@@darrello9478 If all mankind was wiped out apart from Noah and his family on the ark, surely all of these civilisations around the World would not have survived to have recorded a global flood. And maybe more importantly, why are there also civilisations around the World that kept detailed records at the time the flood was supposed to have happened but make absolutely no mention of a global flood? Perhaps because a global flood never happened?
Some folks here might know what mudloggers do, they look at the drill cuttings that come to the surface while drilling oil wells, so that you know what formation you're drilling through, and especially when you've entered the reservoir. I did it for a while. I remember logging a well on the Bruce reservoir and for some reason we were doing this almost from the sea surface. And at about 1000 ft below the sea surface we drilling through... shell debris, not fossilized, it still had an iridescent sheen. And thinking to myself, "well that certainly didn't get laid down 10 million years ago!".
Colin Macdonald, well that was interesting! I was so interested to see a few years ago, our oil exploration Sounding teams found Water Rock deep, deep underground. It is mentioned a couple times in scripture and would always confuse me about how that can be, whenever I read it. If true it would explain how God removed the flood over mountains. Sooo the discovery team believes releasing pressure will melt it back to liquid. Earthquakes, Meteors?
@@charlanpennington3989 Well, you'll find brine in practically every oil reservoir. Worth bearing in mind that not only is the Earth mostly covered in ocean but it's also generally over 4000m deep but the land is mostly less than 1000m high. We're still kind of flooded.
@@colinmacdonald5732 , well that kind of slapped me awake. I never think of us as still flooded. So, what about the little plants that produced all the oil. How did that happen? In simple language please.
@@charlanpennington3989 Hydrocarbons come from sea creatures not plants. You get coal from plants. AFAIK apply enough preasure and heat to a tub of shellfish you'll get crude oil, the carbon and the hydrogen are there already. Don't ask me to explain the chemistry behind this!
@@colinmacdonald5732 , thankyou, finally something that makes sense. Could the shiny shell fish have been old without receiving the required pressure? Like having the leading edge of a plate dive under but the portion that didn't dive yet, be low pressure still? Or more likely tsunami carried inland and mud debris placed over top, not too thick? PS. Thankyou for this education.
" Repent is the START ....... " Repent simply means ; rethought , rethink , with great anguishing in despair , change of mind ... until you " REPENT " you will not turn any direction , you will only continue in and on your current way . MARANATHA ....... The Repent Guy
Huge oyster beds could not be created in less than a year. Sorry, but your apologists are wrong on this example. This is a prime example of plate tectonics.
Many of us know of these things, however you chronicalized it all and exposed it in greater detail with lots of other "nuggets" of information. It's amazing how God informs His people through His Holy Spirit about His doings, past, present and future. Keep faith and stay encouraged brethren. Maranatha!
You have accepted a completely disproven theory. Until you can disprove Radiometric Dating (the foundation for physics and chemistry) how can you say this is correct?
@Mark Duffield people aren't satisfied with one answer, they need others to fill in the blank. im with you, i don't doubt God's word, if he says the earth was flooded at one point i have to take him at his word. none of us were around when Jesus was born, yet the scriptures give us the history of that period in 4 different accounts of the gospels. Romans did record the time Pontius was governor, however by the time the Romans converted to Christianity in 300AD, they began to distance themselves from there old history. then when Catholicsm was founded in 400AD, the Emperor of Rome tried to erase some things from history, but archeologist always are the one's that keep history alive.
@@Decoder2040 And its going to happen again quite soon; loking where all those bones are deposited and the vast amount of coal reinforces his video last night 1/25/23
Scientifically vacuous nonsense. The most common process of fossilization happens when an animal is buried by sediment, such as sand or silt, shortly after it dies. Its bones are protected from rotting by layers of sediment. As its body decomposes all the fleshy parts wear away and only the hard parts, like bones, teeth, and horns, are left behind. Over millions of years, water in the nearby rocks surrounds these hard parts, and minerals in the water replace them, bit by bit. When the minerals have completely replaced the organic tissue, what's left is a solid rock copy of the original specimen.
@@estebanleacho9315 that’s a lie, there has never been a dinosaur found with preserved DNA or cells, and the bones are preserved with layers of rock, that’s why they’re fossils and not bones, jeez y’all are so dumb.
Thank you for this; I learned quite a bit. This will necessitate me re-examining the Hydroplate Theory which until now I had always considered 'water-tight'. It was the part mentioning cooler areas lower in the mantle that really got my attention; I don't think the HP can account for that.
Have your considered the fact that the ocean floor has thousands of fracture zones that follow the mid ocean ridges and emanate from that Catastrophic Scar perpendicular to that scar and many of those fractures run from shore to shore, continent to continent and are caused by fact that the earth is a globe, not a cylinder and therefore as the major fracture of the scar traveled around the earth, it also fractured out from the main fracture to relieve the pressure laterally. There is zero evidence of those fracture zones being deformed, or subsequently disfigured. Also, if the crust had been replaced subsequently to the initial main, Catastrophic Scar fracture, it should have healed without the lesser fracture zones, as the pressure had already been relieved by the initial catastrophe. The new floor would just flow smoothly across without fractures emanating again from the main scar.
The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science. And the Hydroplate theory? SERIOUSLY? How was the water contained? Rock, at least the rock which makes up the earth's crust, doesn't float. The water would have been forced to the surface long before Noah's time, or Adam's time for that matter. Even a mile deep, the earth is boiling hot, and thus the reservoir of water would be superheated. Further heat would be added by the energy of the water falling from above the atmosphere. As with the vapor canopy model, Noah would have been poached. Where is the evidence? The escaping waters would have eroded the sides of the fissures, producing poorly sorted basaltic erosional deposits. These would be concentrated mainly near the fissures, but some would be shot thousands of miles along with the water. (Noah would have had to worry about falling rocks along with the rain.) Such deposits would be quite noticeable but have never been seen.
The Bible said the Earth is round, it predicted the hydrologic cycle, innumerable stars, the ocean currents, mountains in the seas, that the life of the flesh is in the blood and many other things. It has often set the course for research that only confirmed its claims and became what today we know as science. Despite hypocrisy in every demonination, the proof regarding the existence of God lies in the things that are made (Romans 1 & commonsense. )
Dr.Kurt Wise has the most realistic description of what happened during the great flood no sugar coating 100% graphic and real to the point no Daisy's and fruit baskets story
Can you imagine the upheaval they experienced inside that ark? The entire land mass broke up and after that drifted to what we have now. Originally, there was one mass of water and one mass of land.
@ALABAMA CHAMPIONS Your god is a laughtable invention of oriental shepherds, Modern science is a by far better world explanation than superstitious nonsense. Keep your lake of fire for yourself.
@@JC-sj2pd That the old fallacious argument by Blaise Pascal. What makes you sure, you chose the right cult. If Mohammed is right, you go to hell because you believe in Jesus. And really, fuck god, I don´t need an eternal dictator, who has a dismal record of crimes.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 if I’m wrong and there is no God, then in the end, it doesn’t matter. If I’m right, then in the end, it matters more than anything.
@@Theoriginalbubbafett Nope, it doesnt´t matter. You still must be sure a) to have the right god b) that this god is really such a sadistic moron as depicted in the bible
The Great Flood of Noah's day has been studied for decades by Institute for Creation Research . I totally believe it did happen, for many reasons. My own observations and road trips, the exact Genesis account, and icr research.
ICR are laughable hacks. Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
The funniest part of this video is when it shows that there were 1000 ft tidal waves that not only Noahs ark survived but also sorted out the specific flora and fauna into specific layers with no mixing of said flora and fauna.😭. One also (if you believe the story) has to take into account that all the continents shifting etc happened in 40 days. Think about that for a moment
@@estebanleacho9315 "explain everything dying at once in one place, they died millions of years part but all ended up in the same space?" Some correct grammer might help to make your sentence comprehensible. For example like this: Explain how a flood deposits marine wormholes in perfect preservation on mountain tops.
It's simple. Some people don't want certain things to be true. So when faced with evidence that agrees and corroborate with what the Bible says they get all mad. I was debating with some one on a site once and I mentioned that demons were real He got bent out of shape and mad, starting using profanity and vulgar language. Some people really get offended by the truth. I just calmly told him, sorry you feel that way man, I haven't heard from him since
Your video seemed somewhat accurate giving one a fairly accurate view. I live in an area where we can easily see the layers. Not far from us are tracks of ancient animals. In the pre-flood time, there were no oceans. The oceans appeared in the collapse of the earth's underground skeleton. This collapse is what brought forth the fountains of the deep. The earth's water then gushed to the surface. The whole earth was somewhat tropical before the flood. Thank you for your very nice depiction of the laying down of the layers. Your short-time scenario is spot on.
@Richard Fox You err. The present narrative is a series of inventions. I brought the problems with it up to my geology teacher years ago, and all he could say was "I don't know." They are taught to say what they do, but they don't know. I do.
@@MrWeezer55 you just eat ANYTHING that the establishment shoves in your face and your ego makes you HAVE to hold on to it or you would feel small and you aren’t strong enough as a man to allow that to happen so you stay deceived lol there’s your tell Bro lol can’t hear me can you cognitive dissonance much lol
@@WilliamH490 Unlike you, I don't have a brain that is a cold bowl of oatmeal. What exactly are you trying to say? Slow down. Sound out your words. Try to make sense. I know it's hard, but you can try!
The dinosaur extinction happened 65 million years ago. Are you suggesting that Noah’s flood happened that long ago? That’s a long time even for the Old Testament.
Like Katrina ? Like 2004 in Asia tsunami They happen all the time Doesn't mean the same flood as Noah And if they were how, could they be told if god supposedly wiped out all the people except Noah ?
Yes, but all the stories are different. With different protagonists, different reasons for the gods to be "angry", different landing locations of the ship. Seems far more plausible that many cultures experienced different local floods. -- which their ancestors assumed engulfed the whole world. The stories of those different localized floods became of the the origin story of each tribe. This process is very analogous to different tribe each coming up with stories about gods... but each tribe's pantheon is different than the pantheon of the gods of the next tribe.
The timeline in the Protestant OT was corrupted and greatly shortened. Using the genealogical timeline in the Septuagint (greek translation from 250bc - still used by Orthodox Christianity, BTW), adds another 6-700 years or so. Otherwise there’s not enough time for any of the early cultures to arise.
It was also part of my engineering studies, geology and geomorphology. I was astounded to find out that they had built the Karapiro Dam in New Zealand over a fault line. We moved away from there not long afterwards and the dam is still there. The flinders ranges in South Australia and the Northern Territories have the most remarkable rock formations. I won’t rabbit on about things but logically the earth and all the surrounding planets, comets, asteroids stars etc are in general chaos. Just like the traffic in London, New York or other great cities, everyone travels at their available speed, gets to where they want to go and ignores everything else. The main difference is the time factor. Regards. Dennis.
@@brucethompson7214 You see lights in the firmament. Actually called luminaries, by the creator who created them. Luminaries, are LIGHTS by definition. Read Genesis chapter one, and explain to yourself, how anything that is said, describes, "planets" or that there's a Solar system, that is ever growing and expanding???? OR Did he say it was COMPLETE ON DAY 6??? Does it not say that he rested on the 7th day (The Sabbath) that he rested from all his work and it was COMPLETE. For your souls sake, read your Bible. Its literally: B Basic I Instructions B Before L Leaving E Earth
Noah's Ark was actually adrift for 225 days. Then he had to stay inside for another 150 until the waters drained and the ground dried enough to walk on. 225 and 150 makes 375.
@@asunder6797 The window was a full length ventilation slot like lots of industrial buildings have. Put your head up your rear orfice and die from methane poisoning . So you are ignorant and stupid.
The calendar in Biblical times was far different from how we count days, weeks, years and centuries today! There is no way that Noah could only save his family of 8, the only humans the only humans on Earth is inane and incestuous at best! And some animals, certainly not two of every species of animals, they would have eaten each other in the ark! It is simply a story that has little truth in basis! Just like, Jonah was never swallowed by a whale, who has a small throat, it was probably a large grouper that took him into its mouth and spit him out, a normal practice of fish to see if it's something they want to swallow. And Lazaras did not die and come to life, nor did Jesus; they were both no doubt in a coma and then returned to consciousness. The Bible has many stories that were written with a purpose in mind, to induce humans to learn good from evil and behave better, and if it did, good and if those stories will still help people to behave themselves, probably out of fear, so much the better, whatever works!
Actually, the Grand Canyon was formed after the flood. After the water abated, it created massive lakes that collapsed and carved out the Grand Canyon. They were call the Grand Lake and Hopi Lake.
Great book that agrees with and explains much of this is In The Beginning by Walt Brown. Great documentation. He actually worked for government in the military with satellite images proving and revealing much of what is stated here. Also research Grand Lake to learn how Grand Canyon was really formed and the Baja Peninsula.
Walt Brown was a joke - just like his impossible hydroplate theory: 1. The rock that makes up the earth's crust does not float. The water would have been forced to the surface long before Noah's time, or before Adam's time for that matter. 2. Even two miles deep, the earth is boiling hot (260 to 270 degrees C at 5.656 miles in one bore hole), and thus the reservoir of water would be superheated. Further heat would be added by the energy of the water falling from above the atmosphere. As with the vapor canopy model, Noah would have been poached. 3. The escaping waters would have eroded the sides of the fissures, producing poorly sorted basaltic erosional deposits. These would be concentrated mainly near the fissures, but some would be shot thousands of miles along with the water. Such deposits would be quite noticeable but have never been seen.
Walt Brown is hilarious. Superheated steam blasting from the earth's crust while the crust is in a plasma state from the immense heat generated. A ball of plasma with a homemade boat loaded with 2.8 million species at a minimum
@@plainsman You're completely wrong, Walt Brown is not a joke and you're another example of someone who's been brainwashed by mainstream wannabe science. Mask back on, sheep.
If God's Grace plan was to protect that boat and it's occupants from this watery catastrophic event, and it was protected , then the Genesis account is absolutely true. His timeline for humanity is 7.000 years , from Adam to Revelation chapter 22.... We are at approximately 5.892.... add to that the 7 year tribulation , then the 1000 year Millennium... We are Soooo close... So when the so called scientific community babbles on about " Millions of millions years"... Just remember those Clams buried amongst the dinosaur bones. And Thank God our Eternal Life will be with Him , and this evil planet will be transformed , never to be corrupted again. 🌈✝️🇺🇲
Amen! A product of excellent and comprehensive research. A very informative and inspiring presentation that evokes reverence and worship for the Almighty God.
LOL the asshat said two of each when the BIBLE says two of each UNCLEAN aka PIGS etc. PLUS the research is false! PLUS DNA says that a great many survived the flooding of the BLACK LAKE ca 7k years ago which is the biblical flood! Total IGNORANCE
@@warrenclyde2467 kindly provide solid data to support your point, my friend. (e.g. Where in the DNA proves many survived.) Your feedback is so much welcome and appreciated. Thank you. 🙂
...Said the man with no science education who doesn't understand evolution, biology, genetics or geology. This video is creationist, anti-science garbage.
@@blaster-zy7xx, aside from science education, I also have proper English education. You should've started your comment with "Says the man" not "Said the man." Furthermore, kindly clarify the term "anti-scienec." Such a term doesn't exist like the theory of evolution, which breaks down under heavy scientific scrutiny. I can think intelligently and confidently because I was made by an Intelligent Creator. I respect your views, my friend. But if you believe that everything just happened by chance, how can you then be sure that your ideas are sound or that you are even thinking correctly? Please enlighten me. Thank you. 😉
@@AgeDeo2009 "Says" is the present tense. "Said" is past tense. Both are correct, but if you wish to be that pedantic, then it should have been "Wrote the man.." since we were not speaking at all. Next, "anti-science" isn't hard to understand. Since creationism is anti-science, (against science even though they falsely claim to be supported by science) then we can, and do label creationism as a pseudo-science. Biological evolution is the scientifically accepted explanation for the diversity of modern living organisms we see today. You can beleive all you wish that your deity invented evolution as his method, but denying evolution altogether is tantamount to denying a spherical earth. You are just denying reality while demonstrating that your religion is simply incorrect. "In Science and Creationism, The National Academy of Sciences states unequivocally that creationism has no place in any science curriculum at any level."
Thank you I found this very interesting and easy to listen to “I believe “ Gods word …The earth is flat has four corners like a footstool with a dome covering called a firmament , this creates the rainbow 🌈 Gods Covenant with His Children
Wow! You did such a very good job with this video. Video clips and all! Good job! I really enjoyed it. It's just not long enough. We need some more god long documentaries like this to view and take it all in. I enjoy them all. Maybe you could remake it, speak a bit slower, and perhaps lengthen the video clips with sound effects. It's such a good presentation truly all of the unsaved need to see and hear. These are just my thoughts. Good job!
I agree. It was a bit too fast. It would sound even better if you put in some quotes from well known scientists that support the facts that prove a colossal flood event did indeed happen.
There was a similar flood story in the Middle East about a man named Gilgamesh hundreds of years before that the Noah story was copied from. There was also an earlier flood story hundreds of years before that the Gilgamesh story was copied from.
It isn't a fact that the Gilgamesh legend pre-dates Noah. Conventional dating negates Noah and Biblical chronology and is a social construction designed, like Uniformitarianism, to deny God.
That was fabulous and I hope all of our children and grandchildren are blessed with this beautiful truthful and phenomenal powerful factual message for the Glory of our Almighty Creator God YHWH & Beloved Messiah Yeshua who has gave us all the best gift for us to have our hearts and minds together with our confessions and repent of sins forgiveness and eternal life reconciliation with our Loving Holy God. I’m going to pray for you and your message to help share with the people who are lost and need to be saved.
Of course there were dinosaurs on the ark. They just would have brought small ones, and after the flood the ecosystem was completely different so they never reached the same huge sizes. Even today reptiles grow their entire lives, imagine reptiles that lived for hundreds of years before the flood. They would have been monsters. Also, consider how similar "dragons" and "dinosaurs" are: terrifying gigantic lizards that laid eggs. Every language has a word for dragons. Once you realize that dinosaurs are actually dragons and you start to research, you'll find loads of evidence that men and dragons (dinosaurs) did live at the same time. They're also discovering that fossilized dinosaur bones actually still have unfossilized tissue inside the bones, further proof that they're not millions of years old.
They probably didn't survive very long after the flood, due to the ice age. Also, they would have been hunted due to the fact that: If you kill a deer a family can eat for a day. If you kill a sauropod a city can eat for a week. And the large meat eating dinosaurs would have been hunted out as a threat.
Well done. If the oceans were heated by rifting/subduction/lava vents etc. how did all the sea creatures survive that were of course not aboard the ark?
Thank you for doing this. Would love to see a real discussion of the climate implications in a post-flood world. My educated supposition is that we are still recovering from the ice sheets that covered most of the northern hemisphere. It would take literally thousands of years for the climate to normalize with that much weather modifying ice on the surface. So far I've seen no real discussions of this subject by Christian sources. ICR doesn't discuss it which is sad since I think there is a direct link to what is commonly called "Global Warming" today. That said, since this is my first time discovering your channel, I'm seeing there are other videos about the flood. I will keep watching and see if you discuss this. :)
Holy fuck.. ditch the labels. If the only way you can evaluate information is from the point of view of retroactively justifying your beliefs... why even look to begin with? If you are certain you're correct, why do you need to look? Certainly it isn't just an elaborate scheme to lie to yourself, with the back-of-the-mind knowledge that you could go to hell if you don't... even if it isn't exactly that, it's still exactly that. Quit bringing the world down with you because you're afraid to die. Your religion does not need to be engaged in scientific ventures. Science means you don't know the outcome when you start... not make the evidence fit your outcome.
There's a difference between the incredibly gradual warning trend since the ice age and the catastrophically fast warning that has happened in the last century and which is clearly linked to human actions.
@@ElijahDawkins-yb1uc The "warming" is all in the last 40-60 years. Go look at the real charts, not the ones that the media gives you - the overall trend over 1200 years is an extreme cooling. We're no where near as warm as it was 1200-1400 years ago when there was little to manmade industrial pollution. We also have volcanic records that go back centuries and our volcanic activity has dropped off significantly over the past 100 years. This directly affects how warm our climate is because volcanic activity cools the climate. Also, volcanic activity injects aerosols and other carbons (like CO2) into the atmosphere which is why the planet cools. They seem to conveniently leave this part out of the models. It's actually been proven now that CO2 actually cools the atmosphere, not the other way around. Unfortunately the media continues to only publish information from scientists who are paid by their respective governments to promote a political agenda. The problem is that there are real serious concerns for our current world if we continue to ignore actual science when it comes to climate.
I could be going out on a limb; BUT.. We could be at the latter end of this ice age; I'm interested as you are!! Those Mammoths encased in ice, wS probably the beginning of new weather pattern?
Because Noah was the main human that God worked with in this instance. It gives a sense of reference, rather than calling everything "God's Flood", or "Law of God".
Because Noach was named project manager by G-d. His job was to save humanity from drowning. Just as Adam had a 'fall' and Moshe had the 'Law of Moshe', this was Noach's Flood.
The same way that the Jews call God's 10 Commandments "The Law of Moses"🤔 Thing is...I realized this video misses lots of "scientific details" (I study science & theology objectively with the understanding of Jesus Christ spiritually) & those details are missing parts that link up where the mass extinction in science collude perfectly with biblical account. I've tried to explain it from a scientific & biblical account, but it's a long explanation. In short: When The Almighty did it, he threw a massive snowball at our earth (hence, the huge, underwater crater in the Gulf of Mexico). The explanation here is about as accurate as believing in a flat earth.
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
It's interesting how you are tying the Noah flood story with the extension of the dinosaurs 🦕 Everyone is entitled to their own theories. Thank you for sharing!
In Job, God said, he created the Behemoth, which might have been the Brachiosaurus, at the same time as man (Job 40:15). No theory... just a biblical fact.
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
Consider that, this model also informs alternative location for where Noah lived prior to the flood. He could have in fact drifted from several other locations on the planet, only to end up in Mesopotamia. I've never liked the idea that the ark somehow drifted in circles around one relatively small geographic location. Rising with the body of large moving waters, and settling back down in a similar place, months later. It is more likely the ark moved from quite far distances. Based on the flow rate towards the edge of the American continent, I'd say the ark could have also originated in the Americas, and ended up in Mesopotamia. What do you think?
Scripture clearly states where the patriarchs lived, if you care to read it. God was in control of the Ark , not water or wind . And God decided where it would settle .
@@frankcraig3734 Noah is not a priest , but a righteous man, scripture does not make any reference to him and the order of Melkizedek, who apears in the time of Abraham. The only person besides Melkizedek ( who is most likely Jesus ) in the order of Melkizedek is Jesus . Melkizedek was without father or mother , eternal. We know who noahs parents were. Read the scriptures for yourself, carefully, videos on the internet arent the truth .
I think you are deluded. Turkey isn't Mesopotamia. Also you are ignorant of the fact the Earth tilted over many degrees - perhaps 90! - due to ice buildup about 200 years after The Flood.
@@frankcraig3734 I'll trust the bible as my sole source of written truth. Ive been reading it for 33 years. Ive read most of the other apocryphal books too, but my understanding so far is that if it isn't in the bible its not necessary to know . The grand multitude of human ideas isnt important. Enjoy your journey, ill stick with the plain truth.
I know, like how some idiots believe against every law of physics that nothing exploded into something and magically reassembled itself into life. I still cant get my gin to fire on its own.
The one about the mindless nothing creating intelligent life, and everything else, so that life can prosper and survive... has to be the biggest comedy script of all-time.
@@11aaf An omnipotent Sky-Father who creates life on this planet -- only to wipe most of it out in a psychotic flood event. Sounds like he was off his "meds" that day. Science has demonstrated that over 99% of all animal species which have ever existed have gone extinct. -- That is quite some "plan" -- Create, destroy. Create, destroy. --- The Abrahamic god seems to be driven by (human-) emotion. In fact, the very notion that Divine Purpose can be reduced in writing to human concepts such as "anger" or "love" seems silly on its face. -- Unless god is a human invention.
I believe many of the stone structures they struggle to explain how they were made so precisely and intricately could explained as the people genuinely had softer stone to work with. Sedimentary rock? Yes today. Soft sediment layers then. Only hardening once exposed to air. And time.
Also, the time after the flood was quite something, as temperatures changed, with more melting and flooding. People forget that geological records also speak about the several hundreds of years after the great flood, having more massive changes. Job records quite a bit of testimony concerning that volital time period
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
It's so great to see that science is now doing what god intended it to do and show the poor if faith that his words are true .he truly loves us all and knows the weak of spirit are as loved as the strong.
The Bible said the Earth is round, it predicted the hydrologic cycle, innumerable stars, the ocean currents, mountains in the seas, that the life of the flesh is in the blood and many other things. It has often set the course for research that only confirmed its claims and became what today we know as science. Despite hypocrisy in every demonination, the proof regarding the existence of God lies in the things that are made (Romans 1 & commonsense.)
@@JC-sj2pd I can only laugh that my fate was already decided for me before I was even born lol There’s no turning back from being an abomination in your creators eyes 🤷🏽♂️
Before humanity fell adam and eve and the intention for everyone was to have all the fruits, seeds, nuts and herbs to be our meat. Hence vegan. Not vegetarian. By today's definition. But in truth it was just called eating and living. There was no need for terms and definitions. It just was.
Ya then Satan came and gave us knowledge which made God angry cuz now we can think for ourselves instead of being dumb as dogs. Sometimes I think Satan was the good guy and God was the bad guy trying to enslave us Satan broke history of those bonds of slavery we wish to be the wrong God we worshiping the wrong person no one understands that
@@RD-BRAUNSIN The Creator is ONE, out of the time/space/matter realm... Everything that was created belongs to a dualist system. Dualist, not dualism. The SAME Creator created the same tree that is called the good and the evil knowledge... Long story short, The Creator created things and how they act and react. So, the part we can deal with is good for those that are good and bad for those that are bad. The math is here and, when we leave this material world, the paycheck arrives. Who created the Eden serpent? Who sent that confusion over Babel? Or that lier spirit? Or Who sent that death angel against some Israel enemies...? Who is talking on Dt 28? Cold, heat Up, down Grow, shrink chaos, order Light, darkness Love, hate Happiness, sadness ...you name them. All dualities. Read John's letters paying attention to these words, one pointing to something good, then two lines later a word in absolute opposition to the first... ...this happens many times. Dt 28, the same thing... ...two sides of the brain, of the heart... The sound wave completes a cycle after running on the positive side and the negative side. ...and we could keep mentioning tons of examples here...
@@RD-BRAUNSIN lol satan didn't give them knowledge. The tree was God's. And in reality satan stole the authority that God gave man over creation, so in reality the authority you and I could have over the earth was stolen by satan's lies. You think satan cares about you? he wasn't the one who died for you to be saved from GOD's wrath because of your sins, it was Jesus Christ sent by GOD because of His love. GOD bless you! "For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of GOD." (Romans 3:23) "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of GOD is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23) "But GOD demonstrates His own love towards us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8) "Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6) "For GOD so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16) "The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of GOD is at hand. Repent, and believe the Gospel." (Mark 1:15)
Similar lengends also exists in Hinduism where a Sadhu named Manu created an arc for the great flood. His descendents are called Manushya, which is Sanskrit term for humans.
Hinduism is satanic and False. Let’s just say that was true what I said that someone had similar stories, so what? Also the ancestors of Noah would pass the story along like telephone game and change it unlike The HOLY Bible!
There are flood stories all over the world because the Genesis Flood was an event that happened worldwide. When Noah's descendants migrated throughout the world, they took the story with them, and through the many miles and years, their stories would have changed as it was told, and retold. With Bible scripture though, the Dead Sea Scrolls prove that the Genesis Flood event remains the same throughout the many centuries.
@@11aaf Would you mind explaining how there are also civilisations around the world that kept detailed records that spanned the period that Noah's flood was supposed to have happened, but make no mention whatsoever of a global flood? Almost as if it never happened to them?
@@wallyman292 It happens a lot mate. Creationist constantly trot out the weak "There are flood stories all over the World" argument. I have asked this question to many of them, and not a single one has come back with an answer. I'm not one for pointless arguments, but I'll be content if I can compel a few ostriches to lift their heads out of the sand and confront reality for just a few minutes!
There are many cultural stories and scriptures of different faiths that outline a great flood or many great flood stories. The Genesis story is not unique. There were various great planetary cataclysms and some caused huge floods in various parts of the world. See the words of Graham Hancock, he explains it all in very clear terms and scientifically without scripture of any faith tradition. This presentation pull from some of those events tying Biblical references to them. This was all part of the evolution of the planet. The Bible is a useful book but the stories are mostly metaphors and often borrowed from other cultures and scriptures. The bible should be read not as history but as symbolic and as a moral guide, ie the gospels. Most Christian do not even know the history for the circumstance of the creation of the bible. If told they would deny anything they were told. Tragic because that keeps us in ignorance.
God saved way more people than just Noah and his family. I truly believe he saved a lot of people throughout the world, because it’s totally impossible to re-populate the entire world with all of these different ethnicities just from Noah and his family.
@@earlysda everything God has done isn’t in the Bible you do realize that the Bible was put together by a group of people almost 1000 years after Jesus death so there’s a lot of stuff that happened that’s not in the Bible. You do realize you couldn’t re-populate the whole world from incest with only 4 family members, and you would never get all of the different races that are on earth all of the different ancient civilizations on earth had their own flood story I truly believe God, saved way more than Noah.
@@catibree1 plus there’s not enough time from the time of the flood until now to have over 6 billion people on earth from 4 people. All of the different ancient civilizations on earth had a flood story. There’s a lot of things that God has done that it’s not in the Bible. God does a lot of things for people even now, but most people don’t ever know it.
@@bigrooster6893 BigRooster, you keep trying to overthrow God's holy words. That is foolish. . 1Peter 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. . The fact that it is very easy to get to 8 billion people from only 8 people in a few thousand years shows that you have not studied this issue. . "It is relatively easy to calculate the growth rate needed to get today’s population from Noah’s three sons and their wives, after the Flood. With the Flood at about 4,500 years ago, it needs less than 0.5% per year growth.6 That’s not very much." . "The standard exponential model of population growth is as follows: N = N0e kt where N = the population size at time t, N0 is the population size at time 0, and k = the growth rate. Importantly, this formula should only be applied to large populations". . Hopefully now you will repent, and resolve to follow the Holy Bible.
@@albertroach7130 - Nonsense. There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils. Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them.
@@SalvableRuin I asked the question questions, where are your answers? But nevertheless I will ask again. What about a seed from a seed bearing tree or plant? I asked because you said there wasn't any death.
@@SalvableRuin I also asked, where in the Holy scriptures did God tell man to kill and eat animals and when did man first eat the flesh of and animal? That is what I asked. Waiting
Sorry you had to wait so long. Just now found this video and read the comments. Answer to your last question is Genesis 9:3 - "Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. I have given you all things, even as the green herbs." That is the place in Holy Scriptures where God gave man PERMISSION to kill and eat animals. This is after Noah, his family, and all the animals get off the Ark after the flood waters recede. The first animal death I can find recorded is Genesis 3:21 where God made tunics of skin to clothe Adam and Eve after they ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil after being deceived by the serpent early in chapter 3. This is known as the "fall of man" and God then pronounces judgment on Adam, Eve, the serpent, and all creation later in chapter 3. Romans 8:22 comments on this saying "the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now." as a result of Adam and Eve's disobedience and resulting judgment. We know from Genesis 4 that Adam's son, Abel, was bringing the firstborn of his flock as an offering to God so animal death continued to occur after the fall of man. Shortly after that, the first murder is recorded when Cain killed his brother Abel out of jealousy. Genesis 6 describes how evil man had become, which is why God chose to send a worldwide flood to destroy "all flesh in which is the breath of life". While the Bible does not state explicitly when man started eating animals, we do know that was not God's intent and that was probably a small part of the evilness of man. That takes me to your question about seeds. By God's definition, plants don't die since they are not flesh and do not have the breath of life in them. If you have other questions, I highly recommend a visit to the Ark Encounter in Williamstown, KY. It is a Biblically scaled Noah's ark loaded with teaching to answer almost any questions you might have. I would love to have you be my guest at the Ark. I can provide you with a free pass for you and a guest. I will just need your names and an email address. Reading Genesis chapters 1 through 11 would also be a great investment of your time. The purpose of the Ark was to save Noah, whom God found to be righteous, his family, and 2 to 14 representatives of Biblical animal kinds to replenish the earth after the flood. Salvation from the flood was also available to any other people who chose to enter the Ark before God closed the door in Genesis 7:16. No one besides Noah's family chose to enter the Ark of Salvation and all of them perished in the world-wide flood. The Bible teaches there is another judgment coming. And just like the flood of Noah, God is providing a way to escape judgment. This time it is through the sacrificial death of His Son, Jesus Christ on the cross on Good Friday and His glorious resurrection on Easter. Everyone has the opportunity, but everyone has to make a choice. Just like with the flood, there will come a time when it will be too late. No one but God knows when this judgment will come. However, it was about 2000 year from Creation to the Flood, about 2000 years from the Flood to Jesus' resurrection, and about 2000 years from his resurrection until today. The clock is ticking. If you would like more information on what accepting Jesus' free gift of salvation looks like, I would be glad to share that with you or anyone else who is interested.
I remember telling bible stories to kids when they were young. After telling the story of the flood, my daughter asked me why God would kill everyone on earth like that. My answer was because they had become too evil and were beyound repentance. Then she asked, " Even the babies?" I never looked at bible stories the same after that.
I'd say God alone is the one who grants life and he alone has the right to take it away. As for babies God will be ready to accept them all into heaven that have not reached a level of accountability and understanding for our corrupted sinful nature.
@@vampirehunter533 I appreciate your reply, but I'm sorry, I don't believe anything justifies the killing of babies or any innocent life. I don't believe this story. It does not jive with a loving parent.
Love how 4 billion years of time is shortened to about a year there would be tons of evidence to show this rapid change yet nothing ever has been found showing this rapid changes anywhere ever
Yes there is , you simply dont want to know . There is no doubt multiple layers were laid down rapidily , so fast that some species , like mastadons still had vegitation still in their mouths and stomachs , not even fully digested , AND their flesh preserved due to rapid burial , not in " millions upon millions " of years ago . You just are not looking . The flood happened just like the Biblw says .
@@adrianojames7903 the Bible is viage ans if you do research you will be upset when you realize im correct. Its ok if your mind is shallow we really don't need your opinion and don't care to hear it either
@@matthewhenson2585 No I wont . I can tell you from personal experience how the Bible is true . I Love God's Word , number one , its Active and Living . For example , I can read of a King named Nebuchanezzar who , the Bible says , before it even took place , would come and take the jewish people captive , destroy their temple , and take gold goblets , silver , everything in this temple to Babylon . Now if the Bible is not true , like you ignorantly state , then none of what I just wrote would be true . No King named Nebuchadnezzar, no temple destoyed in 686 BC , no city named Babylon . But guess what you will find if you decide to put aside your " i refuse to believe any of this nonsense " and actually look for yourself ? BINGO . Yep . All the above history confirms . Lets use a smaller example , just for kicks about a year ago , I was reading in Revelations chapter 2 , where , none other than Jesus Himself mentioned "satans throne" in pergamon , I googled it just for kicks . I always thought this passage was figurtive , NOPE , its for real , but i encourage you to google it yourself . I realize you wont look , because you arent interested in anything that proves yo are wrong , thats the way we all are , prideful , no one likes to be shown they are wrong . But this simply proves the Bible is not just some type of book that has cute stories that are myths , but it reveals a God who knows the beginning from the end , and therefore when He speaks , His words are "living and active." One more then i am finished , if the Bible is false , when I read just this past week and googled whether or not the "Oil and Wine" Jesus spoke about in the parable of the Good Samaritan has any benefits to heal a wound , YEP , you guessed right ! It does Or there is the time I googled the "4 winds on the earth " mentioned in the book of Revelations , BADA BING !!! you just hit the jackpot . You can claim all you want the bible is not true , you will never convince me of anything like that because the Bible says , " Let every man be found a liar , but God be true." That would include you and I and anybody on 2 feet except Jesus .
Totally agree, and please explain again, what happened to the then human races bones?? Were they here at tge same time as the dinosaurs? If so, how could the flood pick and choose only human bones, to be destroyed and lost, without a trace?
I don't think I've ever seen such a disparity in beauty between the video and the message as in this video. So much beautiful science used in the name of proving science wrong.
This isn't a documentary. This is a retelling of creationist religious fiction. "In Science and Creationism, The National Academy of Sciences states unequivocally that creationism has no place in any science curriculum at any level." Direct quote from the National Academy of Sciences
Oh to be young again and have the opportunity to learn Creation from Biblical perspective. I imagine you’ve studied this many, many years. What you put together here, and fly through in explanation, I would love to really understand! Thank you.
@@chrisbrooks4032 the part about magic doesn't work, but God manipulating the ocean water, tsunami, and heavy rain from the sky for 40 days and nights, that would be more plausible.
To me, the great flood in the days of Noah explains all that we find it the world today. Based on many of the comments I read from others, they didn't really watch the entire video or they just pick and choose what to hear and see. There are several books written by earth science people, that talk about the great flood, and explain it in much the same manner as this video. You either believe or you don't.
Uh Oh! Bible chronology puts the flood around 2450 BC. Ancient history around the Nile river goes well back (continuously) before 5000 BC. Might want to return to the drawing board.
Dr Baugh has shown conclusive special x-ray proof of dinosaur prints pressed over with human footprints. I'm only half way through this presentation, so perhaps, hopefully, this will be addressed shortly ...
Baugh was a "Dr" of nothing. His educational claims came from either nonexistent schools or unaccredited Bible schools. Supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and carvings. The largest number of "man tracks" are forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, a somewhat human shape often results. Other alleged "man tracks" including purely erosional features (often selectively highlighted to encourage human shapes), indistinct marks of undetermined origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved tracks (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock).
Yup dinosaur where real creatures some bones found created by the nephlim rest is a cover up like you said Smithsonian collects all evidence with the past including tall skeleton buriels people found farming so nobody could keep evidence. All sounds crazy but today normal is a lie crazy conspiracies theories have all been true lately in last 4 months
Aside from the fact that Baugh was a Dr. of nothing (his alleged degrees were from imaginary colleges and one unaccredited bible college) those "footprints" were baloney. Although genuine dinosaur tracks are abundant in Texas, claims of human tracks have not withstood close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been largely abandoned even by most creationists. Alleged Paluxy "man tracks" involve a variety of spurious phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and indistinct markings of unknown origin.
The only thing I really dislike about this documentary, is that there’s literally no time to read the slides as they fly by. I know I can pause and RW/FF, but I’m just saying.
Flood was caused by a gravitational pull not God. Crazy people think God is a real person, same religion that invented God created the book of Satan to divide humanity, same purpose they wanted to achieve with the flat earth theory all to cause division.
Remember the high mountain ranges of today didn't exist then. How could they as tectonic plate movement wasn't a thing before the flood? Plus the atmosphere was healthier then thus causing healthier plants. It's all in Genesis. Study up. The freaking meteorite theory is crushed in my opinion with this. There's human tracks in some places along side of dinosaur tracks. It seems God wanted to send a reminder of the Flood. Thanks for whoever came out with this. It's exactly what my mind saw when I studied Scriptures in the book of Genesis years ago. God bless you.
@@MrWeezer55 the fact is there's layers there's fossils there's coal oil and gas there's mountains with fossils on top there's great Canyons there's wind gaps water gaps folds and binds poly straight fossils there's many facts but it's how the facts get interpreted the flood recorded in Genesis best explains all these facts
God commanded or brought which animals He wanted to enter the Ark. Original Hebrew reads "Two by two they went to Noah into the Ark male and female as had commanded God. Sometimes the proper explanation of scripture should be read from the original Hebrew and not from what man has interpreted to mean.
Good question, yes young (thus smaller) dinosaurs were brought. 2 of each kind as instructed. And there was plenty of room. See SFT's detailed response which explains this by searching: The Epic Destruction of Aron Ra's Flood Series
These creatures weren't created by God. Outside entities interfered with His creation; thus arose giants and other creatures not sanctioned by Him. First book of Enoch.
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
I can’t answer all your objections, but I’ll start with the major one - the timeline. The Septuagint (the greek translation of the OT from 250bc) has a different genealogical timeline than the Catholic/Protestant one. It places the flood around 4000BC which provides just enough time for the survivors to grow numerous enough to build the Tower of Babel and then found the earliest civilizations - Sumer, Egypt, and Indus River - around 3100bc which is around when they were thought to have started.
@@ktrimbach5771 Sorry but that too is nonsense. There would still not be enough time for humans to repopulate the world with diverse cultures and languages or for the plant and animal species to diversify from the species on the Arc.
What bit did you think was fictional, was there something he presented you think is particularly false? Would be good to understand what information you have on the topic.
@@abel3557 Cool, so explain why there are 'cold' slabs of rock the size of tectonic plates all around the core of the earth and if they're millions of years old they haven't reach equilibrium with the temperature of the rest of the core? Plus how they're even in shape and haven't fully merged with the rest of the core.
@@mdl2427 There are no "cold" slabs of rock. There are massive ancient "graveyards" of continental slabs due to the hot and viscous mantle and dense rocks causing plate subduction. In addition, your first question revolves around the model of a uniform mantle( even layers of the earth as shown in school diagrams) when that's not what it looks like. In real models, we know there are areas of depression and deep magma channels, leading to certain areas being hotter. The subduction of plates usually creates a pocket which may be of lower temperature than the average temperature of most of the mantle, but it's not a large difference.
@@mdl2427 These ancient plates won't fuse with the core because they don't go anywhere near the core. The core is a hyper dense area, and materials of larger densities generally sink. And this sinking is stopped at the center of mass of the earth. Gravity holds things in place, hence why the dense core is ball shaped. What you need to understand is that these ancient plates are different materials from the mantle and core, and they're far less dense than the core. Oceanic plates however, are dense enough to subduct into the mantle. Our continents are too "buoyant due to low density, and they don't subduct into the upper mantle.
What’s interesting is that every culture has a “flood story”. 😌
Perhaps because they all have one common origin; Noahs flood?
@@darrello9478 If all mankind was wiped out apart from Noah and his family on the ark, surely all of these civilisations around the World would not have survived to have recorded a global flood. And maybe more importantly, why are there also civilisations around the World that kept detailed records at the time the flood was supposed to have happened but make absolutely no mention of a global flood? Perhaps because a global flood never happened?
@@cbdwarfer9492 Or perhaps you need to take a dump?
@@darrello9478 Well I can't argue with that well thought out response! When you can come up with an actual logical argument let me know...
That’s because it’s TRUE. IT REALLY HAPPENED. GOD IS REAL!! ❤✝️🙏🏻
Some folks here might know what mudloggers do, they look at the drill cuttings that come to the surface while drilling oil wells, so that you know what formation you're drilling through, and especially when you've entered the reservoir. I did it for a while. I remember logging a well on the Bruce reservoir and for some reason we were doing this almost from the sea surface. And at about 1000 ft below the sea surface we drilling through... shell debris, not fossilized, it still had an iridescent sheen. And thinking to myself, "well that certainly didn't get laid down 10 million years ago!".
Colin Macdonald, well that was interesting! I was so interested to see a few years ago, our oil exploration Sounding teams found Water Rock deep, deep underground. It is mentioned a couple times in scripture and would always confuse me about how that can be, whenever I read it. If true it would explain how God removed the flood over mountains. Sooo the discovery team believes releasing pressure will melt it back to liquid. Earthquakes, Meteors?
@@charlanpennington3989 Well, you'll find brine in practically every oil reservoir. Worth bearing in mind that not only is the Earth mostly covered in ocean but it's also generally over 4000m deep but the land is mostly less than 1000m high. We're still kind of flooded.
@@colinmacdonald5732 , well that kind of slapped me awake. I never think of us as still flooded. So, what about the little plants that produced all the oil. How did that happen? In simple language please.
@@charlanpennington3989 Hydrocarbons come from sea creatures not plants. You get coal from plants. AFAIK apply enough preasure and heat to a tub of shellfish you'll get crude oil, the carbon and the hydrogen are there already. Don't ask me to explain the chemistry behind this!
@@colinmacdonald5732 , thankyou, finally something that makes sense. Could the shiny shell fish have been old without receiving the required pressure? Like having the leading edge of a plate dive under but the portion that didn't dive yet, be low pressure still? Or more likely tsunami carried inland and mud debris placed over top, not too thick? PS. Thankyou for this education.
" Repent is the START ....... "
Repent simply means ; rethought , rethink ,
with great anguishing in despair , change of mind
... until you " REPENT " you will not turn any direction ,
you will only continue in and on your current way .
MARANATHA ....... The Repent Guy
In the desert in California there are huge oyster beds on top of hills. Makes no sense unless you think about it from the perspective of the Flood.
Never herad of plate tectonics? In fact a flood can not explain the distribution of marine fossils in mountain ranges.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 try to pay attention norbert
@@estebanleacho9315 Attention to morons? No thank you. That would be a waste of time.
That's awesome!
Huge oyster beds could not be created in less than a year. Sorry, but your apologists are wrong on this example. This is a prime example of plate tectonics.
Many of us know of these things, however you chronicalized it all and exposed it in greater detail with lots of other "nuggets" of information. It's amazing how God informs His people through His Holy Spirit about His doings, past, present and future.
Keep faith and stay encouraged brethren. Maranatha!
No you accepted an impossible STORY
fake news
You have accepted a completely disproven theory. Until you can disprove Radiometric Dating (the foundation for physics and chemistry) how can you say this is correct?
This does give a possible explanation to why alot of ancient ruins are buried in so much mud
The flooding is cyclical. It happened before the dinosaurs and again after the dinosaurs, probably many times. Ben Davidson has the best explanation.
@BradClifton
Jon Levi
@@Decoder2040 everything is cyclicler look around. Or at least it seams that way. And I don't think anyone wants us to know that.
@Mark Duffield people aren't satisfied with one answer, they need others to fill in the blank. im with you, i don't doubt God's word, if he says the earth was flooded at one point i have to take him at his word. none of us were around when Jesus was born, yet the scriptures give us the history of that period in 4 different accounts of the gospels. Romans did record the time Pontius was governor, however by the time the Romans converted to Christianity in 300AD, they began to distance themselves from there old history. then when Catholicsm was founded in 400AD, the Emperor of Rome tried to erase some things from history, but archeologist always are the one's that keep history alive.
@@Decoder2040 And its going to happen again quite soon; loking where all those bones are deposited and the vast amount of coal reinforces his video last night 1/25/23
This flood wasn't just a flood, it was destruction.
The flood wasn’t just a flood, it is a religious myth that never happened. Should have studied real science.
There was no global flood. There is zero evidence to support the claim just like most of the fairy tales in the bible.
Where does the bible say that?
@@harryw29 In genesis 6:13
The Lord opened the infirment. It wasn't normal rain. It was more of a drowning
I'm 4 minutes in and this production is amazing .💯
You must be really easily convinced.
@@DownhillAllTheWay
Fully persuaded
@@dadkingcoffey8333 Me too. But I don't get the impression of being fully persuaded of the same things you are.
@@DownhillAllTheWay the word of God is my source for truth
@@dadkingcoffey8333 Total disbelief in its existence is mine.
And if any of those dinosaurs graves happened in accordance with fossil dating (I.e. millions of years ago) the bones would be dust by now
Scientifically vacuous nonsense. The most common process of fossilization happens when an animal is buried by sediment, such as sand or silt, shortly after it dies. Its bones are protected from rotting by layers of sediment. As its body decomposes all the fleshy parts wear away and only the hard parts, like bones, teeth, and horns, are left behind. Over millions of years, water in the nearby rocks surrounds these hard parts, and minerals in the water replace them, bit by bit. When the minerals have completely replaced the organic tissue, what's left is a solid rock copy of the original specimen.
So true, but try telling the atheists that.
You are correct---in fact, the existence of the Millions of complete
fossils actually PROVE both the flood, AND a much younger earth.
and no dna or cells
@@estebanleacho9315 that’s a lie, there has never been a dinosaur found with preserved DNA or cells, and the bones are preserved with layers of rock, that’s why they’re fossils and not bones, jeez y’all are so dumb.
Thank you for this; I learned quite a bit. This will necessitate me re-examining the Hydroplate Theory which until now I had always considered 'water-tight'. It was the part mentioning cooler areas lower in the mantle that really got my attention; I don't think the HP can account for that.
Have your considered the fact that the ocean floor has thousands of fracture zones that follow the mid ocean ridges and emanate from that Catastrophic Scar perpendicular to that scar and many of those fractures run from shore to shore, continent to continent and are caused by fact that the earth is a globe, not a cylinder and therefore as the major fracture of the scar traveled around the earth, it also fractured out from the main fracture to relieve the pressure laterally. There is zero evidence of those fracture zones being deformed, or subsequently disfigured. Also, if the crust had been replaced subsequently to the initial main, Catastrophic Scar fracture, it should have healed without the lesser fracture zones, as the pressure had already been relieved by the initial catastrophe. The new floor would just flow smoothly across without fractures emanating again from the main scar.
The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
And the Hydroplate theory? SERIOUSLY?
How was the water contained? Rock, at least the rock which makes up the earth's crust, doesn't float. The water would have been forced to the surface long before Noah's time, or Adam's time for that matter.
Even a mile deep, the earth is boiling hot, and thus the reservoir of water would be superheated. Further heat would be added by the energy of the water falling from above the atmosphere. As with the vapor canopy model, Noah would have been poached.
Where is the evidence? The escaping waters would have eroded the sides of the fissures, producing poorly sorted basaltic erosional deposits. These would be concentrated mainly near the fissures, but some would be shot thousands of miles along with the water. (Noah would have had to worry about falling rocks along with the rain.) Such deposits would be quite noticeable but have never been seen.
There is nothing new under the sun, GOD is still in charge. BE STILL AND KNOW THAT I AM THE LORD. All science comes back to GOD
The Bible said the Earth is round, it predicted the hydrologic cycle, innumerable stars, the ocean currents, mountains in the seas, that the life of the flesh is in the blood and many other things. It has often set the course for research that only confirmed its claims and became what today we know as science. Despite hypocrisy in every demonination, the proof regarding the existence of God lies in the things that are made (Romans 1 & commonsense. )
Fantastic!!! Thank you!
What a great Gospel Tract for Science appreciation people!
Dr.Kurt Wise has the most realistic description of what happened during the great flood no sugar coating 100% graphic and real to the point no Daisy's and fruit baskets story
Can you imagine the upheaval they experienced inside that ark? The entire land mass broke up and after that drifted to what we have now. Originally, there was one mass of water and one mass of land.
It would put white water rafting to shame, that's for sure!
As realistic as Alice In Wonderland.
@@davidgardner863 then lets play a game? You can go first to my question? What is the second law of thermodynamics?
@@djpilk4772 , That doesn’t sound like a game. Do you know how to use Google?
The problem with science is it’s definition is man’s understanding of what he sees. It’s like sitting around a fire with Job’s friends.
The problem with religion is if it is wrong you still stick with it.
@ALABAMA CHAMPIONS Your god is a laughtable invention of oriental shepherds, Modern science is a by far better world explanation than superstitious nonsense. Keep your lake of fire for yourself.
@@JC-sj2pd That the old fallacious argument by Blaise Pascal. What makes you sure, you chose the right cult. If Mohammed is right, you go to hell because you believe in Jesus.
And really, fuck god, I don´t need an eternal dictator, who has a dismal record of crimes.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 if I’m wrong and there is no God, then in the end, it doesn’t matter. If I’m right, then in the end, it matters more than anything.
@@Theoriginalbubbafett Nope, it doesnt´t matter. You still must be sure
a) to have the right god
b) that this god is really such a sadistic moron as depicted in the bible
The Great Flood of Noah's day has been studied for decades by Institute for Creation Research . I totally believe it did happen, for many reasons. My own observations and road trips, the exact Genesis account, and icr research.
ICR is wonderful.
ICR are laughable hacks. Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
The funniest part of this video is when it shows that there were 1000 ft tidal waves that not only Noahs ark survived but also sorted out the specific flora and fauna into specific layers with no mixing of said flora and fauna.😭. One also (if you believe the story) has to take into account that all the continents shifting etc happened in 40 days. Think about that for a moment
Also very amusing that these tidal waves even deposited the burrowed holes of bottom dwellers in perfect preservation on mountain tops.
explain everything dying at once in one place, they died millions of years part but all ended up in the same space? ...fiction
@@estebanleacho9315
"explain everything dying at once in one place, they died millions of years part but all ended up in the same space?"
Some correct grammer might help to make your sentence comprehensible.
For example like this:
Explain how a flood deposits marine wormholes in perfect preservation on mountain tops.
@@estebanleacho9315 Do you think fossils are only found in America😂
@@JC-sj2pd We didn´t discuss the judgement of the old dude but the nonsense his ground stuff utters.
Some of these comments are filled with anger, why cant people agree to disagree anymore.
Yes u are right
Cause there is "one" that trives in anger and conflict... And he's doing pretty good job causing it.
It's simple. Some people don't want certain things to be true. So when faced with evidence that agrees and corroborate with what the Bible says they get all mad. I was debating with some one on a site once and I mentioned that demons were real He got bent out of shape and mad, starting using profanity and vulgar language. Some people really get offended by the truth. I just calmly told him, sorry you feel that way man, I haven't heard from him since
Look out everyone... We got a "Karen" here...
Your video seemed somewhat accurate giving one a fairly accurate view. I live in an area where we can easily see the layers. Not far from us are tracks of ancient animals. In the pre-flood time, there were no oceans. The oceans appeared in the collapse of the earth's underground skeleton. This collapse is what brought forth the fountains of the deep. The earth's water then gushed to the surface. The whole earth was somewhat tropical before the flood. Thank you for your very nice depiction of the laying down of the layers. Your short-time scenario is spot on.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Read a book on geology.
@@MrWeezer55 I know more than you think.
@Richard Fox You err. The present narrative is a series of inventions. I brought the problems with it up to my geology teacher years ago, and all he could say was "I don't know." They are taught to say what they do, but they don't know. I do.
@@MrWeezer55 you just eat ANYTHING that the establishment shoves in your face and your ego makes you HAVE to hold on to it or you would feel small and you aren’t strong enough as a man to allow that to happen so you stay deceived lol there’s your tell Bro lol can’t hear me can you cognitive dissonance much lol
@@WilliamH490 Unlike you, I don't have a brain that is a cold bowl of oatmeal. What exactly are you trying to say? Slow down. Sound out your words. Try to make sense. I know it's hard, but you can try!
One of my favourite topics to learn and share with others so that the Truth may gain victory and conquer many souls for the eternity! 🙏🙏🙏
Someone is fooling herself.
Very well put together, thank you I needed this today.
You like fiction
@@paulhaynes3688 Oh, as if the shit you believe is any more plausible.
Mesmerising, highly informative.
Nicely put together. Thank you.
This video is a lie
Would love to see this on a flat map. BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY
Mhhm!
The dinosaur extinction happened 65 million years ago. Are you suggesting that Noah’s flood happened that long ago? That’s a long time even for the Old Testament.
That dinosaurs park ...is definitly worth seeing place..wow
At least 40 different cultures have a flood story
Like Katrina ? Like 2004 in Asia tsunami
They happen all the time
Doesn't mean the same flood as Noah
And if they were how, could they be told if god supposedly wiped out all the people except Noah ?
Yes, but all the stories are different. With different protagonists, different reasons for the gods to be "angry", different landing locations of the ship.
Seems far more plausible that many cultures experienced different local floods. -- which their ancestors assumed engulfed the whole world. The stories of those different localized floods became of the the origin story of each tribe.
This process is very analogous to different tribe each coming up with stories about gods... but each tribe's pantheon is different than the pantheon of the gods of the next tribe.
I'd like an explanation of how there is an unbroken chain of Chinese dynasties throughout this period. The flood didn't cover every part of the earth.
Their explanation is that they believe the bible, so anything else that disagrees with the bible is a myth.
The timeline in the Protestant OT was corrupted and greatly shortened. Using the genealogical timeline in the Septuagint (greek translation from 250bc - still used by Orthodox Christianity, BTW), adds another 6-700 years or so. Otherwise there’s not enough time for any of the early cultures to arise.
What? This is over four thousand years BC. The Chinese dynasties didn't start for long afterwards.
It was also part of my engineering studies, geology and geomorphology. I was astounded to find out that they had built the Karapiro Dam in New Zealand over a fault line. We moved away from there not long afterwards and the dam is still there. The flinders ranges in South Australia and the Northern Territories have the most remarkable rock formations. I won’t rabbit on about things but logically the earth and all the surrounding planets, comets, asteroids stars etc are in general chaos. Just like the traffic in London, New York or other great cities, everyone travels at their available speed, gets to where they want to go and ignores everything else. The main difference is the time factor. Regards. Dennis.
There are no planets, comets or asteroids
@@dawncarney5161 then what do we see through telescopes?
@@brucethompson7214 You see lights in the firmament. Actually called luminaries, by the creator who created them. Luminaries, are LIGHTS by definition. Read Genesis chapter one, and explain to yourself, how anything that is said, describes, "planets" or that there's a Solar system, that is ever growing and expanding???? OR Did he say it was COMPLETE ON DAY 6??? Does it not say that he rested on the 7th day (The Sabbath) that he rested from all his work and it was COMPLETE. For your souls sake, read your Bible. Its literally:
B Basic
I Instructions
B Before
L Leaving
E Earth
@@dawncarney5161 sorry I was following actual science.
@@dawncarney5161 there is no intelligent life either, by the looks of it
Noah's Ark was actually adrift for 225 days. Then he had to stay inside for another 150 until the waters drained and the ground dried enough to walk on. 225 and 150 makes 375.
Of course there was no ark, it's all fiction.
And with the small "window" they had of the Ark they all should have died from methane poisoning in a very short time.
@@asunder6797 The window was a full length ventilation slot like lots of industrial buildings have.
Put your head up your rear orfice and die from methane poisoning .
So you are ignorant and stupid.
The calendar in Biblical times was far different from how we count days, weeks, years and centuries today! There is no way that Noah could only save his family of 8, the only humans the only humans on Earth is inane and incestuous at best! And some animals, certainly not two of every species of animals, they would have eaten each other in the ark! It is simply a story that has little truth in basis! Just like, Jonah was never swallowed by a whale, who has a small throat, it was probably a large grouper that took him into its mouth and spit him out, a normal practice of fish to see if it's something they want to swallow. And Lazaras did not die and come to life, nor did Jesus; they were both no doubt in a coma and then returned to consciousness.
The Bible has many stories that were written with a purpose in mind, to induce humans to learn good from evil and behave better, and if it did, good and if those stories will still help people to behave themselves, probably out of fear, so much the better, whatever works!
The flood formed the grand canyon.
Certainly not the Colorado River.
Actually, the Grand Canyon was formed after the flood. After the water abated, it created massive lakes that collapsed and carved out the Grand Canyon. They were call the Grand Lake and Hopi Lake.
Great book that agrees with and explains much of this is In The Beginning by Walt Brown. Great documentation. He actually worked for government in the military with satellite images proving and revealing much of what is stated here.
Also research Grand Lake to learn how Grand Canyon was really formed and the Baja Peninsula.
Walt Brown was a joke - just like his impossible hydroplate theory:
1. The rock that makes up the earth's crust does not float. The water would have been forced to the surface long before Noah's time, or before Adam's time for that matter.
2. Even two miles deep, the earth is boiling hot (260 to 270 degrees C at 5.656 miles in one bore hole), and thus the reservoir of water would be superheated. Further heat would be added by the energy of the water falling from above the atmosphere. As with the vapor canopy model, Noah would have been poached.
3. The escaping waters would have eroded the sides of the fissures, producing poorly sorted basaltic erosional deposits. These would be concentrated mainly near the fissures, but some would be shot thousands of miles along with the water. Such deposits would be quite noticeable but have never been seen.
Walt Brown is hilarious. Superheated steam blasting from the earth's crust while the crust is in a plasma state from the immense heat generated. A ball of plasma with a homemade boat loaded with 2.8 million species at a minimum
@@plainsman You're completely wrong, Walt Brown is not a joke and you're another example of someone who's been brainwashed by mainstream wannabe science. Mask back on, sheep.
@@imafeltersnatch7634 What's wrong, does the truth scare you that much? Put your mask back on.
If God's Grace plan was to protect that boat and it's occupants from this watery catastrophic event, and it was protected , then the Genesis account is absolutely true.
His timeline for humanity is 7.000 years , from Adam to Revelation chapter 22....
We are at approximately 5.892.... add to that the 7 year tribulation , then the 1000 year Millennium... We are Soooo close... So when the so called scientific community babbles on about " Millions of millions years"... Just remember those Clams buried amongst the dinosaur bones. And Thank God our Eternal Life will be with Him , and this evil planet will be transformed , never to be corrupted again. 🌈✝️🇺🇲
Amen! A product of excellent and comprehensive research. A very informative and inspiring presentation that evokes reverence and worship for the Almighty God.
LOL the asshat said two of each when the BIBLE says two of each UNCLEAN aka PIGS etc. PLUS the research is false! PLUS DNA says that a great many survived the flooding of the BLACK LAKE ca 7k years ago which is the biblical flood! Total IGNORANCE
@@warrenclyde2467 kindly provide solid data to support your point, my friend. (e.g. Where in the DNA proves many survived.) Your feedback is so much welcome and appreciated. Thank you. 🙂
...Said the man with no science education who doesn't understand evolution, biology, genetics or geology. This video is creationist, anti-science garbage.
@@blaster-zy7xx, aside from science education, I also have proper English education. You should've started your comment with "Says the man" not "Said the man." Furthermore, kindly clarify the term "anti-scienec." Such a term doesn't exist like the theory of evolution, which breaks down under heavy scientific scrutiny. I can think intelligently and confidently because I was made by an Intelligent Creator. I respect your views, my friend. But if you believe that everything just happened by chance, how can you then be sure that your ideas are sound or that you are even thinking correctly? Please enlighten me. Thank you. 😉
@@AgeDeo2009 "Says" is the present tense. "Said" is past tense. Both are correct, but if you wish to be that pedantic, then it should have been "Wrote the man.." since we were not speaking at all.
Next, "anti-science" isn't hard to understand. Since creationism is anti-science, (against science even though they falsely claim to be supported by science) then we can, and do label creationism as a pseudo-science. Biological evolution is the scientifically accepted explanation for the diversity of modern living organisms we see today. You can beleive all you wish that your deity invented evolution as his method, but denying evolution altogether is tantamount to denying a spherical earth. You are just denying reality while demonstrating that your religion is simply incorrect.
"In Science and Creationism, The National Academy of Sciences states unequivocally that creationism has no place in any science curriculum at any level."
Walt Brown has a vastly superior explanation of the cause & effect of Noah’s flood.
The Almighty is the real deal. 🙌❤️😄
Thank you I found this very interesting and easy to listen to “I believe “ Gods word …The earth is flat has four corners like a footstool with a dome covering called a firmament , this creates the rainbow 🌈 Gods Covenant with His Children
The flood also came from the canopy veil falling. "Waters above the firmament "
I agree. Love books by Henry M Morris and others.
He said that multiple times.
What's a canopy veil?
Wow! You did such a very good job with this video. Video clips and all! Good job! I really enjoyed it. It's just not long enough. We need some more god long documentaries like this to view and take it all in. I enjoy them all. Maybe you could remake it, speak a bit slower, and perhaps lengthen the video clips with sound effects. It's such a good presentation truly all of the unsaved need to see and hear. These are just my thoughts. Good job!
It is all that you said and may I emphasize it'd be better if I didn't have to keep rewinding to hear what was said, a bit too fast on the narration.
I agree. It was a bit too fast.
It would sound even better if you put in some quotes from well known scientists that support the facts that prove a colossal flood event did indeed happen.
Was there one content before the flood? Then, multiple contents after the FLOOD?
WOW and WHOA!This event seemed just as catastrophic as the extinction of the dinosaurs.SHIT!
There was a similar flood story in the Middle East about a man named Gilgamesh hundreds of years before that the Noah story was copied from. There was also an earlier flood story hundreds of years before that the Gilgamesh story was copied from.
It isn't a fact that the Gilgamesh legend pre-dates Noah. Conventional dating negates Noah and Biblical chronology and is a social construction designed, like Uniformitarianism, to deny God.
That was fabulous and I hope all of our children and grandchildren are blessed with this beautiful truthful and phenomenal powerful factual message for the Glory of our Almighty Creator God YHWH & Beloved Messiah Yeshua who has gave us all the best gift for us to have our hearts and minds together with our confessions and repent of sins forgiveness and eternal life reconciliation with our Loving Holy God. I’m going to pray for you and your message to help share with the people who are lost and need to be saved.
Have you heard of Kevin zadai in sure you will like him he's met Yeshua
Yep because Kevin Zadai has met God, that sounds convincing
But if the flood killed the dinosaurs, does that mean that Noah didn’t put all animals on the boat
If u use logic no of it makes sense
Of course there were dinosaurs on the ark. They just would have brought small ones, and after the flood the ecosystem was completely different so they never reached the same huge sizes. Even today reptiles grow their entire lives, imagine reptiles that lived for hundreds of years before the flood. They would have been monsters. Also, consider how similar "dragons" and "dinosaurs" are: terrifying gigantic lizards that laid eggs. Every language has a word for dragons. Once you realize that dinosaurs are actually dragons and you start to research, you'll find loads of evidence that men and dragons (dinosaurs) did live at the same time. They're also discovering that fossilized dinosaur bones actually still have unfossilized tissue inside the bones, further proof that they're not millions of years old.
They probably didn't survive very long after the flood, due to the ice age. Also, they would have been hunted due to the fact that:
If you kill a deer a family can eat for a day.
If you kill a sauropod a city can eat for a week.
And the large meat eating dinosaurs would have been hunted out as a threat.
The human explanation is a lot simpler. Our favorite spot to settle is river deltas.
Well done. If the oceans were heated by rifting/subduction/lava vents etc. how did all the sea creatures survive that were of course not aboard the ark?
Many did not. Many species went extinct.
Thank you for doing this. Would love to see a real discussion of the climate implications in a post-flood world. My educated supposition is that we are still recovering from the ice sheets that covered most of the northern hemisphere. It would take literally thousands of years for the climate to normalize with that much weather modifying ice on the surface. So far I've seen no real discussions of this subject by Christian sources. ICR doesn't discuss it which is sad since I think there is a direct link to what is commonly called "Global Warming" today.
That said, since this is my first time discovering your channel, I'm seeing there are other videos about the flood. I will keep watching and see if you discuss this. :)
Holy fuck.. ditch the labels. If the only way you can evaluate information is from the point of view of retroactively justifying your beliefs... why even look to begin with? If you are certain you're correct, why do you need to look?
Certainly it isn't just an elaborate scheme to lie to yourself, with the back-of-the-mind knowledge that you could go to hell if you don't... even if it isn't exactly that, it's still exactly that.
Quit bringing the world down with you because you're afraid to die. Your religion does not need to be engaged in scientific ventures. Science means you don't know the outcome when you start... not make the evidence fit your outcome.
There's a difference between the incredibly gradual warning trend since the ice age and the catastrophically fast warning that has happened in the last century and which is clearly linked to human actions.
@@ElijahDawkins-yb1uc The "warming" is all in the last 40-60 years. Go look at the real charts, not the ones that the media gives you - the overall trend over 1200 years is an extreme cooling. We're no where near as warm as it was 1200-1400 years ago when there was little to manmade industrial pollution. We also have volcanic records that go back centuries and our volcanic activity has dropped off significantly over the past 100 years. This directly affects how warm our climate is because volcanic activity cools the climate. Also, volcanic activity injects aerosols and other carbons (like CO2) into the atmosphere which is why the planet cools. They seem to conveniently leave this part out of the models. It's actually been proven now that CO2 actually cools the atmosphere, not the other way around. Unfortunately the media continues to only publish information from scientists who are paid by their respective governments to promote a political agenda. The problem is that there are real serious concerns for our current world if we continue to ignore actual science when it comes to climate.
I could be going out on a limb; BUT.. We could be at the latter end of this ice age; I'm interested as you are!! Those Mammoths encased in ice, wS probably the beginning of new weather pattern?
I've always wondered why we refer to this catastrophe as "Noah's Flood"?
It was very clearly God's Flood.
Because Noah was the main human that God worked with in this instance.
It gives a sense of reference, rather than calling everything "God's Flood", or "Law of God".
Because Noach was named project manager by G-d. His job was to save humanity from drowning. Just as Adam had a 'fall' and Moshe had the 'Law of Moshe', this was Noach's Flood.
The same way that the Jews call God's 10 Commandments "The Law of Moses"🤔
Thing is...I realized this video misses lots of "scientific details" (I study science & theology objectively with the understanding of Jesus Christ spiritually) & those details are missing parts that link up where the mass extinction in science collude perfectly with biblical account.
I've tried to explain it from a scientific & biblical account, but it's a long explanation.
In short:
When The Almighty did it, he threw a massive snowball at our earth (hence, the huge, underwater crater in the Gulf of Mexico).
The explanation here is about as accurate as believing in a flat earth.
@@maestroaxeman Tommy, your private idea of what happened is your private idea, but it does not match what the inspired words of the Holy Bible say.
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
Wonderful scientific facts that verify the events & the truth of the Word of God! Well done!!
One of the best documentaries I've seen.
It's a crock of vacuous misrepresentations.
Not a lot of science in this one..
Lies for Jesus aren't facts.
@@mortenhallangen1933 Even science was created by God. Humans only discovered science
It's interesting how you are tying the Noah flood story with the extension of the dinosaurs 🦕 Everyone is entitled to their own theories. Thank you for sharing!
In Job, God said, he created the Behemoth, which might have been the Brachiosaurus, at the same time as man (Job 40:15). No theory... just a biblical fact.
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
even though they existed 66 million years ago
@@Akrafena And how was that determined. Not even carbon dating can date that far back
Consider that, this model also informs alternative location for where Noah lived prior to the flood. He could have in fact drifted from several other locations on the planet, only to end up in Mesopotamia. I've never liked the idea that the ark somehow drifted in circles around one relatively small geographic location. Rising with the body of large moving waters, and settling back down in a similar place, months later. It is more likely the ark moved from quite far distances. Based on the flow rate towards the edge of the American continent, I'd say the ark could have also originated in the Americas, and ended up in Mesopotamia. What do you think?
Scripture clearly states where the patriarchs lived, if you care to read it. God was in control of the Ark , not water or wind . And God decided where it would settle .
@@frankcraig3734 Noah is not a priest , but a righteous man, scripture does not make any reference to him and
the order of Melkizedek, who apears in the time of Abraham. The only person besides Melkizedek ( who is most likely Jesus ) in the order of Melkizedek is Jesus .
Melkizedek was without father or mother , eternal. We know who noahs parents were.
Read the scriptures for yourself, carefully, videos on the internet arent the truth .
I think you are deluded.
Turkey isn't Mesopotamia.
Also you are ignorant of the fact the Earth tilted over many degrees - perhaps 90! - due to ice buildup about 200 years after The Flood.
@@frankcraig3734 Don't be! Be sorry for yourself for being so stupid.
@@frankcraig3734 I'll trust the bible as my sole source of written truth. Ive been reading it for 33 years. Ive read most of the other apocryphal books too, but my understanding so far is that if it isn't in the bible its not necessary to know . The grand multitude of human ideas isnt important. Enjoy your journey, ill stick with the plain truth.
Better than any comedy. 😂😂😂
I know, like how some idiots believe against every law of physics that nothing exploded into something and magically reassembled itself into life. I still cant get my gin to fire on its own.
The one about the mindless nothing creating intelligent life, and everything else, so that life can prosper and survive... has to be the biggest comedy script of all-time.
@@11aaf
An omnipotent Sky-Father who creates life on this planet -- only to wipe most of it out in a psychotic flood event. Sounds like he was off his "meds" that day.
Science has demonstrated that over 99% of all animal species which have ever existed have gone extinct. -- That is quite some "plan" -- Create, destroy. Create, destroy. --- The Abrahamic god seems to be driven by (human-) emotion.
In fact, the very notion that Divine Purpose can be reduced in writing to human concepts such as "anger" or "love" seems silly on its face. -- Unless god is a human invention.
God uses the foolish things to confound the wise......1 Corinthians 1/27. First thought ( verse ) that came into my mind. HALLELUJAH.
Great show, my mind is opening.
Wow. . .very well done!! Happily surprised. Rather excellent.
I believe many of the stone structures they struggle to explain how they were made so precisely and intricately could explained as the people genuinely had softer stone to work with. Sedimentary rock? Yes today. Soft sediment layers then. Only hardening once exposed to air. And time.
Your knowledge of geology (among other scientific disciplines) is appalling.
You don't know much about rocks do you
Paul Cook has been finding and exploring these structures on his youtube channel.
Mind blown🤯
The way humanity is acting now.I see Round 2 coming soon.I say GOD,bring it on.🙌🏾🙏🏾
Keepit up :) thank you very much
So grateful I found this video.
Also, the time after the flood was quite something, as temperatures changed, with more melting and flooding. People forget that geological records also speak about the several hundreds of years after the great flood, having more massive changes. Job records quite a bit of testimony concerning that volital time period
Any global flood would have produced evidence contrary to the evidence we see. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctic cores go back 420,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.
It's so great to see that science is now doing what god intended it to do and show the poor if faith that his words are true .he truly loves us all and knows the weak of spirit are as loved as the strong.
There was no science in this video. Only lies from a bunch of morons.
The Bible said the Earth is round, it predicted the hydrologic cycle, innumerable stars, the ocean currents, mountains in the seas, that the life of the flesh is in the blood and many other things. It has often set the course for research that only confirmed its claims and became what today we know as science. Despite hypocrisy in every demonination, the proof regarding the existence of God lies in the things that are made (Romans 1 & commonsense.)
I find this fascinating but I’ll never follow him. He’s already condemned me to hell anyway and I’m an abomination in his eyes 😂
@@JC-sj2pd I can only laugh that my fate was already decided for me before I was even born lol There’s no turning back from being an abomination in your creators eyes 🤷🏽♂️
Or else he kills them all with a great flood, I guess. . .
Before humanity fell adam and eve and the intention for everyone was to have all the fruits, seeds, nuts and herbs to be our meat. Hence vegan. Not vegetarian. By today's definition. But in truth it was just called eating and living. There was no need for terms and definitions. It just was.
Ya then Satan came and gave us knowledge which made God angry cuz now we can think for ourselves instead of being dumb as dogs. Sometimes I think Satan was the good guy and God was the bad guy trying to enslave us Satan broke history of those bonds of slavery we wish to be the wrong God we worshiping the wrong person no one understands that
@@RD-BRAUNSIN The Creator is ONE, out of the time/space/matter realm...
Everything that was created belongs to a dualist system.
Dualist, not dualism.
The SAME Creator created the same tree that is called the good and the evil knowledge...
Long story short, The Creator created things and how they act and react.
So, the part we can deal with is good for those that are good and bad for those that are bad.
The math is here and, when we leave this material world, the paycheck arrives.
Who created the Eden serpent?
Who sent that confusion over Babel?
Or that lier spirit?
Or Who sent that death angel against some Israel enemies...?
Who is talking on Dt 28?
Cold, heat
Up, down
Grow, shrink
chaos, order
Light, darkness
Love, hate
Happiness, sadness
...you name them.
All dualities.
Read John's letters paying attention to these words, one pointing to something good, then two lines later a word in absolute opposition to the first...
...this happens many times.
Dt 28, the same thing...
...two sides of the brain, of the heart...
The sound wave completes a cycle after running on the positive side and the negative side.
...and we could keep mentioning tons of examples here...
My question is about vegetation.
How long the plants took to appear after the flood?
AMEN! GOD CREATED LIFE & EATING. NOT WHAT THE TOP ANGEL WHO DISOBEYED GOD & MAN WHO DISOBEYED GOD "PERVERTED!"
@@RD-BRAUNSIN lol satan didn't give them knowledge. The tree was God's. And in reality satan stole the authority that God gave man over creation, so in reality the authority you and I could have over the earth was stolen by satan's lies. You think satan cares about you? he wasn't the one who died for you to be saved from GOD's wrath because of your sins, it was Jesus Christ sent by GOD because of His love. GOD bless you!
"For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of GOD." (Romans 3:23)
"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of GOD is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23)
"But GOD demonstrates His own love towards us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8)
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6)
"For GOD so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16)
"The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of GOD is at hand. Repent, and believe the Gospel." (Mark 1:15)
Similar lengends also exists in Hinduism where a Sadhu named Manu created an arc for the great flood. His descendents are called Manushya, which is Sanskrit term for humans.
Hinduism is satanic and False. Let’s just say that was true what I said that someone had similar stories, so what? Also the ancestors of Noah would pass the story along like telephone game and change it unlike The HOLY Bible!
There are flood stories all over the world because the Genesis Flood was an event that happened worldwide. When Noah's descendants migrated throughout the world, they took the story with them, and through the many miles and years, their stories would have changed as it was told, and retold. With Bible scripture though, the Dead Sea Scrolls prove that the Genesis Flood event remains the same throughout the many centuries.
@@11aaf Would you mind explaining how there are also civilisations around the world that kept detailed records that spanned the period that Noah's flood was supposed to have happened, but make no mention whatsoever of a global flood? Almost as if it never happened to them?
@@cbdwarfer9492 I see Darwins Myth seems to have vanished rather than address your question. . . Odd! ;)
@@wallyman292 It happens a lot mate. Creationist constantly trot out the weak "There are flood stories all over the World" argument. I have asked this question to many of them, and not a single one has come back with an answer. I'm not one for pointless arguments, but I'll be content if I can compel a few ostriches to lift their heads out of the sand and confront reality for just a few minutes!
There are many cultural stories and scriptures of different faiths that outline a great flood or many great flood stories. The Genesis story is not unique. There were various great planetary cataclysms and some caused huge floods in various parts of the world. See the words of Graham Hancock, he explains it all in very clear terms and scientifically without scripture of any faith tradition. This presentation pull from some of those events tying Biblical references to them. This was all part of the evolution of the planet. The Bible is a useful book but the stories are mostly metaphors and often borrowed from other cultures and scriptures. The bible should be read not as history but as symbolic and as a moral guide, ie the gospels. Most Christian do not even know the history for the circumstance of the creation of the bible. If told they would deny anything they were told. Tragic because that keeps us in ignorance.
God saved way more people than just Noah and his family. I truly believe he saved a lot of people throughout the world, because it’s totally impossible to re-populate the entire world with all of these different ethnicities just from Noah and his family.
i agree. since one of Noah's sons went and "married" a woman from the land of Nod. Not one of his siblings.
Many people think they know more than God.
@@earlysda everything God has done isn’t in the Bible you do realize that the Bible was put together by a group of people almost 1000 years after Jesus death so there’s a lot of stuff that happened that’s not in the Bible. You do realize you couldn’t re-populate the whole world from incest with only 4 family members, and you would never get all of the different races that are on earth all of the different ancient civilizations on earth had their own flood story I truly believe God, saved way more than Noah.
@@catibree1 plus there’s not enough time from the time of the flood until now to have over 6 billion people on earth from 4 people. All of the different ancient civilizations on earth had a flood story. There’s a lot of things that God has done that it’s not in the Bible. God does a lot of things for people even now, but most people don’t ever know it.
@@bigrooster6893 BigRooster, you keep trying to overthrow God's holy words. That is foolish.
.
1Peter 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
.
The fact that it is very easy to get to 8 billion people from only 8 people in a few thousand years shows that you have not studied this issue.
.
"It is relatively easy to calculate the growth rate needed to get today’s population from Noah’s three sons and their wives, after the Flood. With the Flood at about 4,500 years ago, it needs less than 0.5% per year growth.6 That’s not very much."
.
"The standard exponential model of population growth is as follows:
N = N0e kt
where N = the population size at time t, N0 is the population size at time 0, and k = the growth rate. Importantly, this formula should only be applied to large populations".
.
Hopefully now you will repent, and resolve to follow the Holy Bible.
There were no dinosaurs back then, there were only Dragons. Dinosaur names didn't happen until the 19th century
They All were There! The names came later.
@@albertroach7130 - Nonsense. There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils. Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them.
Amazing and so informatively convincing. Thank You.
NOAH, was also known as Ziusudra, and a few other names ... Ziusudra was also one of Enki's Sons, and Anunnaki.
Wrong. satan copies God.
With all due respect to narrators, the flood happened before the continents were divided!
What about a seed? There was seed bearing plants and trees, and when a seed dropped to the ground we know what happens before it's growth.
What is your question?
@@SalvableRuin I asked the question questions, where are your answers? But nevertheless I will ask again. What about a seed from a seed bearing tree or plant? I asked because you said there wasn't any death.
@@SalvableRuin I also asked, where in the Holy scriptures did God tell man to kill and eat animals and when did man first eat the flesh of and animal? That is what I asked. Waiting
Sorry you had to wait so long. Just now found this video and read the comments. Answer to your last question is Genesis 9:3 - "Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. I have given you all things, even as the green herbs." That is the place in Holy Scriptures where God gave man PERMISSION to kill and eat animals. This is after Noah, his family, and all the animals get off the Ark after the flood waters recede.
The first animal death I can find recorded is Genesis 3:21 where God made tunics of skin to clothe Adam and Eve after they ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil after being deceived by the serpent early in chapter 3. This is known as the "fall of man" and God then pronounces judgment on Adam, Eve, the serpent, and all creation later in chapter 3. Romans 8:22 comments on this saying "the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now." as a result of Adam and Eve's disobedience and resulting judgment.
We know from Genesis 4 that Adam's son, Abel, was bringing the firstborn of his flock as an offering to God so animal death continued to occur after the fall of man. Shortly after that, the first murder is recorded when Cain killed his brother Abel out of jealousy. Genesis 6 describes how evil man had become, which is why God chose to send a worldwide flood to destroy "all flesh in which is the breath of life". While the Bible does not state explicitly when man started eating animals, we do know that was not God's intent and that was probably a small part of the evilness of man.
That takes me to your question about seeds. By God's definition, plants don't die since they are not flesh and do not have the breath of life in them.
If you have other questions, I highly recommend a visit to the Ark Encounter in Williamstown, KY. It is a Biblically scaled Noah's ark loaded with teaching to answer almost any questions you might have. I would love to have you be my guest at the Ark. I can provide you with a free pass for you and a guest. I will just need your names and an email address. Reading Genesis chapters 1 through 11 would also be a great investment of your time.
The purpose of the Ark was to save Noah, whom God found to be righteous, his family, and 2 to 14 representatives of Biblical animal kinds to replenish the earth after the flood. Salvation from the flood was also available to any other people who chose to enter the Ark before God closed the door in Genesis 7:16. No one besides Noah's family chose to enter the Ark of Salvation and all of them perished in the world-wide flood. The Bible teaches there is another judgment coming. And just like the flood of Noah, God is providing a way to escape judgment. This time it is through the sacrificial death of His Son, Jesus Christ on the cross on Good Friday and His glorious resurrection on Easter. Everyone has the opportunity, but everyone has to make a choice. Just like with the flood, there will come a time when it will be too late. No one but God knows when this judgment will come. However, it was about 2000 year from Creation to the Flood, about 2000 years from the Flood to Jesus' resurrection, and about 2000 years from his resurrection until today. The clock is ticking. If you would like more information on what accepting Jesus' free gift of salvation looks like, I would be glad to share that with you or anyone else who is interested.
THIS IS IN TRUTH ENLARGED THE PLANET 🌎
I remember telling bible stories to kids when they were young. After telling the story of the flood, my daughter asked me why God would kill everyone on earth like that. My answer was because they had become too evil and were beyound repentance. Then she asked, " Even the babies?"
I never looked at bible stories the same after that.
@@JC-sj2pd No, I think life is a miracle and abortion is murder.
I'd say God alone is the one who grants life and he alone has the right to take it away. As for babies God will be ready to accept them all into heaven that have not reached a level of accountability and understanding for our corrupted sinful nature.
@@vampirehunter533 I appreciate your reply, but I'm sorry, I don't believe anything justifies the killing of babies or any innocent life.
I don't believe this story. It does not jive with a loving parent.
Out of the mouth of babes
Every tree that produces bad fruit will be cut down and thrown in to the fire. God is not playing around.
If all sea life was killed, where did all the current sea life come From? Whales, sharks. Dolphins, Manta rays, all fish, etc.
The Bible said killed everything on Land most sea animals could still survive cause that’s their natural habitat.
It rained 40 days and 40 nights
I rained real hard.
Love how 4 billion years of time is shortened to about a year there would be tons of evidence to show this rapid change yet nothing ever has been found showing this rapid changes anywhere ever
Yes there is , you simply dont want to know . There is no doubt multiple layers were laid down rapidily , so fast that some species , like mastadons still had vegitation still in their mouths and stomachs , not even fully digested , AND their flesh preserved due to rapid burial , not in " millions upon millions " of years ago . You just are not looking . The flood happened just like the Biblw says .
@@adrianojames7903 the Bible is viage ans if you do research you will be upset when you realize im correct. Its ok if your mind is shallow we really don't need your opinion and don't care to hear it either
@@matthewhenson2585 No I wont . I can tell you from personal experience how the Bible is true . I Love God's Word , number one , its Active and Living .
For example , I can read of a King named Nebuchanezzar who , the Bible says , before it even took place , would come and take the jewish people captive , destroy their temple , and take gold goblets , silver , everything in this temple to Babylon .
Now if the Bible is not true , like you ignorantly state , then none of what I just wrote would be true .
No King named Nebuchadnezzar, no temple destoyed in 686 BC , no city named Babylon . But guess what you will find if you decide to put aside your " i refuse to believe any of this nonsense " and actually look for yourself ?
BINGO . Yep . All the above history confirms .
Lets use a smaller example , just for kicks about a year ago , I was reading in Revelations chapter 2 , where , none other than Jesus Himself mentioned "satans throne" in pergamon , I googled it just for kicks . I always thought this passage was figurtive , NOPE , its for real
, but i encourage you to google it yourself . I realize you wont look , because you arent interested in anything that proves yo are wrong , thats the way we all are , prideful , no one likes to be shown they are wrong . But this simply proves the Bible is not just some type of book that has cute stories that are myths , but it reveals a God who knows the beginning from the end , and therefore when He speaks , His words are "living and active." One more then i am finished , if the Bible is false , when I read just this past week and googled whether or not the "Oil and Wine" Jesus spoke about in the parable of the Good Samaritan has any benefits to heal a wound , YEP , you guessed right ! It does
Or there is the time I googled the "4 winds on the earth " mentioned in the book of Revelations , BADA BING !!! you just hit the jackpot . You can claim all you want the bible is not true , you will never convince me of anything like that because the Bible says , " Let every man be found a liar , but God be true."
That would include you and I and anybody on 2 feet except Jesus .
@@adrianojames7903 fact the Bible was written by man
Totally agree, and please explain again, what happened to the then human races bones?? Were they here at tge same time as the dinosaurs? If so, how could the flood pick and choose only human bones, to be destroyed and lost, without a trace?
I don't think I've ever seen such a disparity in beauty between the video and the message as in this video. So much beautiful science used in the name of proving science wrong.
The fact many cultures talk about a flood tells that something big happened wich might be the thawt of the last clacial period icesheets
Great documentary
This isn't a documentary. This is a retelling of creationist religious fiction.
"In Science and Creationism, The National Academy of Sciences states unequivocally that creationism has no place in any science curriculum at any level."
Direct quote from the National Academy of Sciences
I believe it..
Oh to be young again and have the opportunity to learn Creation from Biblical perspective. I imagine you’ve studied this many, many years. What you put together here, and fly through in explanation, I would love to really understand! Thank you.
It’s real hard to understand. God did it. Magic.
@@chrisbrooks4032 At least someone IS actually responsible for it.
@@chrisbrooks4032 the part about magic doesn't work, but God manipulating the ocean water, tsunami, and heavy rain from the sky for 40 days and nights, that would be more plausible.
They have been repeating this disinformation since the 1950's, how old are you?
May I suggest that you study real science and not religious mythology. None of this actually happened. It’s just a children’s story.
Great video. I highly recommend everyone watch this.
To me, the great flood in the days of Noah explains all that we find it the world today. Based on many of the comments I read from others, they didn't really watch the entire video or they just pick and choose what to hear and see. There are several books written by earth science people, that talk about the great flood, and explain it in much the same manner as this video. You either believe or you don't.
And most of these books are written by creationist, many not even having an accredited degree.
Uh Oh! Bible chronology puts the flood around 2450 BC. Ancient history around the Nile river goes well back (continuously) before 5000 BC. Might want to return to the drawing board.
And Does ANYONE Really Believe this...??..
Sadley a lot do. 🙄
Even sadder, many more don't.
If you believe Kamala Harris will make a good president, then I'm not surprised you believe this
Dr Baugh has shown conclusive special x-ray proof of dinosaur prints pressed over with human footprints. I'm only half way through this presentation, so perhaps, hopefully, this will be addressed shortly ...
Baugh was a "Dr" of nothing. His educational claims came from either nonexistent schools or unaccredited Bible schools. Supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and carvings. The largest number of "man tracks" are forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, a somewhat human shape often results. Other alleged "man tracks" including purely erosional features (often selectively highlighted to encourage human shapes), indistinct marks of undetermined origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved tracks (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock).
Yup dinosaur where real creatures some bones found created by the nephlim rest is a cover up like you said Smithsonian collects all evidence with the past including tall skeleton buriels people found farming so nobody could keep evidence. All sounds crazy but today normal is a lie crazy conspiracies theories have all been true lately in last 4 months
Aside from the fact that Baugh was a Dr. of nothing (his alleged degrees were from imaginary colleges and one unaccredited bible college) those "footprints" were baloney. Although genuine dinosaur tracks are abundant in Texas, claims of human tracks have not withstood close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been largely abandoned even by most creationists. Alleged Paluxy "man tracks" involve a variety of spurious phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and indistinct markings of unknown origin.
The only thing I really dislike about this documentary, is that there’s literally no time to read the slides as they fly by. I know I can pause and RW/FF, but I’m just saying.
That's kinda the whole point. This is an electronic equivalent of a "Gish Gallop". No time to think - you just sit back and get indoctrinated.
Wow, this all happened at around 6,000 years ago. And how old are the fossils?
Excellent and well done!
God is amazing, he planed it all out .
Flood was caused by a gravitational pull not God. Crazy people think God is a real person, same religion that invented God created the book of Satan to divide humanity, same purpose they wanted to achieve with the flat earth theory all to cause division.
@@clowns8421
Your name is very fitting.
Your God is a narcissist
AWESOME VIDEO, SHORT AND VERY INFORMATIVE. LUV IT!
Plus according to the Bible the flood was only 25 ft deep. That wouldn't even cover a small hill
John 1:12
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Remember the high mountain ranges of today didn't exist then. How could they as tectonic plate movement wasn't a thing before the flood? Plus the atmosphere was healthier then thus causing healthier plants. It's all in Genesis. Study up. The freaking meteorite theory is crushed in my opinion with this. There's human tracks in some places along side of dinosaur tracks. It seems God wanted to send a reminder of the Flood. Thanks for whoever came out with this. It's exactly what my mind saw when I studied Scriptures in the book of Genesis years ago. God bless you.
That's interesting. I enjoy fantasy.
All nonsense. Get some education and don´t tell fairy tales as history.
@@MrWeezer55 then you must really enjoy mainstream biology and geology!
@@phillipgray7371 Why not? Facts are awesome, too!
@@MrWeezer55 the fact is there's layers there's fossils there's coal oil and gas there's mountains with fossils on top there's great Canyons there's wind gaps water gaps folds and binds poly straight fossils there's many facts but it's how the facts get interpreted the flood recorded in Genesis best explains all these facts
Fine work of satire
you didnt listen at all did you?
@@estebanleacho9315 don't you recognize sarcasm?
So if noah took two off every animal and this documentary say dinosaur excited in that time y didn't noah take dinosaurs in the ark?
God commanded or brought which animals He wanted to enter the Ark. Original Hebrew reads "Two by two they went to Noah into the Ark male and female as had commanded God. Sometimes the proper explanation of scripture should be read from the original Hebrew and not from what man has interpreted to mean.
What makes you think there were no dinosaurs in the ark?
Good question, yes young (thus smaller) dinosaurs were brought. 2 of each kind as instructed. And there was plenty of room. See SFT's detailed response which explains this by searching: The Epic Destruction of Aron Ra's Flood Series
These creatures weren't created by God. Outside entities interfered with His creation; thus arose giants and other creatures not sanctioned by Him. First book of Enoch.
Yes, as juveniles. Two of each kind of unclean creature's and seven of ever clean kind, all most likly a year of age and without blemish.
1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water?
2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from?
3. After the flood, where did the water go?
4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank.
5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark?
6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour.
7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood.
9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species.
10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife.
11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated.
12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood.
13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions.
a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded?
b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb?
c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost.
Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018
I can’t answer all your objections, but I’ll start with the major one - the timeline.
The Septuagint (the greek translation of the OT from 250bc) has a different genealogical timeline than the Catholic/Protestant one. It places the flood around 4000BC which provides just enough time for the survivors to grow numerous enough to build the Tower of Babel and then found the earliest civilizations - Sumer, Egypt, and Indus River - around 3100bc which is around when they were thought to have started.
@@ktrimbach5771 Sorry but that too is nonsense. There would still not be enough time for humans to repopulate the world with diverse cultures and languages or for the plant and animal species to diversify from the species on the Arc.
@@walkergarya literally just a "nuh-uh"
The earthquakes during the deluge magnetosphere collapse pole shift were over 30 on the scale some up 50 on scale
So, is this video suggesting that Noah's flood is how the Dinosaurs were destroyed?
Yes
Single asteroid theory is illogical, although asteroid strikes may have been part of this judgment
Yes,most of them were.
@@fzr1000981 - It's only illogical if you know practically nothing of the widespread evidence.
@plainsman there is evidence of a mass extinction event but not caused by a single asteroid
AMEN The TRUTH IN JESUS NAME AMEN
Thank you for this informative post! I am a Christian & believe the Bible to be the inerrant Word of God. I enjoyed the video very much!
Interesting story. Fiction is always a fun topic. And this one was pretty cool.
What bit did you think was fictional, was there something he presented you think is particularly false? Would be good to understand what information you have on the topic.
@@mdl2427The entire video.
@@abel3557 Cool, so explain why there are 'cold' slabs of rock the size of tectonic plates all around the core of the earth and if they're millions of years old they haven't reach equilibrium with the temperature of the rest of the core? Plus how they're even in shape and haven't fully merged with the rest of the core.
@@mdl2427 There are no "cold" slabs of rock. There are massive ancient "graveyards" of continental slabs due to the hot and viscous mantle and dense rocks causing plate subduction.
In addition, your first question revolves around the model of a uniform mantle( even layers of the earth as shown in school diagrams) when that's not what it looks like.
In real models, we know there are areas of depression and deep magma channels, leading to certain areas being hotter.
The subduction of plates usually creates a pocket which may be of lower temperature than the average temperature of most of the mantle, but it's not a large difference.
@@mdl2427 These ancient plates won't fuse with the core because they don't go anywhere near the core. The core is a hyper dense area, and materials of larger densities generally sink. And this sinking is stopped at the center of mass of the earth. Gravity holds things in place, hence why the dense core is ball shaped.
What you need to understand is that these ancient plates are different materials from the mantle and core, and they're far less dense than the core.
Oceanic plates however, are dense enough to subduct into the mantle.
Our continents are too "buoyant due to low density, and they don't subduct into the upper mantle.