The problem with the rules is that a lot of the refs are high as a kite and don’t care what happens and don’t wanna look like the “bad guy” calling their peers out
i think it comes from the era of the main group of skaters...where an impossible is a joke trick...no respect to it so they just kinda shrug and go whatever
I vote for Dumb Data as official batb rule writer and referee. Agree that the impossible rule should go both ways in respect to the 360 shove, and actually be enforced.
An impossible was designed as vertical boardwrap and should be treated as such. Some leeway given, of course, but most people call their ugly ass wrapped shuvs an impossible when it aint.
@@TeemoQuinton I agree, but it's hard to write a rule for something that has such a big range for interpretation. How wrapped is wrapped enough? How vertical is vertical enough? Front foot impossibles are pretty much never vertical (unless its garret hill) but those always count. I'd hate to be writing the rules for skate if it was an Olympic game haha.
BATB would be judged more fairly if they only allowed a select few people to Ref the battles, and made sure each person was trained appropriately and showed no bias. Instead they just hand the biggest responsibility over to any one of the homies who just happens to be in the building that day and doesn’t mind being on camera
A lot of the referees know the skaters and are biased. Impossible has always been up to wrap since the 80s and 90s We knew it back then, front or back foot impossible meaning contact with the foot all the way around. If not it's, not done right.
@@itisjustacomment yeah, the whole verticality thing is taken out of context most times. although the 3 shuv impossible has been around for decades. if the board does a 360 rotation in any direct. and never leaves the back foot. its an impossible. although traditionally the goal was to just make the board flip on the verticle access, but skateboarding changes and evolves... an ollie was a vert trick. which is why it was called a flat ground ollie. we just call it an ollie now, and the trick is trastically different than it was when mullen invented it. mullens early ollies used kinetic energy. he ollied like newbs with a tech deck. we use potential energy for ollies now. we use our strength, not abusing kinetic energy to manipulate the way a piece of wood moves. but using potential energy to force the board off the ground.
The 13 year old Christion reffing was absolutely on point. Kid made perfect calls according to the rules the whole game. Then the next week there was the dude who had Joslin redo multiple tricks without any toe drags at all, it was like he’d never read the rules or watched a game before. Like every trick had to be bolts to count. Christion best ref of the season so far. It’s not that difficult and they should def be able to check replays for actual ground drags.
Had a friend that did the Shane O’Neil three shove that he would claim impossible. All of us would hurt his feelings every time we called him out on it
Why does he care so much, a 3 shuv is a good trick to have I do 3 shuvs like your friend, it kinda goes a bit vertical, but I’ve never been under the impression it is an impossible. When I play with ppl nowadays they’re so itching to call ppl out they yell “THATS NOT AN IMPOSSIBLE REDO”, but I’m like “I never said I was gonna do an impossible… it’s a 3 shuv”
@@nikinovski he quit skating and moved for a football scholarship he’s doing great for himself. I see what he does here and there but he loves across country now
I don’t know why the Berrics haven’t cleaned up their reffing. It’s easily the number one beef viewers have with the series, and the complaints are typically warranted. Also, super easy to fix. Any number of skate rats would do the job for free. I would do it for a plane ticket and a couch to sleep on, and that’s only because I live in Boston.
Being from the 80s and 90s skating we understood that the impossible always had to wrap. This means contact around the foot all the time, front foot impossible or back foot impossible.
some wack impossibles look horizontal, but there is contact with the back foot all the time, while some others are huge and vertical with very aggressive wrapping, but the back foot clearly loses contact with the board for a split second. It's not that simple.
Great vid as always. I'd love to see the data on 360's vs 180 reverts one day! It always sucks to see someone hang a beautiful 360 only to have the opponent just slide/pivot out of thiers. It's in the same category as the impossible/3 shuv discrepency imo. There's a few prominent current skaters that are really bad for this and the refs just let it go.
@@vperkv6554 Yeah he's really bad for it iirc. :D He's an amazing talent for sure, but it is a bit cheap tbh. It's just a low risk way of pulling it off. A 180 revert is a different trick to a 360. It really shouldn't be hard to ref it. Didn't one of the refs call someone out for it recently, or is my memory fooling me?
If you do an impossible on defense against a 360 shuvit, it should not count, it's a different trick. Therefore it is implied that you only have to wrap on defense against an impossible.
If the board isn’t vertical and your foot twirls it around, it counts as a 3 Shuv on defence because it is. If the board is vertical and touching the back foot then it is an impossible.
This is the best rabbit hole video you’ve done. And I actually learned something in the past weeks, because of your polls. They made me realize what I think an impossible truly is. And I very much agree with the outcome of this video 👍
The way the announcer basically puked out "OLLiE IMPOSSIBLE".. 😂😂😂 I was like AYO WHAT THE F*CK.... ? Like a dam bird 🕊️ flying by trolling the skaters. They really smoking trees behind those mics.
this is one of my favourite videos in this channel an that says a lot. it's interesting because prior to the discussion around the batb wrap rule, i would say an impossible is about the y-axis rotation, as it seems like that was what rodney mullen and his peers were trying to achieve with the trick, and the foot-wrapping was more of a tool to make it physically viable. however, i call out non-wrapped impossibles all the time. now i'm not sure anymore if a full rotation on the y-axis without wrapping should be an impossible or not. still have to think about it, love that the video triggered this train of thought
This is why I love YT. I remember a few months back I was watching a bunch of BATB clips and noticed that some impossible's just looked better than others. I watched the physicsgirl video and went down a shallow rabbit hole regarding the trick, but eventually just went on with my life because there wasn't much there. Now there's a full 18-min research video on the same topic. Thank you sir.
Yooo a serious attempt at bringing this type of competition to the Olympics would be wild. You're right that it should technically be easier to judge than the current type of contests, especially with video replay. I can just imagine the mashup of styles between street and freestyle skating for this new event 💯🔥
Any question of what an impossible is or how it is to be executed should simply reference the New Deal video 1281 released in 1991 and watch Ed Templetons section towards the end of the video. This is text book flawless execution.
If your foot doesn't pull the board into the air during the wrap then it's not a classical impossible (Mullen impossible). That's how I grade it, so an imposterble only gets the rotation from the pop with the foot hovering/just following it. A true impossible needs no pop.
If you can select which nuanced way you want to do an impossible, then they deserve to be called different (adult) names. Thank you dumb data, we need this kind of trick breakdown. Loving your content ❤
If you watch Zach Doellings 'impossible' in slow mo, you can clearly see that his backfoot has no contact with the board. It looks like an impossble but it's simply a three shov. To be save, every impossible should be checked in slow mo afterwards.
I like to watch this channel and imagine that the whole scene cared this much about SKATE. Like, attaching gyros and GPS in to skaters boards so we can decide if they got enough rotation on the correct axis. Contact points on their shoes so they light up on a toe drag. And yeah, flatground at the olympics. It would be a nicer world, probably.
Don't agree w/ everything here, but you make a great point about the olympics - wear a uniform and be judged subjectively is not what skating is about. Give me Griffin driving international kids to new levels of flatground consistency any day. Great video as always. Keep it up!
Before I even knew what a kickflip was or seeing any pro videos when I was young I always wanted to do the "zero flip". Pretty cool to actually see it landed
This is such a great video. This video is made for skaters like me who care about the technical stuff. The impossible is still my all time favorite trick. It feels so nice when it wraps and gets vertical. Just the best feeling ever in skating. That and a nice popped kickflip.
Monster flips are legit different trick to impossible they are really difficult They are also neither 360 hard aka fronside 360 flip OR 360 inward heel aka backside 360 heelflip as they are both rotating the board on 2 axis where as a monster flip only rotates on 1 axis But still really cool video and id love to see a full Olympic game of skate that really would be inase to watch and cheer everyone on but like you said they really do have to get the rules down and keep to them
There’s just a judging problem. I don’t think the “opponent”, verbiage means that if defense does a better trick, offense loses turn and now has to do the defender’s trick.
Definitely the biggest difference is the wrap however, if it has some verticality, it not only looks better, but can help differentiate the impossible and the 3 shuv
4:10 Left is scooping, right is wrapping. It doesn't matter if the foot stays in contact or not, it's how you get the rotation. That's why pressure flips ate their own thing
z axis rotation differentiates an impossible from a 3 shuv and foot wrap differentiates it from a zero/monster flip. I always thought the former necessitated the latter, but the existence of zero/monster flips obviously proves that wrong
Worth noting in Joslins case, his do overs weren't from toe drags. The first one was but the 2nd was the ref wasn't happy with the complete rotation of his 180. So what do you do in that scenario? He's burned his redo for a toe drag, but there's nothing to say that that's the only redo, just the redo for toe dragging.
I was really surprised SKATE wasnt in the Olympics. i assumed they were gonna give it the least amount of money and care possible and just copy the berrics lmao
I learned impossibles in the 90's by accident, sometimes my back foot would get stuck under the tail when doing a pressure flip and when I would try to get it out of the way it would do a perfect impossible wrap. For me impossibles always started as a pressure flip then the centrifugal force of the board wrapping around my foot did the rest, I don't see how it could be an "impossible"without the wrap from the pressure flip to start it off. I'm only halfway through the video so I don't know if it gets brought up yet, but without the wrap isn't it a monster flip?
Try doing an unpossible. You simply put just enough pressure to rotate the board vertically and SLOW the rotation of the board to prevent any flips. It's like a vertical pressure 360 shuv. It's not impossible, just uncommon
I guess the best front foot impossible (unpossible) for me is Garrett Hill's and I really appreciate how you explained all these variance. Ollie impossible sounds kind of weird though. I guess I have not seen pressure impossible yet. lol
The problem with the rules is that a lot of the refs are high as a kite and don’t care what happens and don’t wanna look like the “bad guy” calling their peers out
there should be A referee
@@VictorAlbaathe berratron
i think it comes from the era of the main group of skaters...where an impossible is a joke trick...no respect to it so they just kinda shrug and go whatever
They treat it like a joke because they can't do it correctly if at all.
it’s not that serious
I vote for Dumb Data as official batb rule writer and referee.
Agree that the impossible rule should go both ways in respect to the 360 shove, and actually be enforced.
Honestly, I don't there's anyone more qualified. Like, the man has a fucking obsession.
Yes! Let the man organize, write the rules, officiate and choose the contestants for BATB ❤
An impossible was designed as vertical boardwrap and should be treated as such. Some leeway given, of course, but most people call their ugly ass wrapped shuvs an impossible when it aint.
@@TeemoQuinton I agree, but it's hard to write a rule for something that has such a big range for interpretation. How wrapped is wrapped enough? How vertical is vertical enough? Front foot impossibles are pretty much never vertical (unless its garret hill) but those always count. I'd hate to be writing the rules for skate if it was an Olympic game haha.
“Imposterble” should be legitimately coined as a 360 Shuvit mistakenly counted as an Impossible.
Underrated comment
Ye
They are called imposters
BATB would be judged more fairly if they only allowed a select few people to Ref the battles, and made sure each person was trained appropriately and showed no bias. Instead they just hand the biggest responsibility over to any one of the homies who just happens to be in the building that day and doesn’t mind being on camera
A lot of the referees know the skaters and are biased.
Impossible has always been up to wrap since the 80s and 90s We knew it back then, front or back foot impossible meaning contact with the foot all the way around.
If not it's, not done right.
I’m totally cool with that
@@itisjustacomment yeah, the whole verticality thing is taken out of context most times.
although the 3 shuv impossible has been around for decades. if the board does a 360 rotation in any direct. and never leaves the back foot. its an impossible.
although traditionally the goal was to just make the board flip on the verticle access, but skateboarding changes and evolves...
an ollie was a vert trick. which is why it was called a flat ground ollie. we just call it an ollie now, and the trick is trastically different than it was when mullen invented it.
mullens early ollies used kinetic energy. he ollied like newbs with a tech deck. we use potential energy for ollies now. we use our strength, not abusing kinetic energy to manipulate the way a piece of wood moves.
but using potential energy to force the board off the ground.
The 13 year old Christion reffing was absolutely on point. Kid made perfect calls according to the rules the whole game. Then the next week there was the dude who had Joslin redo multiple tricks without any toe drags at all, it was like he’d never read the rules or watched a game before. Like every trick had to be bolts to count. Christion best ref of the season so far. It’s not that difficult and they should def be able to check replays for actual ground drags.
Had a friend that did the Shane O’Neil three shove that he would claim impossible. All of us would hurt his feelings every time we called him out on it
Why does he care so much, a 3 shuv is a good trick to have
I do 3 shuvs like your friend, it kinda goes a bit vertical, but I’ve never been under the impression it is an impossible. When I play with ppl nowadays they’re so itching to call ppl out they yell “THATS NOT AN IMPOSSIBLE REDO”, but I’m like “I never said I was gonna do an impossible… it’s a 3 shuv”
Had? What happened to your friend?
@@nikinovski he quit skating and moved for a football scholarship he’s doing great for himself. I see what he does here and there but he loves across country now
@@debomb721 idk we were 14 year old kids you know you don’t wanna be false claiming things you cannot do correctly
@@debomb721 What??? theres no redo for setting a trick and you have to call your trick before
I love these videos so much, equal parts hilarious and intruiging. With the sweet bonus of making me want to go out and skate.
I don’t know why the Berrics haven’t cleaned up their reffing. It’s easily the number one beef viewers have with the series, and the complaints are typically warranted. Also, super easy to fix. Any number of skate rats would do the job for free. I would do it for a plane ticket and a couch to sleep on, and that’s only because I live in Boston.
Being from the 80s and 90s skating we understood that the impossible always had to wrap.
This means contact around the foot all the time, front foot impossible or back foot impossible.
I've been WRAPPING vertically all impossibles since like 1988. Both WRAP and VERTICAL is an impossible. 3 shoves R WAY easier..........
Preach❤
some wack impossibles look horizontal, but there is contact with the back foot all the time, while some others are huge and vertical with very aggressive wrapping, but the back foot clearly loses contact with the board for a split second. It's not that simple.
YUUUUUP!!!!!
This.
Great vid as always. I'd love to see the data on 360's vs 180 reverts one day! It always sucks to see someone hang a beautiful 360 only to have the opponent just slide/pivot out of thiers. It's in the same category as the impossible/3 shuv discrepency imo. There's a few prominent current skaters that are really bad for this and the refs just let it go.
COUGH, JAMIE GRIFFIN , COUGH COUGH.
DAM, covid.
Must have been one of the many boosterz lingering, 🙃
@@vperkv6554 Yeah he's really bad for it iirc. :D He's an amazing talent for sure, but it is a bit cheap tbh. It's just a low risk way of pulling it off.
A 180 revert is a different trick to a 360. It really shouldn't be hard to ref it.
Didn't one of the refs call someone out for it recently, or is my memory fooling me?
Agreed
I feel like you don’t have to wrap your impossible if you show up in a Cariuma shirt. And “Unpossible” comes from a Ralph Wiggum quote.
This video has the energy of a high school sophomore explaining to all the teachers how they're wrong.
RadRat shout out noice
I love Rad Rat!
If you do an impossible on defense against a 360 shuvit, it should not count, it's a different trick. Therefore it is implied that you only have to wrap on defense against an impossible.
Exactly, why would the person who sets the trick be forced to do another trick out of turn just because their opponent did the wrong trick lol
ikr, what even was that question, weird.
exactly my thoughts, what is the person in the video even fucking talking about... good lord@@TheGhostOfFredZeppelin
If the board isn’t vertical and your foot twirls it around, it counts as a 3 Shuv on defence because it is. If the board is vertical and touching the back foot then it is an impossible.
This is the best rabbit hole video you’ve done. And I actually learned something in the past weeks, because of your polls. They made me realize what I think an impossible truly is. And I very much agree with the outcome of this video 👍
This Video Just Made my Whole day..
Thank You Data 🙏❤️🔥🍻
6:12 Shane's Imposterble haha, that's gold
The way the announcer basically puked out "OLLiE IMPOSSIBLE".. 😂😂😂 I was like AYO WHAT THE F*CK.... ?
Like a dam bird 🕊️ flying by trolling the skaters.
They really smoking trees behind those mics.
"RUclips skateboarding legend Rad Rat" bahahahahah :DDD with that pause after he said it
this is one of my favourite videos in this channel an that says a lot. it's interesting because prior to the discussion around the batb wrap rule, i would say an impossible is about the y-axis rotation, as it seems like that was what rodney mullen and his peers were trying to achieve with the trick, and the foot-wrapping was more of a tool to make it physically viable. however, i call out non-wrapped impossibles all the time. now i'm not sure anymore if a full rotation on the y-axis without wrapping should be an impossible or not. still have to think about it, love that the video triggered this train of thought
This is why I love YT. I remember a few months back I was watching a bunch of BATB clips and noticed that some impossible's just looked better than others. I watched the physicsgirl video and went down a shallow rabbit hole regarding the trick, but eventually just went on with my life because there wasn't much there. Now there's a full 18-min research video on the same topic. Thank you sir.
“Tragically titled monster flip.” I’m so glad someone finally said it. Dumb name. Already had a name. And yea, plugs is the best
There is a reason why Freestyle contests went away.. thanks for reminding me why they did...
Yooo a serious attempt at bringing this type of competition to the Olympics would be wild. You're right that it should technically be easier to judge than the current type of contests, especially with video replay. I can just imagine the mashup of styles between street and freestyle skating for this new event 💯🔥
11:05 LOL I finally got a feature in a Dumb Data video. My life is now complete
look ma im on tv!
love this style video, wonder what other tricks you could delve into
14:00 "In the 240p clip" lmaooo
13:57 “tragically titled” I’m dead💀
Jason calling those impossible has me rolling 😂
“Me fail English? That’s unpossible” - R.Wiggum
Any question of what an impossible is or how it is to be executed should simply reference the New Deal video 1281 released in 1991 and watch Ed Templetons section towards the end of the video. This is text book flawless execution.
My dude, this is amazing. Such detail and research. The Berrics needs to hire you.
Preach sir , Ty for the time making this piece ❤
If your foot doesn't pull the board into the air during the wrap then it's not a classical impossible (Mullen impossible). That's how I grade it, so an imposterble only gets the rotation from the pop with the foot hovering/just following it. A true impossible needs no pop.
If you can select which nuanced way you want to do an impossible, then they deserve to be called different (adult) names. Thank you dumb data, we need this kind of trick breakdown. Loving your content ❤
SKATE WILL BE IN THE OLYMPICS. IT IS THE ULTIMATE SKATEBOARDING BATTLE.
If your opponent wraps their impossible...
this is a very in depth analysis... and I really like it !
Mans said a whole ' three-hundred and sixty degree pop shove it '. This is how you know skateboarding is an Olympic sport.
Learned from this video:
- Impossibles are a mind f*ck;
- Jonny Giger's impossible is the best;
- Can't unsee sheepy Mota with his thumbs up
Man, you don't know it for now but in few years you are gonna be one of the judges of the first battle in the olympics.
If you watch Zach Doellings 'impossible' in slow mo, you can clearly see that his backfoot has no contact with the board. It looks like an impossble but it's simply a three shov. To be save, every impossible should be checked in slow mo afterwards.
100% I thought the Olympics should have been a game of SKATE
I like to watch this channel and imagine that the whole scene cared this much about SKATE.
Like, attaching gyros and GPS in to skaters boards so we can decide if they got enough rotation on the correct axis.
Contact points on their shoes so they light up on a toe drag.
And yeah, flatground at the olympics.
It would be a nicer world, probably.
Great video & yes All types of games of skate need to be in the olimpics/street league.
Am I the only one who got a wrapify ad right when he said , "what is a wrap?"
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
"...with Physics Girl, an indoor beanie, and a $150 designer t-shirt..." 😂
Bono and The Edge need to wrap a lot of impossibles
BATB: Does awful rule following and makes game of skate look bad
ESPN-X-Games : "Hold my beer"
Don't agree w/ everything here, but you make a great point about the olympics - wear a uniform and be judged subjectively is not what skating is about. Give me Griffin driving international kids to new levels of flatground consistency any day. Great video as always. Keep it up!
great analysis. Another controversial trick: dolphin flip. It's just a weird varial kickflip. fight me
If you can do an impossible you know the difference... Absolutely different tricks with aboslutely different execution and feeling to it
Great work as usual
I would say a wrap would be performed from the moment following of the pop/scoop and rotating SOMEWHERE around the foot and guiding the rotation.
Rodney clearly says in the beginning that its a ‘scoop’ trick….
Before I even knew what a kickflip was or seeing any pro videos when I was young I always wanted to do the "zero flip". Pretty cool to actually see it landed
Great video. Someone please correct the Ghetto Bird. The Ghetto Bird is ONLY done Nollie. It is a Nollie Hardflip FS Revert/Late FS 180.
being in college currently, monster flip is still on top
Bro you should get into law.. you're 100% correct, the rule wasn't enforced the way it was announced.
The issue lands with Berrics. Terrible job with determining a ref.
This is such a great video. This video is made for skaters like me who care about the technical stuff. The impossible is still my all time favorite trick. It feels so nice when it wraps and gets vertical. Just the best feeling ever in skating. That and a nice popped kickflip.
6:26 "i see... and is the fakie impossible in the room with us right now?"
Keep up the great work dude you are a hero !!!!
Monster flips are legit different trick to impossible they are really difficult
They are also neither 360 hard aka fronside 360 flip OR 360 inward heel aka backside 360 heelflip as they are both rotating the board on 2 axis where as a monster flip only rotates on 1 axis
But still really cool video and id love to see a full Olympic game of skate that really would be inase to watch and cheer everyone on but like you said they really do have to get the rules down and keep to them
Impossible wrap and usually a scoop trick but that sick FF impossible at the berriks popped hard
Ed Templeton in useless wooden toys is the perfect impossible
I did that poll! I’m officially a dumb data statistic! 🎉🎉
There’s just a judging problem. I don’t think the “opponent”, verbiage means that if defense does a better trick, offense loses turn and now has to do the defender’s trick.
I’m not sure why he even tried to make that point. So stupid. We all know what the rule means when it says “opponent”
The rule should just be: “you must wrap your impossible “…
never thought a vid about 2 tricks could be so interesting, fun watch
The best part about name debates is the people who can do them don’t seem to really care what you call it.
“Your opponent” in the verbiage is inherently seen as the one setting the trick
I like how dumb data gets to choose what names for tricks are timeless or not.
I would love to see a Game of Skate tournament at the Olympics
Definitely the biggest difference is the wrap however, if it has some verticality, it not only looks better, but can help differentiate the impossible and the 3 shuv
Everything about this video is perfection.
4:10 Left is scooping, right is wrapping. It doesn't matter if the foot stays in contact or not, it's how you get the rotation. That's why pressure flips ate their own thing
z axis rotation differentiates an impossible from a 3 shuv and foot wrap differentiates it from a zero/monster flip. I always thought the former necessitated the latter, but the existence of zero/monster flips obviously proves that wrong
There’s a community of old heads that use the term ollie impossible and 360° pop shove interchangeably
Worth noting in Joslins case, his do overs weren't from toe drags. The first one was but the 2nd was the ref wasn't happy with the complete rotation of his 180. So what do you do in that scenario? He's burned his redo for a toe drag, but there's nothing to say that that's the only redo, just the redo for toe dragging.
I contributed to the making of this video.
Legend has it if you wear cariuma you will never do a proper wrapped impossible
I was really surprised SKATE wasnt in the Olympics. i assumed they were gonna give it the least amount of money and care possible and just copy the berrics lmao
Even if Berrics acts like they care about the rules 😂
In contests, tricks are sometimes mislabeled. Also, commentator talked in the rush of the moment with an angle possibly different than the camera's.
“IMPOSTER-ble” 😂
amazing. Now do the fakie 5-0/fakie nosegrind debate
I just love nerdy analytical skateboarding videos
"Imposterble" ...Nice...
I learned impossibles in the 90's by accident, sometimes my back foot would get stuck under the tail when doing a pressure flip and when I would try to get it out of the way it would do a perfect impossible wrap. For me impossibles always started as a pressure flip then the centrifugal force of the board wrapping around my foot did the rest, I don't see how it could be an "impossible"without the wrap from the pressure flip to start it off. I'm only halfway through the video so I don't know if it gets brought up yet, but without the wrap isn't it a monster flip?
hey DD, do you maintain a database or, did you create one? are you using spreadsheets?
Eric koston and steve berra NEED to watch this video! They don't know what their doing.
Try doing an unpossible. You simply put just enough pressure to rotate the board vertically and SLOW the rotation of the board to prevent any flips. It's like a vertical pressure 360 shuv. It's not impossible, just uncommon
I guess the best front foot impossible (unpossible) for me is Garrett Hill's and I really appreciate how you explained all these variance. Ollie impossible sounds kind of weird though. I guess I have not seen pressure impossible yet. lol
Reminds me of the pop shuvit/Casper rewind that happened last year
Are we sure this isn’t just Gifted Hater with voice fx?
Need to get a reliable referee in there so we can gamble on this shit
Impossible on the hip at 1:26 is so beast
I swear Koston has done a few impossibles on defence in response to an offensive 3 shuv as well
I just learn that with the foot wrap