F-35 Pilots Answer The Web's Most Searched Questions

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024

Комментарии • 416

  • @heavyizthacrown-5842
    @heavyizthacrown-5842 Год назад +538

    It’s going to be 20 years before we really know what this jet is capable of

    • @Sajuuk
      @Sajuuk Год назад +63

      Yep. So much of it is still classified normal plebs like us have no clue and won't until decades later.
      Even "known" basic stats such as range and max speed are only approximations, good enough for public consumption but not accurate enough for enemy nations such as Russia and China to rely on for actual combat situations.
      Western nations are known to publish under-performance figures while Russia and China generally post over-approximations.

    • @rayreyes977
      @rayreyes977 Год назад +2

      @@Sajuuktrue

    • @KillingMachineMechanic
      @KillingMachineMechanic Год назад +6

      Most definitely true. Even a lot of maintainers don’t know that much until they start to gain a higher skill level obviously, but there is a lot more public knowledge on the F35 as opposed to the F22

    • @jacksonsingleton
      @jacksonsingleton Год назад +11

      You're so hopeful. The F-22 entered IOC nearly 20 years ago, and we still have only seen glimpses of the cockpit.

    • @onesplash0one819
      @onesplash0one819 Год назад

      Not in the current climate

  • @gingerlicious3500
    @gingerlicious3500 Год назад +230

    Lockheed Martin is going on a publicity tour for the F-35 and I'm here for it

  • @dupond9248
    @dupond9248 Год назад +193

    God damn I love the military industrial complex. I hope henry kissinger does this format next

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 Год назад +12

      Honestly man I used to think that the MIC was all bloated and corrupt.
      But seeing how niche and wild some of their products are, the costs genuinely make sense.
      I just wish it has less bureaucracy. But what can you expect from the government lol.

    • @slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257
      @slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257 Год назад +1

      @@honkhonk8009 Why less bureaucracy? We're spending money on our own domestic industries, as long as there's no national emergency, it makes perfect sense to spread the labor out.

    • @raindrop8061
      @raindrop8061 Год назад

      @@honkhonk8009 i mean they charge like 3x what the product should go. Def in the last few years

    • @yomama629
      @yomama629 Год назад +1

      @@honkhonk8009 defense contractors are definitely fucking us over on what they charge for their products, we should be paying a lot less for the same tech. I do love the kind of R&D this buys tho

  • @abbieamavi
    @abbieamavi Год назад +31

    This was super interesting, and I love how humorous and humble they are :)

  • @mosidian
    @mosidian Год назад +93

    I like how they just skipped the "Supercruise" question. obviously not allowed to talk about it there

    • @d.thieud.1056
      @d.thieud.1056 Год назад +9

      According to stuff I found elsewhere, it can apparently do so but o my for a short time. My guess would be the engine can handle it, but the extra strain it puts on the engine would make its maintenance more expensive

    • @tobilikebacon
      @tobilikebacon Год назад +7

      @@d.thieud.1056from what i heard it can supercruise but only after the afterburner helped it past Mach.

    • @d.thieud.1056
      @d.thieud.1056 Год назад +1

      @@tobilikebacon that makes sense too, drag increases massively neat Mach, but drops quite a bit as soon as you're past.
      This can be minimised by area ruling but stealth took priority over area rule in the 35

    • @slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257
      @slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257 Год назад

      @@d.thieud.1056 It wouldn't really make sense anyway. It's only permitted to exceed mach 1 for relatively little time during a flight to minimize wear on its RAM. Of course, in a desperate situation they'd exceed these limits if necessary, but at that point they'll turn on the afterburners anyway.
      Supercruise might be useful for something doing an intercept on a high speed object but also needs to also conserve fuel, but the F-35 isn't an interceptor.

    • @d.thieud.1056
      @d.thieud.1056 Год назад

      @@slightlyirradiatedmuffin3257 going supersonic has more uses than just going some place fast. Pushing past the sound barrier, and the immense drag-spike this causes, allows missiles to go much further. A missile fired from Mach 0.98 will have a surprisingly significant reduction in range and top speed from one fired from Mach 1.01.
      Another reason besides fuel consultation this is extremely valuable is IR signature.
      Being detectable by radar only from 15km away is theat valuable if you're easy to spot from, say, 40km by IRST. The F-35s bleed air shrouded exhaust addresses that problem and probably fixes it when it's not afterburning, but if does it might get itself detected while trying to make its own missile more lethal

  • @DNModels
    @DNModels Год назад +15

    Oh. Yeah. Keep switching between the boards.
    That makes it even better.

  • @johnpaulbacon8320
    @johnpaulbacon8320 Год назад +53

    Wonderful informative video. The F-16 , F-35 , F-22 are all very capable jets. Yes All of the F-35's and F-22 can be used in a manner like Other fighters - with weapons and fuel tanks mounted under the wings. If your worried about the planes RCS being compromised you could have some configured in a standard manner and other's setup for stealth so the planes with a standard configuration can be accompanied by and protected by the stealth configured jets.

  • @mitkoliondar1
    @mitkoliondar1 Год назад +22

    you skipped few parts😂

    • @savageassassin5976
      @savageassassin5976 Год назад +4

      Yeah they even skipped the supercruise part 😂😂😂

  • @docohm50
    @docohm50 Год назад +4

    I was at Eglin with LM and trained the military how to maintain the F-35. Best visual I can give you about facing a F-35 is put a blindfold on in a pitch black room. Wear a pair of headphones with music turned up full volume. Now stand in the room blind and deaf and wait because I am eventually going to punch you in the mouth you just don't know when. That's what it is like in a dog fight against a F-35 or F-22 fighter. You're going to feel the suck.

  • @oceanic8424
    @oceanic8424 Год назад +18

    The secret sauce is all in the fantastic radar, sensor fusion, and networking capabilities of the platform.

    • @Dumbwaytodie3920
      @Dumbwaytodie3920 Год назад +3

      also the easy upgradebility for future systems

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 Год назад +1

      The networking is prolly the biggest part.
      Just because data is really important in todays battlefield, especially with AI.
      Theres a reason why Palantir used weather data in their algorithms, to predict terrorists.
      Same algorithm that killed bin laden.
      The truth is, America ever since WW2, has blurred the lines between military and civillian industry.
      The microsoft holo-lens you saw used for minecraft, is now used in the marine corps.
      Everything from the corporate culture to the management paradigms is heavily related to teh civillian industry, since we dont have a military history to begin with.

  • @rky824
    @rky824 Год назад +11

    They look everything but pilots

  • @gowtriks9222
    @gowtriks9222 Год назад +7

    Hi I had the chance to see F35 demonstration at Paris air Show, he took off just over my head and I almost lost hearing 😅 amazing aircraft anyway !

  • @trfmusic902
    @trfmusic902 Год назад +6

    Love this! Would like to see more of this for other aircraft

  • @KevinEnjoyer
    @KevinEnjoyer Год назад +6

    Bruh this is exactly what I thought it was going to be; the pilots knew that almost everything about the jet was classified, and thus couldn't say many things they wanted to say.
    For example, I bet they weren't allowed to talk about the engineering of the F-35B's VTOL abilities, or the tape that covers all the edges of the plane, or the fact that there's so much bleeding edge technology in the stealth design of the plane.

    • @michelestefanini5466
      @michelestefanini5466 Год назад +2

      that's what I said lol. When they answered the "parts" question they told nothing about the parts or the materials but told us where they were made lmao

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock Год назад

      Funnily enough I could search up more info on the f35 than what these pilots provided. Weird considering in Lockheeds other videos we got more "detailed" info on the f35

  • @wirehyperspace
    @wirehyperspace Год назад +2

    @so when going to go free electric antigravity motors

  • @sonabagchi7194
    @sonabagchi7194 Год назад +5

    An F-35 with GE XA100 Engine would be awesome as it will reveal the actual potential of this aircraft

  • @apuuvah
    @apuuvah Год назад +2

    It's an electronic warfare plane, recon and targetting plane, air superiority fighter and ground attack fighter. A multi-role fighter.

  • @ismailnyeyusof3520
    @ismailnyeyusof3520 Год назад +4

    This is a good promotion video for an advanced fighter that’s probably already the most successful one to date purely because so many countries have bought and deployed it. What really makes it successful is that its fighter doctrine which is based on data fusion will collect and store data from more sources than simply any other fighter. Data is the new oil and authoritarian countries dare not share their secrets widely so the F-35 can maintain, and only grow, its superiority and capabilities from here on.

  • @antifragile6449
    @antifragile6449 Год назад +2

    I love this A/C but sometimes it makes me feel too much sluggish, compared to my previous fighter. But APC is the greatest thing!!!

  • @sirtoast1545
    @sirtoast1545 Год назад +37

    “Even a low average pilot can do it”🫡

    • @user-jx3ow3ok9z
      @user-jx3ow3ok9z Год назад +11

      He said below average - he probably needs more simulator hours 😅

  • @cosacoim
    @cosacoim 2 месяца назад

    Ive got some more interesting questions….
    1.- Can perform at any altitude supercruise? (For A model)
    2.- What can do with the Barracuda system?

  • @reynaldo_santos
    @reynaldo_santos Год назад +20

    Thank you both of you F-35 Pilot I learned a lot of things when I listening to you , I wish Lockheed Martin can create 6th and 7th gen jet advance fighter. 🙏🙏🙏

    • @tuxguy1579
      @tuxguy1579 Год назад +4

      They can.

    • @Lbcyoung
      @Lbcyoung Год назад +2

      Same here! Amazing video, with simplified information that makes things way more understandable but no less fascinating.

    • @reynaldo_santos
      @reynaldo_santos Год назад

      Yeah , but there's a lot things and secret of F-35 that they tried to hide , because this jet is 1 of main weapon of U.S. maybe a lot..

    • @AugmentedGravity
      @AugmentedGravity Год назад

      What?

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 Год назад +4

      Don't underestimate Skunkworks 🤣🤣

  • @silvestergachinga5604
    @silvestergachinga5604 Год назад +1

    hands down aside from being a fan of the SR-71 Black Bird, this is another remarkable jet you guys have produced

  • @notaulgoodman9732
    @notaulgoodman9732 Год назад +4

    I like to imagine them being picked for filming this video like the scene where they picked John Glenn for Mercury in the right stuff. Carrier landing then these lads go to the people in suits asking for them and then they're briefed while jets and the seas are roaring in the background. It's funny because this isn't Mercury but they're pilots and I think they find themselves in that situation a lot.

  • @aandc2005
    @aandc2005 Год назад +10

    Another fact the F-35 is the world's most powerful single engine fighter.. the engine in full burner about 45,000 lbs of thrust.. the F15 with two engines puts out about the same combine in full burner .. I wish Lockheed would make a twin engine fighter down the road using the F-35 engines👍😄 also those HUD carbon fiber helmets aren't cheap at all about $400,000 ea...

    • @ikkinwithattitude
      @ikkinwithattitude Год назад +2

      The B-21 uses 2x F135 engines, which makes me think that might be an excessive configuration for a 4th/5th gen style fighter.
      6th gen seems to be big enough to make use of the extra thrust, but they're aiming for adaptive cycle engines for that.

    • @AugmentedGravity
      @AugmentedGravity Год назад

      Why

    • @AugmentedGravity
      @AugmentedGravity Год назад +2

      @@ikkinwithattitudeThe B-21’s engines are also non afterburning. Adaptive Cycle Engines are planned for integration in the F-35’s as well.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Год назад

      NGAD will utilize dual adaptive cycle engine , each one is powerful than F135

    • @uberschnilthegreat22
      @uberschnilthegreat22 Год назад

      @@tluangasailo3663 As, more, less? You can't just say is powerful than F135

  • @severinp.7050
    @severinp.7050 Год назад +6

    nice, ignored the question if it can supercruise....love it

  • @johnlang150
    @johnlang150 5 месяцев назад

    Quick question and I know no secrets were said but even the little bit of information you just gave (althought I loved it), are you nervus the enemies are looking at this and building their version to match it or beat it???

  • @RayIzuu
    @RayIzuu Год назад +1

    I can tell he's counting words to not give out classified info and the lady's looking like the one putting him in check

  • @rainappleby
    @rainappleby 16 дней назад

    Is it true that F-35 pilots wear Casio G-Shock GW5000u???

  • @milkman3797
    @milkman3797 Год назад +1

    These guys working hard to remain within their classification status and contracts

  • @markoconnell804
    @markoconnell804 3 месяца назад

    What is it like to sit in for long periods of time? Is it comfy? Is it roomy?

  • @JustJohn505
    @JustJohn505 Год назад +1

    i enjoyed these type of videos. would love to see more

  • @Dstew57A
    @Dstew57A Год назад +4

    Well this was fun…probably made from extraterrestrial craft…using back engineered materials

  • @jocopowell
    @jocopowell Год назад

    Great video. Her smile makes me think of Brian Shaw.

  • @metincanturk4651
    @metincanturk4651 9 месяцев назад

    We would like to see these beautiful jets in our own air forces. loves from Turkey

  • @silvanomattioli9720
    @silvanomattioli9720 Год назад +2

    Does the F35 have an aircraft stick or a joystick like many commercial airplane ?
    Does it have rudder pedals ?

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 Год назад +1

      I think they use a sidestick.
      it makes sense to use a sidestick anyways since your gonna want to be manning all the other systems onboard aswell.
      Its also less alienating to pilots since most guys training for this are gonna be used to using a mouse for video games

    • @rs232killer
      @rs232killer Год назад +1

      As honk says, it is a side stick. It looks very much like a joystick you might use to fly a combat flight sim on your PC at home. It is mounted on the right side of the cockpit where it would be comfortable to hold onto it in a relaxed sitting position, with your arm like it is sitting on the armrest of a chair. Fun fact, the F-16 also has a side stick arrangement. However, the button / switch layout is different between the two.

  • @Wolfrider7
    @Wolfrider7 Год назад +3

    Awesome stuff!

  • @brillo31
    @brillo31 7 месяцев назад

    It appears Lockheed Martin has a UAP reverse engineering program, what is your opinion about this?

  • @blazept567
    @blazept567 Год назад +3

    I'm kinda disappointed at the VTOL question... I always thought that at least the internal ordinance wouldn't be a factor for the vertical operation; makes me wonder if the extra weight and complexity are actually worth it.

    • @captaincumrag42069
      @captaincumrag42069 Год назад +9

      So he didn't go into too much nuance but, the F-35 can take off with a weapons load but a very reduced weapons load, maybe just 2 aim-120s and that's it, no ammo for the gun and very little fuel. However the VTOL aspect does help the aircraft take off much quicker (STOL) so it can operate at sea on helicopter carriers and assault ships and very short runways. The biggest advantage however is that regardless of loadout it will always be able to land vertically which means it can land on some helicopter pads. So it can't magically take off vertically with a full load of weapons and fuel but it can take off very quickly with VTOL mode assisting and it can come back and land vertically on very small spaces. If it gets a engine and lift fan upgrade in the future it may be able to take off with a full fuel and weapons load.

    • @blazept567
      @blazept567 Год назад +2

      @@captaincumrag42069 excellent explanation, sir. Thank you!

    • @honkhonk8009
      @honkhonk8009 Год назад

      Not all F35 variants have Vtol, only the F-35B
      Vtol only makes sense for the Marine Corps.

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      The F-35B isn't a VTOL aircraft (nor is any other aircraft for that matter). It's a STOVL aircraft (Short take off/Vertical landing.) In order to take off vertically, the plane needs to have at least a 1:1 thrust to weight ratio. The empty weight of an F-35B is 32,410lbs. The amount of combined thrust between the engine and lift fan is ~40,000lbs. As soon as you add a pilot, that's another 150-250lbs. You're left with ~7,400lbs, to split between fuel and weapons. If you're carrying 2 JDAM and 2 AIM-120, that means at most you've got 4,700lbs of fuel. By the time you taxi and take off, you'll only have ~3,700lbs of fuel. Of that 3,700 you'll have to factor in contingency, diversion, and final reserves, along with trip fuel. Which basically means that you're taking off and landing at the same base, with no combat radius/persistence. It's an emergency feature only, and not operationally useable.

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      There's no upgrade that will allow VTOL with full fuel and weapons. Even full fuel and full internal weapons would require 50,000+lbs of thrust (or a ~10,000lb improvement over the current thrust.) To take off with full fuel and full weapons (including external ordnance) would require 60,000+ lbs of thrust.

  • @luiscoa45
    @luiscoa45 6 месяцев назад

    Fun video to watch!

  • @thinhnguyenduy4099
    @thinhnguyenduy4099 Год назад +2

    why did they skipped some of the question

  • @Saffi____
    @Saffi____ 6 месяцев назад

    These questions aren't that bad actually. Ive seen a lot more aggressive, for lack of a better term, questions like "How can you support something that can easily be destroyed by an F-16?" or "How can the F-35 be good if it cant dogfight?". I was hoping to see questions like these in here, but what you did have was decent.

    • @aquilesca5tr0
      @aquilesca5tr0 Месяц назад +1

      The f16 can´t detect the f35 outside of the no escape zone of most radar guided aa missiles

  • @wirehyperspace
    @wirehyperspace Год назад +1

    Looks like need a microfluid embroidery pattern robots patches for a ninja spacesuit

  • @dougkoepke
    @dougkoepke Месяц назад

    Can the f-35 maintain formation automatically so the pilot can focus on other tasks

  • @davetrousers
    @davetrousers Год назад +1

    Ordnance not Ordinance, very different things. The captions are wrong

  • @FLYBOY123456789
    @FLYBOY123456789 Год назад

    nicely done...proud to be an American...oorah.

  • @Cta2006
    @Cta2006 Год назад

    The F-35 has parts / components made by companies in USA, Norway, Denmark, United Kingdom, Israel, Turkey, Netherlands, Canada, Australia and Italy

  • @zimbolimbo2408
    @zimbolimbo2408 7 месяцев назад

    Respect for Monessa 'Siren' Balzhiser, on becoming the first women test pilot to fly the indomitable F-35.

  • @zenwarfare70
    @zenwarfare70 9 месяцев назад

    I´ve always wondered if the pilots have ever tried the VR systems for gaming, and what's their opinion.

  • @DaRadicalCavy
    @DaRadicalCavy Год назад

    Okay but how many results got removed because *classified* as I know a ton of simmers must of looked up some juicy Info hoping to find it somewhere knowing full well it would be illegal to post

  • @edwardhunter3647
    @edwardhunter3647 Год назад

    Thank you very much,I am trying to work with you all but I had a delay for some time,first I have to get all my paper works back in place with the department of defense,also I have to do some traveling for 18 months,and work with you all,I know your work time 4-10 hours days,it will give me time to get every thing in place,first I just want to get in the door with all the paper works in place ,I like helicopter ,F-35 air craft ,chinook helicopters ,but I want to be trained in all air craft,went it time to defense this country,you have to be ready to go to work.

  • @michaelkim3432
    @michaelkim3432 Год назад

    How come some of the questions were not answered at all? And why didn't they go in order? Is there a longer version out there? I mean I get that they can't just answer any question, but then why have it on the list in the first place?

  • @uruguayarms
    @uruguayarms 8 месяцев назад

    Cada año es mejorado y con nuevas prestaciones de sofware y hardware, si fuese tan malo, no fabricarían 800 o 900 unidades. Es el primer avión que puede mandar drones de ataques como el Valkyria, que se estan construyendo, en realidad el avión solo mandará a los drones ejecutar las acciones, mientras el capta toda la información posible.Es una supercomputadora dentro de un avión.

  • @ireallycant4416
    @ireallycant4416 Год назад

    now this is innovation far from movies and close to reality, connecting to your people and dominating your competition because your confident tested proven to the public and me as myself agree

  • @Spike_au
    @Spike_au Год назад

    Um..... Why was the supercruise question skipped

  • @faithblack3851
    @faithblack3851 Год назад

    Can't believe her call sign is "Siren". That is the best other than Phoenix or Valkyrie. Don't know if they were too cruel or too kind. I am living vicariously through her. Love it.
    BTW...They are just like Bob from Top Gun. Quite unobtrusive. All the pilot reviewers said Bob was the closest to real pilots in terms of manner. Excuse me...weapons specialist.

  • @nicholasjensen8016
    @nicholasjensen8016 Год назад

    Would have been kinda funny if this was just:
    Q: 1 A: classified
    Q: 2 A: classified
    Etc.

  • @michaeljewell8379
    @michaeljewell8379 Год назад

    will we get a version of this and the cockpit video but of the f22

  • @miraphycs7377
    @miraphycs7377 Год назад +1

    parts from all around the world? Isn't that a security concern?

    • @emmano6340
      @emmano6340 Год назад +1

      Pretty sure since EVER u guys built things with parts from all around the world. Brazilian rubber was used for US aircraft in ww2 (an example)

  • @DaveQZ85
    @DaveQZ85 Год назад +1

    They didn’t directly answer what it’s made of and gave a tangential PR response, as they should. Of course that shouldn’t be made public.

  • @wirehyperspace
    @wirehyperspace Год назад +3

    Can't wait till a quantum computing tractor beam comes out so can use on black hole to make it what it was before black hole destroyed it

    • @digitalsiler
      @digitalsiler Год назад

      man, where do I get what you're smokin?!?!

    • @wirehyperspace
      @wirehyperspace Год назад

      @@digitalsiler I wastzmoking anything but. I was looking at gorilla glue temple hash full melt because of my back problems - isn't part of space program skunk#$%^&*((#$%^&*( well antifreeze and opoids don't mix turn into poison and been around cars all life /everlasting life nonatechnologies to boost up your space program

  • @kevinmaccallum336
    @kevinmaccallum336 7 месяцев назад

    'Fat Amy' is a beautiful and potent multi-role et fighter...
    There is no substitute.

  • @pedrotalons1422
    @pedrotalons1422 Год назад +1

    Funny how they classified the first question too lol

  • @charlesstrader3005
    @charlesstrader3005 Год назад

    So how do I ask this question? Is it really better than the F-16? When was the last time a politician allowed a BVR shoot? Can' it out turn an F-16?

  • @YoungBoyGamer1080p
    @YoungBoyGamer1080p Год назад

    whats up with the supercruise question that got cut out

    • @Urria110
      @Urria110 6 месяцев назад

      That didn’t want to say I guess

  • @chillout1109
    @chillout1109 Год назад +13

    They were carefully and tactically cagey about answering some of the questions. For security and operational reasons, they obviously can't reveal everything about America's most advanced operational fighter jet. The enemies are listening too.

    • @aandc2005
      @aandc2005 Год назад +2

      I Agree 100% which is a good thing Putin watches RUclips also ..

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 Год назад +1

      China has those sensitive information now

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 Год назад +1

      @@ghostyt2950 Well I'm not exactly sure what info China has but 1 thing for sure is that they do have some info on the plane. Lockheed Martin's been hacked by China before.

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock Год назад +1

      The enemies not only are listening they literally already stole some f35 info lol

  • @calvernchua9333
    @calvernchua9333 Год назад

    Excuse me, where can I buy this?

  • @rajeevkumar9546
    @rajeevkumar9546 Год назад

    Can the f35 dogfight???
    Pilots: sorry sir, we don't do these type of questions

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      Yes, although the likelihood of needing to is slim. That being said, the kinematic performance of the F-35 matches or exceeds the jets it's replacing.

  • @michaelsbowers
    @michaelsbowers Год назад

    When did it first pick up the nickname “Fat Amy“, and is it just the Navy that refers to it as such, or do other branches call it that as well?

  • @artistjoh
    @artistjoh 3 месяца назад

    It is funny how armchair critics badmouth the F35, but the Air Forces and pilots who actually use it seem to love the aircraft. It is an amazing platform whose greatest act lies in the future as loyal wingman drones, and drone swarms become a big deal over the next 20+ years. It is designed for the future.
    If an aircraft pleases the Israelis you know it has to be very very good.

  • @notaulgoodman9732
    @notaulgoodman9732 Год назад +2

    Can you guys give me an F-35? I love the F-35C but the F-35A is also good, I'm kind of concerned with the F-35B because I'm not really good with maintaining moving parts.

    • @dedsussybaka4619
      @dedsussybaka4619 Год назад +2

      Sure
      Just give use your address and prepare a landing zone

  • @jollyrioger2572
    @jollyrioger2572 10 месяцев назад

    In 20 years when I’m 50 I’ll be able to fly it on DCS

  • @kenmahoney5255
    @kenmahoney5255 Год назад

    Thank you for your service guys

  • @miraphycs7377
    @miraphycs7377 Год назад +1

    mach 1.6 even for the f-35b?

    • @DermotiusOfficial
      @DermotiusOfficial Год назад

      It can do mach 1.6, im going to leave it at that

    • @dominiksoukal
      @dominiksoukal Год назад

      It's most likely more as the top speed for many US weapons is underreported. For example the supercarriers can go over 40 knots but their listed top speed is 30+.

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      Yes. All 3 variants can reach M1.6+ in combat. The restrictions on the B/C are for training only, to reduce sustainment costs over the life of the airframe, much like they're G restricted as well.

  • @radisvaliullin
    @radisvaliullin 6 месяцев назад

    More Monessa “Siren” Balzhiser on youtube!

  • @under1tiny876
    @under1tiny876 Год назад

    Now I know what kind of pilots they are

  • @IamTingster
    @IamTingster 7 месяцев назад

    What is this romper room?

  • @emogirl89allup
    @emogirl89allup Год назад

    What's the point of the F-35B if the vertical function is useless.

    • @tocu9808
      @tocu9808 Год назад

      Short Take Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL). Not Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL).

  • @runeacer74
    @runeacer74 Год назад

    “How do you do, fellow kids?”

  • @nexgen1701
    @nexgen1701 Год назад +1

    Here’s one; Does the F-35 contain partly reverse engineered alien technology. Your former Boss Ben Rich Told us you are using retrieved bits over at Lockheed Martin 😃

  • @ikkinwithattitude
    @ikkinwithattitude Год назад

    Invisible fighter jet? Someone needs to get DC's ear and convince them to give Wonder Woman an F-35! ;)

    • @AugmentedGravity
      @AugmentedGravity Год назад

      What

    • @ikkinwithattitude
      @ikkinwithattitude Год назад

      @@AugmentedGravity Wonder Woman used to have an invisible jet for some reason. Upgrading it to an invisible F-35 seems appropriate.

  • @christopherpuls651
    @christopherpuls651 Год назад

    Super ! Grüße an die Chefin ;)
    Es geht auch teuer , dann hat bestimmt Steuerpositionsdüsen und Racketenkraftstoff wie ne F14 NASA ;)))

  • @tgtg7182
    @tgtg7182 Год назад

    Can you fly the F35 without the helmet ?

  • @tomknapp6194
    @tomknapp6194 2 месяца назад

    I didn't realize that Greg Maddux was also a pilot!
    (Yes, I know it isn't Greg)

  • @Vsor
    @Vsor Год назад +4

    Lol, they skipped "What is the F-35s nickname"

    • @koc988
      @koc988 Год назад +4

      it has multiple I personally like "battle penguin"

    • @captaincumrag42069
      @captaincumrag42069 Год назад +1

      ​@@koc988My favorite is "fat Amy" although it's not really fat, it's a rather small and nimble fighter but I guess from some angles its quite wide looking, though it looks more muscular than anything.

  • @dropkick127
    @dropkick127 Год назад

    Skunk works fighting

  • @Nikalai
    @Nikalai Год назад

    I was kind of expecting the "can the f 35 dogfight"...

  • @anlenetrannguyen6078
    @anlenetrannguyen6078 9 месяцев назад

    How to find an F35 pilot to date???????

  • @srawat27
    @srawat27 8 месяцев назад

    How important is the Neuron density in the Caudate Putamen of the Human brain in selecting for pilots who can actually mind-meld with the UFO's yall have stored and actually pilot them?

  • @PortMoody1
    @PortMoody1 11 месяцев назад

    I wish Canada invested more into our military. I don't think we will even get one new plane for years to come. Also we use to have over 200 fighters and now we are buying less. It is not like our country is smaller. At least for now until someone takes it.

  • @barbarad.8174
    @barbarad.8174 Год назад

    I have a question for Siren. How Badass are you?

  • @watermirror
    @watermirror Год назад +1

    Can it supercruise? The 44,000 CPFH tells us it doesn't. But the new engine for NGAD might

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      1) The cost per flight hour has no relevance to supercruise capabilities.
      2) The cost per flight hour isn't $44k/hour. It's closer to $31k/hour vs $27k/hour for an F-16.

    • @watermirror
      @watermirror Год назад

      @@rogerbiggerstaff3293 1. Supercruise uses less fuel. Less heat, less strain to engine, less operational maintenance, less CPFH
      2. Some sources say 44k

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      @@watermirror supercruise uses less fuel than afterburners, but it doesn't use less fuel than subsonic cruise. It's still irrelevant to the CPFH computation.

    • @rogerbiggerstaff3293
      @rogerbiggerstaff3293 Год назад

      @@watermirror those sources are wrong.

    • @watermirror
      @watermirror Год назад

      @@rogerbiggerstaff3293 supercruise isn't always used, it's not like it needs to always go supersonic. But during supercruise, aside from less fuel, the added heat is still much less than afterburn, so less wear & slow ageing not just for the engine & nozzle but also for the tail parts, unlike the superhot afterburn.
      To start, the mach 1.6 max speed should've meant less CPFH since it means less fuel use & less heat produced compared to the similar weight but faster ones, but yet it's $44k. Weird. CPFH should've been much less compared to same weight but much faster & twin-engined F-15, or even less than the same weight & same speed twin-engined Superhornet. But it makes sense since reports stated that F-135 engine has serious issues esp insufficient cooling system, & the tail hugely affected by afterburn (entailing excessive heat for a mere mach 1.6 speed). So 44k CPFH (in relation with 30t weight & only mach 1.6 speed) tells us it's NOT supercruising
      Anyway, why is 44K wrong? And why is 31K right?

  • @sierra715
    @sierra715 Год назад

    I love how they edited out the supercruise question because It cant, unlike the F-22 lmao.

  • @vanexel9687
    @vanexel9687 11 месяцев назад

    #VeryCoolVideo 😎

  • @Standish342
    @Standish342 Год назад

    Best fighter ever.

  • @loganhouse6984
    @loganhouse6984 Год назад

    What a beautiful smart woman

  • @3dmax911
    @3dmax911 Год назад

    most important why the us dont sell the F22 Raptor like the F-35 ?

  • @HighEnergy001
    @HighEnergy001 Год назад

    The pilot on the right side looks like Giovanni Ribisi from Avatar!

  • @1Gaumer
    @1Gaumer Год назад +3

    Just going to gloss over that super cruise first question aren’t ya!
    Couldn’t possibly answer the question that might not be a yes.

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 Год назад

      They prob should've said 'not yet' seeing as the only engine capable of it is still in the works but oh well, it's an MIC ad

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 Год назад

      Supercruise is a loose term. Can it get to supersonic speeds without AB? Definitely yes. Can it maintain it? No. It will have to use AB. Though how long can it maintain supersonic flight without AB is what I don't know.

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 Год назад +1

      @@johnsilver9338 150nm after burning to Mach 1.2 and cutting it to mil. They don't throw around supercruise much because operationally it's not particularly game changing: the difference between Mach 0.9 and 1.8 over 200nm is like 12 minutes or smth and while supercruise is more efficieent than burner, its not more efficient per mile vs transonic cruise. Either balls to the wall or sit back and relax

  • @pohoheli
    @pohoheli Год назад +8

    Raytheon is a hell of a company.... People should research more about these machines....

    • @user-zx4vq4uk9c
      @user-zx4vq4uk9c Год назад +8

      The f35 is made by Lockheed Martin?

    • @gamm8939
      @gamm8939 Год назад +3

      Raytheon mostly makes radars and missiles?

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 Год назад +1

      F-35's avionics including its APG-81 radar is from Northrop Grumman. Upcoming AIM-260 JATM is from Lockheed Martin. Older AIM-120 is Raytheon.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 Год назад

      When it comes to missile, I put my thrust on Raytheon more than LM