It happened with flat TVs. I remember when a crappy 42" 720p plasma was $10,000. Now a huge 4k is less than one solar panel. Batteries are a LOT easier to make than TVs and no reason for them to expensive other than lack of production.
The general public are not bothered wether they are sodium or lithium give them a battery than can do 700 miles for a certain price and longevity and that is when it will take of
Do you have a comparison video where you show the different kinds of battery compositions, how the suffer, etc? Like what the early EVs used, all the way up to CATL today Thank you for your time
@@markthomasson5077 US is already producing more oil that ever before. Meanwhile, China is set to take over world auto market with affordable, quality EVs and battery innovations that leave the West stunned. Top oil executives are not stupid, they can read writing on the wall. Just a matter of time before global EV adoption drops the demand and price of oil forever. Many execs will already be planning their exit strategies. Meanwhile, same oil execs will keep promoting same old mindless slogans like 'drill, baby drill" so to leacve leave the lo-info rubes holding the empty investment bag when the whole thing collapses.
I said this months ago !!! Don't need to use AI to know that. Once there's ubiquitous supercharging, lower range of sodium ion batteries will become irrelevant.
In Canada and parts of North America It can and will get to -20 even -30 or feels like it So these improvements are much more needed then just Alaska lol
It its a case of being cheaper for roughly the same energy density and charge time, sodium would be the no-brainer. If its a case of the mountain climbing company is offering a 30 percent discount from the completion but their ropes aren't as strong, consumers will think twice before buying them.
The problem of Na batteries is the very wide voltage difference between charged and discharged is a very linear curve and BMS can't handle that big gap. I believe next gen are LMFP or maybe solid sate.
Thats a good point - have ordered some for testing and will use them with a buck / boost DC DC converter to keep Output voltage constant while the input Ranges from 6V to 15V
Hi Sam, love the content. I’m a big believer in hemp and wondering more about hemp cell batteries and where they are at and what the composition would look like?
The highest density battery would use silver oxide yes expensive yes but very recyclable best used for aerial taxi when you land exchange or recharge battery 🔋 done and done simple
Me gustaría saber tu opinión sobre la empresa NATRON, que está construyendo una fábrica de baterías de sodio y azul de Prusia en los Estados Unidos. Gracias
Asked my local mistral7b: >>> Will sodium ion batteries reach 200 Wh/kg energy density? Predicting the exact energy density that sodium-ion batteries will achieve is challenging, as it depends on ongoing research and technological advancements. However, current laboratory sodium-ion batteries have demonstrated specific energy densities around 150-200 Wh/kg, which already surpasses some commercially available lithium-ion batteries. It's possible that sodium-ion batteries could reach or even exceed the 200 Wh/kg mark in the future; however, it will require continuous research and development efforts to optimize various aspects of these batteries. >>> When will this happen? It is difficult to provide an exact timeline for when sodium-ion batteries will reach a specific energy density like 200 Wh/kg because technological advancements can be unpredictable and depend on multiple factors, including research breakthroughs, funding, industrial support, and market demand. Some estimates suggest that it may take several years to decades before commercial sodium-ion batteries achieve the desired energy density, but progress is being made steadily in this field. As more research unfolds, we can expect to see improved battery performance over time, with the goal of developing affordable, safe, and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions for various applications.
AI also said Abraham Lincoln was a Democrat. Also disclaimers saying don't use AI for research papers. Everything else might be true in the video, but AI doesn't add any weight to the discussion.
In America, Oil 🛢 will be held onto as absolutely as long as possible. Republicans recognize that their beloved Saudis Jets, Yachts, Artwork, Mansions all come with a price, and they will ensure that Americans pay for it.
Five years is a long time, Lithium batteries could improve dramatically also in that time period. So who knows? Wouldn’t doubt that something much better is discovered Using AI.
Dear Electric Viking. you need to stop opening videos with "AI predicts..." AI is not what you think it is and it cannot predict this stuff. Read a couple Google AI overviews and you'll realize these things are not really comprehending what they are saying. AI programs with specific jobs to do, like evaluate chemical compounds for desirable characteristics can be incredibly powerful, but this idea that we are approaching human level intelligence general AI is absolute nonsense. Chat GPT is dumb as bricks and easily manipulated. You do yourself a disservice when you start a video this way.
You're focusing your attention on the wrong part of the video . And I disagree with you about chatGPT. It's much smarter than you at most intellectual tasks even if it makes some silly mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes including newton and Einstein. And those mistakes are being eradicated on a daily basis . I think your mindset on AI will change in the very near future
Disagree. Choice of words for a quick update is in no way meant to be as precise as a doctoral thesis - it's meant to convey an overall concept. This was perfectly appropriate given it's context, timing, breadth. Chill.
Sam Evans use of AI doesn't mention whether it is USA-based AI or China-based AI neither AI are the same, especially, AI already used in industrial practice, or military practice (both a norm in China; but not yet in the USA)
It has just been annouced by iSeeCars that an EV is the deadliest car and that car brand is a tesla.The Tesla has more deaths reported per so many miles vs any other car manufacturer.
Interesting. I vaguely recall that a few years ago a report from a different organization called into question Tesla's safety record, but within a few days some people found a significant flaw in the study's methodology (unfortunately I can't recall the details). I'm not saying that the same thing will happen with this latest study, but it is a possibility. I suggest you do a search for, say, "iSeeCars Tesla dangerous" on google/youtube/X in a week's time to see if there are any such rebuttals. The iSeeCars report stated that several cars with high fatality rates had received high crash safety ratings, so the issue might be due to driver behaviour rather than particular car models being inherently unsafe. That reminded me of a book I read years ago called "Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences". One of the examples mentioned in the book concerned cars. Apparently, whenever a new safety feature (e.g., safety belts or airbags) is introduced in cars, initially the accident fatality rate drops, but then it starts to climb back up again, and this is thought to be because some drivers reason, "My car is now safer, so I can drive more recklessly". Perhaps this trend is now occurring again due to not-yet-perfected autonomous driving systems giving drivers a false sense of safety.
For Stationary storage,
Energy density doesn't matter.
Only cost matters.
LMFP L600 Astroinno cell and battery pack achieved a 1,000 km range, no NCM needed!
I can’t wait 🙂☃️🚗
Wow! $10/kWh within the next 10 years - a game-changer indeed!
It happened with flat TVs. I remember when a crappy 42" 720p plasma was $10,000. Now a huge 4k is less than one solar panel. Batteries are a LOT easier to make than TVs and no reason for them to expensive other than lack of production.
How does all this fit into the future of solid state batteries because all along we have been told that that's where things are heading to
The general public are not bothered wether they are sodium or lithium give them a battery than can do 700 miles for a certain price and longevity and that is when it will take of
bro thats 1100 kilometers. most petrol cars you're lucky to get 800km on a tank unless you have duel tanks.
This charges everything!
Awesome one. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
even the game?? 😂
@@orlovsskibet 😂
Do you have a comparison video where you show the different kinds of battery compositions, how the suffer, etc?
Like what the early EVs used, all the way up to CATL today
Thank you for your time
Chinese battery innovation could have been US battery innovation. Instead, GM literally crushed the EV1 in 1999.
Drill baby drill
@@markthomasson5077 US is already producing more oil that ever before.
Meanwhile, China is set to take over world auto market with affordable, quality EVs and battery innovations that leave the West stunned.
Top oil executives are not stupid, they can read writing on the wall. Just a matter of time before global EV adoption drops the demand and price of oil forever. Many execs will already be planning their exit strategies.
Meanwhile, same oil execs will keep promoting same old mindless slogans like 'drill, baby drill" so to leacve leave the lo-info rubes holding the empty investment bag when the whole thing collapses.
@@markthomasson5077that's a weird thing to say to a guy talking about batteries.
I said this months ago !!! Don't need to use AI to know that. Once there's ubiquitous supercharging, lower range of sodium ion batteries will become irrelevant.
I've only one concern about them: are they as safe as LFP ones? I haven't seen short-circuit tests of this ones whereas Ido have seen tests with LFPs
What about solid state silver battery
hey 4680 is 244 to 295 Wh/kg
In Canada and parts of North America It can and will get to -20 even -30 or feels like it
So these improvements are much more needed then just Alaska lol
It its a case of being cheaper for roughly the same energy density and charge time, sodium would be the no-brainer. If its a case of the mountain climbing company is offering a 30 percent discount from the completion but their ropes aren't as strong, consumers will think twice before buying them.
The problem of Na batteries is the very wide voltage difference between charged and discharged is a very linear curve and BMS can't handle that big gap. I believe next gen are LMFP or maybe solid sate.
Thats a good point - have ordered some for testing and will use them with a buck / boost DC DC converter to keep Output voltage constant while the input Ranges from 6V to 15V
👍👍
Hi Sam, love the content. I’m a big believer in hemp and wondering more about hemp cell batteries and where they are at and what the composition would look like?
😂
Problem with them is no density at all
The highest density battery would use silver oxide yes expensive yes but very recyclable best used for aerial taxi when you land exchange or recharge battery 🔋 done and done simple
Me gustaría saber tu opinión sobre la empresa NATRON, que está construyendo una fábrica de baterías de sodio y azul de Prusia en los Estados Unidos. Gracias
I'll bet they won't be as cheap as the one for my Diesel car.
You do realise that AI can not yet think right?
I don't think most people understand this.
Asked my local mistral7b:
>>> Will sodium ion batteries reach 200 Wh/kg energy density?
Predicting the exact energy density that sodium-ion batteries will
achieve is challenging, as it depends on ongoing research and
technological advancements. However, current laboratory sodium-ion
batteries have demonstrated specific energy densities around 150-200
Wh/kg, which already surpasses some commercially available lithium-ion
batteries. It's possible that sodium-ion batteries could reach or even
exceed the 200 Wh/kg mark in the future; however, it will require
continuous research and development efforts to optimize various aspects of
these batteries.
>>> When will this happen?
It is difficult to provide an exact timeline for when sodium-ion
batteries will reach a specific energy density like 200 Wh/kg because
technological advancements can be unpredictable and depend on multiple
factors, including research breakthroughs, funding, industrial support,
and market demand. Some estimates suggest that it may take several years
to decades before commercial sodium-ion batteries achieve the desired
energy density, but progress is being made steadily in this field. As more
research unfolds, we can expect to see improved battery performance over
time, with the goal of developing affordable, safe, and environmentally
friendly energy storage solutions for various applications.
AI also said Abraham Lincoln was a Democrat. Also disclaimers saying don't use AI for research papers. Everything else might be true in the video, but AI doesn't add any weight to the discussion.
In America, Oil 🛢 will be held onto as absolutely as long as possible. Republicans recognize that their beloved Saudis Jets, Yachts, Artwork, Mansions all come with a price, and they will ensure that Americans pay for it.
Five years is a long time, Lithium batteries could improve dramatically also in that time period. So who knows? Wouldn’t doubt that something much better is discovered Using AI.
I hear the state of Idaho is developing a super spud battery. Potatoes are the future 😂
I’d advising them to keep Chipping away and they’ll get their eventually 😂
You have got to be kidding me. Why are you taking what AI thinks into consideration? You may as well throw a dart at a board.
Lots of delusion here.
Dear Electric Viking. you need to stop opening videos with "AI predicts..." AI is not what you think it is and it cannot predict this stuff. Read a couple Google AI overviews and you'll realize these things are not really comprehending what they are saying. AI programs with specific jobs to do, like evaluate chemical compounds for desirable characteristics can be incredibly powerful, but this idea that we are approaching human level intelligence general AI is absolute nonsense. Chat GPT is dumb as bricks and easily manipulated. You do yourself a disservice when you start a video this way.
You're focusing your attention on the wrong part of the video . And I disagree with you about chatGPT. It's much smarter than you at most intellectual tasks even if it makes some silly mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes including newton and Einstein. And those mistakes are being eradicated on a daily basis . I think your mindset on AI will change in the very near future
@@camronrubin8599 meanwhile we are still waiting for sodium Iron battery let alone for real AI.
Disagree. Choice of words for a quick update is in no way meant to be as precise as a doctoral thesis - it's meant to convey an overall concept. This was perfectly appropriate given it's context, timing, breadth.
Chill.
Sam Evans use of AI doesn't mention whether it is USA-based AI or China-based AI
neither AI are the same, especially, AI already used in industrial practice, or military practice (both a norm in China; but not yet in the USA)
It must have been 10 minutes before a new battery has been invented, which like all other batteries that will come to nothing
Long live the Lithium battery, for the next 10 years at least.
Do they go on fire?
The moronic trolls are out
It has just been annouced by iSeeCars that an EV is the deadliest car and that car brand is a tesla.The Tesla has more deaths reported per so many miles vs any other car manufacturer.
Interesting. I vaguely recall that a few years ago a report from a different organization called into question Tesla's safety record, but within a few days some people found a significant flaw in the study's methodology (unfortunately I can't recall the details). I'm not saying that the same thing will happen with this latest study, but it is a possibility. I suggest you do a search for, say, "iSeeCars Tesla dangerous" on google/youtube/X in a week's time to see if there are any such rebuttals.
The iSeeCars report stated that several cars with high fatality rates had received high crash safety ratings, so the issue might be due to driver behaviour rather than particular car models being inherently unsafe. That reminded me of a book I read years ago called "Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences". One of the examples mentioned in the book concerned cars. Apparently, whenever a new safety feature (e.g., safety belts or airbags) is introduced in cars, initially the accident fatality rate drops, but then it starts to climb back up again, and this is thought to be because some drivers reason, "My car is now safer, so I can drive more recklessly". Perhaps this trend is now occurring again due to not-yet-perfected autonomous driving systems giving drivers a false sense of safety.
My flirting style is a mix of sarcasm and accidentally spilling my drink💖
Yet another spam account.