Ngl I loved the build aspect of 4 because I was able to change the world I was playing in and make it mine. And that whole “rebuilding the wasteland” I was living my mayor fantasy lmao.
Rebuilding? You were able to build slums basically (without modding the settlement system), because the buildings you were able to create all looked like a Favela! It would have been more fun if it had been less clunky (better menus to tell your settlers what to do for example and buildings like an armory to give them decent weapons) and if it allowed you to build relatively cleanly (Shady Sands style or Vault City if you get more invested!)...building shacks is not fun!
@@dreamingflurry2729 it might not be fun to you, but I built a lot before I used mods and I still got a lot of enjoyment out of it. I really like the aesthetic of a hobbled together settlement made by people who don’t know how to build.
My hope is that they expand on the npc's part in the game to make them more believable, with greater range in responses to questions and reputation. The npc's always felt too two dimensional.
I agree one of the biggest problems with bethesda fallout is the fact that everything in the world happens only to you. there is no change at all among the npcs & environment unless the player is the one directly causing it. different from new vegas where it feels like the ncr, legion, and mr house are all making their moves with or without the player's help.
Also companions feel different. You make an impact on your friends you travel with in a horizontal way, not vertically. There is no good or bad choice, it's only what you may think is best and dealing with the consequences.
Unfortunately characters can only be as cunning, endearing & terrifying etc as the people who write them. Those types of people obvs aren't at these studios for the most part.
Fallout 4 didn’t make me remember it because of how good the story or world was, it was because the sheer amount of time I spent just modding it. When I played Fallout 76, it was memorable, because I had to explore more. The world was more lively, and while the decision of no NPCs sucked, it felt more real to me.
I think that was the point of 76. No npcs to represent the lifeless and emptiness of the environments two decades after a nuclear fallout. It gave 76 and West Virginia a depressing atmosphere but in a good way, but I think not alot of people see it that way since they get too lazy to explore places to search for stories, lore etc, and would rather just hear them from npcs
When I played fallout 76 it was memorable as the only time I've ever spent 60 dollars to play a game for 2 hours. I'm planning to go back and try again soon though since there have been alot of updates. Is it actually good now?
@@dragonborn-oq6kj yeah it’s actually pretty good now. It’s still pretty buggy but besides that they have actual npc’s now as well as there being a lot more to do in the game
I think it would be cool to have it on the west coast maybe 10 or 20 years after NV npcs in NV are always talking about how the ncr are spreading themselves to thin and in the end they do and collapse from the inside so most ncr are called back to their main city creating a power vacuum allowing for new factions to pop up and fight for the territories that the ncr had to leave behind and the land is plunged into chaos
I agree, I want to see a Bethesda version of the HUB. I feel if they were to expand on the choice makeing mechanics over all and keep the art style of 4 it would make a good game.
While there's a part of me that would love to see California, post-New Vegas... There's also part of me that would sort of hate it, since America is a big place and we've already had three of the six "mainline" Fallout games (1, 2, New Vegas) heavily involve it. I want to see how New Orleans is in the Fallout universe, I want to see Chicago (and how much of Tactics is canon), I'd love to see my home city of Detroit, or the twin cities; Minneapolis and St. Paul. Seattle could be cool, too, with some nifty rad weather.
@@ashirii8347 Wouldn't that kind of ruin the RPG? What if you disagree about how to proceed (extreme example, say Fallout NV had this and your friend likes the Legion, which you want to shoot on sight and want to side with House!), you can't have the same world-state (unless only the host controls the story?)
I love having the camp from fallout 76, being able to pick almost anywhere where you want to build. In fallout 4 I liked building an empire through settlements and supply lines, so I hope Fallout 5 will have both a camp and settlement system. Also I would like to add the building of robots from fallout 4 dlc into fallout 5.
As long as the building system is still optional (some PC-Characters might not care at all about settling anything and neither do some players), less clunky (damned sometimes you had to fight the system to get something the way you wanted it and hell, you couldn't even manage your settlers directly via a menu!) and as long as it allows clean building (I hate building something that looks like it is straight out of Mad Max...or a Favela in RL! I would have loved to kind of build Shady Sands or Vault City, not rusty shacks!)
The supply lines was a great idea for settlements but I think f4 had too many settlements to look after. If you could create supply lines with settlements that aren't yours be cool
Though that can get muddled a bit, since it's also the "How did you see yourself in these positions?" I would've tried to go for an "Time to implement the institute into the wasteland and actually try to rebuild the commonwealth." Because The Institute, had cures for most illness, had advanced sciences... I would probably figure out an way for prosthetics (like the concept art) and/or use Gen 2 synth parts for prosthetics, if people prefer robotic limbs over the near-human looking ones.
@@wolfenrichtophen6010 That is my head-canon, blowing up the Institute? Such a waste! Especially if you side the with fascists (BoS! Maxson is a racist fascist who deserves a bullet to the head! This entitled little boy should never have been given leadership!)...not that 'Save the Toasters' is much better and hell, 'Weak Sauce' (the Minutemen...who are nothing without the player and the weakest faction over all! They don't have power armor unless you give them your's, they only use shoddy weapons, they don't even wear military armor (like say the Gunners!)) is even worse! Hell, the only faction that gets stuff done without the player, is the Institute!
@@dreamingflurry2729 Well, if the game took longer to release, we know that there was going to be 13 something pipe gun variants, an mercenary group with jetpacks, minuteman laser cannons.. And a way to make the laser musket more viable, possibly plasma.
Same for the endings of New Vegas if this is done. I'll take any reference to the Mojave I could get. Also, if it were to be an NCR or Legion ending they'll likely be in the East by the time Fallout 5 takes place
Boston is actually a really cool place personally I’m never been there but the one of the main factions in fallout four is the minute men which is a come back to the real life minute men who saved the American resistance from the Reds a.k.a. the British
@@IForgotMyUsername5000 the American Revolution was literally hundreds of years ago in real time. Maybe it was iconic in the 1800s, but if you actually go there today, it’s just another boring bland city. You’re looking too deep into it. New York City or LA is much more iconic these days, especially globally.
@@sparkagua It literally does not effect the game at all if the location is iconic, the original fallout game’s locations were 90% not iconic areas. Also I don’t know if you’ve ever been to Boston but it is a lot more interesting than a place like LA it has character and style, all these thing fallout 4 uses to its advantage. The fallout franchise thrives on using history to really define its setting and Boston is rich with it. Not to mention who the hell thinks that the revolutionary war is culturally significant anymore, if it didn’t happen our country wouldn’t even exist.
@@IForgotMyUsername5000 That’s a big shift in argument to what I was responding to lmao you went from “I don’t understand how Boston isn’t iconic” to “it literally doesn’t matter if it’s iconic” because, as you are again pointing out, it’s not iconic. Culturally significant because it’s the foundation of this country? Lol, as an American you can go ahead and claim that, but that’s really painting a false narrative on a broader scale. You ask anyone outside of the US about our culture, they say New York, Washington DC, LA, Las Vegas. No one knows Boston, man. Same way we Americans only recognize current capital cities of other nations (if even that, given the ignorance of some people), cultural significance means something entirely different today than where the first city of the nation was established. Hate to rain on your parade but that’s just the truth of the matter.
No Boston is more iconic than others its older one of the first colonies I know today it's not a big deal but in history it's far more set in America than most others. But yeah it could have been better but most missed the underlying thing Boston one of the original areas of civilization is were we where able to rebuild. I personally got hooked still do on the ability to build into the world.
I think Florida because there we could see new mutated monsters and creatures but I also think Soviet Russia because of the thought of a nuclear winter would be interesting
I loved the settlement building in Fallout 4. Some improvements they could make to it: 1. Obviously make the interface easier to use 2. Settlements are capture points that can be won or lost. They have strategic value so keeping them defended is in your interest. 3. Hostile raider settlements will constantly plot attacks until they are taken out. Give the raiders some AI to their strategy 4. You can set governors and automatic equipment settings. For example you can throw a pile of armour and guns into a workbench anywhere and set a governor to ensure the equipment goes to the settler who needs it most. Your merchant caravans will distribute the goods and settler will automatically upgrade themselves. Or you can set a specific weapon ratio ie each settlement gets at least 5 automatic weapons and one rocket launcher etc. You should only collect limited XP from exploring and side quests. The main story needs to be challenging.
I think Bethesda needs to take a hint from BioWare and write an epic main story as even the new consoles can handle more things happening on the screen now. After becoming a commander for one of many factions at about middle of the game, during assaulting other factions or defending against hordes of enemies, instead of kicking butt you lose everything during the mayhem but maybe one companion who reacues you and drags you to a hideout where unforeseen ally gives you an option for (stealth) infiltrate enemy stronghold by becoming a rookie who starts a long road of both going up in their ranks while sabotaging enemy at the same time... Or (speech) recruit the enemy soldier (sexy female companion of course) and start building up rebel forces all around the world... Or whatever else comes to mind as long as the main guest would have replayability for different playstyles while also having multiple endings for the game. There is no reason why this could not be done with an open world and side quests. Some side quests should also have an effect to the main story line. Just an idea after more than 1k hours in all Fallouts... 😊
Damn, thats a wild idea. I would definitely like to see a more attention payed to story in a fallout title. Just curious: would you want a voiced protagonist to return?
@@holdstartyt Well, voiced protagonist is more immersive when following the storyline as it is but when mods come into play then not having a voice for those is kinda meh. Sooo... yes and no. Well, as long as dialogue audio is somehow easy to extract from the game, then modders can make it work in a simplified manner at least.
@@Boushin good point in the mod aspect, I didn't even consider that. But I agree, a voiced protagonist will help immensely for immersion and to achieve a more compelling narrative
I think San Francisco be good for fallout 5 but I think it must take place after fallout 2 and short period of fallout 4 when Kellogg leaves San Francisco but I think it be fun to explore some of fallout 2 San Francisco ruins and how the brotherhood affect San Francisco but during fallout 4 time you could hear Kellogg mention the ncr in one his brain memories and outside you could see the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge that letting me know the ncr is in control of San Francisco and it a evolve city with government like las Vegas the ncr could have strong weaponry with vertibirds and the trucks we see in long 15 and maybe a few tanks but I believe that be too overpowered so maybe it just for show or could be used in a mission and also we could explore the Alcatraz island we could see and also we could explore Kellogg old apartment. But my only problem is it that the developers going need to make the map bigger for enemy’s bases and tough enemies with power armor I know that the brotherhood hates the ncr and it been so many years that they might try to have a war with the ncr and I know the enclave it not fully destroy and they still around in all 50 states that they might show up again and might interfere with San Francisco! But my only problem is how will Bethesda make a main and playable character with all that happening or my second idea is to go way back in time when the new and improve San Francisco was being built after the bombs fell! But that just could lead to a lot of lore issues in my opinion but one of the options are worth a shot! Update>.1 San Francisco has so much crimes in it city in real life that I think it be a reference in the San Francisco version of Fallout universe and ncr are police that will control the crimes inside the city and you can get involved with crimes or help the ncr in stopping crimes also I believe a player could have a role inside the city on the actions of what he/she done! It be a amazing to have opportunities inside a evolve city in a fallout game!
@@holdstartyt welp thank you I been studying fallout lore in 2014 when I was 10 and my first fallout was fallout 3 so I began starting my adventure there and I got fallout new Vegas and play that and then after I complete 3 and NV and then like one year later fallout 4 came out and I fell in love with that game and I learned a lot more about the fallout universe when the years goes by and also I was learning real life history and geography I am kinda thinking of becoming a lore writer in the future. But for now I still gotta do school and other things to get to my goal! I gotta said I enjoyed the fallout community so much! Everybody got knowledge they wanna share while playing the game or a modder that wanna share their creativity to the whole fallout fan base! It all depends on the person tho!
It's just gonna be NCR Country though huh! I m an they had a standing army occupying another State in New Vegas so I'm assuming San Fran is doing alright! Would be cool to see the Golden Gate Bridge though a beautiful piece of engineering and all those hills with Death Claws hiding behind Lol
I'd like to see New York visited in series...I read that New York was an alternate choice of the setting of fallout 4, but bethesda chose Boston instead...they do have the design document for New York stored, it's possible that a future fallout game might be set in NY...exploring the ruins of New York might be interesting. We will have to wait and see.
I'm always nervous about a game set in NYC, especially if it's an alternate universe like Fallout because, what do you do about 9/11? Say it happened and put in the memorial or say it didn't happen in this universe and put the WTC? Either way, you run the risk of triggering survivors and relatives of the dead if you do....
Hello, Wastelanders.... This is for Everyone, Yes, Even You ( Hold Start ), I'm writing Fallout 5, I will have The full Story complete by November of 2022, I'm doing this completely solo, I cant leak very many details, or what would be the point in buying the game, So... I'm constantly viewing All fans of Fallout, taking thier wants n likes to make A Fallout Game, That becomes The New Favorite Fallout, for Everyone....if that's truly possible.... but... I believe making some changes, how shops work, or adding shops, in game, where you can Actually buy, the different Themes, of building materials..would be A Great plus... instead of walking up and killing things, to take over settlements, you do missions, or quests.. for ones who might live there, as Fallout 4 did... but... instead of a small area, you'll have A small town, with properties you can buy, Once owned... then you can build to your liking in the boundries of that one property... So all building Materials of A Shipment, is all different themes, after buying the shipments needed, The game adds These to your workshop randomly every few days, so you dont have to keep running to purchase them over n over... sort of A cheat.. but practical... considering they could be getting delivered while your away, doing other things..so to me this makes sense... hidden player homes, all over the map... with hidden Build themes, once you find A new theme the shop now has it for you to purchase aswell.. but those are just a few things I'd like to share... I believe This would be A upgrade to Fallout 5... let me know what you all think, Thank You, & True Follower Out !!!!!
It could take place during Christmas time and you can make a Santa power armor with a tank sled guided by Deathclaws and the one at the front has a red nose
Honestly, Fallout 4 was my favorite fallout game, yeah Fallout 3 and New Vegas were good, but there were also things about Fallout 4 that I didnt like, I feel like they should pull the best things from every Fallout game that made them good, and if they are able to get it right, I think Fallout 5 would benefit from a multiplayer mode, not a whole server like Fallout 76 but just 2 players, I mean there are multiplayer mods for every fallout game now, people obviously want multiplayer.
I think having multiple options for your characters background would be even better than JUST being a vault dweller, or a courier. There's a mod for fallout 3 that does this. It lets you pick between multiple backgrounds and starts you in different locations with different gear based on what you pick. It wasn't very well integrated into the story, but if Bethesda focused on working in multiple start locations and questlines that blend well and have good story progression I think it would be awesome to be able to pick between Vault dweller, raider, ghoul, Brotherhood of Steel, wastelander, slave, ECT. Skyrim actually had a mod also that did this very well but again, there needs to be more story behind the different options.
I think Cyberpunk 2077 was going in the right direction if it had more of an impact with the 3 starting storylines. Only fell flat because all 3 ended up in the same spot at some point but I think it was a generally good move even if the game was somewhat lackluster
Dragon Age Origins - but in Fallout? Hm...would on the one hand be nice, but frankly I like the blank slates (without voice acting! The PC doesn't need that and neither is that damn simplified dialogue wheel needed, get rid of both, please!), as they allow you to play anything...a fixed background makes it way harder :(
I was watching a similar video on another channel, and they describe it pretty well in my opinion. There isn’t a single city in the United States that is so recognizable and rich and history than Washington D.C. Not only for citizens of the United States who know the deep roots and meaning, but to the foreigners who live in other countries, they too at least know the significance of Washington D.C. to the United States. Basically, there will never be another well known city that has the history and connections to the country, the game and it’s patriotic, capitalistic ways. Boston was indeed a great location, but to many who don’t know the historical significance of the city, which many don’t because Boston is not a particularly visited or well known city as a city like Washington D.C... it lacked the values and connection that D.C. had. There are plenty of great places a Fallout game could take place in America, don’t get me wrong. However known of them will be as valuable as D.C. Some places I would like to see Fallout 5 could be Chicago, with an underground crime syndicate / mafia / triggerman stuff. Also, we do have to remember that Canada was annexed by the United States in the Fallout alternate history, so technically a Fallout game could take place in Toronto and it would still be in America... Just my thoughts. I’m very excited for the next installment. Also, your content is amazing. I watched this entire video believing it to be a popular channel because of the quality and turns out I was only your 216th subscriber. Keep up the good work, I’ll watch more videos for sure!
Boston is a very important state in us history, and actually has tons of cool folklore that fo4 didn't really capitalize on it. I dunno why but it irks me when someone not from America says "eh this state isn't important" obviously no hate this is a great video, just seems kinda weird to me.
You explained yourself though, "in us history" is the key point. US history is so short compared to the history of most other places in other countries that they'd never pay attention to it. From a foreign perspective it has no export value, every country has places with local significance, the mistake was making a global franchise focus on one of those. I'm not going to bother going out of my way to learn what makes Boston significant and unique in a country I'll never visit. That's why Washington DC and Vegas worked well, they have icon value abroad too that isn't inherently tied to their country of origin. Especially when you take into account Europe and Asia have singular buildings older than the US is as a country, it quickly gets drowned out to the point there's no reason to care. And its greatest call to fame is something that most people just attribute to the country as a whole, so even when focused on by the game it feels more like a generic American aspect that could be done anywhere without any sense of loss. I'm sure Boston resonated really well with American's but it was just Generic City A for most gamers abroad.
@@Robinxen very well put together comment. As an American I agree. Not everyone studies american history especially not that far back. Give everyone something. New Orleans, Miami, even New York would be a better setting than Boston.
The problem wasn't Boston. The problem was the implementation of Boston. For example, Faneuil Hall in the real world is an iconic landmark, separated by a plaza and kind of stands by itself. In FO4 it is just dwarfed by other buildings RIGHT on either side, making the building look small and run down. Where's the aquarium or even the pier? Union Oyster House (would have been damn funny if it were somehow operating)? In an effort to try to capture Boston's narrow and twisting streets, they forgot to capture the iconic landmarks in such a way to make the player go "wow". They were just all run-down shitty versions instead of reimagined decent ones with the possible exception of Fenway. They made Boston dull and brown. Boston is cold and known for fall and winter - so what do we get from the FO4 team? No snow and no fall colors. Go download a Winter Mod or Seasons and the environment changes dramatically for the better. In short, the devs dropped the ball on Boston. For FO5, I'd love to see NY or SF (LA was FO1) or Seattle or even a city like London or Paris. But whatever it is, they need to make the world attractively run down and not just a shitstain, especially if it's 200+ years after the bombs dropped.
A strategy game. Many PC games have true strategic games. Fallout 5 could take Fallout 4 to that level. Can be set anywhere geographically but use the settlement building options to build defensive camps, with "settlers" turned into militia groups who the player can send out on attacks. Ultimately there is a common threat, say a huge Super Mutant Army building up and ready to attack "the world." So, part of the strategy of the game would be to rally allies. Maybe the player has to make contact with raiders and gunners and win them over to work with you and your militia settlements against a common enemy, the Mutant Army. How you build your armed camps, deploy troops, and plan to take on and defeat this invading Mutant Army is the strategy the player chooses and employs. And! make it possible to lose. Yes, maybe the Mutants want to fight their way across "the world" and get into a vault where they capture a secret weapon. If they do, you lose and can start over and play again. Each time you play it, you can try different methods and engage in different strategies. Fallout 4 is my single favorite video game. I am playing through start to finish a third time, choosing to play it different each time. I have not bought Fallout 76 because of all the negativity surrounding it. Maybe I will if 76 can be an enjoyable single-player experience. Have no interest whatsoever in online, multi-player play. Video games are an escape time for me, I want to be alone and want to enjoy the games at my own pace and when I want to play. I hope Fallout 5 takes the best of 4 and it is an awesome game.
My guess is they will go somewhere that really hasn't been explored in the Fallout series yet, so far we have seen the West Coast and Nevada, the mid-Atlantic region (Boston, Washington and West Virginia), I'd put money on something like Southern Florida (Miami) or the Midwest (Chicago). Though, I suppose it's still possible that since the other Bethesda releases were on the mid Atlantic east coast, they could do something like New York or Philadelphia to keep factions like the Institute and the DC based Brotherhood in play.
Yeah my first thought was Florida. New York would be just another city with skyscrappers and a grid layout. Florida gives the neon city of Miami, the swamps of the everglades, Cape Canaveral, Disney World, old Spanish heritage, the Florida Keys. The look would be a lot different from what we've seen so far.
When I was playing Fallout 76 I had so much fun going on my immortal quest of finding a musket. Exploring the ruins of civil war battles and armories and all locations in between.
I disagree with what you said about the story, about how it wasn't one of the most vital aspects of the franchise. I've always enjoyed delving into the storyline and lore.
I think you might change your opinion about Boston as a “lackluster” location if you took a more historically informed perspective. New England is the birthplace of this nation. Revolutionary War? Ring a bell?
See as a Brit I kind of value Boston as a City its history etc! .....and having known quite a few Irish Lads alongside Chicago its important because the amount of Irish Lads and Lasses or those of descent who inhabit the City! Plus don't get baseball it's Rounders with Advertising but if I was to follow a team it'd probably be Red Sox as a outsider Boston and Baseball are just two things I put together Lol
I am not even American and I agree it was a perfect location. History has a powerful impact, especially when it is the cradle of the US’s great civilization. And the universe of Fallout needs to be set in America, their satire and criticism demands it
Went on a road trip recently and went through DC, philly, NYC, and Boston and Boston was my favorite city out of all of those even New York City so I personally think it’s slept on as a fallout setting
Yes, the only thing Fallout lack is winter biomes. Detroit would be a great next Fallout location. Hunting deers, bears, trying to stay warm to survive in winter (yes, a season system has to be implemented).
I'd like an added aspect to that for maybe a more difficult survival setting where you have to store some farmed food for the winter, maybe even with the need of preservation
@@MrDosonhai yeah I've always wanted more of a struggle to the settlement system and wanted a more homesteady feel to things(I'm more of a builder instead of a fighter). But an option to disable or lessen the difficulty of this could also make the warmongerers happy
I think you just said what we're all thinking you're really good at making these videos thank you for bringing back hope for fallout I know it's 2022 and this video was made a year 1 ago
We're waiting for Starfield, followed by the next Elder Scrolls, before the next Fallout which means we have about another 7 years still. I think Fallout 76 will be doing just fine.
I want pipboy choice, imagine having the choice of PipBoy2000 : VATS doesnt stop time PipBoy3000 : VATS slows time PipBoy3500 : VATS Stops time And imagine choosing which Vault you come from based on the type of PipBoy you pick
My personal wishlist is for fallout 5 to have a voiced protagonist but give the option for "classic" gameplay which muted the character, a new engine which will probably happen by the time it's out, and co-op but not multiplayer. One extra person could serve the role of a companion but still give it the same experience as a single player world. Making it a multiplayer game ruins the feel of the game because everything respawns and resets to how it was without you but that wouldn't happen with co op
My Pitch for a Fallout 5 would take place in San Francisco. “But what about the older games?” well, it’s been a while, and I’d say 10 years or so after New Vegas’s plot line so the BoS or the NCRs role could be very different with the time passed. Anyways, already with San Fran being iconic (bridge and all) it would also be a great place environmentally for fallout. They could have parts of the map be desert, forest, city, ocean, mountains, a bunch of stuff depending on how big they want to make it. California has always been a great place for Fallout games with all the diverse landscapes. We could also be Introduced to a bunch of cool new factions. Like maybes there’s a new rival, akin to Caesers legion, but from up north. Or maybe the NCR had a civil war and broke into like three different sub-factions, and one could be NCR remnants and the other could be named a new faction. (The Mormon-ites?) They could also play around with parts of San Fran being underwater, like half the city is sunk because of tectonic plates/nuclear warfare and it could incorporate new ways of travel like having to use boats, and go through parts of San Fran (that arnt half submerged) like Venice. these are just some dumb ideas I came up with on the spot, I’m sure way more talented people at best heads/obsidian could make something really cool.
San Francisco when Kellogg was a mercenary there would be a perfect tie-in to Fallout 4, too. It could even take place before Black Isle Studio's Fallout 2 and make the Enclave the primary bad guys. Perhaps we could meet Harrigan before the Enclave made him into an abomination. We could be in the aftermath of the destruction of the Master and his supermutant army from Fallout 1. Lots of places to go in a Fallout: San Francisco
Damn I Was Watching You’re Video’s And Thought You Where A Big Channel But I Just Realized You Only Have 166 Subscribers And You’re Pushing Out Content This Quality That Looks Like Content From Someone With A Couple Hundred Thousand Maybe A Even Million Subscribers You Just Got A Sub From Me Bro!
Big things coming your way. The quality of this content is way too high for you to not experience massive growth. I won’t forget I was here before you were famous lol
My dream fallout is having the whole country as the map. And then they can re introduce all the factions that they had in all the past games. And ofc introduce new ones.
I think it would be cooler if instead of coming out of a vault it would a place hundreds of years after where the world it built up more and the wasteland starts building bigger city's like maybe include new Francisco then there could be a cool return of the NCR back into the story
Texas would be cool, between Houston, San Antonio, and DFW, you got a lot to work with city wise, as well as iconic locations (Stockyards in FW, Alamo in SA)
Actually, I can see why they picked Boston and the majority of Massachusetts; key centre of many events throughout the American Revolution which is something I, as a Brit, knew very little about other than "It happened and we lost" and "Sometimes, I think the US would have been better off if WE'D won the War of Independence..." (I mean, you guys certainly wouldn't have had Presidents like Nixon, Regan and Trump, that's for sure...) because the British Education System doesn't seem to think our part in that is worth bringing up in History Class, so leave FO4 alone,please..
It would be dope to Set a fallout game in Colorado, We have a lot of stuff out here that could be interesting for a fallout game. Especially if you consider the potential for the NCR and the other factions being there. Don’t forget, Out here we are also close to New Mexico and Oklahoma and Texas not being far from us along with many other states.
honestly my vote is for nashville....grew up there and would LOVE to see a fallout game take place in the southeast and nashville is the perfect location with its party and music based culture. nashville is the Vegas of the south and all of the creature possibilities would be so cool
fallout 4 was good to me and l still play it . I have over 10000 hours and climbing.... but they still need to fix a lot of that game.... fallout 5 would be cool if it join with fallout 4 or have it in Alaska with a touch of Canada.... thanks for you video it was great..... and I pray that God will keep you and your family safe..... I'm from Canada 😃
There are a ton of cool locations in that area, Heinz, Skagway, White Horse. Not to mention all the small towns. The mountainous environment would be refreshing to explore after Skyrim is no longer the most recent elder scrolls game. And the lore between the invasion of Alaska and the annexation of Canada could be explored much further.
We can always have a fallout that takes places right after the nukes, radiation storms would actually be deadly now, we could even finally introduce cars and vehicles! and for the teams we could have: The army: they're recruiting every possible citizen and are quickly becoming tyrannical but they're attempting to keep raiders at bay.(they could have tanks and vehicles even planes!) The Enclave: They're trying to stop the military and gain complete control and bring back American values (But they consider ghouls a lost cause)(they also could have tanks, vehicles even planes) The Police force: Think of the minuteman but with lacking weapons and they're not strategic at all (ofcourse you change that). and the Yes man could be a relatively new group called the Brotherhood of Steel 😉 who are recruiting people to their cause and push back the corrupt US government (if you help ofcourse) For enemies we could have: Crazy Ghouls: they still look human but they're brains are fried. Classic Ghouls The Gangs/Mafia or classic brutal raiders. Chinese scouts/infiltrators/spies or even Chinese infantry squads that have tanks and vehicles.
I still love Fallout 4 because the location and it's where I've always lived. I even lived in two of the towns. Also like other folks have said the community building is just so much fun.
You my friend deserve more attention. You have earned my subscription and id say this time between fallout games allows us to make the games bethesda gave us better with modding and already the minecraft scene is rapidly catching up! There are mods for minecraft that recreate fallout pretty well I myself am making a fallout/bioshock modpack for minecraft and I can say I'll gladly wait and it gives me time to enjoy starfield :) great video and love the humor.
I have a lot of suggestions. But heres a few: Should have it take place in another country like Japan or something. And take a page from bioware and obsidian on making in depth dialog options. Instead of pick your yes system. And make it so you can circle back around to subjects. Like if there's a charisma check you don't have the level for. Make it so you can leave and get your charisma up then come back to unlock that dialog. Also make it so you can change your characters voice like in DAI both male and female created characters have 2 voice options. Have companions get at least one special move with a cool down like they'll pull out and use a pistol and then go back to using thier equipped weapon you gave them, thier own perks and have 2 max companions come with you like in outer worlds or be like the DA trilogy so you can have cross combos, build your companions to add extra strategy or even play as them and swap back and forth. Also if you have companions make it so it increases a certain Stat with each different one. Like one makes you more stealthy, increases your intelligence, strength or makes hacking easier etc. And get a unique perk with max affinity and after doing a companion quest like in DA1. And have it so diffrent companions open up even more dialog options for diffrent factions or npcs who share the same view points. Make it so you can walk or run through your companion like in outer worlds so no more getting stuck in cramped places. Add vehicles like a vertibird, car, horses, boats or maybe monsters like ride a deathclaw. add in gliders and zip lines. And have more attachments for power armor like mounted turrets, melee weapons, and wrist mounted guns. And be able to put settlers in power armor. have it so you have more control over the factions. Like have hideouts you control in a miny game. And send out people on missions you get in game rewards for. Or send them out to collect stuff. Also have it so you can claim a settlement in game for a faction and have new building objects.
@Anne O'Nymous nah, That'd get old and be boring. Besides There's only a few places in the U.S. for interested locations. Now what would be fun is to jump off the eiffel tower in power armor or fight an army of ghouls on what's left of the great wall of China. That sounds more interesting then say a post apocalyptic New York or Seattle. Also it wouldn't just be the location we'd also get to see what happened to the rest of the world. And if there was another company like vault tech over seas. And we'd see new factions.
Talking about location, I think SOOOO much can be done with New Orleans. The Jazz, the Mafia, the Cajun accent and cuisine, the Alligators, the Sports, FRENCH QUARTER!, the urban city vs the muggy swamps, the Voodoo, the Church, SOOOOOOO MUCH to build off of. New Orleans is about as iconic of a locations Fallout could explore.
Full agreement - hell, they both now belong to Microsoft, right? So take the IP from Badthesda, as they have mismanaged it ever since acquiring it! NV was the only bright spot during that long darkness! Give it to Obsidian, give them 4 years to make a game (with the option of adding a year, if they truly need it)...oh and SCRAP THE ENGINE! Left over from Morrowind (at least partially), that is too old!
England, London would make an epic Fallout. Houses of Parliament, Buckingham Palace, Millennium Wheel, Trafalgar Square, The Thames, wrecked out Routemasters and dodgy underpass tunnels leading you under a train track. If it had the grungy greyish wash to it that Fallout 3 did, I would be so excited to play that.
Hm...no military bases there (at best you'd find police station and as British cops aren't armed, there's not many guns around...so probably not really fun -.-)
I think that an ideal location for a Fallout 5 would be New York (State and City), it's a well known city in the United States, and it doesn't go too far from the "specialness" of where the Fallout franchise takes place. It's also near Boston, so maybe the next Fallout would be tied to Fallout 4 somebow? And since New York has the Yankees and Boston has the Red Sox, it would only make sense for a Fallout New York to have baseball references in it too. I also see it possible that the next Fallout game would be a multiplayer game (which we all know is a greate mistake) but would also have a singleplayer option for if a player wants to play it alone, as a lone wanderer. Just my guess though, not really going to happen, I already know, but it's possible that Bethesda and Microsoft are thinking about it now
Sam Francisco and Los Angeles were already covered in Fallout 1 & 2, Kansas and Illinois were covered in Fallout Tactics but those games aren’t well liked. The big candidates I can think of would be Florida, Texas, or New York State. But hopefully in the new Fallout they give new monsters related to the location, such as mutant alligators if it’s in Florida, or Armadillos if it’s Texas
Settlement building but not restricted to specific areas but the ability to build wherever we want. Also less boarded up houses and more buildings to explore. Important landmarks that also exist irl and more truly unique and legendary weapons not just legendary effects on random variations.
I think having optional co-op could be fun. Like you’re going around the wasteland doing good and your friend’s doing bad things or you’re both collecting junk to scrap.
maybe when your friend joins a group and you different group which has oppesite ideals you could try to mess up whatever your friend does and vice versa or join the same group and do what you can todo everything ASAP
@@KDDTHNDR it could be fun and you could mislead your friend you're doing something else while doing a mission of the group oppesite them after they completed a mission which their group wanted
That was amazing I am subscribing for that speech I grew playing the Bethesda games, New Vegas Fallout 4, Fallout 3 and I think took the wrong turn when fallout 76 came out. I think you made some very valid arguments of where the game is I rlly like the Detroit one and Texas I can imagine a game like that you explained perfectly how I would what the game to be. Thank you.
Look, have an optional co-op system in 5, emphasis on optional. As opposed to what 76 did. Pair it with the building system but integrate that into every joinable faction in a functional way and have the ability to create you're own with a heavy emphasis on RP. For instance, imagine a minutemen but evil and as cutthroat as the raiders from nuka-world as determined by you and being able to complete the game as such(plus elimination of Garvy), with the ability to either bring other factions under your control as well as diamond city and determine the lifestyle of its citizens. You could recruit into your faction, having a system to determine the creation of an army and its units and equipment which can be built up over time. Or have a dynamic world where that could happen without your input or knowledge and you could be forced to face such a faction as it vies for control after it builds itself up. One day you could just be minding your own business buying some booze when suddenly the minutemen occupy the town or city your in and demands the citizens submit(including you) to their authority at gun point, and you can or you can attempt to escape depending upon where you're located in the city, or you can initiate a resistance. Another element I would like is the ability to completely wipe out a faction from a location permanently then have the ability to alter that environment. For instance, you can wipe the gunners out completely across the commonwealth then take over their old bases with your faction, and maybe every now and then or have a player trigger to instigate that faction into attempting to take back that location from you, and if they do and they go onto recapture all their old bases, perhaps they'll come after your land and attempt to wipe you out, this would give the player an incentive to align with other factions in the early stages. Maybe the other co-op players can join different factions and you can war with each other, that would be really fun. Sadly you just can't specifically do that with 76.
I like the co op in 76 but don’t think theres enough, you should be able to progress through the story with other players and you can’t do that in 76 due to privatized interiors.
Wow, someone with the same views and location choices. Detroit would be a prime location: rich history (especially 50's theme), manufacturing hub that would serve as a good introduction to vehicles, ambassador bridge to canada. Florida would also be great, especially the space coast, could have dlc in miami, the keys, and orlando.
My idea on how Boston IS a big symbol of Fallout's America is it's importance in the very beginning of America. The start of the revolution started near Boston, and it's still an important location after the fall of America.
Need to stop with this online BS and go back to single player stories. Or maybe a co-op mode in which the difficulty of survival goes up. Maybe bring in different modes of survival along with it such as you need to eat and sleep but not have it forced on you more of a choice. I think a return to D.C or maybe going to New York would allow players to have that original feeling again alot of people around the world have heard about both places. New York also has a corrupt past with the mafia and could center itself around a return to form. Just ideas. I just dont want an online game from Bethesda.
Keep it optional! I myself hate survival modes with a passion, I do "maintenance" (eating, sleeping, taking a shower etc.) in RL, so I don't need or want that in my games! As for location: HAWAII! Why? Pearl Harbor for one (major military base!) and the possibility of both giving the player a mobile home (a boat in that case!) and to do Island-Hopping...and maybe a Japan or China DLC!
Its funny because at Bethesda, the focus is on the price/cost probabilities of their product lines and the rate of return in their asset investments. Talk of making a game 'special' is totally fucking alien to them.
When I think of iconic places in America Boston is definitely in my top 3 because of the history behind it, I think the reason people say it doesn’t feel the same is because Bethesda didn’t expand on the history behind it
I’ve seen some concept art of a space shuttle; I would love to see some missions using it to go to the archimedes satellite. Maybe something to do with a hacker that’s taken it over and is using it in an extortion racket?
How about a charecter pre selecter where perks are linked to the charecter but keep the SPECIAL their, be a vault dweller, a wastelander who faound a pipboy, etc it is like telling difrient story from multipal point of view and thsy could converge at some point in time and the karma system as well. Adding keep the power armor function like in falout 4 and 76
Boston makes perfect sense given your logic. D.C. is iconic for what it represents, the US GOVT as it exists. Boston was where the Revolution began. Therefore, it represents what America was envisioned to become versus what it became.
Here me out. This is a bit out of the box but what about Colorado? It has a lot of huge mountains that could be explored and the city of Denver which would be cool to go through. Idk I feel like the mountains would be a huge change that would spice up the series and take it to a new place that isn't really seen all that much in other fallout games.
Ngl I loved the build aspect of 4 because I was able to change the world I was playing in and make it mine. And that whole “rebuilding the wasteland” I was living my mayor fantasy lmao.
Agreed
I know I turned sanctuary into a circus city
I loved it too but if it was more like SIM settlements it wouldve really been well received
Rebuilding? You were able to build slums basically (without modding the settlement system), because the buildings you were able to create all looked like a Favela! It would have been more fun if it had been less clunky (better menus to tell your settlers what to do for example and buildings like an armory to give them decent weapons) and if it allowed you to build relatively cleanly (Shady Sands style or Vault City if you get more invested!)...building shacks is not fun!
@@dreamingflurry2729 it might not be fun to you, but I built a lot before I used mods and I still got a lot of enjoyment out of it. I really like the aesthetic of a hobbled together settlement made by people who don’t know how to build.
My hope is that they expand on the npc's part in the game to make them more believable, with greater range in responses to questions and reputation. The npc's always felt too two dimensional.
I agree one of the biggest problems with bethesda fallout is the fact that everything in the world happens only to you. there is no change at all among the npcs & environment unless the player is the one directly causing it. different from new vegas where it feels like the ncr, legion, and mr house are all making their moves with or without the player's help.
Also companions feel different. You make an impact on your friends you travel with in a horizontal way, not vertically. There is no good or bad choice, it's only what you may think is best and dealing with the consequences.
yeah, I'm going to attack a level 60 guy in X-01 power armor with.... a pool cue!
Unfortunately characters can only be as cunning, endearing & terrifying etc as the people who write them. Those types of people obvs aren't at these studios for the most part.
Fallout 4 didn’t make me remember it because of how good the story or world was, it was because the sheer amount of time I spent just modding it. When I played Fallout 76, it was memorable, because I had to explore more. The world was more lively, and while the decision of no NPCs sucked, it felt more real to me.
I think that was the point of 76. No npcs to represent the lifeless and emptiness of the environments two decades after a nuclear fallout. It gave 76 and West Virginia a depressing atmosphere but in a good way, but I think not alot of people see it that way since they get too lazy to explore places to search for stories, lore etc, and would rather just hear them from npcs
When I played fallout 76 it was memorable as the only time I've ever spent 60 dollars to play a game for 2 hours. I'm planning to go back and try again soon though since there have been alot of updates. Is it actually good now?
@@dragonborn-oq6kj yeah it’s actually pretty good now. It’s still pretty buggy but besides that they have actual npc’s now as well as there being a lot more to do in the game
I think it would be cool to have it on the west coast maybe 10 or 20 years after NV
npcs in NV are always talking about how the ncr are spreading themselves to thin and in the end they do and collapse from the inside
so most ncr are called back to their main city creating a power vacuum allowing for new factions to pop up and fight for the territories that the ncr had to leave behind and the land is plunged into chaos
I agree, I want to see a Bethesda version of the HUB. I feel if they were to expand on the choice makeing mechanics over all and keep the art style of 4 it would make a good game.
@@bobbob-es6zg fallout 1/2 remakes would be good
Legion also probably collapses once Ceasar dies, curious to think how the landscape of the west is now with both likely far weaker than from NV
That would actually be awesome. Imagine having various groups fight for control over a collapsing NCR. Maybe the Enclave will make a return
While there's a part of me that would love to see California, post-New Vegas... There's also part of me that would sort of hate it, since America is a big place and we've already had three of the six "mainline" Fallout games (1, 2, New Vegas) heavily involve it. I want to see how New Orleans is in the Fallout universe, I want to see Chicago (and how much of Tactics is canon), I'd love to see my home city of Detroit, or the twin cities; Minneapolis and St. Paul. Seattle could be cool, too, with some nifty rad weather.
If fallout 5 has multiplayer, make the game 2 player co-op or allowing players to have 2 companion followers at a time
Co-Op and Online Multiplayer,
Would be epic to travel the wasteland with a buddy or 3
thats really a good idea
If it was integrated well I'd love it. Fallout 76 in my opinion fell through because it was meant to be an mmo, not a fallout game.
@@ashirii8347 Wouldn't that kind of ruin the RPG? What if you disagree about how to proceed (extreme example, say Fallout NV had this and your friend likes the Legion, which you want to shoot on sight and want to side with House!), you can't have the same world-state (unless only the host controls the story?)
No online if they do the game will be less so no go play Fortnite or some crap like that if you want multiplayer.
I love having the camp from fallout 76, being able to pick almost anywhere where you want to build. In fallout 4 I liked building an empire through settlements and supply lines, so I hope Fallout 5 will have both a camp and settlement system. Also I would like to add the building of robots from fallout 4 dlc into fallout 5.
As long as the building system is still optional (some PC-Characters might not care at all about settling anything and neither do some players), less clunky (damned sometimes you had to fight the system to get something the way you wanted it and hell, you couldn't even manage your settlers directly via a menu!) and as long as it allows clean building (I hate building something that looks like it is straight out of Mad Max...or a Favela in RL! I would have loved to kind of build Shady Sands or Vault City, not rusty shacks!)
The supply lines was a great idea for settlements but I think f4 had too many settlements to look after. If you could create supply lines with settlements that aren't yours be cool
What I want to see in fallout 5, is an ending selection, whatever ending you chose for fallout 4, that could be cool
Though that can get muddled a bit, since it's also the "How did you see yourself in these positions?" I would've tried to go for an "Time to implement the institute into the wasteland and actually try to rebuild the commonwealth."
Because The Institute, had cures for most illness, had advanced sciences... I would probably figure out an way for prosthetics (like the concept art) and/or use Gen 2 synth parts for prosthetics, if people prefer robotic limbs over the near-human looking ones.
@@wolfenrichtophen6010 That is my head-canon, blowing up the Institute? Such a waste! Especially if you side the with fascists (BoS! Maxson is a racist fascist who deserves a bullet to the head! This entitled little boy should never have been given leadership!)...not that 'Save the Toasters' is much better and hell, 'Weak Sauce' (the Minutemen...who are nothing without the player and the weakest faction over all! They don't have power armor unless you give them your's, they only use shoddy weapons, they don't even wear military armor (like say the Gunners!)) is even worse! Hell, the only faction that gets stuff done without the player, is the Institute!
@@dreamingflurry2729 Well, if the game took longer to release, we know that there was going to be 13 something pipe gun variants, an mercenary group with jetpacks, minuteman laser cannons.. And a way to make the laser musket more viable, possibly plasma.
Same for the endings of New Vegas if this is done. I'll take any reference to the Mojave I could get. Also, if it were to be an NCR or Legion ending they'll likely be in the East by the time Fallout 5 takes place
@@dreamingflurry2729 I could argue that the BOS does patrol and kill off super mutants ghouls etc
Boston is actually a really cool place personally I’m never been there but the one of the main factions in fallout four is the minute men which is a come back to the real life minute men who saved the American resistance from the Reds a.k.a. the British
I don’t understand why he doesn’t think Boston is iconic… it’s literally where the American revolution started.
@@IForgotMyUsername5000 i agree
@@IForgotMyUsername5000 the American Revolution was literally hundreds of years ago in real time. Maybe it was iconic in the 1800s, but if you actually go there today, it’s just another boring bland city. You’re looking too deep into it. New York City or LA is much more iconic these days, especially globally.
@@sparkagua It literally does not effect the game at all if the location is iconic, the original fallout game’s locations were 90% not iconic areas. Also I don’t know if you’ve ever been to Boston but it is a lot more interesting than a place like LA it has character and style, all these thing fallout 4 uses to its advantage. The fallout franchise thrives on using history to really define its setting and Boston is rich with it. Not to mention who the hell thinks that the revolutionary war is culturally significant anymore, if it didn’t happen our country wouldn’t even exist.
@@IForgotMyUsername5000 That’s a big shift in argument to what I was responding to lmao you went from “I don’t understand how Boston isn’t iconic” to “it literally doesn’t matter if it’s iconic” because, as you are again pointing out, it’s not iconic. Culturally significant because it’s the foundation of this country? Lol, as an American you can go ahead and claim that, but that’s really painting a false narrative on a broader scale. You ask anyone outside of the US about our culture, they say New York, Washington DC, LA, Las Vegas. No one knows Boston, man. Same way we Americans only recognize current capital cities of other nations (if even that, given the ignorance of some people), cultural significance means something entirely different today than where the first city of the nation was established. Hate to rain on your parade but that’s just the truth of the matter.
Do you agree with my thoughts?
No Boston is more iconic than others its older one of the first colonies I know today it's not a big deal but in history it's far more set in America than most others. But yeah it could have been better but most missed the underlying thing Boston one of the original areas of civilization is were we where able to rebuild. I personally got hooked still do on the ability to build into the world.
I think Florida because there we could see new mutated monsters and creatures but I also think Soviet Russia because of the thought of a nuclear winter would be interesting
@@goodcontentdog4746 that's just metro
@@clements8641 oh right
Ye but what about europe
I loved the settlement building in Fallout 4. Some improvements they could make to it:
1. Obviously make the interface easier to use
2. Settlements are capture points that can be won or lost. They have strategic value so keeping them defended is in your interest.
3. Hostile raider settlements will constantly plot attacks until they are taken out. Give the raiders some AI to their strategy
4. You can set governors and automatic equipment settings. For example you can throw a pile of armour and guns into a workbench anywhere and set a governor to ensure the equipment goes to the settler who needs it most. Your merchant caravans will distribute the goods and settler will automatically upgrade themselves. Or you can set a specific weapon ratio ie each settlement gets at least 5 automatic weapons and one rocket launcher etc.
You should only collect limited XP from exploring and side quests. The main story needs to be challenging.
I think Bethesda needs to take a hint from BioWare and write an epic main story as even the new consoles can handle more things happening on the screen now.
After becoming a commander for one of many factions at about middle of the game, during assaulting other factions or defending against hordes of enemies, instead of kicking butt you lose everything during the mayhem but maybe one companion who reacues you and drags you to a hideout where unforeseen ally gives you an option for (stealth) infiltrate enemy stronghold by becoming a rookie who starts a long road of both going up in their ranks while sabotaging enemy at the same time... Or (speech) recruit the enemy soldier (sexy female companion of course) and start building up rebel forces all around the world... Or whatever else comes to mind as long as the main guest would have replayability for different playstyles while also having multiple endings for the game. There is no reason why this could not be done with an open world and side quests. Some side quests should also have an effect to the main story line.
Just an idea after more than 1k hours in all Fallouts... 😊
Damn, thats a wild idea. I would definitely like to see a more attention payed to story in a fallout title.
Just curious: would you want a voiced protagonist to return?
@@holdstartyt Well, voiced protagonist is more immersive when following the storyline as it is but when mods come into play then not having a voice for those is kinda meh. Sooo... yes and no. Well, as long as dialogue audio is somehow easy to extract from the game, then modders can make it work in a simplified manner at least.
@@Boushin good point in the mod aspect, I didn't even consider that. But I agree, a voiced protagonist will help immensely for immersion and to achieve a more compelling narrative
I think San Francisco be good for fallout 5 but I think it must take place after fallout 2 and short period of fallout 4 when Kellogg leaves San Francisco but I think it be fun to explore some of fallout 2 San Francisco ruins and how the brotherhood affect San Francisco but during fallout 4 time you could hear Kellogg mention the ncr in one his brain memories and outside you could see the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge that letting me know the ncr is in control of San Francisco and it a evolve city with government like las Vegas the ncr could have strong weaponry with vertibirds and the trucks we see in long 15 and maybe a few tanks but I believe that be too overpowered so maybe it just for show or could be used in a mission and also we could explore the Alcatraz island we could see and also we could explore Kellogg old apartment. But my only problem is it that the developers going need to make the map bigger for enemy’s bases and tough enemies with power armor I know that the brotherhood hates the ncr and it been so many years that they might try to have a war with the ncr and I know the enclave it not fully destroy and they still around in all 50 states that they might show up again and might interfere with San Francisco! But my only problem is how will Bethesda make a main and playable character with all that happening or my second idea is to go way back in time when the new and improve San Francisco was being built after the bombs fell! But that just could lead to a lot of lore issues in my opinion but one of the options are worth a shot!
Update>.1
San Francisco has so much crimes in it city in real life that I think it be a reference in the San Francisco version of Fallout universe and ncr are police that will control the crimes inside the city and you can get involved with crimes or help the ncr in stopping crimes also I believe a player could have a role inside the city on the actions of what he/she done! It be a amazing to have opportunities inside a evolve city in a fallout game!
Great input! I love the alcatraz idea! As well as the corrupt authority angle. Thanks for sharing!
@@holdstartyt welp thank you I been studying fallout lore in 2014 when I was 10 and my first fallout was fallout 3 so I began starting my adventure there and I got fallout new Vegas and play that and then after I complete 3 and NV and then like one year later fallout 4 came out and I fell in love with that game and I learned a lot more about the fallout universe when the years goes by and also I was learning real life history and geography I am kinda thinking of becoming a lore writer in the future. But for now I still gotta do school and other things to get to my goal! I gotta said I enjoyed the fallout community so much! Everybody got knowledge they wanna share while playing the game or a modder that wanna share their creativity to the whole fallout fan base! It all depends on the person tho!
@@raymond258rj3 pursue writing. Its very rewarding. I just published my first book in september
Or I mean can we just get remakes of the fallout before 3, it would be a lovely break and Bethesda, only needs to put it in a few new ideas.
It's just gonna be NCR Country though huh! I m an they had a standing army occupying another State in New Vegas so I'm assuming San Fran is doing alright! Would be cool to see the Golden Gate Bridge though a beautiful piece of engineering and all those hills with Death Claws hiding behind Lol
I'd like to see New York visited in series...I read that New York was an alternate choice of the setting of fallout 4, but bethesda chose Boston instead...they do have the design document for New York stored, it's possible that a future fallout game might be set in NY...exploring the ruins of New York might be interesting. We will have to wait and see.
I'm always nervous about a game set in NYC, especially if it's an alternate universe like Fallout because, what do you do about 9/11? Say it happened and put in the memorial or say it didn't happen in this universe and put the WTC?
Either way, you run the risk of triggering survivors and relatives of the dead if you do....
@@flashstudiosguy well it's an alternate timeline so it doesn't really NEED to happen
@@flashstudiosguy well in universe they didn’t even start construction before the diversion of timelines
Canada for me. Hell if I’m really reaching for the stars put in Seth Rogan as a wisecracking Canadian ghoul companion. A gamer can dream can he?
@@Swordslinger-hb1ns "No, I'd rather watch an R rated Animated Christmas comedy with just a touch of a feminist agenda"
This video was honestly amazing. I really hope Bethesda sees it
Damn its like your giving a beautiful speech
Fallout 3's random encounter system is phenomenal, no two games of fallout 3 are ever the same and I'm still discovering new things about this game
Raul in fallout new vegas actually says that mr. House shot down a lot of nukes during the great war
Going to vegas only and even then he missed a few due to outdated software not having the chip
Hello, Wastelanders.... This is for Everyone, Yes, Even You ( Hold Start ), I'm writing Fallout 5, I will have The full Story complete by November of 2022, I'm doing this completely solo, I cant leak very many details, or what would be the point in buying the game, So... I'm constantly viewing All fans of Fallout, taking thier wants n likes to make A Fallout Game, That becomes The New Favorite Fallout, for Everyone....if that's truly possible.... but... I believe making some changes, how shops work, or adding shops, in game, where you can Actually buy, the different Themes, of building materials..would be A Great plus... instead of walking up and killing things, to take over settlements, you do missions, or quests.. for ones who might live there, as Fallout 4 did... but... instead of a small area, you'll have A small town, with properties you can buy, Once owned... then you can build to your liking in the boundries of that one property... So all building Materials of A Shipment, is all different themes, after buying the shipments needed, The game adds These to your workshop randomly every few days, so you dont have to keep running to purchase them over n over... sort of A cheat.. but practical... considering they could be getting delivered while your away, doing other things..so to me this makes sense... hidden player homes, all over the map... with hidden Build themes, once you find A new theme the shop now has it for you to purchase aswell.. but those are just a few things I'd like to share... I believe This would be A upgrade to Fallout 5... let me know what you all think, Thank You, & True Follower Out !!!!!
Keep up the hard work bro🙏🏾🙏🏾💯
I hope this channel takes off man!
Me too, man lol!
I once thought of a concept for a Minnesota based fallout called Fallout: North Star. It’ll never happen but it made me happy as a Minnesotan. :)
It could take place during Christmas time and you can make a Santa power armor with a tank sled guided by Deathclaws and the one at the front has a red nose
Honestly, Fallout 4 was my favorite fallout game, yeah Fallout 3 and New Vegas were good, but there were also things about Fallout 4 that I didnt like, I feel like they should pull the best things from every Fallout game that made them good, and if they are able to get it right, I think Fallout 5 would benefit from a multiplayer mode, not a whole server like Fallout 76 but just 2 players, I mean there are multiplayer mods for every fallout game now, people obviously want multiplayer.
I think having multiple options for your characters background would be even better than JUST being a vault dweller, or a courier. There's a mod for fallout 3 that does this. It lets you pick between multiple backgrounds and starts you in different locations with different gear based on what you pick. It wasn't very well integrated into the story, but if Bethesda focused on working in multiple start locations and questlines that blend well and have good story progression I think it would be awesome to be able to pick between Vault dweller, raider, ghoul, Brotherhood of Steel, wastelander, slave, ECT. Skyrim actually had a mod also that did this very well but again, there needs to be more story behind the different options.
I think Cyberpunk 2077 was going in the right direction if it had more of an impact with the 3 starting storylines. Only fell flat because all 3 ended up in the same spot at some point but I think it was a generally good move even if the game was somewhat lackluster
Dragon Age Origins - but in Fallout? Hm...would on the one hand be nice, but frankly I like the blank slates (without voice acting! The PC doesn't need that and neither is that damn simplified dialogue wheel needed, get rid of both, please!), as they allow you to play anything...a fixed background makes it way harder :(
I was watching a similar video on another channel, and they describe it pretty well in my opinion. There isn’t a single city in the United States that is so recognizable and rich and history than Washington D.C. Not only for citizens of the United States who know the deep roots and meaning, but to the foreigners who live in other countries, they too at least know the significance of Washington D.C. to the United States. Basically, there will never be another well known city that has the history and connections to the country, the game and it’s patriotic, capitalistic ways.
Boston was indeed a great location, but to many who don’t know the historical significance of the city, which many don’t because Boston is not a particularly visited or well known city as a city like Washington D.C... it lacked the values and connection that D.C. had.
There are plenty of great places a Fallout game could take place in America, don’t get me wrong. However known of them will be as valuable as D.C.
Some places I would like to see Fallout 5 could be Chicago, with an underground crime syndicate / mafia / triggerman stuff.
Also, we do have to remember that Canada was annexed by the United States in the Fallout alternate history, so technically a Fallout game could take place in Toronto and it would still be in America...
Just my thoughts. I’m very excited for the next installment.
Also, your content is amazing. I watched this entire video believing it to be a popular channel because of the quality and turns out I was only your 216th subscriber. Keep up the good work, I’ll watch more videos for sure!
Damn this channel is underrated. Btw how is Detroit iconic but Boston isn't? Lol
Because it’s where minorities, such as slaves would cross the border to Canada for freedom
@@danielharries3240 Boston was the centre of the 1775 revolution, far bigger event
Exactly
The Motor City propably.
Boston is a very important state in us history, and actually has tons of cool folklore that fo4 didn't really capitalize on it. I dunno why but it irks me when someone not from America says "eh this state isn't important" obviously no hate this is a great video, just seems kinda weird to me.
You explained yourself though, "in us history" is the key point. US history is so short compared to the history of most other places in other countries that they'd never pay attention to it. From a foreign perspective it has no export value, every country has places with local significance, the mistake was making a global franchise focus on one of those. I'm not going to bother going out of my way to learn what makes Boston significant and unique in a country I'll never visit. That's why Washington DC and Vegas worked well, they have icon value abroad too that isn't inherently tied to their country of origin.
Especially when you take into account Europe and Asia have singular buildings older than the US is as a country, it quickly gets drowned out to the point there's no reason to care. And its greatest call to fame is something that most people just attribute to the country as a whole, so even when focused on by the game it feels more like a generic American aspect that could be done anywhere without any sense of loss.
I'm sure Boston resonated really well with American's but it was just Generic City A for most gamers abroad.
@@Robinxen crap take
@@Necromediancer crap comment
@@Robinxen very well put together comment. As an American I agree. Not everyone studies american history especially not that far back. Give everyone something. New Orleans, Miami, even New York would be a better setting than Boston.
@@totosakigami7181 🙂
The problem wasn't Boston. The problem was the implementation of Boston. For example, Faneuil Hall in the real world is an iconic landmark, separated by a plaza and kind of stands by itself. In FO4 it is just dwarfed by other buildings RIGHT on either side, making the building look small and run down. Where's the aquarium or even the pier? Union Oyster House (would have been damn funny if it were somehow operating)? In an effort to try to capture Boston's narrow and twisting streets, they forgot to capture the iconic landmarks in such a way to make the player go "wow". They were just all run-down shitty versions instead of reimagined decent ones with the possible exception of Fenway.
They made Boston dull and brown. Boston is cold and known for fall and winter - so what do we get from the FO4 team? No snow and no fall colors. Go download a Winter Mod or Seasons and the environment changes dramatically for the better.
In short, the devs dropped the ball on Boston. For FO5, I'd love to see NY or SF (LA was FO1) or Seattle or even a city like London or Paris. But whatever it is, they need to make the world attractively run down and not just a shitstain, especially if it's 200+ years after the bombs dropped.
I think viriginia would be badass because of the civil war and one of the first settlements and Indians and trading with settlers
Fallout 76?
Dude you make amazing content I see you going places speaking all I had to search up was fallout 5 and you popped up keep it up man
A strategy game. Many PC games have true strategic games. Fallout 5 could take Fallout 4 to that level. Can be set anywhere geographically but use the settlement building options to build defensive camps, with "settlers" turned into militia groups who the player can send out on attacks. Ultimately there is a common threat, say a huge Super Mutant Army building up and ready to attack "the world." So, part of the strategy of the game would be to rally allies. Maybe the player has to make contact with raiders and gunners and win them over to work with you and your militia settlements against a common enemy, the Mutant Army. How you build your armed camps, deploy troops, and plan to take on and defeat this invading Mutant Army is the strategy the player chooses and employs. And! make it possible to lose. Yes, maybe the Mutants want to fight their way across "the world" and get into a vault where they capture a secret weapon. If they do, you lose and can start over and play again.
Each time you play it, you can try different methods and engage in different strategies. Fallout 4 is my single favorite video game. I am playing through start to finish a third time, choosing to play it different each time. I have not bought Fallout 76 because of all the negativity surrounding it. Maybe I will if 76 can be an enjoyable single-player experience. Have no interest whatsoever in online, multi-player play. Video games are an escape time for me, I want to be alone and want to enjoy the games at my own pace and when I want to play. I hope Fallout 5 takes the best of 4 and it is an awesome game.
Am I the only one wondering how the Texans would’ve gotten along with the apocalypse? Fallout Houston guys, let’s do it.
*Flashbacks to Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel*
Fallout 5 playing as an overseer would be cool
My guess is they will go somewhere that really hasn't been explored in the Fallout series yet, so far we have seen the West Coast and Nevada, the mid-Atlantic region (Boston, Washington and West Virginia), I'd put money on something like Southern Florida (Miami) or the Midwest (Chicago). Though, I suppose it's still possible that since the other Bethesda releases were on the mid Atlantic east coast, they could do something like New York or Philadelphia to keep factions like the Institute and the DC based Brotherhood in play.
Yeah my first thought was Florida. New York would be just another city with skyscrappers and a grid layout. Florida gives the neon city of Miami, the swamps of the everglades, Cape Canaveral, Disney World, old Spanish heritage, the Florida Keys. The look would be a lot different from what we've seen so far.
When I was playing Fallout 76 I had so much fun going on my immortal quest of finding a musket. Exploring the ruins of civil war battles and armories and all locations in between.
I disagree with what you said about the story, about how it wasn't one of the most vital aspects of the franchise. I've always enjoyed delving into the storyline and lore.
I think you might change your opinion about Boston as a “lackluster” location if you took a more historically informed perspective.
New England is the birthplace of this nation. Revolutionary War? Ring a bell?
It’s a unpopular opinion to like Boston which is really bad because I personally love the location.
@@Saffronbulb ong I love walking around the commonwealth
Why is it a bad opinion to like Boston?
See as a Brit I kind of value Boston as a City its history etc! .....and having known quite a few Irish Lads alongside Chicago its important because the amount of Irish Lads and Lasses or those of descent who inhabit the City!
Plus don't get baseball it's Rounders with Advertising but if I was to follow a team it'd probably be Red Sox as a outsider Boston and Baseball are just two things I put together Lol
I am not even American and I agree it was a perfect location. History has a powerful impact, especially when it is the cradle of the US’s great civilization. And the universe of Fallout needs to be set in America, their satire and criticism demands it
New York. Just imagine a city in the subways populated by ghouls. I feel New York would really work.
Went on a road trip recently and went through DC, philly, NYC, and Boston and Boston was my favorite city out of all of those even New York City so I personally think it’s slept on as a fallout setting
Yes, the only thing Fallout lack is winter biomes. Detroit would be a great next Fallout location. Hunting deers, bears, trying to stay warm to survive in winter (yes, a season system has to be implemented).
I'd like an added aspect to that for maybe a more difficult survival setting where you have to store some farmed food for the winter, maybe even with the need of preservation
@@joshstainton8207 It's time to make Fallout a true survival game, not just a generic RPG.
@@MrDosonhai yeah I've always wanted more of a struggle to the settlement system and wanted a more homesteady feel to things(I'm more of a builder instead of a fighter). But an option to disable or lessen the difficulty of this could also make the warmongerers happy
I think you just said what we're all thinking you're really good at making these videos thank you for bringing back hope for fallout I know it's 2022 and this video was made a year 1 ago
Vault 0 (also known as Calculator's lair) is a location in Fallout Tactics that can be reached from Cheyenne Mountain.
I loved Boston. It was fun to just go location to location, scavenging yes but also learning the history of each place, no matter its scale.
We're waiting for Starfield, followed by the next Elder Scrolls, before the next Fallout which means we have about another 7 years still. I think Fallout 76 will be doing just fine.
What we need to see is that bethesda makes a game that dosen't have many game breaking glitches
They need to make a good fucking new engine ._.
@@yitami2000 true
I want pipboy choice, imagine having the choice of
PipBoy2000 : VATS doesnt stop time
PipBoy3000 : VATS slows time
PipBoy3500 : VATS Stops time
And imagine choosing which Vault you come from based on the type of PipBoy you pick
2:35 goul mountys
My personal wishlist is for fallout 5 to have a voiced protagonist but give the option for "classic" gameplay which muted the character, a new engine which will probably happen by the time it's out, and co-op but not multiplayer. One extra person could serve the role of a companion but still give it the same experience as a single player world. Making it a multiplayer game ruins the feel of the game because everything respawns and resets to how it was without you but that wouldn't happen with co op
What I want to experience in the next fallout edition is some bloody good RPG experiences. This includes a good God damn story.
My Pitch for a Fallout 5 would take place in San Francisco. “But what about the older games?” well, it’s been a while, and I’d say 10 years or so after New Vegas’s plot line so the BoS or the NCRs role could be very different with the time passed. Anyways, already with San Fran being iconic (bridge and all) it would also be a great place environmentally for fallout. They could have parts of the map be desert, forest, city, ocean, mountains, a bunch of stuff depending on how big they want to make it. California has always been a great place for Fallout games with all the diverse landscapes. We could also be Introduced to a bunch of cool new factions. Like maybes there’s a new rival, akin to Caesers legion, but from up north. Or maybe the NCR had a civil war and broke into like three different sub-factions, and one could be NCR remnants and the other could be named a new faction. (The Mormon-ites?) They could also play around with parts of San Fran being underwater, like half the city is sunk because of tectonic plates/nuclear warfare and it could incorporate new ways of travel like having to use boats, and go through parts of San Fran (that arnt half submerged) like Venice. these are just some dumb ideas I came up with on the spot, I’m sure way more talented people at best heads/obsidian could make something really cool.
San Francisco when Kellogg was a mercenary there would be a perfect tie-in to Fallout 4, too. It could even take place before Black Isle Studio's Fallout 2 and make the Enclave the primary bad guys. Perhaps we could meet Harrigan before the Enclave made him into an abomination. We could be in the aftermath of the destruction of the Master and his supermutant army from Fallout 1. Lots of places to go in a Fallout: San Francisco
Damn I Was Watching You’re Video’s And Thought You Where A Big Channel But I Just Realized You Only Have 166 Subscribers And You’re Pushing Out Content This Quality That Looks Like Content From Someone With A Couple Hundred Thousand Maybe A Even Million Subscribers You Just Got A Sub From Me Bro!
Big things coming your way. The quality of this content is way too high for you to not experience massive growth. I won’t forget I was here before you were famous lol
I appreciate you saying that
Count me in! This content is genuinely awesome
@@David-rg7px thanks, man
My dream fallout is having the whole country as the map. And then they can re introduce all the factions that they had in all the past games. And ofc introduce new ones.
I think it would be cooler if instead of coming out of a vault it would a place hundreds of years after where the world it built up more and the wasteland starts building bigger city's like maybe include new Francisco then there could be a cool return of the NCR back into the story
we already have a sort of space version of Fallout in "The Outer Worlds" game.
Texas would be cool, between Houston, San Antonio, and DFW, you got a lot to work with city wise, as well as iconic locations (Stockyards in FW, Alamo in SA)
Actually, I can see why they picked Boston and the majority of Massachusetts; key centre of many events throughout the American Revolution which is something I, as a Brit, knew very little about other than "It happened and we lost" and "Sometimes, I think the US would have been better off if WE'D won the War of Independence..." (I mean, you guys certainly wouldn't have had Presidents like Nixon, Regan and Trump, that's for sure...) because the British Education System doesn't seem to think our part in that is worth bringing up in History Class, so leave FO4 alone,please..
It would be dope to Set a fallout game in Colorado, We have a lot of stuff out here that could be interesting for a fallout game.
Especially if you consider the potential for the NCR and the other factions being there.
Don’t forget, Out here we are also close to New Mexico and Oklahoma and Texas not being far from us along with many other states.
The no pressure at the end was the icing on the cake
honestly my vote is for nashville....grew up there and would LOVE to see a fallout game take place in the southeast and nashville is the perfect location with its party and music based culture. nashville is the Vegas of the south and all of the creature possibilities would be so cool
I love fo4. I'd like to see Seattle, San Fran or San diego, Portland, NY NY, and so much more
fallout 4 was good to me and l still play it . I have over 10000 hours and climbing.... but they still need to fix a lot of that game.... fallout 5 would be cool if it join with fallout 4 or have it in Alaska with a touch of Canada.... thanks for you video it was great..... and I pray that God will keep you and your family safe..... I'm from Canada 😃
There are a ton of cool locations in that area, Heinz, Skagway, White Horse. Not to mention all the small towns. The mountainous environment would be refreshing to explore after Skyrim is no longer the most recent elder scrolls game. And the lore between the invasion of Alaska and the annexation of Canada could be explored much further.
We can always have a fallout that takes places right after the nukes, radiation storms would actually be deadly now, we could even finally introduce cars and vehicles! and for the teams we could have:
The army: they're recruiting every possible citizen and are quickly becoming tyrannical but they're attempting to keep raiders at bay.(they could have tanks and vehicles even planes!)
The Enclave: They're trying to stop the military and gain complete control and bring back American values (But they consider ghouls a lost cause)(they also could have tanks, vehicles even planes)
The Police force: Think of the minuteman but with lacking weapons and they're not strategic at all (ofcourse you change that).
and the Yes man could be a relatively new group called the Brotherhood of Steel 😉 who are recruiting people to their cause and push back the corrupt US government (if you help ofcourse)
For enemies we could have:
Crazy Ghouls: they still look human but they're brains are fried.
Classic Ghouls
The Gangs/Mafia or classic brutal raiders.
Chinese scouts/infiltrators/spies or even Chinese infantry squads that have tanks and vehicles.
I still love Fallout 4 because the location and it's where I've always lived. I even lived in two of the towns. Also like other folks have said the community building is just so much fun.
I like how most end of the world type games have videos made for them with that one level from crysis
I'm here! 😎 Great video, just posting a comment to show some support! Keep up the good work. 🤙
You my friend deserve more attention. You have earned my subscription and id say this time between fallout games allows us to make the games bethesda gave us better with modding and already the minecraft scene is rapidly catching up! There are mods for minecraft that recreate fallout pretty well I myself am making a fallout/bioshock modpack for minecraft and I can say I'll gladly wait and it gives me time to enjoy starfield :) great video and love the humor.
I have a lot of suggestions. But heres a few:
Should have it take place in another country like Japan or something. And take a page from bioware and obsidian on making in depth dialog options. Instead of pick your yes system. And make it so you can circle back around to subjects. Like if there's a charisma check you don't have the level for. Make it so you can leave and get your charisma up then come back to unlock that dialog.
Also make it so you can change your characters voice like in DAI both male and female created characters have 2 voice options. Have companions get at least one special move with a cool down like they'll pull out and use a pistol and then go back to using thier equipped weapon you gave them, thier own perks and have 2 max companions come with you like in outer worlds or be like the DA trilogy so you can have cross combos, build your companions to add extra strategy or even play as them and swap back and forth.
Also if you have companions make it so it increases a certain Stat with each different one. Like one makes you more stealthy, increases your intelligence, strength or makes hacking easier etc. And get a unique perk with max affinity and after doing a companion quest like in DA1. And have it so diffrent companions open up even more dialog options for diffrent factions or npcs who share the same view points. Make it so you can walk or run through your companion like in outer worlds so no more getting stuck in cramped places. Add vehicles like a vertibird, car, horses, boats or maybe monsters like ride a deathclaw. add in gliders and zip lines. And have more attachments for power armor like mounted turrets, melee weapons, and wrist mounted guns. And be able to put settlers in power armor. have it so you have more control over the factions. Like have hideouts you control in a miny game. And send out people on missions you get in game rewards for. Or send them out to collect stuff. Also have it so you can claim a settlement in game for a faction and have new building objects.
@Anne O'Nymous nah, That'd get old and be boring. Besides There's only a few places in the U.S. for interested locations. Now what would be fun is to jump off the eiffel tower in power armor or fight an army of ghouls on what's left of the great wall of China. That sounds more interesting then say a post apocalyptic New York or Seattle. Also it wouldn't just be the location we'd also get to see what happened to the rest of the world. And if there was another company like vault tech over seas. And we'd see new factions.
a subway system with people that have lived down there for years and you show the m the above ground world and Bild them a settlement
Fallout 5 needs to go to nyc.
Talking about location, I think SOOOO much can be done with New Orleans. The Jazz, the Mafia, the Cajun accent and cuisine, the Alligators, the Sports, FRENCH QUARTER!, the urban city vs the muggy swamps, the Voodoo, the Church, SOOOOOOO MUCH to build off of. New Orleans is about as iconic of a locations Fallout could explore.
Chicago as a location: mountains, forest, lakes in wild part of map and city in ruins on the other side
Perfect Fallout and Skyrim crossover
Fallout 76 dosen't fit into the fallout world really the whole online bs needs to disappear.
That never happen because of story and lore
Subscribed. How have you not got more followers!?
I want Bethesda to give Obsidian another go but with more of a free hand this time think what they could do !!
Full agreement - hell, they both now belong to Microsoft, right? So take the IP from Badthesda, as they have mismanaged it ever since acquiring it! NV was the only bright spot during that long darkness! Give it to Obsidian, give them 4 years to make a game (with the option of adding a year, if they truly need it)...oh and SCRAP THE ENGINE! Left over from Morrowind (at least partially), that is too old!
England, London would make an epic Fallout. Houses of Parliament, Buckingham Palace, Millennium Wheel, Trafalgar Square, The Thames, wrecked out Routemasters and dodgy underpass tunnels leading you under a train track. If it had the grungy greyish wash to it that Fallout 3 did, I would be so excited to play that.
Hm...no military bases there (at best you'd find police station and as British cops aren't armed, there's not many guns around...so probably not really fun -.-)
I think that an ideal location for a Fallout 5 would be New York (State and City), it's a well known city in the United States, and it doesn't go too far from the "specialness" of where the Fallout franchise takes place. It's also near Boston, so maybe the next Fallout would be tied to Fallout 4 somebow? And since New York has the Yankees and Boston has the Red Sox, it would only make sense for a Fallout New York to have baseball references in it too.
I also see it possible that the next Fallout game would be a multiplayer game (which we all know is a greate mistake) but would also have a singleplayer option for if a player wants to play it alone, as a lone wanderer.
Just my guess though, not really going to happen, I already know, but it's possible that Bethesda and Microsoft are thinking about it now
And a Montreal dlc hahahahahaha
Sam Francisco and Los Angeles were already covered in Fallout 1 & 2, Kansas and Illinois were covered in Fallout Tactics but those games aren’t well liked. The big candidates I can think of would be Florida, Texas, or New York State. But hopefully in the new Fallout they give new monsters related to the location, such as mutant alligators if it’s in Florida, or Armadillos if it’s Texas
Settlement building but not restricted to specific areas but the ability to build wherever we want. Also less boarded up houses and more buildings to explore. Important landmarks that also exist irl and more truly unique and legendary weapons not just legendary effects on random variations.
I think having optional co-op could be fun.
Like you’re going around the wasteland doing good and your friend’s doing bad things or you’re both collecting junk to scrap.
maybe when your friend joins a group and you different group which has oppesite ideals you could try to mess up whatever your friend does and vice versa or join the same group and do what you can todo everything ASAP
@@john34261 yeah stuff like that.
@@KDDTHNDR it could be fun and you could mislead your friend you're doing something else while doing a mission of the group oppesite them after they completed a mission which their group wanted
That was amazing I am subscribing for that speech I grew playing the Bethesda games, New Vegas Fallout 4, Fallout 3 and I think took the wrong turn when fallout 76 came out. I think you made some very valid arguments of where the game is I rlly like the Detroit one and Texas I can imagine a game like that you explained perfectly how I would what the game to be. Thank you.
Fallout Alcatraz
I love the multiplayer aspect. Polish that and I'd be a happy vault-dweller
Lets just hope in 2079 when fallout 5 is released you can spare a lot more people like *cough* *cough* kellog
Look, have an optional co-op system in 5, emphasis on optional. As opposed to what 76 did. Pair it with the building system but integrate that into every joinable faction in a functional way and have the ability to create you're own with a heavy emphasis on RP. For instance, imagine a minutemen but evil and as cutthroat as the raiders from nuka-world as determined by you and being able to complete the game as such(plus elimination of Garvy), with the ability to either bring other factions under your control as well as diamond city and determine the lifestyle of its citizens. You could recruit into your faction, having a system to determine the creation of an army and its units and equipment which can be built up over time. Or have a dynamic world where that could happen without your input or knowledge and you could be forced to face such a faction as it vies for control after it builds itself up. One day you could just be minding your own business buying some booze when suddenly the minutemen occupy the town or city your in and demands the citizens submit(including you) to their authority at gun point, and you can or you can attempt to escape depending upon where you're located in the city, or you can initiate a resistance. Another element I would like is the ability to completely wipe out a faction from a location permanently then have the ability to alter that environment.
For instance, you can wipe the gunners out completely across the commonwealth then take over their old bases with your faction, and maybe every now and then or have a player trigger to instigate that faction into attempting to take back that location from you, and if they do and they go onto recapture all their old bases, perhaps they'll come after your land and attempt to wipe you out, this would give the player an incentive to align with other factions in the early stages.
Maybe the other co-op players can join different factions and you can war with each other, that would be really fun. Sadly you just can't specifically do that with 76.
I like the co op in 76 but don’t think theres enough, you should be able to progress through the story with other players and you can’t do that in 76 due to privatized interiors.
If they gonna make a new fallout I hope they make it single-player, same perk machenics as in fallout 4 and just a longer story
Low key the perk level up system hurt the game overall old leveling system with skills was better
Ye i meant skills i forgot the word
Wow, someone with the same views and location choices. Detroit would be a prime location: rich history (especially 50's theme), manufacturing hub that would serve as a good introduction to vehicles, ambassador bridge to canada. Florida would also be great, especially the space coast, could have dlc in miami, the keys, and orlando.
My idea on how Boston IS a big symbol of Fallout's America is it's importance in the very beginning of America. The start of the revolution started near Boston, and it's still an important location after the fall of America.
Need to stop with this online BS and go back to single player stories. Or maybe a co-op mode in which the difficulty of survival goes up. Maybe bring in different modes of survival along with it such as you need to eat and sleep but not have it forced on you more of a choice. I think a return to D.C or maybe going to New York would allow players to have that original feeling again alot of people around the world have heard about both places. New York also has a corrupt past with the mafia and could center itself around a return to form. Just ideas. I just dont want an online game from Bethesda.
Keep it optional! I myself hate survival modes with a passion, I do "maintenance" (eating, sleeping, taking a shower etc.) in RL, so I don't need or want that in my games!
As for location: HAWAII!
Why? Pearl Harbor for one (major military base!) and the possibility of both giving the player a mobile home (a boat in that case!) and to do Island-Hopping...and maybe a Japan or China DLC!
I think we'll go back to the Mojave Wasteland. There are multiple references to the NCR and the West Coast in Fallout 4.
Personally, I'd love to see one in Seattle
my hope is with microsoft owning them and obsidian that maybe we will get another obsidian fall out
I’ve never seen someone cook as good as this man did
Its funny because at Bethesda, the focus is on the price/cost probabilities of their product lines and the rate of return in their asset investments.
Talk of making a game 'special' is totally fucking alien to them.
I hope the next game is either set in New York or Anchorage. They would both be insanly fun to explore
Michigan, Detroit because of the Enclave. That would be great to see in Fallout 5.
When I think of iconic places in America Boston is definitely in my top 3 because of the history behind it, I think the reason people say it doesn’t feel the same is because Bethesda didn’t expand on the history behind it
I’ve seen some concept art of a space shuttle; I would love to see some missions using it to go to the archimedes satellite. Maybe something to do with a hacker that’s taken it over and is using it in an extortion racket?
They did say (I think) that after elder scrolls 6 they will make fallout 5, so basically 1500 years.
How about a charecter pre selecter where perks are linked to the charecter but keep the SPECIAL their, be a vault dweller, a wastelander who faound a pipboy, etc it is like telling difrient story from multipal point of view and thsy could converge at some point in time and the karma system as well. Adding keep the power armor function like in falout 4 and 76
Boston makes perfect sense given your logic. D.C. is iconic for what it represents, the US GOVT as it exists. Boston was where the Revolution began. Therefore, it represents what America was envisioned to become versus what it became.
Fallout 5 will be Alaska. That's my guess.
Here me out. This is a bit out of the box but what about Colorado? It has a lot of huge mountains that could be explored and the city of Denver which would be cool to go through. Idk I feel like the mountains would be a huge change that would spice up the series and take it to a new place that isn't really seen all that much in other fallout games.