James has always been my favorite book in the Bible. It gets right down to the basics of Christianity. Its like looking into a mirror. Self reflection. 😊
Was driving through my local town last week and saw a rainbow over a church dedicated to St James. It really stood out and today I came across this video.
Well sir, in another month I turn 79 and I am sharing with you this terrific discovery of James, Jesus' brother. I've been spending a lot of time with the Gospel of Thomas in the process. It seems to me that because it recommends going to James about questions, the text of the Gospel of Thomas must itself reflect what James was saying and promoting. Because of that, I'm feeling like the Gospel of Thomas is the place for me to learn more about James' thinking. That is proving fruitful to me. In any case, the best to you in your continued studies and ponderings. Peace. Neil
The book of James is talking to the twelve tribes, James 1:1 James a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad. Jesus sent apostle Paul to preach the gospel for us today in the dispensation of grace. The gospel of our salvation is found in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4. Ephesians 2:8-9. 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workmen that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. We’re not Isreal, we’re the body of Christ. Praise the Lord our God for his grace, mercy and peace.
@@Ibelievethegospel The only person who sent Paul to teach to the gentiles was Paul. You can't use someone's claiming of authority as the authority. Paul claimed authority no one else gave him. He claimed apostleship to the Cor believers but the true apostles only called him a brother. The gentiles were given to Peter so there was no need for Paul to come in and "clarify" Jesus' message. Jesus didn't stutter. He was quite clear in His command that ONLY the 12 apostles had the judicial authority on matters of His church and Paul didn't even come on the scene until nearly 10 years later with a "vision" that can not be supported by anyone. The people with him said they saw that Paul was seeing something but they neither heard nor saw anything themself. Paul probably thought he was doing the Lord's work but he clearly was in NO place of authority from Christ so take his interpretations through the lens of a third hand source and don't ignore those who had first hand sources with Jesus...unless you believe that Jesus sat out in the desert with Paul for 3 years and taught him(as Paul claims) even though Jesus said He would not return to the end of the age AND that the disciples and apostleships should be on guard for anyone claiming to be coming in his name from the desert(exactly where Paul came out of).
Yes, James says it all. Short and sweet, it tells us how we should think and act, how we should humble ourselves, help the needy, and to remind ourselves that our lives are like mists and flowers, soon to disappear. God be praised!
I have been interested in James’ place in Christianity and that of the family for many years, and have been aware of this discussion. It is, however, interesting to get James Tabor’s view on it and to confirm what I learned 20 years ago backed by updated information. When people ask me if I am a Christian, I often comment that I am more of a Jesus Christian than a Pauline Christian. If Jesus is God’s man on earth, and he is the way, the truth and the light, then why is most of the New Testament about Paul, who never knew or met Jesus while he was alive, spent perhaps a couple weeks with Peter and James, who did not take well to him, and was sent off to talk to the Gentiles, where he made up his own theology as he went along. I have always questioned if some of the texts attributed to Paul were written by or truly attributed to Paul. 2000 years later, it is very difficult to get close to the fountain of truth and knowledge concerning a the origins of Christianity. The Church certainly did spin it to a different advantage, which helped to control the masses for a very long time. These days many people have curiosity and want to get closer to truth. Christianity needs to be updated if it is to survive another 100 years, let alone 2000 years. Christian denominations break apart over some simple ideas, so that today there are between 43,000 and 45,000 denominations world wide.
I love learning from this man. I have a habit of researching things that I hear to determine truth. I learned quickly that it was a waste of time with Dr. Tabor. I never found anything he said to be wrong. He's even unbiased in his guesses in my opinion. I truly value his thoughts and opinions on anything in biblical history.
agreed, Paul was a Greek that tried to appease the Roman public and inserted proto-pagan beliefs to align Christianity more towards the tastes of the Roman populace
@@AR-tb9hq Paul was a Greek speaking Jew of the Tribe of Benjamin he was also a Roman citizen and a Pharisee. I have thought for a long time that he deliberately or otherwise led Christians astray. It’s frightening how many Christians quote his writings rather than the Four Gospels. It’s as if they don’t care to focus on Christ who after all told us he is the only way to the Father.
Paul might have taken it in the wrong direction but who's to say that Christianity would have survived under James's right direction? Paul spread Christianity to the Gentiles maybe under James it would have only remained a Jewish movement much like the Samaritans. Say what you want against Paul but even in his flawed sort of way he made Jesus known to the world.
If you have researched it for 15 years, then you probably already know about this one. But for the sake of those who may not yet know about this book from Robert H. Eisenman: "James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls Paperback - March 1, 1998"
@Wholly_His One who takes the entirety of their being that is to become or to behold. places it on a path of desired achievement /attainment. they are becoming what is meant as a warship. hopefully in the direction of right action, devineitive ...balanced emotions, full of desire love, only to navigate around distraction.......maby?¿ O'buan...
Your scholarship is just amazingly great. Continue with the Non Bias Narrative. Even us Muslim are attracted by it. We love you for the sake of Allah. Peace be upon you. ❤️
Incredible brother! Your research and study has definitely payed off. Wow. Crazy to think that Jesus as well as his Family were actually all royalty. Blessings 🙏
As a convert to Islam from Paulianity. Your work is phenomenal and reinforces my faith. Thankyou for your unapologetic truthfulness and helping us understand the true Jesus
please know islam was made about 600 years after the resurection of YAHUSHA (JESUS) and also Muhammed try commiting suicide after visitation from the suppose angel Gabriel. which leads me to belive it wasent the angel Gabriel that visited Muhammed but it was satan himself masquerading as a angel of light to decieve Muhammed to make islam to conquer the world.
also i dont think of jesus would endorse a warlord and pfile (looking at u too prosperity gospel preaching warlord evangelicals .. was a wae@@ChristinaFromRUclips
@@ChristinaFromRUclipsGospel of Basilides, letters of Ignatius of Antioch refuting early Christians who believed Jesus did not die, Hebrews 5:7 corresponding to Jesus’ cry to be saved when he was being crucified, some Gnostic texts say Simon of Cyrene replaced Jesus on the cross. This shows that the Islamic position is not foreign to even Christianity.
@@T-19- Jesus died and was raised from the dead by YHVH because the promise is that those who do not sin will live. Death could not hold the sinless man even when he was murdered because he was without sin and YHVH keeps his promise that the righteous will not die.
"align perfectly" bruh, Ebionites teach that Jesus had a father, Joseph. Ebionites taught vegetarian kashrut(all vegetables are pareve anyway) Your Quran says that Isa had no father and also created birds from clay(taken from Gnostics)
@@demonking86420 half true. there were at 2 sects of the Ebonites. one group thought Jesus was born of both Joseph and Mary and they other thought he was born of the holy spirit and Mary.
PRAISE JESUS! He wanted TEAM MEMBERS not a fan club! Huge difference! Not as many saved as they think they are! Repent and seek his words for they are your only chance at SALVATION and ETERNAL LIFE! ❤❤❤
Excellent video. Speaking of how "the church" reacted ... it became a cult. The book of Acts makes that abundantly clear. The story of Ananias and Saphira. Dr. Tabor, you should cover that one. Most definitely.
Makes me wonder how after being raised by a devout dad and having to attend church every Sunday, as well as religious instructions once a week, that I have never understood one damn bit of any of this.
Just keep in mind that it was written to the 12 tribes of Israel. James 1:1 “James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.”
I only recently, but maybe the last 5-7 years actually started reading my bible. I had been raised in a Baptist church and went into volunteer ministry with the youth's. In reading (over and over), I couldn't help but see the different message that it seemed Paul was bringing than that of what Jesus was teaching. And that the book of James and even 1st John were so similar to what Jesus said. Paul's writing seems to have created a very diverse and argumentative foundation for our beliefs. Something sinister or intentional may be the reason for so much of the "Christian faith" following what Paul wrote. Scary.
Sorry for the failure of your spiritual leaders to convey to you what the Bible clearly teaches of which they may be ignorant. My comment below should help a lot. The Berean Bible Society has multiple booklets and online pubs that provide detailed explanations for what I present abbreviated below. CHURCH FAILURES Sorry for the all too frequent disparagement of St. Paul and his message despite the obvious (to the discerning reader) supersession (NOT DISTORTION) of the Gospel of the Kingdom (works + faith) by Paul's message of faith in Jesus alone I Cor. 15:1-4. The timing of Paul's message follows the failures (Acts 1-8) of the Gospel of the Kingdom group: financial depletion, Apostles remaining in Jerusalem (not "to all the world") and limited gospel distribution just to Jews Acts 8) and then only by Jewish refugees expelled by Rome to Cyprus, and other locations outside of Israel. INTERPRETATIONS OF LITERATURE As with all writings and rules, the most recent ones are the ones to follow. We don't view every of the deceased to properly administer an estate just the most recent. Paul's Gospel of Grace is the most recent and what we should follow until Jesus returns. Even this professor doesn't seem to get it because, James' theme clearly adds works to God's demands in contrast to the "wholly by Grace" theme (not under the Law - Rom 6) delivered to Saul outside of Israel by Jesus Christ himself in a vision to Paul. It's in the book. The word, Gospel is not English or Hebrew but a transliteration from the Greek the meaning of which is good news. There's lots of good news in the Bible : Noah and family not drowned, one father of Israel by which the World has been blessed and, of course the opportunity for deliverance from sins by love and power of God Himself. That the meaning of gospel in the NT has changed is evident and unarguably true. When we accept that God has changed a failed program for Jews to spread the gospel of the Kingdom to the World into one that accepts all believers in Christ into God's family. Read Romans for new program/gospel and Acts for the description of the transition. Furthermore, While Jesus held himself up to be followed under Kingdom rules, Paul gave advice (after Jews rejected Jesus as resurrected Messiah) to follow him as he followed Jesus Christ. Certainly, much more realizable than to try to follow Jesus to the temple (now closed) to pay the temple tax or to walk on water or "heal them all". When we see the fact of the transition from Gospel of the Kingdom with extravagant promises of healings and guaranteed answers to prayer coupled with a works requirement, then LACK OF healings, answers to prayers, instant death for a lie to the Holy Ghost (Annanias and Saphira) are not problems for us to puzzle over. The instant death event is similar to the Law which demanded fatal stoning for a single violation of a Sabbath cessation violation. And the need for miracles as (failed) signs to Israel has been replaced with the less stringent demand Also note that those who disbelieve Paul's theology are, nevertheless, forced to refer to his letters in order to form a biblically based church: titles of officers, their qualifications and church practices. This seems hypocritical because the church as we know it is TOTALLY ABSENT from the gospel accounts of Jesus' life (favored by most preachers) while our Church life rules come from Paul's writings.
Read the first verse in James. Who is it written to? Hebrews. Who will be going through the Tribulation? Hebrews. It’s very important to understand dispensations. This is why it says in 2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” All the Word of God is for us, but it all doesn’t apply to us.
This professor seems to be misleading many readers. Not only with wrongly dividing the Word (and therefore misapplying it) but overlooking the changes God has impressed on Gospel (from general grace and from Kingdom to of Grace) Makes many sick of Christianity. I wonder how many his teachings have mislead and hurt by him and others. @@privatepilot4064
Amazing presentation! Truly unique and its overview of historical New testament individuals. Undoubtedly taking a lifetime of passion and the pursuit both in the written word as well as on the ground Archaeologist.
Notice that the words: “You are to go to James the just...” from saying #12 of the Gospel of Thomas are advice given in the present tense. This suggests an early authorship for the Gospel of Thomas. My reading of the Gospel of Thomas is that it supports a non-apocalyptic movement of living in the here and now. This message, it appears to me, is what Jesus originally taught and that James then continued. In the Gospel of Thomas, there's no mention of sin, resurrection or a coming judgment. This stuff appears to have been added to an earlier message and has come into the Bible through Quelle (I'm ready to argue) who borrows from and often corrupts Thomas' text to suit their apocalyptic program. I'd love to see anyone's evidence that I'm wrong about this, but the more I look and compare, the more I'm persuaded of it. Ahead of time, I thank you for your growth-promoting correction; otherwise, we can celebrate together this alternative way to freedom to which Thomas (and James) point. Peace. P.s.: It's fun to notice that Paul quotes Thomas Saying #17 at 1st Corinthians 2:9 and even says: “As it is written....” to introduce it. Looks like Thomas had to be written sometime before 50CE.
@@YaelSharon3410 Thanks for sharing this idea. I've heard that asserted by someone else too. Here's what makes me question it. Isaiah 64:4 uses some of the same words as Thomas #17, but only a few of them. Paul's words at 1 Corinthians 2:9 duplicate Thomas' words precisely though omitting one line). Isaiah 64 is a prayer for God's deliverance, which inserts a bit of flattery to encourage God's assistance. The prophet is bragging that “No one has ever seen any other God do anything comparable to the amazing things You have done for us! So You can deliver us again, if You are but willing.” is how I understand that passage. The promise of being given an unspeakable gift, the point being made by Thomas and quoted by Paul, is totally absent in the Isaiah passage. I would enjoy hearing your thoughts. Peace.
Thank you for your insight. I have a multitude of questions regarding this theology and would very much appreciate your insight. I believe Paul was so successful at usurping the Christian mythology because he was selling a free pass (so to speak) into "heaven" based on faith exclusively. This would have gone over very well with both Jews and polytheism as both required a great deal of effort (rules and regulations etc). The second reason is totally my own conspiracy theory in which, Paul was a Roman, Roman's grip on Jerusalem, Damascus... Isreal/Judah was tenuous and therefore the Romans actually implanted/supported Paul to difuse the Jewish/Messianic Jewish movement.... Any thoughts on this would be most appreciated.
Faithfull: Thanks for sharing your thoughts. As you say, with Paul's ministry, people were being offered a ticket to heaven based on faith alone. The simplicity of that approach would have a lot of appeal, especially for any potential converts with no familiarity of the Jewish traditions. Paul's success at winning over converts was in large part due to his target audience. The synagogues were places of conversation and learning which welcomed and attracted non-Jews, gentiles seeking understanding and spiritual edification. Paul's preaching and ministry throughout the empire cherry-picked these “God fearers” away from their synagogues and he thus swelled the ranks of his movement with gentiles who were at the margins of Judaism. I can see how Paul could look like an agent of Rome assigned with a mission to neutralize Judaism. Clearly, the movement Paul started had become totally Romanized and un-Jewish within a generation of his preaching. Here's the thing though. Paul is believed to have been executed in the year 64 CE after a ministry of about 25 years or so. The Jesus movement was just getting started with Paul and was still totally undefined. Rome didn't even notice it. It's those rebellious Jews that were Rome's chronic problem. In the year 68 CE, Rome's solution to the Jewish problem, always favoring the direct over the subtle, was to send over ten legions of soldiers to Israel to wipe Judaism off the face off the earth. They destroyed the temple and decimated the population with over 500,000 perishing in Jerusalem alone. So in a very real sense, both Christianity and post-temple Judaism were born new at this same moment in history. Judaism was tolerated by the Romans because it was recognized to have standing as an ancient religion. Christianity survived by being Roman. Peace@@ObjectiveEthics
I arose from darkness, knowing my origin, and destiny. And darkness spoke: "Proceed no futher, transgressor!" Why? In what, have I sinned against you? Darkness replied: "In that my kingdom is a kingdom of darkness, and no one who lights the torch of knowledge is permitted here! Now, let us extinguish your painful light, that all may return to the peaceful sleep of ignorance." No darkness! Those who sleep your sleep do so only because they are first ignorant of your guile. But of this the savior has warned me. I arise thus, eluding the force of darkness and rejoice to be free from that of worldly ignorance. I arise from Desire, that which causes the natures to mix, and which seeks to awaken in the fleeing soul a fondness those false delights of lignt that it left behind on Earth, so that it might return there. Desire speaks: "Who are you, and whence came you?" I am of the seed of the living Father and do not belong to this world- hinder me not! As I seek but to return to the place from I once came. "I never saw you decending, but now I behold you ascending- what makes you LIE? You are mine!" I saw you, but you did not see me or notice me. You saw nothing but my vesture, and you did not know me. I arise from Ignorance "Where do you think you are going? Do you deserve to enter heaven? In the chains of wickedness you were captive! You are a prisoner, you dare not judge me!" And who are you to judge me so? I have not condemned you. In truth, I was chained to the flesh, though now I am free. I was not recognized. But I have come to recognize that the All is being deconstructed. Both the Earthly elements, and the heavenly ones. I arise to the 4th power, which assumes 7 likenesses: the likeness of the 7 powers: 1-Darkness 2-Desire 3-Ignorance 4-Terror of Death 5-The reign of the Flesh 6-Deluded wisdom of the Flesh 7-The Vengeance of Wisdom These are the 7 wrathful powers. "Whence come you, murderer? Where are you headed, space traveler?" What held me captive has indeed been killed. And what enveloped me has been defeated. And my desire has been extinguished, and ignorance has expired. In the midst of a world I was set free from a world. And freed from a pattern of death, I recieved deliverance from a heavenly prototype; deliverance from the chain of oblivion which passes away. Hence forward, I shall win my way to that repose where no one speaks of time, of season, of age!
I’m not persuaded by Dr. Tabor but his posit is at least possible and plausible. With Crossan at the other end, he book-ends the possibilities, and makes the reading of the Gospels and the invention and early history of Christianity far more interesting. For the historical Jesus and that invention, Dr. Tabor is a breathe of fresh air and makes the whole thing both interesting and challenging again.
The Early Xtians ➡️ Jamesian Sect - Peter and JC's siblings Jude and James taught "The Religion of JC" which is Repentance/Renewal -Judaism. Heavily influenced by Zealotic and Essenic Jewish Philosophies. "Grace by Deed" * James was the sibling of JC, and James was a Common Jew, by the assumption of accounts he and his siblings were observant of Judaism. ➡️ Paulian Sect - Paul taught "The Religion about JC" . Heavily focused on "Messiahnic Deitification and Mysticism" as well as "Greco-Roman Cultural Amalgamation of the Jewish Messiahnic Mysticism" "Grace by Creed" * Paul was Saul of Tarsus a Greco-Roman Citizen of Jewish Diasporan Decent. He was raised, grew up and educated in Proto-Pagan Alexandria.
Awesome video. Is this reading from an audioboook or something akin? Or just something you pre-wrote for this video? If it is an audiobook I’d love to know what book. Or if it’s part of a playlist you’ve created with other videos just like this on your RUclips channel, I’d also love to know that, I love this style of vid. Thanks for your fascinating work
i've wondered if the way James died had anything to do with the story Jesus told, that Satan took him to the highest part of the temple and told him to throw himself down and, if he were really the messiah, angels would catch him. Then, didn't they throw james off of a high part of the temple? Like they were taunting him, let's see if that will work for you.
As the brother of the dead anointed one, did James assume the title of potential Davidic ruler? Did he preach that now it was his responsibility to do the political and supernatural duties of a Messiah, or was there a James version of second coming?
In the book of Thomas..The disciples said to Jesus, " We understand that you will depart from us.Who will guide us?".. Jesus replied to them, " Wherever you are, go to James the Just, for the sake of whom heaven and earth emerged."
Wow, James! This is fantastic. I'll go back to the videos you did around this same time and hopefully find more info. Is this from a particular one of your books? I need to acquire it.
Rome couldn't arrest Jesus and disciples, as Rome did immediately for other false claimants, because when Rome initially tried to arrest Jesus, they were immobilized. Secondly, because there was a Roman occupation of Judea, the Jewish authorities couldn't openly proclaim Jesus the Messiah, which they knew He was because the Romans couldn't arrest Jesus.
Is it possible that they chose Luke and Acts, knowing that they down played James and the rest of Jesus's family as a way to protect the family line in some way? Though maybe not...what ya think?
yes bc later with Polycarp among many other's who walked with the true 12 apostles, who would have followed more closely to James' message of Christ, insisted the feast day of passover be kept on it's traditional Jewish calendar he is overruled and it is changed to remove themselves from Jewish tradition. Paul didn't speak much about the abolishment of such festivals as we have some evidence that he still observed them in his own letters, BUT the early apostolic fathers such as Eusebius by the 300's staunchly rejected anything "jewish" or what we would call 1st century Messianic church and these same people who wanted to change the festivals also heavily favored Paul's theology.
Having read the outstanding calloway book on consecration to st. Joseph, I think I would "go to st. Joseph. " St. James should take precedence over the popular st. Jude though .
In my seventh time of returning to Yehovah God and Yeshua ha Messiach I found in James 4:7-10 to be the true understanding and knowledge of a return that showed to be true with the evidence of the devil running away from me and his sin that he loans and even teaches how to multiply the sin even runs away with him This teaching of James is not just a read but a physical doing , standing and submitting yourself to Yehovah God, resisting the devil and knowing the heart is now cleansed and the hands are washed, drawing near to the Father and the Father drawing near to you, humbling yourself and waiting for our Father to lift you up, resisting the devil is telling him that he is no longer your father or cruel slave master and that you are no longer his son or ignorant slave, the Spirit of holiness will be present and this is what causes the devil to run and your name written in the heavens
I would be interested to know what Dr Tabor would think about the idea that Jesus (and his family at the helm of the movement) were based on (or modeled after in story form) Judah of Galilee, his family, the fourth philosophy and what eventually became known as zealots. Making the first generation christians firmly zealots. I find that theory highly interesting.
@@paulallenscards That's too bad. I find the whole "composite Jesus" as something very worthy of taking a look see. As being more historically representative of a movement than one single man. Very intriguing theory. Not straight myth but not straight history either. Best of both worlds lol
@@Vina_Ravyn I agree that it’s a very intriguing conversation. But in purview of the current scholarly consensus, the subject too far from the realm of plausibility for most to explore it any deeper than the textual records otherwise indicate.
@@paulallenscards That's far too bad. Seems to me the textual records offers us multiple stories that indicate that Jesus is mainly used for theological proofs more than historical accuracy. I think even Dr Tabor would agree with that. I do think the fundamentalism in scholarship is kinda funny considering how far outside the box the New Testament is opposed to what the Jewish scriptures say. It was worth a shot. ;)
@@Vina_Ravyn - I think at the very least there is some influence. You might be interested in a paper (open access) recommended by Dr Samuel Zinner recently - here is the citation: Bermejo-Rubio, Fernando. "Jesus and the Anti-Roman Resistance", Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 12, 1-2 (2014):1-105.
the Jerusalem council decision from what i understand whats because Moses os taught every sabbath so the 4 things cmvert do its the beginning while they learn Mosaic law.
Many people are waking up to the fact that Christanity was let astray for two millennia by following the teachings of Paul who never met the living historical Jesus, was not one of his original disciples, and seemed not to know much about his sayings and teachings as evidenced by his epistles. He invented theology and Christology that historical Jesus never preached. Is it any wonder that he was at odds with James and early church in Jerusalem?
@@Jason-vf2mj I think James Tabor has a video lecture where he shows that "The Way" terminology was more of an Essene belief and terminology. I could be remembering this wrong, but maybe someone with a better study of this can comment.
Great video! I am curious why you think Mark was a Jew? His gospel is high level greek, and in chapter 7 he has to explain to his audience about ritual purity, and he gets a lot wrong.
James the Just: I am the true successor of Jesus Peter & Paul (and a Mary wannabe): Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee.
The Council of Ephesus in AD 431 decreed that Mary is the Theotokos "God-bearer" because Her Son Jesus is both God and man: one divine person from two natures (divine and human) intimately and hypostatically united. The title of Mother of God or Mother of Incarnate God; is most often used in English, largely due to the lack of a satisfactory equivalent of the Greek τόκος. For the same reason, the title is often left untranslated, as "Theotokos", in Orthodox liturgical usage of other languages. The title has been in use since the 3rd century, in the Syriac tradition. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theotokos
James' the Just succession, or one of biggest cover-ups of Christian history. Eisenmann's book is interesting but such a tedious read and so confuse. If you have other recommandé books about James Mr Tabor? Thanks.
In the book of Thomas, Jesus tells His apostles to follow James the Just, for the Heavens and earth was created for His sake. It's hard to understand what he meant by that. It sounds to me that James was either God Himself, or a very important prophet Edit: the name James means supplanter and/or substitute
These are interesting. So am I led to believe that a lineage of Jesus's family descendants are still walking amongst us currently? How come the Beatles get all the attention?? Where are they and why don't they say hi. Maybe they don't know who they are. Where would they be, what continent, country, state, town, house. I will believe it, take it or leave it, when I see it.
I understand where you are coming from Michael Jeremy, I think the whole world would like to just be told the truth, it feels like a battle at times. I was brought up as a Catholic, as I got older I didn’t like their strictness, and money seemed more important than faith. I never enjoyed school as a child, and felt bullied by their rules, one thing that i find odd now is that we weren’t taught much about the bible, there was never a bible in my home. A few years ago I felt the need to research, and learn as much as I could about Jesus, God, and the bloodline, there are lot’s of theories, conspiracies, some sound crazy, some evil, but I do believe if there were, or are, they would probably face great danger. Just my opinion of course, the Devinci Code for an example.
It's an interesting perspective and it certainly does seem clear that James was leader of Jesus movement after his death. What's less clear is why. In addition to Luke minimizing his role in Acts, did all the Gospel writers basically take him out of their stories? Or was he truly not particularly involved in the movement before Jesus's death? In the modern world, where we put less emphasis on blood ties, is there any reason to think that James was the best person to carry on Jesus's teachings? That he had the best understanding of the message? And as a side note, you emphasize Jesus (and thus James) as a descendant of David and thus of the royal line. Is there any evidence of that as a belief in the earliest days? IIRC, it's introduced in two different forms by Luke and Matthew, but the lineage isn't given in Mark. Or mentioned by Paul.
I think your suggestion regarding James being the leader of the Jesus movement is right on. The authors of the canonical gospels wrote James out of their accounts because they belonged to a different and later faction of the movement which never acknowledged James' authority. They had an apocalyptic message not shared by James. Luke (Acts) delivers his apocalyptic message through Peter on Pentecost. In my view, Peter got the message wrong, running around warning everyone to save themselves from God's imminent coming judgment. I noticed that after Jesus called Peter “Satan” for seeking the will of men over God, Peter is never reinstated by Jesus. (I know, John sees the problem and gives him a 'presidential pardon' for history's sake some 30 years later.) But notice that Peter never changed nor did he relent in his message “seeking the will of men and not of God”, for which Jesus had rebuked him. James was the acknowledged leader of the Jerusalem group until his assassination in 62 CE. But none of the four canonical gospels was written before 70 CE, following James' death. So, from James to the canonical gospels represents the passage of a full generation of developmental changes in the Jesus movement. It went from “The kingdom of heaven is within you.” to warning of the coming “blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke”. I like the original (non-apocalyptic) message the best. I welcome your thoughts of my ponderings. Peace.
@@neilhundtoft4873 If James was as important as it appears then I highly doubt he would have allowed a right-hand man(Peter) to be someone Jesus did not approve of.
But everyone, both good and bad, serves God's purpose. Judas Iscariot was also chosen by Jesus to be an apostle even though Jesus knew full well he would betray him. And so, Jesus chose Peter, the rock, to further Jesus' purpose by having him found a church. Jesus accommodates what the people wanted. But of course it is the rock the builders rejected, which is Jesus and not Peter or the church, who is the true cornerstone of faith. Right after Peter confesses Jesus to be the messiah, Jesus rebukes Peter for promoting men's purposes over God's. Peter wanted a Davidic king to retsore Jewish independence from Rome. At Matthew 16:23, Jesus tells us what he thinks of this idea. “Get behind me Satan, for you are a stumbling block to me!” The Greek word in verse 23 is σκάνδαλον (skandalon), which means a stumbling block. Although Jesus called Peter a rock, he tells us he means that Peter, (and his church) are actually a stumbling-block, an impediment, to coming to the truth, not its foundation. So it is is with the organized church. The church was founded, on purpose by Jesus, as a phase and full of error, as the kindergarten of our education in faith. It is a place for us to grow through as we come to learn our true identity apart from any organized religion. This view has also given me a way to understand Saying #40. “A grapevine has been planted outside the father, but being unsound, it will be uprooted and perish.” We are provided our education by the church, and then, those of us who seek it, graduate. We develop and grow from yielding 60 per measure to 120 per measure. Peace and light to all.@@Dragonfly20233
Get truth from the Bible. James does not appear early in leadership because he was an unbeliever (explained in the gospels) until Jesus' Passion. But by Acts 15, Peter was already subordinate to James who by then believed in Jesus.. As church leader, the Holy Ghost (thru Paul) replaced the Apostles after the failure of the Pentecostal, Jerusalem church. Paul's set of house churches then propagated the of grace.
@@edwardwalsh5477 I'd be careful of your trust in Paul. Rev 2 Jesus talks about the false apostle who comes and how they did a good job running him off. Paul himself states that he never preaches anywhere the word has already been preached. So we know he was the only one at the early church in Ephesus and ironically in Acts we have the story about how Paul was run out of Ephesus and they tried to stone him for the heresy of his message.
@@Dragonfly20233 You are amazing! Few people have been so brazen as to warn AGAINST a writer of the Bible! Usually, it's just benign neglect that causes their ignorance. A) St. Paul is recognized by PETER (2 Pt 3:15-16) as a brother and for his extraordinary wisdom yet not easy to understand (for Peter - remember how Peter resisted the directive by God to go into Cornelius' house - and for many leading theologians of today also. B) It's a widespread problem in Christian leaders and here too that none seems to understand that God has changed His expectations (rules, if you will) several time in scripture. Careful bible study with an eye to such changes would be earthshaking to many ignorant teachers. God created the heaven and earth but later on drowned all but 8 souls in a worldwide flood. Major change! 2) When the world became corrupt again, he shifted from coverage of world to give attention to Abraham and his offspring (called Israel and fills most of the Bible) because he started a different plan; salvation of the willing in the world by the few (Israel). I believe that the Revelation passage you cite occurs after the close of the dispensation in which we live - the dispensation of Grace (as opposed to that of LAW or Conscience)- AND after Rome had chopped Paul's head from his body. (home at last) C) "Paul was run out of Ephesus and they tried to stone him for the heresy of his message." I don't know how you got the idea that the violence against Paul in Ephesus was motivated by theology. It was nothing of the sort. It was caused there as it was in Acts 16:19 for loss of evil trade resulting in economic loss to the tradesmen. Not to say that Paul never suffered for preaching of his gospel (the latest one offered by God thru the risen Christ) the gospel of the grace of God. All prior gospel (of the Kingdom) required conformity to the Law of Moses AND faith that God would forgive after the propter sacrifice. But that was debated in Acts 15 and settled there with Peter's conclusion (15:11) that Paul and Barnabus should continue to preach what was clearly effective in winning Gentiles (AND NOW JEWS) to God thru Christ's blood - hardly mentioned by any other Jewish writer because the Church had been only in God's mind (not in prophesy) from before the world began. Studying the Gospels which relate mostly precross events, causes ignorance about the true nature of the Church (body of Christ) and its mission and the powerful role that it plays (empowered by the universal, permanent indwelling of God's Holy Spirit in members) in redeeming the wiling of the world from sin and perdition. C) This presentation is a prime example of confused thinkers who overlook the changing methods and expectations of the Creator. Do continue study using a concordance to locate the "time - related" phrases to get clarification of the CHANGES that God has brought to this world "in order to save some"!
"Follow Cemukay, who has over one hundred videos on Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Everything is discussed openly, to the point and without bias. You won’t find videos like these…
Bet you didnt know this James( kind of ironic that your name is James too)...I'am in Alcoholics Annonymous for 22 years. One of the founders Dr. Bob Smith was a Christian man along with his wife . He paid so much attention to the Book of James in the bible, when writing the Big Book of AA, That the original name for AA was almost called...The James Club" Now Dr. William JAMES was the biggest influence to the other AA founder Bill Wilson. He had nothing to do with the book of James, I just thought it was interesting that his last name is James. Some believe thathe book of James was written by a Stoic, but thats a whole different rabbit hole. I also heard it may have been...Marcion of Sinope.
James has always been my favorite book in the Bible. It gets right down to the basics of Christianity. Its like looking into a mirror. Self reflection. 😊
Was driving through my local town last week and saw a rainbow over a church dedicated to St James. It really stood out and today I came across this video.
I’m only now (age 74) beginning to understand the important place James the Just should have in the history of Christianity. Thank you Prof. Tabor!
Well sir, in another month I turn 79 and I am sharing with you this terrific discovery of James, Jesus' brother. I've been spending a lot of time with the Gospel of Thomas in the process. It seems to me that because it recommends going to James about questions, the text of the Gospel of Thomas must itself reflect what James was saying and promoting. Because of that, I'm feeling like the Gospel of Thomas is the place for me to learn more about James' thinking. That is proving fruitful to me. In any case, the best to you in your continued studies and ponderings. Peace. Neil
@@neilhundtoft4873 God Bless you. Continue praying to God directly like Jesus did. Thete is only One God
The book of James is talking to the twelve tribes, James 1:1 James a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad. Jesus sent apostle Paul to preach the gospel for us today in the dispensation of grace. The gospel of our salvation is found in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4. Ephesians 2:8-9. 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workmen that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. We’re not Isreal, we’re the body of Christ. Praise the Lord our God for his grace, mercy and peace.
If james take place in christian hystory there will no pauline christians
@@Ibelievethegospel The only person who sent Paul to teach to the gentiles was Paul. You can't use someone's claiming of authority as the authority. Paul claimed authority no one else gave him. He claimed apostleship to the Cor believers but the true apostles only called him a brother. The gentiles were given to Peter so there was no need for Paul to come in and "clarify" Jesus' message. Jesus didn't stutter. He was quite clear in His command that ONLY the 12 apostles had the judicial authority on matters of His church and Paul didn't even come on the scene until nearly 10 years later with a "vision" that can not be supported by anyone. The people with him said they saw that Paul was seeing something but they neither heard nor saw anything themself. Paul probably thought he was doing the Lord's work but he clearly was in NO place of authority from Christ so take his interpretations through the lens of a third hand source and don't ignore those who had first hand sources with Jesus...unless you believe that Jesus sat out in the desert with Paul for 3 years and taught him(as Paul claims) even though Jesus said He would not return to the end of the age AND that the disciples and apostleships should be on guard for anyone claiming to be coming in his name from the desert(exactly where Paul came out of).
Yes, James says it all. Short and sweet, it tells us how we should think and act, how we should humble ourselves, help the needy, and to remind ourselves that our lives are like mists and flowers, soon to disappear. God be praised!
Ah, James Tabor talking about James the Just, that's what I'm here for!
James, just talking about James the just, is just what I wanted!
I have been interested in James’ place in Christianity and that of the family for many years, and have been aware of this discussion. It is, however, interesting to get James Tabor’s view on it and to confirm what I learned 20 years ago backed by updated information. When people ask me if I am a Christian, I often comment that I am more of a Jesus Christian than a Pauline Christian. If Jesus is God’s man on earth, and he is the way, the truth and the light, then why is most of the New Testament about Paul, who never knew or met Jesus while he was alive, spent perhaps a couple weeks with Peter and James, who did not take well to him, and was sent off to talk to the Gentiles, where he made up his own theology as he went along. I have always questioned if some of the texts attributed to Paul were written by or truly attributed to Paul. 2000 years later, it is very difficult to get close to the fountain of truth and knowledge concerning a the origins of Christianity. The Church certainly did spin it to a different advantage, which helped to control the masses for a very long time. These days many people have curiosity and want to get closer to truth. Christianity needs to be updated if it is to survive another 100 years, let alone 2000 years. Christian denominations break apart over some simple ideas, so that today there are between 43,000 and 45,000 denominations world wide.
There is no James the Just. There is James the Less.
@@lindaliestman4397 God Bless you
Same😂
I love learning from this man. I have a habit of researching things that I hear to determine truth. I learned quickly that it was a waste of time with Dr. Tabor. I never found anything he said to be wrong. He's even unbiased in his guesses in my opinion. I truly value his thoughts and opinions on anything in biblical history.
God has built us to search for truth
I absolutely agree with Eisenman. I think Paul took the movement in a new, and wrong, direction.
agreed, Paul was a Greek that tried to appease the Roman public and inserted proto-pagan beliefs to align Christianity more towards the tastes of the Roman populace
@@AR-tb9hq Paul was a Greek speaking Jew of the Tribe of Benjamin he was also a Roman citizen and a Pharisee. I have thought for a long time that he deliberately or otherwise led Christians astray. It’s frightening how many Christians quote his writings rather than the Four Gospels. It’s as if they don’t care to focus on Christ who after all told us he is the only way to the Father.
@@annwilson-rawi3760 four gospels? What exactly are the four gospels Matthew mark Luke John
Paul might have taken it in the wrong direction but who's to say that Christianity would have survived under James's right direction? Paul spread Christianity to the Gentiles maybe under James it would have only remained a Jewish movement much like the Samaritans. Say what you want against Paul but even in his flawed sort of way he made Jesus known to the world.
Absolutely agree
Truthful Kindness here. I have been very interested in “James the Just” for about 15 years. THANKS for further addressing this topic.
If you have researched it for 15 years, then you probably already know about this one. But for the sake of those who may not yet know about this book from Robert H. Eisenman:
"James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls Paperback - March 1, 1998"
@shanejohns7901 Ooooh thanks for the recommendation. I just ordered it.
Most, and I do mean most, Christians do not want to follow Jesus, they want to worship Jesus, it’s just easier!
And that's the difference. James was about following, and Paul was about believing.
Great comment! I must remember that one
Nicely put!
@Wholly_His One who takes the entirety of their being that is to become or to behold. places it on a path of desired achievement /attainment. they are becoming what is meant as a warship. hopefully in the direction of right action, devineitive ...balanced emotions, full of desire love, only to navigate around distraction.......maby?¿
O'buan...
Including you.
Your scholarship is just amazingly great.
Continue with the Non Bias Narrative.
Even us Muslim are attracted by it.
We love you for the sake of Allah.
Peace be upon you.
❤️
Incredible brother! Your research and study has definitely payed off. Wow. Crazy to think that Jesus as well as his Family were actually all royalty. Blessings 🙏
As a convert to Islam from Paulianity. Your work is phenomenal and reinforces my faith. Thankyou for your unapologetic truthfulness and helping us understand the true Jesus
please know islam was made about 600 years after the resurection of YAHUSHA (JESUS) and also Muhammed try commiting suicide after visitation from the suppose angel Gabriel.
which leads me to belive it wasent the angel Gabriel that visited Muhammed but it was satan himself masquerading as a angel of light to decieve Muhammed to make islam to conquer the world.
If you realize the murderer Paul is false why do you accept the murderer Mohammad?
Islam teaches that Jesus was not even crucified at all.
also i dont think of jesus would endorse a warlord and pfile (looking at u too prosperity gospel preaching warlord evangelicals .. was a wae@@ChristinaFromRUclips
@@ChristinaFromRUclipsGospel of Basilides, letters of Ignatius of Antioch refuting early Christians who believed Jesus did not die, Hebrews 5:7 corresponding to Jesus’ cry to be saved when he was being crucified, some Gnostic texts say Simon of Cyrene replaced Jesus on the cross.
This shows that the Islamic position is not foreign to even Christianity.
@@T-19- Jesus died and was raised from the dead by YHVH because the promise is that those who do not sin will live.
Death could not hold the sinless man even when he was murdered because he was without sin and YHVH keeps his promise that the righteous will not die.
This just boosted my faith in Islam, these historical and „hidden“ facts are important and align perfectly with my faith. Praise be to God 💞
"align perfectly" bruh, Ebionites teach that Jesus had a father, Joseph. Ebionites taught vegetarian kashrut(all vegetables are pareve anyway)
Your Quran says that Isa had no father and also created birds from clay(taken from Gnostics)
@@demonking86420
half true. there were at 2 sects of the Ebonites.
one group thought Jesus was born of both Joseph and Mary and they other thought he was born of the holy spirit and Mary.
PRAISE JESUS! He wanted TEAM MEMBERS not a fan club! Huge difference! Not as many saved as they think they are! Repent and seek his words for they are your only chance at SALVATION and ETERNAL LIFE! ❤❤❤
Thanks, Dr. Tabor. Thanks for looking deeply into the text as though through a glass darkly. Thank you.
Popped up on my youtube and I'm delighted! Excellent, it seems fake news goes back a long way! Subscribed and looking forward to your other videos : )
Excellent video. Speaking of how "the church" reacted ... it became a cult. The book of Acts makes that abundantly clear. The story of Ananias and Saphira. Dr. Tabor, you should cover that one. Most definitely.
Makes me wonder how after being raised by a devout dad and having to attend church every Sunday, as well as religious instructions once a week, that I have never understood one damn bit of any of this.
Just keep in mind that it was written to the 12 tribes of Israel. James 1:1 “James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.”
Would you be more clear in what your statement is alluding to here by saying "Just remember"... thanks!
@@Dragonfly20233 All Scripture is for us, but all Scripture is not about us.
Thank you Dr Tabor for anther excellent video.
Acts 15 makes it clear that JAMES was making the decisions.
"find James and you find Jesus" Robert eisenman
Absolutely agree. So called Christians are following Paul and the church. They are deluded and misled
I only recently, but maybe the last 5-7 years actually started reading my bible. I had been raised in a Baptist church and went into volunteer ministry with the youth's. In reading (over and over), I couldn't help but see the different message that it seemed Paul was bringing than that of what Jesus was teaching. And that the book of James and even 1st John were so similar to what Jesus said. Paul's writing seems to have created a very diverse and argumentative foundation for our beliefs. Something sinister or intentional may be the reason for so much of the "Christian faith" following what Paul wrote. Scary.
Sorry for the failure of your spiritual leaders to convey to you what the Bible clearly teaches of which they may be ignorant. My comment below should help a lot. The Berean Bible Society has multiple booklets and online pubs that provide detailed explanations for what I present abbreviated below.
CHURCH FAILURES
Sorry for the all too frequent disparagement of St. Paul and his message despite the obvious (to the discerning reader) supersession (NOT DISTORTION) of the Gospel of the Kingdom (works + faith) by Paul's message of faith in Jesus alone I Cor. 15:1-4. The timing of Paul's message follows the failures (Acts 1-8) of the Gospel of the Kingdom group: financial depletion, Apostles remaining in Jerusalem (not "to all the world") and limited gospel distribution just to Jews Acts 8) and then only by Jewish refugees expelled by Rome to Cyprus, and other locations outside of Israel.
INTERPRETATIONS OF LITERATURE
As with all writings and rules, the most recent ones are the ones to follow. We don't view every of the deceased to properly administer an estate just the most recent. Paul's Gospel of Grace is the most recent and what we should follow until Jesus returns.
Even this professor doesn't seem to get it because, James' theme clearly adds works to God's demands in contrast to the "wholly by Grace" theme (not under the Law - Rom 6) delivered to Saul outside of Israel by Jesus Christ himself in a vision to Paul. It's in the book. The word, Gospel is not English or Hebrew but a transliteration from the Greek the meaning of which is good news. There's lots of good news in the Bible : Noah and family not drowned, one father of Israel by which the World has been blessed and, of course the opportunity for deliverance from sins by love and power of God Himself.
That the meaning of gospel in the NT has changed is evident and unarguably true. When we accept that God has changed a failed program for Jews to spread the gospel of the Kingdom to the World into one that accepts all believers in Christ into God's family. Read Romans for new program/gospel and Acts for the description of the transition.
Furthermore, While Jesus held himself up to be followed under Kingdom rules, Paul gave advice (after Jews rejected Jesus as resurrected Messiah) to follow him as he followed Jesus Christ. Certainly, much more realizable than to try to follow Jesus to the temple (now closed) to pay the temple tax or to walk on water or "heal them all".
When we see the fact of the transition from Gospel of the Kingdom with extravagant promises of healings and guaranteed answers to prayer coupled with a works requirement, then LACK OF healings, answers to prayers, instant death for a lie to the Holy Ghost (Annanias and Saphira) are not problems for us to puzzle over. The instant death event is similar to the Law which demanded fatal stoning for a single violation of a Sabbath cessation violation. And the need for miracles as (failed) signs to Israel has been replaced with the less stringent demand
Also note that those who disbelieve Paul's theology are, nevertheless, forced to refer to his letters in order to form a biblically based church: titles of officers, their qualifications and church practices. This seems hypocritical because the church as we know it is TOTALLY ABSENT from the gospel accounts of Jesus' life (favored by most preachers) while our Church life rules come from Paul's writings.
Read the first verse in James. Who is it written to? Hebrews. Who will be going through the Tribulation? Hebrews. It’s very important to understand dispensations. This is why it says in 2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” All the Word of God is for us, but it all doesn’t apply to us.
This professor seems to be misleading many readers. Not only with wrongly dividing the Word (and therefore misapplying it) but overlooking the changes God has impressed on Gospel (from general grace and from Kingdom to of Grace) Makes many sick of Christianity.
I wonder how many his teachings have mislead and hurt by him and others. @@privatepilot4064
The fact to separate Jesus family from him is to make Jesus a divine person and link him to God's family. .
Justice is the one real truth. I loved James for that. 😁
Dr Tabor. I really enjoy your reading!! Ty
Amazing presentation! Truly unique and its overview of historical New testament individuals. Undoubtedly taking a lifetime of passion and the pursuit both in the written word as well as on the ground Archaeologist.
Gospel according to James Tabor ❤
Yeah ..... that's right .......... Acts should be retitled "Mostly the Adventures of Paul".
James The Just ❤️🔑❤️
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Right
Very interesting. Thank you Dr Tabor
Notice that the words: “You are to go to James the just...” from saying #12 of the Gospel of Thomas are advice given in the present tense. This suggests an early authorship for the Gospel of Thomas. My reading of the Gospel of Thomas is that it supports a non-apocalyptic movement of living in the here and now. This message, it appears to me, is what Jesus originally taught and that James then continued. In the Gospel of Thomas, there's no mention of sin, resurrection or a coming judgment. This stuff appears to have been added to an earlier message and has come into the Bible through Quelle (I'm ready to argue) who borrows from and often corrupts Thomas' text to suit their apocalyptic program. I'd love to see anyone's evidence that I'm wrong about this, but the more I look and compare, the more I'm persuaded of it. Ahead of time, I thank you for your growth-promoting correction; otherwise, we can celebrate together this alternative way to freedom to which Thomas (and James) point. Peace.
P.s.: It's fun to notice that Paul quotes Thomas Saying #17 at 1st Corinthians 2:9 and even says: “As it is written....” to introduce it. Looks like Thomas had to be written sometime before 50CE.
Thomas saying #17 and 1 Corinthians 2:9 is quote from Isaiah 64:4
@@YaelSharon3410 Thanks for sharing this idea. I've heard that asserted by someone else too. Here's what makes me question it. Isaiah 64:4 uses some of the same words as Thomas #17, but only a few of them. Paul's words at 1 Corinthians 2:9 duplicate Thomas' words precisely though omitting one line). Isaiah 64 is a prayer for God's deliverance, which inserts a bit of flattery to encourage God's assistance. The prophet is bragging that “No one has ever seen any other God do anything comparable to the amazing things You have done for us! So You can deliver us again, if You are but willing.” is how I understand that passage. The promise of being given an unspeakable gift, the point being made by Thomas and quoted by Paul, is totally absent in the Isaiah passage. I would enjoy hearing your thoughts. Peace.
Thank you for your insight. I have a multitude of questions regarding this theology and would very much appreciate your insight.
I believe Paul was so successful at usurping the Christian mythology because he was selling a free pass (so to speak) into "heaven" based on faith exclusively. This would have gone over very well with both Jews and polytheism as both required a great deal of effort (rules and regulations etc).
The second reason is totally my own conspiracy theory in which, Paul was a Roman, Roman's grip on Jerusalem, Damascus... Isreal/Judah was tenuous and therefore the Romans actually implanted/supported Paul to difuse the Jewish/Messianic Jewish movement....
Any thoughts on this would be most appreciated.
Faithfull: Thanks for sharing your thoughts. As you say, with Paul's ministry, people were being offered a ticket to heaven based on faith alone. The simplicity of that approach would have a lot of appeal, especially for any potential converts with no familiarity of the Jewish traditions. Paul's success at winning over converts was in large part due to his target audience. The synagogues were places of conversation and learning which welcomed and attracted non-Jews, gentiles seeking understanding and spiritual edification. Paul's preaching and ministry throughout the empire cherry-picked these “God fearers” away from their synagogues and he thus swelled the ranks of his movement with gentiles who were at the margins of Judaism. I can see how Paul could look like an agent of Rome assigned with a mission to neutralize Judaism. Clearly, the movement Paul started had become totally Romanized and un-Jewish within a generation of his preaching. Here's the thing though. Paul is believed to have been executed in the year 64 CE after a ministry of about 25 years or so. The Jesus movement was just getting started with Paul and was still totally undefined. Rome didn't even notice it. It's those rebellious Jews that were Rome's chronic problem. In the year 68 CE, Rome's solution to the Jewish problem, always favoring the direct over the subtle, was to send over ten legions of soldiers to Israel to wipe Judaism off the face off the earth. They destroyed the temple and decimated the population with over 500,000 perishing in Jerusalem alone. So in a very real sense, both Christianity and post-temple Judaism were born new at this same moment in history. Judaism was tolerated by the Romans because it was recognized to have standing as an ancient religion. Christianity survived by being Roman. Peace@@ObjectiveEthics
I arose from darkness, knowing my origin, and destiny.
And darkness spoke:
"Proceed no futher, transgressor!"
Why? In what, have I sinned against you?
Darkness replied:
"In that my kingdom is a kingdom of darkness, and no one who lights the torch of knowledge is permitted here! Now, let us extinguish your painful light, that all may return to the peaceful sleep of ignorance."
No darkness! Those who sleep your sleep do so only because they are first ignorant of your guile. But of this the savior has warned me.
I arise thus, eluding the force of darkness and rejoice to be free from that of worldly ignorance.
I arise from Desire, that which causes the natures to mix, and which seeks to awaken in the fleeing soul a fondness those false delights of lignt that it left behind on Earth, so that it might return there.
Desire speaks:
"Who are you, and whence came you?"
I am of the seed of the living Father and do not belong to this world- hinder me not! As I seek but to return to the place from I once came.
"I never saw you decending, but now I behold you ascending- what makes you LIE? You are mine!"
I saw you, but you did not see me or notice me. You saw nothing but my vesture, and you did not know me.
I arise from Ignorance
"Where do you think you are going? Do you deserve to enter heaven? In the chains of wickedness you were captive! You are a prisoner, you dare not judge me!"
And who are you to judge me so? I have not condemned you. In truth, I was chained to the flesh, though now I am free. I was not recognized. But I have come to recognize that the All is being deconstructed. Both the Earthly elements, and the heavenly ones.
I arise to the 4th power, which assumes 7 likenesses: the likeness of the 7 powers:
1-Darkness
2-Desire
3-Ignorance
4-Terror of Death
5-The reign of the Flesh
6-Deluded wisdom of the Flesh
7-The Vengeance of Wisdom
These are the 7 wrathful powers.
"Whence come you, murderer? Where are you headed, space traveler?"
What held me captive has indeed been killed. And what enveloped me has been defeated. And my desire has been extinguished, and ignorance has expired. In the midst of a world I was set free from a world. And freed from a pattern of death, I recieved deliverance from a heavenly prototype; deliverance from the chain of oblivion which passes away. Hence forward, I shall win my way to that repose where no one speaks of time, of season, of age!
Love this Dr. James Tabor, where's the part 2?
Enjoyed very much.
Sounds like a hit piece.
I’m not persuaded by Dr. Tabor but his posit is at least possible and plausible. With Crossan at the other end, he book-ends the possibilities, and makes the reading of the Gospels and the invention and early history of Christianity far more interesting. For the historical Jesus and that invention, Dr. Tabor is a breathe of fresh air and makes the whole thing both interesting and challenging again.
The Early Xtians
➡️ Jamesian Sect - Peter and JC's siblings Jude and James taught "The Religion of JC" which is Repentance/Renewal -Judaism.
Heavily influenced by Zealotic and Essenic Jewish Philosophies.
"Grace by Deed"
* James was the sibling of JC, and James was a Common Jew, by the assumption of accounts he and his siblings were observant of Judaism.
➡️ Paulian Sect - Paul taught "The Religion about JC" .
Heavily focused on "Messiahnic Deitification and Mysticism" as well as "Greco-Roman Cultural Amalgamation of the Jewish Messiahnic Mysticism"
"Grace by Creed"
* Paul was Saul of Tarsus a Greco-Roman Citizen of Jewish Diasporan Decent. He was raised, grew up and educated in Proto-Pagan Alexandria.
Awesome analysis Sir.
Do you have any interpretation for Satan little season and is possible we are in it? Thank you
Awesome video. Is this reading from an audioboook or something akin? Or just something you pre-wrote for this video? If it is an audiobook I’d love to know what book. Or if it’s part of a playlist you’ve created with other videos just like this on your RUclips channel, I’d also love to know that, I love this style of vid. Thanks for your fascinating work
Part 2! Part 2!
Thank you for sharing.
1.00 to 2.00 don't forget that 'ruach ha kodesh" ( Holy Spirit) also played an important invisible part. John 16.7
Absolutely! I had the same thought. After Pentecost, the miracles healings, etc showed that it was clear that this was of God!
i've wondered if the way James died had anything to do with the story Jesus told, that Satan took him to the highest part of the temple and told him to throw himself down and, if he were really the messiah, angels would catch him. Then, didn't they throw james off of a high part of the temple? Like they were taunting him, let's see if that will work for you.
As the brother of the dead anointed one, did James assume the title of potential Davidic ruler? Did he preach that now it was his responsibility to do the political and supernatural duties of a Messiah, or was there a James version of second coming?
In the book of Thomas..The disciples said to Jesus, " We understand that you will depart from us.Who will guide us?".. Jesus replied to them, " Wherever you are, go to James the Just, for the sake of whom heaven and earth emerged."
Awesome!
In the book of Thomas it also says Go To James the just,what is accepted and not. Hmmm.
Even more interesting is that Jesus said that the heavens and earth were created for His (James') sake
Excellent
the thumbnail for this vid looks strangely like Paul McCartney. just felt the need to share
Thank you very much
I have wondered if someone with a vested interest in the movement removed information about James to position themselves better,
Sometimes, it seems that the most important thing did was to inspire Paul.
To learn more about James you can read Robert Eisenmann...
Why can't we find any tombs for any of these very important people?
Wow, James! This is fantastic. I'll go back to the videos you did around this same time and hopefully find more info. Is this from a particular one of your books? I need to acquire it.
Rome couldn't arrest Jesus and disciples, as Rome did immediately for other false claimants, because when Rome initially tried to arrest Jesus, they were immobilized. Secondly, because there was a Roman occupation of Judea, the Jewish authorities couldn't openly proclaim Jesus the Messiah, which they knew He was because the Romans couldn't arrest Jesus.
Is it possible that they chose Luke and Acts, knowing that they down played James and the rest of Jesus's family as a way to protect the family line in some way? Though maybe not...what ya think?
Good point.
I thought that also.
yes bc later with Polycarp among many other's who walked with the true 12 apostles, who would have followed more closely to James' message of Christ, insisted the feast day of passover be kept on it's traditional Jewish calendar he is overruled and it is changed to remove themselves from Jewish tradition. Paul didn't speak much about the abolishment of such festivals as we have some evidence that he still observed them in his own letters, BUT the early apostolic fathers such as Eusebius by the 300's staunchly rejected anything "jewish" or what we would call 1st century Messianic church and these same people who wanted to change the festivals also heavily favored Paul's theology.
Thank you.
Having read the outstanding calloway book on consecration to st. Joseph, I think I would "go to st. Joseph. " St. James should take precedence over the popular st. Jude though .
Interesting but quite a bit of speculation. Food for thought though.
James is Yakob in Hebrew
King James renamed him after himself at the creation of the King James bible
The 3 fold manifested man corresponds to : shushumna, ida and pingala
Aswel a to sat chit ananda
In greek ' makarios'
In my seventh time of returning to Yehovah God and Yeshua ha Messiach I found in James 4:7-10 to be the true understanding and knowledge of a return that showed to be true with the evidence of the devil running away from me and his sin that he loans and even teaches how to multiply the sin even runs away with him
This teaching of James is not just a read but a physical doing , standing and submitting yourself to Yehovah God, resisting the devil and knowing the heart is now cleansed and the hands are washed, drawing near to the Father and the Father drawing near to you, humbling yourself and waiting for our Father to lift you up, resisting the devil is telling him that he is no longer your father or cruel slave master and that you are no longer his son or ignorant slave, the Spirit of holiness will be present and this is what causes the devil to run and your name written in the heavens
If you want to follow Jesus, believe the gospel.
Have you read the Gnostic gospels…the ones that were left out by the Roman Catholic Church around 300+ years AD
@@moonbeamyoga8868 the King James Bible is all you need
@@jamesw6111 its why you are following james and paul/saul.
Jesus NEVER endorsed your bible. !!
@@modusoperandiofsatan the Bible was written by inspiration of the Holy Sprit. Does Jesus not endorse his own word?
@@jamesw6111 Amen 👏🙌
So you're saying we should all be Nazarene
Is this a reading from Jesus Dynasty?
I would be interested to know what Dr Tabor would think about the idea that Jesus (and his family at the helm of the movement) were based on (or modeled after in story form) Judah of Galilee, his family, the fourth philosophy and what eventually became known as zealots. Making the first generation christians firmly zealots. I find that theory highly interesting.
Considering how often Dr Tabor emphasizes Jesus’ historicity, I would imagine he doesn’t give that idea much thought.
@@paulallenscards That's too bad. I find the whole "composite Jesus" as something very worthy of taking a look see. As being more historically representative of a movement than one single man. Very intriguing theory. Not straight myth but not straight history either. Best of both worlds lol
@@Vina_Ravyn I agree that it’s a very intriguing conversation. But in purview of the current scholarly consensus, the subject too far from the realm of plausibility for most to explore it any deeper than the textual records otherwise indicate.
@@paulallenscards That's far too bad. Seems to me the textual records offers us multiple stories that indicate that Jesus is mainly used for theological proofs more than historical accuracy. I think even Dr Tabor would agree with that. I do think the fundamentalism in scholarship is kinda funny considering how far outside the box the New Testament is opposed to what the Jewish scriptures say. It was worth a shot. ;)
@@Vina_Ravyn - I think at the very least there is some influence. You might be interested in a paper (open access) recommended by Dr Samuel Zinner recently - here is the citation: Bermejo-Rubio, Fernando. "Jesus and the Anti-Roman Resistance", Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 12, 1-2 (2014):1-105.
the Jerusalem council decision from what i understand whats because Moses os taught every sabbath so the 4 things cmvert do its the beginning while they learn Mosaic law.
Jesus, killed on a Friday and by Sunday his followers had decided it was better to start a death cult than to carry on his work.
Where is part 2?
I most love . Long . Form .
Hva mener du med apocolyptic movement?
Many people are waking up to the fact that Christanity was let astray for two millennia by following the teachings of Paul who never met the living historical Jesus, was not one of his original disciples, and seemed not to know much about his sayings and teachings as evidenced by his epistles. He invented theology and Christology that historical Jesus never preached. Is it any wonder that he was at odds with James and early church in Jerusalem?
Yeah Paul called it Christianity and Jesus and his disciples called it the way....
@@Jason-vf2mj I think James Tabor has a video lecture where he shows that "The Way" terminology was more of an Essene belief and terminology. I could be remembering this wrong, but maybe someone with a better study of this can comment.
Great video! I am curious why you think Mark was a Jew? His gospel is high level greek, and in chapter 7 he has to explain to his audience about ritual purity, and he gets a lot wrong.
James the Just: I am the true successor of Jesus
Peter & Paul (and a Mary wannabe): Puff, the magic dragon lived by the sea
And frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honah Lee.
What is the origin and history of the detestable phrase, “mother of god”?
The Council of Ephesus in AD 431 decreed that Mary is the Theotokos "God-bearer" because Her Son Jesus is both God and man: one divine person from two natures (divine and human) intimately and hypostatically united.
The title of Mother of God or Mother of Incarnate God; is most often used in English, largely due to the lack of a satisfactory equivalent of the Greek τόκος. For the same reason, the title is often left untranslated, as "Theotokos", in Orthodox liturgical usage of other languages.
The title has been in use since the 3rd century, in the Syriac tradition.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theotokos
Rome replaced Pilate as governor of Palestine. Because his cruelty contributed to the Jewish revolt.
Why are you quoting the gospel of Thomas in your description 😂
James' the Just succession, or one of biggest cover-ups of Christian history.
Eisenmann's book is interesting but such a tedious read and so confuse.
If you have other recommandé books about James Mr Tabor?
Thanks.
The Brother of Jesus by Butz is quite good.
@@YaoEspirito I forgot that I had that one in my Kindle, I'll check it.
👍
👍
The image of that Jesus in the thumbnail is super fake 🤥
Where is part 2
I’m here. 37
They were right, the Apocalypse came as Titus, son of Vespasian, and his tenth legion. The destruction of Jerusalem and Temple in AD70.
Blast it!How do you expect us to be interested in a video that is much less tahn an hour? :)
In the book of Thomas, Jesus tells His apostles to follow James the Just, for the Heavens and earth was created for His sake. It's hard to understand what he meant by that. It sounds to me that James was either God Himself, or a very important prophet
Edit: the name James means supplanter and/or substitute
James Tabor The Unjust!!! 😈🔥
Where's part 2?
I thought james didn't actually write this ?
James was written before the Crucifixion.
These are interesting. So am I led to believe that a lineage of Jesus's family descendants are still walking amongst us currently? How come the Beatles get all the attention?? Where are they and why don't they say hi. Maybe they don't know who they are. Where would they be, what continent, country, state, town, house. I will believe it, take it or leave it, when I see it.
His descendants were all killed by the jooo and his mob.. Now that same mob presented you with the Bible.
I understand where you are coming from Michael Jeremy, I think the whole world would like to just be told the truth, it feels like a battle at times. I was brought up as a Catholic, as I got older I didn’t like their strictness, and money seemed more important than faith. I never enjoyed school as a child, and felt bullied by their rules, one thing that i find odd now is that we weren’t taught much about the bible, there was never a bible in my home. A few years ago I felt the need to research, and learn as much as I could about Jesus, God, and the bloodline, there are lot’s of theories, conspiracies, some sound crazy, some evil, but I do believe if there were, or are, they would probably face great danger. Just my opinion of course, the Devinci Code for an example.
True
Interesting
Where is the evidence that Luke was not a Jew or a Jewish convert?
It's an interesting perspective and it certainly does seem clear that James was leader of Jesus movement after his death. What's less clear is why.
In addition to Luke minimizing his role in Acts, did all the Gospel writers basically take him out of their stories? Or was he truly not particularly involved in the movement before Jesus's death?
In the modern world, where we put less emphasis on blood ties, is there any reason to think that James was the best person to carry on Jesus's teachings? That he had the best understanding of the message?
And as a side note, you emphasize Jesus (and thus James) as a descendant of David and thus of the royal line. Is there any evidence of that as a belief in the earliest days? IIRC, it's introduced in two different forms by Luke and Matthew, but the lineage isn't given in Mark. Or mentioned by Paul.
I think your suggestion regarding James being the leader of the Jesus movement is right on. The authors of the canonical gospels wrote James out of their accounts because they belonged to a different and later faction of the movement which never acknowledged James' authority. They had an apocalyptic message not shared by James. Luke (Acts) delivers his apocalyptic message through Peter on Pentecost. In my view, Peter got the message wrong, running around warning everyone to save themselves from God's imminent coming judgment. I noticed that after Jesus called Peter “Satan” for seeking the will of men over God, Peter is never reinstated by Jesus. (I know, John sees the problem and gives him a 'presidential pardon' for history's sake some 30 years later.) But notice that Peter never changed nor did he relent in his message “seeking the will of men and not of God”, for which Jesus had rebuked him. James was the acknowledged leader of the Jerusalem group until his assassination in 62 CE. But none of the four canonical gospels was written before 70 CE, following James' death. So, from James to the canonical gospels represents the passage of a full generation of developmental changes in the Jesus movement. It went from “The kingdom of heaven is within you.” to warning of the coming “blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke”. I like the original (non-apocalyptic) message the best. I welcome your thoughts of my ponderings. Peace.
@@neilhundtoft4873 If James was as important as it appears then I highly doubt he would have allowed a right-hand man(Peter) to be someone Jesus did not approve of.
But everyone, both good and bad, serves God's purpose. Judas Iscariot was also chosen by Jesus to be an apostle even though Jesus knew full well he would betray him. And so, Jesus chose Peter, the rock, to further Jesus' purpose by having him found a church. Jesus accommodates what the people wanted. But of course it is the rock the builders rejected, which is Jesus and not Peter or the church, who is the true cornerstone of faith. Right after Peter confesses Jesus to be the messiah, Jesus rebukes Peter for promoting men's purposes over God's. Peter wanted a Davidic king to retsore Jewish independence from Rome. At Matthew 16:23, Jesus tells us what he thinks of this idea. “Get behind me Satan, for you are a stumbling block to me!” The Greek word in verse 23 is σκάνδαλον (skandalon), which means a stumbling block. Although Jesus called Peter a rock, he tells us he means that Peter, (and his church) are actually a stumbling-block, an impediment, to coming to the truth, not its foundation. So it is is with the organized church. The church was founded, on purpose by Jesus, as a phase and full of error, as the kindergarten of our education in faith. It is a place for us to grow through as we come to learn our true identity apart from any organized religion. This view has also given me a way to understand Saying #40. “A grapevine has been planted outside the father, but being unsound, it will be uprooted and perish.” We are provided our education by the church, and then, those of us who seek it, graduate. We develop and grow from yielding 60 per measure to 120 per measure. Peace and light to all.@@Dragonfly20233
I think because James died early on, so people had to believe in Peter as their leader.
Get truth from the Bible.
James does not appear early in leadership because he was an unbeliever (explained in the gospels) until Jesus' Passion. But by Acts 15, Peter was already subordinate to James who by then believed in Jesus..
As church leader, the Holy Ghost (thru Paul) replaced the Apostles after the failure of the Pentecostal, Jerusalem church. Paul's set of house churches then propagated the of grace.
@@edwardwalsh5477 I'd be careful of your trust in Paul. Rev 2 Jesus talks about the false apostle who comes and how they did a good job running him off. Paul himself states that he never preaches anywhere the word has already been preached. So we know he was the only one at the early church in Ephesus and ironically in Acts we have the story about how Paul was run out of Ephesus and they tried to stone him for the heresy of his message.
@@Dragonfly20233 You are amazing! Few people have been so brazen as to warn AGAINST a writer of the Bible! Usually, it's just benign neglect that causes their ignorance.
A) St. Paul is recognized by PETER (2 Pt 3:15-16) as a brother and for his extraordinary wisdom yet not easy to understand (for Peter - remember how Peter resisted the directive by God to go into Cornelius' house - and for many leading theologians of today also.
B) It's a widespread problem in Christian leaders and here too that none seems to understand that God has changed His expectations (rules, if you will) several time in scripture. Careful bible study with an eye to such changes would be earthshaking to many ignorant teachers. God created the heaven and earth but later on drowned all but 8 souls in a worldwide flood. Major change!
2) When the world became corrupt again, he shifted from coverage of world to give attention to Abraham and his offspring (called Israel and fills most of the Bible) because he started a different plan; salvation of the willing in the world by the few (Israel). I believe that the Revelation passage you cite occurs after the close of the dispensation in which we live - the dispensation of Grace (as opposed to that of LAW or Conscience)- AND after Rome had chopped Paul's head from his body. (home at last)
C) "Paul was run out of Ephesus and they tried to stone him for the heresy of his message."
I don't know how you got the idea that the violence against Paul in Ephesus was motivated by theology. It was nothing of the sort. It was caused there as it was in Acts 16:19 for loss of evil trade resulting in economic loss to the tradesmen. Not to say that Paul never suffered for preaching of his gospel (the latest one offered by God thru the risen Christ) the gospel of the grace of God. All prior gospel (of the Kingdom) required conformity to the Law of Moses AND faith that God would forgive after the propter sacrifice. But that was debated in Acts 15 and settled there with Peter's conclusion (15:11) that Paul and Barnabus should continue to preach what was clearly effective in winning Gentiles (AND NOW JEWS) to God thru Christ's blood - hardly mentioned by any other Jewish writer because the Church had been only in God's mind (not in prophesy) from before the world began. Studying the Gospels which relate mostly precross events, causes ignorance about the true nature of the Church (body of Christ) and its mission and the powerful role that it plays (empowered by the universal, permanent indwelling of God's Holy Spirit in members) in redeeming the wiling of the world from sin and perdition.
C) This presentation is a prime example of confused thinkers who overlook the changing methods and expectations of the Creator.
Do continue study using a concordance to locate the "time - related" phrases to get clarification of the CHANGES that God has brought to this world "in order to save some"!
Algo
"Follow Cemukay, who has over one hundred videos on Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Everything is discussed openly, to the point and without bias. You won’t find videos like these…
Bet you didnt know this James( kind of ironic that your name is James too)...I'am in Alcoholics Annonymous for 22 years. One of the founders Dr. Bob Smith was a Christian man along with his wife . He paid so much attention to the Book of James in the bible, when writing the Big Book of AA, That the original name for AA was almost called...The James Club"
Now Dr. William JAMES was the biggest influence to the other AA founder Bill Wilson. He had nothing to do with the book of James, I just thought it was interesting that his last name is James. Some believe thathe book of James was written by a Stoic, but thats a whole different rabbit hole. I also heard it may have been...Marcion of Sinope.
Yes sir :) I haven’t thought about that history in a while :)
🙏💚🧡👍