Facts: 1. The linesman made an incorrect call 2. Kei hit the ball in (down the line) before the call was made (play 10:15 onwards at 0.25x) 3. Busta was running the opposite direction of Kei's shot regardless of the linesman's call 4. Replaying the point would be unfair to Kei 5. Umpire made a judgement call based on who would have won the point regardless of the linesman call and whether the call was of any hindrance to either players, 6. Busta did not handle his emotions well, he could have won the match if he was able to mentally regroup himself (he was still in the lead) 7. One of the commentators is clearly biased towards Busta (lol) Great game from both players. GO KEI
@@ciondari Rules were man-made and are there to ensure the game's fairness, if the rules were enforced and led to unfairness then there is no point of having rules in the first place. This is also why we still have umpires to make humane judgements, if every linesman made an incorrect call like this, it would be very unfair to the opponent that hit a clean winner in. Anyway the only point of contention to replay the point would be if it was possible for Busta to actually return Kei's winner which was clearly not the case. Also, it was not match point, Busta was in the lead, he led his emotions overwhelm him. Also, that resentment built up from Busta does not excuse him from throwing a tantrum (if a 10-year-old kid did that you would have stereotyped him as a spoilt brat in need of discipline), so quite frankly, I'm glad the more calm and mature player won :)
Unfair is how you're depicting it. It's a GS match dude! Tantrums? Ask yourself if you were there at his place. Right, the emotions got better of him, he could have won the match from 8-6 but it doesn't justify your moulded explanation. It's not preaching fair as per one person. It's rules that stand.
Super Kei...5 hrs..6 min. This match will be remember for a long long time, it will 100 percent bring Up All Japan n Asia Fan, Children n Player who believe Nothing is Impossible. Fully Respect and Salute to You Kei. You are a Role Model for Japan n All Asia.
Great final set tiebreak. One of the best I've ever seen. On the subject of whether the point should've been replayed or not I think the umpire made the right call. If you pause it when the line judge calls out and look at where the ball is, the ball is already on Carreno Busta's side of the court which means the call came after Nishikori hit it (in other words it was a late call). Not only that Carreno Busta was already going in the opposite direction when the call was made so it didn't hinder him and also means Nishikori's shot was a clean winner. That's how I saw it.
@tomr6955 The umpire was indeed wrong, but not for the reason you described. The out call clearly didn't affect carreno busta as he was already sprinting full force to the other side of the court. It should have been replayed as that's the custom for every one of those types of calls; you don't just make a decision based on feeling. It's protocol to replay it as the announcers said
Juha This Australian Open is full of mysteries never know what could happen players like Bautista Shut and correno were never noticed before but in this tournament they proved they too were the serious contenders watch for them for rest of the season too .....anything can happen am hoping Kei beating Novak for a first time ever in a GS on Wednesday
true. and US open: Nishikori vs wawrinka in 2014 ruclips.net/video/NUtviBHVqp0/видео.html French Open: djokovic vs wawrinka in 2014 Wimbledon: Nadal vs federe in 2009 my best match
throw roland garros in the mix also, terrible highlights, 1 minute highlight for an epic match, that shows 3 points faaar from being the best of the match. Big up to AO this year, highlights for every match, all the interviews, and special videos for whole games or tiebreakers like this one when it's worth while, its a very good publicity to the event and to tennis in general. hopefully the other majors will learn from it.
@@mahdixn I'm watching Australian Open for the very first time. And after many years, I became interested in tennis again, thanks to Naomi Osaka and Kei Nishikori. Australian Open is doing a wonderful job. The remaining matches are really exciting.
I thought it as well. I was streaming the live score and when the Spaniard got the 7th score, I thought I would see the word FINAL. Much to my delight, it was a different rule. And Nishikori prevailed. The Spaniard lied when he said the ball was called out before Nishikori hit the ball. The Spaniard didn't make any point. And there's no way he could serve the ball back. The more experienced player won.
The call was clearly after the hit, don’t really understand why the commentator says otherwise. The point was Nishikori’s anyway, so no robbing was done imo. Replaying the point would have been robbing Nishikori..
By the rules point should be replayed. Out was called in Nishikori's field, hit after that can't be counted. Umpire was wrong. If Nishikori hit line (and Busta didn't hit ball) and reff calls out, that should be point for Nishi. This decision was against rules.
Congrats Kei!!!!🇯🇵 That was one of the memorable matches ever you did! You are super cool cos you have already won three full set games in this AO. I know you are tired, but pls make me believe that you can defeat the world no.1 player, Novak Djokovic in QF. Thank you for such a wonderful match!
but thats the rule. Even if its a simple shot in the open court, if linesman calls out before the opponent hits the ball, you have to replay. Not sure here whether linesman call came before or after Nishikori hit it
@@nikhildehlan6360 The rules leave room for interpretation. The umpire is totally allowed to decide, if a point is going to be replayed or not. It is his decision and in this case it is a 100% correct one. Rules are there to create fairness and thats why the umpire has the right to judge it based on the situation. Busta is a sore loser, it was disgusting to watch.
"The Chair Umpire must decide if the original “out” call was a hindrance to either player. If it was a hindrance, the point shall be replayed. If it was not a hindrance, the player who hit the ball wins the point." www.atptour.com/en/corporate/rulebook Nishikori was mid-swing and Pablo was definitely sprinting to the other side BEFORE the call. There was no hindrance to either player, hence the umpire awarded the point to the player that hit the ball.
I see Nishikori have such a strong mental strength. He never smile or expose his feelings easliy before the match ends. And do not step back at the very important point. Such a warrior. And last but not least, polite. Chaitrumpire did the right thing. Even the linesman's call was made before the hitting, both players already decided the direction where to hit and where to run. Which means, Nishikori's raquet was already on his swing and Busta's lags are already moving to his direction. Call did not change the outcome even it was made before hit. It is why the umpire give a point to Nishikori.
Federer Roger he smiled when the ball was incorrectly called out, like in his mind he was thinking "lol, here we go". Lucky for him he's calm and smiling, while his opponent was angry and lost his calm and the match after that. Then swear at umpire while walking off after loss. What a sore loser. Out classed.
I haven't seen such technical and masterful matches like this for a long time. Both players demonstrated just an ideal performances: Pablo was like a wall and beat off every ball, and Kei played extremely cleverly. Respect for both players!!!!!
Nishikori deserves a grand slam title. Not only this match, for all the past years. Japanese and Asians should be proud of him. Might lack of power and physical stamina, you still could win by your efforts and attitude. GO KEI
Regardless of whether the call came after or before the hit, why did the umpire let Carreno Busta challenge if he was going to lose the point either way?
FeatureTennis because if the or call was before nishikori hit it, and it was in, then they would have to replay the point. That's what nishikori thought was going to happen. You could see in his reaction. His opponent really thought the call was made before. If you allow it down, it wss almost at the same time. Carreno busta couldn't have won the point any other way but for the replay, that's why he argued so much for it. And it's really ironic because AO officials created the 10 point tie break fur that extra twist at the end and the commentators said it was a shame the extra twist happened at the end!!! In a Normal 7 point tie break carreno busta would have won the match!!!!!!
@@75yellowraven in a normal 7 point tiebreak small mistakes(by officials) like that could matter a bit more than 10 points, and a lot more compared to if there were no tiebreaks.
@@75yellowraven I understand what you're saying, but how can the challenge system hawkeye determine when the out call was made? Doesn't it only show the trajectory of the ball?
@@75yellowraven You got it wrong. It's the player's right to challenge which in turn must be reviewed to determine if the ball was in or out. Once the ball was determined to be in, the Chair Umpire is required to make the judgement whether the linesman call affect the outcome of the play. The umpire made the call that the call did not affect the outcome of the play (i.e. Busta had run the wrong way and was not in position to make a play on the ball independent of the linesman's call). An analogous situation is when a serve is called out but on review seen to be in. The point is sometimes given to the server rather than replayed if the umpire believes the receiver had no play on the ball. That's the rules...
The umpire got it right. The out call CLEARLY came after Nishikori hit the ball, and it was a clean winner while Carreno Busta was racing to the other side of the court. It would’ve been insane to take that point away from Nishikori.
It was the right decision overall but against the rules. The umpire really messed up by allowing Busta to challenge. Still, we all make mistakes although that's probably no consolation to Busta right now
@@iainstewart2102 Correct. It's like a serve that was called out and a return winner (out of reach) after the call. In that situation you have to replay the point...
What an insane match! Could have gone either way but just incredible how Kei stuck with it and willed himself through during the 5th set tiebreaker. This win is massive for Kei's confidence.
Despite what some people are saying the rule is not that the point HAS to be replayed no matter what. It is only to be replayed when the out call affects the outcome of the point. The call and the backhand were simultaneous. The call wasn't before the hit at all. And Carreno Busta was clearly running to the other side before the call. At that point it should be up to the Umpire's discretion and the Umpire made the fairest decision (Nishikori's point) all by the book.
I respect all the arguments that support the umpire. I was a umpire myself and i would say it was a mistake not to replay the point. And I tell you why. Imagine Nishikori misses the backhand. Don`t you think he would have complained that he was hindered by that outcall? Of course he would and that is the reason why the point should be replayed. It would be the fair decision even it would be extremely unlucky for Nishikori.
@@jochenknobel8175 No silly. In that scenario, if Nishikori misses the backhand then he would just challenge the call for a replay. Umpire absolutely made the right decision.
11:13 Nishikori hits the ball one tenth of a second before the linesman calls out. But Busta was already out of the point and was not affected in any way shape of form by the linesman call. So he needs to get his honesty and decency checked. If he was 100% honest and fair about it he would have accepted the umpire's call as natural and probably would have won the match. His will to win got in the way of his sportsmanship. He is still young and he can learn. Hope he does.
@Dennis J. Jansen Thank you ever so much! but to be fair the rule just states the obvious don't you think? I mean if the rule was any different it would be doing harm to the sport.
One of the commentators is clearly on Carreno Busta's side. Before the "controversial call," he called one of Nishikori's 2nd serve out. He kept mentioning it until someone had told him that the ball actually caught the back of the line. So I'm not surprised he was adamant about being on Carreno Busta's side when the call was clearly made after the Nishikori hit the ball. Thank goodness the chair umpire was impartial.
The umpire was right, Busta moved before the call and Nishikori hit a winner right at the call, Nishikori took the point Busta himself knew he was gonna loose that point
You are right. But it has nothing to do with the moving of busta or that nishikori will take the point for sure. It depends on when the ball was hit and the call of the line judge. And the call was very short after the ball hit nishikoris racket!
Yes.. carrenabusta was very much greedy I gotta say..coz he was 8-5 at that time.. obviously Nishikori deserved that point.. carrenabusta was way far from the ball.. Really liked the way Nishikori kept his nerves..😎😏
@@Fanthomas1742 you don't know miss judge doesn't always be replayed??? Case by case. You don't know about tennis at all. I think you just wanted PBC to win this match.
The rule says that the point should only be replayed if the wrong call impeded the players' game during the time the wrong call was made. For example, if an official calls out and you stop and don't hit the ball but it was clearly within your striking distance, then your opponent challenges the call and it shows that the ball was in, the point will be replayed. However, if a wrong call is made but a player is in no position to hit the ball back to your opponent's court, then the point goes to the other player. No replays. The problem is: the notion of whether or not a player were able to hit the ball back to continue play is purely subjective and the judgment lies under the umpire's discretion. In this particular case, it is as clear as day and night that Carreno Busta was in no position at all to be hindered by the call nor to continue play because he was so far away from the ball after the wrong call was made. The umpire made the right decision.
Totally agree! Similar rule prevails in the NFL if pass is uncatchable, no pass interference is called. Those commentators that made fuss about the umpires (correct) call are just like Shakespeare's "empty vessels"!
Totally agree with the ref. The ref may be exaggerating the explanation a little to explain it, but if you break it down, Nishikori has already swung, and just about hits the ball, when the "out" call is made. A professional player can not wait and react to a shot from Nishikori, as he is too close to the net, they have to guess and just choose to run one way or the other. And this is exactly what Carreno-Busta does...on Nishikori's backswing, he has chosen, and starts legging it to the right. It is obvious, if an "out" call had or had not been made, he would still already have been running that way anyway. It is a shame that Carreno-Busta did not just accept this, let it go and move on to the next point, he may have won. He allowed the fiery Latin character to come out.
It's the eternal debate between common sense and the strict rules. Personally I believe in common sense (and thus this decision), but if you believe in strict application of the rules (which is totally fair as well) then this was the wrong decision@@janveraart307
The late call was made right around the time Kei was hitting the ball, it's hard to tell whether it's right before or after he made contact. But I feel that it is irrelevant here, because the late call was about the shot that PCB made on Kei's side, not Kei's shot on PCB's side. Kei needed to touch the ball and make the shot (which he did) to make sure a replay was granted just in case the call was overruled by Hawkeye (which it was). After that PCB did not have to do anything to earn a replay. He can be standing on the moon and there should still be a replay. So I think the umpire did make a mistake. But Kudos to both fighters for such an amazing match!
the umpire made the right call … he was already in the motion of hitting the ball before the linesman called out … Carreno Busta was already at the other side of the court even when Nishikori was about to hit the ball down the line … so what's the fuss all about?
Dennis J. Jansen Exactly right, so the umpire was right, the bad call didn't change the outcome for either player, so C.B. shouldn't have been rewarded with a replay.
@Dennis J. Jansen Thanks for enlightening me about the rule. I've been asking about it. Nishikori deserves to win. The Spaniard, who we'll not mention the name, should learn from his mistakes.
I agree with the umpire. CB had no play on the ball whatsoever, so had the correct call been made it was Nishikori's point. CB tried to get rewarded for the linesperson's mistake when he'd clearly lost the point. To me Nishikori was already swinging when the out call came.
Love Kei! And 15:00 that coach there beside Chang is *so perfect* as a tennis coach!! Look at him telling Kei just what he needs in this moment when everyone in the arena is going nuts: STAY CALM.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Kei is literally a legend. He knew the distress Carreno was going through and he didn't flaunt to respect him. What a nice guy
4:21 Kei has such a respectful supporter.
この試合現地で生で見てました
本当に5時間が一瞬でした
錦織選手に感動をありがとうございましたと言いたいです
すげえ
いいなぁ
５時間が一瞬という言い回しは日本語として・・・どうかと思う。
充実した時間を過ごせたことは、十分伝わりましたよ。
@@ハム三郎-i7d え？別におかしくないと思うけど
@@ハム三郎-i7d 好きな事に集中すると時間なんかあっという間だろう？
Facts:
1. The linesman made an incorrect call
2. Kei hit the ball in (down the line) before the call was made (play 10:15 onwards at 0.25x)
3. Busta was running the opposite direction of Kei's shot regardless of the linesman's call
4. Replaying the point would be unfair to Kei
5. Umpire made a judgement call based on who would have won the point regardless of the linesman call and whether the call was of any hindrance to either players,
6. Busta did not handle his emotions well, he could have won the match if he was able to mentally regroup himself (he was still in the lead)
7. One of the commentators is clearly biased towards Busta (lol)
Great game from both players. GO KEI
It is not about unfairness it is about what the rules say and the rules say the point should be repeated.
@@ciondari Rules were man-made and are there to ensure the game's fairness, if the rules were enforced and led to unfairness then there is no point of having rules in the first place. This is also why we still have umpires to make humane judgements, if every linesman made an incorrect call like this, it would be very unfair to the opponent that hit a clean winner in.
Anyway the only point of contention to replay the point would be if it was possible for Busta to actually return Kei's winner which was clearly not the case.
Also, it was not match point, Busta was in the lead, he led his emotions overwhelm him.
Also, that resentment built up from Busta does not excuse him from throwing a tantrum (if a 10-year-old kid did that you would have stereotyped him as a spoilt brat in need of discipline), so quite frankly, I'm glad the more calm and mature player won :)
Busta was not able to save that point, agreed. But there are rules. Rules say it should have been replayed.
Unfair is how you're depicting it. It's a GS match dude! Tantrums? Ask yourself if you were there at his place. Right, the emotions got better of him, he could have won the match from 8-6 but it doesn't justify your moulded explanation. It's not preaching fair as per one person. It's rules that stand.
Good points, busta was supposed to win as he led but he cant hold his emotion and that costs dearly
Super Kei...5 hrs..6 min. This match will be remember for a long long time, it will 100 percent bring Up All Japan n Asia Fan, Children n Player who believe Nothing is Impossible. Fully Respect and Salute to You Kei. You are a Role Model for Japan n All Asia.
he is definitely not a role model of india. u can go n talk about other countires from asia. he was lucky af.
h4rder10 stfu
@@h4rder10 Are you an Indian? If you are, shame on you!
@@nemospence2724 LOL
He is going to get his ass handed to him by Novak
4:30くらいで相手選手を称える日本人がいて誇らしかった
これ杉村太蔵みえる
Citdiyfitfufufufufugufykdgwxiuxpudotslhw
Great final set tiebreak. One of the best I've ever seen. On the subject of whether the point should've been replayed or not I think the umpire made the right call. If you pause it when the line judge calls out and look at where the ball is, the ball is already on Carreno Busta's side of the court which means the call came after Nishikori hit it (in other words it was a late call). Not only that Carreno Busta was already going in the opposite direction when the call was made so it didn't hinder him and also means Nishikori's shot was a clean winner. That's how I saw it.
@Tom R The call didn't affect him in any way. Impire took the right decision.
@@Madferit91 it did not affect Busta but by the rules the point should have been replayed.
@tomr6955 The umpire was indeed wrong, but not for the reason you described. The out call clearly didn't affect carreno busta as he was already sprinting full force to the other side of the court. It should have been replayed as that's the custom for every one of those types of calls; you don't just make a decision based on feeling. It's protocol to replay it as the announcers said
If Kei goes on and win the tournament, he'll be the most respected man of the day. True Samurai!
Novak is gonna beat him easily like he always does
except he didn't beat him that easy in rome a few years ago
Other players go on and win tournaments after saving match points all the time, it's no biggie.
@@dannyslammy4379 Lol "few years ago"
Juha This Australian Open is full of mysteries never know what could happen players like Bautista Shut and correno were never noticed before but in this tournament they proved they too were the serious contenders watch for them for rest of the season too .....anything can happen am hoping Kei beating Novak for a first time ever in a GS on Wednesday
何回見ても凄すぎて泣きそうになる
マイケルチャンコーチが最後泣いてるのもさらに追い討ちをかける...
I think this is the best match in the Australian Open, beyond Murray's game.Awesome.
Same here. So many incredible matches this open already. I swear every single match on Margaret Court Arena goes to 5 sets.
it's not looking good in first 2 sets, kei's looking tired, but he survived. unbelievable! congrats Kei!
true. and US open: Nishikori vs wawrinka in 2014 ruclips.net/video/NUtviBHVqp0/видео.html
French Open: djokovic vs wawrinka in 2014
Wimbledon: Nadal vs federe in 2009
my best match
@@guozhou8114 best match ever for me is Australian open 2013 Djokovic-Wawrinka
Steve Jobs/official lol. your self-intro
7-8からのポイントは何回見ても
感動しちゃう…🥺
It is really emotional to see Michael's reaction when Nishikori won the match point. It shows how strong the connection is between Nishikori and him.
どちらが決めても大歓声.
レベルの高さもさることながら, 観てて気持ちのいい試合でした.
本当に感動しました！
何回観ても涙が出ます。
I was at the edge of my seat and holding my breath at the end. Amazing match between the two guys!
Michael Chang was so moved, proud, and elated that he teared up. Awww ... ❤
EPIC MATCH. Best match of 2019 AO.
I wish I could like this 100 times! It couldn't get any better!!
最高の試合
最後まであきらめない 尊敬します！
Loving these highlights/tennis videos! Australian Open has the best tennis vids
Right
Us Open does not provide highlights but teasers... 😂😂
throw roland garros in the mix also, terrible highlights, 1 minute highlight for an epic match, that shows 3 points faaar from being the best of the match. Big up to AO this year, highlights for every match, all the interviews, and special videos for whole games or tiebreakers like this one when it's worth while, its a very good publicity to the event and to tennis in general. hopefully the other majors will learn from it.
@@mahdixn I'm watching Australian Open for the very first time. And after many years, I became interested in tennis again, thanks to Naomi Osaka and Kei Nishikori. Australian Open is doing a wonderful job. The remaining matches are really exciting.
Roland Garros channel is by far the worst
Thought it was a 7 pt tiebrk & was so confused @ 7-5 😂 Go Special Kei!
Same with me. Even @ 8-5 still not win. Confused.
@@nsquylong It was a 1st to 10 win by 2
this 10-point TB thing to decide the match is the worst rule change in the history of tennis... Wimbledon has it right.
I thought it as well. I was streaming the live score and when the Spaniard got the 7th score, I thought I would see the word FINAL. Much to my delight, it was a different rule. And Nishikori prevailed. The Spaniard lied when he said the ball was called out before Nishikori hit the ball. The Spaniard didn't make any point. And there's no way he could serve the ball back. The more experienced player won.
@@nemospence2724 yes.
he lied.
strange. he had loosers attitude from the beginning, while Nishikori looked calm. I learned a lot from it.
The true champion of Asia, lots of love from India
Do you know Nishikori's final set Winning percentage is the highest of all tennis player?
yes
is it stamina?
I did not know that. Thank you.
ok steve
that is why he looked so calm while the opponent is barking all the time.
7-8からのバックハンドストレート、すごすぎ。
It is the best match in 2019!
Come back Kei!
Kei is modest.
iwasbornin92 yeah
djokovic´s bitch
and humble.
Mikel Muñoz Madina Nishikori kicked Djokovic's ass out of the US Open and Basel indoors and bageled him 6-0 . He made Djokovic his bitch.
he is a smug bastard
The call was clearly after the hit, don’t really understand why the commentator says otherwise. The point was Nishikori’s anyway, so no robbing was done imo. Replaying the point would have been robbing Nishikori..
The hit and the call are the same time, but Busta can't save the ball even without the call, definitely.
By the rules point should be replayed. Out was called in Nishikori's field, hit after that can't be counted. Umpire was wrong. If Nishikori hit line (and Busta didn't hit ball) and reff calls out, that should be point for Nishi. This decision was against rules.
I agree the point was Nishikori´s but at the moment the line judge call it out and it isn´t so, the point has to be repeated. Those are the rules
Yes, I agree, the call was after the hit... not before... but whatever happen, Nishikori won that match, fair and square..
Kaspar you have no idea, the call was right before nishikoris backhand. That's how refs are but good for nishikori and at the end he deserves to win
いや最後サービスエースとかバケモンかよ
Congrats Kei!!!!🇯🇵
That was one of the memorable matches ever you did!
You are super cool cos you have already won three full set games in this AO. I know you are tired, but pls make me believe that you can defeat the world no.1 player, Novak Djokovic in QF.
Thank you for such a wonderful match!
All the support from India. You are proud of asia😍
Nishikori is really one of the beast out there. Strong mentality and hardworking as always. Would like to see him to win his first grand slam.
11:13 Carreno Busta's logic: "If the linesman hadn't called it out, I would have teleported back to the ball!"
His logic was to play along the rules. That's all. This is your dumbass reason.
but thats the rule. Even if its a simple shot in the open court, if linesman calls out before the opponent hits the ball, you have to replay. Not sure here whether linesman call came before or after Nishikori hit it
@@darthvader8892 not always Buddy..at certain instances, umpire can make decisions according to his freewill..
@@nikhildehlan6360 The rules leave room for interpretation. The umpire is totally allowed to decide, if a point is going to be replayed or not. It is his decision and in this case it is a 100% correct one. Rules are there to create fairness and thats why the umpire has the right to judge it based on the situation. Busta is a sore loser, it was disgusting to watch.
"The Chair Umpire must decide if the original “out” call
was a hindrance to either player. If it was a hindrance, the point
shall be replayed. If it was not a hindrance, the player who hit the
ball wins the point."
www.atptour.com/en/corporate/rulebook
Nishikori was mid-swing and Pablo was definitely sprinting to the other side BEFORE the call.
There was no hindrance to either player, hence the umpire awarded the point to the player that hit the ball.
I see Nishikori have such a strong mental strength. He never smile or expose his feelings easliy before the match ends. And do not step back at the very important point. Such a warrior. And last but not least, polite.
Chaitrumpire did the right thing. Even the linesman's call was made before the hitting, both players already decided the direction where to hit and where to run. Which means, Nishikori's raquet was already on his swing and Busta's lags are already moving to his direction. Call did not change the outcome even it was made before hit. It is why the umpire give a point to Nishikori.
Federer Roger he smiled when the ball was incorrectly called out, like in his mind he was thinking "lol, here we go".
Lucky for him he's calm and smiling, while his opponent was angry and lost his calm and the match after that. Then swear at umpire while walking off after loss. What a sore loser. Out classed.
定期的にみたくなる笑
中毒性があるわ〜
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
I haven't seen such technical and masterful matches like this for a long time. Both players demonstrated just an ideal performances: Pablo was like a wall and beat off every ball, and Kei played extremely cleverly. Respect for both players!!!!!
Nishikori deserves a grand slam title. Not only this match, for all the past years. Japanese and Asians should be proud of him. Might lack of power and physical stamina, you still could win by your efforts and attitude. GO KEI
漫画のような逆転劇をありがとう
Someone help me translate
@@craig170
That’s mean “Thank you for the cartoon-like reversal”
Regardless of whether the call came after or before the hit, why did the umpire let Carreno Busta challenge if he was going to lose the point either way?
FeatureTennis he can’t say no to that.
FeatureTennis because if the or call was before nishikori hit it, and it was in, then they would have to replay the point. That's what nishikori thought was going to happen. You could see in his reaction. His opponent really thought the call was made before. If you allow it down, it wss almost at the same time. Carreno busta couldn't have won the point any other way but for the replay, that's why he argued so much for it. And it's really ironic because AO officials created the 10 point tie break fur that extra twist at the end and the commentators said it was a shame the extra twist happened at the end!!! In a Normal 7 point tie break carreno busta would have won the match!!!!!!
@@75yellowraven in a normal 7 point tiebreak small mistakes(by officials) like that could matter a bit more than 10 points, and a lot more compared to if there were no tiebreaks.
@@75yellowraven I understand what you're saying, but how can the challenge system hawkeye determine when the out call was made? Doesn't it only show the trajectory of the ball?
@@75yellowraven You got it wrong. It's the player's right to challenge which in turn must be reviewed to determine if the ball was in or out. Once the ball was determined to be in, the Chair Umpire is required to make the judgement whether the linesman call affect the outcome of the play. The umpire made the call that the call did not affect the outcome of the play (i.e. Busta had run the wrong way and was not in position to make a play on the ball independent of the linesman's call). An analogous situation is when a serve is called out but on review seen to be in. The point is sometimes given to the server rather than replayed if the umpire believes the receiver had no play on the ball. That's the rules...
The umpire got it right. The out call CLEARLY came after Nishikori hit the ball, and it was a clean winner while Carreno Busta was racing to the other side of the court. It would’ve been insane to take that point away from Nishikori.
It was the right decision overall but against the rules. The umpire really messed up by allowing Busta to challenge. Still, we all make mistakes although that's probably no consolation to Busta right now
no. call was in error while point still very much active. replay only fair solution
@@iainstewart2102 Correct. It's like a serve that was called out and a return winner (out of reach) after the call. In that situation you have to replay the point...
@@guillezorro Busta has the ability to challenge no matter what.
Eric Bowman C.B. has no argument because he was nowhere near the ball to make a play.
5時間の試合でこのクオリティは鬼
You gotta love Nishikori for being so calm in tough situations and no reactions at all ❤️💯
What an insane match! Could have gone either way but just incredible how Kei stuck with it and willed himself through during the 5th set tiebreaker. This win is massive for Kei's confidence.
Greatest tennis player ever from Asia
13:37
ここ、錦織急にテンポ悪なってどうしたんや、と思ったら相手に打たせてカウンター狙っとんねんな。マジでえげつないわ天才。
hase dygo 思った。ビッグ4が得意なプレーだわ。
13:55
このバックハンドで自分も思った
それをこの場面でやれることもすごいし、その選択もなかなかできない…
これで流れも変わったし恐るべし錦織
さすがファイナルセット勝率歴代１位の錦織
誰もが終わったと思ってたが逆転で勝利を掴んだのは痺れた
この試合テレビで見てたけど今でも忘れられないな
Kei is the MAN!!!!
I insist on this is the most Dramatic & Best match
in 2019.
This was the first time I cried in sports.
I will never forget this match.
Nishikori fan here! Ups from Illinois!
Illinois? Where’s that?
Legendary match.
The pride in Chang eyes at the end is magical.
Well done Nishikori. His concentration was just superb.
Despite what some people are saying the rule is not that the point HAS to be replayed no matter what. It is only to be replayed when the out call affects the outcome of the point. The call and the backhand were simultaneous. The call wasn't before the hit at all. And Carreno Busta was clearly running to the other side before the call. At that point it should be up to the Umpire's discretion and the Umpire made the fairest decision (Nishikori's point) all by the book.
I respect all the arguments that support the umpire. I was a umpire myself and i would say it was a mistake not to replay the point. And I tell you why. Imagine Nishikori misses the backhand. Don`t you think he would have complained that he was hindered by that outcall? Of course he would and that is the reason why the point should be replayed. It would be the fair decision even it would be extremely unlucky for Nishikori.
@@jochenknobel8175 No silly. In that scenario, if Nishikori misses the backhand then he would just challenge the call for a replay. Umpire absolutely made the right decision.
thank you for uploading this video
Nishikori definately deserve this grand slam
15:55のマイケル チャンがこの試合の凄まじさを物語ってる
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
5時間うんこ我慢してた説
コロナでテニスの試合見られなくて気が滅入ったので久しぶりに見に来た
やっぱこの逆転劇は凄すぎる…
11:13 Nishikori hits the ball one tenth of a second before the linesman calls out. But Busta was already out of the point and was not affected in any way shape of form by the linesman call. So he needs to get his honesty and decency checked. If he was 100% honest and fair about it he would have accepted the umpire's call as natural and probably would have won the match. His will to win got in the way of his sportsmanship. He is still young and he can learn. Hope he does.
But that's not how the rules work I'm afraid bro
@@janveraart307 Can you tell me what the rules say? I am not too keen of these type of rules in tennis. Can you tell me the specifics on the rules?
@@janveraart307 How does the rule work? "Bro"
@@janveraart307 That's exactly how the rules work
@Dennis J. Jansen Thank you ever so much! but to be fair the rule just states the obvious don't you think? I mean if the rule was any different it would be doing harm to the sport.
錦織さん半端ねぇよ
すげーよ！
今大会何時間試合してんだよ！
ダブル優勝みてぇなぁ
14時間だっけ？
変更名無し 14時間弱
対するジョコは10時間弱
くっちゃん ジョコはマジで化け物、化け物のナダルに圧勝したし
マキグソ太郎 圧勝ってか、ナダルはそんなに調子は良くなさそうだったけどね……ボールが浅すぎた
例え、ストレートで勝ち上がってても
決勝は本調子にみえなかった
Thank you for this video 🙏
疲れのせいで終わった後のテンションが敗者…
見事でした✨
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
Nishikori is probably exhausted rn. He's played 15 sets now. That's crazy.
今見るとより、泣けてくる😢
日本人の誇りだよ
全アジア人の誇りも
いやーこの時代に巡り合ってよかった！
You live in Japan? How’s live there? Want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
何回みても最後のサービスエース痺れます
My God! My hat's off to, I mean I'm bowing to Nishkori. The beauty of sports, right there. Thank you.
ASIAN PROUD !!!! Congratz KEI
One of the commentators is clearly on Carreno Busta's side. Before the "controversial call," he called one of Nishikori's 2nd serve out. He kept mentioning it until someone had told him that the ball actually caught the back of the line. So I'm not surprised he was adamant about being on Carreno Busta's side when the call was clearly made after the Nishikori hit the ball. Thank goodness the chair umpire was impartial.
he was so biased, amazing attitude.
The umpire was right, Busta moved before the call and Nishikori hit a winner right at the call, Nishikori took the point
Busta himself knew he was gonna loose that point
You are right. But it has nothing to do with the moving of busta or that nishikori will take the point for sure. It depends on when the ball was hit and the call of the line judge. And the call was very short after the ball hit nishikoris racket!
Yes.. carrenabusta was very much greedy I gotta say..coz he was 8-5 at that time.. obviously Nishikori deserved that point.. carrenabusta was way far from the ball.. Really liked the way Nishikori kept his nerves..😎😏
Busta was stolen the match
@@Robin-ju3wc busta wouldn't have been able to save it. But, there are rules.
@@howensung6968 he is a cheat
これがフルセットの勝率
歴代１位の実力か!!?
amazing(ﾉﾟДﾟ)ﾉ
This match was like a movie.
I am very proud of you Kei!! (from Japan)
最後勝ち方かっこよすぎでしょ…
サーブが苦手な錦織がここぞでは結構良いサーブ使える錦織が最後締めがアニメだった。
@@誠伊藤-c5w Google翻訳かな？
確かにこの試合の錦織はアニメの主人公のようだったね
Hoping for Kei and Naomi take the slam trophy
Zandhata 2 Naomi-70%,Kei-25%))
Very Japanese.
@@alimahmudov791 Naomi 25%, Kei 5%
Ain't happening for Kei. He's going to be either too tired or just choke against Djokovic.
@@ChrisM-vz4pe how many times did Kei win against Djokovic?
Difference between a good player and amazing player. Mentality
SweetAsHoney dafuq are you talking about
よく粘った！準々決勝も持ち前の粘り強さで頑張って！応援してます！
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
If you slow down the video the call was right after Nishikori hit the ball, the ball was above the net coming back to Pablo when the call was made.
The call is after the hit slow down to 0.25 and you will hear the call after the shot so point for Nishikori
The Japanese proves an incredible mental strength.
Scott Harry don’t u mean kei? Btw my names ken😂
Carreño was out of control. He had no chance winning that point. By the way, I never saw Chang that emotional.
圭おめでとう！！！次も期待してます
ゆっくり休んでね
k k is definitely right Carreno Busta was running to the opposite side where Nishikori hit it
yep and he started running even before the call was made . so the call didn't affect his gameplay
Yes but according to the rules after a bad call they have to replay the point regardless of the outcome.
@@Fanthomas1742 no , umpire is correct, if you should check it out.
@@akas224 To be honest there is no correct call. Either way its bad for the opponent. The linejudge fucked it up.
@@Fanthomas1742 you don't know miss judge doesn't always be replayed??? Case by case. You don't know about tennis at all. I think you just
wanted PBC to win this match.
Awesome Nishikori👏👏👏
The rule says that the point should only be replayed if the wrong call impeded the players' game during the time the wrong call was made.
For example, if an official calls out and you stop and don't hit the ball but it was clearly within your striking distance, then your opponent challenges the call and it shows that the ball was in, the point will be replayed.
However, if a wrong call is made but a player is in no position to hit the ball back to your opponent's court, then the point goes to the other player. No replays.
The problem is: the notion of whether or not a player were able to hit the ball back to continue play is purely subjective and the judgment lies under the umpire's discretion.
In this particular case, it is as clear as day and night that Carreno Busta was in no position at all to be hindered by the call nor to continue play because he was so far away from the ball after the wrong call was made. The umpire made the right decision.
Totally agree! Similar rule prevails in the NFL if pass is uncatchable, no pass interference is called. Those commentators that made fuss about the umpires (correct) call are just like Shakespeare's "empty vessels"!
read the rule below .
Nishikori was so calm and composed in the last points
最終セット強いって言うけど、5ー8になった時はさすがに諦めてた。
あそこから5連続ポイントするなんてスゴすぎです。
a 6500 7ー8の押されてたのに形成逆転のカウンターは声出たわ。
明らかになんか相手に打たせてる感あったからなんでだろうと思ったらカウンターが来て♪ヽ(´▽｀)/
心臓バクバクだった〜
こんな試合何度も見たいけど何度も経験してたらいつか死んじまうよ…
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
この試合めっちゃ好き
チャンコーチが感動してはる
試合の途中でも、ちょっと涙ぐんでいらっしゃる場面も見ました
チャンコーチの良いお父さん感
りーすけ こんな素晴らしい試合そりゃ感動するべ
めちゃめちゃ熱い人だからな
修造並みに
素人教える時すら本気だったよ
You live in Japan? How’s life there? I want to visit, looks like an awesome place to be.
Totally agree with the ref. The ref may be exaggerating the explanation a little to explain it, but if you break it down, Nishikori has already swung, and just about hits the ball, when the "out" call is made. A professional player can not wait and react to a shot from Nishikori, as he is too close to the net, they have to guess and just choose to run one way or the other. And this is exactly what Carreno-Busta does...on Nishikori's backswing, he has chosen, and starts legging it to the right. It is obvious, if an "out" call had or had not been made, he would still already have been running that way anyway. It is a shame that Carreno-Busta did not just accept this, let it go and move on to the next point, he may have won. He allowed the fiery Latin character to come out.
THE CLIP SURGEON True this damn Latin Character kill our possibilities many times.
that's not how the rules work
It's the eternal debate between common sense and the strict rules. Personally I believe in common sense (and thus this decision), but if you believe in strict application of the rules (which is totally fair as well) then this was the wrong decision@@janveraart307
The emotions got the best of him he lost the final set.
@@exzobree9158 but Nishikori looked confident , he won anyway.
14:37 このポイントミスらせるのが最高に上手い。
Kei must meditate for hours every day to stay that calm while Pablo is shouting 😂😂
The late call was made right around the time Kei was hitting the ball, it's hard to tell whether it's right before or after he made contact. But I feel that it is irrelevant here, because the late call was about the shot that PCB made on Kei's side, not Kei's shot on PCB's side. Kei needed to touch the ball and make the shot (which he did) to make sure a replay was granted just in case the call was overruled by Hawkeye (which it was). After that PCB did not have to do anything to earn a replay. He can be standing on the moon and there should still be a replay. So I think the umpire did make a mistake. But Kudos to both fighters for such an amazing match!
the umpire made the right call … he was already in the motion of hitting the ball before the linesman called out … Carreno Busta was already at the other side of the court even when Nishikori was about to hit the ball down the line … so what's the fuss all about?
That's not how the rules work
Dennis J. Jansen Exactly right, so the umpire was right, the bad call didn't change the outcome for either player, so C.B. shouldn't have been rewarded with a replay.
@Dennis J. Jansen Thanks for enlightening me about the rule. I've been asking about it. Nishikori deserves to win. The Spaniard, who we'll not mention the name, should learn from his mistakes.
@@janveraart307 what makes you believe you know rules better than umpires?
I absolutely agree with you, the only thing I do not understand is why the umpire allowed the challenge if finally he gives the point to Kei anyways.
鳥肌がたちました！ありがとう錦織圭選手
ライブで見れなかったから公式で見れるのはすっごくうれしい！
ずっと見てた！
2セット目まで体調心配なくらいだったけど、流石です。タイブレークの鬼、フルセットの神ですね
if you go to 10:15 and slow it down to 0.25 speed, you will hear the out call is made just after Nishikori hits the ball
I agree with the umpire. CB had no play on the ball whatsoever, so had the correct call been made it was Nishikori's point. CB tried to get rewarded for the linesperson's mistake when he'd clearly lost the point. To me Nishikori was already swinging when the out call came.
Love Kei! And 15:00 that coach there beside Chang is *so perfect* as a tennis coach!! Look at him telling Kei just what he needs in this moment when everyone in the arena is going nuts: STAY CALM.
I would like kei to win AO he really deserve one slam
スーパータイブレーク方式はこのために採用されたと言っても過言ではない