new subscriber! Awesome recovery job, impressed with the night work. Confused how a truck with that weight could even consider crossing that bridge, the most bizarre thing I've seen today.
It looks like this accident was based on the theory that "if I drive fast enough, nature will not have time to discover that my vehicle weighs 55 tons, and thus I'll clear the bridge before anything happens to it...." You can see this phenomenon on Tom & Jerry cartoons. Maybe the truck driver watches a lot of those.
sebofo We had many years go same stuff in our Village. Wooden bridge, heavy truck with trailer loaded with cement blocks. Driver crawled over bridhe in slowest gear with steady throttle. Bridge was crying and shaking. But than he thought he is safe and he shifted into second gear onle meter before driving axle was on firm land again. That blown the planks apart and trailer felt into river, dragged truck back into watter to. It was middle day.
According to newspaper reports, the driver had been following his GPS, he did see the sign but floored it, hoping to make it across the bridge. He has been charged with reckless driving.
Hello Boss, sorry but I've broken my mirror. Unfortunately the cab got dented as well. How bad is it? Not sure, it's still in the river at the moment!! Glad he was ok, though.
I dropped my new motorbike yesterday and I'm watching some of these to make myself feel a bit better. I was stuck underneath the bike by my boot and couldn't get up or move the bike. Had to lie there and wait for a passing motorist to rescue me. Much cheaper 👍
Transporting a heavy load in a large truck at night on local roads requires planning, which this driver apparently did not do. Perhaps he relied on his GPS to find the way, and we've all had issues with that method! Modern mapping provides all the data we need, but it can also lead us far astray.
There are really clear signs, and if he didn't see them he really shouldn't drive a truck. It's a narrow wooden pontoon bridge and he should've realized he was to heavy just by looking at it.
SO MUCH PULLING POWER! Must be some nice cables since they arent as big as Id have expected and still hold up. But maybe its just the smooth steady pulling with no shock loads?
60 ton truck on 4 ton max bridge. Thats over 10 times the max weight. What the hell was the driver thinking! You can tell just by looking at the bridge that it would never support 60 tons. 5 tons maybe but never 60.
cibie01 Goes to show people who think trucks are magically safe and indestructible just because they are big and heavy. How not true at all. In any way.
FishplateFilms Floating bridges used to be common. This one is (was) the last one open for vehicle traffic. At 4 tons maximum capacity it started to feel a bit wobbly driving a car across it. The water it crosses is the river "Österdalälven"; the water-level varies quite a bit. As shown in the video the water is at its lowest level which makes the final section onto land a bit steep.
I don't mind if you give me the truck. I will fix it up. Like most have already said, he almost made it too. Good job on the recovery, got love the recovery vehicles defiantly built for the job. Lucky being a left hand drive truck might have been a different outcome otherwise.
Presumably the driver was prosecuted as it wasn’t an accident but a case of ignoring the sign? Also did he or his company/insurance have to pay for a new bridge?
Falck is a Danish Famely owned Compeny for almost 100 year's it is 108 year's old, back in year 1906 the Dane Sophus Falck did start the Famely Compeny Falck, to'day 108 years later Falck is one of the biggest recovery compeny in the world they are 38.000 workers in 46 Contry's Falck have more then 8000 Trucks and car's and Ambulancer are fire truck's, more then 8000,,that is alot,
+The Bushwacker for sure not ..but he is talking about recovery operation.. only 60k for new truck and 20k for trailer at maximum .. now for the bridge ididnt know that Trucka recocery companies build bridges too!!
@@qusaisaher I really hope you're kidding. A new truck like that (if it's not used) costs around 1 mil SEK (100k Euros) from the factory without the tanks, stock paint and without bumper bar and extra lights. Not sure about how much a trailer costs but I know an asphalt tub costs around 150k SEK (15k Euros) so I'd guess quadruple that and you get yourself a new trailer with all the equipment you need.
The authorities don't put 4 Ton Max signs up to stop 60 Ton trucks crossing the bridge just to piss you off. there is a good reason for the sign to be there.... mate
Robert Becker The proper bridge is about 5km downstream. The distance saved would've been less than 5km though, and the winding back roads means he was losing time anyway.
Here is a map, www.google.se/maps/@60.5874523,15.0708235,14z , it's zoomed in on the floating bridge. He was coming from the south-west when the GPS told him to get off the E16 too early.
+Robert Becker The bridge is either suitable or not, and if it is not, the length of the detour is completely irrelevant. There may not even be a detour available.
In theory you are absoluty right, but ik you can't waste time, you might take some strange decisions, like a bridge should take a little overload once, only for you...
There are some truck drivers who are true criminals. They don't give a shit about signs and traffic laws. Then, when the shit hit the fan, the tendency is always to blame the employer for stressing them with delivery terms.
Såvitt jag hört var det träpellets i lasten, om det var full vikt vet jag däremot inte, kan ju lossat något ställe innan ... Hur har det gått med bron ? rep påbörjat ? Hur har det gått med lastbilen/släpet ?
Fniss...jag drog över en bro med max vikt 4 ton. En trä bro och när jag kom fram till gården och skulle lossa fullt lass stallströ så kom bonnen och undrade hur fan jag kommit dit och de va inte ens där jag skulle lossa utan hos grannen så jag dönade över bron igen och hamnade till sist på rätt ställe.
Addictive_LiquoriCe I´d say at least €120 000 for the truck and € 100 000 for the trailer. The insurance compensation ought to be quite low, so it is going to cost the Company quite a lot of money. I wonder how the driver argued with himself before entering the bridge; Hmm, the bridge is OK for 4 tons, and my truck wheighs in at 40 tons... If I put the pedal to the metall, maybe I can fly across here!Good thing it is self-regulation on idiots...
in my opinion it can be all cost to half a million euros, only truck destroyed it's 100 thousand euros+trailer, the goods are not accepted (I don't know what was in inside) maybe it was worth thousand euros maybe one hundred thousand euros) neutralization product (do not know the cost), the work of the four truck tug and many hours of work a few people, the destruction of the bridge, alll cost is very much
***** It was loaded with fuel pellets, and it was dellivered to the customer and accepted. Bridgerepair is going on right now, so the residents has a longer way to travel to get across.
+D Loui How many times do we Europeans have to repeat to people like you that ALL motor vehicles in Europe are insured as a matter of law? The insurance company has no choice in the matter - the bridge is definitely covered, and it depends on the driver's policy (third-party or all risks) whether or not the truck damage is covered.
Could have been a whole lot worse. This happened on a floating bridge which sustained minimal damage and no lives were at risk, apart from minimal risk to the driver. Just imagine if this had happened on a conventional bridge, crossing another road or a railway line. The company was no doubt fully insured as required by law, so it is unlikely they went out of business. They may experience some overloading on next year's premium, though.
1: The driver was near death, a thick pole that hold the bridge in place was 1dm from his stomack and could sink in to the 22m river, he also got physical damage. 2: It was a one man company, so he had to pay ~300 000€
+Frulck -- I am relying on information from the owner of this channel, ADVideofilm. In the very top post they say that the driver was not hurt in the accident, so for you to say that he was "near death" and "he also got physical damage" does not ring true. I have looked up a number of other reports and they all say that the driver was not injured.Your statement that the driver "was a one man company, so he had to pay €300.000" is nonsense. It does not matter if the driver is an owner-operator or if he works for a multi-national because ALL motor vehicles in Sweden must carry insurance. However, it is possible that the insurance company claimed it back from him because this was NOT an accident. It is reported in several places that the driver knew that the bridge would not carry him and made the attempt anyway, and at full speed. In those circumstances (a deliberate and monumentally-stupid act) the insurers must still pay for the damage but they can reclaim from the driver.
ADVideofilm En liten fundering. Vad händer med lasten? Tas den tillvara på eller går allt till spillo? Hur stor ekonomisk smäll är detta för transportfirman? :)
Sad event but I don't think the truck could have been carrying 60 tons - what is the national weight limit in Sweden? Also as the truck was "floating on its tank", that means the tank was pretty well empty, otherwise it would have sunk to the bottom...
AAAyyyGGG It was fully loaded with pellets. A lot of air in between. And the weight limit is 64 tons here in Sweden now. 60 Before 1st June. It was in the news this and all the facts was there. Plus I've been hauling cargo for ten plus years now. I have no doubt it was fully loaded.
@@snakecold6755 In many cases I would agree with your point but not here. To drive a 60 ton truck you need a license, and thus you know better than to cross a bridge that is not rated for your vehicle, just as you know your truck's height and know to look for the height restriction for any bridge you go under. This crash was inexcusable.
Being from Calif, I really enjoy watching your videos. Thank you very much.
new subscriber!
Awesome recovery job, impressed with the night work.
Confused how a truck with that weight could even consider crossing that bridge, the most bizarre thing I've seen today.
It looks like this accident was based on the theory that "if I drive fast enough, nature will not have time to discover that my vehicle weighs 55 tons, and thus I'll clear the bridge before anything happens to it...."
You can see this phenomenon on Tom & Jerry cartoons. Maybe the truck driver watches a lot of those.
sebofo We had many years go same stuff in our Village. Wooden bridge, heavy truck with trailer loaded with cement blocks. Driver crawled over bridhe in slowest gear with steady throttle. Bridge was crying and shaking. But than he thought he is safe and he shifted into second gear onle meter before driving axle was on firm land again. That blown the planks apart and trailer felt into river, dragged truck back into watter to. It was middle day.
sebofo or alternatively the theory that it was dark, unfamiliar with area, following a satnav, didn't see sign.
According to newspaper reports, the driver had been following his GPS, he did see the sign but floored it, hoping to make it across the bridge. He has been charged with reckless driving.
@@sebofo next time he shouldnt use google maps when driving a truck
That was the Jeremy Clarkson theory "Speed and Power"
Hello Boss, sorry but I've broken my mirror. Unfortunately the cab got dented as well.
How bad is it? Not sure, it's still in the river at the moment!!
Glad he was ok, though.
David Marker Snr. It was the boss him self driving 😬🙄😱
@@mikaellillnockebohannon How much would a tow job like that cost in Sweden?
I love the dual front turning axles in some of those rigs.
4 T = four times.
He just went once,this sign is a lie.
Excellent video and great recovery job, well done.
0:14 "Falck!" I bet that's what the driver said as the bridge collapsed under him.
Jim Norris qw
the driver said kurwa :-)
mobb figga The driver was not hurt at the accident.
ADVideofilm The driver must have been hurt in his/her head BEFORE he/she attempted this idiotic crossing...
ADVideofilm seems impossible :) lucky strike
ADVideofilm One wonders if the driver and/or his company will have to pay damages.
Harry Andruschak Definitely. Would have cost the company he/she worked for a fortune. Also, the truck driver would have lost their license.
+ADVideofilm Driver suck's!!
Its great to see how well this team works as one...
These videos are oddly fascinating. Thanks so much for the effort to produce and share them.
I dropped my new motorbike yesterday and I'm watching some of these to make myself feel a bit better.
I was stuck underneath the bike by my boot and couldn't get up or move the bike. Had to lie there and wait for a passing motorist to rescue me.
Much cheaper 👍
Liked to have seen a video of this truck trying to cross a 4 ton bridge
Transporting a heavy load in a large truck at night on local roads requires planning, which this driver apparently did not do. Perhaps he relied on his GPS to find the way, and we've all had issues with that method! Modern mapping provides all the data we need, but it can also lead us far astray.
There are really clear signs, and if he didn't see them he really shouldn't drive a truck. It's a narrow wooden pontoon bridge and he should've realized he was to heavy just by looking at it.
Bra film förresten! Tack!
sebofo Tack!
SO MUCH PULLING POWER! Must be some nice cables since they arent as big as Id have expected and still hold up. But maybe its just the smooth steady pulling with no shock loads?
Excellent video
***** Thanks!
Riktigt bra jobbat och det är riktigt intressant att följa er kanal fortsätt så!!!
I see the lorry put it mooring light on as it came to the bank
Vem körde lastbilen?
How strong are each of those wreckers? Thats a lot weight to pull through the mud. Props to the operators for a good job!
Usually at least 100 tons per main winch line, double with a pulley/snatch block. usually 30 tons+ on the secondary lines.
Ännu en sevärd film från dig. Tack 😄
Andreas Fjällman Tack själv!
Ja mycket bra film på en mycket tokig händelse
bm1113 Tack! Det gick lite snett s.a.s.
Big big job big money job proper setup 👍
Good video of an interesting recovery!
Nice tow trucks. Greeting from USA.
60 ton truck on 4 ton max bridge. Thats over 10 times the max weight. What the hell was the driver thinking! You can tell just by looking at the bridge that it would never support 60 tons. 5 tons maybe but never 60.
Bra film, snyggt jobbat 👍👍
Tobbe Hallman Tack!
Thank god that was a left hand drive or things could have been drastic.
excellent video yet again.
cibie01 Thanks!
cibie01 Goes to show people who think trucks are magically safe and indestructible just because they are big and heavy. How not true at all. In any way.
Clean work
NEW VIDEO
Can't help but wonder what was in the tanks? Saw no mention of it or I might just have missed it.
He was carrying close to 40'000kg of wood pellet fuel.
Nice work ! Is that a floating bridge? It was fortunate to have a "ramp" on the lakes edge to aid in the recovery!
Gregg.
FishplateFilms Yes, floating bridge :)
ADVideofilm Ok , thanks!
FishplateFilms Floating bridges used to be common. This one is (was) the last one open for vehicle traffic.
At 4 tons maximum capacity it started to feel a bit wobbly driving a car across it.
The water it crosses is the river "Österdalälven"; the water-level varies quite a bit. As shown in the video the water is at its lowest level which makes the final section onto land a bit steep.
Rallarbusen Very interesting, thank you for the info! It would of been a rough ride!!
Cheers Gregg
I don't mind if you give me the truck. I will fix it up.
Like most have already said, he almost made it too.
Good job on the recovery, got love the recovery vehicles defiantly built for the job.
Lucky being a left hand drive truck might have been a different outcome otherwise.
Had he almost made it across the bridge when it broke?
Good and interesting video, thanks for uploading it.
Scooby Thanks for watching!
1:18 Good. The truck is alive.
Presumably the driver was prosecuted as it wasn’t an accident but a case of ignoring the sign? Also did he or his company/insurance have to pay for a new bridge?
"A 60 ton truck tried to cross the bridge" Nice try, but it was the stupid driver who tried! Well produced video - kudos!
great video!
Evandro C.B. Thanks!
Falck is a Danish Famely owned Compeny for almost 100 year's it is 108 year's old, back in year 1906 the Dane Sophus Falck did start the Famely Compeny Falck, to'day 108 years later Falck is one of the biggest recovery compeny in the world they are 38.000 workers in 46 Contry's Falck have more then 8000 Trucks and car's and Ambulancer are fire truck's, more then 8000,,that is alot,
nice work and super trucks
What was the total cost of the whole operation inclinding the repair costs? And what was the estimated value of the truck undamaged?
800k for what ?!
you can buy new truck with it and new trailer
+The Bushwacker for sure not ..but he is talking about recovery operation.. only 60k for new truck and 20k for trailer at maximum ..
now for the bridge ididnt know that Trucka recocery companies build bridges too!!
@@qusaisaher I really hope you're kidding. A new truck like that (if it's not used) costs around 1 mil SEK (100k Euros) from the factory without the tanks, stock paint and without bumper bar and extra lights. Not sure about how much a trailer costs but I know an asphalt tub costs around 150k SEK (15k Euros) so I'd guess quadruple that and you get yourself a new trailer with all the equipment you need.
The authorities don't put 4 Ton Max signs up to stop 60 Ton trucks crossing the bridge just to piss you off. there is a good reason for the sign to be there.... mate
Great video!
jix177 Thanks!
Driver and the company he works for should be held fully responsible for repairs/replacement of the bridge
Ajdå, där blev det tokigt!
En av de viktigaste skyltarna att ha full koll på. Tillsammans med C17 Begränsad fordonshöjd.
- Å fan!
good recovery guys well done
Nice video, my question is: what would have been the distance to drive around and cross the river by a proper bridge
Robert Becker The proper bridge is about 5km downstream. The distance saved would've been less than 5km though, and the winding back roads means he was losing time anyway.
Here is a map, www.google.se/maps/@60.5874523,15.0708235,14z , it's zoomed in on the floating bridge. He was coming from the south-west when the GPS told him to get off the E16 too early.
Rallarbusen Thanks, little shame than...but a good teaching case in our company from now...
+Robert Becker The bridge is either suitable or not, and if it is not, the length of the detour is completely irrelevant. There may not even be a detour available.
In theory you are absoluty right, but ik you can't waste time, you might take some strange decisions, like a bridge should take a little overload once, only for you...
Täcker försäkringen detta?
Professionals are so successful
Looks like a $50k recovery, truck & wagon totaled, + bridge repair. Poor decision probably cost $350k US.
Omg, what was the driver thinking about? :)))
btw is he ok?
En dunder tabbe. Det snackades nog en del på åkeriet efteråt. Fick föraren tillbaka körkortet eller tog han ett nytt?
Nice job guys. Love the American made wrecker with the Swedish chasis. At least it looks like Miller made wrecker equipment.
Nah we need tougher stuff over here since our trucks load about the double compared to yours.
There are some truck drivers who are true criminals.
They don't give a shit about signs and traffic laws.
Then, when the shit hit the fan, the tendency is always to blame the employer for stressing them with delivery terms.
If you think about it, not even a bush elephant could cross that bridge. The normal size male is 6 tons.
good thing it's a volvo. nice video btw
Alcyorr Zone Thanks!
ADVideofilm no probs mate
I remember watching this in trucking school. I wonder what the driver does now?
He sure ain't driving a big rig anymore, ofc.
Yrkeschaufför?
Wondering how much is charged by the tow company just to answer the phone.
Bra och proffsigt filmat.
Hans Bäckdahl Tack!
Kuinka paljon pitää peruskoulussa olla tunteja? Vai vastuutako taas siirreltiin. EI fysiikkaa , kemiaa, saati kieliä. Förstås?
Trevlig film på större delen av bärgningen!
K-DaK Tack!
good job and video
take care
Såvitt jag hört var det träpellets i lasten, om det var full vikt vet jag däremot inte, kan ju lossat något ställe innan ...
Hur har det gått med bron ? rep påbörjat ?
Hur har det gått med lastbilen/släpet ?
a22roadrunner Bron ska repareras och vara klar före midsommar. Beräknas kosta 3 miljoner.
wonder what the recovery cost
Fniss...jag drog över en bro med max vikt 4 ton. En trä bro och när jag kom fram till gården och skulle lossa fullt lass stallströ så kom bonnen och undrade hur fan jag kommit dit och de va inte ens där jag skulle lossa utan hos grannen så jag dönade över bron igen och hamnade till sist på rätt ställe.
impressive recovery job
What are those tanks holding? Just dry bulk cargo? Never seen a trailer like that...also how the hell did he think he will make that...
That particular truck carried wood pellets, but these kind of tanks are also common for carrying animal feed and grain.
Driver of the Year Award nomination ------------------------ CANCELLED !!!!!
This incident cost many thousands euros.
***** Call your business bank manager on a secure phone.
€100,000+ easy when buying a new truck and trailer with that configuration.
Addictive_LiquoriCe I´d say at least €120 000 for the truck and € 100 000 for the trailer. The insurance compensation ought to be quite low, so it is going to cost the Company quite a lot of money. I wonder how the driver argued with himself before entering the bridge; Hmm, the bridge is OK for 4 tons, and my truck wheighs in at 40 tons... If I put the pedal to the metall, maybe I can fly across here!Good thing it is self-regulation on idiots...
in my opinion it can be all cost to half a million euros, only truck destroyed it's 100 thousand euros+trailer, the goods are not accepted (I don't know what was in inside) maybe it was worth thousand euros maybe one hundred thousand euros) neutralization product (do not know the cost), the work of the four truck tug and many hours of work a few people, the destruction of the bridge, alll cost is very much
***** It was loaded with fuel pellets, and it was dellivered to the customer and accepted. Bridgerepair is going on right now, so the residents has a longer way to travel to get across.
Very good. I wish All a larger bridge :)
How did the diver get out with no Injuries he was very lucky and I am glad he is so lucky
What was the cargo?
just curious if the insurance company is willing to pay both for the truck and the damaged bridge for this kind of accident, .....
+D Loui How many times do we Europeans have to repeat to people like you that ALL motor vehicles in Europe are insured as a matter of law? The insurance company has no choice in the matter - the bridge is definitely covered, and it depends on the driver's policy (third-party or all risks) whether or not the truck damage is covered.
How mutch this operation?
Maybe he thought that the zero must have fallen off the sign; no-one would make a bridge which can only carry 4 tons!! :-D
Could have been a whole lot worse. This happened on a floating bridge which sustained minimal damage and no lives were at risk, apart from minimal risk to the driver. Just imagine if this had happened on a conventional bridge, crossing another road or a railway line. The company was no doubt fully insured as required by law, so it is unlikely they went out of business. They may experience some overloading on next year's premium, though.
1: The driver was near death, a thick pole that hold the bridge in place was 1dm from his stomack and could sink in to the 22m river, he also got physical damage.
2: It was a one man company, so he had to pay ~300 000€
+Frulck -- I am relying on information from the owner of this channel, ADVideofilm. In the very top post they say that the driver was not hurt in the accident, so for you to say that he was "near death" and "he also got physical damage" does not ring true. I have looked up a number of other reports and they all say that the driver was not injured.Your statement that the driver "was a one man company, so he had to pay €300.000" is nonsense. It does not matter if the driver is an owner-operator or if he works for a multi-national because ALL motor vehicles in Sweden must carry insurance. However, it is possible that the insurance company claimed it back from him because this was NOT an accident. It is reported in several places that the driver knew that the bridge would not carry him and made the attempt anyway, and at full speed. In those circumstances (a deliberate and monumentally-stupid act) the insurers must still pay for the damage but they can reclaim from the driver.
aren't loads of that weight supposed to have a pilot with them?
+SickPrid3 no, 60 tons is a normal load
Bushwacker.....that's a good one.
You..............former joke writer for Jay Leno?
very good job
4 Ton bridge? enough for cars only then?
Up to Large Vans or Light Commercial Vehicles. Mercedes/Freightliner Sprinter, for example.
Oliver Wolters ah ok.. Thanks for your reply ;)
Va det inte ägaren som körde bilen?
is 4 ton the weight of the load ? because just my truck with no trailer is 7.5 ton
4 ton is the max weight for the bridge. truck was grossing 60 tons of which the cargo was close to 40.
The bridge says 4t but he thought in Sweden they always have a room to play with... He thought the difference of 36 tons was the room to play with...
+jirka merunka The driver's maths was as bad as yours.
+fkarno Haha =)
fkarno :)
+fkarno hahaha 👍
+jirka merunka Bridge 4 ton, truck around 60 ton, and you come with 36 ? what with the other 20 ton ?
Ben inanamıyorum şok oldum bu tonajla oraya girmesi şoför hatası
That water looks COLD!
That's was cool I didn't see the truck go in the lake so let's all do it again this time let's get it right actions
4ton bridge??
Var den full lastad? Bra och intressanta klipp!
Simon Johansson Fullt lass med bränslepellets.
ADVideofilm En liten fundering. Vad händer med lasten? Tas den tillvara på eller går allt till spillo? Hur stor ekonomisk smäll är detta för transportfirman? :)
kennysandhoj Jag tror lasten transporterades till den som skulle ha haft den. Hur mycket kalaset kostade vet jag inte.
What was the tanker loaded with?
Mario Muscat Fuel pellets
What was in the truck?
Workmule4ever2day Fuel pellets
ADVideofilm sweet... The spilt diesel is bad enough. Tg its wasn't something toxic.
Det är flera härliga svenska dialekter i bruk i den här video snutten en det brukar vara med en helkväll med SVT.
Excuse me, what does "succued" mean? I've never heard this word before! xD
What was the truck carrying?
+79pejeperro wood pellets for heating
Oh really? I thought the load was something liquid. Thanks!!
Sad event but I don't think the truck could have been carrying 60 tons - what is the national weight limit in Sweden? Also as the truck was "floating on its tank", that means the tank was pretty well empty, otherwise it would have sunk to the bottom...
AAAyyyGGG The truck had full load of fuel pellets
AAAyyyGGG
At the time of this accident the weight limit in Sweden was 60 ton, since June 1st it's 64 ton.
AAAyyyGGG It was fully loaded with pellets. A lot of air in between. And the weight limit is 64 tons here in Sweden now. 60 Before 1st June. It was in the news this and all the facts was there. Plus I've been hauling cargo for ten plus years now. I have no doubt it was fully loaded.
Viking88
OK Thanks for the info, I stand corrected! I should have checked the news stories before commenting! ;-)
Weightlimit is 64tonnes and it was loaded with pellets made of wood for house heating
what trailer have in them ?
mark haynes Fuel pellets
60 Ton?? on 4 ton bridge?,
What was the driver thinking?
+Carter W Hern Why do you think that the driver was thinking?
The driver?
What was is cargo?
Fuel pellets
Was the driver blind, or stupid, or both?
epj900 All three: Blind, stupid and both.
epj900 Dunno but I bet he's now got a P45.
ARE YOU PERFECT PEOPLE? BUDDHA? JESUS? MOHAMED? GOD? ANGEL? SUPERMAN?
epj900 qyabzn.mkdgkg
@@snakecold6755 In many cases I would agree with your point but not here. To drive a 60 ton truck you need a license, and thus you know better than to cross a bridge that is not rated for your vehicle, just as you know your truck's height and know to look for the height restriction for any bridge you go under. This crash was inexcusable.