Truly the VR opens up a brand new frontier in the racing sim world. The immersion is priceless, you have a sense of speed better. I also started enjoying the whole interior design of the car.You can see every detail in the cockpit around you.
Triples = for sim racers (focus on race, data, and ultimate performance) VR = for wannabe sim racers (those who value immersion above performance) For the record i've been both.
I recently had an opportunity to try a very high-end triple set up at a trade show. It was a minimum of $35k. Then I came back to my Fanatec/GT7/PSVR2 setup and honestly I much prefer it. The only thing I want from the high-end set up is the motion now.
VR, by a long shot. A little uncomfortable compared to nothing on your head, but if you're smart, you can reduce that. Saying that you couldn't read dials in a quest 2, shows you just didn't explore settings well enough. Everything in the quest 2 in my racing sims is very clear, all dials easily read (and I have a minimum hardware setup for it). The drawback here is that you have to do a lot of testing and tweaking before you find the magic setup, but once you do, wow! Immersion is underrated. It makes ALL the difference. Seeing depth makes all the difference for me. Once I raced in vr, I knew I would never go back to 2D. It also gives you another aspect that helps, along with ffb, is feeling how the car is moving under you. The movement of the interior in vr gives incredible feedback, as well. Among other things, this helps you to better know when your car is slipping and how well your responses to that grip loss are working. Improves my driving safety and recovery immensely, definitely making me a better driver. Anticipation is vastly better than on any flat screen. So yeah, vr or nothing, for me.
It is incredible. In VR, I was looking at the apex, looking at the curb on exit exactly the same way I would do it in the real world. I think when I'm focused on driving, my brain simply "forgets" that I'm driving in VR.
VR is awesome for immersion, BUT with monitors the graphics are way better and I’m just more consistent. There is also much more immersion when looking at your own hands racing, and having ambient lighting glowing your rig. As much as I love VR, I always feel okay this is cool, but back to monitors. I use Track IR which lets you look into the apex. Just glad as racers we all have options to suit our needs.
@@moncimoov so how is your take on it now? I've a 4070 super with a quest 3 and the amount of tweaking for proper screen is absurd. But even if you set it all up I feel like with my card I'd be way happier with 1080 triples. So I'll prolly opt for a upgrade in the 6x series for triple 1440p's. I might get a new VR then aswell just for fun/immersion, but as a gamer I can't see anybody sacrificing the quality of a actual sharp/clear image with no flickering vs a good clean high peripheral vision triple screen
Mostly race VR now, but I am an immersion freak with the relative pinned high out of normal view so I can check it I want, but doesn't take away the immersion of being in the cockpit. I go back to triples every now and then for long GT3 enduros, but am always happy to be back in VR. If you race open wheel or prototype cars in VR, you will never go back to screens in them.
I have space constraints and from almost 4~5 years ago I went VR with an Oculus CV1, recently upgrade it to a Pimax 5ks; I have stopped enjoying simulator in the screen, when you get use to VR there's no turning back.
Very well said. I went from monitor to vr. The immersion is not comparable but the draw backs you stated are there. Find myself trying to hit buttons and missing them with my headset, but man, that immersion is worth those little things.
I never tried triples because I don't have the space nor I want to fork out the money, but I do have a quest 2 and a quest 3 and a Ultrawide. While using the ultrawide is more comfortable, I enjoy VR so much more! The perception of depth is a game changer when trying to learn a new track. What i found out is that if i try a new track i can get fast and learn a lot quicker in VR, than if i switch back to Ultrawide i can get similar speed. All i can say is that VR is truly the future for SIM racing, and i would bet for gaming in general too... its just a matter of time until the hardware becames so good nobady can ignore it, we are not quite there yet, but i can feel we are getting close since i would not trade my quest3 for a couple more screens...
I just switched to SUW from VR because it’s easier that way. With VR you always have to make some slight adjustments even though it’s said to be just as easy as “hop in and drive”. I’ve been a VR user for a few years and now it is so much easier to just drive when you want to. VR isn’t for me anymore. I don’t say that the immersion wouldn’t be better with VR because it is. That is just awesome. Maybe someday in the future with different tech again. I hope that AR will bring us to another level in gaming with lighter glasses.
I do see why people still prefer triples at this stage, but I prefer VR. But I don't see anyone using triples in the near future for simracing. VR is so much more immersive, you learn tracks faster, it's easier to see where your opponents are which is good for your racecraft, the sense of speed is easier to read. It's easier to be consistent. It's just far more intuitive then triples. I tested this with my dad, I had the Varjo Aero for a week or more and with other headsets he had trouble with the resolution and nausea. But ones he tried a high quality headset he was driving carefully like he would in real life and round by round he was going quicker. He could never do this as quick on triples and he made far more mistakes on triples. VR really is a game changer for simracing.
Triple screens offer sim racers a superior setup with a wide, consistent field of view for enhanced spatial awareness, reduced motion sickness, and greater visual clarity without the enclosed limitations of VR. They are ideal for long sessions and competitive racing. While VR impresses with deep immersion, triple screens provide practicality and performance, making them the preferred choice for those prioritizing functionality, comfort, and a seamless multi-monitor racing experience.
There is an option to have your sim gear appear within the game... programs like reality mixer let's you mix real life footage from the headset tracking cams and the virtual environment.
I have run a large single monitor, triples, and VR. If I could only choose one it would be triples. VR is fun and I still go back to it from time to time. I just get tired of strapping the Reverb G2 to my head for long periods of time. I also like being able to see all my buttons and displays. Theoretically you can be just as fast with either of the three. VR will give you the most situational awareness around the car and a single monitor will provide the least. If VR headsets ever get to where they can provide monitor perfect image quality, run wirelessly for many hours on end, lighter and more comfortable I would consider switching back. But the technology still has a way to go in my opinion. For now, triples provide the best combination of immersion, comfort, and information for me. The downsides as you mentioned are cost and space.
I prefer VR myself. I had an Oculus Rift S for about 6 years. Absolutely loved it. I decided to upgrade to a Varjo Aero when it went on sale. Best upgrade so far. Everything is so clear inside the car. With the Rift S everything was blurry after two car lengths forward, even inside the car. Dials were difficult to read. Not anymore. See you on track.
Vr 100% , or very large projector screen close to the back of the wheel base - 80" screen 85cm away , triple have an odd perspective problem especially where they met, they aren't a consistent distance from your head so this look funny
As someone looking to start sim racing with a very limited amount of space I'm looking very seriously at VR. Unless I can set something up in my loft...
@@ZolalLegend25CFC Quest Pro man, no sweaty face, awsome quality image (good v-card nedded for max resolution), 90hz, and all wireless + VD with H265+ codec (400 Mb/s) - overall great experience in sims
I only race in VR . I can`t see myself using triples or ultrawide monitor. I use a Pico Neo 3 Link and is the best PCVR headset for simracing and the cheapest !
I have been using VR for sime racing since about 2018. I started streaming races about a year and a half ago because my viewer complained about the VR. Now i do a mix of both and like both for different reasons. I guess if I can only pick one I would pick my triples. But I still love racing in VR especially open real cars.
I can't go back to using a Monitor. Just recently switched from the Reverb G2 to the new Meta Quest 3. The Meta Quest 2 was slightly worse then the Reverb G2. The Meta Quest 3 together with the OpenXR Tool, wireless and 120Hz is really impressive. But you have to charge it for longer sessions.
In 2d the imagination is missing. With Tripple I sit in the living room with 3 monitors that I drive around. As if the living room is the car. In VR I sat in the car in 3D and felt like I was on a race track. I'd rather give up my steering wheel and play with the keyboard again than ever go into a race with my living room again.Furthermore, 3 monitors cost significantly more to purchase and the electricity price. It's unbelievable how much space is wasted in the apartment. And all those unnecessary cables...
I also use a Pico4, wired. Immersion is great but the clarity and contrast is just not there yet. My 48" 4K OLED surpasses the Pico4 in image quality by miles, no contest. The Mpeg artifacts over the USB connection handycaps the image quality greatly, sadly. Therefore I'm looking at the Quest Pro, where you can turn the decoding up to 960mbs, instead of the 150mbs from Pico. Or the Quest3 with 200mbs AV1 and 10bit colors but the Q3 is still front heavy.
as a vr user after hp reverb g2 jumped to quest 3. Pancake lenses are wonderful. i agree; triple monitor must be more comfortable but nothing can give immersion what vr gives i think. Only need Open Composite and OpenXR Toolkit.
I have the Reverb G2 and bought new only 3 months ago .Was thinking and wondering whether to switch to Q3, is it that much better quality ?? I want to see the track in the distance in a higher quality and also the apex in better detail??
@@chrishart5474 when you look forward there is no big jump, but seeing everything clear just looking that side without turning your head is wonderful. And if you have nice wireless setup like 6e, wireless connection is great without loosing any details.
@@chrishart5474 Pancake lenses with Q3 resolution gives you clear image from edge to edge, so yeah, it will be game changer upgrade from G2 to Q3, but dont forget crunk up resolution to max in meta quest programm on PC
For me, its VR - mainly for the depth perception and that sth thats steep, actually looks steep and gives me a better feel for the car and its potential behavior.
Quest 3 here. FOV and resolution is not up to par imo. It's also quite uncomfortable and it seems like many layers of setup to just play a game. Some games i still havn't gotten it working (all wireless).
I thought about Triple screens a while back, but the immersion of VR is much much better than staring at distant display screens. Plus VR headset takes up no room needed. Been doing VR for quite a while and really enjoy it. We are actually sitting in the cockpit with VR, not with display screens. Display screens do look cool when setup right, but that is about all they do. I do have just a single screen to do PC Windows stuff when not gaming. End of story.
Same thoughts. After getting rid of the extra monitors, I just put the cockpit next to my desk with one monitor sitting on it for non-cockpit games. Very simple and clean, love it.
I’ve tried multiple triple screens but the immersion of the sim fell short compared to my setup. Vr Hp Reverb, open wheeler race seat with hf8 haptic seat, bass shakers (L) (R) and (1) bass shaker on pedal base
Hardware specs are something to consider when opt for a VR setup. Ive own a 12400 i5 with RTX 3060, and can somehow get a decent fps with a lot of tweaking involved to sacrifice graphics over fps, because in VR. Ur really wanna focus on resolution first graphic second in terms of visual. In VR setup I dont really mind graphics because resolution tank the most in fps. You really wanna at least maximize the potential of the VR headset native resolution to be able to see properly. Or else you might see some jagged edges that are quite disturbing during racing. I never own a 3 monitor setup so I have no idea how badly the graphic card will tank your fps compare to vr. I intrigued to know which setup require more hardware performance
I prefer VR always, but it does affect you with fatigue and potential motion sickness after a while. Honestly its the only drawback for me, but this is solved with 15 minute breaks out of the headset between races
A very important consideration.... game compatibility. Its pretty sad game capability for VR on PC is so spotty. Many more games support triple monitors.
I think big screen beyond is a game changer for VR and got rid of all the heaviness of a headset. I have triple screens for some games or just to change it up but an open wheeled car is hard to beat in vr
My only problem with VR is the discomfort in the face and how I lose my surroundings. I thought it would make me nauseous before I tried it, but in sim racing it fortunately never did. And everything else is actually more practical than triples, which turned my room into a mess when I had them for my setup.
Discomfort is definitely the biggest setback. On Pico 4 the battery is placed in the back which helps balance the weight. Still heavier than the PSVR2 but probably one of the best out there in terms of comfort.
Im in that point right now. I use my reverb G2 on Assetto corsa and sometimes IS a pain in the ass... And sometimes u dont play in summer besause of the sweat. So im thinking about yo change my setup and buy a Samsung g9 57". And dont really know what to do!
I went from triples to vr for space, it's great but it's just too uncomfortable especially in the hotter months. Also you need a monster gpu, even my 7900xtx can't make vr look as crisp as 3x 1440p at a good framerate, for this reason I'd choose triples over VR for anything more than casual races.
Yeah this is the con of VR you need a seriously good pc. I like what they did with the Varjo Aero, you have an automatic fan which always keep the headset cool.
good ppl speak about this, I've a 4070 super and it's definitely not enough for a good image. You'll spend legit a hundred hours of tweaking just to get something that's "acceptable" at best (quest 3 here)
VR is great for immersion however I found that I was slower in VR than on a screen. I think the movement distract from what matters like hitting the same braking spot.
I have the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 ($2400 two years ago), and a Quest 2 ($400 one year ago).. I prefer the Quest 2 even though the graphics are terrible compared the to the G9.. The immersion is just so worth it
I have the Q3 and triple 27" I find if I wanna lock in and do short style races on my motion platform the immersion is incomparable. But if I want a longer lap intense race and be able to pay attention to my real world (the wife) 😂 monitors are my go too. I find also it's much easier with my 4th screen to trail brake and notice the other drivers on the inside blind spots
I think the concept makes total sense - building a device dedicated for tether use and remove all unnecessary components. I just don't think the current headset bothers me enough to justify the price tag. I won't be too surprised if another company come up with a similar minimum headset at a much lower price point.
I choose VR every single time over monitors but its not for everyone. Some people can't handle VR and some can't deal with it for prolonged periods of time. I went from triples to VR and never looked back. There are definite drawbacks though, visual fidelity being one of them, you need to have a pretty beefy system to get the best VR experience for sure, since you are essentially in some cases running dual 4k monitors at 90hz and some of the newer headsets even more. So if you have a system that can barely push one 4k monitor at 90hz, VR will not be a good experience for you. I have been running a HP Reverb G2 now for 3 years and I still find it hard to upgrade it I think its the best bang for your buck VR headset for Simracing especially. The field of view is not the greatest but most of the headsets arent and the ones that are you give up things somewhere else like weight/size/price etc...
I use Quest 2 with 2x resolution and decreased vertical fove. Which gives you more productivity. In iracing everything is almost as clear as it becomes on the monitor.
Do you always race in ACC using VR? If yes then what's your pc specs and what's the app you use to connect to your pc. For the life of my i cannot drive in ACC in VR, it just looks terrible and the fps are not great even though i have a 4080, I've tried many sims like iRacing ac and ams2 and the VR in those sims are very good.
I have 3080Ti and run the game through steam VR. The connection is done with Pico's own app, I believe it's called Pico connect. I don't have other games to compare to though.
VR is more fun but it’s more faff and I don’t improve when using it. Triples are just nice and convenient. Single is enough to be fast, even irl you don’t look at the car too much, you know where they “should be” and if they aren’t most of the time a wider fov just means you have a better view of your impending doom.
The one and only reason/ bennefit of VR is a real 3D Image with depth. No 3 ,5 or 20 screen setup can you give this. You can better estimate distances to your opponents, braking points and cornering.
Now get rid of the static rig and get a motion sim, like the yaw2. It’s like jumping another 10 fold of immersion. It’s as close to real life racing and your life won’t be the same again.
VR is way better for immersion (I have a Pimax Crystal, after an Reverb G2 for 2 years) The only downside I can say is, that it's difficult to hit buttons e.g. on a buttonbox while in VR. Apart from that: VR all day long!
triple monitor. my quest 2 is too uncomfortable and makes me sick after 1 hour. you also need to have a waaay more powerful pc to make things look as pretty as in triples
I never understood people who said vr is not comftable meanwhile playing a racing simulator. If you want to copy the real thing, then why don’t you copy the feel of the helmet? If comfort that metter, why do you use dd wheel base and fight back with the force feedback, why don’t you just sit in your sofa with a controller in your hand? Is your vr almost 1kg? Maybe train your neck. Is the headset swety in a hot summer day? Well, in f1 it’s usual to lose 4-5kb weight because of swet.. this is why racing is sport because they are not just sitting in their cars (the drivers) but also training different muscles
Ha, that's an interesting perspective. I'd argue that (if I have to) a helmet is more comfortable when fitted right as it does not create any pressure points in your face 😆
definitely VR. I have the quest three, but it looks about 1080p. I’m moving onto the Bigscreen VR, which is much much lighter with much higher resolution. The only problem with that instead it cost three times as much Once you buy the hand controllers and head tracking cubes.
I got it with the GT Omega rig, but it looks like they don't have this model anymore. I think it's just an off-the-shelf keyboard try with swivel arm. You should be able to find it elsewhere.
i never see comments on the graphic pixelation as you look further down the road as you are supposed to in race driving, also unexpected loops, reverses or even drifting sometimes give me extreme nausia from the lack of g forces, that being said have done back to back sessions on a dbox motion rig with moza wheel, fanatec shifter and husquefeld? pedals and after running vr for 45 minutes on laguna seca a track i know inside out in sim and real life i could not keep it on the track with 3 screen, my point is the driving style due to immersiveness is affected and therefore really makes me question the ease of use of sims for real driving, great for memorization, practicing race craft or having fun but compared to a real car worries me that developing bad habits in muscle memory could create issues in real life. Still is better to practice than not end of day. thanks for the opinion video
Motion sickness, extreme stress on eyes, sweaty brow.. no thanks! It seems cool until you realize you are using multiple programs and dealing with all types of different setup screens and binds for just the game you are playing now you have to incorporate a VR headset into it as well. You are moving keyboards and mouse and your regular headset around to make room to put the controllers you don't need to race but need to startup the VR etc. Its a mess and nobody ever mentions that. If you just want to sit down and race, avoid the VR, if you want to make just as much effort and prep time getting into your sim rig as you would crawling into an actual race car with roll cage and harness then go VR.
I wouldn’t say this is completely true. Coming from someone who has always gotten motion sick very easily and has to take dramamine before playing first person shooters in VR. - I can play racing games in VR for hours with no motion sickness, no uncomfortable and no strain. In terms of sweating, i just out a fan on me and it’s fine. Quest 3 is very good! 👍
Truly the VR opens up a brand new frontier in the racing sim world.
The immersion is priceless, you have a sense of speed better.
I also started enjoying the whole interior design of the car.You can see every detail in the cockpit around you.
Triples == playing a game. VR == driving a car
Yes,VR you are in the game
Love this comment.
True but I have my Vr gor 2 years and I think I would hace played more if I have had a triple.
@@elsocesoy01 What give?
Triples = for sim racers (focus on race, data, and ultimate performance)
VR = for wannabe sim racers (those who value immersion above performance)
For the record i've been both.
I recently had an opportunity to try a very high-end triple set up at a trade show. It was a minimum of $35k.
Then I came back to my Fanatec/GT7/PSVR2 setup and honestly I much prefer it. The only thing I want from the high-end set up is the motion now.
VR with GT7 - love to see the realistic elevation on tracks- that’s priceless
VR, by a long shot. A little uncomfortable compared to nothing on your head, but if you're smart, you can reduce that. Saying that you couldn't read dials in a quest 2, shows you just didn't explore settings well enough. Everything in the quest 2 in my racing sims is very clear, all dials easily read (and I have a minimum hardware setup for it). The drawback here is that you have to do a lot of testing and tweaking before you find the magic setup, but once you do, wow!
Immersion is underrated. It makes ALL the difference. Seeing depth makes all the difference for me. Once I raced in vr, I knew I would never go back to 2D. It also gives you another aspect that helps, along with ffb, is feeling how the car is moving under you. The movement of the interior in vr gives incredible feedback, as well. Among other things, this helps you to better know when your car is slipping and how well your responses to that grip loss are working. Improves my driving safety and recovery immensely, definitely making me a better driver. Anticipation is vastly better than on any flat screen.
So yeah, vr or nothing, for me.
It is incredible. In VR, I was looking at the apex, looking at the curb on exit exactly the same way I would do it in the real world. I think when I'm focused on driving, my brain simply "forgets" that I'm driving in VR.
I remember my first week in vr
Well said very true
@@bp4861right 🤣 everyone I've raced in vr is slow
VR is life
Playing in VR is more immersive. But for me playing on a screen is a bit easier and less demanding doing longer races. Sini do a bit of both. 😊
VR is awesome for immersion, BUT with monitors the graphics are way better and I’m just more consistent. There is also much more immersion when looking at your own hands racing, and having ambient lighting glowing your rig. As much as I love VR, I always feel okay this is cool, but back to monitors. I use Track IR which lets you look into the apex.
Just glad as racers we all have options to suit our needs.
@@Username_Invalidwhich is why im buying Bigscreen Beyond and upgraded to 4080
@@moncimoov so how is your take on it now? I've a 4070 super with a quest 3 and the amount of tweaking for proper screen is absurd. But even if you set it all up I feel like with my card I'd be way happier with 1080 triples. So I'll prolly opt for a upgrade in the 6x series for triple 1440p's. I might get a new VR then aswell just for fun/immersion, but as a gamer I can't see anybody sacrificing the quality of a actual sharp/clear image with no flickering vs a good clean high peripheral vision triple screen
@@Bankai90 with bigscreen beyond and 4080, i dont wanna go back to my 65 4K Micro Led TV. . not even triple screen
its just that good
Mostly race VR now, but I am an immersion freak with the relative pinned high out of normal view so I can check it I want, but doesn't take away the immersion of being in the cockpit. I go back to triples every now and then for long GT3 enduros, but am always happy to be back in VR. If you race open wheel or prototype cars in VR, you will never go back to screens in them.
I have space constraints and from almost 4~5 years ago I went VR with an Oculus CV1, recently upgrade it to a Pimax 5ks; I have stopped enjoying simulator in the screen, when you get use to VR there's no turning back.
2 months ago i went from triple screen setup to Quest 3 and it was the best thing i've done.
Very well said. I went from monitor to vr. The immersion is not comparable but the draw backs you stated are there. Find myself trying to hit buttons and missing them with my headset, but man, that immersion is worth those little things.
I never tried triples because I don't have the space nor I want to fork out the money, but I do have a quest 2 and a quest 3 and a Ultrawide. While using the ultrawide is more comfortable, I enjoy VR so much more! The perception of depth is a game changer when trying to learn a new track. What i found out is that if i try a new track i can get fast and learn a lot quicker in VR, than if i switch back to Ultrawide i can get similar speed. All i can say is that VR is truly the future for SIM racing, and i would bet for gaming in general too... its just a matter of time until the hardware becames so good nobady can ignore it, we are not quite there yet, but i can feel we are getting close since i would not trade my quest3 for a couple more screens...
Almost all of my best lap times have been posted in VR. The sense of depth you get in VR helps tremendously with judging speed and distance.
I just switched to SUW from VR because it’s easier that way. With VR you always have to make some slight adjustments even though it’s said to be just as easy as “hop in and drive”.
I’ve been a VR user for a few years and now it is so much easier to just drive when you want to. VR isn’t for me anymore.
I don’t say that the immersion wouldn’t be better with VR because it is. That is just awesome. Maybe someday in the future with different tech again. I hope that AR will bring us to another level in gaming with lighter glasses.
VR with the new Meta 3. The pancake lenses are great and the solution is awesome for this price range!! I dont want to switch Back :)
Same, the clarity is surprising right?! , barely any screen door effect.
What about the 57” ultrawide Samsung monitor ? No bezels, no hassle,…
I do see why people still prefer triples at this stage, but I prefer VR.
But I don't see anyone using triples in the near future for simracing. VR is so much more immersive, you learn tracks faster, it's easier to see where your opponents are which is good for your racecraft, the sense of speed is easier to read. It's easier to be consistent. It's just far more intuitive then triples.
I tested this with my dad, I had the Varjo Aero for a week or more and with other headsets he had trouble with the resolution and nausea. But ones he tried a high quality headset he was driving carefully like he would in real life and round by round he was going quicker. He could never do this as quick on triples and he made far more mistakes on triples.
VR really is a game changer for simracing.
Agree. I was almost instantly a second faster switching to Vr. I am also much more consistent.
Triple screens offer sim racers a superior setup with a wide, consistent field of view for enhanced spatial awareness, reduced motion sickness, and greater visual clarity without the enclosed limitations of VR. They are ideal for long sessions and competitive racing. While VR impresses with deep immersion, triple screens provide practicality and performance, making them the preferred choice for those prioritizing functionality, comfort, and a seamless multi-monitor racing experience.
Chat got ahh comment
The stereo focal depth that VR adds really ups the experience for me. The new MQ3 resolution is getting close to the graphic detail needed.
There is an option to have your sim gear appear within the game... programs like reality mixer let's you mix real life footage from the headset tracking cams and the virtual environment.
With the passtrough cameras from the VR Headset Like Quest 3 or Pro
This is from my setup ruclips.net/user/shortsYSod70NKjJA (just too hot for VR at the moment).
I have both and mainly comfort when it's too hot drives me back to triples.
I have run a large single monitor, triples, and VR. If I could only choose one it would be triples. VR is fun and I still go back to it from time to time. I just get tired of strapping the Reverb G2 to my head for long periods of time. I also like being able to see all my buttons and displays. Theoretically you can be just as fast with either of the three. VR will give you the most situational awareness around the car and a single monitor will provide the least.
If VR headsets ever get to where they can provide monitor perfect image quality, run wirelessly for many hours on end, lighter and more comfortable I would consider switching back. But the technology still has a way to go in my opinion. For now, triples provide the best combination of immersion, comfort, and information for me. The downsides as you mentioned are cost and space.
VR always worth a try, cheaper than 3 monitors
i love both VR and 55” triples. depends on the itch which one to use.
Nice! If I were to get triples again I'd definitely go with something bigger.
I prefer VR myself. I had an Oculus Rift S for about 6 years. Absolutely loved it. I decided to upgrade to a Varjo Aero when it went on sale. Best upgrade so far. Everything is so clear inside the car. With the Rift S everything was blurry after two car lengths forward, even inside the car. Dials were difficult to read. Not anymore. See you on track.
Vr 100% , or very large projector screen close to the back of the wheel base - 80" screen 85cm away , triple have an odd perspective problem especially where they met, they aren't a consistent distance from your head so this look funny
As someone looking to start sim racing with a very limited amount of space I'm looking very seriously at VR. Unless I can set something up in my loft...
Just started Sim Racing and went VR to save space! I also play on a single 4K 55' oled television when I want to jump right in for a quick spin.
Rite it's all about compromise, The VR and race simulator with haptics, does me just fine.
I use Reverb G2, RTX4080, and Moza R9 V2 as my experience
HP Reverb G2 all day over triples. One thing I would like to maybe mention is that with a Bigscreen Beyond the comfort issue is completely gone.
75hz tho. And I believe the gasket gets sweaty easily
@@ZolalLegend25CFC Quest Pro man, no sweaty face, awsome quality image (good v-card nedded for max resolution), 90hz, and all wireless + VD with H265+ codec (400 Mb/s) - overall great experience in sims
I only race in VR . I can`t see myself using triples or ultrawide monitor. I use a Pico Neo 3 Link and is the best PCVR headset for simracing and the cheapest !
VR for life
I have been using VR for sime racing since about 2018. I started streaming races about a year and a half ago because my viewer complained about the VR. Now i do a mix of both and like both for different reasons. I guess if I can only pick one I would pick my triples. But I still love racing in VR especially open real cars.
I can't go back to using a Monitor. Just recently switched from the Reverb G2 to the new Meta Quest 3. The Meta Quest 2 was slightly worse then the Reverb G2. The Meta Quest 3 together with the OpenXR Tool, wireless and 120Hz is really impressive. But you have to charge it for longer sessions.
In 2d the imagination is missing. With Tripple I sit in the living room with 3 monitors that I drive around. As if the living room is the car. In VR I sat in the car in 3D and felt like I was on a race track. I'd rather give up my steering wheel and play with the keyboard again than ever go into a race with my living room again.Furthermore, 3 monitors cost significantly more to purchase and the electricity price. It's unbelievable how much space is wasted in the apartment. And all those unnecessary cables...
I also use a Pico4, wired. Immersion is great but the clarity and contrast is just not there yet. My 48" 4K OLED surpasses the Pico4 in image quality by miles, no contest. The Mpeg artifacts over the USB connection handycaps the image quality greatly, sadly. Therefore I'm looking at the Quest Pro, where you can turn the decoding up to 960mbs, instead of the 150mbs from Pico. Or the Quest3 with 200mbs AV1 and 10bit colors but the Q3 is still front heavy.
Im very intrested of pico5 wich should be released 2024
Quest 3 is best value currently. I have both headsets.
as a vr user after hp reverb g2 jumped to quest 3. Pancake lenses are wonderful. i agree; triple monitor must be more comfortable but nothing can give immersion what vr gives i think. Only need Open Composite and OpenXR Toolkit.
I have the Reverb G2 and bought new only 3 months ago .Was thinking and wondering whether to switch to Q3, is it that much better quality ?? I want to see the track in the distance in a higher quality and also the apex in better detail??
@@chrishart5474 when you look forward there is no big jump, but seeing everything clear just looking that side without turning your head is wonderful. And if you have nice wireless setup like 6e, wireless connection is great without loosing any details.
@@chrishart5474 Pancake lenses with Q3 resolution gives you clear image from edge to edge, so yeah, it will be game changer upgrade from G2 to Q3, but dont forget crunk up resolution to max in meta quest programm on PC
For me, its VR - mainly for the depth perception and that sth thats steep, actually looks steep and gives me a better feel for the car and its potential behavior.
VR all Day
I went triple since those vr headsets hurt my neck
Quest 3 here. FOV and resolution is not up to par imo. It's also quite uncomfortable and it seems like many layers of setup to just play a game. Some games i still havn't gotten it working (all wireless).
I thought about Triple screens a while back, but the immersion of VR is much much better than staring at distant display screens. Plus VR headset takes up no room needed. Been doing VR for quite a while and really enjoy it. We are actually sitting in the cockpit with VR, not with display screens. Display screens do look cool when setup right, but that is about all they do.
I do have just a single screen to do PC Windows stuff when not gaming.
End of story.
Same thoughts. After getting rid of the extra monitors, I just put the cockpit next to my desk with one monitor sitting on it for non-cockpit games. Very simple and clean, love it.
@@TrackRabbitSimRacing Thanks for your added info reply. take care.
I’ve tried multiple triple screens but the immersion of the sim fell short compared to my setup. Vr Hp Reverb, open wheeler race seat with hf8 haptic seat, bass shakers (L) (R) and (1) bass shaker on pedal base
Nice! I'm looking forward to try open wheel race in GT7 once my PS compatible wheelbase shows up.
yey - but the comfort level is very awesome on the pico. 400+ gramms
the lighter from a 500g standpoint - the very lighter it feels
It's indeed a leap forward compared to the quest 2
Hardware specs are something to consider when opt for a VR setup. Ive own a 12400 i5 with RTX 3060, and can somehow get a decent fps with a lot of tweaking involved to sacrifice graphics over fps, because in VR. Ur really wanna focus on resolution first graphic second in terms of visual. In VR setup I dont really mind graphics because resolution tank the most in fps. You really wanna at least maximize the potential of the VR headset native resolution to be able to see properly. Or else you might see some jagged edges that are quite disturbing during racing.
I never own a 3 monitor setup so I have no idea how badly the graphic card will tank your fps compare to vr. I intrigued to know which setup require more hardware performance
welcome to the world of VR my friend.
I prefer VR always, but it does affect you with fatigue and potential motion sickness after a while. Honestly its the only drawback for me, but this is solved with 15 minute breaks out of the headset between races
I feel lucky that I don't have a motion sickness problem. But I'm really curious if one could build up tolerance against it.
I have had the pico 4 for almost a year, and the thing is perfect, way more comfortable than the Quest 2
Agree! I really like how they placed the battery in the back to balance the weight. Seems pretty intuitive but somehow no one else copied that idea.
A very important consideration.... game compatibility.
Its pretty sad game capability for VR on PC is so spotty. Many more games support triple monitors.
I think big screen beyond is a game changer for VR and got rid of all the heaviness of a headset. I have triple screens for some games or just to change it up but an open wheeled car is hard to beat in vr
My only problem with VR is the discomfort in the face and how I lose my surroundings. I thought it would make me nauseous before I tried it, but in sim racing it fortunately never did. And everything else is actually more practical than triples, which turned my room into a mess when I had them for my setup.
Discomfort is definitely the biggest setback. On Pico 4 the battery is placed in the back which helps balance the weight. Still heavier than the PSVR2 but probably one of the best out there in terms of comfort.
I really don't get why people would go back from VR for sims, I mean, driving a race car wasn't even meant to be comfortable :D
Im in that point right now. I use my reverb G2 on Assetto corsa and sometimes IS a pain in the ass... And sometimes u dont play in summer besause of the sweat. So im thinking about yo change my setup and buy a Samsung g9 57". And dont really know what to do!
To make money streaming
I went from triples to vr for space, it's great but it's just too uncomfortable especially in the hotter months. Also you need a monster gpu, even my 7900xtx can't make vr look as crisp as 3x 1440p at a good framerate, for this reason I'd choose triples over VR for anything more than casual races.
Yeah this is the con of VR you need a seriously good pc. I like what they did with the Varjo Aero, you have an automatic fan which always keep the headset cool.
good ppl speak about this, I've a 4070 super and it's definitely not enough for a good image. You'll spend legit a hundred hours of tweaking just to get something that's "acceptable" at best (quest 3 here)
VR is great for immersion however I found that I was slower in VR than on a screen. I think the movement distract from what matters like hitting the same braking spot.
I use both however staying cool when using my VR headset has been challenging so I mainly stick to triple monitors.
VR, if you get hot in a race, buy a fan and point it at yourself
I have the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 ($2400 two years ago), and a Quest 2 ($400 one year ago).. I prefer the Quest 2 even though the graphics are terrible compared the to the G9.. The immersion is just so worth it
Triple for daily use and longer use, VR as a nice2have addon
I have the Q3 and triple 27" I find if I wanna lock in and do short style races on my motion platform the immersion is incomparable. But if I want a longer lap intense race and be able to pay attention to my real world (the wife) 😂 monitors are my go too. I find also it's much easier with my 4th screen to trail brake and notice the other drivers on the inside blind spots
VR is amazing and addictive.
VR here...
vr
Have you heard of the big screen beyond? It's about the size of the pico controllers, yet has 2560 x 2560 resolution per eye.
I think the concept makes total sense - building a device dedicated for tether use and remove all unnecessary components. I just don't think the current headset bothers me enough to justify the price tag. I won't be too surprised if another company come up with a similar minimum headset at a much lower price point.
BSB is highly overpriced
What are your PC specs and can you run ACC in VR?
I choose VR every single time over monitors but its not for everyone. Some people can't handle VR and some can't deal with it for prolonged periods of time. I went from triples to VR and never looked back. There are definite drawbacks though, visual fidelity being one of them, you need to have a pretty beefy system to get the best VR experience for sure, since you are essentially in some cases running dual 4k monitors at 90hz and some of the newer headsets even more. So if you have a system that can barely push one 4k monitor at 90hz, VR will not be a good experience for you. I have been running a HP Reverb G2 now for 3 years and I still find it hard to upgrade it I think its the best bang for your buck VR headset for Simracing especially. The field of view is not the greatest but most of the headsets arent and the ones that are you give up things somewhere else like weight/size/price etc...
A triple monitor setup requires a pretty powerful pc. You can run vr with less of a performance requirement, but vr still requires a good pc
very clear info, thanks bro
The depth of field with VR makes it impossible to go back to pancake racing.
Now we just need higher quality headsets that are much lighter.
I use Quest 2 with 2x resolution and decreased vertical fove. Which gives you more productivity. In iracing everything is almost as clear as it becomes on the monitor.
I just got a quest 3 , i had the quest 2 and is a huge leap ! If you enjoy it with quest 2 consider the upgrade, totally worth it!
Do you always race in ACC using VR? If yes then what's your pc specs and what's the app you use to connect to your pc. For the life of my i cannot drive in ACC in VR, it just looks terrible and the fps are not great even though i have a 4080, I've tried many sims like iRacing ac and ams2 and the VR in those sims are very good.
I have 3080Ti and run the game through steam VR. The connection is done with Pico's own app, I believe it's called Pico connect. I don't have other games to compare to though.
VR is more fun but it’s more faff and I don’t improve when using it. Triples are just nice and convenient.
Single is enough to be fast, even irl you don’t look at the car too much, you know where they “should be” and if they aren’t most of the time a wider fov just means you have a better view of your impending doom.
The one and only reason/ bennefit of VR is a real 3D Image with depth. No 3 ,5 or 20 screen setup can you give this.
You can better estimate distances to your opponents, braking points and cornering.
Now get rid of the static rig and get a motion sim, like the yaw2. It’s like jumping another 10 fold of immersion. It’s as close to real life racing and your life won’t be the same again.
I've been thinking of going the other way. Have 4090 g2.
i wanna buy vr, my channel is rather small and with me not having a stable income ,vr is my only hope for now
Triple what? 32 or 27”?
32"
Are you running 27" or 32" monitors? I did search around your channel a bit but I didn't see the info.
Those are 32" monitors. I wouldn't recommend going smaller for a sim racing setup.
Which monitor would you get ? Im currently shopping as i sold my va panels
I had 32" QHD monitors, if I were to do it again i'll get something even bigger.
Mixed reality is the future
VR!
VR is way better for immersion (I have a Pimax Crystal, after an Reverb G2 for 2 years)
The only downside I can say is, that it's difficult to hit buttons e.g. on a buttonbox while in VR.
Apart from that: VR all day long!
I used Mixed Reality with my Quest Pro,so i can see my real Steering Wheel and my Shifterbox in the game
Once you learn all the buttons on your wheel is easy.
@@HDRGamingHub Yes on the wheel it's easy, but if you have a separate buttonbox it's something else 😉
Haha this is my biggest pain point with Flight sim. The visual is incredible in VR, but trying to find all the buttons...
What size triples do you have?
I had 32". They worked fine but if I were to ever get a triple setup again, I'd definitely go with something bigger.
@@TrackRabbitSimRacing good to know. I have been back and forth the last few weeks and been thinking going 43s
VR for me, but still have my triples for productivity.
triple monitor. my quest 2 is too uncomfortable and makes me sick after 1 hour. you also need to have a waaay more powerful pc to make things look as pretty as in triples
I never understood people who said vr is not comftable meanwhile playing a racing simulator. If you want to copy the real thing, then why don’t you copy the feel of the helmet? If comfort that metter, why do you use dd wheel base and fight back with the force feedback, why don’t you just sit in your sofa with a controller in your hand? Is your vr almost 1kg? Maybe train your neck. Is the headset swety in a hot summer day? Well, in f1 it’s usual to lose 4-5kb weight because of swet.. this is why racing is sport because they are not just sitting in their cars (the drivers) but also training different muscles
Ha, that's an interesting perspective. I'd argue that (if I have to) a helmet is more comfortable when fitted right as it does not create any pressure points in your face 😆
With a pimax crystal vr is amazing but expensive and you need a beast of pc. In a race you forget wearing it..
What monitors are those? Been looking for something big with a high refresh rate.
Those are 32" QHD LG monitors, 165Hz refresh rate. They are decent but honestly I would prefer something even larger.
I really wanna use my pico 4 but getting racing games to look good 5 meters ahead of you is neigh impossible
It worked fine for me. Did you get the settings right?
Hands down, VR.
I can read all the stuff with my quest 2, and it runs acc at 120fps
definitely VR. I have the quest three, but it looks about 1080p. I’m moving onto the Bigscreen VR, which is much much lighter with much higher resolution. The only problem with that instead it cost three times as much Once you buy the hand controllers and head tracking cubes.
First of all,
You should use Virtual desktop with pico 4 coz with the cable the quality is -%70 .
Umm interesting.. I'll give it a try.
Big Screen Beyond VR headset is best for simracing and flight sim. IMO
What keyboard tray is that?
I got it with the GT Omega rig, but it looks like they don't have this model anymore. I think it's just an off-the-shelf keyboard try with swivel arm. You should be able to find it elsewhere.
i never see comments on the graphic pixelation as you look further down the road as you are supposed to in race driving, also unexpected loops, reverses or even drifting sometimes give me extreme nausia from the lack of g forces, that being said have done back to back sessions on a dbox motion rig with moza wheel, fanatec shifter and husquefeld? pedals and after running vr for 45 minutes on laguna seca a track i know inside out in sim and real life i could not keep it on the track with 3 screen, my point is the driving style due to immersiveness is affected and therefore really makes me question the ease of use of sims for real driving, great for memorization, practicing race craft or having fun but compared to a real car worries me that developing bad habits in muscle memory could create issues in real life. Still is better to practice than not end of day. thanks for the opinion video
Bigscreen Beyond VR headset
Motion sickness, extreme stress on eyes, sweaty brow.. no thanks! It seems cool until you realize you are using multiple programs and dealing with all types of different setup screens and binds for just the game you are playing now you have to incorporate a VR headset into it as well. You are moving keyboards and mouse and your regular headset around to make room to put the controllers you don't need to race but need to startup the VR etc. Its a mess and nobody ever mentions that. If you just want to sit down and race, avoid the VR, if you want to make just as much effort and prep time getting into your sim rig as you would crawling into an actual race car with roll cage and harness then go VR.
I wouldn’t say this is completely true. Coming from someone who has always gotten motion sick very easily and has to take dramamine before playing first person shooters in VR. - I can play racing games in VR for hours with no motion sickness, no uncomfortable and no strain. In terms of sweating, i just out a fan on me and it’s fine. Quest 3 is very good! 👍
Ok, you got me.
I have the quest 3 i tried to play with that and the immersive its amazing also I feel sick very soon with vomit 🤢
2D newer be so immersive like 3D 360
Got me thinking 🤔