one thing for dc is that they are really creative with their color grading style, like the combination of green,blue, and yellow red with their unique camera cinematography proportion you can tell thats a dc film
@@35pen61 Lol, I was speaking about DC. I mean, you saw the last Flash movie right? How about the WB crap? CGI upper lip? How could you think I was talking about any other company?
@@kiillabytez Not every scene, but you got the right part of Bad cgi in marvel movies nowadays since the end of endgame. I mean Flash was very bad but as a VFX artist myself Marvel does horrendously with that kind of budget and deadlines they weren't even using ILM no more
I say marvel and dc should just keep doing their own things. Both shouldn’t try to be each other. Take the flash movie for example, it tried to do marvel’s “cg things” and end up with weird visuals.
The Flash had weird visuals because of hundreads of reshoots and it ended up not using the original already finished product, the final , the ending everything was supposed to different
As a Marvel Fan i admittedly judge their movies as having no colors, bland colors and the costumes looking like they were all made by the same person and the predictability of shots, not to mention how they all incorporate tech into their skillsets that it kinda made the characters not have distinction to one another. I noticed later films tried to change that but time will tell if the cinematography would improve. Although this may not be related but Marvel's ability to make such memorable , relatable, and compelling stories are what made the franchise such a success and when you watch something that hooks you to the characters and their stories, you kinda don't care how it looks in camera, what matters is still the story.
honestly im a big marvel fan but the movies never really hit me as hard as DC's movies and thats wether I liked it or not it just actually felt like something. Only spidermans movies really got to me.
Eight of the 15 DCEU films failed to make a profit. That's more than a 50% rate of failure. Marvel has 33 films. The Marvels is it's only flop. That's a 3.03% failure rate. That's a huge difference, which is why the MCU made a vastly larger profit per film than the DC movies did.
@@BodDiv just because a movie fails to make profit doesnt really mean anything to me.. alot of great films have failed to make profits. Im just speaking for myself on why i like dc films over marvel, how much $ the films make wasnt a factor or care for me
u said it, marvel film cameras are flat, there is no depth. every cut, every camera Angel is predictable. the cgi is so clean that you can see the edges that separates the characters and green screen. but in batman 2022 for example the camera is dirty, u can sense objects because of Lens focus. instead of green screen,they used monitors as background static of gotham. the cgi they used for the last 10 minutes is realistic and they've choosed a perfect color palette for movie. In conclusion, dc movies tend to have a cinematic approach rather than being an amusement park.
So the movies are better because the camera is dirty? Your statement sounds little stupid. How's it flat? They literally have good aesthetics shots throughout different movies. Black panther, guardian of the Galaxy, just to bend free examples. Although i would say these past 3 to 4 years where i would agree with your statement. But before that they were on to if their game. And if marvel movies are predictable so are DC. What makes it so difference just because it's a lot mysterious? If i was a dc fan watching the Batman i would've guessed what happened but it didn't take the enjoyment out of the movie. What I'm saying is saying the movie is predictable is a invalid reason and meaningless. Along with being that you can see the "edges" because the cgi so clean? Like what? You not making any sense...
@@kishoratono1567 well i needed to clarify my statement, and yes the lens needs to be dirty. i will give you a DC sample, nolan's dark knight trilogy has no tune in colour Palette there is too much white color scheme during the fight scene between bane and batman. the camera is simple, something beyone flat no creativity in camera angles. just two dudes throwing punches at each other
@@kishoratono1567 FYI a lot of the movies camera men actively try to get the right amount of dirt on their camera lens. Go do your research on why they do.
Not all DC movies follow a dark tone. For example, while Batman follows a dark tone, Man of Steel follows a bluish tone, Suicide Squad follows a colorful dark tone, and Zack Snyder's Justice League follows a dark-brown tone, they are not all the same.
@@hasanrafi4837 i wouldn't say color grading is what soley decides a movie tone,tone is a the authors feeling as well,,,so while peacemaker and suicide squad color grading is Bright there tone is still dark- comedy,which is still dark
DC is very cinematic with their piss filter in all of the movies (I am being ironic ofc). Please for the love of all that is Holly stop with that yellow filter. We get it is dark it doesn't need to use this filter find another...
Civil war is darker than most other with the same cast, what makes stuff darker isn't just the colour palette or the amount of death, but rather the focus on the darker aspects of human psychology...while most dc movies are on the same level of dark as Marvel ones, DC ones are generally more mature while Marvel is kinda more kid friendly (doesn't mean adults can't enjoy it), and tbh, most X men films would beat both Marvel and DC at being mature...but hey, that's just a theory, a film theory
They look so different, because DC was originally about mystery with crazyness mixed in, Marvel is less about mystery and is more about simply superheroes. The reason as to why batman and superman are so much more popular than the other superheroes in DC, is because their villains are all about making it hard for them to see their plots coming, whereas Marvel villains, and most DC villains for other heroes for that matter are laughably on-the-nose with their evil plans, and we the audience/readers see their evil plans coming miles away. I mean think about it: "DR DOOM", and in ALL the comics, films, and TV shows, the villains' evil plan is no challenge at all for the heroes to figure out. DC stands for detective comics, which naturally gives them tones of curiosity, of "what's going to happen next?" . Marvel sounds like a fireworks display, which naturally makes it have a tone of awe as opposed to curiosity, because we the audience already know what's going to happen: big evil plan, big epic fight, big epic win, and there is no mystery as to who is up to what, why when, how and where. The thing about mystery is, it is naturally a dark thing, whereas laughably overt heroism/villainy is more comedic.
DC always been the most creative and a hardcore risk taker, DCEU was a failure but their Elseworld films are way better and impactful than what someof the DCEu and MCU put together, even though there are masterpieces like iron man 1, ZSJL,Man of steel, captain America winter soldier etc
0:07 CORRECTION: a 'Theme Park film' would be Pirates of the Caribbean & the Haunted Mansion, both, LITERALLY based on rides at Disney World and Disneyland! Tisk Tisk, Mr. Scorsese.
Most DC movies feel like they're in a post apocalyptic earth where even during the day it seems dark but they say its waaay easier to edit dark footage than any other way of filming
Let's see how the New DC will deal with this ,,can they win audience plus creators trust with their lots of projects to come in future ?? Time will tell
Being darker doesn't mean its cinematic lol. it'll make a stereotype among new creators (for those who didn't understand sht I meant we can still obtain cinematic shots with light placements and stuff)
I didn't noticed it until now but DC films do feel alot more like the vision of their creators from way back with Superman 1978 to the Dark Knight trilogy even now with the Wonder Woman movies, Zack Snyder's trilogy, The Batman, Joker, The Suicide Squad and the many more films that came before and are to to come with James Gunn's new upcoming DCU with a heavy focus on creator's vision don't get me wrong I am not in any shape or form talking about critical or commercial success especially when in comparison to Marvel I am talking about the feel and tone which always varies and feels distinct from project to project and clearlt reflects the Director's take on these characters and this world and with exceptions like all the MCU Phase 1 movies or James Gunn's the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy or some offshots like Multiverse of Madness with Sam Raimi I don't see a creator's vision coming out of these movies they all just.... blend in like watching all 3 MCU Spider Man movies gave me absolutely no idea on Jon Watts's vision as a director unlike say Jon Favreau with his Iron Man
This is why Marvel Animations is about to destroy the MCU. Not entirely... but when it comes to content? Marvel Animations is about to make the MCU look like a complete and utter peasant. Why? Becuase that brand has the keys to have creative freedom! Look at how amazing X-Men '97 looks with its art style and visual aesthetic. Something the MCU barely tries to achieve for their films. No cinematic creativity. Even though Marvel Animations will serve the MCU in some form or way! They have the keys to do whatever they want and create whatever they want with full creative vision while not having the MCU breathe down their neck. Not being restricted. The mcu is obviously restricted.
this is just criticizing the airport scene in civil war. the russo's said the color scheme for that scene was chosen to demonstrate the characters moving more into moral grey as they fought each other.
It's so Sad How the DCEU is getting better in the Art of Cinema, they have ditch the DCAU. I really Hope a New DCAU (not the Tomorrowverse) and do more Justice on it!
These are some of the reasons why Dc movies are called Dark, 1.Dc movies aims for a more realistic approach,Dc explore more grounding and matured themes,like morality,and the consequences of power 2.source material,Dc movies has reach history in Dark and complex style and design,These influenced the tone for Dc live action movies 3.Character origins,Dc character from Batman wonder woman and superman,always has a traumatic origin story,which leads to intense and darker narrative Realistic Approach,Dc aims on using realism,more often than CGI, Characters in marvel areboften Green screened,
To each, their own. I don't think Marvel films are awe striking, as they do genuinely have very flat color schemes. But I think that's a purposeful choice - with DC films it feels like a story, a fantasy, but with Marvel it feels like real life, and to me that's just as immersive.
There are some really good points this video makes, even though I am admittedly more a Marvel fan than a DC fan. BUT I need to argue a little about the CGI point they tried to make. DC is grittier but my favorite movies and two of the most filled with CGI DC movies are Wonder Woman and Aqua Man. My best friend loves Shazam but that is so much CGI too. I’d say they are equal, Marvel and DC.
@@BrimsHL it was not a HUGE hit. It didn't lose money. But people weren't talking about it like Xmen. Buzz wasn't crazy. The Matrix came about a year later and got huge numbers for an r rated movie. Blade only kinda got past blockbuster status.
@@4D1Characterror it was still a hit and a hit for an R rated movie. The only reason Spider-Man and X-Men made more was because they were PG-13. Everybody and their mother was talking about it. Including white people. Obviously you have no idea what was going on at the time.
@@BrimsHL it was the first r rated movie I saw in theaters. I loved the movie. I know there was no one talking about it because other than my brother who saw it with me, there was no one talking about it around me, and no big buzz about it on TV. Compared to other movies of the 90s- True Lies Die Hard 3, Schindler's List, The Rock, it didn't get much attention or as much money.
honestly, that's why I liked marvel projects like Loki, both doctor strange films, Avengers AoU, Wandavision, and the netflix shows. They have a visual style that's different from the standard cookie cutter MCU projects. Even the Iron Man films had a lot of dirty and raw shots that made it feel real while still keeping the superhero tone up. The first Thor films had a lot of dutch angles which I honestly liked but many didn't. AoU, a film criticized by many for absolutely no reason at all, has a lot of beautiful shots that reflect the tone of the scene or conversations. The dinner party, the scenes with ultron, the banters between banner and tony, all of it have colour gradings that reflect the tone. The Iron Man vs Hulk fight also had a lot of cool shots that made it iconic. The winter soldier too, had a lot of raw shots that made it feel a lot more grounded than say Civil War. I think, ultimately, the reason why Marvel doesn't incorporate cool cinematography is due to the audience. Some appreciate darker tones, some prefer light, some prefer wider shots, some prefer more blurred shots. Instead of trying to please everyone with these, they please no one and try to keep it simple to focus more on the quality of the shot rather than the way its shot. You'll really see a more creative direction from Phase 1 and Phase 4, the so called black sheep of the Marvel films.
Yeah I agree, I know Eternals was critically panned, but man that movie had some beautiful shots. Phase 4 tried, but story and anchors for driving story just wasn't there. I agree with Loki and Wandavision, the creativity was thriving during the pandemic.
It's fascinating how much solely on visuals we perceive things differently. MCU have dark and thoughtful storyline like Winter Soilder and Civil War. In WS the scene where Zola describes people ironically giving away there privacy to protect that very thing , gave me chills. Honestly, it's haunting to imagine being surrounded by nothing other than machine and it tells you how it's manipulating humans into submission that even by their own will. But I think most tend to forgot this critical scene bcs it is shot in generic style. If that same Zola scene was shot in The Batman style, with intricate camera dynamic and immersive perspective & sound then it would hv impacted lot strongly. Creating a lasting impression. By the way, Deadpool and Wolverine looks pretty good. The director did insist on shooting in real life location which is paying off. So I guess , Feige might from now on let director hv more say. I hope if MK movie gets made they bring Matt Reeve or a director with tasteful cinematography bcs the contrast of white suit with dark background and a gaint Moon glowing behind MK will be iconic. But it can only be done with accomplished cinematographer.
I love both Marvel and DC Films. But I remember much more memorable shots from DC Movie than Marvel, take Batman 2022 for example, during the penguin chase scene and when batman crashes penguin, look at the scene where batman drifts to show the impact of penguins vehicle. Beautiful shot
If DC ever go through yt comments i hope they know we love their art style just the way it is,to this day the 2022 Batman movie is my favorite movie; sound design,unique shots,LUTs etc its the pinnacle of what i know DC represents - dark coolness
Okay how come this doesn't have tons of more views? I've personally got no hate towards Marvel but since Endgame it's been kinda drifting further away from me, especially since I too notice and don't like almost every movie having no darker lighting effects and such and the characters not getting the depth they really need, DC's cinemagraphy have been decent for me and doesn't disappoint visually at least and The Batman made it all feel so much more promising again I'm hoping they do bring out such masterpieces to watch and enjoy
it feels like marvel are made for kids (like those people cheering at a screen) and dc for adults, marvel is so colorful , predictable, no think just enjoy (and full of jokes), while dc is ..cinema, serious movies for your senses to enjoy in silence.
Marvel did find out how to make consistently success movies, BUT then they lost their touch completely! Most of their movies since Endgame have been flops.
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel since i own there 2010s-2000s blu-rays and posters of marvel and encyclopedia book so i dont care about your childish speech kid! marvel is king with my dc
I prefer the vivid and bold approach of many of the Marvel movies like Guardians of the Galaxy and Iron Man. The studio still uses night scenes, moody shadows and colorized effects at times. While cinematic might have a lot more post edit creative style, plus lighting effects while filming, I am not a fan of the overly dark look of the latest Batman when it gets too gritty and very little light on set. Perhaps somewhere in the middle of both extremes is best. Pick the scenes for the best lighting setup for the story. Half cinematic perhaps? Games of Thrones went there on cinematic lighting at times and that was good. Except the final White Walkers battle was far too dark tones as many fan critics say.
DC has always been way more aesthetically pleasing to me and the characters have a lot more style and flair (i also love the fact that their villains are more complex in both personality and style) and overall has way more contrasts between the dark and bright (sometimes neon) colors while the marvel is kinda always just kinda bland and lacking to me but that being said i still love them both (maybe DC just a tad more...)
Superman's my favorite DC character. Do I like Man of Steel? Yes. Do I think Superman needs to be all dark and depressed? No. He's a guy wearing red and blue spandex with undies over his pants and a freakin cape. How can you take yourself THAT seriously while wearing that? Notice that Marvel characters with really elaborate and colorful costumes tend to take themselves less seriously. Like Iron Man and Spider-Man. And then there's Captain America. Yeah he's wearing the American flag, but he's more serious than his counterparts because he's a soldier. He's not a rich boy in an armor or a high school kid in spandex. He's a soldier, and those are his uniform. It's a symbol from a time where the US was a beacon of hope, and the people in the Marvel universe look to Captain America for hope because that's what he represents by wearing red, white and blue. So just because a movie looks darker doesn't mean it's better.
Great video. You highlighted points that I as a movie watcher don't typically think about in regard to various filmmaking styles. It's kinda like how the first 4 Harry Potter films have bright coloring and r more adventurous and light-hearted, but the 5th and 6th have very dark lighting with more tension. Marvel films have been nominated for/have won Oscars, so they are also capable of being serious and reach Scorcese's standard like some DC films have.
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my poster and enyclopedia marvel and dc books so no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so cry more
X men definitely isn’t for kids But aside from that, DC is darker, grittier, and meant for more mature audiences Marvel is more fun, colorful, and lighthearted
I Get Martin Scorsese I'd Rather Direct Something like Swamp Thing (2019) not a movie I know than something like Shang Chi I'm used to Films like Rocky Terminator even RoboCop also some of my favorite films are based on DC Comics Imprints so there's that
I wouldn’t agree. Both can be either unrealistic or realistic. Daredevil is more “realistic”, Avengers is more unrealistic. The Batman is more realistic, SnyderCut is more unrealistic
Right so a guy flying at the speed of sound is realistic cool ( not dissing DC I love superman) I do prefer marvel but most stuff after endgame hasn’t been good
Ya flying without any forces and a lasse that lights up and makes you tell the truth pretty realistic 💀 bruh superhero movies supposed to be unrealistic lol
DC always make movements in slow motion. A hero walks, slow motion. A hero jumps, slow motion. A hero attacks, slow motion. Group of heroes poses in front of the camera? Slow motion. annoying slow motion.
DC falls flat when it assumes it is Marvel's competition. That's when they release trash like BvS and Justice League. After making WATCHMEN, that shoulve been the point they realized how special they really are. I don't understand why they lowered themselves after Man of Steel to do those "power ranger amusement park" films. Thank God, Matt Reeves has revived that DC flamboyance. THE BATMAN has brought back that feeling i got from WATCHMEN.
Came here for the question of why Marvel and DC films look different. I didn't know this was a commercial for software. There go 11:40 down the drain. 😂😅
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my poster no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so who cares for u!
@@jeanp.5929Thank you. The Flash is not a dark and moody film as portrayed here and neither is Wonderwoman. When the presenter says DC movies are darker/whatever do they really mean Batman as thinking about it Superman films weren't that dark and moody either.
to the people saying marvel is shallow, this whole video is nothing but a shallow explaination for people who have no clue or havent seen any super hero movies
Marvel doesn't need dark and violent to be entertaining. They have a rich lineup of characters with actual substance and depth. Sure, DC might have its little edge and gore, but that just makes it feel like it's trying too hard. Marvel is all about fun, action, and adventure. It's like a comic book come to life. And let's be honest, who doesn't love a good superhero story? So keep your dark and violent DC stuff. I'll stick with Marvel and its colorful, entertaining roster of heroes.
Marvel did an amazing job harmonizing the infinity saga films, especially with the odds against it. It was not meant to be "Tree of life" cinema... it's an ode to our childhood. Dc arguably accomplished some of that in isolated instances ( 2-3 characters. Christopher Nolan's work probably the apex.) But overall failed to harmonize stories and character arc's consistently AND visually. Recently Marvel has gotten too lazy with green screen , and DC has gotten more inconsistent. It's deeper than simply visuals, though that is a big part of it.
DC are money makers, Marvel too...the best for DC are Superman I and II, Batman 1989 and Batman Returns, TDK trilogy, Snyder's JL trilogy, Joker, The Suicide Squad, The Batman...W's all around...Gunn's DCU coming too
Simple = for the masses It's hard to digest a lot of heavy, concentrated products. Especially hard to do it in quantity. Marvel got the formula right, you can watch it at any mood and switch off 95% of your brain. The always more "complex" formula tend to lose even if it's "better" it' became a niche, think League > Dota Street Fighter > Tekken Fortnite/Valo > CS Then again, DC is just too messy without a proper DCEU except that short period Kids growing up all knew Superman, Batman but MCU totally made characters like Cap/Thor/Iron-Man a household name.
You miss the point. DC movies are called dark not because of the colour pallet, but because of the tone. marvel may be blowing up entire civilisation, but they also crack stupid jokes every 10 minutes, so it's hard to take them seriously.
Id say Marvel definitely aims more for the “futuristic sci fi” theme in its art direction while DC tries to be more gritty and dark. Marvel’s visuals are cleaner and more refined to communicate the idea of a society superior to our own, while DC’s visuals are typically dirtier and more muted to convey that this world is less of a technological utopia and more of a grimy, almost dystopian society where life might actually be worse than it is irl. Its less about cool flashy effects and more about raw realistic action
I feel conflicted about this. Because, I don't Marvel movies for treating theirs movies the same type movies. But, I don't like DC comics movies for focusing mostly on Batman instead of others characters they have.
what these directors doesn't get is that you have to see superheroes movies through the actual people who grew up reading the comics and watching it's animated series lense. Not their own exagerated film perception. Marvel works cos it delivers what actual superheroes fans like and want to see. Not a highly dramatic cut all dark and shady, but a colorful display full of action and excitement. As long as DC keep missing it, will keep on failing behind Marvel
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my posters and encyloepdia books so no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so who cares for u!
Not the dc people totally dissing marvel 😂 I love dc’s style of filming and respect the grind 😊 for me, I’d rather watch a marvel movie just because I like some of the character’s stories better & bc I actually do like the grand, almost fake looking entrances of the characters. But I really love the idea of actually making a camera lenses dirty for a shot. I also noticed marvel’s “bland” visual style did make it feel more relatable, and I liked that part of mcu movies. Although, many of the fight scenes were very immersive and not at all bland. Overall, I like both styles of filming and I think both franchises are very successful. (Just the dissing was a little unprofessional, unless there is a reason im missing, which I probably am… I’m only going off of this video)
Maturity is when you realise that "Marvelization" of modern films is why cinema is actually dying. the over-stuffed cringe humor in serious scenes, woke agendas, corny dialogues, predictable plotholes and this has been consistent not only in MCU since Endgame but also in other mainstream commercial movies. After sometime all this CGI fest becomes a visual diarrhoea because its all generic. one of the main reasons why the DCEU which started with a serious approach, fell off after trying to copy MCU in Josstice League. As a comic book fan of both Marvel and DC , i just hate watching these new MCU/DC movies, however The Batman n Joker are still promising.
DC fails cos they rarely give any other heroes a chance and when they fail when they try one like Green Lantern, they go back to Batman. Marvel succeeds from comic book failure by giving different studios the right to make films. Hence, Fox Sony and Paramount were able to introduce different characters. 70+ characters have been introduced to live action. Whilst DC only has 15+ Also, every time they introduce batman they fail to give us his sidekicks. Why does Joker have his own film, its completely unnecessary
Constantine and the Burton/nolan batmans were pretty much the only good dc movies. Marvel movies are just more accurate, better dialoge, perfect casting.
one thing for dc is that they are really creative with their color grading style, like the combination of green,blue, and yellow red with their unique camera cinematography proportion you can tell thats a dc film
Not to mention the really bad CGI in every scene.
@@kiillabytez true marvel always been lazy since the beginning
@@35pen61 Lol, I was speaking about DC. I mean, you saw the last Flash movie right? How about the WB crap? CGI upper lip? How could you think I was talking about any other company?
@@kiillabytez Not every scene, but you got the right part of Bad cgi in marvel movies nowadays since the end of endgame. I mean Flash was very bad but as a VFX artist myself Marvel does horrendously with that kind of budget and deadlines they weren't even using ILM no more
@@35pen61 Instead of releasing 1 project every 3 years, they'll release 10 projects every 3 instead.
That being said, DC should have zero excuses.
I say marvel and dc should just keep doing their own things. Both shouldn’t try to be each other. Take the flash movie for example, it tried to do marvel’s “cg things” and end up with weird visuals.
The Flash had weird visuals because of hundreads of reshoots and it ended up not using the original already finished product, the final , the ending everything was supposed to different
That flash movie was basically a marvel movie in every aspect
@@Prosthetics555it would be the worst of the bunch
The new boss of warner literally blocked the batgirl movie release 💀💀
@@Prosthetics555 nope it was horrendous
As a Marvel Fan i admittedly judge their movies as having no colors, bland colors and the costumes looking like they were all made by the same person and the predictability of shots, not to mention how they all incorporate tech into their skillsets that it kinda made the characters not have distinction to one another. I noticed later films tried to change that but time will tell if the cinematography would improve. Although this may not be related but Marvel's ability to make such memorable , relatable, and compelling stories are what made the franchise such a success and when you watch something that hooks you to the characters and their stories, you kinda don't care how it looks in camera, what matters is still the story.
Dc films just always hit harder for me. Felt more like directors with visions even if they sometimes failed.
honestly im a big marvel fan but the movies never really hit me as hard as DC's movies and thats wether I liked it or not it just actually felt like something. Only spidermans movies really got to me.
Exactly....DC directors are visionaries even tho they sometimes fail.....well said...
Yeah you might be right
Eight of the 15 DCEU films failed to make a profit. That's more than a 50% rate of failure. Marvel has 33 films. The Marvels is it's only flop. That's a 3.03% failure rate. That's a huge difference, which is why the MCU made a vastly larger profit per film than the DC movies did.
@@BodDiv just because a movie fails to make profit doesnt really mean anything to me.. alot of great films have failed to make profits. Im just speaking for myself on why i like dc films over marvel, how much $ the films make wasnt a factor or care for me
u said it, marvel film cameras are flat, there is no depth. every cut, every camera Angel is predictable. the cgi is so clean that you can see the edges that separates the characters and green screen.
but in batman 2022 for example the camera is dirty, u can sense objects because of Lens focus. instead of green screen,they used monitors as background static of gotham. the cgi they used for the last 10 minutes is realistic and they've choosed a perfect color palette for movie.
In conclusion, dc movies tend to have a cinematic approach rather than being an amusement park.
So the movies are better because the camera is dirty? Your statement sounds little stupid. How's it flat? They literally have good aesthetics shots throughout different movies. Black panther, guardian of the Galaxy, just to bend free examples.
Although i would say these past 3 to 4 years where i would agree with your statement. But before that they were on to if their game.
And if marvel movies are predictable so are DC. What makes it so difference just because it's a lot mysterious? If i was a dc fan watching the Batman i would've guessed what happened but it didn't take the enjoyment out of the movie.
What I'm saying is saying the movie is predictable is a invalid reason and meaningless. Along with being that you can see the "edges" because the cgi so clean? Like what? You not making any sense...
@@kishoratono1567 even my response to this will be meaningless and stupid, there's no point in this argument
@@GabrielFernandez-es5nc then there's no point for that comment too then....
@@kishoratono1567 well i needed to clarify my statement, and yes the lens needs to be dirty. i will give you a DC sample, nolan's dark knight trilogy has no tune in colour Palette there is too much white color scheme during the fight scene between bane and batman.
the camera is simple, something beyone flat no creativity in camera angles. just two dudes throwing punches at each other
@@kishoratono1567 FYI a lot of the movies camera men actively try to get the right amount of dirt on their camera lens. Go do your research on why they do.
The thing about DC is that not all of their characters r supposed to be dark and gloomy like Batman.
So so true... I want the next Superman (2025) film to be bright and have a different tone that separates him from Batman
But comic book superman isnt necessarily bright and pretty either
Dc heroes have always been a little edgy@@justanormalguy4816
Not all DC movies follow a dark tone. For example, while Batman follows a dark tone, Man of Steel follows a bluish tone, Suicide Squad follows a colorful dark tone, and Zack Snyder's Justice League follows a dark-brown tone, they are not all the same.
@@hasanrafi4837 i wouldn't say color grading is what soley decides a movie tone,tone is a the authors feeling as well,,,so while peacemaker and suicide squad color grading is Bright there tone is still dark- comedy,which is still dark
@@rtd4413 Peacemaker and suicide squad didn't have a dark tone. lol
DC always aimed for the cinematic shots and cinematic luts
What do you mean cinematic shots? 😀😀😀 marvels shots are also cinematic shots
Fr man people are just throwing words around @Niibaah
DC is very cinematic with their piss filter in all of the movies (I am being ironic ofc). Please for the love of all that is Holly stop with that yellow filter. We get it is dark it doesn't need to use this filter find another...
Came for the thumbnail, stayed for the video 🫡
Came to the thumbnail stayed for the video
😂
So true
@@thebeardofpepe 📸📸📸
its photoshopped bud
Civil war is darker than most other with the same cast, what makes stuff darker isn't just the colour palette or the amount of death, but rather the focus on the darker aspects of human psychology...while most dc movies are on the same level of dark as Marvel ones, DC ones are generally more mature while Marvel is kinda more kid friendly (doesn't mean adults can't enjoy it), and tbh, most X men films would beat both Marvel and DC at being mature...but hey, that's just a theory, a film theory
They look so different, because DC was originally about mystery with crazyness mixed in, Marvel is less about mystery and is more about simply superheroes. The reason as to why batman and superman are so much more popular than the other superheroes in DC, is because their villains are all about making it hard for them to see their plots coming, whereas Marvel villains, and most DC villains for other heroes for that matter are laughably on-the-nose with their evil plans, and we the audience/readers see their evil plans coming miles away. I mean think about it: "DR DOOM", and in ALL the comics, films, and TV shows, the villains' evil plan is no challenge at all for the heroes to figure out.
DC stands for detective comics, which naturally gives them tones of curiosity, of "what's going to happen next?" . Marvel sounds like a fireworks display, which naturally makes it have a tone of awe as opposed to curiosity, because we the audience already know what's going to happen: big evil plan, big epic fight, big epic win, and there is no mystery as to who is up to what, why when, how and where.
The thing about mystery is, it is naturally a dark thing, whereas laughably overt heroism/villainy is more comedic.
DC always been the most creative and a hardcore risk taker, DCEU was a failure but their Elseworld films are way better and impactful than what someof the DCEu and MCU put together, even though there are masterpieces like iron man 1, ZSJL,Man of steel, captain America winter soldier etc
0:07 CORRECTION: a 'Theme Park film' would be Pirates of the Caribbean & the Haunted Mansion, both, LITERALLY based on rides at Disney World and Disneyland! Tisk Tisk, Mr. Scorsese.
Yeah because there aren't any theme parks based on marvel. Ahem ahem Universal studios
Universal?😊
Most DC movies feel like they're in a post apocalyptic earth where even during the day it seems dark but they say its waaay easier to edit dark footage than any other way of filming
But then again I live under a rock (metaphorically speaking) so what do I know
Let's see how the New DC will deal with this ,,can they win audience plus creators trust with their lots of projects to come in future ?? Time will tell
I heard that James Gunn is honning in on creative vision. So hopefully, the films will try to be cinema to a great extent.
Being darker doesn't mean its cinematic lol. it'll make a stereotype among new creators (for those who didn't understand sht I meant we can still obtain cinematic shots with light placements and stuff)
IT WAS NOT ABOUT BEING DARK
Stupid folk
Hi mcu fanboy
@@left4deadR wtf I'm not a fan boy lol I just hates comic book movies 😂
@@left4deadR oh btw hi fictional character fanboy what's your role model batman? joker? Oh or Spiderman?
I love both but DC hits me so hard. They make arts.
I didn't noticed it until now but DC films do feel alot more like the vision of their creators
from way back with Superman 1978 to the Dark Knight trilogy
even now with the Wonder Woman movies, Zack Snyder's trilogy, The Batman, Joker, The Suicide Squad and the many more films that came before and are to to come with James Gunn's new upcoming DCU with a heavy focus on creator's vision
don't get me wrong I am not in any shape or form talking about critical or commercial success especially when in comparison to Marvel I am talking about the feel and tone which always varies and feels distinct from project to project and clearlt reflects the Director's take on these characters and this world
and with exceptions like all the MCU Phase 1 movies or James Gunn's the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy or some offshots like Multiverse of Madness with Sam Raimi
I don't see a creator's vision coming out of these movies they all just.... blend in
like watching all 3 MCU Spider Man movies gave me absolutely no idea on Jon Watts's vision as a director unlike say Jon Favreau with his Iron Man
This is why Marvel Animations is about to destroy the MCU.
Not entirely... but when it comes to content? Marvel Animations is about to make the MCU look like a complete and utter peasant.
Why?
Becuase that brand has the keys to have creative freedom! Look at how amazing X-Men '97 looks with its art style and visual aesthetic.
Something the MCU barely tries to achieve for their films.
No cinematic creativity.
Even though Marvel Animations will serve the MCU in some form or way! They have the keys to do whatever they want and create whatever they want with full creative vision while not having the MCU breathe down their neck.
Not being restricted.
The mcu is obviously restricted.
@@youngspecial64 if it gives me great marvel cartoons and marvel cartoons sequels... sure
@@youngspecial64 DC animation is on another level.
@@youngspecial64 So you're mad that the Movies aren't given to narcissistic control freaks who are fine running roughshod over IPs they don't own?
this is just criticizing the airport scene in civil war. the russo's said the color scheme for that scene was chosen to demonstrate the characters moving more into moral grey as they fought each other.
it still looks bland.
Hi mcu fanboy
@@left4deadR oh my dear little boy just chill dude 😂 no one's hurting you
It's so Sad How the DCEU is getting better in the Art of Cinema, they have ditch the DCAU. I really Hope a New DCAU (not the Tomorrowverse) and do more Justice on it!
Superman will start it, i believe.
The first major marvel hit was Blade, and it was dark
The batman amazing film
These are some of the reasons why Dc movies are called Dark,
1.Dc movies aims for a more realistic approach,Dc explore more grounding and matured themes,like morality,and the consequences of power
2.source material,Dc movies has reach history in Dark and complex style and design,These influenced the tone for Dc live action movies
3.Character origins,Dc character from Batman wonder woman and superman,always has a traumatic origin story,which leads to intense and darker narrative
Realistic Approach,Dc aims on using realism,more often than CGI, Characters in marvel areboften Green screened,
To each, their own. I don't think Marvel films are awe striking, as they do genuinely have very flat color schemes. But I think that's a purposeful choice - with DC films it feels like a story, a fantasy, but with Marvel it feels like real life, and to me that's just as immersive.
X-MEN was shown as a trailer at the first showing of BLADE. Blade was first.
wild thumbnail ngl 💀
fr 💀
how?
There are some really good points this video makes, even though I am admittedly more a Marvel fan than a DC fan. BUT I need to argue a little about the CGI point they tried to make. DC is grittier but my favorite movies and two of the most filled with CGI DC movies are Wonder Woman and Aqua Man. My best friend loves Shazam but that is so much CGI too. I’d say they are equal, Marvel and DC.
Blade was Marvel's first hit.
It came before them, but it wasn't a hit at the time.
@@4D1Characterror It was a huge hit at the time, especially for an r-rated movie. Were you even born because it sounds like you weren't there.
@@BrimsHL it was not a HUGE hit. It didn't lose money. But people weren't talking about it like Xmen. Buzz wasn't crazy. The Matrix came about a year later and got huge numbers for an r rated movie. Blade only kinda got past blockbuster status.
@@4D1Characterror it was still a hit and a hit for an R rated movie. The only reason Spider-Man and X-Men made more was because they were PG-13. Everybody and their mother was talking about it. Including white people. Obviously you have no idea what was going on at the time.
@@BrimsHL it was the first r rated movie I saw in theaters. I loved the movie. I know there was no one talking about it because other than my brother who saw it with me, there was no one talking about it around me, and no big buzz about it on TV.
Compared to other movies of the 90s- True Lies Die Hard 3, Schindler's List, The Rock, it didn't get much attention or as much money.
Who made the thumbnail? 😂
I despise the MCU and DCEU but I love comic book films like The Batman, Joker, and Blade. Cinematic universes are overrated.
Sometimes when i'm watching marvel movies ,i feel like if i'm watching a cutscene from a video game
DC Elseworld movies >>>>>>whole DCEU trash
Nothing but facts
just depends who is making the film, not neccesarily the company
honestly, that's why I liked marvel projects like Loki, both doctor strange films, Avengers AoU, Wandavision, and the netflix shows. They have a visual style that's different from the standard cookie cutter MCU projects. Even the Iron Man films had a lot of dirty and raw shots that made it feel real while still keeping the superhero tone up. The first Thor films had a lot of dutch angles which I honestly liked but many didn't. AoU, a film criticized by many for absolutely no reason at all, has a lot of beautiful shots that reflect the tone of the scene or conversations. The dinner party, the scenes with ultron, the banters between banner and tony, all of it have colour gradings that reflect the tone. The Iron Man vs Hulk fight also had a lot of cool shots that made it iconic. The winter soldier too, had a lot of raw shots that made it feel a lot more grounded than say Civil War. I think, ultimately, the reason why Marvel doesn't incorporate cool cinematography is due to the audience. Some appreciate darker tones, some prefer light, some prefer wider shots, some prefer more blurred shots. Instead of trying to please everyone with these, they please no one and try to keep it simple to focus more on the quality of the shot rather than the way its shot.
You'll really see a more creative direction from Phase 1 and Phase 4, the so called black sheep of the Marvel films.
Yeah I agree, I know Eternals was critically panned, but man that movie had some beautiful shots. Phase 4 tried, but story and anchors for driving story just wasn't there. I agree with Loki and Wandavision, the creativity was thriving during the pandemic.
It's fascinating how much solely on visuals we perceive things differently.
MCU have dark and thoughtful storyline like Winter Soilder and Civil War.
In WS the scene where Zola describes people ironically giving away there privacy to protect that very thing , gave me chills. Honestly, it's haunting to imagine being surrounded by nothing other than machine and it tells you how it's manipulating humans into submission that even by their own will.
But I think most tend to forgot this critical scene bcs it is shot in generic style. If that same Zola scene was shot in The Batman style, with intricate camera dynamic and immersive perspective & sound then it would hv impacted lot strongly. Creating a lasting impression.
By the way, Deadpool and Wolverine looks pretty good. The director did insist on shooting in real life location which is paying off.
So I guess , Feige might from now on let director hv more say.
I hope if MK movie gets made they bring Matt Reeve or a director with tasteful cinematography bcs the contrast of white suit with dark background and a gaint Moon glowing behind MK will be iconic. But it can only be done with accomplished cinematographer.
I hope the upcoming Dc cinematic universe movies are visually good
I love both Marvel and DC Films. But I remember much more memorable shots from DC Movie than Marvel, take Batman 2022 for example, during the penguin chase scene and when batman crashes penguin, look at the scene where batman drifts to show the impact of penguins vehicle. Beautiful shot
If DC ever go through yt comments i hope they know we love their art style just the way it is,to this day the 2022 Batman movie is my favorite movie; sound design,unique shots,LUTs etc its the pinnacle of what i know DC represents - dark coolness
Okay how come this doesn't have tons of more views? I've personally got no hate towards Marvel but since Endgame it's been kinda drifting further away from me, especially since I too notice and don't like almost every movie having no darker lighting effects and such and the characters not getting the depth they really need, DC's cinemagraphy have been decent for me and doesn't disappoint visually at least and The Batman made it all feel so much more promising again I'm hoping they do bring out such masterpieces to watch and enjoy
it feels like marvel are made for kids (like those people cheering at a screen) and dc for adults, marvel is so colorful , predictable, no think just enjoy (and full of jokes), while dc is ..cinema, serious movies for your senses to enjoy in silence.
5:30 LMAO
Marvel did find out how to make consistently success movies, BUT then they lost their touch completely! Most of their movies since Endgame have been flops.
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel since i own there 2010s-2000s blu-rays and posters of marvel and encyclopedia book so i dont care about your childish speech kid! marvel is king with my dc
But isn't it bcos marvel movies are more realistic and relatable, that why they're loved?
They’re loved because they’re treated like sports.
Exactly why they are loved 😂
I prefer the vivid and bold approach of many of the Marvel movies like Guardians of the Galaxy and Iron Man. The studio still uses night scenes, moody shadows and colorized effects at times. While cinematic might have a lot more post edit creative style, plus lighting effects while filming, I am not a fan of the overly dark look of the latest Batman when it gets too gritty and very little light on set. Perhaps somewhere in the middle of both extremes is best. Pick the scenes for the best lighting setup for the story. Half cinematic perhaps? Games of Thrones went there on cinematic lighting at times and that was good. Except the final White Walkers battle was far too dark tones as many fan critics say.
DC has always been way more aesthetically pleasing to me and the characters have a lot more style and flair (i also love the fact that their villains are more complex in both personality and style) and overall has way more contrasts between the dark and bright (sometimes neon) colors while the marvel is kinda always just kinda bland and lacking to me but that being said i still love them both (maybe DC just a tad more...)
DC is better, objectively speaking, setting aside personal tastes or woke criticism
Give Martin a watchmen graphic novel
Already a legend made a movie based on that but it doesn't completely recognized sadly
@@dedP00L the director 's cut. The theatrical was mid
I think this is hard to judge when you have so many directors, writers, production designers and Directors of Photography that are involved.
personally, i like the more colorful approach marvel took, but the excessive cg has gotta stop
Superman's my favorite DC character. Do I like Man of Steel? Yes. Do I think Superman needs to be all dark and depressed? No. He's a guy wearing red and blue spandex with undies over his pants and a freakin cape. How can you take yourself THAT seriously while wearing that? Notice that Marvel characters with really elaborate and colorful costumes tend to take themselves less seriously. Like Iron Man and Spider-Man. And then there's Captain America. Yeah he's wearing the American flag, but he's more serious than his counterparts because he's a soldier. He's not a rich boy in an armor or a high school kid in spandex. He's a soldier, and those are his uniform. It's a symbol from a time where the US was a beacon of hope, and the people in the Marvel universe look to Captain America for hope because that's what he represents by wearing red, white and blue. So just because a movie looks darker doesn't mean it's better.
Great video. You highlighted points that I as a movie watcher don't typically think about in regard to various filmmaking styles. It's kinda like how the first 4 Harry Potter films have bright coloring and r more adventurous and light-hearted, but the 5th and 6th have very dark lighting with more tension. Marvel films have been nominated for/have won Oscars, so they are also capable of being serious and reach Scorcese's standard like some DC films have.
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my poster and enyclopedia marvel and dc books so no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so cry more
Because DC is for adults & Marvel is for kids. Both serve their respectful purpose
X men definitely isn’t for kids
But aside from that, DC is darker, grittier, and meant for more mature audiences
Marvel is more fun, colorful, and lighthearted
Lmao. What? 😂This is how I know you.know nothing about these brands outside of the typical monoculture 😂😂
@@thedappermagician6905 say the marvel fanboy. tf outta here dip shit 🏌️
I Get Martin Scorsese I'd Rather Direct Something like Swamp Thing (2019) not a movie I know than something like Shang Chi I'm used to Films like Rocky Terminator even RoboCop also some of my favorite films are based on DC Comics Imprints so there's that
DC is also more realistic
WOWW I thought the complete opposite
I wouldn’t agree. Both can be either unrealistic or realistic. Daredevil is more “realistic”, Avengers is more unrealistic. The Batman is more realistic, SnyderCut is more unrealistic
They are both about superheroes 😂
Right so a guy flying at the speed of sound is realistic cool ( not dissing DC I love superman) I do prefer marvel but most stuff after endgame hasn’t been good
Ya flying without any forces and a lasse that lights up and makes you tell the truth pretty realistic 💀 bruh superhero movies supposed to be unrealistic lol
DC always make movements in slow motion. A hero walks, slow motion. A hero jumps, slow motion. A hero attacks, slow motion. Group of heroes poses in front of the camera? Slow motion. annoying slow motion.
DC falls flat when it assumes it is Marvel's competition. That's when they release trash like BvS and Justice League.
After making WATCHMEN, that shoulve been the point they realized how special they really are. I don't understand why they lowered themselves after Man of Steel to do those "power ranger amusement park" films.
Thank God, Matt Reeves has revived that DC flamboyance. THE BATMAN has brought back that feeling i got from WATCHMEN.
No, DC falls flat to its competition like Josstice League, Shazam (I enjoyed btw), The Flash, Aquaman 2, and Black Adam.
Zach Snyder made Watchmen is which is why I loved Man Of Steel, BvS, and Zach Snyder Justice League. This wasn’t Snyder fault, it’s Warner Brothers.
Came here for the question of why Marvel and DC films look different. I didn't know this was a commercial for software. There go 11:40 down the drain.
😂😅
Marvel movies don't put enough effort when it comes to cinematography but DC movies surely do
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my poster no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so who cares for u!
Isn't The Flash a DC movie?
I see you're not into the superhero genre so much, so the answer to your question is overwhelmingly yes.
@@jeanp.5929Thank you. The Flash is not a dark and moody film as portrayed here and neither is Wonderwoman. When the presenter says DC movies are darker/whatever do they really mean Batman as thinking about it Superman films weren't that dark and moody either.
@@AdamDeSteCroix meh not really, the first wonder woman movie was pretty cinematic
While DC struggles narratively, their cinematography, costume design and musical scores have always been superior to Marvel in my opinion.
Yep
Movies are not meant to imitate reality to feel closer to the viewers. Finally someone says it. Thank you.
scroces wrote a superhero flm already. it was taxi driver.
DC uses a lot of dark scenes and shadows to hide their crappy FX department's shoddy work.
Notice how the top DC movies are all Gotham movies, dealing with the same characters, very similar themes, and sit Outside of the DCEU.
to the people saying marvel is shallow, this whole video is nothing but a shallow explaination for people who have no clue or havent seen any super hero movies
You can’t think.
Marvel - kid friendly
DC - dark and violent
The reason I'm a DC fan and think marvel is boring is because DC has something that marvel doesn't
Marvel doesn't need dark and violent to be entertaining. They have a rich lineup of characters with actual substance and depth.
Sure, DC might have its little edge and gore, but that just makes it feel like it's trying too hard.
Marvel is all about fun, action, and adventure. It's like a comic book come to life. And let's be honest, who doesn't love a good superhero story?
So keep your dark and violent DC stuff. I'll stick with Marvel and its colorful, entertaining roster of heroes.
primarily it is a marketing decision first: marvel targets kids, while DC goes for young adults of all ages 😁😁
The moment I saw the thumbnail I knew something was off. Editing a picture just to get clicks is low and disrespectful.
DCU plots are majorly Noir, MCU plots are Thrillers. It will be interesting to see how James Gunn approaches Noir films
the way Marvel broke their rule with Doctor Strange 2
Dr Strange 2 could have been really good, but execs got their mitts on it in post.
Marvel did an amazing job harmonizing the infinity saga films, especially with the odds against it. It was not meant to be "Tree of life" cinema... it's an ode to our childhood. Dc arguably accomplished some of that in isolated instances ( 2-3 characters. Christopher Nolan's work probably the apex.) But overall failed to harmonize stories and character arc's consistently AND visually. Recently Marvel has gotten too lazy with green screen , and DC has gotten more inconsistent. It's deeper than simply visuals, though that is a big part of it.
DC are money makers, Marvel too...the best for DC are Superman I and II, Batman 1989 and Batman Returns, TDK trilogy, Snyder's JL trilogy, Joker, The Suicide Squad, The Batman...W's all around...Gunn's DCU coming too
Simple = for the masses
It's hard to digest a lot of heavy, concentrated products. Especially hard to do it in quantity.
Marvel got the formula right, you can watch it at any mood and switch off 95% of your brain.
The always more "complex" formula tend to lose even if it's "better" it' became a niche, think
League > Dota
Street Fighter > Tekken
Fortnite/Valo > CS
Then again, DC is just too messy without a proper DCEU except that short period
Kids growing up all knew Superman, Batman but MCU totally made characters like Cap/Thor/Iron-Man a household name.
You miss the point. DC movies are called dark not because of the colour pallet, but because of the tone. marvel may be blowing up entire civilisation, but they also crack stupid jokes every 10 minutes, so it's hard to take them seriously.
Its why im worried James Gunn will flatten Dc's visual lingo
That’s why DCU to me is a flop already, they’re copying MCU already. DCU = MCU lmao
DC have great animation series and animated movies whereas Marvel has better movies..
Nope.
dc actually feels like movies at least in style
Id say Marvel definitely aims more for the “futuristic sci fi” theme in its art direction while DC tries to be more gritty and dark. Marvel’s visuals are cleaner and more refined to communicate the idea of a society superior to our own, while DC’s visuals are typically dirtier and more muted to convey that this world is less of a technological utopia and more of a grimy, almost dystopian society where life might actually be worse than it is irl. Its less about cool flashy effects and more about raw realistic action
I feel conflicted about this. Because, I don't Marvel movies for treating theirs movies the same type movies. But, I don't like DC comics movies for focusing mostly on Batman instead of others characters they have.
Funny how they try to show why marvel movies aren't that good but they are actually much more liked by the audience than dc😂
The audiences tend to be idiots bud.
@@Mathnicheguybro is coping hard 😂
Marvel movies are just better structured and more immersive
@@medusa1358 Not really.
that is all changing, james gunn a marvel director has already made a movie unlike previous dc movies 'suicide squad'
what these directors doesn't get is that you have to see superheroes movies through the actual people who grew up reading the comics and watching it's animated series lense. Not their own exagerated film perception. Marvel works cos it delivers what actual superheroes fans like and want to see. Not a highly dramatic cut all dark and shady, but a colorful display full of action and excitement. As long as DC keep missing it, will keep on failing behind Marvel
Most DC movies always looked wonky to me and awkward with the exception of movies like the Dark Knight. Which was phenomenal.
who cares for u souless humen i love old dceu movies stop being a man child i got it all on blu-ray dum dum with my dark knight movies with marvel!!
Great mask catgirl. Greatest mask in the history of films
I prefer DC
The deference for me is that Marvel mostly happens at daytime, while DC mostly happens at Nighttime.
Hey Movie LUTs, can you credit your VO please?
The VO is most definitely Ai.
dc under zack snyder🤌
Not a fan of Marvel but wandavision was exceptional.
who cares for u souless humen i love marvel with my dc movies on blu-ray with my posters and encyloepdia books so no one cares about your childish speech i love old marvel and 2010s of marvel with my dc and batman movies on blu-ray so who cares for u!
please lower the volume
What AI voice software is used for these videos?
Not the dc people totally dissing marvel 😂 I love dc’s style of filming and respect the grind 😊 for me, I’d rather watch a marvel movie just because I like some of the character’s stories better & bc I actually do like the grand, almost fake looking entrances of the characters. But I really love the idea of actually making a camera lenses dirty for a shot. I also noticed marvel’s “bland” visual style did make it feel more relatable, and I liked that part of mcu movies. Although, many of the fight scenes were very immersive and not at all bland. Overall, I like both styles of filming and I think both franchises are very successful. (Just the dissing was a little unprofessional, unless there is a reason im missing, which I probably am… I’m only going off of this video)
marvel movies are homogenous. theyre shot on the same cameras, their action scenes are choregraphed by the same people. its creatively stifling.
Marvel is for Kids, DC is for men.
???
Cause marvel is for kids.
Maturity is when you realise that "Marvelization" of modern films is why cinema is actually dying. the over-stuffed cringe humor in serious scenes, woke agendas, corny dialogues, predictable plotholes and this has been consistent not only in MCU since Endgame but also in other mainstream commercial movies. After sometime all this CGI fest becomes a visual diarrhoea because its all generic. one of the main reasons why the DCEU which started with a serious approach, fell off after trying to copy MCU in Josstice League. As a comic book fan of both Marvel and DC , i just hate watching these new MCU/DC movies, however The Batman n Joker are still promising.
Exactly, facts.
DC fails cos they rarely give any other heroes a chance and when they fail when they try one like Green Lantern, they go back to Batman.
Marvel succeeds from comic book failure by giving different studios the right to make films. Hence, Fox Sony and Paramount were able to introduce different characters. 70+ characters have been introduced to live action. Whilst DC only has 15+
Also, every time they introduce batman they fail to give us his sidekicks.
Why does Joker have his own film, its completely unnecessary
Constantine and the Burton/nolan batmans were pretty much the only good dc movies. Marvel movies are just more accurate, better dialoge, perfect casting.
DC so strong
Marvel movies only have brief moments of drama between fights. 🤣 You lost all credibility with that remark.
Watchmen DC is a gem