Personally I don't care much about the term itself, I don't deal with disrespect, arrogant, selfish, self-serving, immoral people. In terms of this what I will say is many men concerned themselves with women who have these aforementioned 'qualities' but should not. Women who act this way are vocal so you know what they are about thus not much of a concern. Instead there are those are against this and on the side of the polar opposite of these, on your side so to speak, but sadly just a mask, don't be fooled though because they are cunning and smart they know exactly what they are doing. Of course behavioral science will have you know which is which... men do the same, this 'feminist movement' have nothing to do with feminism and if this movement is not addressed a decade from now society will be the reflection of whatsoever the choice was people made. I do not live in the US nor Europe, we do not have social problems of this nature. We value tradition, we choose to be supportive, not hurl imprecations which start with division and hatred which leads to contempt and eventually attrition and a fractured society. Often times the signature is decline in relationships (male/female) and for that matter marriage.
We generally prefer "descriptive definitions" that attempt to capture the way *most* people use a term, as opposed to "prescriptive definitions" that rely on some subject matter authority, as the latter approach tends to sow confusion in discourse among the laity. The most concise descriptive definition of feminism I've ever heard comes from the economist Bryan Caplan, who records the definition as "the view that society generally treats men more fairly than women". I think this definition is really good. I can ask basically anyone whether or not their society generally treats men more fairly than women, from most recent-ish time periods, in most countries, and their answer will tell me with extreme accuracy whether or not they self-identify as a feminist.
Feminism has nothing to do with appearance or anything else. Guys can be feminists too. All you have to do is support freedom, and not stand against it. It's a tall order, you find many people who say they are all for freedom, when pressed, actually stand against freedom, and want to impose their morals, religion, rules, customs, norms, or laws upon others. They may stand for freedom when you are like them or for freedom for themselves, but for people or groups or niches or people with kinks or quirks or mindsets not like them... they are dead set against those people having freedom.
Thanks for the giggle.
Is this parody?
Personally I don't care much about the term itself, I don't deal with disrespect, arrogant, selfish, self-serving, immoral people. In terms of this what I will say is many men concerned themselves with women who have these aforementioned 'qualities' but should not. Women who act this way are vocal so you know what they are about thus not much of a concern. Instead there are those are against this and on the side of the polar opposite of these, on your side so to speak, but sadly just a mask, don't be fooled though because they are cunning and smart they know exactly what they are doing. Of course behavioral science will have you know which is which... men do the same, this 'feminist movement' have nothing to do with feminism and if this movement is not addressed a decade from now society will be the reflection of whatsoever the choice was people made. I do not live in the US nor Europe, we do not have social problems of this nature. We value tradition, we choose to be supportive, not hurl imprecations which start with division and hatred which leads to contempt and eventually attrition and a fractured society. Often times the signature is decline in relationships (male/female) and for that matter marriage.
We generally prefer "descriptive definitions" that attempt to capture the way *most* people use a term, as opposed to "prescriptive definitions" that rely on some subject matter authority, as the latter approach tends to sow confusion in discourse among the laity. The most concise descriptive definition of feminism I've ever heard comes from the economist Bryan Caplan, who records the definition as "the view that society generally treats men more fairly than women".
I think this definition is really good. I can ask basically anyone whether or not their society generally treats men more fairly than women, from most recent-ish time periods, in most countries, and their answer will tell me with extreme accuracy whether or not they self-identify as a feminist.
So a synonym for historically ignorant, then? In what society at what point in time was the AVERAGE Man treated more fairly than the AVERAGE Woman?
@@ylnotixe if I may illustrate my point, let me ask you a question. Would you consider yourself a feminist?
Feminism has nothing to do with appearance or anything else.
Guys can be feminists too. All you have to do is support freedom, and not stand against it.
It's a tall order, you find many people who say they are all for freedom, when pressed, actually stand against freedom, and want to impose their morals, religion, rules, customs, norms, or laws upon others. They may stand for freedom when you are like them or for freedom for themselves, but for people or groups or niches or people with kinks or quirks or mindsets not like them... they are dead set against those people having freedom.
Not all freedom is good
@@VirginiaNative1646 It is for me.
@@VirginiaNative1646 ruclips.net/video/kDQ0szQi8AA/видео.html