficial. It was an interesting help for the car I was considering buying.

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  2 месяца назад

      Thank you for watching! I'm glad I can help make it easier to make a decision. Let me know what you end up doing 👍

  • @Wildmountainsafaris
    @Wildmountainsafaris 4 месяца назад +1

    I’ve had 2 Suzukis - a mk 2 swift sport and a Vitara S - both superb. Now the S cross Allgrip (last 3 years was a Mini Cooper S clubman)

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  4 месяца назад

      Hey that's awesome! What do you think of it?

    • @nzxtsnue1139
      @nzxtsnue1139 4 месяца назад +1

      what's the point of your comment ?

  • @SimonJackson-r7o
    @SimonJackson-r7o 6 месяцев назад

    Just bought a second hand 2022 motion version. Glad to see a favourable review!

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  6 месяцев назад +1

      Hey that's awesome. How are you finding it so far?

    • @SimonJackson-r7o
      @SimonJackson-r7o 6 месяцев назад

      @@Naveed4Speed Well, only drove it back from the carshop yesterday for a couple of hours, but impressed with the fuel economy. Still need to get to grips with all the controls!
      Mine is the MHEV, so the boot space seems bigger than you showed? 48v battery is under passenger seat.

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  6 месяцев назад

      Yes, I drove the 1.5 Hybrid with AllGrip four-wheel-drive. How did you find the manual gearbox in the MHEV? I need to give that one a try.

  • @ArianoMarini
    @ArianoMarini 15 дней назад

    Auto fantastica..
    Personalmente molto soddisfatto.❤

  • @kf4057
    @kf4057 2 месяца назад

    Hi, very nice review. When you are driving on the highway with 120 to 130 km/hour, the noise level is acceptable or too high?

    • @BlackJack-ev3ko
      @BlackJack-ev3ko 2 месяца назад

      Same question 😉🤔

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  2 месяца назад +1

      I wouldn't be able to tell you as I've only driven it up to around 110 km/h but I will tell you that the noise is only high during acceleration, once you get up to speed it is acceptable. Even when you are accelerating the noise isn't that bad so I wouldn't worry.

  • @Midas_massages
    @Midas_massages 8 месяцев назад +2

    Good video

  • @cybercloudx4955
    @cybercloudx4955 2 месяца назад

    Question: both new vehicles with 0 km... Ford Puma 1.0 125hp 2023 year or S cross 2024 mild hybrid 1.4 both manual..? Puma has 5 years warranty, and I don't know anything about Suzuki, for long term driving usage.. Yearly millage won't be much..
    For example with Ecosport little over 13k made within 4 years ... Ecosport is on absolutely perfect condition without any scratch, only lack is little visibility on back side in reverse in town but has sensors, basically sad to let him go, so we considered Puma due to 5 year warranty and it's new car lighter little improved ecoboost engine , good torque taking in consideration of getting it + some so called action prices are active in this part of Europe ... Puma 21k S cross close to 20k (usually it's more expensive ).. Any tips, point of view / advice.. Curious

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  2 месяца назад

      Hey, the S-Cross usually is more expensive so you're getting a great deal if I understand it correctly. The S-Cross is spacious and practical, and even cheap to run on fuel, but the Puma might have it beat on insurance. I haven't driven a Puma but it's probably more engaging to drive, and it has the slightly better looking interior in my opinion. Suzuki is a dependable brand so you shouldn't have any problems, and they offer a 7 year/100k miles warranty so it gives that peace of mind. Ultimately there isn't much between them but you should think about what you value most. The Suzuki seems the more sensible choice of the 2, but the Puma might be more suited to you if you had an Ecosport. Let me know what you decide

    • @cybercloudx4955
      @cybercloudx4955 2 месяца назад

      @Naveed4Speed it'll be either Puma or staying with Ecosport .. Car has absolute 0 scratch .. This is unbelievable to me.. I'm watching where to park car as well , but sometimes/often isn't easy to find any parking space at all, so in surprised there's not even tiny scratch from other doors opening ... Puma sadly doesn't have co driver seat adjustable by height neither does seat belt , both are fixed .. For me as driver it's OK since drivers seat is adjustable by height although seat belt is fixed with height , but it has overall more equipment .. It's unbelievable for me that even in 2024 any manufacturing vehicle product would do such thing, especially Ford who provides led lights, sensors for accidental lane switch... Anyway , I more came here to let you know that I appreciate effort and time for responding me.. All the best

  • @gericklacross18
    @gericklacross18 Месяц назад +1

    I chose S-Cross

  • @CosgroveNotts
    @CosgroveNotts 8 месяцев назад +1

    I was not impressed with auto gearbox. Old switches inside car. Quite noisy 60mph

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  8 месяцев назад +1

      I'd love to try the manual but I believe that's only in the mild hybrid version. The interior is behind competitors but it's simple and easy to use. The noise at 60mph does seem like you're pushing the car so that's why I'd say the car is more suited to urban environments. Thanks for watching

    • @thurules
      @thurules 19 дней назад

      what issue is there in auto gearbox?

  • @KasperWalterQ5
    @KasperWalterQ5 8 месяцев назад +1

    Dacia Duster better

    • @Naveed4Speed
      @Naveed4Speed  8 месяцев назад +1

      The Dacia Duster is a popular choice that offers great value at a lower price point

    • @KasperWalterQ5
      @KasperWalterQ5 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@Naveed4SpeedI will rob the bank and buy one

    • @liv0003
      @liv0003 8 месяцев назад +8

      Defently not, Dacia is less expensive but it is for a reason. Is a cheap made car and with performances not even comparable. This Suzuki a million times better for the price

    • @KasperWalterQ5
      @KasperWalterQ5 8 месяцев назад

      ​@liv0003 On off road the Duster leaves the Suzuki S-Cross in the DUST 😅

    • @AmurTiger-vm5dy
      @AmurTiger-vm5dy 5 месяцев назад +1

      Dacia duster ??😅😅😅😅😅