Night At The Ark Encounter | Eric Hovind and Tim Chaffey
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 дек 2021
- Experience the Ark Encounter like never before….AT NIGHT! Join Eric Hovind and Tim Chaffey for part two of this two part series as they uncover the mysteries of God’s amazing Creation, explore the worldwide flood, and give you answers that satisfy your thirst for truth!
Eric Hovind plays as Derrick Dailey, a security guard skeptical of Christianity on a temp assignment guarding the Ark Encounter. Adventure ensues as the museum exhibits and Jim (AIG's Tim Chaffey) are determined to open Derrick's mind to the truth of Scripture.
WANT MORE?
Become a Creation Today Partner at CreationToday.org to engage with the experts, and ask questions LIVE.
Become a Creation Today Partner at CreationToday.org/Partner
SALVATION
What Must I Do To Be Saved?
creationtoday.org/about/how-t...
SCHEDULE
LIVE Conversations each Wednesdays at 12 Noon: CreationToday.org/Live
RESOURCES
Get Equipped with Awesome Apologetic resources: www.CreationStore.org
CONNECT
Sign Up for our emails: creationtoday.org/signup
FOLLOW US:
Website: creationtoday.org
Website: erichovind.com
Twitter: / erichovind
Twitter: / creationtoday
Instagram: / erichovind
Instagram: / creationtoday
Facebook: / erichovind
Facebook: / creationtoday Кино
Thanks for sharing the clips of Dr. Menton, a great & faithful Christian warrior. ✝
Great vid! Can't wait to visit this spring!
Thank you so much for this film!!
Nice! 👍
I hope they make a sequel where Bumblebee transforms into his robot form and helps in the fight against evolution. Though I must admit, I was a bit surprised to see Bumblebee actually featured in the end credits.
I tend to be generally critical of the videos that you guys do, but these were quite fun.
Awesome movie!
A film and end message for God's glory when so many other films are for the glory of mankind. Thank you, Lord, for the love that You shed on us through the ministry and sacrifice of your only begotten Son, the Lord Jesus Christ.
@Ivar Boneless The Bible says "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the Lord that he had made man upon the earth, and it grieved him at his heart." Genesis 6: 5-6. Still, the Lord gave mankind 120 years of warnings, which they disregarded and rejected, not believing God--a problem with mankind all along--seen in your comment. What is truly amazing is that God chose to save eight people alive and repopulate the earth. God hates sin, but in mercy, he sent his only begotten son to die for his people of all nations, kindreds and tongues that repent of their sins and confess Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
Who is here from Gutsick Gibbon's response to this that has already over four times the views of this one?
That was so good! Very impressive for a 12-hour smartphone film!
Had I seen the movie first, and THEN was told it was "filmed" with a cellphone, I would have thought it highly unlikely! Great work (artistically AND spiritually)!
I like the faulty logic here at 20:07, " if you start with Creationism then the 'science' confirmed the Bible."
Can you expand on that? I don't see a problem starting with a different viewpoint to come to a different conclusion. Way back when I was at school I was taught that all Scientific theory starts with an assumption. I guess if you start with a very different assumption you could end up with a very different theory?
Same
@@PaulHardingham The problem with Creationism is you don't start from a neutral perspective. You start with God done did it. And they twist the data and the results to fit that narrative. Science doesn't just make random guesses. Scientists build theories of observation and peer review studies. That means nothing they claim doesn't already have a bunch of evidence backing it. You should also understand that a scientific theory is not what normal people consider a theory what's your referring to is a hypothesis. A scientific theory is as close to proven as possible.
@@PaulHardingham you don't presuppose the conclusion then draft an argument to lead to that specifically. That's called fallacious reasoning.
Science goes here's a possibility, we can test it with these parameters, then the evidence given from that data set of testing infers if the possibility has a validity to it or not.
Science doesn't create a theory based of an assumption, only based on what the literal evidence shows regardless of the person's on bias.
Creationism literally can't test its assumption, and it even has to dismiss and excuse evidence and its own bible to try and masquerade stuff to fit its assumption to try and create a false validity for it. To the extent it has to create random made up ideas with no evident basis to do so to try and explain or excuse away issues that invalidate creationism. This is akin to lying.
Wow! Was NOT expecting a love scene!!
1:05 if something ever happened to the ark encounter, I hope this Carnotaurus Gladiator diorama survives and I’m rich enough to buy it.
9:44 that’s why you can just throw a dolphin in the lake and it’ll be fine. Definitely not an issue if it isn’t salt water…
How does the hourly night guard have a nicer car than me? 😂. I love this. Great job putting this together guys. He wasn’t joking about getting steps in. This place is massive.
Good job guys! Real science is on the side of the Bible! The hate comments are from those that suppress the truth because of their unrighteousness. Romans 1
1:50 Yeah, you are. You do remember when one of the employees of the Creation Museum told you about the place, right?
That was fun...thank you Eric.
let me guess - your religion is not subject to questioning, right?
Is yours?
@@PaulHardingham what do you think?
@@PaulHardingham I've shared my ideas for questioning; nobody wants to touch it because they can't.(your finding a little mistake in 40 days and nights is so minor an obviously correctable, it's not even worth answering)
@@PaulHardingham and, oh yes, this is proof your religion is not subject to criticism; it's why you believe; so, you can't be criticised. Same thing with Kent Hovind and Ken Ham's of the world Ken Ham and his associates just say "stop criticising us", just like Vladimir Putin. they can't refute the facts and logic brought to them. Apparently neither can you.
@@PaulHardingham you people are like little kids who you have to command to get them to do anything - wake up Johnny? "Why mom" - so you can eat Johnny "why eat mommy?" - so you can live dear - "why live"
Do you take the bible as your pure truth or more of guide lines? Because there are several parts of the bible that many refuse to bring into their scripture such as the gospel or Judas Iscariot
bent rock - um, lets see here, ever seen footprints in concrete after people walk on it during the rain? You know what lava is? Yea, heat, stress, earthquakes make solid rock malleable.
And, oh look, a quick look at the geology wiki shows . . . geologists know about these bent rock formations. They're called anticlines, and what do they say - oh, the top layers are the new layers, and the insides are older layers.
The reason for the human body to stop healing is because of a cells tolemeres which are used up as it replicates, so it only can replicate 40 times
I am not a believer, but this is good stuff.
Hey Charlie, would love to chat sometime if you are up for it.
fish and whales on the ark; well, for one, the bible says it took 2(in one story, 7 in another); so, Noah would have to bring 2(or 7) of every aquatic creature . . . you changed what the bible says for your convenience.
The bible just says "Kind" that's a vague word, just like sin. Sin is a like a catchall phrase. You do know what it means to define things? Versus vague words that can mean anything.
bacteria and single cells do not take up the majority of species list.
If sea life could survive a Flood just fine, why do you try to impose the stupidity into the Flood account by requiring aquatic animals to be removed from their perfectly survivable habitat and be placed onto a boat?
(What is your TRUE ISSUE?)
Why did you say 2 of each kind?
The Bible says 2 of each kind for the unclean animals and 7 of each kind for the clean animals.
"You shall take with you seven each of every clean animal, a male and his female; two each of animals that are unclean, a male and his female; also seven each of birds of the air, male and female, to keep the species alive on the face of all the earth." Genesis 7:2&3
Because you gotta twist the narrative to fit your ideology
The bible is littered with contradictions.
@@bartbannister394 it’s basically a division made by God about animals you can and can’t eat. Cows/Sheep/Goats are clean but pigs aren’t. So make sure you take extra of the animals you’ll want to herd so you have food is basically what the text is saying.
Gen 6:6 - " And on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart" - ah yea, got repented at "his" Mistakes. Somehow this doesn't hit Hovind boy and his sidekick squarely in the face.
He even says in the next section Gen 6:7 - " And the LORD said, man whom I have created from the face of the earth; , and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air;
whell there are many sweet whater dolphins,and whales today, that is true !
Noah's ship landed on the mountain of Ararat, where no Noah's ship has been found- hmm. Except for some christians reading into mountain formations like how people find pictures of people in the clouds and constellations. Oh yea, Amos 5:8 - god controls the constellations. What is god doing controlling an arbitrary pattern of stars made up by man? Oh, I know, men made up that story about god, just like they made up their god - see Psalms 115.
SMH. The Bible does NOT say that the Ark landed on "the mountain of Ararat"! Why do you do this??
Why are you so willing to embrace lies, misrepresentations, and deceit instead of wanting to know the truth? God is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him. If you SINCERELY want to know the truth, then try seeking God (your Creator).
Jesus said that "if you continue in my word, then you are indeed my disciples, and YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE!"
Genesis 8:4 says.... "upon the mountains of Ararat", it does not say "the mountain of Ararat". You also say "where no Noah's ship has been found" - would you really expect to find a wooden structure on a hill/mountain side from thousands of years ago when it was exposed to the elements anyway? Just because something from 1,000's of years ago can't be found now doesn't mean it never existed so I don't think it's a valid argument against it.
@@PaulHardingham you have to take these christians by the hand on everything . . .
did the bible say Noah's family members helped out - nope. I guess the not everything is in the bible as christians like to tell me and . .. you!
why is everything forty days and forty nights - the Israelites supposedly stayed in Sinai(a desert with no water) for 40 days and 40 nights, and the flood was forty days/nights - hmm . . . cartoon science and history?
I had a boss who liked the number $14,000. Grinding wheels were costing him $14,000 a year, the compressor cost $14,000 to fix, people coming in late were costing him $14,000 a year, etc. etc. A tall tale sounds more plausible if it involves specific numbers.
Where did you get the idea that the Israelites stayed in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights?
@@PaulHardingham - I think it was forty years, like it matters. The Millennium Falcon made the Kessel run in 12 parsecs. Numbers in legends are just meant to mean "very big' or "a long time".
@@hamletksquid2702 it matters because Flashgordon made a specific allegation
@@PaulHardingham - He misspoke days for years. He's talking about the coincidences involving forty, not how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. The details really don't matter. Do you care whether it's Krishna or Vishnu whose ninth avatar will destroy this iteration of the world? If the number nine kept popping up, that might be worth notice, but the fairy tales aren't.
Eric hovind is funny little guy
The bible did not say Noah only brought eggs, or babies. It did not specify. And regarless, the ark could not fit millions of eggs, much less babies onboard.
It wasn't all eggs, but 1) Where did you get that there were "millions"?? (I'm guessing you made it up), and 2) Please show us the calculations you used to conclude that millions of eggs wouldn't fit on the Ark.
Seriously, it's looking like you are willing to lie to attack the Bible. Have you examined your heart to see why you expend so much time and energy to attack the Word of Your Creator when He loves you enough to become a man and die for all the lies you've ever told and all the pain you've caused others in your life?
@@Bildad1976 bible clearly states 7 of each clean animal and 2 of each unclean animal.
Ark encounter is a joke. It showcases clearly that the animals literally couldn't fit on board.
Not even taking into account food needed, fresh water etc.
Its quite literally pathetic to believe it's a real event. Especially when there's enough physical evidence now literally sitting there showing the irrationality and invalidity of the ark being possible.
They couldn't even physically build it the way the bible stated due to the wood started breaking and couldn't support the weight so they had to use steel and concrete for a large majority of the build. Including thr addition of aircons as the air wasn't able to stay fresh enough due to the stupidity of the construction.
Imagine dying due to lack of oxygen simply because the boats design wouldn't let air move freely. And with the amount of animald breathing they'd all be dead within the first few minutes, this isn't even taking into consideration they couldn't fit to start with.
all those millions of babies needed to eat. and some species grow fast in a year; in fact, most species outside of Homo Sapiens grow to teens in a year at least. One of the interesting things about Homo Sapiens is that we don't grow so big within a year or so. But all other animals grow very big . . . or, they die within a week or so.
Faulty assumptions again. Here's a clue: How did the animals get on the Ark in the first place??
@@Bildad1976 Oh oh I know they didn't because the bible is bullshit.
I don't know how to feel about having women writing and editing a Christian movie. That's kind of like a sermon. It's teaching.
"A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent” (1 Timothy 2:11-12).
Do I have to go through the whole Gen 6 thing again? What part of god repented from making his own mistakes does these guys not understand?
Flash, you misrepresent what God's Word says. Read it again.
@@Bildad1976 that's as bad as the bible writers saying Satan made David count the people to cover up the actual Samuel passage that says God made him do it - you're crazy
Hovind's sidekick totally missed the point about Mars. Mars has a grand canyong that dwarfs the Grand Canyon of the Earth. It's called Valles Marinares. And it's as big as the U.S. The Grand Canyon is only in the northern Arizona. Don't you think if there was a global flood on Earth, it would make a grand canyon far bigger than on Mars, to dwarf the size of Valles Marinares? Of course not, because then your've bible would be proven wrong.
Why do you assume that every flood has the same size features, or that Mars had the same topography as Earth (before, during, and after)???
You have a knack for misrepresenting.
@N/A the point escapes you; if there was a Noah's flood, then why isn't there a grand canyon twice the size of Valles Marinares? Instead of some tiny little canyon in Northern Arizona?
@N/AThat's something your martians and the flood have in common as in nonexistent.