Extra Firepower for Vietnam: the Aussie "B!tch"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 дек 2023
- All the best firearms history channels streaming to all major devices:
weaponsandwar.tv
Many of the special forces groups that operated during the Vietnam War found they standard issue weapons a but unwieldy for use in confined jungle environments. They also found a need for something that could deliver an immediate large volume of fire to break contact during an ambush (or deliver an ambush of their own). The Australians were no exception, and with the typical Special Forces attitude towards customization a few guys made some improvements to what they were issued...
What we have today is a recreation (by Mark Graham of ARS, build on a DSA semiauto receiver) of an Australian L1A1 with its flash hider cut down and a second pistol grip mounted to the barrel. The real examples of these often had rather shorter barrels, and ones that began life as semiauto L1A1 rifles were typically converted to fully automatic (some began as L2A1 automatic rifles and did not require this extra step). Fitted with a large LMG magazine, they could deliver a lot of firepower in a very short time; just the ticket for a small jungle patrol.
Special thanks to Bear Arms in Scottsdale, AZ for providing access to this rifle for video!
utreon.com/c/forgottenweapons/
/ forgottenweapons
www.floatplane.com/channel/For...
Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! shop.forgottenweapons.com
Contact:
Forgotten Weapons
6281 N. Oracle 36270
Tucson, AZ 85740
“A very short, full-auto, .308 calibre, flash & blast, concussion inducing Bitch”
One of the greatest quotes of the century.
... i should call her
Knowing Australian tendencies, I feel like the actual Aussie name is probably a different impolite word, starting with a C.
@@atomic_wait And ending with an unt.
@@danielschroedinger2090 DANIEL NO!!!
@@atomic_wait As an aussi I can confirm calling this thing the bitch is frankly most polite thing I can think of
Ian, I volunteer at the SAS Historical centre and can give you some info on the Bitch. Firstly, we did have a empty mag hold open, dont know where you got the info from that we didnt. It was called the Bitch because after its first firing, the shooters response was that it kicked and sounded like a bitch. We have many "Bitches" and others on display for the public to handle. We also have a 40mm grenade launcher shortened to a pistol, plus the patrol member who carried it on patrol is a volunteer as well.
If youre ever in Perth, Western Australia. Youre welcome to visit the display. Allow a day as its quite large.
Kicked shmicked. In good to reasonable condition they were a smooth operating
unit. Having said that, there were rare (abused) examples that were harsh.
You americans just cant get it right can you?.Australia's Small arms factory at lithgow had lots of experimental weapons that our special forces could draw on for inspiration.Your M14 probably was not much on an influence.We have had our own armament factory for a long time here We build a highly improved Styer Aug and numerous other weapons .Check out their museum.You will be amazed what they invented or modified since their inception.World class.
Whoa, take a chill pill mate and read my text. Im an Aussie, served in the army and am trained in many weapons including the SLR and Austeyr. I don't know what you're carrying on about. @@richardthompson3791
Just commenting on what I was told by people who fired it@@MrCanonballs
Yeah. No worries. Just because I never heard anyone call it a "Bitch" or "The Bitch" does not mean that it did not happen.
I am puzzled about it though... as I never heard any soldier say anything negative about the weapon, and the fact that as long as the things were in reasonable condition they were excellent to use... and the recoil was quite smooth... possibly because the rather heavy breach block absorbed a lot of the recoil energy... perhaps the person you spoke to about it had the gas adjusted incorrectly. Maybe he fell over one day and had the flash suppressor spear up his arse and exclaimed; Bitch!!! But that would kinda make him the "bitch" wouldn't it?
My entire platoon was trained (at Wagga Wagga) to use the SLR by two SAS corporals... so I s'pose there's a possibility that others training
wasn't as refined. Having said that, as far as I know, those two supermen
trained every company of recruits that came through basic training
at Wagga Wagga at that time.
And let me tell you this; by the time
we (all of us) graduated out of basic training to corp training; if you were the target and within 300 metres, and in sight, there would be a 100% chance you'd have a bullet in your chest 100 times out of 100... I digress.
Then at corp training nobody called it "Bitch", and later nobody called it bitch in my unit either. @@derekwebster5385
All Australian Soldiers of the L1A1 era knew how to turn a semi into an Auto with nothing more than a matchstick from a ration pack.
My uncle was from that era and told me the exact same thing
He did say you had to be careful not to melt anything when you did that though…
He was actually an extra in the movie the odd angry shot, the extras had a bus crash when heading to the film set so they grabbed some guys from the local army barracks to fill in one day
The spider fighting scene has genuine Aussie solders playing the extras
@@johnnytower6169 love that story. Was just thinking the other day I need to break out that movie again. One of the best war movies ever
As did the British squaddies
@@johnnytower6169I am not sure about the match stick but the reason it is so easy to convert the FAL family to full auto is because military FALs almost always have the safety sear (prevents hammer follow). In the US, with the exception of a few FALs which were grandfathered-in specifically by serial number, all FALs which have safety sears (or even the cutout for them in the receiver) are considered machine guns by the ATF even if the selector switch is blocked from moving to the A position.
It definately has the best ending. It stuck with me for over 40 years.@@ramcat5137
Anecdotally, the easy modification to enable fully automatic fire on the SLR was to use a matchstick to disable the interruptor. This did make them full-auto only, but was able to be done by less special forces in the field and could be surreptitiously uninstalled before handing your firearm back to the unit armourer.
Better hide your dog…
That sounds like inviting hammer follow.
YES I was told that 2001
@@GunFunZSFrom what I've gathered even the semi auto L1s had an auto/safety sear.
So no worries about follow on.
I honestly think that matchstick story is a myth. You can easily make a SLR/FAL full auto by removing the fire selector
Precision fire solves a lot of problems, Volume of Fire solves a lot of problems at point blank range
Your enemy can't fight back if there is nothing left.
There isn't a range where volume of fire isn't effective though.
@@ekscalyburvolume of fire not working? More volume! :)
Volume of Fire at point blank range tends to very quickly make problems reassess their desire to be problems.
"Precision fire can solve a problem, automatic fire can solve a lot of problems."
It’s like the Aussies saw the yank’s M14 fire in full auto and we’re like: “nah, she needs more muzzle tilt” and made this. Aptly named btw
Watch your mouth Ian
Close; I reckon it was more like "Yeah nah, this c*nt can do better. Oi! Jay-mo! Still got that metal file? You bloody legend, we's gonna have her fixed up right in no time."
What does the M14 & American women have in common? The lack of rod worth mentioning 😂
@@biggredd2092 I can see why, apparently we were out rodding everyone *elses* women 😂
Ah the best fire selector design. And the Aussie peal back tecjnique.
Knowing the Aussies, it's a miracle this thing wasn't called the C-word
Trust me we still did call them that
Sorry mate, she's a little old for that name. We didn't really start using the word c#nt until around the mid 90's.😂😂😂
Cockato?
The C-word wasn't used anywhere near as much back then as it is today
"Cobber"? 🤔😜
Once upon a time, nearly 50 years ago, when I was an Army Cadet here in Western Australia, I was one of the few who got a tour of some of the SAS workshops at Campbell Barracks, adjacent to the Swanbourne rifle range where we were training with worn out .303 SMLE and Bren.
The gun carriers being built at the Barracks were based an Land Rover chassis but beyond that, almost unrecognizable with crazy engines and gun mounts for various machine guns.
IIRC everything built was written off once deployed. Nobody in the SAS risked their attributes trying to rescue equipment.
And there was I, a cadet with a rifle older than my father.
As part of the NZ Cadet Force (ATC) I got to fire an SLR at the age of 18 all 5'2" 59kg of me - lovely gun (oh I grew another 2.5 inches in the next 3 years LOL)
We were still using worn out Enfields and Bren when I was in cadets in the 80s in the UK. They introduced a single shot SA-80 just as I was leaving it. Had this big clumpy handle thing on it.
Yep - my time in the ACF in the 80's we had old SMLE's and a Bren which we never got a chance to fire but trained on assembly/disassembly. The we got the single shot cadet SA80 which fell apart the moment it fell over. Bloody pile of shite.
I remember shooting .303s at Swanbourne range for the inter unit (school) shooting competition. At the time my school had 100 "blank firing" 303s (i.e. barrel shot to pieces), 26 live firing 303s (mine was letter T) and two Bren guns stored in a shed. As the competition was on weekend I was issued with .303 to take home (I was 16 at the time) so caught the bus home with the rifle slung over my shoulder. No-one looked twice. How things have changed.
We used to have SAS troopers as instructors on our NCO courses, which was interesting. At these we got to fire SLRs (L1A1), ARs (L2A1 LMG) and F1 SMGs. On our annual camp we usually just shot 303s and Bren guns. We also did range days at Bushmead rifle range, which is now suburb.
@@ForestRacer1958 You lucky bastard. I was in the cadets in the 2000s, and all we ever got to shoot were the old .22-converted Lee-Enfields. I would have loved to fire some more interesting weapons...
I was in the Australian Cadet Force from 1969-72. The FAL as you call it was always referred to as the SLR (Self Loading Rifle).
The L1A1 SLR was designed using Imperial measurements and has some differences from the standard FN FAL. A significant change from the original FN FAL was that the L1A1 SLR operates in semi-automatic mode only.
Was called the SLR here in NZ too
I reckon all across the Commonwealth, the regular soldier was calling it the SLR. I know we Brits did.
Aww...It's like a family reunion! Except for the rebellious colonies of course.
@@AdamOwenBrowningIn Canada, lots of the vets I spoke to called it the FN.
We (Canadian Army) call that "dump a mag and fall back" manoeuvre the Aussie Peelback. Now I know the gun that originated from, so thanks for that.
Just a C-2 with the bi-pod replaced with a pistol grip
@@pdxyyz4327 C1 no C2
Cool!
"Australian Peel" elsewhere means everyone fires, one guy yells "Peeling!" and falls back, then keeps shooting from a more distant position, then the second guy does the the same, then the third, then fourth, etc. etc. The idea is to give the impression to the enemy that rather than retreating, more reinforcements are being brought up.
We are a bunch of devious bastards.
@@azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401 It's fully automatic, so it's a C-2. Canada went semi-automatic on the C-1.
it was known as the Tunnel of Love when I was in the Aus Army, same as US/Can/UK lads calling forward abseiling Australian Rappelling.
I just want to say thanks to all of the Aussies in the comments who've shared their stories! Very great to read, cheers to you guys!
Can't see it anywhere in the comments, but the boys that came after the SLR was retired called it the Elephant Gun.
Because they were training on AUG plastic coated 5.56.@@civillad. I trained on it and loved it, cause when you swapped out from carrying the M60 on a route march, it was sooo light 😉
Usually the Americans and their communication companies don't like mentioning Australia because they call us every time and that would mean America's probably not as capable as they make out. So very good to hear you're compliment appreciate that
I was one of those ‘SASR’ armourers and I test fired both the Bitch and the Beast as part of the annual non-technical inspection. The muzzle flash coming of that thing could have started a bush fire, and just a tad loud.
A WO at holsworthy in the 80s told me it was 'for making a great big fuck off kind of noise' due to the cut down barrel to scare down a contact and break away.
@@petercarter6261 SASR used it like that to give the impression there was more of them then actually was.
Exactly, it wasn't the standard issue SLR used in a battallion but a field mod by SASR armourers for just that purpose@@micksmith-vt5yi
Yea spoke to a SASR Vietnam guy once at a RSL when Grandfather was alive who was a WW2 Vet.
Get some good stories from those Vets.
Their tactics were either go in silently and undetected as best can or go in loudly and with that SLR mod it made it seem was more men in the unit then actually was and confuse the enemy it was a larger force attacking then actually was.
@@micksmith-vt5yi yep, a great big f*&k off kind of noise so we can scarper back into the jungle
In WW2, in the jungles of Papua New Guinea, the Aussies learned to love a short-barrelled, full auto with front pistol grip that can dump a shed ton of lead at whatever you’re going after.
The jungle doctrine of peeling back after making contact while on patrol also dates back to WW2. My grandfather was a bren gunner through most of the tropical, south pacific conflicts in WW2 and they just didn't stick around on patrols, they'd come across the Japanese. Hose them up as best they could and move back to a rendezvous point, reload, check everyone was there, in one piece and either set an ambush if pursued or just document the contact point and move elsewhere on the route.
It tended to fray the nerves of the enemy and if the enemy took casualties it effectively removed them from the area because by that stage, they didn't know if it was 10 guys or a whole platoon. Likewise in a jungle, its real easy to get a lot of people in a very small area and not know how many there are, like maybe it was a Japanese patrol or it was the leading tip of a whole company 50metres ahead of them.
As someone who has done jungle warfare training in that God-awful helhole called "Tully", I can confirm this as absolutely accurate.
Unlike shooting in the jungle.
A Thompson? Or a Frankenstein version of a standard issue.
@@krissteel4074dude that’s literally how almost all combat happens. It’s how you hunt. It’s how humans kill things.
@@davidkershaw5379 To quote more than one knowledgeable source: "arguably the best sub-machine gun of ww2, of which there were no complaints from the soldiers to whom it was issued." The Owen Gun.
Ian has a couple of videos. A *really* old one shooting it and a more recent one discussing and dismantling it.
A guy my dad worked with was a Vietnam vet. He co-wrote a book about his experiences. It is called Crossfire: An Australian Reconnaissance Unit in Vietnam. In it he describes beginning his deployment with an Owen, but, after joining the recon platoon, making his own weapon by putting a heavy barrel on his SLR and modifying the sear to give him full-auto fire. He called it the "slaughtermatic."
The other co-author wrote the absolutely not-to-be-missed book Trackers: The Untold Story of the Australian Dogs of War (which I once wrote a screenplay for on the off-chance that I might somehow convince some lunatic to put up a few million to produce). I cannot over-recommend Trackers. It is brilliant and so is the main real-life protagonist, Caesar.
I read this book years ago. I think I still have it. Curse you for making me want to dig many boxes of old books.
Always on the lookout for good reads, thanks for the recommendation.
It is a great Book and story .
Trackers is a great read, I absolutely recommend it also.
I know both men. Peter is a volunteer at our Museum and gives talk about his experiences to school excursions. Robert was my old Training WO and is active in the RSL here. Both are legends.
My friend was an armourer in Vietnam and he told me that he did exactly what you just spoke of. About 15 - 20 years ago, after he had retired, he went to the SAS barracks in Perth and enquired about his modified SLR as there was one mounted on the wall. He was pleased to hear that the very rifle he modified was still being used for training purposes. Steve Chapman was the gentleman's name, he was a proud soldier and a very good friend. RIP Steve. Lest we forget.
When you are in Australia, you should check out the Australian War Memorial, the Lithgow Small Arms Factory and the Infantry Museum in Singleton. They would most likely have this rifle in their collections.
I know Singo has a bullpup SLR and M16 prototype I'm sure Ian would be rather keen to get his grubby mitts on. :D
Many Air Cadet squadrons still retain deactivated L1A1s to use for drill. Though this version would be altogether rarer.
I was once the manager of the Infantry Museum at Singleton (not to be confused with the Curator ... he had the real hands on job of running the museum: it is a priceless collection of artifacts and a must-see for anyone visiting or living in the Hunter Valley Region).
While you are at it, the Huey on display says it was used by 3 RAR in the Solomon Islands in 2003. 2 RAR not 3 RAR deployed in 2003. 3RAR did not deploy until 2005.@@MegaPeedee
@@TheWamjet Thinking back, that may have been what my brother had as a RAAF cadet at ADFA 25-ish years ago. I remember it being basically the same as what Ian's got here, except much shorter and without the extra pistol grip. The bolt was absent when he let me handle it - I'm not sure if it the rifle would still work at all with its bolt, but he did say that the frequent cleaning drills basically trashed the weapons' functionality.
So hey, fair chance I've handled a weapon that Ian wishes he could get his hands on. Never expected that.
Small point of order, the L1A1 was generally referred to in Australian service as the SLR ('Self Loading Rifle'). Yes, it's an FN-FAL restricted to semi-auto fire (well, bar modifications like the one above), but that's what our troops referred to it as.
Fuckin’ luv me SLR cheers
It was called the same (SLR) in UK service. Not officially but in regular usage.
Same in Indian Army service
So all we’ve established is that all British and British dominion countries called their rifles SLR 😂 brilliant
@@corditesniffer8020 FAL really is a misnomer for L1A1 SLRs because they were not automatic rifles. SLR was a generic term that was applied to other nation's rifles if they were similar - any semi auto type battle rifle.
Best comment I ever heard on full auto FALs: “first shot’s on target; second is 6” above, and anything after that is anti aircraft fire”
I’d love to see if the vertical front grip made any difference to that.
When fired from the hip, yes. It's easier to keep it forced down like that. Heck, it's easier to keep rifles with no front grip down if you fire from the hip too.
Watch the movie Platoon for an idea of what jungle combat was like in Vietnam. 20 or 30 feet away muzzle climb doesn't matter too much.
correct on full auto it was firing into the tree tops almost uncontrolabel had to step backwards when i did the full auto simpel remove the fire selector and it will shoot full auto but useless only spending ammo we carried 6 mags 19 per mag
No that is not true, when i was a national service man in the SADF i worked in the base pharmacy and got my hands on some ammo by virtue of the gunsmith being next door, one weekend pass i smuggled the rifle out of base (if they caught me i would have been in deep poo poo) took it to the farm with a full mag tracer every 3rd/4th round for special effect, sat one knee down in the hollow of a grassland valley held it to my waist and solidly gripped the barrel guard with my left hand and dumped the twenty round mag (or the larger part of it) up the grassy valley meadow! I am talking 1981 now. I was amazed at the relatively good controlability, i could feel the muzzle rise but not nearly as bad as i anticipated, in fact it was an absolute joy to shoot on full auto, but you had to be mindfull of controlability,if you had it against your shoulder 4-5 shot automatic bursts would be more advisable,the full power 308 round makes it more of a rapid fire battle rifle.
I read of one blue-on-blue encounter in Vietnam where an Australian SAS patrol bumped a Vietnamese militia patrol (commanded by a yank SF SGT) at night. The SAS first scout followed SOP's and 'dumped the mag' from his modified AR/L2A1 (no flash suppressor), and then 'exit stage rear' as per SOP's. Both sides called in arty which is when it was realised it was a blue-on-blue encounter.
There was an after action debrief where the SA and the SF SGT meet. During the debrief the SF SGT said there was so much noise and flash from the AR he thought they were been fired on by a 50 cal.
My Father served in Vietnam as an infantry radio operator with 9 RAR '68 - '69. Most RO's, scouts and officers carried the M16 due to it's lightness / automatic firepower. My Old Man preferred the 7.62 round over 5.56 as the heavier bullet would not be deflected by jungle foliage and could penetrate smaller tree trunks and ant hills with enough energy left over to penetrate the person hiding behind it.
One day, while being transported by APC he saw the crews L2A2 and had an idea. When he dismounted he had within his L1A1 SLR the moving parts from the L2A2. He figured he would see much more combat than the APC crew and his extra firepower would be more detrimental to the enemy while increasing his chance of survival.
When back at Nui Dat he scrounged a couple of 40 round mags and cannibalised a speargun, attaching its pistol grip to his front furniture with the rubber firing sling from the speargun and finally attaching a bipod.
His frankengun, Boom Boom B*tch served him well.
40 round mag ??
from my memory , the mag on the L2A1 were 30 round , and the only thing u needed to change on the L1A1 was the safety catch , it had a different profile allowing the gun to shoot semi auto or auto , I actually owned a L1A1 with a L2A1 safety setup , And yes a small bit of match stick under the sear would give u full auto , BUT full auto on a L1A1was a sure way to burn out a barrel very quickly , hence the L2A1 had a much heaver barrel , to help handle the heat I can say a L1A1 on full auto gets very hot very fast , and gets decidedly unmanageable just as fast .I am not sure regular army soldiers would have modified their L1A1's ,and gotten away with it , BUT armours for special forces ( SAS ) may have tricked up 1 or 2 specials , I have seen L1A1's with short barrels and the flash suppressor still on them
@@user-yn3ln7cs4c 100% correct about the barrel melting.
Years ago, when I was serving in Germany, I was good friends with the regimental armourer. Although the SLR was not my personal weapon, my armourer friend adapted one for me so that it fired full auto and used LMG 30 round mags. He had adapted one for his own use and another for a mutual friend who was a combat engineer. As an aside, when working in an urban environment, I happened to be in the infantry defence company armoury, when I espied an M16. I asked who used it and was told no one wanted it: all the infantrymen preferred to take out an SLR when on patrol. The armourer told me I could have it, if I wanted it. At the time I carried a Sterling in a canvas bag with the stock folded and the mag off, plus a Browning 9mm HP in a shoulder holster. Unfortunately, the M16 was too big for my canvas bag. Pity it wasn't a CAR 15, one of those might just about have fitted in.
I had the pleasure of using a converted and shortened SKS for some time that fired full auto and accepted AK mags. Ingenuity was more appreciated back in the old days before everyone got a stick implanted instead of a spine.
I take it that you were on Op Banner in the second part of the story? Where you saw an M16 and carried a SMG in a canvas bag and a Browning in a shoulder holster? Also not exactly in a standard rifle company or inf bn by the looks of it. Also having an armourer adapt an SLR for you is err a bit unorthodox and wouldn't be allowed in any BAOR unit I know of. Interesting and I understand if you can't give any more details.
@@Willy_Tepes I blame foreigners... and the gays
My Father was an officer in the Bundeswehr and the stuff you are telling would be completely forbidden.
@@blasterofmuppets4754 Sounds a lot like he wasn't regular lol
I had a friend whose father was in the Australian Army and he said that his dad always hated it whenever he was stationed at the base where the SASR are stationed because at the end of every shift he'd have to take a bunch of post-it notes off of the back of his uniform. The SASR guys would keep sneaking up behind people, putting post it notes on their back, and then sneaking away without them noticing as a joke.
BS
@@graemesydney38 possibly - I'm only repeating what was told to me.
does sound like a sascat sort of lark
@@theltlexay not to mention sharpening their sneak skill.
The stories I heard were more outlandish and wild. Stealing a helicopter from the flight line and taking it for a joy ride with a few of the lads.
Hey Bro! I'm an ex Australian soldier (of the Seventies) and I can assure you that the breach did have a locked open feature... in fact in the event of a stoppage, the drill that we were trained is :Cock LOCK Look (into the locked open breach)... to diagnose and clear a stoppage. Over the duration of my enlistment I had three L1A1s. One had done too many tours of SE Asia et al and was a rough example, an other was just a plain ol' good example and the third was an absolute gem that fired far more accurately and smoothly than any Self Loading Rifle should... it seemed to be a 1 in a 100,000 SLR.
Anyway sir, the breach block did LOCK open on Lithgow produced L1A1s.
I remember COCK LOCK AND LOOK too - there was a button on the side of the SLR which locked the breach open ... handy also when the NCO came around to ensure all weapons were clear at the end of a range shoot, IMT with blanks, etc.
100% ... The first Immediate Action was Cock, Lock and Look for right handers.... Me being a left hander had to roll the rifle over to cock it and look into the breach.
The second IA entailed Cock, Lock, Look, and turning down the gas plug if it weren't cycling correctly.... most of the ones from my era worked on 4... a bad one had a gas plug setting of Zero.
The NZ drill was Cock, Hook and Look. Same thing but different word. We also called it the SLR.
@@AllanRowland Yeah we called it the SLR too (Self Loading Rifle) Bro.
And I never heard anyone call it "The Bitch" and I don't know why anyone would call it "The Bitch" as it was easy to use, reliable, and accurate at battle range.
Tilt right, cock, lick, tilt left, look in ( late 80's early 90's training)🤣🤣 brings back fond memories👍
I knew an old timer Aussie who owned a bar locally and got himself a semi-auto FAL when he came to America because he served in the Australian Army in the Vietnam era. We got to talking one night and that’s how I found this out. Since I was a big gun guy and the business was real slow that evening, he brought it out to show me. So here I am looking over this FAL at a barstool and some hipster dudes walk in and about have a heart attack. Good times.
@@cris-rj5zf I don’t care if you think it’s bs. Was in Omaha a few years back.
Never clicked on a Forgotten Weapons video so fast😅
There are a few authentic examples of this weapon still around. As far as I know they are held by the Australian Special Air Service Regiment's museum in Australia.
Also in the armoury at RAEME Training Centre and Lithgow small arms factory.
Had a quick look and there is an article about Campbell Barracks (home of TAG West / SASR) having a display of a bunch of firearms- google 'inside SAS inner sanctum' and you can find an article from the Worst Australian about it
There’s one in the HMAS Cerberus museum, there’s a few treasures in there actually
I’ll bet Ian would have a field day over there
The SASR Museum inside Swanbourne now only has plastic-toy replicas for 'security', but there's an original Bitch hanging behind the Bar in the Sgts Mess.
In the mid 80' my serge, a Vietnam vet, told me that the VC in his area loved to acquire a SLR. He showed me how 'easy' it was to make the L1A1 full-auto. He was like some figure from myth, that man. Very important to me and how I have lived my life since then. Cheers to you Tony..
Now I want to watch The Odd Angry Shot again.
Knowing how the Australian Army works I'm pretty sure they would have been returned to original condition by the regimental armourers after the war, or stripped for spare parts. The idea that sixty years in the future they may be of historical interest wouldn't have been a consideration.
You mean the army works? :o
Who knew?
the only thing we kept around was that tank
@@ShadowHybrid92 That's because it was a war trophy, not issued equipment 🤣
I can't imagine full auto mag dumps being very conducive to a long service life, either.
They were more about living the next ten seconds.
Royal Australian Navy in the late 80s and as everyone else has said, we called it an SLR. We had the L1A1 Semi Autos and used to shoot them at the range up to 300m. Being Navy and not army, we left all the jungle silly buggers stuff to the Pongos. We did do a lot of parade and guard drill with the SLR's though. The wood up front was known as the "furniture", and you always loosened that screw a little bit to get a cool slap sound when you presented arms.
"And there's me in me slouch hat,
with me SLR, and greens.
God help me.
I was only 19."
*Redgum - I was only 19*
I live in Townsville, and the line in that song that says 'Townsville lined the footpath as we marched down to the quay' always gives me goosebumps. What a beautifully haunting song.
@@wasthaturbrainmate There's only a couple of songs that will make me tear up just by thinking about it. This is the main one.
I no need up at 19 and was issued the SLR.
I had the pleasure of seeing John Schumann with Redgum play "I was only 19" live at Torrens Parade Ground (Adelaide) one ANZAC Day. It really choked me up!
If you come down to Aus you should contact the Australian War Memorial, they have a huge museum. Not even all the unique stuff is necessarily australian, they could be trophies brought back.
Ive heard their warehouse is extensive and barely any of the collection is on display despite the museum being big enough to spend 2 full days looking at everything.
Worked there for fifteen years. It's true, and as with most large state or national collections, the place displays just a fraction of its collection. Much of the largest and rarest stuff has little to do with the Australian narrative (eg a V2 rocket on its original transport trailer, various other novel or experimental pieces of German technology), so it is not displayed, and likely never will be, at least at the main Memorial site.
@@TheWamjet if understood correctly the V2 is an amalgam of parts from the war and with postwar improvements from British and Australian technicians that were tasked with understanding how it worked. Bloody shame that V2 isn’t on display it’s one of the few left with a good amount of of support gear.
Something like 5% of the collection is on display due to size constraints and even with the new renovations and building new wings it's still not going to be much more.
@@stevenkerr1455
I'm sure I remember seeing a V2 on display at AWM in Canberra as a kid in 1960 or 1961. I did go there for a second visit in 1964.
I had a series of Combat & Survival books when I was young, they were produced in 1987, and I can still remember an article on the Aussie SAS and their custom rifles - sure enough that picture at 5:43 and the cut down FALs were in there, thanks for bringing back the childhood nostalgia. 👍
I remember those things.
Combat and Survival, RAIDS magazine and Commando war stories in pictures, as a country kid from Queensland in the eighties who loved the army they were the best. There was another comic like Commando, but I don’t remember its name.
War Picture Library and Battle Picture Library. Commando Comics is still going!
I have those 2 books , it doesn't have them unfortunately, I just checked. But it does mention that UK soldiers fighting in Falklands war used captured Argentine FALs that had full auto select as a S.A.W on patrol instead of an SLR
The middle finger of the right arm of the free world
I read a book on the NZ and Australian SAS in Vietnam that said they took the flash hiders off and it is mentioned they could inflict and cauterize a wound at 20ft.
The break contact drill you are referring to is called an “ Aussie peel back “. We practiced this drill in the Canadian Army as well
also called the tunnell of love
Ah. The venerable SLR. A thing of true bewdy, mate. Cheers from Tassie.
There were at least 2 which were returned to Australia. One was nicknamed the Bitch, the other was the Beast. Unlike the reproduced version you presented they both had shortened gas systems. In the early nineties one of them was still useable and I fired it during some testing. At that stage the other was worn out and had been turned into a display weapon. Also from memory the front pistol grip was not mounted vertical but was mounted on an angle inwards towards a RH shooter.
I served in the 90's with somebody who'd done this (unofficially) to his SLR in Vietnam. Took a hacksaw to the barrel, got the larger mag and set off on patrol in his usual position as lead scout.
Naturally he was court martialled on return to base and issued a new rifle to which he did the whole thing all over again.
20+ years later he was STILL a private. :D
@@Quadrant14 it's been 30 years... I can barely remember half the proper names in my own section, let alone another platoon.
Not at all dodgy. Just because YOU haven't heard of it doesn't mean it's not true.
I used to be involved in Cowboy Action Shooting, and there were a fair number of Australians in the online community. They were much more casual about the word "b!tch" than the U.S. members. In particular, I remember that there was an Australian woman who was considering "Buckshot B!tch" as her shooting name, and this provoked absolute horror from a lot of U.S. members.
Imagine the reaction to Carronade C#@!
She did take that alias... And yes, its not seen as a rude word here at all really... like Bugger...which some Brits still find objectionable... and yet we have it on TV ads... For a while I was thinking of changing my CAS alias to "Ken Oath"... that would have got through the SASS screening process no worries... LOL
@@trooperdgb9722 well, like most words bugger has meanings based on era and interpretation. As does, well, special, joy, or gay. I don't think the Flintstones were encouraging same sex acts.
Ken Oath is a good one to bypass things still. :)
The rest of the world deems “cuss” or “swearing” the 👹 but in Australia its just a word, we have more important things to deal with🤣
KEN OATH!!!!! @@djagrarms7916
From old diggers who served in Vietnam, they would also cut the barrel right back to the gas block, and this would be carried by a rifleman close to the officer/rear on patrol. This was not used to hit targets, but in full auto, would be shot in short bursts and would sound like a heavy squad weapon (50 cal) giving the enemy the impression they had bumped into a much larger Australian force, and disengaging. One of many tricks used by Aussie diggers to push an advantage
Excellent video. From what I've read, Australian troops preferred to use the L2 magazine over the Bren's "banana" magazine. This was because the L2's magazine spring is stronger, since the Bren feeds downwards and has gravity in its favor. Greetings from Argentine Patagonia. Edited to add a comment: Additionally, the L2 magazine does not need an adapter for retention. Post data: That is not an assault rifle....THIS is an assault rifle.
Banana mags where never used on Australian made L4A4 7.62x51mm Bren guns they only used the straight 20 rd mag for the SLR L1A1 or 30 rd mag for the L2A1. 303 Bren gun mags impossible to fit to a L2A1. They where still in use in some Army Reserve units when I joined the Army in 1989
lol hahahah
Bren Guns in 7.62 NATO (L4 LMG) ran straight mags because 7.62NATO is not a rimmed round. Compare Bren mags with ZB mags. They're the same gun, why the difference?
The story about L4 Bren magazines having weaker springs is a myth, probably to stop soldiers from pilfering them from the Bren gunner to squirrel away in their own kit. Mike from Bloke on the Range discusses it in his latest Finnish Brutality videos.
@@aynjeleyeswrong. The 7.62 bren magazines were used on the Brens in Australian service. I have pictures of RAAF ADGies using the curved 7.62 Bren magazines in their SLRs
My father served in Vietnam at Nui Dat with the 1st Australian Task Force. Unfortunately he never really spoke about it so it’s always interesting for me to hear about the weapons and tactics used by Australian soldiers in Vietnam.
When I went through Australian infantry school in 2014, my section commander who was a commando taught this same break contact drill. Full auto from the hip - also known as dumping a panic mag. Presumably, he was taught this same thing when he was a young dig by Vietnam vets. Doesn't quite have the same impact with an F88 though haha
Yep taught the same thing at Tully jungle warfare centre
The classic G3, Fal and M14 cold war battle rifle trifecta and by extent their sniper rifle modifications are among the sexiest guns ever.
The Right Hand Of The Free World (FAL), The Vietnam-Iraqi Veteran (M14), and The Lance of The Bundeswehr (G3).
Undisputed kings of the Cold War.
In a book a read, they talked about this modification. Turning the weapon full auto apparently involved a match stick. I don't know where or how, as the book didn't really go into detail. Just that it was a common modification
It wasn't exactly selective fire with mod in place.
Yes the match stick held the safety sear down allowing it to fire fully auto. You had to be careful though because it could fire on its own just by cocking it.
I’m an Australian that used theses Weapons “ we called them the SLR - Self-Loading Rifle . L1A1
1969 my Australian Navy uncle came home on leave, carrying openly his issue SLR on the train. Different times.
1945 my Dad came home from Borneo... caught the train to Parramatta to visit his sister who was working in a florists. Went in to a Barber shop nearby and asked the 50-ish year old barber (who not surprisingly was a 1st AIF veteran) to mind his kitbag....and rifle. Different times alright. As CSM of our High School Cadet unit I used to supervise training in the bushland behind the school... we had Lee Enfields of course...and for a while..2 Brens... noone even blinked at a bunch of kids with rifles.....One retired (British) Army Infantry guy who had emigrated out here saw us once while walking his dog.... then came back a number of times to pass on HIS experience! Good times.
The media here in Oz have alot to do with the change in attitudes towards firearms.
@@user-hi5dd5qh9nPort Arthur was the real change. Unsurprisingly the media reported it and people were horrified ... again, unsurprisingly. Likewise with the events at the Lindt cafe and more recently out near Tara.
Nowadays it's not so much the media, but also social media - there are plenty of videos coming out of the USA depicting gun violence.
The fore end on that one seems to be missing the aluminum liner/heat shield inside
My father was in Vietnam as part of the RAEME (technical) group and he had to visit units to look at the techinical problems that came up. He heard of the SAS having problems with SLR barrels splitting open, which is really weird so he went for a visit. On arrival he found that the clowns just took a hacksaw to the barrel with no cleaning up or fixing the end. He organised for the armourer to do the job properly and fix the end of the barrel so it wouldn't split anymore and actually do what they wanted to.
You definitely have to crown the barrel. It’s not a shotgun!
Sounds like crap to me mate. Sounds like your old man is jumping on the band wagon. I would bet my life that did not happen. Ya just full of shit
@@5roundsrapid263 that's pretty much what the problem was, they didn't do it properly resulting in dead barrels.
I’m glad you mentioned the barrels usually being cut down to the gas block. It’s such a badass look, but I also respect this guy not wanting to butcher an authentic barrel like that. Also worth mentioning that the SAS would often leave their “Bitches” in Vietnam to be handed over to the next guys deployed so as to not have too many questions back home.
I served in the infantry as a rifleman/forward scout in the early 90’s. I served in Charlie Company, 31 RAR NQ. I was used to treading around in the rainforest. That’s where we conducted most of our training. We not only survived but thrived in that climate. That’s all we really knew. I was proud to serve because Australian soldiers are respected all over the world. They always give their best, no matter what. I have some older friends that were in Nam. I don’t know how they did it. They were constantly beat down but got up and kept going. That’s the Aussie spirit. Interestingly, my recruit class was the last to be trained with SLR’s. I loved that rifle. I actually topped out my class in marksmanship with it. Lo and behold 6 months later we had to qualify with the steyrs which I hated. I hated the fixed optic. Useless in CQB. And I was a big guy so I preferred a heavier weapon. Unfortunately this also made me the prime candidate for carrying the M60. And that thing was more of a bitch than the SLR was. Also got to play around with a Bren as well which was fun.
"Australian soldiers are respected all over the world".... is that what you keep telling yourselves? unreal
There are several authentic variants that reside in the armoury of RAEME Training Centre at Bandiana. We were able to experience it’s bitchiness on Fitter Armourer course and I’m sure Lithgow small arms factory would have a few squirrelled away as well.
@@user-jw8sp5qy2jyes both.
I did my Fitter Arm't course in the mid-80s and remember RTC very well - and yes, there were some great museum pieces there. Did they still have the volleyball set up in Arm't Wing when you were there? I also remember going up the hill to do optics and the great view from the optically perfect panels! I wonder how much of that infrastructure is left now? Not a lot I'm guessing. Haven't been to the SAFL museum in years.
@@contributor7219 same here brother I'd have to check my records to be accurate but i think 1/87 course. Yes the armoury there has many treasures and that hill is the stuff of nightmares. Can't remember the significance of the volleyball court but our course did take part in the Mad Hatter Regatta on the Murray river with a dodgy raft. Also of note was the end of course range shoot and pub crawl on a stagecoach through Albury. I was at Tech Support SQN 2 CAV and did some great stuff there. We liased with NSW Police ballistics unit to acquire a cache of historical military small arms for display in the SGT's mess which was a highlight. Fun times.
@@BRETTYZCAR And who can forget the Blazing Stump, just past the 'roaches school' across the road! I was 37th class and at The Centre TST and 1AR Tech Sqn at Pucka, about a year ahead of you at RTC I would guess, and spent quite a bit of time at Adelaide Wksp Co and P&E as well. I visited the Tank Museum at Pucka a handful of years back and, after passing the 'bullshit test', had a good chat with the guide about our days there. He also said they were down to a single RAEME adviser and some Reccy Mechs at The Centre TST - down from around 40 in my days. While I was there the air start of their Mack Wrecker fired up, a bit of a haunting sound having just learned how few RAEME staff were left there. You and I certainly enjoyed the halcyon days of RAEME. Stay safe and well!
Infantry Museum at Singleton perhaps?
Great video and i appreciate your bravery for taking such risks Ian, well done.
My dad was still in the army while these were still in use, and saw them gradually be replaced the AUG. Awesome trip down memory lane.
If you look at the 1978 Film The Wild Geese, you will see an SAS Soldier Carrying an SLR that has the Barrel cut down short with No Muzzle Brake or front sight. I seem to recall reading that The Regiment had a small number of these Modified rifles in their armoury. The Soldier in The Film is a Guy called Ian Yule who incidentally had served in The SAS.
The WILD GEESE were mercenaries,not SASR
@@MrOlgrumpy Nobody suggested that they were SAS. My post was about a guy in The Film who is wearing an old style SAS Cap and that's because he Was ex SAS ( Ian Yule) and he is the guy with the Rifle I mentioned. OK.
FAL is the definition of a battle rifle. Awesome.
I can confirm that "Crazy Aussie jumping out of the bush and dumping 30 rounds" is still the standard Australian Army SOP
Small point of interest. In the Australian Vietnam War era infantry what Americans call the point man was called the Scout or lead scout in Australian vernacular. The ten man infantry Section consisted of the 2 man Scout Group in the lead, the 4 man Rifle Group, the 2 man Gun Group (M60), the Gun Group was commanded by a Lance Corporal and the Section was commanded by a Corporal. 3 Sections to a Platoon. 3 Platoons to a Company plus Company HQ and attachments.
A Vietnam War era Australian SAS LRRP patrol was often a 5 man patrol with a patrol Scout, Medic, Gunner, Rifleman and Patrol Commander, often a Sergeant. SAS LRRPs were usually between 2 weeks to a month long. I think the record for one patrol was close to 90 continuous days in the field.
Another excellent video as always... The FAL and L1A1 have been my favorite battle rifles for many years and I have owned several of each..
"I hope you find it enjoyable", you've never put up a video we didn't find enjoyable. You are GUN GOD!! ;-) Thanks for everything you do and keep doing for us mere plebs!
I don't want to re-ignite the debate on the effectiveness of the 5.56 round, but here goes..
An ex SAS soldier who served in Vietnam said to me once when discussing the SLR (FAL) vs the M16, that one big difference was you could hear the 7.62 round smashing it's way through the scrub as it would just keep going and wasn't easily stopped. He added he saw many an enemy soldier get hit repeatedly by 5.56 rounds, and they would often get back up and keep fighting. In caparison he said, when hit with the 7.62, they rarely got back up.
That's the voice of experience.
Misfire drill for the SLR was “tilt right, cock lock, tilt left, look in”.
Basic training sticks with you for life.
I think there may be one on display at the military Museum in Bendigo, Vic. I remember seeing that vertical grip and wondering how in the hell they expected to hold onto that thing in full auto; must've been like holding onto the tail of a pissed-off wildcat.
It's been over a decade since I was there, but walking through a war museum from another country was a fascinating experience. I even had the opportunity to speak to some Aussie vets who were just hanging around; once they realized I was an American, they had to sit me down to tell me a story, and let me tell you, I was captivated the whole time.
They have some examples at the Infantry museum at Singleton..
Most of these used in the SAS seemed to be sawed off L2A1s. In period photos you can see they retained the L2A1 combo bipod and handguard due to the heavy barrel. Seen photo of the 203 mount which looked like a sawed off L1a1. Troops in all common wealth armies seemed to like L2 and 7.62 bren mags when patroling with L1a1 you can see them in photos of Northern Ireland where brits purchased them privately. The only issue i experienced with 30 round L2 and bren mags is the monopod the weapon in prone in some instances. Did a video on these mags in the L1, L2, and FAL.
They didn't keep the biped on the L2 versions. Too heavy, made too much noise
@grimmo74 Yes, they did in most cases because the bipod was also the handguard.
Have a look at photos from Vietnam. The cut down L2s had the grenade launcher mounted or a version of the normal handguard
@grimmo74 not the photos I saw. I own a L2A1 and the barrel diam is larger than the L1a1 and will not take the handguard as well as having a different mounting system.
Interesting, I was in the British army in the 70’s and did some jungle training in Belize with our SAS. They had armalites and pump action shotguns, they told us that the armalites had been Aussie weapons in Vietnam, the shotguns were for the exact same reason, as much fire power as possible in a ambush situation.
exactly
I have a Singapore Police Lithgow L1A1 and it is awesome. It is an outstanding rifle and despite being over 50 years old and beat to crap, it runs flawlessly. It has never failed to work. The L1A1 is an amazing rifle.
Always awesome to see these modifications from the field.
Great video, again Thankyou Ian. To add information, if only for improved understanding/recognition. The Commonwealth Countries variant build of the FN FAL officially became known as the 'Rifle L1A1 SLR'. The most popular common unofficial favoured name that it came to be known as amongst Commonwealth military is SLR, pronounced as...'SLUR'. I used a SLUR during my time in the R.A.N. and privately owned one in the '90s before the Gun Buyback.
I got to fire the New Zealand standard version without the forward hand grip and semi-auto whilst a cadet, amazing accuracy with iron sights, recoil was manageable for a 18 year old shorty!
Ours all had bolt locks to keep them open and the barrels finished about 2 inches from the gas block. They all cameback and were used into the late 80s
I spent many times carrying the SLR L1A1 in the mid '70s to early '80s I liked it, very accurate weapon.
Ian, I highly recommend Gary McKay's "Sleeping With You Ears Open" about the the SASR in Vietnam. Lots of interviews, and some good stuff on weapons.
Yes !!! ... I've been waiting for this.
I saw a photo of this at the Lithgow Small Arms Factory museum. ... thank you Gun Jesus for bringing this forgotten weapon out in open ! 🙏
Thanks mate, I remember hearing about the war on the radio when I was about 5, but had no idea we crafted hybrid weapons, good old Aussie ingenuity.🇦🇺✌️👍
Great video and fantastic stories in the comments. Thank you to everyone of them for posting their experiences of these SLR's
Loved my SLR back in the day, many fond memories of carting it round in the bush
Just looking at the thumbnail and the name, this FAL screamed "full auto" to me.
One of the clearest commentators I have listened to as his volume is excellent, he modulates his voice, great clarity, clear to understand. Fair Dinkum.
In Vietnam we called it the Thunder Stick.. Makes big bang..
It is one of the myths of working in the bush that you need a short barreled rifle. The SLR (please Ian, not FAL) was perfectly fine during my entire tour 68-69 we never felt the need to "shorten barrels." It was all about weight not length and the M16 was available but few chose to use it.
In Denmark the G3 with Danish mods was called the M75. In Australia the FAL with Australian mods was called the SLR. Doesn't change the fact that they're G3s and FALs respectively. It's not until a licensed production is altered to the point of losing parts compatibility with the original that it "becomes it's own thing".
@@andersjjensen From an engineers point of view....yes. From a soldiers point of view.....no.
m16 in my experience was only good cause you could carry more ammo but with the slr if you were hit you stayed hit
@@johnwitte551I heard that from Australians who were in Vietnam too. They referred to the M16 as the "placcy gun" (plastic gun).
@@vk2ig LBPR - Little Black Plastic Rifle
Modern glossary on the term LBPG - I’m guessing either by a civvy or an ex-serviceman wanting to ‘stick it to the man’.
Ian it breaks my heart to say this but I was aware of a modified SLR L1A1 like in the video that was brought back to Australia by a SASR soldier, unfortunately I was told that it was destroyed in the gun buyback program when it became illegal after the port Arthur shooting. ( for clarification I mean of a civilian owned one)
Such a shame.
he should have donated it to a relevant museum.
They buyback was a crime in of itself. And no one had the balls to stand up to it.
@@TheDeadError Well, the Conservative govt in power wanted it, and the Progressives were for it. And people _did_ fight it, legally and with protests; the gun salesmen and some of the more militant owners, but they failed cos really tiny minority and no moral authority. So we got it--and it doesn't stop you owning guns, just limited in scope (no machine guns) and tightened licencing. And how is it a crime? Gun violence--with a tiny and very short uptick--went down a _lot_ and has stayed there. And no mass gun killings in the decades since.
Unlike yours at more than one a week.
@@thekaxmax I live in Australia dude. There are more shootings here than you think and a lot more illegal firearms here, you just don't hear about them. The difference is it's only the government and criminals (there's no difference) have access to any firearms they desire.
Besides, everyone should be able to own a firearm, no matter what may be, for self-defence/hunting/sport. Why? Because adults should be able to make their own decisions and be responsible for their own safety without having to wait for police, because it could already be too late.
And the only reason why there is so much gun violence in the US now and not back in the 50's and 60's was because there wasn't a massive mental health crisis back then. There was also more value put on life too.
TL:DR; quit licking authoritarian boots.
Sitting here at work, the power went out, waiting to get cut loose.
FW video! Perfect.
Video with the power out,now that's something.
The Royal New Zealand Army used the L1A1 for a long time before they were replaced by the Steyr AUG in 1988 which in turn was replaced in 2016 by the 0.223" MARS-L assault-rifle.
I've always liked the look and slight length reduction of those PNG flash suppressors you mentioned. IIRC, Australian testing demonstrated they were basically as effective at suppressing flash as the standard Commonwealth L1A1/SLR/C1 unit, had some moderate muzzle brake function, but may (again. IiRC) have had a slightly negative effect on accuracy.
We had the FAL in my army days 1988/'89 (Belgian army) but I liked the SAFN more. I had the luck to fire both since I was in a logistics unit and they introduced Fal and Vigneron that year.
I also had some fun with the STEN 😊
I used to be in the Australian army in1987-1990, and this was what we used.
We called it the "SLR" or self loadig rifle rather than the FAL.
We used the M60 for the section machine gun as both used the same 7.62mm rounds.
We also used the 5.56mm M16's, but found them to be overcomplicated mechanically, and they were more unreliable on the whole.
The ADF replaced the L1A1 SLR with the Steyr in 1992(I never used one of those)
Brilliant piece of machinery.
I believe there is a B*tch on display at the Lithgow small arms Museum. The front grip was a special order direct from Lithgow according to various SAS biographies. Still just a rear grip of course, modified to suit the front grip task, but they were a specific request from Lithgow.
We never called them FAL's when I was in service, they were called SLR's. We all did the conversions to full auto ourselves but the example shown is the first I've seen with a front grip. We did use the Bren gun mags but they were the straight mags of the L4. Most of the time we carried a mixture of SLR or Bren gun mags whenever we were out in the scrub.
I don't care what anyone says, the L1A1 SLR is the best rifle we ever had in service.
Mark Graham of ARS built my FAL on a DSA receiver w/ Imbel parts kit. It was dead on accurate out of the box. Great job, and one of my favorite rifles.
Love the FAL--awesome rifle. Thanks for the discussion and showing that one to us!
This looks like a gun made with videogame tactics lol. Never thought I'd see such a large mag for a 308
Bren gun
@@Surv1ve_Thrive- no, it’s a 30 round magazine from a L2, not a L4A4. Easy way to tell is the AR magazine is straight, the L4A4 (Bren) has a slight curve.
I’ve seen pictures of an Aussie Stirling in Vietnam with a gigantic silencer and an under barrel grenade launcher dangling off it.
Me to it's so great lmao altho my love is always for the owen
Only SMGs I've seen Vietnam era diggers carry was the Owen gun, or the F1. It may have happened, can't say never but Australia never produced the Stirling. The F1 looks like an Owen gun with an in line stock and a Lanchester barrel shroud.
@@robertmansfield7656 I'd say he has mistaken the F1 for a sterling...
You are quite possibly correct in identifying the gun despite what those other 2 said. Australia did infact use the suppressed version officially
@@R0d_1984wrong. It was the suppressed Stirling. I've seen the same pic. Totally illogical
Hell tes! I've been waiting for a video on these to be on the channel since I started watching the channel 11 years ago (probably every Aussie viewer has been), my understanding is many were quietly converted back to the standard pattern toward the end of Australian involvement in the Vietnam war.
Thank you for this show. My father was SAS AUS WHEN THE TOURS WERE UP. OBVIOUSLY BRASS WANTED THESE WEPONS BACK ! So Aussie fitter and turner’s could have them hidden by its previous occupant and inventor of his B.I.T.C.H. gotta love us Aussies. Especially in jungle warfare i reckon we hold our own there. Bless democracy bless freedom and BE PREPARED SADLY BUT IMPORTANTLY TO FACE THIS MADNESS AGAIN. BUT IN WAYS NEVER BEFORE SEEN. THIS IS GOOD VS EVIL. 🇦🇺🇦🇺❤️❤️
There was also an experimental Australian Army bullpup version of the L1A1. It was pretty much an unofficial experiment and only a couple of units were made.
The Infantry Museum has a VC made version of the SLR!!
Cool, I was at the trailing edge of the FN with the Canadian military going from FN to C7 ( basically M-16A2) so it was interesting to know more about it.
Now this is a real treat and thank you!
Hi Ian I’m a big fan of yours thank you for your great presentation and knowledge we would love to see you in Australia