5.56x45 AR15 AMMO Test!...Soft Point vs FMJ!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 апр 2023
  • Testing some soft point and m193 full metal jacket 5.56 ammo. Are these good options for self-defense or hunting? Heavy clothing ballistic gel test using a 16" Palmetto State Armory AR15.
    Join this channel to become a member of The Range Gang:
    / @toolsandtargets
    I am not promoting, nor do I have any affiliation with, any of the retailers or manufacturers shown in this video unless specifically stated otherwise.
    All shooting is performed on a private, closed range on private property under controlled situations. Do not attempt any activities shown in the videos on this channel
    No firearms or ammunition are offered for sale in this video or video description. There are no links provided to sites where firearms or ammunition are available for sale.
    Amazon Affiliate Storefront: www.amazon.com/shop/toolstarg...
    * 35- 50% OFF Axil Affiliate Links!*
    GS Extreme Earbuds bit.ly/3VfRMUH
    Trackr Blu Ear Muffs bit.ly/3HpsR9x
    Trackr Electronic Ear Muffs (Non Bluetooth) bit.ly/3X8DR4y
    15% Off Code For Everything Else On Their Site: TOOLSTARGETS
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 640

  • @A_Brit
    @A_Brit Год назад +130

    I prefer the clothing test. I really don't think it'll matter with rifle rounds, but if it did I'd want to know immediately.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +8

      😎👍

    • @mrwayne5158
      @mrwayne5158 Год назад +13

      You dont have to worry about clothing, there are no average layers of clothes that can stop or deform a 5.56 55 grain bullet traveling at 3100fps.

    • @coltenswindle3827
      @coltenswindle3827 Год назад +4

      Might as well keep the consistency. That’s why we love this channel so much anyways

    • @phild9813
      @phild9813 11 месяцев назад +4

      There are lots of bare gel tests out there. I like adding the clothing for a different element.

    • @kdaltex
      @kdaltex 9 месяцев назад

      You shoot a perp with anything it'll hurt them and make them run or stop.

  • @bobgaylord8883
    @bobgaylord8883 Год назад +86

    I really like the clothing barriers. I think it simulates "real life" projectile performance more accurately, unless, of course, you're defending yourself in a nudist camp........

    • @joejohnson4183
      @joejohnson4183 Год назад +8

      A more accurate clothing barrier would be to replace the denim with t-shirt material and a hoodie .

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +17

      You gotta watch them naked ones. They're slippery!

    • @TheTruth-sd8ey
      @TheTruth-sd8ey Год назад +1

      I agree. What i would also like to see is the "huge winter bad guy" scenatio test. A 10% calibrated gel with layers of winter clothing to simulate a huge 300 lbs attacker wearing thick winter clothing. That'd be interesting to see the penetration of common 5.56 defense loads.

    • @thatsmytwocents4372
      @thatsmytwocents4372 Год назад +1

      @@TheTruth-sd8ey Never seen any clothing .556 didn’t fly right thru. Usually tumbles and fragments,so it doesn’t need to be anything special. Tools, can you weigh in here ???

  • @davidjernigan7576
    @davidjernigan7576 Год назад +22

    I have a feeling those 5.56 don't care about your heavy clothing barrier, or your feelings.

  • @largelarry2126
    @largelarry2126 Год назад +58

    I'm impressed with both of them The FMJ works much better than you would think for entry level ammo. You need to be doing a lot more testing on 223/5.56. You produce a lot of good data for a hillbilly in a fancy hat.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +19

      Thank you sir. I've got quite a few different 5.56/.223 rounds to test.😎👍

    • @johnpoole8321
      @johnpoole8321 Год назад +4

      @@ToolsandTargets Rock on brother!

    • @CharacterMatterz
      @CharacterMatterz Год назад +8

      I do like that hat....

    • @carsonhunt4642
      @carsonhunt4642 11 месяцев назад +5

      This is precisely why most people say round type does not matter for 5.56. All ammo variants are “self defense” lol.
      (Only one that matters is penetrators if need that).

  • @mdbrowne9115
    @mdbrowne9115 Год назад +27

    Thank you for testing those soft points. I have 300 on the way but they have not arrived yet. That expansion was great. Should be a great Coyote and self defense round.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +2

      Nice. I bought quite a few of em myself.😎👍

  • @Sherman62
    @Sherman62 29 дней назад +1

    Good call. I too prefer to stick with soft points for self-defense. A couple of notable points: The velocity of the rounds is, at most, under 3000 fps. Velocity and energy are well under the frequently claimed numbers of 3200 fps and 1200 ft/lb energy.
    The FMJs yaw LATE as they are known to do and this only gets worse as the range increases and velocity drops. They also deviate from the intended path which is not ideal.
    Engineered expanding bullets perform more consistently, which is why they are preferred for hunting. The advantage for self-defense is similar. My preferred load is the Hornady 55gr flat base SP loaded to about the same velocity from a 16" bbl as your test SPs. This is a high .223 level load. The brass, and I'm sure the rifle, are much less abused by this load than full power 5.56 loads. The results are the perfect amount of penetration by my reckoning and excellent consistency of performance.

  • @rob6850
    @rob6850 Год назад +90

    Dude, you rock! These have been on clearance on PSA, and no one else has a test on them.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +19

      Yeah, I bought a ton of em.😎👊

    • @colewarweg8594
      @colewarweg8594 Год назад +18

      Another great test! You should do the AAC 75g BTHP and see how that compares in the gel to those soft points. Interested to see how a soft point compares to that Hornady HP projectile

    • @Lexicologist1971
      @Lexicologist1971 Год назад +1

      We have mountains of them at our store. I may yet get some when I'm not snagging 308 Critical Defense rounds.

    • @mikeyoung4231
      @mikeyoung4231 8 месяцев назад

      Buy all sp
      Load only sp

  • @richardholcomb2878
    @richardholcomb2878 Год назад +13

    It's nice to see a review of 5.56 without someone trying to sell ya something. And from a 16" barrel, too.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +3

      I gotta start doing some more rifle stuff.😎👍

  • @Dwayne7834
    @Dwayne7834 Год назад +13

    I would prefer the soft point over the FMJ . Especially for self defense or hunting. Thanks for the gel test.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Agreed.😎👍

    • @kevinroberts781
      @kevinroberts781 Год назад +1

      I'd rather have a round that spins like crazy in the subject and dumps it's load where I put it. We need to make this a self defense round.

  • @kirkmooneyham
    @kirkmooneyham Год назад +9

    I remember seeing detail drawings from the Dr. Fackler "Wound Ballistics Institute" (probably not the correct name) testing way, way back. Those tracks in your blocks looked just like the detail drawings that were made from their testing. That tells me that your testing is valid, and that even after all these years, the characteristics of 5.56x45mm ammo really haven't changed. It's a known quantity which is a good thing. Great work, your channel is the best for ammo tests.

  • @ratroute8238
    @ratroute8238 Год назад +13

    I always thought soft point would be more reliable out of shorter barrels and it is nice to see such good expansion.
    Thanks for the test!

  • @steelpunisher6944
    @steelpunisher6944 Год назад +41

    Nice! Both were impressive for sure. I’m right there with you. If I could only have one rifle it would be an AR in 5.56. Like you said jack of all trades. I do love my other calibers in the platform but good ole 556 just gets it done. I love these rifle tests. I’d keep the cloth imho. 👍🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @billdubois56
      @billdubois56 Год назад +1

      Another great jelly test Brotha .. an AR is next in line , after I pay off my 692 Tracker ..

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      Appreciate ya, brother!😎👊

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      😎👊

  • @joemorganeatmyshortschannel
    @joemorganeatmyshortschannel Год назад +7

    For my money m193 does job well enough for most applications

  • @homersaypian3798
    @homersaypian3798 Год назад +12

    For the 16” I’d pick the Gold Dot or Federal Fusion. Now for 10.3” I use Hornady Frontier 62gr. soft point. All that being said XM193 is what I’d keep the most of just for general purpose.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +3

      Plenty of good choices for 5.56/.223 for sure.😎👍

  • @johnnyv.223
    @johnnyv.223 Год назад +5

    Lord have mercy on a boy from down in the boondocks 🤠👍
    Great comparison as always, Tools. I'd be hard-pressed to find a name as cool as "Dog-faced pony-soldier" for one of my rigs that survived the awful boating accident. 😢 Thanks for this one!

  • @keithtate1241
    @keithtate1241 Год назад +8

    They both look like they would get the job done but I like the soft point because of the unpredictability of the FMJ. Thanks for the video and have a great evening 😊.

  • @markthe2nd741
    @markthe2nd741 Год назад +3

    I like the gel tests with the cloth layers. I also love the AR platform and I even have a few boxes of both kinds of ammo you tested. Really like your AR too!

  • @chriswalsh9989
    @chriswalsh9989 Год назад +15

    Very cool video, and i like the clothing on the block in my opinion. Glad to see a test on those soft points. I would love to see a test on the federal 62 grain fusion round in 5.56 and see what your results are.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +3

      Thank you sir. I'll see what I can dig up.😎👍

    • @paulmoss7940
      @paulmoss7940 Год назад +1

      I can tell you the Fusion rock in a .223 on deer and slay in an '06 on deer and bear.

    • @tylerwill5250
      @tylerwill5250 Год назад +1

      Have we done a 77g open tip/hollow point test yet?

  • @chrisclements460
    @chrisclements460 5 месяцев назад

    Sir, you have perhaps the best ammo reviews that I have seen! Thanks for all the great info.

  • @armorist6570
    @armorist6570 Год назад +2

    Cant wait for more of these rifle tests btw! Thank you for all your hard work, and keep em comin T&T!

  • @chretired
    @chretired Год назад +6

    Another awesome Tools test for ius to enjoy. Stick with the clothing barrier and maybe on some of the rifle test try a hard barrier as well. Results are as I expected. Just proves you don't want to be on the receiving end of any of these rounds. Those FMJ's did exactly what my DI said they'd do. Go in one place and exit somewhere totally unexpected. All the whole doing significant damage along the way.
    You be the man Tools. Really appreciate all your time and effort to turn out these always very useful test.
    Be vigilant and always be safe my friend, I'd rather die on my feet then live on my knees.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Thank you sir. 5.56 is some mean little stuff.

  • @paulfrevert3662
    @paulfrevert3662 Год назад +3

    The AR platform is the cats meow. I have a few in different calibers and like them all

  • @williamclark755
    @williamclark755 Год назад +4

    I picked up a Ruger 556 2022! Great rifle. Excellent video and testing 🦅🇺🇸

    • @TheTruth-sd8ey
      @TheTruth-sd8ey Год назад

      Which model? MPR or HB? I just picked MPR version in 1:8. Great rifle, just don't know the production year.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      The couple of Ruger AR's I have, have been great.😎👍

  • @jamesJohnson-qe4gw
    @jamesJohnson-qe4gw Год назад +2

    seriously this guy is a legend.
    *I had no idea how much work youve put in sir ty for your time

  • @rogerray2545
    @rogerray2545 Год назад +4

    Brother I've been wondering about those solved point 55 6 Very impressive

  • @scarifrougeone7225
    @scarifrougeone7225 Год назад +2

    Great test and commentary. Outstanding test management and control buddy. 5.56mm rules. FRAGTASTIC!! Love the 5.56mm testing as always. I like the rifle rest through the bare gelly. The SP’s are a great round. Anyway, thanks sharing. Outstanding. Be safe. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

  • @choppermike3329
    @choppermike3329 Год назад +2

    Another great day at the range. Thank you sir!😎👍🏻

  • @gort4016
    @gort4016 Год назад +4

    Interesting video T&T. I was surprised that the FMJ didn't penetrate farther, but like you said - they are unpredictable.

  • @miker9043
    @miker9043 Год назад +4

    Another good one Tools ! i am amazed at how much weight the fmj lost! i definitely would use the soft points for hunting and self defense , stuff is devastating ! i like the clothing tests better than bare gel .

  • @danielmacdonald8358
    @danielmacdonald8358 10 месяцев назад

    Great video... I just got a good bit of that Federal soft point stuff nice to know it was a good buy. Thank you for your time making this video

  • @bruceatwell6031
    @bruceatwell6031 Год назад +2

    I appreciate this video. I really love the pistol ammo tests and comparisons, I watch all of them. I was hoping to see an AR 15 ammo comparison too, so thank you.

  • @jedediahsibley3355
    @jedediahsibley3355 Год назад +6

    Another awesome gel test! I prefer the clothing myself. Great content brother!

  • @randyduncan795
    @randyduncan795 Год назад +1

    And the winner for household defense...300BLK! Know anyone with one of those? But if you have at least a 16" tube 5.56 is nice. The FMJ will defeat some armor. Ten percent is a lot. I'd expect more from the SP at the higher velocity. Thanks for the great testing!

  • @gemini740961
    @gemini740961 Год назад

    Thanks Brian really appreciate you getting to this one.

  • @ram218313
    @ram218313 Год назад +1

    both rounds are devastating, as always thanks for sharing your results

  • @trustnot9
    @trustnot9 Год назад +1

    Awesome test, both did really great. I really enjoyed watch this video like i do all of your tests. Thank you.

  • @jimhovater8755
    @jimhovater8755 Год назад +1

    VERY useful information. Thank you.

  • @milehighgimpster
    @milehighgimpster Год назад +1

    Good test. Good information. Thanks as always.

  • @texasrex2222
    @texasrex2222 Год назад +1

    This was pretty neat seeing the different results and a great reminder of how effective this cartridge is for a lot of needs, including self defense! I wouldn't feel underequipped with either round. I bought a bunch of the Winchester Deer Season XP 64gr and the equivalent from Hornady, because the shelves were full of the stuff last time I went. Never can go wrong with a big can of ball, though!

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      Yessir. Most stuff coming out the end of an AR is pretty potent.😎👍

  • @Peter-jo3sc
    @Peter-jo3sc 4 месяца назад

    Just bought some Fed 5.56 55 grn for first time . Your content help me of what to expect. Thanks brother.

  • @DevinAlden
    @DevinAlden Год назад +4

    You should test the winchester 223 64 gr deer season xp sometime. Alwags been curious to see how those so

  • @ronaldbarnes8302
    @ronaldbarnes8302 Год назад +1

    Enjoy the rifle tests Tools! Have some SP’s but my go to is the 193. Thanks for the video!

  • @allenbolen9705
    @allenbolen9705 Год назад +4

    Personally I love the heavy clothing test! Love ❤️ that rifle 😵‍💫🤩 soft point for me unless I’m shootings through barriers.

  • @YellowHammer26
    @YellowHammer26 Год назад +1

    👍👍nice test, I really like the soft points. Have a great day tools

  • @anthonybrown2426
    @anthonybrown2426 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you for this test with clothing. I truly appreciate and enjoy your videos for the information and knowledge gained. Thank you and have a great day

  • @kenworland1865
    @kenworland1865 Год назад +2

    Keep the clothing barrier! Critters and bad guys aren't gel! lol! Nice test my man! 👊👍

  • @CookieMonster_1969
    @CookieMonster_1969 11 месяцев назад

    I picked up a Diamondback DB15 the other day and will be going through your 5.56 testing videos now.👍

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  11 месяцев назад +1

      Nice. I have some more to test soon.😎👊

  • @ScottSmith-jn1jo
    @ScottSmith-jn1jo 11 месяцев назад +1

    I agree: 5.56 with M193 spec 55 grain is my all-purpose SHTF choice.

  • @pewpew9193
    @pewpew9193 Год назад +5

    I've been messing around with a lot of different 5.56/.223 stuff.
    Varmagedon, Hog Hammer, Silver Tip & whatever Hornady calls those super fast 35 grain lead free bullets.
    Still haven't tried any soft points.
    M193 should always be really close to 3k FPS in a 16".
    M193 at good velocity has the same problem as actual full power 5.7x28 in gel.
    It tumbles like crazy, makes a nasty wound cavity, but tumbles out of the block.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      I'm sure this would be 3k at the muzzle.😎👍

  • @ftdefiance1
    @ftdefiance1 Год назад +1

    M193 has a historic past. It's what I buy at every chance.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      It's what I use the most on my range for shooting steel.😎👍

  • @azazelakira12
    @azazelakira12 Год назад

    This was a great test, I am glad you catch the second bullet. The performance on the HP is a great recipe for Self Defense

  • @scottstewart5784
    @scottstewart5784 Год назад +3

    There goes the argument that soft points lose too much weight compared to a tube of toothpaste (FMJ). I bought a sh*t-ton of Federal brown box mil-spec 62 gr soft-points when I found a good price. Wonder if their fragspansion is more controlled?

  • @ctsnider88
    @ctsnider88 Год назад +1

    Surprising results. Great test

  • @williamgaines9784
    @williamgaines9784 Год назад +1

    At that range, NOBODY will be saying "Please sir, may I have another" for either of those.😮
    I would prefer the SP as it starts its damage earlier on, but would not fret if all I had were the 193s.

  • @leroycaudill96
    @leroycaudill96 Год назад

    Thanks for all the testing you do it helps give us information we would like to gather ourselves thanks for the videos.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      Appreciate you always checking them out!😎👍

  • @hoffpbass
    @hoffpbass Год назад +3

    I've been going with Boat Tail Hollow Point rounds recently as they are cheaper than VMax for coyotes. That point collapses and then it tumbles, but FMJ will probably tumble most of the time anyway. But I have some PSP too. I probably use suspected distance to determine which I take in the field.
    Cool video Tools. Appreciate the hard work. Glad you saved an entire gel block on this. Hopefully gave you a chance for another test before going home.

    • @Aenima308
      @Aenima308 Год назад

      You try the Hornady boat tail HP? Icr the grain but they’re great

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Thank you sir. I did get another pretty good rifle test done on the other end.

    • @hoffpbass
      @hoffpbass Год назад +1

      @@Aenima308 not specially. I've just been buying online mostly, and 69gn BTHP seem to be a norm. I don't know of they are Hornady prokectiles or not, but I know the VMax projectiles are from them.

  • @rogerray2545
    @rogerray2545 Год назад +4

    Soft point damn spell check

  • @3gunshooter60
    @3gunshooter60 2 месяца назад

    I agree about the AR15 tools. I might have one or so. I can not confirm or deny. Great ammo test. Thank you sir.

  • @ke3552
    @ke3552 6 месяцев назад

    Keep the barrier & please keep doing the good work for us. Thanks.

  • @380master9
    @380master9 Год назад +3

    Lehigh the fence controlled chaos

  • @robertharing7031
    @robertharing7031 Год назад +1

    Impressive! I like the performance of both rounds

  • @doubled3120
    @doubled3120 5 месяцев назад

    Keep the barrier incorporated in your tests. Soft points are much more consistent and have immediate expansion. On the other hand, FMJ's are too inconsistent. On this test, they were halfway through the block before they started to tumble. If you are using FMJ for self defense, tumbling might not occur before the bullet exists. Can you afford to take the chance? Great test as always.

  • @justpray365
    @justpray365 Год назад

    Good thing you did the test with the clothing barrier. I saw a lot of deer last season wearing fleece, denim, and at least 2 T-shirts. Of course most of the bad guys still wear hoodies.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      I usually check outside to see what the deer are wearing so I know what the weather is like.😆

  • @RimfireRanger
    @RimfireRanger Год назад +2

    I don’t carry a rifle for defense but I do use 5.56/.223 for prairie dog hunting. The soft points are my preferred bullets for that task. Mainly because you get more of the energy released sooner with the soft point and it will send the prairie dogs flying, where as the FMJs will sometimes just poke a small hole in them because it doesn’t start tumbling yet by the time it exits so they will just fall down and you don’t really know if you hit them or not unless you actually go out there and look for them

    • @joemama69448
      @joemama69448 Год назад

      I remember doing some pest control on a family friends property and the .223 would tear varmints in half. Rabbits, squirrels, maybe a couple gophers didn't stand a chance.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      😎👊

  • @Eduardojr01
    @Eduardojr01 Год назад +5

    Adoro também a plataforma AR , tenho um no calibre 556 x45. Parabéns pelo vídeo 👏

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      É um rifle muito capaz e facilmente consertado se necessário.😎👍

  • @Paladin1873
    @Paladin1873 Год назад +2

    Overpenetration does not appear to be an issue with either bullet design and both performed well. I'm glad you chose 25 yards for your test because that seems like a practical distance for defense against man or beast, and one the courts might be willing to accept. I'd choose the FMJ since it is proven to feed reliably in any rifle and costs less.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад

      😎👊

    • @carsonhunt4642
      @carsonhunt4642 11 месяцев назад

      I’m surprised you’re only one who mentioned that. It’s the only jam I ever get on properly maintained rifles , is a bullet catching on the feed ramp. Fmj seems to run fine, soft point and other various types catch more often.

  • @stedyone1090
    @stedyone1090 Год назад +1

    Great jelly test.
    Good to know.
    Thanks for sharing 👍 😊

  • @TheRios7018
    @TheRios7018 Год назад

    Always awesome content!
    Thanks bud I really appreciate what you do!
    👊💪🇺🇸

  • @garrettschienschang4399
    @garrettschienschang4399 Год назад +3

    Nice test. Would like to see something similar with a heavier round if you could as I keep Winchester 64grain jsp in mine and I’ve heard 77 is also a popular weight. Great video as always.

  • @Bob-lq9ys
    @Bob-lq9ys Год назад +1

    Great test, I have been kind of looking for a jelly test using 556/223, I start looking then get side-tracked LOL, Thank You

  • @rickl.1603
    @rickl.1603 11 месяцев назад

    Clothing with the gel. Thanks for valuable information!

  • @bobsmoot2392
    @bobsmoot2392 3 месяца назад +1

    HELP!!! I'm trapped in a loop. Everytime I'm done wating one of your awesome videos, I glance over at the side collum and see another one, I just HAVE TO WATCH!

  • @judge4321
    @judge4321 Год назад +3

    Definitely need the fabric .

  • @shanepitzer4126
    @shanepitzer4126 Год назад +1

    One thing is clearly illustrated in your test. With a 16" AR, there is really no great need for specialty ammo for general purpose use or defense. The 55gr SP would work as well as anything for defensive ammo. The ball too for that matter.

  • @jeffreyrobertson7652
    @jeffreyrobertson7652 Год назад +1

    Great video Tools Really enjoy these jelly test Stay Safe Stay 2A Strong 🇺🇸

  • @kingstoeck
    @kingstoeck 5 месяцев назад

    Great content appreciate it. I just ordered myself some 55gr soft pints for my ARs and AKs. Looks to do really nice.

  • @petemidwest1071
    @petemidwest1071 Год назад +1

    Outstanding! Something about hydrostatic shock that gets your attention! Ballistic tips next please!🙏 Thanks for the vid brother!👍🏼😎

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Yeah, you realize just how "weak" most handgun stuff is when you see a rifle test.

  • @WELL-WELL-WELL69
    @WELL-WELL-WELL69 2 месяца назад

    This channel is about to blow up in popularity

  • @kevinramsey4673
    @kevinramsey4673 Год назад +1

    Great test!

  • @Yourtimepiececurator
    @Yourtimepiececurator 3 месяца назад

    Best ammo tester on the internet, THANK YOU

  • @Mike_858
    @Mike_858 Год назад +4

    Great test, shooting gel that far away, aligning everything and get proper results is not easy - could you do 69 and 77 grain BTHP match bullets some time in the future? I heard they expand very violently

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +3

      Should be able to handle that. Thank you sir.😎👍

  • @leslieshepperd9850
    @leslieshepperd9850 Год назад +1

    Those M193 rounds were designed to be shot through a 20 inch barrel (M16) . At around 3200 f.p.s. those will tumble and come apart. That extra 200 f.p.s. velocity makes a big difference.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +2

      Apparently someone forgot to tell Federal because they don't even claim those velocities on the box.

  • @shanepitzer4126
    @shanepitzer4126 Год назад

    Excellent test, thanks for sharing!

  • @mot0rhe4d40
    @mot0rhe4d40 Год назад +1

    Figured those Federal 5.56 SP rounds would do good. Be picking some up shortly.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Yeah, I figured so too so I took a chance and bought quite a bit.

  • @Maatdrummer1
    @Maatdrummer1 Год назад

    I love Federal ammo of all kinds. Their round type consistancy is always excellant. Thank you. I love my AR and my 30-30. I have taken deer with both of them.

  • @user-ws4vt7zu5o
    @user-ws4vt7zu5o 9 месяцев назад

    They still got these for 11.59/box at outdoor limited, think I’ll grab a few before they go up. Excellent video as always, thank you!

  • @gogogo1064
    @gogogo1064 Год назад +3

    This was a great video

  • @rontate7719
    @rontate7719 5 месяцев назад

    VERY GOOD TESTING
    Catching up on some vids all around,this is tops.
    thx
    2.10.24

  • @guardianminifarm8005
    @guardianminifarm8005 Год назад

    Good data & demo. Thank you a bundle.

  • @timmarbell255
    @timmarbell255 Год назад

    Nice video again Toolman!

  • @l.a.3887
    @l.a.3887 Год назад +1

    Fantastic test I would go with the soft point also I like the clothing test myself grate job 👍

  • @dennislydon-dt4mq
    @dennislydon-dt4mq Год назад +3

    Wow, I hope the PMC Bronze 55 gr. SP has an immediate wound cavity like that, so now I’m really curious about the PMC. I’d like to see bare gel, and barrier of clothing. Love your videos, dialogue and your editing. Hell, I’d send some ammunition to test if I new how, or what the law is.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Thank you sir. Appreciate that. I'll definitely grab some this week.😎👍

  • @Nickrioblanco1
    @Nickrioblanco1 Год назад +4

    I think always using layers of on the gel test is a better idea, because when you don't use it you're always wondering if it would have made a difference. I personally believe the AR15 is better with the 277 Wolverine. Unfortunately it has not become popular. I hope maybe that will change.

    • @ToolsandTargets
      @ToolsandTargets  Год назад +1

      Never even heard of it.

    • @Nickrioblanco1
      @Nickrioblanco1 Год назад +1

      @@ToolsandTargets It is a .277 bullet on a necked up 5.56 case. Created by Mark Kexel of Mad Dog Weapons Systems around 2015 as a proprietary cartridge.

  • @jessjosh4119
    @jessjosh4119 Год назад

    I have been waiting for you to test these soft points since you bought them.awsome performance.i believe I'm hitting psa up for some

  • @yellowboxster06
    @yellowboxster06 Год назад

    As I recall, if you’re shooting beyond 55 yards with the 9mm you’re outside of the original NATO specification for the maximum effective range of this round in a handgun. This maximum range value made it’s way into the DoD specification for the M9 Beretta. So expected accuracy at that or longer ranges may be a bit sporting. I use your basic grip technique with my revolvers and while I’m not as good a shot as you, I can consistently hit steel targets out to 75 yards with my 3” Python shooting DA. Great video.

  • @jmmartin7766
    @jmmartin7766 Год назад

    Another great test! Really enjoy your videos! Another vote FOR the clothing barriers

  • @ShadowForge762
    @ShadowForge762 Год назад

    Was looking for a test on the Federal Champion SPs. They were on sale so I grabbed a bunch. Anything coming out of an AR is going to ruin someone's day, but it's good to see that it performs well.

  • @denniscraig6022
    @denniscraig6022 Год назад

    I believe that testing with clothing, both light and heavy, would give a good test for self-defense. Good show, thanks

  • @conro7003
    @conro7003 Год назад +1

    Favorite channel by far!😃Thanks so much!!
    Edit: I do like the clothing barrier.

  • @randyhavard6084
    @randyhavard6084 Год назад +1

    It's hard to argue with either of those results